Washington becomes 10th state to ban assault weapons | LiveNOW from FOX

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 1,4 тыс.

  • @Warhorse1975
    @Warhorse1975 Год назад +378

    So semi automatic firearms are illegal but all street drugs are. Good work Washington!

    • @bldlightpainting
      @bldlightpainting Год назад +1

      Druggie criminals, that's what Democrats are.

    • @davidmoore3479
      @davidmoore3479 Год назад +19

      must be a govt of junkies .

    • @tommybombadil8651
      @tommybombadil8651 Год назад +7

      All street drugs are what?

    • @AdL629
      @AdL629 Год назад +6

      Well just like street drugs, you can own them but you can't sell them. Somehow that makes them go away or not get used maliciously. But how can they stop drugs? People will just 3D print more.

    • @jasonlopez4855
      @jasonlopez4855 Год назад

      That's even a revolver is semi automatic 🔫 there going to take away all 🔫 now. This is not going to help 🆘 psychos when people flip out.

  • @randomamerican471
    @randomamerican471 Год назад +142

    Actually they were designed for civilian use. Nobody uses these civilian versions in war.

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад +19

      Now come on! It seems like you're trying to start a truthful logical conversation about a constitutionally protected right. Don't you know that's not how this works!?! Emotions only please.

    • @ballsack8937
      @ballsack8937 Год назад +7

      @@mattschmitt9924 yup anything logical will get your comment removed

    • @Qaptyl
      @Qaptyl Год назад +6

      but it shouldnt matter. civilians should be allowed to own military weapons too

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад +3

      AR15 - It was intended for the U.S. military, which was in need of a lightweight rifle with expanded ammunition capacity. But after it failed to attract buyers, ArmaLite sold its AR-15 design to Colt, one of America's oldest gunmakers... yeah cause civilians need them LOL

    • @Qaptyl
      @Qaptyl Год назад +4

      @@grizzybear9111 yeah because they indeed do.

  • @DLCoates1
    @DLCoates1 Год назад +101

    “There is no reason for anyone to own an assault weapon.”
    Meanwhile second amendment: Its important for civilians to be armed with weapons equal to our military to prevent a tyrannical government.
    Sounds like inslee is scared.

    • @ranman5501
      @ranman5501 Год назад +9

      Exactly what they said. Illegal for civilian purchase, but not police or military. Proof the 2nd amendment is needed!

    • @Heathensauce
      @Heathensauce Год назад

      Yep, first take your guns, then take your freedom of speech, last take your rights and make you work for the overlord corporations for free.

    • @tfpnation6925
      @tfpnation6925 Год назад +1

      I don’t think he’s scared when there’s five or six people protesting outside

  • @leanit5756
    @leanit5756 Год назад +298

    It is terrifying that people are so emotional and clearly ignorant of history and civics that they could even ponder this as a good idea.

    • @danielmanly4793
      @danielmanly4793 Год назад +43

      That is the power of propaganda

    • @carloslunna6174
      @carloslunna6174 Год назад

      I feel like we are just seeing the illusion of choice
      That's 1/5 of the United States soon will be like Canada if we don't stand up

    • @BERSERKERNA39
      @BERSERKERNA39 Год назад

      You can't fix stupid.

    • @beefsupreme6488
      @beefsupreme6488 Год назад

      ​@@danielmanly4793 trump supporters fall for the same bs the Democrats do our country is doomed

    • @nathansutphin6543
      @nathansutphin6543 Год назад +1

      So do tell what in civics or American history should tell Americans this is a bad idea champ? Other than the fact that so many innocent people over the last couple of decades have died to firearms?

  • @bwill8536
    @bwill8536 Год назад +261

    Two lawsuits have already been filed right after this unconstitutional ban came into effect. Shall not be infringed! Those traitors should be removed from office.

    • @JRose-zn7iw
      @JRose-zn7iw Год назад

      Clear violation of the Constitution THEY are SWORN to UPHOLD = TREASON.

    • @Hadyobm100
      @Hadyobm100 Год назад

      Just make bombs america because its happening to take away your rights..

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад +16

      They should be prosecuted for treason and publicly carry out the sentencing.

    • @travishamlin7106
      @travishamlin7106 Год назад +8

      @@mattschmitt9924 then dangle

    • @brucepoole8552
      @brucepoole8552 Год назад +1

      Shall be a organized militia

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 Год назад +233

    All officials passing or enforcing any form of illegal unconstitutional gun control laws should be immediately removed from their offices under title 18 U.S.C. section 1918, title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 section 5, they should be arrested, charged, and prosecuted under title 18 U.S.C. section 241 conspiracy against rights and title 18 U.S.C. section 242 deprivation of rights under color of law.

    • @mountainman9973
      @mountainman9973 Год назад +1

      I agree but it will never happen the system is rigged those who make the laws don't have to abide by them. King ensley thinks we shouldn't have guns anymore while he opens the prison doors and let's all of the murders and cons run our streets while he gives free heroin to the homeless and imports illegal aliens from our border into our cities and towns while he has armed guards day and night he expects us not to have guns. We The peasants don't need any rights we should just listen to King ensley

    • @evilrevolations
      @evilrevolations Год назад +23

      They should also face a civil suit under 42 U.S. Code § 1983 for violation of civil rights under color of law.

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад +20

      They should also face the gallows at sunrise.

    • @Robnord1
      @Robnord1 Год назад +1

      @@mattschmitt9924 I would attend a hemp necktie event for Jay fooking Inslee and others with a party hat and noisemaker. Traitors deserve no less.

    • @RoverTheDog1
      @RoverTheDog1 Год назад +4

      Online lawyers are hilarious 😂

  • @bldlightpainting
    @bldlightpainting Год назад +163

    There is no such thing as an assault weapon, and what they are falsely calling a weapon of war is simply just another semi-automatic firearm that has been owned by civilians for well over a hundred years.

    • @bryandamkaer3646
      @bryandamkaer3646 Год назад +16

      but it's ok to possess fentenyl , meth , heroin and the like.
      The legislative body couldn't 'agree' on a plan for drug possession so now it seems it's perfectly legal to carry drugs that kill

    • @brucepoole8552
      @brucepoole8552 Год назад

      Everyone knows what is meant by the term assault weapon, the favored weapon of school shooters

    • @jimr3751
      @jimr3751 Год назад +5

      Yes I would like anyone in our current government definite what exactly a assault whepon is. I'll wait it could be along wait. SARCASUM

    • @brucepoole8552
      @brucepoole8552 Год назад +1

      @@jimr3751 everone knows what is meant by the term assault weapon stop splitting hairs, you know exactly what is meant

    • @shaunobrien6425
      @shaunobrien6425 Год назад +5

      @@brucepoole8552 Lay it out there then

  • @TheProAer
    @TheProAer Год назад +24

    "Those who trade a little bit of Liberty for Safety deserve neither." - Benjamin Franklin -

  • @ProjectPete
    @ProjectPete Год назад +155

    they didnt ban assault weapons. They redefined every modern firearm as an assault weapon and then banned them all.

  • @danielfrausto2405
    @danielfrausto2405 Год назад +135

    Violated our rights smh

    • @BladeObssession
      @BladeObssession Год назад +15

      Yeah and they still can't define assault weapon. That can mean whatever they want. It could mean assault butter knife

    • @bldlightpainting
      @bldlightpainting Год назад +1

      Washington just become the 10th state to ban so-called "assault weapons". Yet there is no such thing as an "assault weapon", and what they are falsely calling a "weapon of war" is simply just a semi-automatic firearm that has been owned by hundreds of millions of US civilians for well over a hundred years.
      Therefore this unconstitutional law will be met with many lawsuits, for Democrats are seeking to control law-abiding citizens, making it much harder to defend themselves, yet allowing violent BLM and other criminals terrorize this country for years.

    • @TheIndestructibleRichardNixon
      @TheIndestructibleRichardNixon Год назад +4

      leave the state.

    • @danielfrausto2405
      @danielfrausto2405 Год назад +1

      @@Lovebomb-pu7ji theirs a bill goin on in California to ban handguns in 2027

    • @BladeObssession
      @BladeObssession Год назад

      @Lovebomb yup

  • @Scorch1028
    @Scorch1028 Год назад +120

    This law will not survive constitutional scrutiny.

    • @ST19859
      @ST19859 Год назад +16

      Im sure they will just appeal it over and over then write a new slightly different law if this one gets overturned, California has been doing the same for years and they are never held accountable

    • @bldlightpainting
      @bldlightpainting Год назад +1

      Washington just become the 10th state to ban so-called "assault weapons". Yet there is no such thing as an "assault weapon", and what they are falsely calling a "weapon of war" is simply just a semi-automatic firearm that has been owned by hundreds of millions of US civilians for well over a hundred years.
      Therefore this unconstitutional law will be met with many lawsuits, for Democrats are seeking to control law-abiding citizens, making it much harder to defend themselves, yet allowing violent BLM and other criminals terrorize this country for years.

    • @Republic4ever714
      @Republic4ever714 Год назад

      California just learned that they were shut down cannot ban a unalienable right period end of story!

    • @mrdato116
      @mrdato116 Год назад +3

      @@ST19859 at least in California you still can own assault rifles, even standard capacity mags thanks to freedom week.

    • @ST19859
      @ST19859 Год назад +3

      @@mrdato116 That is true, sometimes I m amazed we still have that here. I honestly expect CA to change their laws soon to be even worse than WA, I mean they cant be out liberaled by anyone else

  • @Pistolerong_Pinoy
    @Pistolerong_Pinoy Год назад +35

    I’m not an american,but I think this law will not stop the bad guys from obtaining the so called “assault rifles.”this law will only disarm law abiding citizens but not the lawless or criminals.

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад +12

      For not being an American, you seem to have a better grasp of the repercussions of these choices than the ones working for us.

    • @se7ense7ens37
      @se7ense7ens37 Год назад +4

      I live in the US AND Washington and you are right. I think if of any state gun laws would be restricted in this is one of the worst because of how dangerous some places around here are. For instance, places like Kent, Yelm, especially Downtown Oly and Seattle are SWARMING with aggressive homeless people doing hard drugs. Makes me nervous man..

    • @johnnymcblaze
      @johnnymcblaze Год назад

      The poor should not be able to own firearms. The poor always want positive change, so this is a nessisary step to keep those at the bottom of the pyramid, in their place.

  • @sublimetulii23
    @sublimetulii23 Год назад +71

    Make politicians put their money & freedoms on the line. If laws passed are overturned because they’re unconstitutional, they should have to pay a $25,000 fine & automatically get 10 years in prison for knowingly abusing their powers.

    • @mastermeow1582
      @mastermeow1582 Год назад

      They should have to repay the public.
      To think all these dems that have our tax money wasted on laws that cost millions to implement and enforce for them to then be deemed unconstitutional is just sad.

    • @7.62dog5
      @7.62dog5 Год назад +4

      Not 25 k. All their assest seized

    • @jonp6347
      @jonp6347 Год назад

      Agree

    • @Heathensauce
      @Heathensauce Год назад

      Corporations need to take our guns, how are we supposed to work for free if we can riot and fight back?

  • @MrMadmanUSA
    @MrMadmanUSA Год назад +53

    And the tenth state that will have it overturned in federal court.

    • @yourlogicalnightmare1014
      @yourlogicalnightmare1014 Год назад

      The Supreme Court has no authority over Governors or state legislators. The Supreme Court is irrelevant

    • @sksjustice7693
      @sksjustice7693 Год назад

      Nothing overturned the NY SAFE act. Still law in NY. This Washington state ban. Is on a whole new level of tyranny.

    • @scottcooper4391
      @scottcooper4391 Год назад

      It's just going to take time (and money) to overturn.

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад

      No overturn will happen, keep dreaming lol the people have spoken they don't want these mass murder guns

  • @tonberryhugs6435
    @tonberryhugs6435 Год назад +42

    ...Who is going to tell them about the mass shootings in states with this law already in place? Might burst their liberal bubble.

    • @bigshoe84
      @bigshoe84 Год назад +4

      They aren’t interested in hearing about it, it’s an emotional decision they have made and no amount of facts can change their minds.

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад +3

      Not possible to burst liberal socialist bubble

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 Год назад +58

    Unconstitutional in violation of the second and fourteenth amendment therefore not legally binding enforceable law. No citizen is bound to obey any unconstitutional laws.

    • @bldlightpainting
      @bldlightpainting Год назад +1

      Washington just become the 10th state to ban so-called "assault weapons". Yet there is no such thing as an "assault weapon", and what they are falsely calling a "weapon of war" is simply just a semi-automatic firearm that has been owned by hundreds of millions of US civilians for well over a hundred years.
      Therefore this unconstitutional law will be met with many lawsuits, for Democrats are seeking to control law-abiding citizens, making it much harder to defend themselves, yet allowing violent BLM and other criminals terrorize this country for years.

    • @1000HoursAtTheLibrar
      @1000HoursAtTheLibrar Год назад

      Say that to a cop in one these states to their face.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 Год назад

      @@1000HoursAtTheLibrarI would gladly. I'm not afraid of oath breaking domestic terrorist traitors wearing badges.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 Год назад +3

      @@1000HoursAtTheLibrar it was ruled that in 1908 and 1886 by the supreme Court.
      US supreme Court
      "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since it's unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment... In legal contemplation it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it. A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. A unconstitutional law cannot operate to supercede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land (the constitution)it is superceded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."
      Bonnet V. Vallier, 16 NW. 885,136 Wis. 193(1908); Norton V. Shelby county 118 US 425(1886).
      A law repugnant to the constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the constitution cannot become law. The constitution supercedes all other laws and the individuals rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.
      Marbury V. Madison, 5 US 137(1803).
      An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not a crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.
      Ex. Parte Siebold, 100 US-371(1879).
      The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
      Miller V. US 230 F. 2d. 486,489.
      All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void.
      Marbury V. Madison, 5 US (2nd Branch)137,174,176(1803).
      Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.
      Miranda V. Arizona,384 US 436 p.491.
      No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.
      Murdock V. Pennsylvania,319 US 105.
      If the state converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.
      Shuttles worth V. City of Birmingham,Alabama, 373 US 262.
      The court is to protect against any encroachment of constitutionally protected liberties.
      Boyd V. US 116 US 616.
      The constitution is a written instrument. As such it's meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted it means now.
      S. Carolina V. US 199 US 437,448(1905).
      Supremacy clause
      The supremacy clause of the constitution of the united states, establishes that the constitution supreme law of the land takes priority over any conflicting laws.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 Год назад

      @@1000HoursAtTheLibrar 14th amendment
      No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states
      Abridge
      Curtail (a right or privilege), to reduce in scope, diminish, Deprive.

  • @williamcancilla4615
    @williamcancilla4615 Год назад +111

    Disgusting. These politicians should be ashamed.
    Great reporting nonetheless.

    • @randymorrison5513
      @randymorrison5513 Год назад

      They’re not politicians, they’re communist sympathizers

    • @dizanelli
      @dizanelli Год назад

      Great reporting? 😂😂😂 the douche canoe called a semi-automatic rifle a military style weapon

    • @bruceferry3825
      @bruceferry3825 Год назад +5

      In their eyes they're the heros and they're proud of themselves. It's astonishing to see that they're proud that they're destroying what was once a free state.

    • @1000HoursAtTheLibrar
      @1000HoursAtTheLibrar Год назад

      The rest of your weapon arsenal not good enough?

    • @dr.burtgummerfan439
      @dr.burtgummerfan439 Год назад +2

      @@1000HoursAtTheLibrar How is that any of your business? Do you question how many cars or TVs or swords people own?

  • @deadlyta
    @deadlyta 11 месяцев назад +3

    Stop calling them assualt weapons
    Semi auto weapons ban
    In violation of the 2nd ammendment

    • @zoy13
      @zoy13 7 месяцев назад

      How can I enforce it?

  • @dmvcode3gaming187
    @dmvcode3gaming187 Год назад +19

    I love how they blame the gun and not person who did the crime

  • @Dulex123
    @Dulex123 Год назад +7

    I love when people make a reference on how the ar 15 is a assault weapon

    • @lonniebeal6032
      @lonniebeal6032 6 месяцев назад

      And AR doesn't even mean assault rifle...

  • @Really........
    @Really........ Год назад +29

    As criminals run wild, lets take away the ability for law abiding citizens to defend themselves. We know who's side these politicians are on.

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад

      Just use a handgun ... that's not banned

    • @Really........
      @Really........ Год назад +4

      @@grizzybear9111 There should be nothing banned.

    • @commiesnzombies
      @commiesnzombies Год назад

      we already know they bend the knee to antifa / blm

    • @johnnymcblaze
      @johnnymcblaze Год назад

      Criminals are running wild to make it easier to take guns. After the ban, they will start keeping criminals locked up for a long time, and site the drop in crime as due to the gun ban.

    • @johnnymcblaze
      @johnnymcblaze Год назад +1

      ​@@grizzybear9111 hand guns are semi automatic. If you are so woefully ignorant, why do you even write anything?

  • @robertchase1722
    @robertchase1722 Год назад +31

    They know its unconstitutional . There's a lot of these politicians who only see the constitution as a written document that can always be subjected for change. Shall not be infringed!!

    • @commiesnzombies
      @commiesnzombies Год назад

      Democrats think they are the final word on what constitutional rights everyone can or cannot have, they need to stay in their own lane and mind their own fcking business

  • @bobbobbington3615
    @bobbobbington3615 Год назад +32

    So... it won't impact crime.

    • @googleuser868
      @googleuser868 Год назад

      The hell it won't. This give criminals a green light to rape, murder and pillage.

    • @killerwardog3354
      @killerwardog3354 Год назад

      ​@Daniel Nelson like taking candy from a baby making my line of work less threatening thanks 😂

    • @scottcooper4391
      @scottcooper4391 Год назад

      No - it will add a lot of previously Law abiding citizens to the criminal class.

  • @CardelliFamof8
    @CardelliFamof8 Год назад +2

    Unconstitutional 😢 really sucks

  • @twombonu
    @twombonu Год назад +3

    In Switzerland, everyone owns a squad automatic weapon, and yet, the crime rate is nearly zero. You don't solve social issues with emotions, use your brain instead.

    • @RCenal
      @RCenal Год назад

      Damn Skippy

  • @CoinCollector1
    @CoinCollector1 Год назад +5

    You should poin out that 7,000 people showed up to testify that is bill shouldn’t pass!! While only 1,200 showed up to want it passed

  • @VILLVINOUS88
    @VILLVINOUS88 Год назад +3

    This is sickening

  • @BladeObssession
    @BladeObssession Год назад +8

    It won't disarm not one criminal

  • @patricklowder3280
    @patricklowder3280 Год назад +22

    This is NOT about saftey, this IS about control.

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад

      No it's about safety but you can tell yourself anything to justify owning a murder weapon

    • @edwelndiobel1567
      @edwelndiobel1567 Год назад +3

      @@grizzybear9111 No it isnt about safety, its about disarming all those who oppose liberalism and big government.

    • @jspears2320
      @jspears2320 Год назад +1

      @@grizzybear9111c’mon dude you just told someone in another comment to use a handgun because they aren’t banned. Go look up deaths by handgun versus rifles. Any device used to kill another person is a “murder weapon” whether thats a plastic bag to suffocate someone or a pen jabbed through someone’s eye.
      I can provide you with sources that overwhelmingly point to the fact that AR and AK patterned rifles only make up a fraction of gun related deaths. Albeit I know it wouldn’t do anything to change your mind, because you don’t have any knowledge when it comes to the world of firearms.

    • @Jojo-vo4cu
      @Jojo-vo4cu Год назад

      😂😂😂lol just like how conservatives try to control other people's bodies all the time. And they have their own "reason" for how it may affect society. Well there's reasons to ban these guns for how they affect society too. And a lot worse things happen with these guns being out there then the negative effects of things that are caused by things they wanna take away and ban. Literally mass murder and slaughter of people in mass shootings and school shootings. Children being murdered and massacred in schools. That's 100,000 times worse than the effects drugs have on the world. I'm glad to see conservatives getting their "rights" taken away😂

  • @KHallesy
    @KHallesy 6 месяцев назад +1

    Any officers of the court that even remotely discuss the restriction or banning of firearms is committing the act of treason “Thomas Jefferson~

  • @larrymitchell6470
    @larrymitchell6470 Год назад +12

    I hope all gun manufacturers move out of Washington and Oregon and simply move to southern states that observe the Constitution. Then no longer sell to law enforcement to those states as well as Federal agencies in those states…to respect their views.

  • @LouSaydus
    @LouSaydus Год назад +58

    Imagine actually following this clearly illegal "law"

    • @mr-0074
      @mr-0074 Год назад

      Why do you even need an assault weapon?

    • @sksjustice7693
      @sksjustice7693 Год назад +20

      @@mr-0074 why do politicians, celebrities, and the rich. Need what you’re calling “assault weapons”. For their armed security details?

    • @brycenhubbard6224
      @brycenhubbard6224 Год назад +13

      ​@@mr-0074why do politicians ARMED SECURITY need assault weapons? Why does our military need assault weapons? Why do the police need assault weapons? If the average citizen no longer has an "assault rifle" as you people call it, then theres no more threat, clearly the police dont need them either.

    • @billjones5196
      @billjones5196 Год назад +7

      @@mr-0074 Government .

    • @dr.burtgummerfan439
      @dr.burtgummerfan439 Год назад +5

      @@mr-0074 What's the "Bill Of Needs"? Is that a thing?

  • @yuuur4930
    @yuuur4930 Год назад +2

    absolutely shameful. get this bs out of here

  • @Nork490
    @Nork490 Год назад +11

    This is a dark day for Washington state.

  • @mattrogers8280
    @mattrogers8280 Год назад +2

    People’s feelings don’t trump my rights.

  • @jerrymyers870
    @jerrymyers870 Год назад +4

    Anyone else believe Inslee would be 1st to surrender if China or Russia invades.

  • @avery6600
    @avery6600 Год назад +3

    We can’t allow this to spread

    • @88Expert
      @88Expert Год назад

      Please make it illegal in 50 states

    • @noahsawyer7155
      @noahsawyer7155 Год назад +3

      @@88Expertin your dreams oh mighty meat rider

  • @barbarastaton6158
    @barbarastaton6158 Год назад +4

    The number of school shootings began to rise around the same time people started claiming spankings were abuse: Guns and school bullies have always been a thing and if it wasn't so called assault rifles the same people that complain about them would be screaming about another type of gun they wanted banned, the problem isn't guns it's weak parenting.

  • @joesmith5604
    @joesmith5604 Год назад +1

    No such thing as an assault weapon. It’s a firearm. Period

  • @fufhxufje8379
    @fufhxufje8379 Год назад +9

    You just inspired me to buy one as fast as possible

    • @bradcraig5111
      @bradcraig5111 Год назад +1

      Not in Washington State, you won't.

    • @fufhxufje8379
      @fufhxufje8379 Год назад +4

      @@bradcraig5111 who says I’m buying it legally

    • @googleuser868
      @googleuser868 Год назад

      Road trip time. Freedom loving states should start gun tourism.

    • @bradcraig5111
      @bradcraig5111 Год назад

      @@fufhxufje8379 Not me.

    • @fufhxufje8379
      @fufhxufje8379 Год назад +2

      @@bradcraig5111 👍 I’ll have my full auto AR no matter what don’t care who says I can’t. They can come try and take it

  • @fufhxufje8379
    @fufhxufje8379 Год назад +18

    Somebody in Washington needs to stand their ground and show them we won’t accept this. Next they’ll be coming to our doors and taking them. Someone should open an illegal market and not back down.

  • @DCXCoorexDakarCoore
    @DCXCoorexDakarCoore Год назад +2

    I'm a law abiding gun owner. Come try and gets my guns .

    • @SunGodLuffy_5
      @SunGodLuffy_5 Год назад

      Hell yeah pry them out of my cold dead hands 😈

  • @acetorres8787
    @acetorres8787 Год назад +3

    After my wife finishes medical school we out of this state

    • @lonniebeal6032
      @lonniebeal6032 6 месяцев назад

      Never vote blue, no matter who...That includes your next state.

  • @ok_1621
    @ok_1621 Год назад +1

    Isn't this what every dictator does before they round up everyone and massacred them in a pit

  • @atumre4705
    @atumre4705 Год назад +4

    Shame on Washington State.

  • @xhag1x
    @xhag1x Год назад +2

    Not going to affect their crime rate

  • @dilligaf1009
    @dilligaf1009 Год назад +26

    Let's ban millions of assault weapons... That aren't assault weapons. Frigging brilliant

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад

      They are you are just brainwashed by the NRA

    • @dilligaf1009
      @dilligaf1009 Год назад

      @@Lovebomb-pu7ji since the beginning of time.

  • @JRose-zn7iw
    @JRose-zn7iw Год назад +2

    "Shall not" means SHALL NOT.

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 Год назад +15

    14th amendment section 1
    No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states

  • @dustdevilstacker
    @dustdevilstacker Год назад +2

    Inslee is a joke. Eastern WA really needs to secede and join eastern OR and Idaho.

  • @calidude3758
    @calidude3758 Год назад +5

    Does NOT pass constitutional muster. Null and Void... And tyrannical.

  • @thewendigo5992
    @thewendigo5992 Год назад +2

    Free people of Washington must not comply!

  • @bryandamkaer3646
    @bryandamkaer3646 Год назад +3

    tyrants being tyrants.
    Meanwhile 2 people a day die in King County from drug overdoses... And they say guns are the health crisis.
    Let the lawsuits fly...
    A very unConstitutional move on Inslee's part... one business in particular had to lose 800+ employees...

  • @michaelpiwcewicz1412
    @michaelpiwcewicz1412 Год назад +2

    THEYWILL LOSE IN COURT SOON//

  • @jmwenterprise2304
    @jmwenterprise2304 Год назад +14

    The reason they have those kinds of weapons is for people like the governor of Washington

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад

      EXACTLY!!!

    • @Jojo-vo4cu
      @Jojo-vo4cu Год назад

      Your rights are getting taken away😂😂😂Hahaha Esai😂👋😘

  • @El_Boots
    @El_Boots Год назад +2

    Funny how y’all see them do unconstitutional thing yet nobody is doing anything America y’all have brought great shame … can’t even defend your own rights just sad 🤦🏽‍♂️

  • @ApriliaRacer14
    @ApriliaRacer14 Год назад +3

    This is great news! All criminals will now stop using “assault” weapons. 😒

    • @88Expert
      @88Expert Год назад

      Only in America will think of that

    • @proven6270
      @proven6270 Год назад

      @@88Expert YOU'RE an ID**T !!!!!

  • @rickywilson2983
    @rickywilson2983 Год назад +2

    So the man went against his oath of office which means he can be voted out of office government is supposed to uphold the Constitution not go against the Constitution he's a crook and you need to be locked up

  • @--sly--
    @--sly-- Год назад +3

    As an independent, I have never seen good ol' Americans, right wingers who shoot innocent children at school. Have you? Let's think about that and let it sink in. You let criminals roam around with no consequences, demolish our police presents, and take away the very thing that could save us from these criminals or, very least, scare them away and yet you really think criminals have no access to getting these weapons? Have you been to Chicago? If they're in a survival movie, they're the first one to go. They really believe their academic skills can save them.

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад

      They are so much smarter than everyone else😂

  • @jpd3484
    @jpd3484 Год назад +1

    Why can't citizens buy a 50 cal machine gun from gun stores. Its our right to bear guns

  • @compass7099
    @compass7099 Год назад +9

    Jay Inslee just sacked the constitution of the United States and Washington state what happened to upholding our constitution

  • @yiannikal5587
    @yiannikal5587 Год назад +2

    Unconstitutional

  • @EdwardSatterfield
    @EdwardSatterfield 7 месяцев назад +1

    Some people don't know what this means to our freedom,what will they ban or control next!

  • @TiredAmerican247
    @TiredAmerican247 Год назад +7

    And when the same outcome happens with a shotgun what then?

    • @castanza128
      @castanza128 Год назад +2

      The worst mass shooting ever, was with a shotgun. Last I heard...

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад

      ALL OF THEM!!! THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад

      ​@@castanza128 The worst mass shooting in us history is the Battle of Wounded Knee. Carried out by the US government in 1890 with single shot rifles, percussion cap revolvers, and other weapons not on the "assault weapons" list. They handed out medals of honor for killing unarmed women and children. Kinda like the attack on Waco.

  • @amyphillips3691
    @amyphillips3691 Год назад +2

    Screw Washington , I’ll Never spend A dollar there

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад

      A dollar??? It costs a fortune to survive in Washington! Governor Stalin has driven the cost of energy through the roof!

  • @xman577
    @xman577 Год назад +3

    Two lawsuits have already been dropped. This long will a stand, and they know it.

  • @xd3m0nxx25
    @xd3m0nxx25 Год назад +1

    Shall not be infringed
    Reverse this
    Civilian disarmament

  • @vincentcargile5026
    @vincentcargile5026 Год назад +4

    Like Democracks saying “We don’t want to take your guns, we JUST want to Regulate them”, Keep them locked in a safe, unloaded with the ammo locked in a separate safe and if you want to open the safe to look at it you must call the police chief to get permission. This is what DC passed. This bill is only the beginning.

    • @Jojo-vo4cu
      @Jojo-vo4cu Год назад

      Hahaha!😂Esai😂👋About time, since you guys wanna control a woman's body😘😘😘

  • @alrijini301
    @alrijini301 Год назад +1

    Then that representative doesn't need body guards and not carry any weapons on himself either

  • @sluggou812beotch
    @sluggou812beotch Год назад +3

    Inslee's goons all have semi auto rifles.

  • @calikid3336
    @calikid3336 Год назад +2

    This style of weapon is for self defence, not for mass murder

  • @tires2burn
    @tires2burn Год назад +6

    This only restricts the law abiding gun owners. The criminals and mentally ill will find ways to harm you.

  • @MrEcliptor
    @MrEcliptor Год назад +2

    Of course the protest was small, all the smart people didnt want to show their faces so that the Gestapo could identify them and pursue taking their guns.
    People have really holed up and allowed the anti gunners to do whatever they wanted. 😢

  • @CheekyChops710
    @CheekyChops710 Год назад +8

    Weapons of war are automatic. The rifles they sell to civilians are semi automatic. They have many applications. AR doesn’t stand for assault rifle that’s a made up term. AR stands for a company’s name who first patented the platform called armalite. The rifle round is used for accuracy and hunting. A pistol can cause the same amount of destruction as a rifle. U can have a plate carrier with 20 mags if a hand gun and retain more capacity than a rifle. Your laws make no sense.

    • @castanza128
      @castanza128 Год назад +3

      It really is a pointless argument anyway, because the 2nd amendment clearly covers "Weapons of war."

    • @rickerhart907
      @rickerhart907 Год назад

      Don't be giving them more excuses to ban semi auto pistols. That will be next on the agenda

    • @RCenal
      @RCenal Год назад

      ​@@castanza128 considering all weapons are weapons of war
      All the way down to rocks way before gins and bow and arrows were ever heard of

  • @AllFallBeforeMe
    @AllFallBeforeMe Год назад +2

    What exactly is an assault weapon?

    • @mattschmitt9924
      @mattschmitt9924 Год назад +1

      According to their list, it is a bunch of guns "in common use"

  • @jet3xi
    @jet3xi Год назад +13

    Not just semi-automatic rifles, but also pistols with any removable magazine - which means all handguns like glock are banned as well.

    • @sluggou812beotch
      @sluggou812beotch Год назад +4

      Actually it reads a pistol with a magazine that protrudes from an area other than the grip.

    • @bryandamkaer3646
      @bryandamkaer3646 Год назад

      they were directing it to AR platform pistols

    • @yrntmoney3745
      @yrntmoney3745 Год назад +1

      😂😂😂

  • @PSALM_6012
    @PSALM_6012 Год назад +2

    Buy more guns

  • @mrbiglez8299
    @mrbiglez8299 Год назад +10

    Haha weird we can’t protest on a Tuesday…… we are the ones at work keeping this state together. Inslee you shoulda tried to sign it on a Saturday!

  • @impulse-nati0n114
    @impulse-nati0n114 Год назад +2

    Man i can not WAIT till these people realize just what they are throwing away

  • @joeycrooker1282
    @joeycrooker1282 Год назад +3

    Ironically , they let the criminals free,,

  • @montanaspring7176
    @montanaspring7176 Год назад +1

    tax dollars to suppress my bill of rights... IM PISSED

  • @rb70383
    @rb70383 Год назад +8

    So awesome. Poor criminals. How dare innocent people protect themselves. Our only duty is to pay taxes.

  • @christopherwilliams5808
    @christopherwilliams5808 Год назад +2

    Amazing how people clap all while having their rights taken away. 🤣

  • @Outlander1221
    @Outlander1221 Год назад +7

    This is all about control !

  • @chrisshaw3970
    @chrisshaw3970 Год назад +1

    With the passing of the semi auto ban in Washington, I just read that it will be illegal to carry an AR style firearm in your vehicle unless you are a law enforcement officer or a member of the military. My question is what about the people who hunt with an AR style weapon can we still use them?

  • @seamac7564
    @seamac7564 Год назад +3

    Annnnnnd, expect this to have no impact on criminals; it does however, impact law-abiding citizens. Bravo Washington.....bravo.

  • @effu9375
    @effu9375 Год назад +1

    Time to move.

  • @user-xp3uw8id1q
    @user-xp3uw8id1q Год назад +8

    Because we work and they signed it on a Tuesday morning. This such BS.

  • @robertdenton6936
    @robertdenton6936 Год назад +1

    Let me get this straight. Fetnall is now legal, And the right to bear arms is illegal.?
    How cute, I love how the government is here to "help" people. So adorable.

  • @danrivers1949
    @danrivers1949 Год назад +5

    An assault weapon is a gun that can be switch from semi automatic to fully automatic like they have in the military. Your average, A.R. 15 is not an assault weapon so they’re banning guns that nobody has anyways, at least that’s what they would be banning if they were actually banning assault weapons

    • @HighFalutinTootin
      @HighFalutinTootin Год назад

      Assault weapon is a generic term the different types are semi automatic weapons and select fire/fully automatic weapons that's it

    • @dr.burtgummerfan439
      @dr.burtgummerfan439 Год назад +3

      "Assault weapon" is any weapon the fascists don't like.

    • @HighFalutinTootin
      @HighFalutinTootin Год назад

      @@dr.burtgummerfan439 i wonder what's next...if a crook robs a bank are they gonna ban everyone's money?? Because that's basically what is going on they are punishing everyone for the actions of criminals that they repeatedly released while defunding police and promoting BLM/Antifa mostly marxist riots

    • @yrntmoney3745
      @yrntmoney3745 Год назад +1

      @@HighFalutinTootin no such thing as assault weapons

  • @jshoots1st
    @jshoots1st Год назад +2

    This isn't going to stop anything at all never has and never will

  • @Ellis-news
    @Ellis-news Год назад +9

    Lawsuits in bound as we speak

  • @tomlee6263
    @tomlee6263 Год назад +1

    My youngest brother was accidentally shot by a negligent discharge, but I don't think a gun ban would make any difference. I still believe in our Constitutional right to own & bear arms...

    • @88Expert
      @88Expert Год назад

      Only an American would say " gun bans make no difference" but look at the rest of the world

  • @yearight2995
    @yearight2995 Год назад +5

    Not about saving lives it's about having control

    • @commiesnzombies
      @commiesnzombies Год назад +1

      Democrats always looking to put the jack boot on everyone's neck, the founding fathers warned us

  • @Ram-re5em
    @Ram-re5em Год назад +3

    I will live in states that follow the second amendment. I would not eve visit a state with these horrible gun laws

  • @Ram-re5em
    @Ram-re5em Год назад +1

    It’s a horrible law

  • @spetsru2906
    @spetsru2906 Год назад +4

    Lol. State is led by a joke. Nothing but wasted time and tax money.

  • @rustyprice8690
    @rustyprice8690 Год назад +1

    Traitors

  • @reubenmorris487
    @reubenmorris487 Год назад +10

    Glad his personal security has the very same type of weapons he just tried to ban.

    • @ClaudeHarrington-ds4ut
      @ClaudeHarrington-ds4ut Год назад

      Nope, His and his cronies will have true Automatic rifles for their security forces.

    • @grizzybear9111
      @grizzybear9111 Год назад

      i doubt that but nice try

    • @blanexblaze6510
      @blanexblaze6510 Год назад

      ​@grizzybear9111 The narrator literally said that everyone exepct for police and military can't buy these guns

  • @Shaddowbanned
    @Shaddowbanned Год назад +1

    What's a assault rifle?