Muse - Butterflies & Hurricanes (live) REACTION & REVIEW! FIRST TIME WATCHING!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- Muse Fans.....FEELIN' YOU!!! Tonight we're coming back to Muse, with a live performance of a song entitled "Butterflies & Hurricanes". FULL DISCLOSURE: I have obviously heard this song before, I've done a reaction to it already. However this is a live performance. Therefore I will NOT be scoring, evaluating, reviewing, or reacting to the song itself in any way. I will ONLY be scoring, evaluating, reviewing, and reacting to the LIVE PERFORMANCE. How's this one gonna go? Only one way to find out...
Come on in, enjoy the show...I'll see you inside.
Scoring System Guide
10 = Perfection (Unobtainable)
9.0 - 9.9 = Awesome, Amazing
8.0 - 8.9 = Great
7.0 - 7.9 = Really Good
6.0 - 6.9 = Pretty Good
5.0 - 5.9 = O.k.
4.0 - 4.9 = Not So Good
3.0 - 3.9 = Pretty Bad
2.0 - 2.9 = Really Bad
1.0 - 1.9 = Horrible, Awful
0.0 - 0.9 = A Travesty, An Affront To Nature
Link to Original Video Here:
• Muse - Butterflies and...
My Patreon Page, where you can MAKE REQUESTS (As a Bronze Tier Member or higher) as well as view ALL the videos I try to post that RUclips is forced to block, can be found here: www.patreon.co...
(Please note, you must be at least a Bronze Tier Member to be able to make fresh requests. All requests must be made on the Patreon page.)
My Twitter: / bassist4aw
My Instagram (I've just started learning how to use it): / davidheretic666
Our P.O. Box (yeah, we listened to you all and we got one):
P.O.Box #355
19360 Rinaldi St
Porter Ranch, CA. 91326
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. I have no intent on claiming this music for my own, I'm simply reacting to the video and giving my constructive criticism and feedback. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
Few things to consider here:
a) Muse dont really do crowd interaction eg talking to the crow because it's just not their style. They even mentioned it in some interviews that they felt it was embarrassing/cringe to do so. 95% of the time they dont talk at all in between the songs. All you get during live concert is a non-stop full of energy life performance that worth every penny of your ticket.
b) But only recently for some of the songs they did it as it fits to do so. Eg new version of Starlight live being played with Matt on vocal (+interacting with the crowd) without playing the guitar. Me as an old fan really hate it as it felt too pop.
c) Most of the Muse songs are way way better off without the interaction with crowd. My point is it depends on the atmosphere of the songs/music and the messages they intend to deliver within the songs. I get it if it's Panic Station but the interaction with crowd in B&H is a big no bro.
Anw thanks for the honest opinion and I respect it.
Personally, I think bands that have lots of crowd interaction, or all the other things David wants, are normally just covering up their lack of back catalogue to play - or the lack of songs they are actually any good at playing live. Muse are known for their stage shows - you can’t take one song from a set list of 20/25 songs and give an opinion on their live offering as a whole. Also, they can’t go crazy with the crowd on every song - I was at this gig and was lucky enough to see them play Unintended, however, I can’t say I was disappointed that Matt Bellamy didn’t jump into the crowd when playing it, and that’s because that song doesn’t call for it - it was beautiful to see him stood there playing it on acoustic guitar! (So I guess I’m saying there are exceptions, even to your preferred stage show) Watch the Simulation Theory film and then tell us they don’t put on a show!! Lacklustre - behave! Music is king and they are in the top 3 bands in the world for musicianship and live production - they haven’t won as many best live act awards for no reason!!
100%. I saw them live at Reading 2017 and it was honestly the greatest concert experience of my life.
@@luxetveritas9196 same
Generally disagree with his take here. There’s a lot more to live performance than a lot of pyro and holding the mic out to the crowd. And This song is not just played as it is in the studio version - there’s a section added here just for the live performance that’s not even in the original. How does that not get brownie points for performance. I think that this goes pretty hard...and I’m sure there was plenty of fireworks throughout the whole show, not every song should be judged on its inclusion or lack thereof.
Surely live performance means how it’s sang/played too...how many rock bands are busting out classical piano solos mid song and hitting notes like those all night. Quite a harsh review on a pretty stellar job by muse. But I usually like David’s takes. Think he just made his mind up early on this - 30 seconds in and he seemed sold on his opinion.
yeah, ouch for that salts 😪
I think there is a disconnect, I respect your opinion, but I do not give a rats ass how a band interacts with the crowd, all that matters is the standard and quality of how they play live, that's what live music is about, I think crowd interaction, talking before the song, production gadgets, are all a way for a bad band to hide behind, all that matters is how good you are at playing your instruments and singing. Everything else is irrelevant, in my opinion. I guess to you, and others, you don't take account of how well they transfer the studio song to a live rendition?
Alex - I couldn't agree more. How it sounds is key, everything else is irrelevant IMO.
I agree. I don't care how often a band talks to the crowd before a song, how often they get the crowd to clap along, how much pyro they have, etc. If they're playing the song well and with energy (which I'd say Muse is definitely doing here) then the band is putting on a great show. I think all that other stuff is just superficial elements bands that can't play well like to hide behind to mask their subpar playing. If bands do add them to their shows, cool, but are they necessary? Not really.
@@brandonb.5304 Yeah David just has a very different opinion on what constitutes a good live performance, it seems that he doesn't take the quality of the musicianship into account, or he assumes that a band will play it great live no matter what, but I've been to plenty of shows where I was disappointed by the vocals or instruments, never really been disappointed because there weren't lazers and pre song jokes lol
@@alexshadowfax1119 Yeah, I'd rather bands cut out the chit chat and play one or more two songs instead. I don't need them to have one-sided conversations with the crowd.
@@brandonb.5304 Agreed, I don't enjoy matt as frontman because of his charisma and witty banter
Boring live performance to watch? I don’t get you with this one , like what do you want them to do . They are known for incredible energy . I was at this concert and it was absolutely incredible
To be fair, David was not at this concert. All he has to go by is this video. The stage design translated poorly to video for me. Surely it was amazing if you were there. But the video does not capture the nostalgia your memories do.
Edit: The stage was probably fantastic at the stadium. Not knocking anything about it. But it clearly wasn't designed with proper camera angles for a DVD shoot in mind.
this make this underrated song of them remain underrated, buried like a HIDDEN GEM deep inside the earth crust 😪
I usually love your reactions, whether negative or positive, but I'm not really understanding what you want the band to do to "blow you away." The song being like 45 seconds in, I'm not sure ANY performance of a song is going to immediately blow you away. That's some pretty lofty expectations. Not everyone is going to react to songs the same way, so obviously Muse fans are going to immediately be engaged, but I'm struggling to understand your criteria for live performances where the lights and pyro matter more than the band's musicianship. In order to judge a live performance, you have to take into account how well a band plays a song--not the song itself--but their musicianship. You don't really do that here. You're focused on lights, and pyro, and the crowd clapping, which to me is pretty irrelevant if the band is killing the playing of the song. Nonetheless, appreciate what you do.
I don’t know either what he wants. A nuclear bomb explosion maybe. Got to remember this was about 10 yrs plus ago. Crowd into it straight away 🤷🏼♂️
I know I’m late, but this 100%. I love David Heretic for his honesty in all his reactions, but I could never understand how he just blatantly disregards musicianship in live performances
For me, as a Muse fan, i don’t go to their concerts to see Matt clapping or chearing up the crowd.. its not really their style i guess (sometimes yes). I come to their shows because of the energy, the music and the amazing technology and stages.. and they always give me what i want :)
Exactly. I've seen them 15 times and never once went away feeling that was a poor concert.
How has anyone not recommended Animals live from Roma 2013? He wants production value, that whole performance is A+ production AND he hasn't reviewed the song yet. Should be top of the list!
Yeah the whole Rome show production and interaction is really good, I'd suggest supremacy and after animals I'd really like to see him do the harmonica and Knights performance...
@@iad77 He already reacted to Knights of Cydonia from that Rome gig, fyi. As well as supremacy...
@@wewantthecup I think Knights was blocked though. Not sure about Supremacy.
@@brandonmeng3998 You can view it on his patreon, it's only a dollar a month.
And correction: His Supremacy reaction was not from Rome, but he did react to it already.
"Survival" from live Rome Olympic Stadium
Rome Olympic Stadium has a bunch of great production live songs by Muse. What you said, Animals, and Knights of Cydonia are all top tier!
Yes please!
Muse interacts with the crowd in more specific situations. That's why there are "Muse by request" shows and other shows for that. And honestly? I've never seen anyone complain about them. These are shows of pure energy, it's not their style to interrupt to talk or point the microphone at the audience, for example.
I've seen many bands live and it's true that Muse are the ones that interact the least with the crowd, but that's just their style. Even with little to no crowd interaction they still manage to win best live act pretty much every year, and people leave the concert saying they're the best band they've seen. I couldn't care less if they talk to the crowd or not. They're incredible musicians and Matt's got a huge stage presence even though he's shy and awkward off stage.
yesss
I can't speak for everyone but personally I think you missed the point. Don't get me wrong, your opinion is as valid as everyone else's and I love your videos specially because you are hard to impress sometimes, I respect that. But i'm convinced that when people requested to watch the live version didn't mean that the interaction with the crowd would blow your mind, and everyone who knows Muse knows that. Muse shows don't include "woooaaa woooaaa", clapping or talking to the crowd, but a unstoppable chain of energy and amazing songs. What people meant was simply that their live versions sound much better than the studio versions, and you don't seem to get that. You proved that when you said you heard no deviations from the studio version right after a bridge three times longer than in the studio song hahaha that's Muse's interaction with the crowd: improving their own songs and surprising people with their own songs. If people wanted to blow your mind with production and interaction with the crowd they'd request "mercy" or any intro or any show, there' are plenty of muse shows that"d blow your mind. But that's not the kind of mindblowing that people requested, they wanted to show you an improved version of a magnificent song played like no one else can.
Once again, as a musician I LOVE your reviews! This is just my opinion!
I'm reviewing your review hahahah
Cheers!!!
I'm a lucky guy who has had the chance to watch live a lot of incredibles music bands, and Muse twice. I recognize to you that they are very cold whit they audience, only a few interactions, always like a swiss clock, no time to improvise. And I love Muse!
If you want big interaction with the crowd you should see them in the Live at Rome 2013 concert. I suggest the song Survival, which was the official song of the London Olympics. Matt runs in a strip that goes almost to the middle of the stadium.
He reacted to Survival at the Olympics
@@amassaic awesome! I loved that performance.
Muse don't need to physically prompt their crowds to interact, the crowds do that themselves. Been to numerous live concerts and that neven been a concern, it's about well played music live! 👍
I like your honesty here.... I don't really watch reaction videos that much but if I do then I want it to be authentic.
You've got a subscription from me Sir 👌
Thanks for the great reaction and candor, DH. If it were me suggesting a live performance, I'd have steered you to the one played during the Shepard's Bush Empire 2017 charity show (starting @ 26:58 into the show) instead of the Wembley version, but I would have done so without making any promises. Frankly, you may have had the same reaction. Keep up the good work!
Great song, great performance, i think this was their first big stadium show recorded for dvd and they wanted to make no mistakes and perform as best they can maybe thats the reason they dont interact too much with the crowd, honestly i would do the same too much things to worry about while playing lol
Pd: you should provide the link of your first reaction maybe that will help people understand 👌
What else did you expect? A circus with elephant? 🤣
David, if you're looking for stage craft and production values then look at the most recent tour. Some absolutely incredible effectd, giant animatromic puppets etc.
But as others have said. Muse seem to be about the perfection of nailing the song and that energy as opposed to showmanship outside of their musical ability.
Animals at Rome Olympic Stadium is another good one because of the story behind the song (us being surfs to rich bankers/the elite)
Grouchy Grouchy lol.. Someone got your hopes up way to much. BUT Do you not take into account how WELL they play the song live as compared to the recorded version? Because to me, whats astonishing about Muse is how dead on they are live.
They have a new song coming out on Thursday. Is it possible for a live reaction when it drops?
If you want crowd interaction I would recommend Undisclosed Desires from Rome or Mercy live (simulation theory tour). Also Animals live from Rome is a great performance too if you want something with more narrative structure and Follow Me (Rome) if you want something with more passion and energy.
Also, if you want a studio song to listen to, I recommend Glorious, its often overlooked as a song, due to it being only a b-side but I think it's a very beautiful song idk though.
The guys from Muse are real musicians. Their control over music is amazing. I can hear not high and feel like I'm just like Pink Floyd. Now regardless of how the latter has acted lately in recent years public (their public expressions), they still did some good song.. In the PAST. While Muse didn't lose the grip yet.
You are at it. That performance is superb 👏
This is great! I love this reaction almost as much as I love the song! Appreciate your honesty Dave as always, even tho I would honestly say Muse has been the best live performance I've seen (and I've seen a few) ... But I truly believe you do have to be there to properly appreciate it (with phones down of course 😜).
If any Muse track is worth reviewing live with more confidence of a great score it would have to be Knights Of Cydonia. But I'm gonna stop short of requesting it and just suggest checking it out in your own time.
Cheers again for your honest and entertaining content.
He has reviewed Knights of Cydonia
@@wewantthecup - So I noticed. Looks like it was blocked tho .... I wonder if it was the live in Rome one?
@@Trikkeeroy Yep, it was the Rome live DVD indeed. It's on his patreon in full
@@wewantthecup - Yeh nice one! Just went over there and dropped a comment. Much better score for that one.
These comments are honestly like a broken record for this sort of thing. I get it; both sides of dave and the muse fans. Both are valid in their own points. He's entitled to his opinion and so is everyone else, but this is sort of HIS channel after all, and he even prefaces it by his own standards. So lets just take it as it is and have a good rest of the day! Thanks dave for keeping it real and being genuine with us!
(Nobody said you can't have constructive discourse in the comments. Saying "this one sucks should have done this one" and repetitive negativity does not equate to healthy discourse. "Taking it as it is" just means to not overthink or take too seriously because we are here to have fun with Dave. Not start polemics for sake of it...unless I'm missing something.)
Keta - Folks are allowed to disagree and discuss it. That's how a discord works and it's the point of the comments section; to discuss the video and offer your own thoughts and feelings. So long as everyone is being respectful, what's the harm? If Dave didn't want us to discuss his videos he would have turned off the comments. If you're watching a video that is based on someone's opinions, then obviously it's their opinions that you'll discuss in the comments. I really don't see what the problem with that is.
9:17 That's why people are telling you that you are missing out on the live version. Because you might like it even more than the studio. What's the big deal? Also, I find the visuals from the live performance completely inspiring. The production, the crowd reaction, the band's stage presence, every aspect can be moving. Most importantly, I think you can feel the passion that the band is projecting.
I normally like your reactions even when they are negative but this one makes absolutely no sense to me. If you're going to revisit a song live I think it makes sense to listen to the studio version beforehand because this is different. Secondly I don't think handclapping and pyrotechnics makes for a good performance. Weird to judge it on that.
First of all thanks for your honesty David, I disagree a little in this one but my thoumb up is here 👍 as always. They have their moments and better songs to do that, but this one with that "dark atmosphere" or whatever you like to describe it, I don't hope that much interaction to be honest, although I do hope some little changes on the song like they did, we could debate that. At a perspective as a Muse fan, it's a great performance and we like it this way, that doesn't mean this can't improve though. I know you don't speak for every muse live song but watch undisclosed desires and starlight at rome olympic stadium, I think those will like you more. Sorry for the grammar, don't wanna try to fix it this time 😅and thanks again.
I think there is more to a performance that this definition but at the same time, I totally respect this view. I was at Glastonbury (2002?) watching Stereophonics headline the main stage and I walked away after 5 songs as I could have just listened to the CD - the performance was note perfect, but there was nothing either audibly or visually extra. For some people, a perfect reproduction of the CD in a live setting would be a good performance, a sign of technical proficiency by the band and sound engineers, but it doesn't do it for me, so I left and I saw Ozomatli on the Jazz Stage who were hugely entertaining, and took audience interaction to a whole new level - I have no idea if there were any bad notes, I was having too much fun to care.
This is a good performance, but I will agree about the lack of crowd interaction and there being better performances by Muse. However, I think there is more audibly in this, the sound is great, it seems a little heavier than the studio version, the guitar riff before the piano was different and much longer, the end of the piano section was audibly more dramatic as well as visually. Now, do you have to be a Muse nerd to notice those things? I don't think so, but its probably fair to argue that you do have to be reasonably familiar with the song. For people familiar, these, arguably smaller, changeups and technical flourishes can surprise and delight and make a good performance great. The stage set looks great too, maybe this suffers a little for appearing to still be daylight so you don't get full production value from the stage lighting, and while the interactive energy wasn't there, it did look like the band very much were, they were not just going through the motions, and as I've said, it sounded great too (and I've also seen performances from other bands with crown interaction and energy but a sucky sound, either because the mix was bad or because they just didn't play/sing that well and that doesn't help).
Anyway, respect your opinion as always, and I'll be honest, after this and the Stockholm syndrome, I wouldn't blame you if you said no to these re-reaction requests from here on.
A very different performances for the lengthy list (no I don't expect your mind to be blown, or 10/10's, it's not even rock/guitar focused music, you might hate it, but I promise you will see a hardworking band engaged with their audience):
Faithless, We come 1 (Glastonbury 2002) ruclips.net/video/QNMt-oG24PY/видео.html
It's hard to gauge a live 'Performance' from a pro-shot DVD recording.
Even more so when you take 1 song out of the context of a 26 song set.
I'd still take this over Bruce Dickinson's 'SCREAM FOR ME [INSERT CITY]' Every 30 seconds.
I actually appreciate these kind of evaluations. Also, I don't know if you already talked about it before, but are you like a session musician and bands hire you on tour or do you play "permanently" in some band? And if its the second what band do you play in? Thanks in advance and keep up your honesty, its why we watch!
I do both. I am currently working with a couple of projects/bands on a regular basis, and I am also a session bassist/sub bassist for hire. I don't ever give out the names of the bands I play in, because I don't want people accusing me of using this channel as an advertising platform for those bands.
I don’t really understand what else Matt could have done. There’s literally no other opportunities for Matt to clap or anything like that apart from the one time Matt did interact with the crowd.
I would much rather see Matt getting into the music rather than walking up to the bassist, drummer, keyboarder or even crowd. Matts movement onstage is engaging in itself.
He likes the smoke effect . no need to comment on his opinion
Man I do really enjoy your reviews but I have to respectfully disagree with you about live music. I have been to many concerts and not once have I looked at the stage and thought " wow they really aren't moving around enough". Honestly, I really don't care at all. I go to a concert to see how well they can play the songs live; it's an audio experience, not a visual one. A lot of the prancing about stage that you enjoy can come across as very disingenuous to me, borderline cringe worthy. It often feels fake and forced. This is a live performance of music, not a play. Only the sound should matter IMO. Look at the size of that stadium. How many of those people in the back can even see the stage?
I don't think it makes any sense whatsoever when you say it's not about the song. It's ONLY about the song and how well it sounds. Again, music, not theatre.
He has a very strange way of enjoying live music or evaluating it, I also think that he's never going to be a big muse fan, lots have tried giving him recommendations, it's just not his type of music.
@@alexshadowfax1119 I don't want him to be a Muse fan. I want to see his reactions to great Muse performances.
David's not going anywhere, so maybe if people stop requesting duplicate reviews (that aren't even great versions, SS and B&H from HAARP don't hold a candle to Glastonbury 2004) he won't be uptight about Muse.
He's given them some good scores, by the way, I don't think he dislikes them at all. I think Muse fans can just get annoying (and I do not exclude myself haha)
Uh guys... He's allowed have an opinion?
HAARP does suffer a little with rigidity. This is the bands first ever stadium endeavor, and it's not perfect
@@JDC701 Of course he is, as am I mate.
@@JDC701 You don't find it odd to judge a live performance based almost solely on visuals and crowd interaction? He made almost no mention of the quality of the musicianship. Taking into account how well musicians played a song live is a pretty integral part of judging a live performance, so I think people just find it odd that his criteria are based almost solely on visuals.
For Muse, this is definitely a more subdued performance, especially compared to what they do in their more recent live shows.
Bands doing live performances shouldn't do alot of crowd interaction in my opinion, at end of the day they are there to play their songs live, I would rather they put all their effort into playing the music well than interacting with crowds, and you are more likely to get a better performance if they just play rather than distract themselves with crowd.
I think they're more musicians than a band, hence I don't really expect them to interact and be showmen. That's just me. Get what Ur saying tho.
Oh, this is the song creating the tirade about stage presence I had to go through in newer video?
Personally I don't feel this song needs any of that - it just won't play along with the lyrics and theme. It feels energetic with a feeling of push. If you already listened to the song, it won't bring you anything new (well, apart from the added middle part).
EDIT: Plus one noteworthy thing is - it's ONE song from a hour and three quaters long GIG. We're looking at a single piece, because we don't react to a whole gig, but that means it's still cut out of the whole experience. For Muse, I think that will take part of "magic". Nowhere near as if you cut a song from The Wall gig, where you lose story, but still a part of experience as a whole.
I agree if people say "this will strip all your clothes off of you" it will be underwhelming unless you really love the song. Personally I like Muse live better than their studio versions, which are sometimes kinda overproduced to my taste. However they are already capable studio "musicians" which makes the live performance only slightly better. It won't make it more charming than it already was.
EDIT2:
Oh, speaking about (stage) production and presence - man, you are just creating the confusion of how people don't undestand what you want yourself - I noticed that in more videos. People are stupid (hello), we can't read minds, sometimes our imagination is too subjugated that we don't have an idea what would be a good move... You have the stage (pun intended) to teach us and get to know you, because in the end it's your opinion.
I would like to know what songs blow you away. I mean Butterflies and Hurricanes isn’t my favorite Muse song by a long shot, not even top 25. But I would really like to see a list that you compile together.
My personal favorite live show by Muse is the 2017 Shepherd Bush Empire show. Muscle Museum and Showbiz out of that show are by far the best Muse performances.
Showbiz is the GOAT
I wish they had just requested a new song. I mostly agree with your opinion
I'd say that attempting to only review a live performance by ignoring the quality of the individual instrumental performances, the vocals and the overall sound of the song is like a movie critic trying to review a film whilst blindfolded. Yes, obviously it would be a shame if the dialogue and sound design of the movie is crap, but then again that is not how the media is intended to be experienced. This is by no means my favourite muse song or even my favourite live performance of it, but I think that when people ask you to *listen* to a different version, the intent is that you will compare them in full. I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but I just think that an adjustment would please both you and the fans wanting the reaction more.
This being said if it an energetic and crowd interaction you want take a look at some of their performances live at the Astoria, particularly Uno is one that comes to mind
I was there… At least 0.1 of that score belongs to me!
For me, if I'm being "perfectly honest, it's a 20 out of 10 so...
React to their new single wont stand down plss 😩
You never mentioned the interaction with the crowd in any of your previous Muse reactions!
blackout at wembley 2007, stockholm symdrome at las vegas 2013, metal medley at the simulation tour, undisclosed desired at rome 2013, and mercy at the drones tour.
You'll not find anything more spectacular in more than 20 years of concerts, and even then it's not surpass the production and theatricality of Rammstein 😅
If you don't like it dude, you don't like it! This song might melt MY face off, but I feel little/nothing when I listen to Metallica. People need to realize that even if you don't love the song, they still can!
Might need to hear everything Metallica before you say that :P
That's my personal journey - I know I dont like certain bands based on genre or songwriting, but I actively make the effort to listen to every album to see what I DO like about them :)
In all honesty, Dave is trying to get through the backlog of requests and these live versions of songs, all of which he has already reviewed, sets this goal back and I think we all want to see fresh reactions to songs Dave had not heard. Am I wrong?
Also, a lot of cognitive dissonance going on in the comments. It's ok guys, no one is stopping you enjoying it yourself.
You're not wrong. I also think people have no clue what's already on David's queue, since he doesn't have a public queue we can see, so some people don't even know they're requesting a song already planned (and in some cases, songs he has already published reactions for)
Dave great reaction again, you know I love muse and I can't blame you for the score. This is a great concert, but gotta be honest not my favorite, although Muse is not the type of band that interacts a lot and they always have high energy, gotta admit some songs on this concert are just not there.
I also don't know why people keep on asking to react the same songs but live...Yes I love them live but cmon! They have 9 albums including hullabaloo each with at least 12 songs in it 90% of them great and they keep on asking the same song you reacted...gee...
Anyway once again thanks!
You were determined to hate this, dunno why you bothered watching
No escojas canciones que ya has reaccionado entonces :(
Sería mejor probar otras sugerencias de Muse antes de volver a reaccionar a otra presentación de alguna canción ya subida al canal. No estoy del todo acuerdo, pero respeto tu opinión !
Esperando con ansias cuál será la siguiente reacción.
No tiene que ver, no esta tomando en cuenta la cancion, la cancion en si creo que llego al 9.
I am sad, not because of your reaction, but because people are requesting duplicates that are not great live versions. I do LIKE this version, but the stage setup translated awfully to video, and the editing did not help. Even the audio mix is off on HAARP (the dvd this came from, as well as the other duplicate muse song you reviewed, Stockholm Syndrome).
I know you always get "but have you heard THIS version blah blah blah", but it's because some requests are disappointing when there are better examples.
How could these Muse fans suggest those two songs from HAARP and not Glastonbury 2004?
Sorry, I am annoyed with the request, not your reaction.
Personally, I hate Matt's guitar tone from the Absolution tour--it's tinny and hollow sounding. I much prefer his guitar tone from OoS and then BH&R on. And the piano he used on this tour and subsequent tours is so much more full and rich than the keyboards he was using on the Absolution tour. Matt may not be acting like a lunatic on stage like he was in prior years, but ultimately, who cares? I care about the musicianship, not whether the frontman is going wild on stage.
But the crowd of Glastonbury 2004 was quite dead
I'm a longtime muse fan and I hate this song except for the piano part 🤣 I don't get why it's so popular with fans
People should probably stop requesting live performances of previous reviewed songs and especially stop hyping them up like crazy. They never live up to the hype and I don’t think it’s worth it.
David, here's a request
reacts to "Massacration - Metal Milf (Clipe Oficial)"
is from a brazilian metal band
pay attention to the clip it's very funny
Please react to 2021 em uma música
Maybe they should have requested Panic Station, the live version with everyone dressed up on stage. Would be interesting to see your reaction to that.
Yes, that Tokyo Zepp version might do it for him. 🤣
GT - Is that the concert where they do I Love You Baby and there are lots of Asian ladies and folks dressed up in costume?
He reacted to Panic Station
@@miralex67 not the version I wrote about.
@@gmon78 yeah sounds like the same one.
Crazy view here. If you want just a show, they may as well just mime and dance around like idiots. A live performance is not just about looks, it’s the musicianship. You seem to be way off in what you are requesting of a live performance.
Glastonbury 2004 kick-ass this version.
Muse, after Absolution, have lost their hard and raw sound.
Didnt realize these hacky radiohead ripoffs had so many dedicated fans.
This was ok
I'm curious how you would handle "baby love child"
Why are we doing this a second time now? One person hyped this up to death, why?
Pressure featuring the UCLA bruins marching band , maybe? possibly?
That performance was flat unfortunately 🤘🎸🎸
All the recordings from this show in my opinion are some of their worst. Like it's at such a weird point for the band where from albums 1-3 they were playing smaller stages and then from 5 onwards it's all about the show ( I mean if you see some of the stuff from the latest simulation theory tours it's insane the among of stage production there is) but this being the tour for the 4th album I believe just sits in this weird middle ground where they are tryna become all about the show but aren't quite there yet so it just feels disconnected. Plus the vocals and general sound from the recordings of this show are pretty meh in comparison to others. I believe the live Stockholm syndrome one you done was from this and I don't think you were a huge fan (if I remember correctly).
Muse are boring.
Says the dude who listens to Radiohead lmao. So lame