Want to help support this channel? Check out my books on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Will-Jordan/e/B00BCO7SA8%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share Subscribe on Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheCriticalDrinker Subscribe on SubscribeStar: www.subscribestar.com/the-critical-drinker
SJW and Politics ruins the things we love in the west. Focus on “diversity”, feminism, anti white, anti male, use feelings as an argument, ignore facts and logic, etc. Anime and manga is booming everywhere as the Japanese understand logics and facts in business.
And these weren't super smart dogs either, all they did was cover themselves in soot and climb onto a truck. But she's a woman, so she has to be brilliant.
@@ffordegroupie4931 ... What are you talking about? In the original story the dogs and the cat whose kittens Cruella drowned literally premeditated Cruella's financial ruin. They are not normal dogs. It's a fairy tale. They have humanized intelligence.
"Poison them, drown them, bash them on the head...I don't care how you kill the little beasts, but do it, and do it now!" Misunderstood antihero material right there.
@@leighbelk769 Her mother was a janitor who got locked in the fire station kennel for a long weekend and when they came back on Tuesday there was just a pack of blood soaked dalmatians gnawing on her bones
@@MrZebub I don't think so, 'bashing' is done with a blunt object such as a club. Bashing on the head would kill them by shattering their skulls and the fur would remain intact. Hunters try not to damage the pelt in anyway (such as shooting arrows into the animal) because it decreases the furs value. So bashing is the most effect way to kill without damaging the pelt
If you hadn’t watched the film, SPOILERS The line “I am woman, hear me roar” is an excuse Cruella uses in the film to justify herself beating up little boys at her school who only teased her
@@Timothy_-ve2zp I mean she’s a fuckin villain. Sounds like something a villain would say to try and justify her actions. It’s a villain origin story you dummy
Dogs are overrated and spread many diseases mostly now some crazy sick owners who love dogs so much start to have intercourses with them. Hollywood is obsessed with dogs that’s why they told us from young age to get a dog they are you best friends. Best friends don’t kill children more than snakes and bark at every neighbor they see. Simply it become your best friend if you feed it like any animal they only care about themselves and will like you if you feed them, a simple animal with simple basic needs don’t need clothes or anything like humans need beside food sleeping breeding comfort that’s it. Media is obsessed with dogs and don’t care about natural animals who contribute in the echo system with natural breeding selection, they always showed cats are bad now they found that they can make profit from them as well so they started changing ideas, they want your love for money those who are responsible of the multi billion dollar pet industry
@@desertmoonlee6631 I really don't think the first part about dogs was necessary (I'm more of a cat person but still🗿) I am upset though that cats are always framed as the bad guys:(
@@violetdots As a dog and a cat person, I personally think it's funny, just how I think it's funny that the digs are usually the stupid ones and the ones that scare cats when neither is necessarily true either.
Watch Disney Channel's Descendants. That does a great job of building up female _and_ male characters with depth and flaws who start out as villains but learn to be heroes, but also does not have them begin as too irredeemable for us to root for them anyway. It also finds a rare good way to update classic animated Disney fairytales for modern audiences, by showing us why being good and evil are much more complicated than the way classic Disney films initially depicted it by showing Mal's struggle between both sides of morality.
fr this is what i disliked about the movie. you can literally see her lowkey manipulate and control the other two guys just so she can get her revenge going (kinda selfish) and i thought that the conflict would be unfolded more in depth but it just kinda ended with the dude saying "ok ill do this shit again bc we're friends yay"
It's called getting complacent or too big for one's boots. Workplaces are full of people who think they are so smart only to end their careers over something so small.
@@pangare655 Yet another defender of this movie. Look, if you like it, pop off. But the point of this film is to attempt to redeem an unredeemable character.
@@pangare655 its not a remake its a prequel. she may not kill a single puppy here but she does attempt to kill puppies in the future, foreshadowed by the dalmatians in this movie.
The Lion King is ironically based! when Strong Patriarchal (Republican) men rule there is plenty...When weak 'inclusive ' (Democrats) rule, jobs dissappear and are given to foreign interests
Scar is based off Claudius, but he was a villain. However he was a lot less evil than Scar, so I could see a POV where he starts off anti-heroic and is driven to evil instead of being completely evil.
I didn't laugh out loud, but this is such a clever play on the quote that I just can't help but respect your wit. A quality RUclips comment, who wouldya thought.
Yeah she’s a simple character to get you don’t need a whole movie to explain why she acts when it was in the original, also really Disney making the women who wants to skin puppies for her own gain? You want to make that sympathetic? No wounded Disney because your the same! (Sorry for the rant)
I disagree that Disney are trying to recapture the magic of their glory days. They're not trying at all. They're just putting out half hearted remakes and prequels where all the money goes into politically correct recasting and soulless special effects.
Soulless special effects do indeed consume a lot of money. Politically correct recasting might actually be cheaper than the alternative, for one usually casts a bunch of newcomers for that.
There’s actually a disdain toward their legacy. That’s why we see them deconstructed, because it’s “fixing” the problems. Lion King treated like a documentary. Beauty and the Beast fixed Belle by giving her inventing prowess, having her intend to escape her life debt exchange, a town who didn’t actually like Gaston they were just paid, a diverse poor provincial town in an era with slavery, making LeFou “gay”… Maleficent men bad, mother figure love breaking a traditional curse requiring “true love’s kiss” regurgitation of Frozen’s nonsense. They hate their legacy. They hate their fans. But they want money, and people are too dumb to stop watching these trash movies which have mostly made a billion each. They see it to wax nostalgia about the original, so all these turds make money off the original. That’s why Dumbo flopped. Nobody wanted a Dumbo movie, because nobody ever even talks about it outside reeing over the crows being racist.
@@elvickRULES The thing is when you are trying to be "right" all the time then it loses it's magic. The bits that should be reasonable seem unreasonable and the bits that should be unreasonable are made too logical that they ruin the magic. Movies are products of their time so they don't necessarily need to be "fixed" because no one is going to make a move with those values today.
In China, it is the state that rules everything. They ensure they do brilliantly at trade, they ensure corporatist oligarchs don't gain too much power (like breaking up Jack Ma's business when he took it upon himself to criticise state economical policy - f u, you're a business owner, not the country's leader, stfu) and are establishing a system where people are getting richer while the state doesn't dissipate. The opposite of the west, where there is increasingly smaller tax revenue to the point where health services can't manage nastier respitory infections, unelected oligarchs dictate state policy and are in charge of all major political parties, making all elections a sham at best. China does do nasty stuff, only to be expected from a place where state is top dog, but at least they're not pu***fying men and turning them into pathetic latte-drinking corposlaves. I'm starting to gain more respect for them than for the west, which at this point, is in its final groans of degeneracy
C'mon man, it's just part of their culture to be racists yellow supremacists that have ethnic cleansing camps, and we should respect them for it, not hold them accountable for their actions.
My reaction to this movie's existence was one single word: Why? Cruella DeVil is not just a one-dimensional villain, she is the quintessential one-dimensional villain. She was written to be one-dimensional specifically because 101 Dalmatians is a story that is told from the dogs' point of view. She has literally the same role as a stereotypical cartoon dog catcher except better, specifically because she is definitively evil (holy crap, that lousy 90s live action remake at least got that part right). The movie's existence is also proof that nobody at Disney actually believes in feminism, and is just using it as a cheap marketing ploy. Because nobody who actually does believe that "I am woman, hear me roar" is such a bestest ever slogan would want to tell you that the woman chanting it turns out to be a puppy murderer. This movie has no reason to exist, its underlying concept is so extraordinarily terrible that the actual presentation of the film is irrelevant. But the presentation of the film is probably awful too, considering Disney's live action remake track record.
I was about to go into my usual rant about how, if a character were truly one-dimensional, you wouldn't be able to see them. Bad characters are two-dimensional, good characters are three-dimensional. But Cruella is so skinny, you're just about right.
Considering the feminist movement kicked off with "Let's blow up buildings and kill people to get privileges we haven't earned and won't take the same responsibility as the men," I'd say that at least is in keeping.
@@viddork That's probably why they gave her that insanely huge fur coat, easier to see her on-screen. It's even a more noticeable color than the black dress she wears under it! I'm going along with your joke, just to be clear.
Exactly! What I liked about the 90s live-action remake were (1) Hugh Laurie and Mark Williams as the henchmen and (2) Glenn Close as an unashamedly pantomime villainess. Kids sometimes want to watch an uncomplicated pantomime villain(ess) and idiotic pantomime henchmen.
@@DonVigaDeFierro boohoo is ppl asking for equality too much for your lil brain to handle ? gotta exaggerate it wherever u can because it’s “unfair” to u?
@@Waaagh40KRed Disney: I got friends on the Twitter side. They'll be offended by you. They'll look deep into your heart and soul and make your worst nightmares come true. It's diversity, diversity diversity they need. When they look into the future it's diversity they see. And if you're not satisfied don't blame me. You can blame my friends on the Twitter side.
Read or watch some videos about what they did to Gina Carano .... it sounds like a clic (spelling) of bully girls picking on a girl they have all decided to hate, at a really creepy All Girls school. After Overlord's video this morning, I'd not give Disney a penny more. I don't care if it effects them or not, My own conscience will not permit me to be involved with such odious and mean-spirited people, even from a distance. I hope Disney goes bankrupt. It is probably impossible, but I would rejoice to see them harvest what they have sown. Cinderella, they aren't. They are definitely the evil step mom and her ugly daughters.
The Mandalorian was the last Star Wars Movie or t.v. thing that I was a little interested in and the truth is I thought it would be simple. That Mando would go to a few new planets each week. Sign up for a mission, a rare hunt for an artifact or try to collect on his next bounty and even that was starting to feel a bit crowded with " The hero of the week." So other than that if there are a few good independent graphic novels floating around or the old comics I think I'm just done. I'm good with Marvel's adaptation of Star Wars from the 70s where the heroes go off to different planets on adventures. That's all I originally wanted even out of poor ol' George Lucas but he got a little weird. I didn't need to see Darth Vader as a child. Just pick it up at the Clone Wars, they explain everything on the elevator anyhow and I get the gist of it that Obi One has been training Anakin and later Padme' says " You'll always be that little boy I met on Tatooine." Good enough clunky beginning for me.
- Her name is literally a combination of the words "Cruel" and "Evil/Devil" - Wanted to collect/murder innocent puppies to make new fur coats/handbags - Kidnapped 101 puppies There's no possible way you make a character like that a "misunderstood tragic anti-hero." There's nothing to misunderstand about her; she's pure evil with 0 redeeming qualities. She was written and designed so that children upon looking at her knew she was bad.
Personally, I blame all of this “poor, misunderstood storybook villain” stuff on Wicked. The book made money, and then the play made a lot of money, and then everybody in Hollywood wanted a piece of the action. Disney just happened to already have a giant steaming pile of IP they could use as grist for the mill.
That makes a lot of sense expect for the part that Wicked came out like 20 years ago. Not saying you’re wrong, I’m saying Disney is so behind in the race they actually think they’re ahead 🤦🏽♂️
@@Mr_Bones. it's the generation who grew up idolizing Wicked as progressive that are now in charge of media, of course they're going to apply that sort of fanfic tragic villain rewrite nonsense to Disney staples once they get into power.
Either this means that all the Drinkers reviews are "X is as stunning as it is brave" Or all film makers insert an "X character that is stunning and brave" After years of this shit my brain has been smoothed, and has found more purpose by becoming scrambled eggs.
And the "tragic" death of one "brave hero" who inspired this "peaceful" protest definitelly wasn't the result of a drug abusing criminal with health issues resisting arrest. No, sir!
Well, if thousands of people show up and are being peaceful, but a couple dozen cause property damage-it was a mostly peaceful protest. Is nuance too much for you? Everything gotta be boiled down to be understood?
Don't you just love it when companies get woke? "Yeah let's portray a lady who's main goal is to skin puppies for fashion, as a heroine and feminist icon". Really Disney?
The only disney villain who deserves a movie to be redeemed as a hero is Hades. Unlike Zeus, he's dedicated to his job and prefers to avoid any kind of drama, he helps those in need that come to his kingdom, and wether he had an affair or not, he genuinely cares for his marriage. He's overall the most fair god in the actual greek pantheon.
My thoughts exactly as I was watching this. By all accounts, Hades one of the most morally good deities in the Greek pantheon, making his villain characterization in *Hercules* utter 🐄 💩. His releasing of the Titans to overthrow Olympus in the movie deserves a special mention, because Hades’ position in the underworld made him the de-facto warden of the Titans’ prison; he could’ve released them to take out Olympus any time he wanted, but he didn’t, and that alone adds an extra layer of 🐄 💩 to his portrayal in the movie.
@@markcobuzzi826 Lmao. IIRC, Hades and Persephone are the only sane couple in all of the Greek pantheon. No incest. No rape. No crazy magical shit... Just a married couple...
@@DonVigaDeFierro Albeit a married couple that started from a sudden kidnapping and later negotiations, based on the consumption of magical underworld pomegranate seeds. Still, I did technically say that Hades was a much "nicer" god, as in being the one relatively sane person.
I swear to god, if the Twitter mob is unironically gonna go YAS QUEEN for a sociopath who wanted to skin puppies alive for her wardrobe, I’m gonna eat an actual fridge.
This reminds me of when back in the day, my kinda fucked up English teacher wanted us to write a story on a villain character, except in the genre of mentally deranged, cannibalistic, homicidal, or some sorta other dark area. It definitely wasn't my sorta writing area but I gave it a shot. Later, the teacher wanted us to give a backstory to their horrific identity, be able to see where they were coming from, almost sympathise for them... but considering I chose to do a cannibal... it wasn't great. It was an absolutely disgusting story that I would never want to do anything like again. It kinda reminded me of this because Disney is trying to make the audience feel sympathy for a character who was intended to be despised and showed the upmost disgust towards. Disney has really gotten a lot worse in the past decade.
Just go the Jeffery Dahmer route according to Bill Burr for sympathetic cannibal backstory. " Somebody shoved a tuna sandwich up my ass, and now I mistake people for food!😥"
At least with cannibalism, you could argue that it started as a necessity that grew into more as the character lost their humanity to their cannibalism. You have something there, rather than character who wants to skin puppies
@@lordhellstrande7188 Yeah I think I ended up going down that route, think I had a plane crash, stuck on a desolate island, two survived, one rescued, but then got a taste for it and continued it or something. Even then there's little sympathy you can have for a character like that, but yeah you're right, Cruella is probably even less sympathy cuz she doesn't even do it as a necessity, she just wants a fur coat for a laugh.
*What Disney thinks we want:* showing us a dog-murdering megalomaniac is actually the victim of the story *What we want:* John Wick finds out it's Cruella who killed his dog
@Christopher Heskett Did you not see his video? Yes, we would appreciated nuanced villains. But don't joke yourself, this movie is a cash grab, AND you're telling that side of the story after the time it should've been told (within the original story). I LOVED the original movie, but why not make something new with those qualities?
@Christopher Heskett We bitch about feminism because it is a perspective that has been beaten into us since we were small children. It is old, worn out, annoying as hell and we are tired of looking at it. It is time to move on to something fresh and new, and less toxic.
@Drip Shameless A John Wick vs Cruella de Vil movie would be awesome. Cruella is out of prison and is determined to have her puppy skin coat. One of the dogs she kiddnapps belongs to John Wick. Now John must battle Cruella and her army of henchmen to save not only his dog but 98 other puppies. I don't just want to see this movie, I want to make this movie.
I saw this movie and the whole time in my head "This woman is going to kill puppies!". I thought it was good, decently written and very well acted. I like the one car chase. But when it was over, I didn't know how I was meant to feel let alone how I felt. To further complicate matters they tried to tie it in to the 101 Dalmatians storyline. I think they made it seem like Pongo and Purdy were gifts from Cruella which made NO F***ING SENSE whatsoever. And they made the decision to change Roger and Anita's racial profile. The made Roger a scumbag lawyer who get's fired by Baroness Von Mayonnaise. I didn't even know it was the same Roger until they showed him writing the Cruella DeVil song at the end. Which made NO f***ing sense because it was right after she gifted him Pongo. Imagine if when John Wick after receiving a puppy in the mail writes a song about how much his dead wife was a b*tch. That would have been an entirely different vibe for that movie.
@@TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG They didn't. They tried to just gloss over thee fact that in a few years this woman was going to kidnap and mrder dogs. They just expect us to forget what Cruella stands for as a villain. She's going to slaughter people's dogs to make coats. We know this. Unless this is an entirely alternate time line. That is never clear.
Usually, when writers try to make the villain sympathetic, they go for the sad backstory kind of deal to, if not make us sympathise with the villain, at least understand them. There isn't really a justification for vanity at the cost of killing puppies. Not one which isn't just incredibly forced. "At 1 day old my whole family was killed by dogs, then at 2 days, a dog shat in my face, etc etc".
Me: probably oppressed by 'the evil patriarchy' coz discrimination based on sex like women's quota's wasn't a thing for the past....I don't know 4 decades? Now she's free of the oppressive privileged white man and it's time to be a woman and 'hear her Roar!" but all the rest of the world hears is "I'm a woman, hear me REE!".... on twitter.... from my iPhone or Macbook and an overly priced Starbucks coffee.... complaining about capitalism....
Nobody thought about the actual character. Some director or VP somewhere said "looks like 'chick villains with multicolor hair' movies are trending. Do we have one? Write a story around her!"
Disney: We realized that we identify with the villains more than the heroes, and would like it if people thought they weren't just cool, but actually the good guys all along and that all the old heroes they fought against were actually just mean and narrow-minded and stupid. Me: *vomit noises*
I second that as well, but you won't get evil from Disney. You especially won't get an evil woman from Disney. Got to remember that Disney doesn't believe evil exists. Personally I think they should go look in a mirror.
Nah that guy was probably a white male who owned a gun, so they probably actually see him as a genuine devil. That's kind of the opposite direction they are trying to go here.
This movie began development in 2013, at the time they were trying to set up a scenario where Cruella Deville could run for president so they were trying to make her more likeable. Trouble is she got the nomination too early and ran in 2016 before the movie was ready.
Well the equivalent is RUclips monetizing and protecting animal abusers on this platform. So yeah. I can see Disney protecting their fellow sociopaths.
Disney once built up childhoods and now they're hell-bent on destroying children's childhood AND the "Disney of old" cherished memories in every adult. I wish they would seriously stop. I know money is lovely but they'd make even more if they stopped being so preachy and demonizing everyone and focused on entertainment everyone can love.
The only Disney antagonist that I cant think of who could realistically be remade as a tragic antihero would be Gaston from Beauty and the Beast, but Disney would never do that as he is a textbook example of classical masculinity. Edit: Hades would work well as well, given he’s the only God in Greek mythology who wasn’t a terrible rapist POS.
I was just thinking that! He could have been raised in a household that conditioned him to think showing emotions or crying is weak. You could give him a billy Hargrove type backstory (stranger things) once he started getting recognition for being big and tough it would solidify all he’d been taught. After a while it would totally develop into self destructive narcissism and a need to be the best or ideal. (It’s actually shown how insecure he gets when he realizes belle loves the beast. It’s a person who didn’t praise him for his body and wits and he lashes out because it’s someone he sees as being better then him.) (Also hades really got the short end of the stick being older then Zeus and maybe Poseidon yet getting stuck with the underworld.)
About the narcissistic Gaston... yeah, he couldn't ever be redeemed because he's masculine, unless his masculinity was to be somehow reduced to a bumbling immature fool or an obedient lapdog under the pink leash of some "empowered" princess.
Mouseshwitz is not a family friendly or remotely positive company I am elated everyone is seeing it so clearly 😀 since I first saw Fox and the Hound at the theater I have not been a fan followed up with Bambi yikes.
If you want to watch a Disney movie with actually strong women, go watch Atlantis the Lost Empire. Literally every female character is great in her own right and the movie is just awesome.
Yeah back then when people wrote stories that happen to have strong female leads in it...not like nowadays where they write stories that only focus is havin a female lead
If you want a Disney movie with strong women... just watch the ANIMATED ones! Really, pick one! Even Cinderella kept her positive mindset in a life of mental abuse and tried to escape when her stepmother locked her up in a room. And that was made in the '50, damn it. The modern disney women all seem fake. There's no journey, no emotion. The live action reboots are not even worth watching at this point.
@@enry2337 well, i dont watch a lot of disney, firstly because im not the target audience and secondly because i find the company and what it represents horrible, outside of specific movies
@@sztallone415 The fact that you're not the target of disney entertainment doesn't mean much, trust me. Their animated movies are mostly wonderful, at least before the cgi transition, and adults can easily find things to like in them (the imagination, artistry, subtext, and so on). I guess you already know that, since you recommended the underrated Atlantis. Modern disney on the other hand... yeah, I don't support them. But really, it all comes down to how disney degenerated, becoming a multinational monster who feeds out of our nostalgia to sell forgettable and questionable interpretation of their good entertainment.
Cruella in this movie: "skins and kills" puppies but not really, it's just to anger the Baroness Cruella in any other media: You know what Dio did to Danny? I'll do the same thing.
"Like going back to ta test paper after the exam is already over, and adding completely new answers to questions that were never asked in the first place" - brilliant!
A coat out of PUPPIES And they'll try to make her sympathetic ?!? I can see the animals rights activists marching on the streets with signs that say #BOYCOTTCRUELLA... What's next ,Mother Gothel was a good mother to Rapunzel ...? Ursula as a fair leader ? The evil queen from Snow White with confidence issues ? The misunderstood Queen of Hearts from Alice in wonderland...? oh wait ...
I cant wait to see what heights they lift this woman up to cause just remember, no matter how smart and cunning they make this character out to be, she was outsmarted by a bunch of dogs.
They went so deep into THE MESSAGE that they thought even a woman who wants to skin puppies into a coat deserves to be shown to not be that bad after all. Everything that women do is justified, didn't you know.
Don't like how we can't have villains just be evil people anymore like she literally wanted to kill puppies to make clothes and you basically explain it
It's truly ashame because when I first saw this trailer I thought it was going to be about Estella being in insane obsessed fashion designer who is obsessed with the Baroness until the Baroness's cruel nature breaks Estella with a need to be the best, she finally mentally snaps dyes her hair black and white and embraces Cruella. Captures Baroness's dalmatians and skins them, wearing them. The way she talks about herself could imply her self arrogance and insanity of thinking she is the best and only the best. Baroness tries to comeback by trying to destroy Cruella. Cruella burns Baroness and her mansion to the ground. The police find her with ash all over her. She gives her speech "I'm Cruella" and the police take her in, Horace and Jasper break her out and they escape to Hell Hall. Cruella plotting her next "project" aka 101 Dalmatians. Okay I know my idea is not great or anything but still. I would've loved to see a dark Cruella movie, especially from the trailers not the watered down redemption story which sucks for any villain story.
It will be over when they'll stop making money with them. But don't worry, even if they keep profiting, remember: time is inescapable. Years will pass, until one day those live action reboots are considered in the same way we consider blackface today: pointless, stupid and embarrassing.
@@reptosaurus6638 "I'm sure the Chinese market is cool with killing and skinning 101 Dalmations. So why should we care about different cultures?" Said a Disney Exec.
@@carbootstudios2459 Yep, Dalmatians dropped kick her adoptive mother and she died. But it doesn’t matter because Cruella doesn’t skin puppies in the end, she gives the puppies to River and Anita who haven’t meet yet. It’s just boring.
"What pisses me off about modern Disney?" You can add justify animal abuse. Cause a woman who wants to skin puppies to make a coat out of them is redeemable in anyway and has a tragic backstory that makes you sympathize with her. F**k off film.
To all people planing on spending whatever money on a Disney + subscription I encouraged them to get a dog instead. They'll bring you more happiness and teachings that the shitty Disney remakes.
@@luismarioguerrerosanchez4747 I second that. Better yet, consider rescue, save one of these poor creatures from the abuse and neglect that we are supposed to ignore watching this movie
But those were utter failures from the beginning. Wanda Maximoff and Black Widow are very popular cause they were written better. And are powerful without necessarily starting to feel cringy and boring 2 dimensional characters
Female hero: "Who am I? Oh, wait, I know who I am - I am awesome." Female villain: "I am not evil - just tragically misunderstood. Feel bad for me, as I do evil things." Female audience members: 🙄 🥱 😴
@@atomicdancer true, but those mentioned above are the worst examples. Captain marvel is one of the most hated marvel characters. There are popular female heroes that work out perfectly. And it's many of them. But those that try to be forced are bad: e.g. Captain Marvel, or the female assembly in Endgame. On the other hand, more subtle powerful female characters and scenes are popular: e.g. Infinity war scene with Wanda, Nat and Okoye, or generally characters like those I just mentioned and many more
@@freebrandyornot I’ll defend Captain Marvel to a degree. She was always an asshole, he source material is that she’s a cocky pilot. I never liked her, in any comic or animation. So maybe it was her original writers who fucked her up in the first place
@@kosiqueensly4506 But usually, if you have a cocky character, they have some human flaws that are used to balance it out. Or the other surrounding characters take constant digs and jabs at the character's cockiness. The Flash, in particular, is a great example of this. A cocky young guy who can move really fast. Smart dude to boot. But to balance it out, you have his anxiety and lack of confidence (at certain times), along with most other super characters making him the butt of the joke. So he becomes likable. Cap Marvel... has none of that.
I'm calling it now. Ursula from the little mermaid is going to be the portrayal of " fat shaming " . Shell be about men not finding her attractive, father figure was abusive..... you get where this is going.
Oh they're for sure gonna make Ursula into some kinda tragic villain or some kinda crap. I have no problem with tragic villains, but from Disney? Yeah no. And as often as they've tried it's just another trope Disney has done to death.
Life deals you a shitty hand in life. But it's what you do in spite of that hand that determines who you are. Look up people like David Goggins, an obese, timid black man with an abusive father who became a Navy Seal because he looked up to Rocky. There's a reason stories like David Goggins resonate through history and not stories like Ted Bundy. People like stories of others overcoming the odds. Tragic downfalls are not people to aspire to, regardless of how sympathetic you make them. They're usually a warning and something to avoid.
On a real note though I could definitely see a live action Treasure Planet having some real potential... as long as Disney doesn't have anything to do with it.
Why are they trying to redeem Cruella? She's literally trying to skin puppies, I'm not sympathising with that! Edit: To everyone in the comments wondering about the redemption arc, according to me, from the looks of the trailer, they're setting Cruella up to be a not like other girls designer who had to suffer because she was "unique" and "different" (in the movie's words, "a little mad".) Now, framing Cruella as some misunderstood anti-hero is terrible because she's a VILLAIN. She wants to skin dogs because she wants to, not because the cruel world forced her to! And that's what makes her infinitely creepier and more evil, not whatever the trailer is portraying it to be. She cannot be turned into some woman others should look up to, or someone who is redeemable because she is evil. It was more powerful not knowing why she wanted to skin dogs because it makes you realise how truly scary some people may be. No one who I know is wondering "why does Cruella want to skin all those dogs" and expecting this Rise To Evil Because Society Sucks™ narrative. If I wanted to watch society corrupt a villain I'd just watch Joker instead because the Joker is still a bad guy, just in a different light. Not to mention, a popular comic book villain with multiple storylines is very different to a Disney villain. Disney has potential to provide a brilliant Cruella backstory, which could still show her to be a terrible person and get the point across, but to show her as a "lesser evil" would be rather disappointing. I could be wrong but that's my take on this.
Cruella literally ordered for a tiger to be skinned just so she could have a fur coat, and wants to skin puppies for another, and I'm supposed to sympathize with her. Wtf?
This movie doesn’t make you sympathize with her, and this Cruella seems to be from a complete separate storyline to the 101 Dalmatians so there’s no puppy murdering-in fact, she even has a stray dog friend.
The moment she said " i am woman here me roar," I just knew this going to be a major box-office flop. Disney keeps digging there grave deeper and deeper
@@my_name_is_desh727 I am really getting to the assumption that someone in the higher ranks wants Disney to dismantle itself, because I can't believe that they don't see that this forumla is a straight ticket to damnation for them.
Disney: Hey guys! Remember Cruella? The old lady who wanted to make a coat out of puppies? Yeah so we've decided to make a live action to explain why she's misunderstood and ultimately change her origin story
She is a strong independent woman who don't need no man. Unless it's a henchman. Who she orders around. Because you know, women need their rolemodels too.
“First, there was the animated movie back in the 1960’s, then a live-action remake in the 90’s and a sh*tty sequel in the year 2000.” And TWO animated series: “101 Dalmatians: The Series” in the 90’s and “101 Dalmatian Street”, which premiered a couple years ago. So…yeah. Disney is obsessed with this story for some reason.
I honestly haven't been not pissed off with anything Disney does for at least 2 years now. It is nothing but greed, hypocrisy, spite and stupidity nowadays.
It has nothing to do with puppies...until the sequel. Even from the trailer I can easily tell the dalmatians are nothing more just fan service. *Hint:* She's not "old" enough
I miss the days when villains were villains and didn't need a SOB story for their motivation. Sure it adds "depth" and "layers" to their character...but I don't need to feel bad for a warlord who just genocided half the kingdom because he was bullied as a kid and his dad walked out on him.
to answer your question why, it's because a lot of the biggest companies are so greedy that they'll do the lowest amount of effort that they can get away with, so basically if they gain a net profit they have no incentive to do any better
It's fine though if they side with China against Hong Kong protesters. Or if the strong woman in the movie is literally the most evil person a child could come up with. "She's SO EVIL, she would... kill a puppy! No, ten puppies! 100 puppies!"
Cruella is just misunderstood. If only everyone had given her coats--each one made with the skins of 99 puppies--a chance, her genius would have been appreciated!
@@paulraines9635 Yeah, they were smart enough to disguise themselves with soot and cover their tracks in the snow. I'd rather see a movie about the super smart dogs.
She should look into work under some Old Timey Good Directors or in World Cinema rather than trying to get work from Hollywood. Disney has shown time and time again that they have some ridiculous power behind the scenes in Hollywood and they are not above petty politics.
3:12 - 1974 - I took the last slide-rule class they gave in my high school. A year later I got a Commodore hand calculator for a Christmas gift. That calculator lasted through two years of professional work after graduation from engineering school.
Развлечения
Want to help support this channel?
Check out my books on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Will-Jordan/e/B00BCO7SA8%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
Subscribe on Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheCriticalDrinker
Subscribe on SubscribeStar: www.subscribestar.com/the-critical-drinker
How many of you guys want to see the drinker review anime every Wednesday and which anime do you want to see the drinker review?
SJW and Politics ruins the things we love in the west. Focus on “diversity”, feminism, anti white, anti male, use feelings as an argument, ignore facts and logic, etc.
Anime and manga is booming everywhere as the Japanese understand logics and facts in business.
So, what's your favorite drink?
It's 1 AM... I was about to go to sleep after studying but nothing beats a good old Critical Drinker Video!!!
Could we get a retrospective on the Pirates of the Caribbean movies. I really feel like they’re criminally underrated movies
“I was born brilliant”
Gets outsmarted by puppies.
All narcissists think they are brilliant.
(Slow motion Lylu laugh)
Bitches be like that. And can I get a second (Lylu laugh) .....
And these weren't super smart dogs either, all they did was cover themselves in soot and climb onto a truck. But she's a woman, so she has to be brilliant.
@@ffordegroupie4931 ... What are you talking about? In the original story the dogs and the cat whose kittens Cruella drowned literally premeditated Cruella's financial ruin. They are not normal dogs. It's a fairy tale. They have humanized intelligence.
"Poison them, drown them, bash them on the head...I don't care how you kill the little beasts, but do it, and do it now!"
Misunderstood antihero material right there.
😂😂😂
The ONLY way to make her a it’s understood antihero is to have a tragic backstory involving dogs. But even then, she would mostly be pure evil.
@@leighbelk769 Her mother was a janitor who got locked in the fire station kennel for a long weekend and when they came back on Tuesday there was just a pack of blood soaked dalmatians gnawing on her bones
Wouldn't bashing them on the head ruin their fur?
@@MrZebub I don't think so, 'bashing' is done with a blunt object such as a club. Bashing on the head would kill them by shattering their skulls and the fur would remain intact. Hunters try not to damage the pelt in anyway (such as shooting arrows into the animal) because it decreases the furs value. So bashing is the most effect way to kill without damaging the pelt
"I am woman, hear me roar" is the cringeworthiest thing I've ever heard. And I imagine a bunch of Disney execs actually thought it was cool.
If you hadn’t watched the film, SPOILERS
The line “I am woman, hear me roar” is an excuse Cruella uses in the film to justify herself beating up little boys at her school who only teased her
She says that and proceeds to roar lol 😬i felt so fucking sick lmao
Last time I heard the words I am woman hear me roar was when christian weston chandler put that in his sonichu comics
It's not even that. It's shoe horned af and its not even original
@@Timothy_-ve2zp I mean she’s a fuckin villain. Sounds like something a villain would say to try and justify her actions. It’s a villain origin story you dummy
"I'm a sadistic psychopath who skins puppies for a living. Hear me roar."
Dogs are overrated and spread many diseases mostly now some crazy sick owners who love dogs so much start to have intercourses with them. Hollywood is obsessed with dogs that’s why they told us from young age to get a dog they are you best friends. Best friends don’t kill children more than snakes and bark at every neighbor they see. Simply it become your best friend if you feed it like any animal they only care about themselves and will like you if you feed them, a simple animal with simple basic needs don’t need clothes or anything like humans need beside food sleeping breeding comfort that’s it. Media is obsessed with dogs and don’t care about natural animals who contribute in the echo system with natural breeding selection, they always showed cats are bad now they found that they can make profit from them as well so they started changing ideas, they want your love for money those who are responsible of the multi billion dollar pet industry
@@desertmoonlee6631 I really don't think the first part about dogs was necessary (I'm more of a cat person but still🗿)
I am upset though that cats are always framed as the bad guys:(
Queen.
@@violetdots LMAO
@@violetdots As a dog and a cat person, I personally think it's funny, just how I think it's funny that the digs are usually the stupid ones and the ones that scare cats when neither is necessarily true either.
Cruella: skins puppies to make fur coats.
Disney: is this a feminist icon?
Unless the puppies wouldn’t die... SOMEHOW!?!
XD
She's a #girlboss cause she make dat money and don't rely on no man
Im sure Disney said "this is a Feminist icon" instead of asking if she was or not
Just here to say, I had to remove my like from this comment so its at 101 again. That is all.
@@Sercil00 A valiant effort.
Coming Soon to Disney: "The guy who shot Bambi's mom had 4 kids to feed and rent due."
As a deer hunter who feeds his family with venison every winter, I’d watch it lol
Plot twist: it was a single mom
@@farmschoolchicks1913 double twist she's black single mum who never got a food because of white supremacist...
@@theadoshiagoings878 Same lmao
@@thaliaviolet5344 Triple plot twist: The gun she used was stolen from the white supremacists that blocked her food stamps.
I miss female characters that had depth and flaws. They are all now just perfect beings that can't do anything wrong.
this one most definitely has flaws if she murders puppies lol.
but yes I know what you mean.
Ah the days of Basic Instinct and Fatal Attraction.
It's just a cavalcade of Mary Sues.
Watch Disney Channel's Descendants. That does a great job of building up female _and_ male characters with depth and flaws who start out as villains but learn to be heroes, but also does not have them begin as too irredeemable for us to root for them anyway. It also finds a rare good way to update classic animated Disney fairytales for modern audiences, by showing us why being good and evil are much more complicated than the way classic Disney films initially depicted it by showing Mal's struggle between both sides of morality.
fr this is what i disliked about the movie. you can literally see her lowkey manipulate and control the other two guys just so she can get her revenge going (kinda selfish) and i thought that the conflict would be unfolded more in depth but it just kinda ended with the dude saying "ok ill do this shit again bc we're friends yay"
Cruella keeps boasting on how brilliant she is to eventually get outsmarted by the puppies she tries to murder.
It's called getting complacent or too big for one's boots. Workplaces are full of people who think they are so smart only to end their careers over something so small.
she didn't kill a fucking puppy in the fucking movie, it's literally a remake  (:
@@pangare655 It’s foreshadowing
@@pangare655 Yet another defender of this movie. Look, if you like it, pop off. But the point of this film is to attempt to redeem an unredeemable character.
@@pangare655 its not a remake its a prequel. she may not kill a single puppy here but she does attempt to kill puppies in the future, foreshadowed by the dalmatians in this movie.
Can't wait for the Scar live action movie where he is ostracized for being gay and must fight for hyena rights.
at least it makes sense with his story. Cruella's doesn't make any sense with the original at all.
The Lion King is ironically based! when Strong Patriarchal (Republican) men rule there is plenty...When weak 'inclusive ' (Democrats) rule, jobs dissappear and are given to foreign interests
Nah they already ruined Lion King, they'll go after Hades next. At least that one could be interesting.
Scar is based off Claudius, but he was a villain. However he was a lot less evil than Scar, so I could see a POV where he starts off anti-heroic and is driven to evil instead of being completely evil.
Don´t give them ideas.
"You Either Die A Hero, Or You Wait Long Enough To See Yourself Rebooted to Become The Hero"
Or An Hero
Thanks Harvey👍
Underrated comment.
I didn't laugh out loud, but this is such a clever play on the quote that I just can't help but respect your wit. A quality RUclips comment, who wouldya thought.
@@waccle8335 I can't take full credit cuz The Drinker's wit inspires the best in all of us
I really dont think anyone really asked for a cruella backstory
Yeah she’s a simple character to get you don’t need a whole movie to explain why she acts when it was in the original, also really Disney making the women who wants to skin puppies for her own gain? You want to make that sympathetic? No wounded Disney because your the same!
(Sorry for the rant)
this movie sucked so bad .
i couldn’t keep watching even for the fashion
. i remember when even the low budget disney films were awesome
I assumed the director had some sort of hideous blackmail over somebody on Disney's executive team.
No asked for Casablanca either. Soo I dunno.
No one asked for a crazed Cruella remake, either.
I disagree that Disney are trying to recapture the magic of their glory days. They're not trying at all. They're just putting out half hearted remakes and prequels where all the money goes into politically correct recasting and soulless special effects.
I agree, it doesnt seem making a good movie who also creates lot of money is no longer the first priority, political propaganda bs is!
Preach it bro
Soulless special effects do indeed consume a lot of money. Politically correct recasting might actually be cheaper than the alternative, for one usually casts a bunch of newcomers for that.
There’s actually a disdain toward their legacy. That’s why we see them deconstructed, because it’s “fixing” the problems. Lion King treated like a documentary. Beauty and the Beast fixed Belle by giving her inventing prowess, having her intend to escape her life debt exchange, a town who didn’t actually like Gaston they were just paid, a diverse poor provincial town in an era with slavery, making LeFou “gay”… Maleficent men bad, mother figure love breaking a traditional curse requiring “true love’s kiss” regurgitation of Frozen’s nonsense.
They hate their legacy. They hate their fans. But they want money, and people are too dumb to stop watching these trash movies which have mostly made a billion each. They see it to wax nostalgia about the original, so all these turds make money off the original. That’s why Dumbo flopped. Nobody wanted a Dumbo movie, because nobody ever even talks about it outside reeing over the crows being racist.
@@elvickRULES The thing is when you are trying to be "right" all the time then it loses it's magic. The bits that should be reasonable seem unreasonable and the bits that should be unreasonable are made too logical that they ruin the magic. Movies are products of their time so they don't necessarily need to be "fixed" because no one is going to make a move with those values today.
"I am woman, hear me roar"
They aren't even trying anymore.
Hahahaha XD
when did they try ?
@Simple Weirdo I'm glad I'm not the only one who was reminded of sonichu when I heard that line 🤣
Lmao
@Simple Weirdo HAHA CHINA LMAO
Disney in the US: Black Lives Matter
Disney in China: Not that much
DiFfErEnT sOcIaL nOrMs
In China, it is the state that rules everything. They ensure they do brilliantly at trade, they ensure corporatist oligarchs don't gain too much power (like breaking up Jack Ma's business when he took it upon himself to criticise state economical policy - f u, you're a business owner, not the country's leader, stfu) and are establishing a system where people are getting richer while the state doesn't dissipate. The opposite of the west, where there is increasingly smaller tax revenue to the point where health services can't manage nastier respitory infections, unelected oligarchs dictate state policy and are in charge of all major political parties, making all elections a sham at best.
China does do nasty stuff, only to be expected from a place where state is top dog, but at least they're not pu***fying men and turning them into pathetic latte-drinking corposlaves. I'm starting to gain more respect for them than for the west, which at this point, is in its final groans of degeneracy
No lives matter in China
C'mon man, it's just part of their culture to be racists yellow supremacists that have ethnic cleansing camps, and we should respect them for it, not hold them accountable for their actions.
@@piano_master_5246 Okay Biden
My reaction to this movie's existence was one single word:
Why?
Cruella DeVil is not just a one-dimensional villain, she is the quintessential one-dimensional villain. She was written to be one-dimensional specifically because 101 Dalmatians is a story that is told from the dogs' point of view. She has literally the same role as a stereotypical cartoon dog catcher except better, specifically because she is definitively evil (holy crap, that lousy 90s live action remake at least got that part right).
The movie's existence is also proof that nobody at Disney actually believes in feminism, and is just using it as a cheap marketing ploy. Because nobody who actually does believe that "I am woman, hear me roar" is such a bestest ever slogan would want to tell you that the woman chanting it turns out to be a puppy murderer.
This movie has no reason to exist, its underlying concept is so extraordinarily terrible that the actual presentation of the film is irrelevant. But the presentation of the film is probably awful too, considering Disney's live action remake track record.
I was about to go into my usual rant about how, if a character were truly one-dimensional, you wouldn't be able to see them. Bad characters are two-dimensional, good characters are three-dimensional. But Cruella is so skinny, you're just about right.
Considering the feminist movement kicked off with "Let's blow up buildings and kill people to get privileges we haven't earned and won't take the same responsibility as the men," I'd say that at least is in keeping.
@@viddork That's probably why they gave her that insanely huge fur coat, easier to see her on-screen. It's even a more noticeable color than the black dress she wears under it! I'm going along with your joke, just to be clear.
Exactly! What I liked about the 90s live-action remake were (1) Hugh Laurie and Mark Williams as the henchmen and (2) Glenn Close as an unashamedly pantomime villainess. Kids sometimes want to watch an uncomplicated pantomime villain(ess) and idiotic pantomime henchmen.
101 Dalmations: Cruella DeVille tortures, kills, eats and wears puppies.
Cruella DeVille: Here's my side of the story.....
She eats them?
I don't remember the eating part
Wait, what?, she eats them?, since when.
@@TheMightyCrucibleKnight184 SInce puppies were invented.
@@hoibsh21 fair point.
Nothing says 'female empowerment' like skinning dogs for self-vanity and exclaiming "I was born brilliant".
The coats won't be perfect until they "fit a woman"-
The dogs were male tho, it's okay becuz of that.
@@christopherc5456 dang 90-something dogs and they were all male that's impressive
But it's OK because she's a woman.
@@DonVigaDeFierro boohoo is ppl asking for equality too much for your lil brain to handle ? gotta exaggerate it wherever u can because it’s “unfair” to u?
Disney ironically turned their own company into a generic Disney villain.
@@Waaagh40KRed Disney: I got friends on the Twitter side. They'll be offended by you. They'll look deep into your heart and soul and make your worst nightmares come true. It's diversity, diversity diversity they need. When they look into the future it's diversity they see. And if you're not satisfied don't blame me. You can blame my friends on the Twitter side.
Read or watch some videos about what they did to Gina Carano .... it sounds like a clic (spelling) of bully girls picking on a girl they have all decided to hate, at a really creepy All Girls school. After Overlord's video this morning, I'd not give Disney a penny more. I don't care if it effects them or not, My own conscience will not permit me to be involved with such odious and mean-spirited people, even from a distance. I hope Disney goes bankrupt. It is probably impossible, but I would rejoice to see them harvest what they have sown. Cinderella, they aren't. They are definitely the evil step mom and her ugly daughters.
@@kathleenhensley5951 Disney are the "mean girl" characters from teen comedies in company form.
The Mandalorian was the last Star Wars Movie or t.v. thing that I was a little interested in and the truth is I thought it would be simple. That Mando would go to a few new planets each week. Sign up for a mission, a rare hunt for an artifact or try to collect on his next bounty and even that was starting to feel a bit crowded with " The hero of the week." So other than that if there are a few good independent graphic novels floating around or the old comics I think I'm just done. I'm good with Marvel's adaptation of Star Wars from the 70s where the heroes go off to different planets on adventures. That's all I originally wanted even out of poor ol' George Lucas but he got a little weird. I didn't need to see Darth Vader as a child. Just pick it up at the Clone Wars, they explain everything on the elevator anyhow and I get the gist of it that Obi One has been training Anakin and later Padme' says " You'll always be that little boy I met on Tatooine." Good enough clunky beginning for me.
I use to think what happen tonDisney was a tragedy. BUT NOW I REALIZE, IT'S A COMEDY.
- Her name is literally a combination of the words "Cruel" and "Evil/Devil"
- Wanted to collect/murder innocent puppies to make new fur coats/handbags
- Kidnapped 101 puppies
There's no possible way you make a character like that a "misunderstood tragic anti-hero." There's nothing to misunderstand about her; she's pure evil with 0 redeeming qualities. She was written and designed so that children upon looking at her knew she was bad.
Personally, I blame all of this “poor, misunderstood storybook villain” stuff on Wicked. The book made money, and then the play made a lot of money, and then everybody in Hollywood wanted a piece of the action. Disney just happened to already have a giant steaming pile of IP they could use as grist for the mill.
That makes a lot of sense expect for the part that Wicked came out like 20 years ago. Not saying you’re wrong, I’m saying Disney is so behind in the race they actually think they’re ahead 🤦🏽♂️
@@Mr_Bones. and even they were pretty late
isn’t that sam raimi OZ, a version of wicked combined with a origin story for the wizzard
@@Mr_Bones. it's the generation who grew up idolizing Wicked as progressive that are now in charge of media, of course they're going to apply that sort of fanfic tragic villain rewrite nonsense to Disney staples once they get into power.
Wicked is nothing but crappy fanfiction to begin with. The only thing good about it is Idina Mendez's performance.
I can see the critic's reviews already: "Cruella is as stunning as it is brave."
I can see this: FANS ARE BIGOTS, SEXIST AND RACIST TROLLS, as the only reason the movie isn't liked.
Yet gets taken down by dogs easily
Yeah you gotta be pretty brave to be willing to act in a role as a white person these days.
Meanwhile being more generic than a loaf of bread in the current trend.
Either this means that all the Drinkers reviews are "X is as stunning as it is brave"
Or all film makers insert an "X character that is stunning and brave"
After years of this shit my brain has been smoothed, and has found more purpose by becoming scrambled eggs.
“Oh look, she’s destroying a building with reckless abandon.”
It was a mostly peaceful protest.
It was a fiery but peaceful protest
oh snap
And the "tragic" death of one "brave hero" who inspired this "peaceful" protest definitelly wasn't the result of a drug abusing criminal with health issues resisting arrest. No, sir!
LMAO! Spot on mate
Well, if thousands of people show up and are being peaceful, but a couple dozen cause property damage-it was a mostly peaceful protest. Is nuance too much for you? Everything gotta be boiled down to be understood?
“ Dalmatians killed my mom” is the single dumbest villain motivation I have ever seen or heard of.
even worse than "music killed my grandma"
Don't you just love it when companies get woke? "Yeah let's portray a lady who's main goal is to skin puppies for fashion, as a heroine and feminist icon".
Really Disney?
The only disney villain who deserves a movie to be redeemed as a hero is Hades. Unlike Zeus, he's dedicated to his job and prefers to avoid any kind of drama, he helps those in need that come to his kingdom, and wether he had an affair or not, he genuinely cares for his marriage. He's overall the most fair god in the actual greek pantheon.
Not to mention, in the actual Greek myths, Hades is ironically one of the much nicer gods.
My thoughts exactly as I was watching this. By all accounts, Hades one of the most morally good deities in the Greek pantheon, making his villain characterization in *Hercules* utter 🐄 💩. His releasing of the Titans to overthrow Olympus in the movie deserves a special mention, because Hades’ position in the underworld made him the de-facto warden of the Titans’ prison; he could’ve released them to take out Olympus any time he wanted, but he didn’t, and that alone adds an extra layer of 🐄 💩 to his portrayal in the movie.
@Lujack Shaw Yeah, there's already a pretty famous musical about him and it makes so much sense
@@markcobuzzi826 Lmao. IIRC, Hades and Persephone are the only sane couple in all of the Greek pantheon. No incest. No rape. No crazy magical shit... Just a married couple...
@@DonVigaDeFierro
Albeit a married couple that started from a sudden kidnapping and later negotiations, based on the consumption of magical underworld pomegranate seeds. Still, I did technically say that Hades was a much "nicer" god, as in being the one relatively sane person.
I swear to god, if the Twitter mob is unironically gonna go YAS QUEEN for a sociopath who wanted to skin puppies alive for her wardrobe, I’m gonna eat an actual fridge.
it will
want some ketchup with your fridge?
I can give you a thing for unlimited breadsticks as well.
Dear Lord, I hope someone catches that on camera lmao😂😂😂😂
i mean idk maybe the movie will switch her up like it did maleficent. but from the dogs growling at her it looks like they ain't gonna. so wtf
This reminds me of when back in the day, my kinda fucked up English teacher wanted us to write a story on a villain character, except in the genre of mentally deranged, cannibalistic, homicidal, or some sorta other dark area.
It definitely wasn't my sorta writing area but I gave it a shot. Later, the teacher wanted us to give a backstory to their horrific identity, be able to see where they were coming from, almost sympathise for them... but considering I chose to do a cannibal... it wasn't great. It was an absolutely disgusting story that I would never want to do anything like again.
It kinda reminded me of this because Disney is trying to make the audience feel sympathy for a character who was intended to be despised and showed the upmost disgust towards.
Disney has really gotten a lot worse in the past decade.
Just go the Jeffery Dahmer route according to Bill Burr for sympathetic cannibal backstory. " Somebody shoved a tuna sandwich up my ass, and now I mistake people for food!😥"
At least with cannibalism, you could argue that it started as a necessity that grew into more as the character lost their humanity to their cannibalism. You have something there, rather than character who wants to skin puppies
@@lordhellstrande7188 Yeah I think I ended up going down that route, think I had a plane crash, stuck on a desolate island, two survived, one rescued, but then got a taste for it and continued it or something.
Even then there's little sympathy you can have for a character like that, but yeah you're right, Cruella is probably even less sympathy cuz she doesn't even do it as a necessity, she just wants a fur coat for a laugh.
@@Raxacoricofallapatorius Have you seen Yellowjackets?
Cruella: "Im a Woman, hear me roar"
Me: [lord Tyrion barfing scene]
“I am woman, hear me roar” bruh the cringe is beyond the moon.
This is on the same level as Ruby Rose’s “When it fits a woman”
Cringed so much all my atoms simultaneously shrank inwards and turned me into a blackhole
Strong independent wAhMen
@@abutterynoodle9347 Dude it's not that bad! 🤣
@@theketaminekid1241 It really is🤣
*What Disney thinks we want:* showing us a dog-murdering megalomaniac is actually the victim of the story
*What we want:* John Wick finds out it's Cruella who killed his dog
No going to jail for Cruella if she met John Wick.
@Christopher Heskett Did you not see his video? Yes, we would appreciated nuanced villains. But don't joke yourself, this movie is a cash grab, AND you're telling that side of the story after the time it should've been told (within the original story). I LOVED the original movie, but why not make something new with those qualities?
And he makes her die 101 deaths 😯
@Christopher Heskett We bitch about feminism because it is a perspective that has been beaten into us since we were small children. It is old, worn out, annoying as hell and we are tired of looking at it. It is time to move on to something fresh and new, and less toxic.
@Drip Shameless A John Wick vs Cruella de Vil movie would be awesome. Cruella is out of prison and is determined to have her puppy skin coat. One of the dogs she kiddnapps belongs to John Wick. Now John must battle Cruella and her army of henchmen to save not only his dog but 98 other puppies.
I don't just want to see this movie, I want to make this movie.
"Yeah, let's sympathize with a literal hellspawn and make her an anti hero" - Disney, once again high on heroine.
I almost scrolled past this and noticed the pun; clever word play! XD
Truth
"Literal hellspawn"? Citation needed.
I saw this movie and the whole time in my head "This woman is going to kill puppies!". I thought it was good, decently written and very well acted. I like the one car chase. But when it was over, I didn't know how I was meant to feel let alone how I felt.
To further complicate matters they tried to tie it in to the 101 Dalmatians storyline. I think they made it seem like Pongo and Purdy were gifts from Cruella which made NO F***ING SENSE whatsoever. And they made the decision to change Roger and Anita's racial profile. The made Roger a scumbag lawyer who get's fired by Baroness Von Mayonnaise. I didn't even know it was the same Roger until they showed him writing the Cruella DeVil song at the end. Which made NO f***ing sense because it was right after she gifted him Pongo.
Imagine if when John Wick after receiving a puppy in the mail writes a song about how much his dead wife was a b*tch. That would have been an entirely different vibe for that movie.
i saw it and didn't think they even went to the klling puppies story line, the puppies were the killers in this one lmfao
@@TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG They didn't. They tried to just gloss over thee fact that in a few years this woman was going to kidnap and mrder dogs. They just expect us to forget what Cruella stands for as a villain. She's going to slaughter people's dogs to make coats. We know this. Unless this is an entirely alternate time line. That is never clear.
Why did they make Roger a lawyer when he was a videogame developer?
@@astrobat1638 Originally he was a song writer in the animated movie. If I remember correctly.
Disney: “she’s misunderstood”
Cruella: *Literally wants to make a coat from puppies*
hello me ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Usually, when writers try to make the villain sympathetic, they go for the sad backstory kind of deal to, if not make us sympathise with the villain, at least understand them. There isn't really a justification for vanity at the cost of killing puppies. Not one which isn't just incredibly forced. "At 1 day old my whole family was killed by dogs, then at 2 days, a dog shat in my face, etc etc".
Disney: Owned by China
Disney: Butchering dogs is fine
I think I'm noticing a pattern...
Disney CEO: YoU JuSt DoN't UnDeRsTaNd... it's FoR FeMaLe EmPoWeRmEnT!
Me: probably oppressed by 'the evil patriarchy' coz discrimination based on sex like women's quota's wasn't a thing for the past....I don't know 4 decades? Now she's free of the oppressive privileged white man and it's time to be a woman and 'hear her Roar!" but all the rest of the world hears is "I'm a woman, hear me REE!".... on twitter.... from my iPhone or Macbook and an overly priced Starbucks coffee.... complaining about capitalism....
"Her name is literally Cruel Devil."
"I think there's potential to make her into an anti-hero perhaps?"
Nobody thought about the actual character. Some director or VP somewhere said "looks like 'chick villains with multicolor hair' movies are trending. Do we have one? Write a story around her!"
@@mallninja9805 To be fair it was done before Suicide Squad it's just getting released afterwards
Maybe the hunter of Bambi's mother will have his own movie, too. That's how greedy Disney is
It makes sense when a proportion of the studio are probably real Satanists/Luciferists.
@@lordbuddybear He was just trying to feed his family.
Disney: We realized that we identify with the villains more than the heroes, and would like it if people thought they weren't just cool, but actually the good guys all along and that all the old heroes they fought against were actually just mean and narrow-minded and stupid.
Me: *vomit noises*
"I am woman, hear me roar".
*proceeds to show all hell breaking loose*
So is Disney trying to tell me that the Woman is an agent of chaos?
Well, they're pushing for selfishness and apathy, so that's what they create.
@@lotgc good point lol
Well that is laughable 😂😂😂 so may be it's a comedy
Literally yes
Sounds legit, in my experience.
Cruella: "I was born brilliant."
Also Cruella: **gets outplayed by dogs**
This made me giggle :)
🙃
XD
Her intelligence must have really gone to the dogs the older she got.
You just copied a comment I can see right below yours here.
The character wanted to make a coat out of PUPPIES. I’m not interested in a misunderstood antihero. I want evil
Antihero can be interessting, when written by competent writer, which we won't have here
I second that, why can't they simply be evil, and not just tragically misunderstood?
It might be just that hopefully
@@trinaq Because 'evil' is just a spectrum, dontcha know! You're just evil-shaming! Everyone is special and deserves a trophy. And their own bathroom.
I second that as well, but you won't get evil from Disney. You especially won't get an evil woman from Disney. Got to remember that Disney doesn't believe evil exists. Personally I think they should go look in a mirror.
Baroness Von Mayonnaise.
I can't stop laughing.
I really hate how Disney are like We'Re EmPoWeRiNg WoMeN while using fucking villains rather than new original heroes
“I am woman hear me roar” she says as she tries to kidnap and skin puppies
It's okay, because the puppies all voted for Trump.
"I am a man. I hear you nagging me to death."
How do they not realize that lines like these are 100% pure distilled cringe
🎵but a greyhound fur tuxedo would be best 🎵
If you think about it, that's a very bad perspective to have about females, especially if it is meant to "empower" them in the first place.
Can't wait for the long in-depth movie about the guy who shot Bambi's mom.
He was actually aiming for a cougar about to pounce.... But missed. Tragic.
@@MUSICLOVER23429 The jerky was stupendous.
Ssh, don’t give them ideas!
I mean, why not?
Nah that guy was probably a white male who owned a gun, so they probably actually see him as a genuine devil. That's kind of the opposite direction they are trying to go here.
I can already hear the "You don't like Cruella, because she's a woman" bullshit lol
This movie began development in 2013, at the time they were trying to set up a scenario where Cruella Deville could run for president so they were trying to make her more likeable. Trouble is she got the nomination too early and ran in 2016 before the movie was ready.
Everyone “At least we can all agree that puppy killers are evil.”
Disney “Puppy killers are also people!”
They are okay with genocide are you really surprised?
Well the equivalent is RUclips monetizing and protecting animal abusers on this platform. So yeah. I can see Disney protecting their fellow sociopaths.
Disney once built up childhoods and now they're hell-bent on destroying children's childhood AND the "Disney of old" cherished memories in every adult. I wish they would seriously stop. I know money is lovely but they'd make even more if they stopped being so preachy and demonizing everyone and focused on entertainment everyone can love.
Puppy Killers Lives Matter
@Mar celo Their response: Nazis aren't people!
oh man how disney has fallen...
Disney has always been evil as fuck
“What’s fall it’s fallen”
-Batman
“oh how the mighty sith have fallen” - Obi-Wan Kenobi
Disney's head is rolling over in it's jar.
Wouldn't be the first time that Disney has been hanging in the ropes.
But I wonder if they can recover from this.
Cruella: I'm a genius
also Cruella: gets outsmarted by puppies (again and again)
The only Disney antagonist that I cant think of who could realistically be remade as a tragic antihero would be Gaston from Beauty and the Beast, but Disney would never do that as he is a textbook example of classical masculinity.
Edit: Hades would work well as well, given he’s the only God in Greek mythology who wasn’t a terrible rapist POS.
I was just thinking that! He could have been raised in a household that conditioned him to think showing emotions or crying is weak. You could give him a billy Hargrove type backstory (stranger things) once he started getting recognition for being big and tough it would solidify all he’d been taught. After a while it would totally develop into self destructive narcissism and a need to be the best or ideal. (It’s actually shown how insecure he gets when he realizes belle loves the beast. It’s a person who didn’t praise him for his body and wits and he lashes out because it’s someone he sees as being better then him.)
(Also hades really got the short end of the stick being older then Zeus and maybe Poseidon yet getting stuck with the underworld.)
About the narcissistic Gaston... yeah, he couldn't ever be redeemed because he's masculine, unless his masculinity was to be somehow reduced to a bumbling immature fool or an obedient lapdog under the pink leash of some "empowered" princess.
This woman is literally buffalo bill but with puppies.
Disney: Let's use her to promote female empowerment.
Imagine believing the inclusive feminist propaganda from one of the biggest corporations owned by some old men.
At least Cruella was planning on having them killed first at least in the animated film. Though that isn't a big difference but still a difference.
Good point, it fits their warped thinking these days.
Mouseshwitz is not a family friendly or remotely positive company I am elated everyone is seeing it so clearly 😀 since I first saw Fox and the Hound at the theater I have not been a fan followed up with Bambi yikes.
@@questaskybreezy1338 lol "Mouseshwitz"
I'm going to use that from now on.
If you want to watch a Disney movie with actually strong women, go watch Atlantis the Lost Empire. Literally every female character is great in her own right and the movie is just awesome.
Yeah back then when people wrote stories that happen to have strong female leads in it...not like nowadays where they write stories that only focus is havin a female lead
Atlantis was a badass movie.
If you want a Disney movie with strong women... just watch the ANIMATED ones! Really, pick one! Even Cinderella kept her positive mindset in a life of mental abuse and tried to escape when her stepmother locked her up in a room. And that was made in the '50, damn it.
The modern disney women all seem fake. There's no journey, no emotion. The live action reboots are not even worth watching at this point.
@@enry2337 well, i dont watch a lot of disney, firstly because im not the target audience and secondly because i find the company and what it represents horrible, outside of specific movies
@@sztallone415 The fact that you're not the target of disney entertainment doesn't mean much, trust me. Their animated movies are mostly wonderful, at least before the cgi transition, and adults can easily find things to like in them (the imagination, artistry, subtext, and so on). I guess you already know that, since you recommended the underrated Atlantis.
Modern disney on the other hand... yeah, I don't support them. But really, it all comes down to how disney degenerated, becoming a multinational monster who feeds out of our nostalgia to sell forgettable and questionable interpretation of their good entertainment.
Cruella in this movie: "skins and kills" puppies but not really, it's just to anger the Baroness
Cruella in any other media: You know what Dio did to Danny? I'll do the same thing.
"Like going back to ta test paper after the exam is already over, and adding completely new answers to questions that were never asked in the first place" - brilliant!
Remember, this is a character who’s sole goal in the original was to make a coat.
Disney have made sequels out of less
A coat out of PUPPIES And they'll try to make her sympathetic ?!? I can see the animals rights activists marching on the streets with signs that say #BOYCOTTCRUELLA... What's next ,Mother Gothel was a good mother to Rapunzel ...? Ursula as a fair leader ? The evil queen from Snow White with confidence issues ? The misunderstood Queen of Hearts from Alice in wonderland...? oh wait ...
@@alexp.d3689 Good old youtube keeps censoring my comment.... this site is run by pathetic, power tripping, censorious, petty dictator wanna-be's.
Not only that, but she was also outsmarted by Two Adult Dogs and their Newborn Puppies and failed to make that Coat.
@@alexp.d3689 STOP BEFORE THEY HEAR YOU.
I cant wait to see what heights they lift this woman up to cause just remember, no matter how smart and cunning they make this character out to be, she was outsmarted by a bunch of dogs.
Can't spell "Dalmatian" without "man"
@@darrengordon-hill hahaha lol
Lowblow man lowblow
@@darrengordon-hill 😂😂😂 right? The Dalmatians were a metaphor about the patriarchy all along and Cruella was not the villain but the victim.
She was outsmarted by cartoon dogs, though. They are much smarter than real dogs.
They went so deep into THE MESSAGE that they thought even a woman who wants to skin puppies into a coat deserves to be shown to not be that bad after all. Everything that women do is justified, didn't you know.
Don't like how we can't have villains just be evil people anymore like she literally wanted to kill puppies to make clothes and you basically explain it
I like that Cruella thinks that everyone hates her because she's a strong independent woman, and not because she literally wants to skin puppies
WHERE DID THIS COME FROM LMAO you misogynists are reaching SO far
@@DANIELGORMANN No woman is polishing your sword, sir white knight.
@@DonVigaDeFierro ohh and you’re a woman are you?
@@DANIELGORMANN 236 comments, wow.
@@user-nf6fd5dm3w yeah, it’s almost as if yall won’t stop responding and tell me i’m ‘ignoring valid points’ if i don’t engage with you
I think Tolkien summed up Disney quite nicely: "I recognise his talent, but it has always seemed to me hopelessly corrupted".
And that's why Tolkien made his family swear they would never sell his creations to Disney.
Who? To Walt Disney or to the Disney as a company?
@@jerry12314 Im assuming both
@@silent6648 I always believed Walt would despise what Disney is today but either way good on Tolkien for having foresight.
33rd degree mason. Disney is satanic. Trafficking kids. Disney cruise had a trip to epstein island. Look it up. Disney club 33. Disney illuminati.
0:04 I respect you for telling the audience about the concentration camps while the world remains silent on this issue
It's truly ashame because when I first saw this trailer I thought it was going to be about Estella being in insane obsessed fashion designer who is obsessed with the Baroness until the Baroness's cruel nature breaks Estella with a need to be the best, she finally mentally snaps dyes her hair black and white and embraces Cruella. Captures Baroness's dalmatians and skins them, wearing them. The way she talks about herself could imply her self arrogance and insanity of thinking she is the best and only the best. Baroness tries to comeback by trying to destroy Cruella. Cruella burns Baroness and her mansion to the ground. The police find her with ash all over her. She gives her speech "I'm Cruella" and the police take her in, Horace and Jasper break her out and they escape to Hell Hall. Cruella plotting her next "project" aka 101 Dalmatians. Okay I know my idea is not great or anything but still. I would've loved to see a dark Cruella movie, especially from the trailers not the watered down redemption story which sucks for any villain story.
I can’t wait until this live action era is over.
Then, we'll have nothing, as Disney has lost their animation skills. But heck, "nothing" would be a vast improvement.
@@Rationalific Nah they'll just continue remaking their remade movies and tv shows.
It'll never end bruh. When they're done with all the remakes enough time will pass where they could do it again.
It will be over when they'll stop making money with them. But don't worry, even if they keep profiting, remember: time is inescapable. Years will pass, until one day those live action reboots are considered in the same way we consider blackface today: pointless, stupid and embarrassing.
@@Rationalific
They are still making original animated films, actually.
"Lets go skin some dogs"
- A positive misunderstood antihero Cruella
yeah wow
Disney's going for the "it's ok in other cultures to skin and eat dogs", so she'll be depicted as a hero.
@@reptosaurus6638 Well since Joe Biden said that genocide is just fine so long as it's part of your culture, maybe that's the mainstream message now.
Hey, Chinese people eat dog
@@reptosaurus6638 "If it's fine with China, it's fine with us!"
@@reptosaurus6638 "I'm sure the Chinese market is cool with killing and skinning 101 Dalmations. So why should we care about different cultures?" Said a Disney Exec.
Oof this prediction aged badly!
Yeah it was hard to tell, assuming Disney is going to pander woke shit is pretty safe bet though
I can imagine the product was a tad worse, or possibly boring.
@@carbootstudios2459 Yep, Dalmatians dropped kick her adoptive mother and she died. But it doesn’t matter because Cruella doesn’t skin puppies in the end, she gives the puppies to River and Anita who haven’t meet yet. It’s just boring.
@@shayla106 I can imagine so.
The Mayonnaise joke had me spitting my protein shake all over my Phone 😂😂
"What pisses me off about modern Disney?"
You can add justify animal abuse.
Cause a woman who wants to skin puppies to make a coat out of them is redeemable in anyway and has a tragic backstory that makes you sympathize with her.
F**k off film.
As someone who has worked with abused dogs in a shelter... Double F*** Off Film!
To all people planing on spending whatever money on a Disney + subscription I encouraged them to get a dog instead. They'll bring you more happiness and teachings that the shitty Disney remakes.
@@luismarioguerrerosanchez4747 I second that. Better yet, consider rescue, save one of these poor creatures from the abuse and neglect that we are supposed to ignore watching this movie
And way before that, there was that time they killed off a whole bunch of lemmings 'for entertainment purposes.' (True story.)
@@Maerahn What!?! Could you elaborate?
“I was born completely brilliant.”
Ah yes, the Captain Rey Skywalker Marvel School of Female Character Writing.
But those were utter failures from the beginning. Wanda Maximoff and Black Widow are very popular cause they were written better. And are powerful without necessarily starting to feel cringy and boring 2 dimensional characters
Female hero: "Who am I? Oh, wait, I know who I am - I am awesome."
Female villain: "I am not evil - just tragically misunderstood. Feel bad for me, as I do evil things."
Female audience members: 🙄 🥱 😴
@@atomicdancer true, but those mentioned above are the worst examples. Captain marvel is one of the most hated marvel characters. There are popular female heroes that work out perfectly. And it's many of them. But those that try to be forced are bad: e.g. Captain Marvel, or the female assembly in Endgame.
On the other hand, more subtle powerful female characters and scenes are popular: e.g. Infinity war scene with Wanda, Nat and Okoye, or generally characters like those I just mentioned and many more
@@freebrandyornot I’ll defend Captain Marvel to a degree. She was always an asshole, he source material is that she’s a cocky pilot. I never liked her, in any comic or animation. So maybe it was her original writers who fucked her up in the first place
@@kosiqueensly4506 But usually, if you have a cocky character, they have some human flaws that are used to balance it out. Or the other surrounding characters take constant digs and jabs at the character's cockiness.
The Flash, in particular, is a great example of this. A cocky young guy who can move really fast. Smart dude to boot. But to balance it out, you have his anxiety and lack of confidence (at certain times), along with most other super characters making him the butt of the joke. So he becomes likable.
Cap Marvel... has none of that.
here after watching the movie and actually liking it.
How could you make it past dem dogs charging into Cruella's mother down the cliff with no reason at all xD
Same
@@nemnymeria7873 i saw emma thompson acting in the movie. here is my reason
@2freeIvX Ah yes, calling someone stupid.
Totally mature.
@@Ayoubwastaken
Only saving grace, if even that
"Baroness Von Mayonnaise".
😂😂😂😂😂
I'm calling it now. Ursula from the little mermaid is going to be the portrayal of " fat shaming " . Shell be about men not finding her attractive, father figure was abusive..... you get where this is going.
Whoa, can already see the pattern reused.
That fake trailer with Ariana Grande as Ariel actually looked a whole lot better.
Oh they're for sure gonna make Ursula into some kinda tragic villain or some kinda crap. I have no problem with tragic villains, but from Disney? Yeah no. And as often as they've tried it's just another trope Disney has done to death.
I said that on another video. They'll say Triton called her fat and that turned her evil.
Life deals you a shitty hand in life. But it's what you do in spite of that hand that determines who you are. Look up people like David Goggins, an obese, timid black man with an abusive father who became a Navy Seal because he looked up to Rocky. There's a reason stories like David Goggins resonate through history and not stories like Ted Bundy. People like stories of others overcoming the odds. Tragic downfalls are not people to aspire to, regardless of how sympathetic you make them. They're usually a warning and something to avoid.
That "I am woman" line was about as subtle as getting hit with a freight train that's carrying anvils.
Which then got into a train wreck, on a boat... in the paraphrased words of old Nostalgia Critic.
ACME
Without brakes
Concluding with the entire train combusting into flames.
Your collage of old Disney movies makes me want to go watch those again.
On a real note though I could definitely see a live action Treasure Planet having some real potential... as long as Disney doesn't have anything to do with it.
Why are they trying to redeem Cruella? She's literally trying to skin puppies, I'm not sympathising with that!
Edit: To everyone in the comments wondering about the redemption arc, according to me, from the looks of the trailer, they're setting Cruella up to be a not like other girls designer who had to suffer because she was "unique" and "different" (in the movie's words, "a little mad".) Now, framing Cruella as some misunderstood anti-hero is terrible because she's a VILLAIN. She wants to skin dogs because she wants to, not because the cruel world forced her to! And that's what makes her infinitely creepier and more evil, not whatever the trailer is portraying it to be. She cannot be turned into some woman others should look up to, or someone who is redeemable because she is evil. It was more powerful not knowing why she wanted to skin dogs because it makes you realise how truly scary some people may be. No one who I know is wondering "why does Cruella want to skin all those dogs" and expecting this Rise To Evil Because Society Sucks™ narrative. If I wanted to watch society corrupt a villain I'd just watch Joker instead because the Joker is still a bad guy, just in a different light. Not to mention, a popular comic book villain with multiple storylines is very different to a Disney villain. Disney has potential to provide a brilliant Cruella backstory, which could still show her to be a terrible person and get the point across, but to show her as a "lesser evil" would be rather disappointing. I could be wrong but that's my take on this.
Even Mr Burns is less evil because he eventually decided he couldn't go through with skinning puppies
@@redjirachi1 true!
THERE ARE NOT
And if they where she’s already been redeemed in other shows
@@countvoncruel3378 We don't talk about that shit!
She's a woman, that's why. I'm sure the explanation will be all the abuse that she had to go through in a man's world.
Woman: >Trying to kill dogs to make a outfit.
Disney: "Now that's a hero for young girls!"
oh yeah, she also smokes too
Cause, fashion, of course.
Cruella: kills puppies and turns them into clothes
Disney: Aww she's just misunderstood
Cruella literally ordered for a tiger to be skinned just so she could have a fur coat, and wants to skin puppies for another, and I'm supposed to sympathize with her. Wtf?
This movie doesn’t make you sympathize with her, and this Cruella seems to be from a complete separate storyline to the 101 Dalmatians so there’s no puppy murdering-in fact, she even has a stray dog friend.
The moment she said " i am woman here me roar," I just knew this going to be a major box-office flop. Disney keeps digging there grave deeper and deeper
Go on then, Woman. Let me hear you Roar.
"squeek"
@@hendrikscheepers4144 his review of batwhaman tells me everything I need to know about that show lol
@@my_name_is_desh727 I am really getting to the assumption that someone in the higher ranks wants Disney to dismantle itself, because I can't believe that they don't see that this forumla is a straight ticket to damnation for them.
Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake
@@riftvallance2087 Making a mistake?
They are constantly doing mistakes.
Disney: **Makes a catchy-ass song about just how vile and evil this lady is.**
Also Disney: “She’s just misunderstood!”
We totally need that man and his piano to show up in all movies and just roast the characters. Right out of the blue.
Karens in a nutshell.
The makers of the animated film were the grandparents, and the makers of this are the spoiled grandkids eager for Gramps to die.
@@DoomguyIsGrinningAtYou. "Cruella's misunderstood! I want to talk to your manager!"
Disney: Cruella De Vil, Cruella De Vil. You'll feel sorry for her. We'll make sure you will.
Disney has gotten so bad i wouldn't even pirate any of their new garbage.
Sad but true.
Disney: Hey guys! Remember Cruella? The old lady who wanted to make a coat out of puppies? Yeah so we've decided to make a live action to explain why she's misunderstood and ultimately change her origin story
Crazy how this “brilliant” character gets outsmarted by a bunch of animals in her older years😂😂 guess she declined fast
The wall is undefeated.
Not to mention most of them are puppies who are a few weeks old at best lol
Drugs. 😐
@@fejkpirat5118 The wall remains undefeated.
@@fejkpirat5118 Disney walked right into that one 😂😂
Skinning dogs for a fur coat is just Cruella's way of smashing the patriarchy, you guys.
Drinker: "Why is Disney doing this?"
Disney: "Definitely not because we ran out of ideas... 😬"
if there is one disney villain id love to see a movie about
its hades
honestly i loved his personality 10x more then any of the other characters
Hades is actually chill compared to the other gods
Cruella: I'm gonna kill 100 puppies!!
Disney: Maybe Cruella is not so bad...
Unless the puppies wouldn’t die... SOMEHOW!?!
XD
Cruella is just a normal Chinese Wahman...
She is a strong independent woman who don't need no man. Unless it's a henchman. Who she orders around.
Because you know, women need their rolemodels too.
Cruella: I'm gonna eat dogs too
China: I'm listening
Disney: Are you pleased master?
101 though
This movie should be called "The Joker Wears Prada" lol
The Joker wears a Dalmatian coat
"Cruella lives in a society"
“First, there was the animated movie back in the 1960’s, then a live-action remake in the 90’s and a sh*tty sequel in the year 2000.”
And TWO animated series: “101 Dalmatians: The Series” in the 90’s and “101 Dalmatian Street”, which premiered a couple years ago. So…yeah. Disney is obsessed with this story for some reason.
Is Disney conditioning their audience to forgive dictators? “It’s okay China, they’re learning to read in there!”
"What pisses me off about Disney"
Everything. Literally everything.
Everything but favreau filoni feige and the russos
Ha
I honestly haven't been not pissed off with anything Disney does for at least 2 years now.
It is nothing but greed, hypocrisy, spite and stupidity nowadays.
is that it's NOT DISNEY ANYMORE
What doesn't piss me off? ... uhm, they have some pretty cool rides at their amusement parks. Oh wait, the three hour wait will piss you off.
“I am a woman hear me roar” wtf it has to do with kidnapping dogs
Feminists are just as evil as people who want to skin puppies
Because she "snatches" them? Iunno.
Fuck femenist
Monke good
It has nothing to do with puppies...until the sequel. Even from the trailer I can easily tell the dalmatians are nothing more just fan service. *Hint:* She's not "old" enough
This was the result of some woke buzzword filled pitch meeting, just like all the other trash Hollywood makes these days.
I miss the days when villains were villains and didn't need a SOB story for their motivation. Sure it adds "depth" and "layers" to their character...but I don't need to feel bad for a warlord who just genocided half the kingdom because he was bullied as a kid and his dad walked out on him.
to answer your question why, it's because a lot of the biggest companies are so greedy that they'll do the lowest amount of effort that they can get away with, so basically if they gain a net profit they have no incentive to do any better
Disney: Here's a movie about a strong woman.
Also Disney: Don't listen to that real strong woman, we got rid of her.
It's fine though if they side with China against Hong Kong protesters. Or if the strong woman in the movie is literally the most evil person a child could come up with. "She's SO EVIL, she would... kill a puppy! No, ten puppies! 100 puppies!"
👏👏👏 *Well-said*
Cruella is just misunderstood. If only everyone had given her coats--each one made with the skins of 99 puppies--a chance, her genius would have been appreciated!
She too Stronk
I'm not a conservative, but god damn is there something funny about "conservative = bad, lady who wants to kill puppies = good" Disney is terrible.
Next up: Adolf
The story of a misunderstood painter that just wanted some friends
I would unironically watch that over these Disney live action films.
@@kristianburger6329 i would rather watch 24 hours of Uyghurs sitting in prison camps than anything this corporation regurgitates
Ever watched The Man in High Castle?
also starring Himmler, a young man who wants living space and Goebbels, a radio presenter looking to get his message heard
Welp, watch "The Greatest Story Never Told" and make up your own mind. 😎
I had no idea that the Cruella movie existed until this morning.
Must have been confusing on set. “Hey Emma!” Stone: “what?” Thompson: “what?”
Maybe I'm misremembering 101 Dalmatians but didn't she get outsmarted by a bunch of dogs? Can't be that "brilliant".
She was also egotistical. She would think she's the smartest person in the room. But that didn't translate to actuality.
Those dogs were freakishly intelligent. All the humans in the cartoon/movies were boarder line tards, in comparison.
hahaha
@@paulraines9635 Yeah, they were smart enough to disguise themselves with soot and cover their tracks in the snow. I'd rather see a movie about the super smart dogs.
Do you remember when the 'idea people' in Mouseworld didn't come from middle management accounting 'executive$'? I hardly do and I'm over 50.
I’m just gonna say it: Gina Carano getting fired from Disney is a blessing in disguise for her...
She'll find work in no time, I hope.
The Daily Wire picked her up already.
I'm sure she will have bright career in Ben Shapiro media. Maybe she will make some commercials with Kevin Sorbo lol
@@reav3rtm Imagine not wanting big media to have any competition... You are part of the problem.
She should look into work under some Old Timey Good Directors or in World Cinema rather than trying to get work from Hollywood. Disney has shown time and time again that they have some ridiculous power behind the scenes in Hollywood and they are not above petty politics.
3:12 - 1974 - I took the last slide-rule class they gave in my high school. A year later I got a Commodore hand calculator for a Christmas gift. That calculator lasted through two years of professional work after graduation from engineering school.