Adam Waldman Torches Amber Heard's Lawyers and Her Case
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 май 2022
- Adam Waldman was deposed earlier this year. Amber Heard's team looked to get a lot of information out of him, but they were met with nothing but walls and backfires
#adamwaldman #justiceforjohnnydepp #amberheard #amberturd
I'm not a lawyer, but it seems that calling a lawyer to the stand without attorney/client privilege waived, is the height of desperation.
No. It is done to ASK those questions. You don't necessarily need answer. Jury have already heard a bunch of a very suggestive questions. According to law it is useless but it have some influence on jury.
He's been dismissed as JD's lawyer for unethical conduct iirc.
@@aleksandrafrej8633 so you are basically agreeing it's desperation lol
@@aleksandrafrej8633 I don't think it works as well to just hear those questions asked as some think. I think more what is going to stick in people's minds is the even toned reasoned responses and reasons why they can't be answered and shouldn't be asked to begin with rather than evoke any particular suggestion of the questions.
Excellent point
When he smiled about being banned from Twitter, I felt an immediate bond with this man 😄
Badge of pride..for life...
@@Songbirdstress No greater gift can be given to a man, than a permanent Twitter ban. Yes, I'm a poet.
Why was he banned ? This whole witness lost me .
@@evelyndaisy9722 Likely telling the truth.. like most people were banned that tell the truth on Twitter. They considering disagreeing with the mainstream narrative "hate speech".
@@evelyndaisy9722 too bad story is six years long love to explain lol .but he's the best ..he's doing his job helping Johnny Depp we have all the evidence cause of this man
I keep thinking that AH's legal team is completely incompetent, but then I remember that they have an impossible task to begin with, so they're doing the only thing they can: run up their billable hours.
I don’t they’re incompetent. Their hours are racking up. It’s a hard case for them. There’re at their wits end I assume.
I thinks thats pretty much it.
Everyone else Amber went to turned her down because she had no case.
Elaine was like "I know you have no case but Ill take it because I need the money"
I'm sure it's hard to represent a client who is a pathological liar. They're not that bad it's just they're representing a lying h03. Can't help someone who lies.
Exactly
@@stevepalpatine2828 well at first is a easy case. Imagine Heard going to Elaine and Rottenborn. Look I just got sued for defamation by my husband, but he's an abuser and I already won a case where he was an abuser. Elaine: OK that's an easy case , lets go!
This 100% changed the perception of Waldman to me. Heard’s team had convinced me he was a monstrous dude. Big goof
They lie re everything.
i hope you're being sarcastic 🤣
@@missaisohee no seriously, I know nothing about the case or who this guy is outside of watching the trial (I never watched any TUG videos for example). And the imagine I had in my head was of a loud mouth jerk who was spouting off all over the place. Heard’s team brought him up a lot in a negative way. Plus I knew for some reason that he wasn’t representing Depp anymore.
I’m sure the jury had their own version of this guy imagined in their heads…but then they just dispel everything and show he’s a pretty chill dude.
Kinda like they did with the “monster” and subsequently produced pictures of him sleeping.
@@taniabluebell3099 Scary Depp Man Sleeps
I love that Adam Waldman smiles about his twitter suspension. It's a badge of honour Adam!🤣
That was gold
@@simonallen5121 I agree. She was trying to shame him. And it backfired.
Lol. .... I agree!
Elaine is the perfect example of why you need to find a lawyer that has knowledge in specific cases. Elaine's bread and butter is business, employment, and discrimination/civil rights not defamation. The reason that Adam is not working with JD on this case currently is because his specialty isn't defamation either. JD was smart enough to hire a firm that does this type of case.
Not to mention it's obvious they're used to depositions, not trials.
Spot on. I also expect Dennison to torch some other defense witnesses. Dennison is, in my opinion, a top attorney.
I also think that she’s just hamstrung by Heard and this case in general in so many ways.
@@Bapi633 But is he a SUPER Attorney?
Adam isnt working on the case because he's a witness and the link to AHs ridiculous counter claim.
Johnny’s lawyers rock. Calm, collected, polite, feisty when needed, and intelligent. We need more attorneys like this in the world.
More Queen Camilles and less Egotistical Elaines, please.
@@sundiverjl yes!! Queen Camille!!
You can tell Waldman knows how the show works. He pauses long enough to give Chew the opportunity to object, but not long enough to seem evasive or defensive.
Also, you'd have to be a real boomer not to realize that a Twitter suspension doesn't mean shit because their rules are arbitrary and enforced by ideologues.
Pretty sure most "boomers" with social media accounts fully understand that Twit and others (FB, for example) regulate their users via rules that are arbitrary and enforced by ideologues.
A gentleman-he apologised to the Court for asking to repeat the question. Like Shane Warne said good manners are free.
So were some of the beatings that Lara inflicted on Warne Lol
Rip Warne
But worth a 'million'!
How the hell did this help Amber Turd?? It ripped her a new butt!
Love the Warnie quote.
Thank Amber's team for helping Johnny's case and giving their time to him. Bless🤣
👍 🏴🏴🏴
@Ask Me If I Care
It's for 100 million childish countersuit
Mr. Waldman appears a very sympatethic person, and loyal to JD, as he should in his position. All the best for him. "I accept this video!" :D
team Hurd trying to show Waldman as being Johnny's henchman when in reality they gave Waldman a platform to tell the Jury the truth regarding Amber's lies and shenanigans .... LMAO - thanks Elaine!
I love the way he waits a couple of seconds after the question, not only to grasp the question, but to check if depps counsel advises he shuts up, and probably to strategically waste more time without looking hostile XD
I love how he looks like a passive warrior here, protecting without making it appear so
I had to do a deposition for where I work and the lawyer for my company said I should wait before answering any questions in case there was an objection to the question.
Lmao he's not waiting, it takes a few seconds for the question to come through since is virtual dummy!!
@@Korcasandromedaa nope, check the times when he really answering a question. There's no pause ...
@@preacherbill looks like A.H. didn'ta get the memo
Gosh I had completely different image of Adam in my head, what a lovely and professional man he is , nice to know
this lawyer is highly believable.. his nerdness and precision about issues gives credibility .
Im pushing 80 but if i was young..and i was hot...i totally would be attracted to this lawyer guy...i love me some brains and integrity.
this was my first time seeing him and i instantly "fell" for him, he was great. polite and completely believable. i'm glad Johnny has him on his side, and i hope some/all of her lies get exposed because of him.
Listening to Elaine question a witness is like banging your head with a door over and over...it feels so good when it stops!
🤣🤣🤣
i dunno i enjoyed watching her get stun locked in the redirect.
I think it’s funny. Umm… what if anything… 😂🤣😂
Yes, over and over again and again and again! She wanted it her way even if she had to waste all her clients time. I think they are out of time now anyway but I can see Elaine putting a new witness on the stand when they have 90 seconds left!
I love how respectful Johnny’s lawyers are to ALL of the witnesses time as opposed to Ambers lawyers. This full hour was almost all Ambers lawyers asking questions they knew he wouldn’t answer. They’ve badgered everyone INCLUDING Amber with pointless questions and inappropriate questions. Yet the accuse Johnny of wasting time 😂 what a joke.
I agree.
"Why do you think Amber is lying?"
**Waldman dishes out names and dirt**
Tell me again why they introduced this in court?
So now we got someone saying that AH’s witnesses are perjurious??? That’s devastating for AH’s case 🤯
This Attorney turned in AH and that possibly will also likely incriminate her leaching friends for perjury false statements to police etc But it’s good to know she is being investigated
We witnessed them lie on tv, body cam shows they all lied about vandalized penthouse by Johnny, it was immaculate when police walked through but a mess when Isaac got home
Wait, what did I miss?
He needed a soundboard or button, Elaine asks a question: “You can’t answer that question without violating Attorney/Client Privilege”
A simple sign to hold up "I am not going to answer that because it asks for attorney-client communications".
I was thinking that, too.
I want that soundbite on a small keychain along with the fail sound from the Price is Right & a single raspberry/ fart sound.
Just play an air horn
@@myownfan🤐😁
This strategy of asking clearly objectionable questions has a huge negative effect on the jury. They have already spent an enormous amount of time sitting there day after day listening to testimony. The jury isn't even paying attention to the questions after being asked 5 sustained questions and they start to feel this line of questioning is a waste of time. It's important to build a likable image as a lawyer with the jury. It's hard to believe the jury isn't showing impatience at some point during this testimony. Terrible move by the defense. It's also noteworthy the duration of each objection. Prolonging each objection for as many reasons as possible was also a brilliant move.
Great point! This jury has to be over it by this point, and their minds generally made up. They are going to alienate the jurors if they keep this up.
I wonder whether they left the objections in as a strategy they believed would play favorably for them, (objection = something to hide) which we all know the court cannot infer from objections. Or Amber's legal team is actually as bad as people have claimed, Eliane not realizing she's asking unanswerable questions. So either a futile idiotic strategy or oblivious questioning.
Either way, what a waste of their avalible time!
I assume a lawyer has reasons for doing this, maybe to frame the debate without any counter arguments? As a layman, I think this is bizarre. I don't get why else you'd ask a lawyer questions that clearly violate attorney-client privilege.
And not only that, she follows up already objected questions with all imaginable variations of the same question (did you talk with Depp about x, did you talk with Depp before action x, did you talk with Depp after action x, did Depp know about action x). Such a waste of time.
Maybe Elaine's strategy is to bore everyone senseless so eventually they'll slip up and let one through
This is why I’ve been saying from the start that Amber’s counter-claim was bullshit. Going after his lawyers for doing their job and protecting their client is asinine, because even if you get it to court, like now, you can’t get any evidence because of legal obligations to stay confidential, like now. It’s just so frustrating. By Amber’s logic, Depp can sue her because her lawyers repeated abuse claims when trying to prove her case. It’s ridiculous before you even look at the $100 million damages attached.
JD: 'You have cost me my entire career, I want 50 million in damages' AH: 'oh yeah? Oh yeah? Well, then I demand HUNDRED MILLION.'
I think Amber's counterclaim isn't just bullshit, it's counter productive to her defense. She could have kept her mouth shut and not have to prove she was abused, it would have been solely up to Depp to prove there was no abuse - she really shot herself in the foot being spiteful and petty, going tit-for-tat against Depp.
She's learning what happens when you poke the gentle bear too often.
AH is not only psychopathic and delusional, but completely detached from reality. Johnny is suing for the lost of his mega long-standing career earnings loss. Turd is a nobody compared to Depp, yet she thinks her value monetarily is worth double than his. This proves not only is she insane, but extremely dangerous. YIKES!
@@baskoning9896 This is literally her thought process
Now the solid 20 minutes of objections at Elaine until she gave up make perfect sense. The jury must be looking at this depo and thinking all the more she is a bad lawyer.
Watching this again, Waldman was absolutely stellar in this deposition.
Also Runkle brought up a good point last night on his livestream. Why would you want your client’s name and perjury in the same sentence mentioned that many times?!?! It’s crazy.
Yeah Ambers Lawyers are certainly not the best XD
@@Marcelg13 also makes me wonder a couple of things. 1. Is Amber calling the shots and that’s why they suck? 2. How do lawyers this bad make that much $$ per hour? and 3. Are they somehow doing this crap on purpose because they don’t like Amber either but win or lose they still get paid. Lots more questions but those are the biggest ones.
@@SquidProQuo1 I think it's all of the above, and they don't have any bullets left, so they let the time run out. I was wondering why Elaine would ask these questions when she knows well that he can't answer them due to Attorney privilege. Amber's Team has 8 Hours left, and Johnny's Team has 18 Hours left which is suicidal because if Amber's Team has no time left they can't Cross Exam Johnny's Witnesses which is hilarious. In that case, I would bring up Kate Moss and the Policewomen who witnessed the DA between Amber and her Ex Girlfriend.
@@SquidProQuo1 Have to spend those hours somewhere... Maximise the billable work even if you can't win.
@@_Ekaros any bets on if Amber sues her legal team if/when she loses this case?!
The Adam Waldman testimony was hilarious, I don't know what the hell Amber's side were doing bringing him on. He literally brought in a load of evidence that was probably inadmissible due to their open ended questions & also let him say he had his own reasons for believing Amber was a fraud. I burst out laughing when they asked, "so when you found out Amber wasn't being investigated by LAPD for Perjury did you post a correction?" And he calmly replies, well no it wasn't the LAPD that was investigating it was the LA County Sheriffs department that was investigating her for Perjury and the desk sergeant told me!".
Because it was Amber's side that asked the question they then couldn't object to it & the testimony comes in - what a total own goal the jury just heard Amber is being investigated for Perjury!! She's done after that.
It was a component of her counterclaim. They cited his remarks so they had to bring him in or the claim would be tossed.
@@polivepea maybe so but ask closed questions else you lose the main case. They burned through so much of their own time, their client was shown to be being investigated for perjury and Adam Waldman comes across as a choir boy rather than some malicious bully. Elaine was bad but Rottenborne totally sunk AH's case with the open questions, they sabotaged themselves. If JD had brought that stuff in it would have been a miss trial, that's how bad it is for AH.
so Many wrong comments! Let's do this for the 100 time!
Stay with me.......
ADAM was called because she's attaching him to the $100 million she's seeking in damages by the supposed smear campaign Johnny and Adam supposedly did against her.
Which is false because the #'s
Against amber grew strong the beginning of 2020 because of the recordings right before COVID hit.
The trial is almost over so ambers team brought Adam because of ambers countersuit.
@@polivepea exactly, a lot of yesterday was about proving her counterclaims of defamation and loss of income. The problem is that her testimony, cross examination, redirect, and the witness testimonies had done very little to build up her defense. They should have just realized the countersuit was a Longshot and focused on just defense against Johnny's claims.
@@Korcasandromedaa I understand why they called him but it was a complete own goal, they not only lost the counter claim but they've also now lost the main case as well.
AH credibility went to zero when Adam said she was being investigated for perjury & listed the evidence and witnesses that contradicted her.
Adam also has a legitimate reason to make the claims in the newspaper on his own accord because of the evidence and irrespective of what JD may or may not have told him.
How he managed to raise the 'perjurious statements' stuff without a big grin on his face .... good job Mr Waldman!
I've tried to count and I've heard "You can't answer that question without violating Attorney/client Privilege" a total of 89 times PLEASE some correct me if I'm wrong this whole video had me crying
I think the combo was 12 times in a row.
Wow
Damn, how did you manage to get through the entire thing without falling asleep... You should count the amount of objections Camille made against elaine after Camille finished questioning amber and elaine took over. elaine asked questions for like 30 minutes straight and only 3 of them managed to actually get through, the rest were all objected and amber wasn't allowed to answer, she even stormed out of court before the jury which is a big no no, that's how pissed she was because of how bad it went but someone needs to provide an actual count of the objections...
@@MGperX yep. Asmon was keeping track and I remember it hit 12. "Oh boy the record is 11, let's see if we can hit 12." And then she hit 12.
@@DrakeOola I was bored when i saw the video :p .
When watching i got curious how many times takes for Amber heards lawyer to get the Memo when it comes of not being able to ask anything Depp related GOD THEY'RE 12 YEARS OLDS
this was pretty amazing to watch. Mr. Waldman was calm and polite, Ben didnt lose his shit, kept his professional obligations all the while Elaine tried her best to break every rule. I am beginning to understand why Heards side did not want these to be live witnesses. Not to mention, this looks great on Depps lawyers.
The whole day yesterday was a waste of time spent for Amber’s side. No one said they saw JD being violent while on drugs and alcohol. The only people who claim he was violent were her free-loading penthouse “friends”. They were too deep into the lie that they couldn’t backtrack.
@@minuete82 well besides the jilted ex Smurf
That dude IS The Umbrella Man. Check the Voice. Lmao. Now wonder TUG had so much inside info.
@@jenncutt1571 Spit my drink out on that comment. I loved her as Smurf and hated that they killed her off, but understand after a few of her costars said she was horrible to work with. Of course she used the typical excuse of “I’m too old and not the right gender” bullshit excuse.
@@SchreeSR lol I'm glad I could entertain. I actually quit watching after season 2. I should catch up
I love how the Judge has fought darn hard to not let the internet get into the trial, and Elaine and Rottie have brought the whole thing in. lol Aided and abetted by AH "Look me up on the internet" herself.
She hates that she's being mocked and ridiculed, not realizing that it's her own actions that have caused this.
She could have just walked away, paid the charities like she said she would and moved on with her life.
She chose to try and ruin Johnnys life and its all blown up in her face.
She thinks the Internet laughing at the ridiculous person she is is defamation, and she blames Johnny because, in her "I do no wrong" mind, he's the reason she's being laughed at, because if she hadn't tried to ruin him, nonone would have cared who she is.
She has no one to blame but herself.
Correction, Amber's team pushed for a complete media blackout and JD's team successfully argued against it. The judge has not personally been in favor or against media. If your comment was based on her stance against cell phone useage in her court room it is common for judge's to be against them in general.
@@lordhawkeye i think they’re talking about when ambers lawyers brought in that guy yesterday talking about the hashtags. so now the jury know that most ppl are on johnny’s side
@@lordhawkeye no they didn't want it televised
@@lordhawkeye Normal court rules. Jury mustn't have outside information. Why criminal case juries get sequestered.
"I'm trying. Im trying"
She's trying guys.
What, if any trying is she doing?
Objection!
i thought her name was Elaine
"DO ... or DO NOT! There is no try!" - some old short green guy on a swampy planet.
🤣🤣
I find her very trying.
I see this as her just wanting the jury to hear the questions regardless of an answer. In this case though, it doesn’t help at all.
@Robin Justice I don't think AH's team thought the answer would go there and since it was on the deposition, I don't know that they could remove it, especially if JD's team wanted it to stay in... not sure how that works but seems to me they let the cat out of the bag
@Robin Justice agreed but I think they wanted it in to argue that he was cagey but I was saying more I don't think they can selectively edit it
but her asking these questions is using up their time, whereas the objections don't use up any time. this explains a lot of how they have 10 less hours left
@@rosestewart1606 true but it is their own fault. Elaine is addicted to leading questions and hearsay
I can’t get over how smart and pleasant he comes off. Complete opposite of the attention-seeking, abuse-denier mouthpiece they needed to show. Imagine paying your legal team millions thinking they’ll make good decisions for you & you end up with this. 🥴
With Amber's personality, I don't think she is allowing them to make good decisions on her behalf. they are just her representatives and she is likely taking that to the hilt, Demanding that they do things and ask things that they probably advise against but she demands they do anyway, and since they don't outright break laws they are just doing their client's wishes. Sometimes it's worse for a lawyer to have a bullheaded demanding client than it is to just plain have an incompetent and guilty one.
I mean to be fair, I see that she holds the reins in the relationship - much like in every other aspect of her life 😕 there were clear moments of her breaking Elaine's expected responses to line of questioning, so she isn't one to be lead even by her own team
This is so well said
From what we’ve heard and seen from Amber, that’s her, not them. She’s intimidating and threatening...and they reflect that.
Important to point out the client has ultimate decision making power. Amber Heard's team could have told her this testimony is devastating to her case and she should just give up her countersuit and not show it. Heard could likely see herself and her witnesses performances as believable enough and not understanding the damage of this testimony could have pushed for it, knowing that establishing a link between Mr. Waldman, Depp and the statements were the only way to win her counterclaim. Remember with her possible BPD, she could easily dwell in such a delusional fantasy world and convince herself her case and her "truth" was the "truth". And I think it quite likely she lied to her legal team about multiple things and delivered coerced witnesses along with her own continually changing and embellished disaster of a testimony....
This was the first time I actually saw and heard Adam Waldman and he's great! Super chill and mild mannered. It's actually pretty similar to my impression of Ben Chew. Seems like Johnny has a type when it comes to lawyers?
I swear that at least 50 percent of this testimony was "i would instruct the client....". Good god, that Bredehoff woman just asked the same question 10 different ways on many subjects... was she trying to make the jury commit seppuku or something ?
From the freakin get-go I got severe PSTD symptomes each and every time she was about to oapen her mouth, lol
HAHAHA. Your comment is hilarious. 'Seppuku' hahahahaa
I think the plan was to make the jury think "wow he can't disclose communications with his client? He must be hiding something!"
I know my phone wanted to commit sudoku about 1/4 through. I can still hear that line.
Hahahahahaha I peed a little
I very much enjoyed the Waldman bit.
Nice well presenting guy with some strong convictions and a flavour for orderly conduct. Elaine did not make herself look good trying to mess with him.
The twitter problems made him immediately favourable to me irrespective of other testimony.
It's incredible that her team thought this would do her case any good.
I think they’re out of ideas. Also doesn’t help when Amber kept rambling and making up stories in her testimony that had made their job even more difficult.. I kind of feel bad for them at this point lol
By now Amber should have fired Elaine
@@1912papa Except who else does she have? No sane lawyer will take this psycho's case after she torches Miss Meow Mix.
@@aloha_oe311 yeah that grab for attention. Her need for attention wrecked him....yikes. Makes me sick.
@@1912papa she can't. Not without judges permission, and the lawyer would have to be grossly incompetent. Judge doesn't want to waste more of anyone's time due to the length of it all so far. They are very reluctant to spend more money and human attention on a case that has gone pretty smoothly. All things considered.
I’ve never needed a lawyer in my 40 yrs of being on this earth but if I ever do I do hope to god I don’t get an Elaine to represent me 😂
why is that?
it's actually a team of lawyers and they're doing a bang up job
the thing with bringing the computer genius and understanding twitter was brillliant
It only looks like she's doing a terrible job because her client is the devil and they're trying to convince a jury that she's not the devil, but she keeps showing them that she's the devil.
@@christophercolumbus8944 Maybe because Elaine doesnt seem to know her own professions rules of conduct, and can't even frame her questions properly?
It doesnt help that her client is a liar with no case though, I think Elaine knows this and is just running up as big a bill as she can.
@@stevepalpatine2828 why don't you offer an alternative ? what should she do instead ?
...
let's just say you johnny junkie fan boys will dismiss anything
you HATE EVERYTHING about amber heard
that's pathetic
@@flakesinyershoe8137 the devil is HOT!!!! then
but the trouble is she couldn't help getting assaulted by a junkie
searched for drugs in her private area
LOL I am cackling. I am so glad I went back to watch this stream. Rekieta, don't quit your day job, but please keep it up with your random singing. 😆
How is it possible that an attorney on this level, with this much experience, keeps asking questions that will be 100% objected to?
She loves wasting all of her team's time.
Running up the clock to get paid more?
its for the jury, to plant ideas. not working of course, but that's the thinking I guess.
I heard Nick say in one the streams this week that she always settled out of court…so she’s lacking trial experience…I’d seriously be ashamed if I was in her shoes she’s not getting any work after this…
I think Elaine is over Amber I don’t know lol
I loved this because he basically summarized Johnny's arguments from this trial in the video.
Amber's team had the ball, and they ran straight to the wrong side of the field.
Heck, they put it in their own net
💯😂
I'm stunned they thought that calling a top lawyer in to testify against his client who is clearly innocent would be a good idea pmsl.
yeah this has to be the first thing you learn in lawyer school no one can force you to disclose your communications with your client
They thought they could swindle the judge into instructing the jury to take a negative inference from these non answers. What they didn’t realize is that Attorney client privilege is NOT grounds for negative inference. Just as someone pleading the 5th isn’t grounds for negative inference.
He looks like Clark Kent! I love his honesty. He looks like a genuinely good guy and stands for what he believes in at any cost.
Yes I adore him!
The point that needs to be made is that allowing an attorney to answer one privileged question could be a waiver of the privilege for a lot of follow-up questions that would otherwise be privileged.
But after attempt number 50 at minute 30, don't you think you'd abandon that track?
@@CptnCardboard Not if they are deliberately attempting to deceive a jury that is not that nuanced, possibly.
@@CptnCardboard Untrained jurors might think that the attorney would answer questions when it was helpful for his client. The judge may instruct them not to draw any inferences, but that's not our brains work:
Refusing to answer = Hiding.
If someone does not clarify the nuances of A/C privilege for them, it's a negative for JD.
@@pjparkjd But here's the problem. it's not refusing to answer. it's even less refusing to answer than some of the objecting to questions that got pulled. They are listening to an even toned and reasoned. "This is a question that we cannot answer even to say we don't have an answer." over and over again. They are outright being told repeatedly like a jackhammer, not "i'm refusing to answer the question" but "Because of Legal and Fairness reasons I am completely barred from actually even trying to answer the question even if I wanted to." That is very different from. "No, I don't want to answer." He answered everything that he could and wasn't barring from even trying to answer.
@@Quandry1 Just because you know that doesn't mean your brain does.
So in short, the lesson here is that when you want to talk shit about anyone in the press, get your lawyer to do it!
or be a concerned citizen.
That's heatda entire argument though. And it seems JD didn't z the lawyer just disliked her so much he talked shit about her on his own
@@JohnDoe-vm5rb the problem on heards side is her lawyer approves the op Ed saying it doesn't imply depp.. yet it covers the time-frame when they were married.
@@jacecrawford6015 the Super Lawyer did a great job with that. Here's a thought, Amber: don't commit defamation.
And then don't tweet out that or tell that you made those statements...
I like the little shadow of a smile on Adam's face when he accepts Ben's instruction.
What if any of these questions did Elaine expect Waldman to be able to answer.
😂😂😂😂😂
LoL. Waldman was allowed to summarize his understanding for the Jury before the trial ends that JD was not the abuser and AH made it up. He recalled a list of witness by name. AH legal team is a mess.
Wow, lawyers develop a lot of patience. Any other witness would have shown visible annoyance from constant inappropriate questions. Also, Ben Chew is a boss keeping focused on objections.
Ben Chew need to be alert, so Adam Waldman doesn't slip out confidential attorney-client communication, which Elaine can use against JD's team. Which is why Elaine is persisting to ask the same question, over and over again.
What's interesting is that Waldman's statements seemed like a good explanation at the time-but it turns out that reality is even more bizarre. The body cam footage from the 2nd police visit shows that the AH and her friends didn't realize they needed to fake the evidence and spill the wine and place the photo frames on a bed until AFTER all the police had left. IncrediblyAverage (ThatBrianFella) has the best explanation for this-they weren't expecting to have to go through with the hoax so they did a sloppy job prepping for the extortion attempt. So appalling that Josh Drew had the gaul to purger himself by testifying that the police officers stepped over glass when entering the PH. Clearly he didn't know about the body cam footage either. In any case, Walman was right in spirit in his statements about the hoaxers
A summary: "I'll advise you not to answer that question..."
Not answering questions due to attorney-client privilege doesn't look evasive or "hiding" to me, just as if you have a security clearance, it's illegal to disclose controlled information (you can even get in trouble for insinuating you have knowledge of something controlled) without proper authorization. I just don't understand what Heard's lawyer was hoping to gain here.
Hoping the JURY doesn't understand it like you do.
@@truthbetold1855 Why do you think that?
Turds lawyers ficking hate her i think.
@@ingiford175 Probably wanted to show that "They're instructing him not to answer, they have something to hide." Which they're not allowed to do.
@@ingiford175 because the average person has cognition and perception abilities on par with a pop tart
Lol the smile from waldman when he acknowledged he was suspended on Twitter for life.
This is one of the more frustrating things to listen to ever. The law should include a provision for caning a lawyer who asks the same question too many times. In public.
Chuckling
Most people are not represented by a lawyer and some lawyers are better or worse than others.
By repeatedly asking the questions rephrased you can sometimes trip a person up. Sometimes the other side's lawyer can miss the similarities but most the time they wouldn't.
Investigators do this all the time but slip other questions in between. You can usually tell if someone is telling the truth or not based around subtle differences in the answers. But some liars often start adding lots of unsolicited details like framing a scene in a book thinking you didn't get their story the first time. It's almost as if Elaine is larping as a detective for a police department or something. Maybe she took the criminal justice how to be a private eye class at the local community college as part of her continuing education requirements.
I think strike per question is just fair.
@@sumduma55 after 30 successful objections in a row and under 3 hours, the layer should be disbarred
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If I was a juror, I would be pissed that so much of my time had been wasted with this bullshit. Amber’s team is horrible and actually causing more damage to her reputation, if that is even possible. Yikes
I’d be sitting there scratching my head wondering wtf is going on…😆
@@dyanalynn6698 All you have to understand is that the guy is part of JD's legal team and that elaine keeps asking stupid questions that he's not even allowed to answer because of client privileges. Her line of questioning is trying to prove that JD forced him to write the "slam articles" about amber, that depp is directly responsible for his actions and that his actions are defamation, untrue statements that ruined her reputation and made her lose out on jobs and by extension money. This line of questioning was for her $100 million dollar defamation countersuit against JD and elaine knows she's not allowed to ask and he's not allowed to answer but she's asking them anyway in an attempt to plant the ideas in the juries mind. It's a stupid move tho because it just shows how incompetent she is and puts half the jury to sleep having to hear all these questions getting denied.
It's like asking them "is it not true that he held a gun to your head and threatened to kill you while calling you a POS and asking you think you're so tough motherf***er", that question will undoubtedly get objected but the jury will still hear it and it'll leave doubt in their mind like "wow did he actually say that" and they also might think "why are his lawyers trying to silence them from answering, maybe it has some credibility", that's elaines whole strategy, ask questions that make JD look bad even if the judge tells them to disregard it. That's what her whole line of questioning was with amber after Camille was done with her and that's what she's doing here. A good example was when she was saying "isnt it true you visited a doctor and they told you you had scar tissue in your nose", even though amber couldn't answer any of those questions it still plants the idea in the juries mind and leaves them wondering "how did she get that scar tissue in her nose?"
It's extremely underhanded and unethical and that's why Camille was getting so pissed off and trying to object to get her to shut up. Same when Camille presented those text messages as evidence and elaine was like "your honor I object she's leaving out the last 2 lines that would provide context", you're supposed to ask to approach the judge to mention things like that, she could lose her license for underhanded tactics like that by basically telling the jury "hey guys she left the context out of this so take it with a grain of salt", you'll notice that elaines team kept playing 3 second audio clips of JD yelling obscenities while leaving out the context like when he was yelling "you make me fucking sick" after he had his finger chopped off and only played that specific part out of like an hour long audio, Camilles team didn't object and say "well you left the context out and we should show the jury that too" because they're supposed to go up to the judge and talk about that in private. Elaine is grossly skidding the line of ethics and she should have her license removed for these attempts and you can visibly see the judge pissed off at her for trying this shit... Even her catchphrase "what if any", she got into multiple arguments about it because she's asking leading questions and thinking that fixes things. I really hope she never gets another job ever again and gets barred from the practice because it's disgusting...
@@DrakeOola Small correction: This guy is Depp's lawyer in other stuff, but he doesn't deal with defamation cases, so he's not part of the legal team representing Depp in this case. Just like you don't go to a dentist with a broken arm.
@@DrakeOola you know during the trial I found myself giving Elaine the benefit of the doubt.. she’s under pressure, nervous, has AH for a client etc… especially when doing her cross of amber in rebuttal phase… she was clearly exhausted. But her closing and the MSM interviews she’s done since the verdict… the sh*t she’s spewing 🤬😡🤬
It was hilarious when Rottenborn tried to get the instruction to essentially disqualify this testimony and the judge quickly said “Well… you guys are the ones who played his deposition with all of the verbal objections… you could’ve edited it all out but you wanted to imply to the jury that Waldman was hiding things”.
The revelation of twitters ungodly power to gag anyone for me was a breath of fresh air to be heard round the world
"To be HEARD" I see what you did there 😁
yeah that will be enough evidence to nail your junkie boy johnny
@@michigreen8943 I dont use it but millions of stupid people are affected by it, and then they affect more normal peoples lifes to miserable ends.
Waldman was so good. I laughed so hard when he said the investigation was not by the LAPD but by the LA county sheriff.
Elaine's justification for all the dumb questions: Well, why not? It's not like we'll run out of time and be forced to to compress our case.
Can definitely see Ryan Reynolds play Waldmam in the movie.
😆
So....true lmao
You’re exactly right!
Laura L omg that would be perfect wouldn’t it lol
Except he'd have a DIFFICULT time not making off handed comments. Ha hab
At least this line of questioning had very few, if any, “what if any” questions
Yes I'm so sick of her
I’m parroting lawtube observations. They they concluded the cross when Rottenborn allowed Adam to describe May 21 was a bad move by the defense. Adam listed all the witnesses who did not corroborate the claims made by Amber and her friends.
Why dont you THINK YOURSELF instead of "parroting what others said"?
Foreshadowing closing 😊
Because I don’t want to take credit for their observations.
Is that your only contribution, to chide people in the comments and not bring added value feedback.
Telling with no picture and fake name.
@@taniabluebell3099 bonus: very boomer, unnecessary, usage of “”
@@theotherserge *incorrect, usage of ""
Thank God JD has good attorneys. She can't get away with her redundant questioning.
You guys never heard of “blinking bruises”??? Those are bruises that show up and go away for minutes, hours, or days and then return. Some can do it at will. Some will go away and reappear if they detect a camera in the room.
FUNNY !!!
17:18 If it weren't clear before how hard Elaine is losing this deposition and how badly she is taking it, this was certainly the moment!
Aside from the questions being inappropriate, I don't see how they're substantial to winning the case even if Waldman did answer them.
This Mendel case has nothing with Amber ! I think that this is an abuse of process .
It's for Amber's $100mil counter-claim. They HAD to ask, they had no choice
Elaine was trying to prove it was JD who 'forced' the attorney to post those "defamation posts" against amber on JD's behalf. She's trying to counter sue him for $100 million dollars but to do that she needs to prove JD was responsible which is hard to do when JD hardly spoke about the matter, it was all this guy whos being questioned that 'leaked' everything to the public. She's never going to win the countersuit tho, those statements have to be untrue for it to be defamation and it needs to have been done in gross and neglectful disregard for the truth and purposefully done to hurt her career. Neither of those things are true so it's stupid she's even tried to counter sue, it just weakens her claim of "i wanted nothing" even more and here I thought she couldn't do that. She already got caught stealing the $7 mil she promised to charity and now this???...
This just shows how weak of an attorney Elaine is. She thinks she can spar with another attorney and she cannot!!
I honestly after Amber's sister can't imagine being a jury member listening to all of this sober or without commentary.
Facts! Rekeita’s the only way I can get through any of this trial! So tedious and BS. I hope the jury is seeing it ugh it’s going to be a big whoops on them if they find her not guilty and have to live the rest of their lives seeing all the evidence against her not shown in court.
I think Elaine likes to hear her own voice she questioned Dr Curry forever Isaac Baruch a bond now Mr Waldman
It seems like Adam is actually enjoying this verbal duel.
Was there ANYTHING useful for Elaine in this? At ALL?
I had never seen this man before. In my mind I imagined him like some mob boss who may have had the sole job to handle press stuff….like a gate keeper behind the scenes. This is not what I expected. This is pleasant.
I had the exact same thought! This was terrible, for Heard, you never show the boogeyman you just make it seem like he’s out there.
If I could afford him, I would hire him lol.
Literally the same idea in my head of how he was. This video further sunk their already sinking ship.
He is a legend
And got banned from twitter for life by feminazis,amberstans for reveiling the truth to public.
He leaked the police dashcam and turds recordings to independent and youtube Journalists
Bcz the mainstream media can't be trusted they would have edited the audios to favor amber.
He got my respect 👍👍👍👍👍.
The fact that he apologises the to jury implies that he would like to answer the questions asked, but AH's team are just so incompetent in understanding the legal reason he cant he has to keep rejecting their questions.
This is further impacted by the fact that he doesnt have a single question asked by JDs team that gets objected to in regards to the attorney client privilege.
Tell me this guy doesn't look like Coulson in SHIELD in the marvel movies, with glasses.
He doesnt look like Coulson
If a lawyer asks questions they know the witness can't answer or shouldn't answer without waving their rights or privledges in an effort to make them slip up, they should be charged with obstruction of justice.
I agree. They were trying to get him disbarred. They're so nasty.
💯
You’ve gotta feel kind of sorry for Heard’s counsel. When your client is a pathological liar and a toxic narcissist running out the clock is pretty much all you’ve got left. I really don’t think having another defense witness impeach their client’s testimony is going to be a winner in the end.
I mean. I don’t HAVE to 😂
They can always say no
The jury found the same thing Mr Waldman did about the fake sexual assault and cops found no injury on Heard so why did Johnny have to pay Amber I don't get it what he said was true
This is so ridiculous. I have no idea how Elaine passed the bar. 🤦♀️
A video of lawyers watching lawyers depose a lawyer who is being advised yet another lawyer...
As Legal Mindset put it: LAWYERCEPTION!
I have to wonder what she was trying to achieve calling a witness that she knew, could not answer most of the questions she was asking. Was she hoping he would slip up or something?
My theory is that she hopes the jury will think JD is hiding something and not grasp how important attorney-client privilege is. She knows that attorneys are subject to disciplinary action if they break attorney-client privilege and she is counting on the jury not knowing that. All of which makes Elaine a condescending a**.
She knew before she played it if he "slipped up" or not. She didn't have to play this, and I think she could have better utilized that hour she wasted.
It's because this is two trials in one. Johnny's suit and Amber's counter-suit.
This is for the counter-suit, she has to ask these questions because Amber is making them, basically.
Hmm okay. However, I would have thought they would advise Amber that a majority of the questions would be invalidated by attorney-client privilege. Unless they did, and she insisted anyway. In which case... Well she seems to have wasted everyone's time.
@@Banzai431 They likely did, yet she insisted anyway. I get the feeling she is entirely out of control
Johnny came home
In his bed found a turd
A gift for him left
By his ex, Amber Heard.
Too bad that never happened ... because JD never saw it IRL and was already living elsewhere.
Beautiful poem. Invoked a powerful vision of that fateful day...
🐒💨💦💩🛏
That is, without a doubt, the worst attorney I've ever seen.
Which one? Amber’s attorneys?
@@Shnapsass It's a Pirates joke, mate. But, yes, Amber's.
Jesus can this woman not ask the same types questions lmfao
How much pattern recognition does this lady lack
Its annoying when people do that. It's like shes trying to get every person with the "ah ha but you said this before".
The older you get the less flexible you are ... especially if you didnt have to "train" the verbal skills to be flexible in your phrasing ... because you had a big club (feminism) that threatens everyone who oppses it.
In any case it is about an hour of WASTED TIME for "team AH".
When you don't have a case, you try to throw crap and see what sticks.
She knows exactly what she's doing. The point here is to create the idea that Depp's team is trying to hide information. It's a shit attempt, but an attempt nonetheless.
She's not a quick study...
Elaine looked like she's trying to replicate Camille's brilliant barrage of questions but ended up producing a twisted humiliating version of it.
I’m wondering why nobody is mentioning how low-tone Amber’s “ friends “ are - they have no problem saying the F word - and worse- in a court of law to a judge 😱🤦♀️. They all look so classy, the women testifying while obviously stoned… it’s a real trailer park situation when her friends and sister show up stoned and cursing…
Just no respect or dignity
Amber sister had no problem saying "one of the few times I was actually sober", in front of the whole world and didnt bat an eye
@@basedcoins 😂😂😂
I apologize to trailer park residents for comparing them to AH and her grifter user friends - really sorry I should have said Vermin…
LMAO You caught the "some appendage"!! Because somewhere within Turd's multiple witness statements, she literally said "one of Johnny's appendage". It sent us cackling.
Fell a little in love with Adam Waldman yesterday...Immaculate and what a vibrant, shining contrast to opposing counsel!❤❤
I’m beginning to think her team is done with her. She’s thrown them under the bus so many times I don’t think they care what happens to her. They’re going through the motions
Maybe it's in response to her blaming her previous lawyers for submitting images to People Magazine. They don't want to be thrown under the bus by another Amber lie
Naa they won’t be because they know that if they lose it impacts then financially for future work as well. Even though she throws them under the bus they’ll keep working hard for her.
Wow! Isn't Elaine giving Heard grounds for suing incompetent lawyers? This waste of time alone would convince even a moderate observer that Heard's case is groundless and has no "teeth"
They ask if Adam Waldman witnessed anything between JD and AH to try showing falsehood of his claims. But does Elaine there when JD attacked AH? She wasn't probably, but tries to prove that he did anyways.
Exactly 💯💯."were you there"
Lmao 🤣 I hope Elaine is paid a hefty sum of money. After this insane fumble no one should ever hire her
I'm convinced this deposition was done entirely to drain another hour of legal work from Amber Turd's bank account.
a patsy that will make a clown of herself for money in the courtroom is always useful
@@Frank-bc8gg do you think she knows she's lying? I think she's being lied to as well but who tf knows
After Vazquez objected to Elaine’s questioning earlier and now this, Penny has to think this is the worse lawyer ever before her
You are a lawyer, Adam! Not a wizard.
*shoked pikachu face*
@@thesorrow88 Hagrid you are, wizard!
I’m glad you reposted this Nick, I was dazed out during the trial with all the video depositions. This is very interesting.
Same here, thanks to Nick
Why call him in the first place? Everything this man knows is protected by the attorney client/privilege, what were they thinking??? Just wasting their remaining hours...
It sometimes feels they pad things up to cover they have nothing .
She's charging the Turd by the hour.
All this is just padding the bill at this point.
The fact that Team Amber have wasted so much of the court's and the jury's time with these fucking interminable fishing expeditions must, in and of itself, have pissed off the latter enough to have biased them against Heard by now. Well played. Paid by the hour I guess, so they want the trial to go to its time limit. And this might be totally ad hom, but Elaine Bredehoft does NOT have a voice that's pleasant to listen to (sounds like she just never had the pipes that would endure all those years talking publicly in court), for hours at a time it would drive me nuts.
This woman failed so hard, I expect to see her appointed Fed AG next month. 😂
Watching this I have to believe her attorneys dislike her so much that they are trying to make her lose. This is the worst lawyering I've ever seen.
I agree. It’s mind blowing and utterly painful to listen to.
Adam Waldman's skin is on point.
Great advertisement. 👍
Rewatching this I am now 76% convinced that Elaine was trying to show Amber some of what lawyers ARE NOT ALLOWED to do on their client's behalf lmfao.
I am really bummed I haven't been able to follow the trial with Rekieta this time around. Thank you for providing some clips!
Struggling to see how this was valuable to Amber's case...
Nevermind, upon googling him, it gave the press an opportunity to smear him for declining to answer questions
The press is wild. They report on the most mundane shit, and never give the actual pulse of the trial. If I only read headlines, I would think AH had such a strong case. But watching the trial, I think this is hers to lose, even if JD's claim is actually the harder case to win legally
@@UnhungHero I think MSM is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Can’t remember last time I read a paper. They’re grasping at straws and can’t admit it.
I still can't believe Heard has an attorney named "Rottonborn". I thought that was just people replacing a part of his name with "rotten" but no, his name really is Rottonborn. That's not a name I would keep. Especially if I were to become an attorney.
"I have been suspended from twitter for life"
"So do you have a twitter account now"
"I.."
"Advise the witness not to answer the question as he has a right not to self incriminate"
"I accept this advice"
Elaine is the kind of person who would play 20 questions and ask the same question 20 times.
I don't have all the info from outside the trial, so now I'm glad to finally understand why Amber's team is so intent on constantly mentioning Marilyn Manson. It seemed so strange for them to constantly pull out this guilt by association weirdness, but now this fine gentleman just made sure I know that Manson has provided compelling evidence. Not sure who Amber's lawyers are even helping at this point, but that is a useful little tidbit
They've pretty much made MM public Enemy # 1 Gezz. I wish him all the luck in his case. I think he's innocent too.
Yeah I'm so confused about it
What's with manson exactly? I've watched pretty much every minute of the trial and every video about it but I started tuning out on all these video depositions, still no idea what manson was about...