Why is nobody talking about the 2:40 to 3:10 part of the video? The water looks terrible on the ps3! No reflections, terrible refraction and why the hell are the shadows missing at the first scene? There is one more water scene but you can only really make out the difference at the very start if you look closely as the waterfall covers up the rest of the scene.
Ive played the game on both console at some point and all i notice is a little more screen tearing on the ps3. If you can ignore that both games are great expiriences and loads of fun, nomatter what you play it on.
Mystic Gamer That's surprising seeing as how the 360 always struggled with screen tearing using the AMD graphics card while the PS3 version typically didn't using the Nvidia graphics processor but because developers could figure out the PS3s tech struggled with framerate issues. I find it interesting with the screen tearing but wouldn't argue the minor occasional frame dips on occasion dropping to 28 vs the 360s solid 30.
Honestly this comparison is not good. Simply because each had to recorded first then chopped and merged together using some type of video editing software which reprocesses the video into a single split screen video. That would alter the outcome of the over all point that is trying to be made. If you want a real comparison you have to look at each one side by side on 2 identical model TV's using the same HDMI cables. That way all the hardware/software is a match except the consoles themselves.
Игры
![BETA SQUAD vs AMP FOOTBALL MATCH [OFFICIAL STREAM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ChEmvP52p0U/mqdefault.jpg)
Why is nobody talking about the 2:40 to 3:10 part of the video? The water looks terrible on the ps3! No reflections, terrible refraction and why the hell are the shadows missing at the first scene? There is one more water scene but you can only really make out the difference at the very start if you look closely as the waterfall covers up the rest of the scene.
to make a clear comparison of the true pontentials u should record each 1 with an hdmi cable and obviously make the vid 1080p
Ive played the game on both console at some point and all i notice is a little more screen tearing on the ps3. If you can ignore that both games are great expiriences and loads of fun, nomatter what you play it on.
Mystic Gamer That's surprising seeing as how the 360 always struggled with screen tearing using the AMD graphics card while the PS3 version typically didn't using the Nvidia graphics processor but because developers could figure out the PS3s tech struggled with framerate issues. I find it interesting with the screen tearing but wouldn't argue the minor occasional frame dips on occasion dropping to 28 vs the 360s solid 30.
omg i miss this game.....
I think they looks identically :)
Honestly this comparison is not good. Simply because each had to recorded first then chopped and merged together using some type of video editing software which reprocesses the video into a single split screen video. That would alter the outcome of the over all point that is trying to be made. If you want a real comparison you have to look at each one side by side on 2 identical model TV's using the same HDMI cables. That way all the hardware/software is a match except the consoles themselves.
0:48 the xbox has more shadows look at the man with the suit ^^
@szakigeri 3:13 4:55 ps3 is better. But i think the differences are so small i doesn't matter at all.
@coolcar100 o well then there is no real way to compare them then, specially since the pc graphics are being watched in pc
3:38 ps3 - fail
not difference
beast
ok um texture looks so damn bad compare to the pc version....