That is when console optimization comes into play. A PC game is re-formatted to run on a console with hardware restrictions by cutting AA, texture resolutions, etc. The graphics are pretty good on the console, considering how old they are(PS3 Cell and RSX began development in 2004, Xbox 360 Xenon/Xenos in 2005).
Guys actually I think it's good for a 10 years old consoles that they can stay at solid 30 fps I played a lot of bf3 on xbox 360 never been intrested in frame rates untill I got xbox one and noticed some in bf4 multiplayer but I always been satisfied with my experience on xbox 360
Well, every other "tech expert" would disagree. CoD for PS3 isn't as good as CoD for the 360 however, BF3 for PS3 is better than BF3 for the 360 since even DICE has said it (they added some more advanced graphical effects exclusively on the PS3). Also, i don't care what happened to your BF3 on your 360, the fact of the matter is that for everyone else on the 360, BF3 has the issues shown here. On the PS3 it isn't much better at all, but it still is still slightly better. Plus, we get perks.
Eu tirar conclusões para determinar qual console era melhor. Quando percebi que jogando em fps ps3 são reduzidos, e é feito para jogar, por que não os pasar.mientras xbox que isso não aconteça, as cores são mais nítidas e Xbox Live do que em o PS3 com HDMI. por isso, começar a pensar um pouco e depois dar a sua opinião. Devo esclarecer que não tenho ps3. Espero que você entenda que esta traduzido com google tradutor
Man EA Was ahead of time when the big developer was kinda hard to uttilize all the ps3 power and even make it worse to "just run" the game and then boom battlefield 3 coming the ps3 was superior than xbox 360 (even rockstar in 2011 still kinda hard to uttilizing all power of ps3 remember red dead redemption 1?)
The devs even said prior to BF3's release that they could accomplish more on the PS3 than the Xbox 360, and that the 360 restricted them from showing "their full potential" on consoles. The Xbox may shine here and there via multi-platform games, but that's due to laziness of the devs not putting work into PS3's complex-yet-strong cell processor. Looking at the exclusives for each console, the 360's don't even come close to that of the PS3. Uncharted bulldozes games like Gears and Halo.
Those are PC GPUs - I would imagine the ones on console to be different. Xbox has a 500MHz ATI Xenos(which is custom). PS3 has a RSX GPU at 550Mhz(also custom). By the looks of this video they perform almost the same, only the PS3 looks more dynamic because of the Blu-ray crap as I would imagine. Either way, both are out-dated and not meant to run a game that requires a whole 1GB video card.
LoL... I played crysis 2 on my old computer maxed out, and had 20 fps. After using fraps I realised that there were 20 fps. I thought it was 35-40. It depends. Some people are ok with 25-30 fps, others cant play with less than 45-50. I feel really good with 30 fps. But now I dont have to be cause I got a new Video Card. I also anjoy a Xbox Gamepad with my PC.
No doubt that Uncharted looks good, however you obviously haven't seen halo 4, Gears of war 3, now they are pretty games. I'm not saying they beat uncharted but they are on par. So saying "uncharted bulldozes games like gears and halo" means that ur ignorant and naive. Plus the two CPU's are so different in design that it's hard to determine which is more powerful. It's like apples and oranges.... u can't compare.
Complete nonsense. You look like you don't understand. GDDR 3 memory is both there and there. And the frequency of the ps3 is 550 mhz , the xbox 360 is 500 mhz. The GDDR 3 memory in the xbox 360 -512 is used in the GPU and CPU. The ps3 also has 512 MB of memory, but the GPU uses gddr3 and the central processor uses high-speed xdr dram.
ok, but at fps and graphics i am talking general in games. i played bo 2 in the ps3 of a friend and (we was 4) and fps was 10-15 and at xbox in the house of another friend that not happened
to be honest i dont give a shit if the ps3's graphics are just better because they have 3 more visible particles than xbox, as long as i have acceptable framerate i like it. and the playstation has free multiplayer whereas u have to be gold or silver xbox live member to play online multiplayer, however xbox takes advantage of smoother framerate and the best grip on their controllers, so i prefer xbox.
Man dice really did a great job with the ps3, all that time too get a game that gets a 30fps constant. FInally some reall justice.xbox is on its last pushes while developer are still pushing the ps3
That's a lie bro... That happens on the 360 and PC too. It's a result of bad game design and not the console or PC. That said, it doesn't happen often. How do I know this? I also have BO2 for 360 and PS3. Happened to me on both consoles. "we was 4 "You're 4? What are you doing on RUclips? What are you doing playing M rated/Peggi 18 games?
The 360 hasn't done that too me once, there have been 40 blocks of C4 and 2 tanks in the same spot before and the game ran a the same speed it always ran at. When I got a friend to try this on the Gaystation he said: AGGHHHH THIS JUST TURNED INTO BRICKFIELD3!!!!!! Also a techspert told me that the 360 is better for Battlefield and PS3 is better for CoD, which I am fine to agree with. He also told me that PS3 has everything it needs to be better than the 360, but it is like: Nah fuck that shit!
the cell processor is harder to design for. Sony admitted that the architecture they used wasn't as well made as they hoped. And I'm not that big of a fan of uncharted.. I got it with my ps3, didn't really like it. I find gears to be much more enjoyable
PS3 is better Xbox has frequent frame rate Drops to below 20fps Which is unplayable Imo.also it has lots of screen tearing.(more than the ps3) Ps3 more or less maintains a solid 30 fps.
Big fail for 360 at 0:15, look at the fence/blanket. Notable lack of texture on the door at 2:02 for the 360. Slightly more frame-rate drop for 360 (but not by much.) PS3 comes out on top, but the differences aren't really worth bragging about.
Lol, your are delusional, sitting up close to a monitor 30fps is nearly unplayable. Even when I play MOH warfighter, bf3, or Black ops 2 on my pc and my fps goes from 75 to 60 fps I can definitely tell the difference because the game is not as smooth and my aim isn't as fluid. Don't get me wrong, 60 fps is good way better than 30 fps but I always like to play higher for more fluid gameplay. Google 30fps vs 60 fps even Stevie Wonder can see the difference.
i hate to say it but ps3 is the better system im gonna go sell my x box now the mian reason for graphics the exclusives and the crappy coustmer service by by xbox you will always be rembered
Notice that the game barely dropped on both versions, even during the intense firefights in the second scene.
That is when console optimization comes into play. A PC game is re-formatted to run on a console with hardware restrictions by cutting AA, texture resolutions, etc. The graphics are pretty good on the console, considering how old they are(PS3 Cell and RSX began development in 2004, Xbox 360 Xenon/Xenos in 2005).
both run really good, not 60 fps but still really stable 30fps
4.38-5.16, Ps3 has 26-28 fps because it has more fog than 360
Yes, i agree
Guys actually I think it's good for a 10 years old consoles that they can stay at solid 30 fps I played a lot of bf3 on xbox 360 never been intrested in frame rates untill I got xbox one and noticed some in bf4 multiplayer but I always been satisfied with my experience on xbox 360
well i guess you where use to xbox 360 and didn't get anything or used anything better
I totally agree the last of us and GOW acension will even widen the graphics gap between ps3 and 360.
Why the ps3 side at 4:46 had smoke and mist effect but it was missing on xbox 360 side.
Does anyone know why my BF3 on Xbox 360 would skip frames sometimes. I only noticed it on campaign.
It depends whether you have 720p,1080p set in your settings!
I kinda feel like DICE should have removed the cap for campaign :/ ( Maybe they might have maintained it because of the screen tearing?)
In my ps3,the graphics are greart but the fps seems like 25-27
Mine stuck at 30 some say that the storage is cause of the problem
Well, every other "tech expert" would disagree. CoD for PS3 isn't as good as CoD for the 360 however, BF3 for PS3 is better than BF3 for the 360 since even DICE has said it (they added some more advanced graphical effects exclusively on the PS3). Also, i don't care what happened to your BF3 on your 360, the fact of the matter is that for everyone else on the 360, BF3 has the issues shown here. On the PS3 it isn't much better at all, but it still is still slightly better. Plus, we get perks.
Eu tirar conclusões para determinar qual console era melhor. Quando percebi que jogando em fps ps3 são reduzidos, e é feito para jogar, por que não os pasar.mientras xbox que isso não aconteça, as cores são mais nítidas e Xbox Live do que em o PS3 com HDMI. por isso, começar a pensar um pouco e depois dar a sua opinião. Devo esclarecer que não tenho ps3.
Espero que você entenda que esta traduzido com google tradutor
@@duckwombat Brazilian Portuguese, Spanish seems like a legal language, which country are you from? I'm 14 years old
@@desconhecidov4119 From Argentina!
CONCLUSION: Both consoles are pretty much identical BUT PS3 has better visuals, Xbox 360 has better framerate.
You are a genius... my God you just sayed everything that happens to PS3
it will look a thousand times better and have the refresh rate of your tv and will be maxed out graphics if u pay up a little for your pc.
man, someone should compare console 1080p (which isn't really 1080p) framerate to pc ultra 1440p. Let's see the fps and quality difference
Does turning Anti-Aliasing off affect performance? I couldn't tell any difference myself.
On console you cannot deactivate it lol
@@bigbadanimation9130 no, you cant
meanwhile cod 60 fps in old gen...
+Frog Stat
well it doesnt really drop under 50 on both so...
is it Worth to buy bf3 when i have bf4 premium on ps3? (some lagging in bf4)
And more and more and more and more and more stupid arguments on the PC vs. Console wars.....WHO CARES! PLAY YOUR BLOODY GAMES!
Was this before or after you had to install the HD pack on the 360 :P
Before
@@calmdalm oh... good to know
Man EA Was ahead of time
when the big developer was kinda hard to uttilize all the ps3 power
and even make it worse to "just run" the game
and then boom battlefield 3 coming
the ps3 was superior than xbox 360
(even rockstar in 2011 still kinda hard to uttilizing all power of ps3 remember red dead redemption 1?)
The devs even said prior to BF3's release that they could accomplish more on the PS3 than the Xbox 360, and that the 360 restricted them from showing "their full potential" on consoles. The Xbox may shine here and there via multi-platform games, but that's due to laziness of the devs not putting work into PS3's complex-yet-strong cell processor. Looking at the exclusives for each console, the 360's don't even come close to that of the PS3. Uncharted bulldozes games like Gears and Halo.
Exactly bro, They make the game for xbox 360 and they translate it for other consoles.
on my pc sometimes I strugle in 40 fps and i think it looks horrible but this is pathetic
so? if you have a 560ti clocked at 1000mhz than it wont be faster than a 660ti clocked at 990mhz
The screen tear on 360 , oh my god ......
really depends on the game too. Try playing MK on less than 60 FPS and tell me there's no difference.
Yeah, I can't play this again. 30fps on xbox one today. BF4 is silky smooth 60fps! sigh.
Only 30 FPS? So is there noticeable lag on this game?
I think it would run at a good 45 FPS if it wasn't locked at 30.
i noticed multiplayer is smoother on xbox 360
You're telling me this because? Besides, your GM's PC could be a gaming computer.
Do do you test them
Please test this game without anti aliasing
One difference! I can fit my game on one disc. :3
we was 4 guys playing
Best running game on a console :D
@Livioz95 no i have that problem... i was getting like 23fps today when i was looking in the middle of the map
Those are PC GPUs - I would imagine the ones on console to be different. Xbox has a 500MHz ATI Xenos(which is custom). PS3 has a RSX GPU at 550Mhz(also custom). By the looks of this video they perform almost the same, only the PS3 looks more dynamic because of the Blu-ray crap as I would imagine. Either way, both are out-dated and not meant to run a game that requires a whole 1GB video card.
LoL... I played crysis 2 on my old computer maxed out, and had 20 fps. After using fraps I realised that there were 20 fps. I thought it was 35-40. It depends. Some people are ok with 25-30 fps, others cant play with less than 45-50. I feel really good with 30 fps. But now I dont have to be cause I got a new Video Card. I also anjoy a Xbox Gamepad with my PC.
On my PS3 why do I have bad frame rate and graphics?
because of cell processasor and the lack of ram
No doubt that Uncharted looks good, however you obviously haven't seen halo 4, Gears of war 3, now they are pretty games. I'm not saying they beat uncharted but they are on par. So saying "uncharted bulldozes games like gears and halo" means that ur ignorant and naive. Plus the two CPU's are so different in design that it's hard to determine which is more powerful. It's like apples and oranges.... u can't compare.
The gpu in the ps3 is actually a lot slower, the difference in performance comes entirely from the cell processor.
Complete nonsense. You look like you don't understand. GDDR 3 memory is both there and there. And the frequency of the ps3 is 550 mhz , the xbox 360 is 500 mhz. The GDDR 3 memory in the xbox 360 -512 is used in the GPU and CPU. The ps3 also has 512 MB of memory, but the GPU uses gddr3 and the central processor uses high-speed xdr dram.
i guess its locked at 30fps
is this with or without the anti aliasing option turned on?
it's on consoles so most likely off
what resolution does the consoles are at ? 711p ?
The should be played at 60 fps. 30 fps is for most console racing games...idk why they downgraded fps with shooters too.
In this future, it does...
no smoke visible on xbox
No, they're pretty similar.
Look at PS3 in MOH 2010 multiplayer and it's only frostbite 1.5. At least the 360 can hold off frostbite 2. And BTW, PS3s have freezing issues in BF3.
just one question does u ppls xbox supports full RGB and Bioshock infinite is enough to explain the difference between two haha
i hate how people say that ps3 or xbox 360 is batter just because they own one of them
bottom line is pc is batter end of story
They both look good but as with most ps3 games the screen tearing is more evident
On the ps3
ok, but at fps and graphics i am talking general in games.
i played bo 2 in the ps3 of a friend and (we was 4) and fps was 10-15
and at xbox in the house of another friend that not happened
It is the other way around bro.
I just came here to look at the game that made me switch over to PC. This game was terrible on console
to be honest i dont give a shit if the ps3's graphics are just better because they have 3 more visible particles than xbox, as long as i have acceptable framerate i like it. and the playstation has free multiplayer whereas u have to be gold or silver xbox live member to play online multiplayer, however xbox takes advantage of smoother framerate and the best grip on their controllers, so i prefer xbox.
does frame rate lower when filming on consoles?
@Hfajardo97 this game is better on xbox, no input lag :)
ps3 seems to have more affects like smoke 4:25
I hate platform warfare.
are you talking about pc? no xbox 360 and ps3 can run any games with unlimited fps.
Actually, no it isn't.
Xbox 360 más potente que PS3
Man dice really did a great job with the ps3, all that time too get a game that gets a 30fps constant. FInally some reall justice.xbox is on its last pushes while developer are still pushing the ps3
HE THINKS XBOX WAS ABOUT TO DIE 7 YEARS AGO 🤭🤭😂😂😂😂😂
Xbox is better than ps3 at almoste very multi-platform games
That's a lie bro...
That happens on the 360 and PC too.
It's a result of bad game design and not the console or PC.
That said, it doesn't happen often.
How do I know this?
I also have BO2 for 360 and PS3.
Happened to me on both consoles.
"we was 4
"You're 4? What are you doing on RUclips? What are you doing playing M rated/Peggi 18 games?
The 360 hasn't done that too me once, there have been 40 blocks of C4 and 2 tanks in the same spot before and the game ran a the same speed it always ran at.
When I got a friend to try this on the Gaystation he said: AGGHHHH THIS JUST TURNED INTO BRICKFIELD3!!!!!!
Also a techspert told me that the 360 is better for Battlefield and PS3 is better for CoD, which I am fine to agree with.
He also told me that PS3 has everything it needs to be better than the 360, but it is like: Nah fuck that shit!
I must need new glasses or something because they both look the fucking same to me. There's a huge noticeable difference on PC though.
The single player mode runs really good on console for the graphics but multiplayer is just shitlol
the cell processor is harder to design for. Sony admitted that the architecture they used wasn't as well made as they hoped. And I'm not that big of a fan of uncharted.. I got it with my ps3, didn't really like it. I find gears to be much more enjoyable
PS3 is better
Xbox has frequent frame rate Drops to below 20fps
Which is unplayable Imo.also it has lots of screen tearing.(more than the ps3)
Ps3 more or less maintains a solid 30 fps.
+Xx__SHADOW__xX ikr
I play the xbox 360 and I agree with what most is saying about the ps3
I have this game for PS3 and 360.
PS3 graphics and performance is better in comparison.
But for the graphics this runs the best just look at crysis 3
Big fail for 360 at 0:15, look at the fence/blanket.
Notable lack of texture on the door at 2:02 for the 360.
Slightly more frame-rate drop for 360 (but not by much.)
PS3 comes out on top, but the differences aren't really worth bragging about.
Same with GoW and Halo
up date. THE PS3 absolutley muders Xbox in performance.
They run the same and look the same.
im still glad i traded the 360 version for the ps3 version because the ps3 has so much less screen tear that was always a problem on xbox
I'm just glad I got it for $20 on PC with all its DLC
GHOST117HALOBOYCOD It's really a beautiful game on all platforms.
I can't find video like this but on gulf of oman
Dude you wouldn't believe how many PCs can't run Minecraft.
not gonna lie game looks horrible on the big screen
im trying to say that any computer caN RUN MC
Halo 4 looks as good if not better
My pc isnt very good, and I tried playing online. At 5 fps.
yea 360 version has sharper graphics and better fps but ps3 has particles and shit
I guess 30fps is not bad but when you switch it 60fps it's epic.
thats why u get a pc
My pc gets 55-60fps on Ultra.
Lol, your are delusional, sitting up close to a monitor 30fps is nearly unplayable. Even when I play MOH warfighter, bf3, or Black ops 2 on my pc and my fps goes from 75 to 60 fps I can definitely tell the difference because the game is not as smooth and my aim isn't as fluid. Don't get me wrong, 60 fps is good way better than 30 fps but I always like to play higher for more fluid gameplay. Google 30fps vs 60 fps even Stevie Wonder can see the difference.
what about tearing????ps3 wins
Ps3 is clearly much better
look at the fps numbers ps3 is better
Well Bf3 is totally fucked up after the aftermath patch! Getting low fps on every map. Quit playing it now. (PS3) dont know how it is on Xbox.
i hate to say it but ps3 is the better system im gonna go sell my x box now the mian reason for graphics the exclusives and the crappy coustmer service by by xbox you will always be rembered
PC-i3 com AMD fraca roda com graficos melhores a 60fps '-'