Great job but you're missing some crucial points, 1. The reason why Hazrat Ali refused to bring justice to Uthman's killers was because the killers were too large in number and H.Ali wasn't ready to punish the large number of people without the proper facts and records so that no innocent is punished 2. Muaviya was wrong to oppose H.Ali. It was clear he only wanted his clan, Ummayads, to rule. Uthman was also wrong to put too many rulers from his own family - clearly the Ummayads wanted domination in the Muslim empire. Without Muaviya's alliegance Hazrat Ali was scared his rule would be weakened and would cause problems similar to those that happened to Uthman. 3. Hazrat Hassan did not refuse to fight because of a weak army. He was the grandson of Holy Prophet and would put up a great opposition but he refused since he didn't want any bloodshed 4. Imam Hussain did not only refuse allegiance to Yazeed because he broke the treaty but also because he was a person straying away from Islam, he would gamble, drink wine and commit sins hence Imam Hussain wasn't ready to hand over the Muslim empire to someone filled with falsehood. 4. The people of Kufa were at the side of Imam Hussain, however, after the Imam received letters of support Yazeed placed a very strict anti-Hussain ruler who would kill/torture anyone who took the Imams side hence everyone backed out
Don't say hazrat hassan (a.s) couldn't fight coz of weak army,actually he was grandson of prophet who was never in favour of human bloodshed for power,so he went for peace treaty coz of his best training by prophet, where love of power never exists.hassan and hussain were embodiment of love and sacrifices. They n their father never loved power n control. They just loved humanity.
Exactly hazrat ali a.s is known as shere khuda why would he be afraid of anyone...... He won the battle of khyber with very few army members....... Just he wanted peace that's he didn't want any battle
@@shabimirza2497 Hazrat Ali (RA) was so brave and his faith in Allah was so firm that he would be happy to give his life fighting in the way of Allah. They don't have much knowledge in this field.
Facts on Yazid that was missed in the video- 1) Yazid was the son of Muoweya 2) Yazid was not a great human, let alone be the leader. He was Evil. 3) He sent an Army of 30,000 to kill Imam Hussain, his family and companions whom altogether were 72 people. By these figures, clearly he was a psycho. Imam Hussain stood up against oppression, he was betrayed by the Kufa people whom said they were with him but disappeared after the threats of Yazid. Karbala is not a forgettable event. It consists of sacrifice, courage, bravery, leadership, family, true companionship, fight against oppression, fight for freedom, fight for what is right against the wrong. He was from the blood of Prophet Muhammad, yet he was brutelly murdered and then you have some people who say they are Muslim, yet overlook this event.
Yazeed sent total 18 people from Syria to control Kufa and remaining army belonged to Kufa. The same very people who invited Hussain a.s to Kufa they broke the pledge they have made with Muslim bin Aqeel and left those 72 in Karbala.
Tbh I have never liked Muawiyya and Umayyad Caliphate, even If I'm a Sunni. The heck were they thinking killing off Muhammad's family like that? I would like to hear about the Shia version really, as this video is hardly balanced, maybe the division isn't as bad as it seems and finally we can at least say hello without going to each other's throat.
Well just look into history and you will discover that Yazid and Muawiyya weren't even practicing Muslims by any means, for example Yazid used to drink. They just wanted the power at that time in history, for them it wasn't about islam at all. While Hassan and Husayn couldn't accept that the religion which their grandfather(!) brought was treated like that, they had no option but going to war with Muawiyya and Yazid.
Kevin Kameswara what do you want to know about the Shia version? That they been oppressed by most” Muslim people” at the time? That no one actually listened to what the prophet had to say? That no one followed the Quran when it said” I ask nothing of you but love for my kin” yet the same person you say RA yo fought against the blood of the prophet.
Ali was killed by the same people who killed Uthman. So that wasn't the Sunni's, Hassan died and they claim it was no poison with no proof. And Husayn was killed right in front of those same Shia who claimed they would help him. Anyways none of that matters, what matters is what's the true Islam. And Shia accuse the majority of the companions of being hypocrites including Uthman RA who was incharge of the complete version of the Quran we read today and Umar RA and Aisha RA and Ibn Umar and Abu Huraira who gave is a lot of hadith
Omar Omar so your saying the same people that killed uthman killed Ali? Than why did aisha fight against Ali? Than muawiya fought against Ali and than the khawarj. Uthman didn’t gather the Quran, it was in his time, doesn’t mean he wrote it or gathered any of it. And abu hurrara came to Islam 3 years prior to the death of the prophet yet he has over 5000 Hadiths.
@@mmsaf17 ماشالله Abu Huraira after narrated hadith doesn't disprove anything first off, secondly the same rebels who killed Uthman in order to get Ali into power killed Ali RA because he decided to sign a peace treaty with Muawiyah. That's just proven history. Lastly in the Quran it says Allah was pleased with the Muhajiroon and Ansar so you'll have to bring me a clear verse saying they were bad or only to follow the Family of the Prophet for me to give an ear to anything the Shia have to say
Us sunnis believe that what happened there was a tradegy and awful HOWEVER the shias equate the grandchildren to the Prophet and to other prophets mentioned in the Quran. It's amazing how they divided Islam over a political situation
Last name First name well if it wasn’t for your mate muawiya this divide wouldn’t have happened so if you wanna blame someone for this divide it should be muawiya. He’s the reason this tragedy happened and you sunnis love him. Which proves that you don’t care about what happened nor do you think it’s a tragedy. I can see through your bull$h’t dude.
@@8achim936 the reason the divide happened is because Shias can't move on from that tradegy. We don't even mourn the Prophet's death the way you mourn the deaths of ordinary human beings that had no prophetic. Muawiya and Ali's hate was nothing more than a poltical situation. Muawiya himself wasn't a good Muslim and no sunnis regard him as The perfect example of a true Muslim however that doesn't change the fact that Ali (RA) and muawiya had issues regarding policies which is a political situation. The reason Islam is currently divided is because Shia's can't accept that a tradgrh occurred to the leader of a POLITICAL party and treat Ali (RA) as if he was a Prophet himself which is wrong. Was Ali (RA) a great man ? Yes! Was what happened to his children a tradegy? Yes but should we continue to argue about a political situation that occurred so long ago? No. Sunnis respect all the caliphs of Islam but do not give them more importance than the other Prophets mentioned in the Quran nor do they think the Caliphs were on equal footing with the Prophet himself or the Prophet's that came before him as The Quran itself mentions the Prophet and other prophets but makes no mention of any of the Caliphs. After the Prophet, everyone else was a human no different than me and you. Again what Yazeed did was awful and unforgivable but again to continue to mourn so heavily for the grandsons and to call on their names for help is insane. They were political parties/opponents and was no different than a president being assassinated. Would you mourn a president you really liked and thought was a great man thousands of years after his assassination and then call his name for help ? It's once again illogical what shias do especially in Islam where you can't ask for anyone's help besides the All Mighty. The Holy Prophet himself didn't want statues or pictures of himself so people didn't pray or call his name instead of the name of God yet shias completely ignore this and call for Hussein/Hassan and Ali (RA).
@@lastnamefirstname4678 Us Shias understand only Allah (God) is Caretaker of all, and us shias ONLY call for help from Almighty Allah. We call for 'Ya Husain, Ya Ali, Ya Hasan because Muhammed PBUH's own heart was with these 3 amazing men. Ali (R) was his beloved nephew (blood relative), Hasan (R) was his beloved grandson and Hussain (R) was the younger grandson. These 2 grandsons literally grew up on the shoulders of Prophet Muhammed PBUH; playing and laughing. In your mind imagine this, If our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH witnessed with his own eyes the assassinations of Ali (R), Hasan (R) and Hussain (R) and rest of their family, he would mourn their deaths with the heaviest heart, he would beat himself crying until the pain would be too much and he would be calling on them Ya Ali Ya Hasan Ya Hussain all night, for nights to come. When you look at what the shias do during Muharram, it is the exact same behavior of crying, feeling the pain of the survivors of Karbala and calling the names of those 3 honorable men. Shias feel the pain of our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH, and they feel it DEEPLY. That's where the difference is where I find that shias are the True followers. True because Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself would take a month (that's what Muharram is) to mourn the deaths of his family members, just like shias do today. It's important to know that shias are intuitively and emotionally more connected to our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself and his beloved family. A lot more than the sunnis'. It's important because Islam itself is an intuitive religion, as well as a political one and has many attributes, just like how Allah (swt) has attributes, and that's why Islam a successful religion, and will continue to be. The so called shias that call for help to other than Allah (swt), don't actually understand Islam as a whole themselves. Islam is a beautiful religion. I'm grateful to have Islam chosen me. And I chose it back. Alhamdulillah. :)
@@zainnaqvi23 That's not true at all. Islam forbids calling out anyone's name for help and even against excessive mourning. Islam also forbids causing harm to yourself like how shia's routinely do during Muharam. Your claim of if the Prophet (pbuh) saw what happened to his grandchildren he would do the same things shias currently do is wrong as evident by what the Prophet (pbuh) did during the year of tradegy. The Prophet never resulted to beating himself or crying excessively for his wife or his uncle whom he loved greatly. Once again you should give more charity or hand out food during the months of muharam as it was a tradegy however Shia's do things that are not permissible in Islam as evident by how the Prophet(pbuh) mourned during his life time. Also shia's place the grandchildren and Ali (RA) in equal footing with the other Prophets of Islam. We don't even mourn Prophet Isa after he was hung on a cross which was equally as horrible as an example
This Video (including part 1 and 2) was so amazingly simple and clear about the difference of Shia and Sunni.. Thanks for the time and efforts you brought to bring this to people.. I dont feel there is any difference about being called as Shia and Sunni, except some political difference and situation that demanded separation on group of people. Because I feel Shia and Sunni still stand on same faith of One Allah and Prophet Mohammed. And rest is just opinion who should have been caliphate, which should not separate us different as Muslims.
untill that point we were ONE entity but later on some people tried to rewrite Islam like reprogramming the System so they get the outcome they wanted...and for this reason the original Programm needed to be erased...which is the reason that all of the Imams ended in rather tragic Situations...if you want to know more go google it an you will see how the "Caliphs" rewrote islam
Thank you. Your videos have helped many many around the world. Also in Afghanistan. My math skills are mastered by Khan Academy, and has been very useful since.
Hadrat Ali (AS) never attacked first. He send messengers with a gift of The Holy Quran and it was the other side that murdered the messengers. After that Hadrat Ali (AS) had to confront the them.
I don't think so. None of the two sides wanted to fight because both sides had companions of the prophet and they only wanted to solve the issue. It was some people (regardless of what side) who disobeyed the orders and attacked first. It's not clear who they were and some even say they might have been from the same group who killed Uthman.
@@fatimafatima3283 prophet s.a.w ali is the eternal complete Quran and eman.. We are just following what ali taught Hussain a.s, what Hussain a.s taught his son zain ul abideen a.s...
@WhiteHair Rules sunni = following the sunna of mohamed , my advice to all of you is to learn arabic before doing any kind of debate between shia and sunni , just be muslim and follow most importantly quran ( and of course in second place authentic hadith )
One important point you're missing about Hassan-Muawiya treaty is that the Islamic Prophet PBUH had prophecized about this in an earlier Hadith. It is written in the most authentic Hadith books of the Sunni's. "This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him." Reference: Volume 3, Book 49, Number 867
It's amazing to me that people are still fighting battles that began centuries ago. It keeps going in circles even though we all have the ability to stop the momentum and realize that there is only now.
Alhamdulillah, I am a Muslim inclined to the Sunni understanding of Islam, but I love and wish the best for all Muslims, I believe we can forget what happened among the companions of the prophet Muhammad SAW and rather follow the Quran and authentic narrations from the prophet Muhammad SAW. I believe they shall account for what they did and we shall not be questioned of what they did so why fret and say things about these people when we should rather be worried about ourselves.
Perfectly agree. Do you know why there is a satan sho misleads people and people have no knowledge they are just becoming like Hawarijs who killed Ali ra because their lack of knowledge even if they were too pious they were stupid in the sense that they did not get knowledge. Lets obey Allah and His messenger. Assalamu alaykum wa rohmatullohi wa barokatuh
If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt All these are deviant fabrications. Ali (r) never repelled during the period of the first caliphas. He was, neither the AHLUL bayt were power quran.Shias are stupid, in bringing this topic to the surface again n again. I hope this will not continue until judgement day.
SUNNI ARE SUCH LIEING JEWS EVEN THOSE ARABS AT THE TIME OF PROPHET MUHHAMAD WERE ALL KAFIRS AND JUST THE SAME AS SOME CHRISTIANS WHO GO AGAINST JESUS IS THE SAME WITH THESE SUNNIS THERE JUST BELIEVING IN JEW IEDOLOGY THAT SOME MESSIAH WILL COME AND WIPE OUT THE NON BELIEVERS... THESE SUNNI ARE SUCH FAKE MUSLIMS ITS SO FUNNY THAT WHEN THEY GET EXPOSED THERE LIKE YEAH WERE ALL MUSLIM BUT IN OTHER VIDS THESE SAME PPL GOING AROUND SAYING SHIA IS FAKE BUNCH OF INTERNETTROLLS
You also forgot to mention that Yazid was Muawiya's (RA) son. But that's understood I guess. You are doing a tremendous job explaining such a complex and difficult issue in such a lucid and compact manner. Never thought it was possible. Of course the nuances are missed but for an overview of the issue (including some of the nuances) this is a brilliant effort. p.s you have actually captured a fair bit of the nuances. Which makes it even more brilliant.
shiajew - yes Muwaiyah Radiyallahu anhu, family with Prophet peace & blessings be on him, shia jews both worship Hussain RAdiayllahu anhu and led to his death you hypocrite not Sunnis. shias have names like Abdul Hussain, shirk is in the name! similar to the romans and jews who led to so called death of Jesus Alehas Salam and prayed to him.
When you read your books you will know that the liars are you, There is a huge difference between the religion of Muawiya and the people of Sakifa and the religion of Muhammad and Al Muhammad...
@Jim smith you do realise he was the enemy of Ali and Hassan, and his father Sufwan was enemy of the prophet SAWS and his son was the enemy of hussain...
Left the part where Kufa people wrote thousands of letters to Hazrat Husnain (RA) and then betrayed him. Not a single person came to defend him. They even caught and gave his close friend Hazrat Muslim (RA) to yazid, who beheaded him.
I don't understand, this divide between Shia and Sunni Muslims. Sunni Muslims also see the 'battle of Karbala' as a significant event in Muslim history. What happened after that? What side does Sunni Muslims take? Can you please discuss if you know about it?
Nadeem Shaikh they basically say that it’s a big event but it happens and we should not hype it even tho they are the grandparent of the prophet. Btw the father of yazid is holy according to Sunnis so that doesn’t make sense. After the killing of Hussein we have The continuation of the 12 imams and the majority of them did also get oppressed and killed. But the Sunnis doesn’t acknowledge them.
Nadeem Shaikh The Sunnis say he was holy because he has meet the prophet but Shia says he is not holy because why should someone go to heaven just because they meet the prophet, they say that it’s unfair that someone goes to heaven only because they lived in a certain time and in a certain place. He is also considered bad for Shia because he fought Ali and probably killed hasan (Ali’s son)
@@jafaral-badri8005 Yeah, I really agree with Shia Muslims on this, why should anyone be considered holy just because he had met our Nabi (pbuh)?! But, only Allah knows what would happen. Btw, why didn't Hazrat Ali (raz) gave more attention in finding out who killed Hazrat Uthman (raz)? And, how was their relation? Do people consider Hazrat Ali (raz) to have some connection in Hazrat Uthaman (raz)' assassination?
We have to follow Quran and sunnah rather than sunni and Shia....as Quran says we are muslims.....and we should follow Allah and his messenger & prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)
Abdul KrEeM Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of Allah (S) stood to give us a speech beside a pond which is known as Khum (Ghadir Khum) which is located between Mecca and Medina. Then he praised Allah and reminded Him, and then said: "O’ people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by Allah) and I shall answer that call. Behold! I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is the book of Allah in which there is light and guidance...The other one is my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. (three times)." Sunni Reference: • Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of ‘Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v 4, p1873, Tradition #36. The Messenger of Allah (S) said: "I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols that if you adhere to BOTH of them you shall not go astray after me. They are, the Book of Allah, and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt. The Merciful has informed me that These two shall not separate from each other till they come to me by the Pool (of Paradise)." Sunni references: 1. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 662-663,328, report of 30+ companions, with reference to several chains of transmitters. 2. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, Chapter of "Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, pp 109,110,148,533 who wrote this tradition is authentic (Sahih) based on the criteria of the two Shaikhs (al-Bukhari and Muslim). 3. Sunan, by Daarami, v2, p432 4. Musnad, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, pp 14,17,26,59, v4, pp 366,370-372, v5, pp 182,189,350,366,419 5. Fadha’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p585, Tradition #990 6. al-Khasa’is, by al-Nisa’i, pp 21,30 7. al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p230 8. al-Kabir, by al-Tabarani, v3, pp 62-63,137 9. Kanz al-Ummal, by al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Chapter al-Iti’sam bi Habl Allah, v1, p44. 10. Tafsir Ibn Kathir (complete version), v4, p113, under commentary of verse 42:23 of Qur’an (four traditions) 11. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, by Ibn Sa’d, v2, p194, Pub. by Dar Isadder, Lebanon. 12. al-Jami’ al-Saghir, by al-Suyuti, v1, p353, and also in v2 13. Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haythami, v9, p163 14. al-Fateh al-Kabir, al-Binhani, v1, p451 15. Usdul Ghabah fi Ma’rifat al-Sahaba, Ibn al-Athir, v2, p12 16. Jami’ al-Usul, Ibn al-Athir, v1, p187 17. History of Ibn Asakir, v5, p436 18. al-Taj al-Jami’ Lil Usul, v3, p308 19. al-Durr al-Manthoor, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v2, p60 20. Yanabi al-Mawaddah, al-Qundoozi al-Hanafi, pp 38,183 21. Abaqat al-Anwar, v1, p16
All shia follow the Holy prophet but does it not make sense that his family should continue the caliphate. And how can you ignore that yazid killed the Holy prophets grandson. Surely that is a time to mourn. Even if you dont mourn you have to acknowledge that this event was a tragedy. As a shia we always believe in the prophet first but we have to have respect and following imam ali. We ow the difference between an Imaam and a Prophet
@@saminagulzar8622 Yes i acknowledge that this event was a tragedy but that doesn't means we should mourn....if mourning is the best solution for this tragedy then show me any authentic hadees so that we could rectify ourselves...
@@anonymous05222 do you need a hadees to show you how to mourn. To feel sadness when a family member or a friend dies. What is you natural feeling. What is your natural instinct. And then think without any thought our Holy Prophet Mohamamd (SAW) his daughters son ..his grandson and family were killed. How can anyone not feel sadness for that. My cat had 2 kittens that died and I cried for 2 days. And felt so upset when I saw her my cat and even she cried ..she meowed for 2 days for her babies.. If you mean why do shia have majalis and mourn. Then the simple answer to that is to remember that imam Hussain sacrificed himself for islam. We dont believe that he or imam Ali were Prophets. The Rasul was the last Prophet. We all believe that.
@@saminagulzar8622 I don't want any hadees for how to mourn....but i want answer why u people mourn like ********.....and u know there is a authentic hadees which says if a member of a family dies then u should mourn only for 3 days except wife.....and u people mourn for couple of months.....
Interesting introduction. I hope no flame wars erupt here, and amicable discussions are abound, but I always wonder: how many narratives of the same event exist that we can readily study, and how often do they conflict with each other? Nonetheless, ignorance of facts is rarely bliss in a discussion, and I am glad that I feel inspired to learn a bit more then what I assumed I would have already learnt before. Thanks Khan Academy for diversifying to such interesting topics!
This was an introduction for me to the shia/sunni difference. I'm thinking one thing though. What would Mohammed think if he knew all his children and grandchildren would be murdered over his legacy by his followers within 50 years of his death?
@@shakeerhussain9366 was that maybe why he named somebody not of his own bloodline as his successor? To prevent the prophecy from coming out? Although it had exactly that effect?
Muhammad weeped by hearing the event of karbala by jibrail.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt does it matter what the 3 caliphs did ? At the end of the day none of them were prophets and none were perfect. The 3 caliphs expanded Islam and contributed greatly to the religion. Were they perfect? No. The whole shia divide is over a political statement. Shia's equate the Prophet' grandchildren to the other Prophets mentioned in the Quran. What happened to them was a tradegy but they weren't Prophets HOWEVER shias treat them as such
Ya Allah ... LA ILAHA ILLALLAH MUHAMMAD RASOOLULLAH. THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH MUHAMMAD IS HIS RASOOL. LA HAULA WALA KUWWATA ILLA BILLA. NO ONE HAS THE POWER OVER ANYTHING ACCEPT ALLAH.. ALLAH SE MAANGO OR KISISE NAHI..
Here we go! If one read this flowchart honestly he would get to know our(shia's) 6th leader is Imam Jaffar Sadiq (who was teacher of imam bukhari and Jaber the chemistry's father) , their 6th leader is yazeed.
Make sense..if i choose to follow the tragedies in Islam, there must be many more tradition exist. My opinion is, the tragedy must be remembered as reminder, how costly the fight to Islam unity & brotherhood. I must say that i will take it as lesson that Islam community must unite. The problem is when the followers is become extreme to follow certain leaders. Leadership is not inherited. Anybody may have this character. There should be only type of Muslim, as Muslim must follow the same teaching from Prophet Muhammad SAW (peace be upon him)
in the event of ghadeer khumm, the prophet SAWS said that after him they should on to 2 weighty ropes which is 1) the Quran and 2) the ahlul bayt. u should be able to find this in sahih muslim, its called hadith al thaqulayn (i dont think i spelt it right). ahlul bayt are of 14 members which are the prophet himself, his daughter fatima and the 12 imams.
So Glad I Stumbled Upon This Great-Chanel... I've Been Going Thru Videos For 8 Hours Straight Thus-Far... ..&.. I When One Makes Learning a Fun.&.Entertaining Undertaking... ..``Edutainment/Entercation´´..!! 👌👌💯
My mother is shia and my father Sunni, each of them wanted me to become „one of them“. I did not want them to argue over me so I told them I don’t want to do anything with islam. But at some point Allah SWT guided me to the right path alhamdulilah so I had to check both sides. I have to admit that for me the shia side has a lot of logical flaws which I will state here. Also I had the feeling that they pick verses out of context and interpret them as they like. Maybe some shia brother can answer my questions. 1) Shias are interpreting riba as usary and not interest. So it is halal to take and give interest. This is the number one reasons why I could not become shia. There is no doubt that interest is the cause of all economical problems (even if interest is only 1%). You can check this out everywhere, it is FACT! Gods economic system is zakat! The best form of tax. So if a believe has one mistake, I can’t believe that it comes from god. Sunnis reject any form of interest 2) Khums: Shias say you have to pay 1/5th of your yearly income as a form of tax. To me this is flawed exactly like our current system and stands in contrast to zakat! I don’t know any shia who is paying the khums. The Quran says it won’t make us do something which is too hard for us to do. The Sunni view is that khums is only for war times. The surah in the quran where khums is mentioned is clearly talking about war times and no where else in the Quran is khums mentioned! 3) Marriage just for a period of time Go to the father and mother of a shia girl and ask them if they are alright with marrying their daughter for a set period. Again most of them don’t like it. 4) I don’t believe our prophet peace be upon him chose Ali as the second caliph. The reason for my opinion is that if he would have done so, every Muslim leader in the future would have put his son as his successor. Making the caliphate a kingship. We all want to follow the prophet and this would have been the best excuse. We condemn Muawiya for putting Yazid as his successor instead voting, but with appointing Ali as the second caliph we would have given him the perfect justification to do so! The way the first 4 caliphs were chosen/voted is a perfect for of democracy. Let the most knowledgeable and god fearing/ most suited be caliph. If Allah SWT wanted he would have given our prophet peace be upon him sons himself. 5) Shias accusing Abu Bakr/ Omar for stealing the title of the caliphate doesn’t make sense to me too. Abu Bakr gave up all his wealth and risked his life for the prophet peace be upon him, so why on earth would he risk to go into hell fire by disobeying the order of the prophet? Same goes for Omar 6) Why would Ali give his daughter to Omar as a wife when he stole the title of caliph from him? 7) Why are the other imams all from the lineage of Husayn and not Hassan? Is it because he gave the title of caliph to Muawiya? 8) Are Shias believing that a caliph/Imam has to be someone without sin and of the family of the prophet? What happens if all the successors die and none is left? These are some of my thoughts in regards to the shia view while researching myself. I couldn’t find anything contradicting in the Sunni view. My objection here is not to offend anyone, just sharing my own experience.
these are things that have bothered me for quite a while. I feel that neither the shia nor the sunni's are totally correct but they each have things that are true that the other side doesn't have. for example, in Bukhari it states that the Prophet used to sometimes join his salat (zuhr + asr, magrib + isha) without any sickness, travel or need. The Shia do this ALL the time but the sunni's are against it. But thats not what the Prophet did. The Shia also don't pray tarawih, but according to sunni sources the Prophet discouraged the gathering of musali's during Ramadan after Isha as it would likely become a burden on the Ummah. I feel the Shia belief more accurately reflects the practice and teaching of the Prophet in this regard, more so than the sunni's. There are other things also, but for the shia, they pray on clay stones. The prophet and his companions didn't do this so this is a CLEAR innnovation. The sunni's call the Azan correctly and the Shia have added to the azan what wasn't present during the life of the Prophet. So as I said before, I feel the truth lies somewhere in the middle and neither side is 100% correct.
lol injecting democracy was good the thing is who choose those voters to vote? :))) have a trip to QOM city in IRAN and figure these things out i know they have some discussion centers there and some people who know shia the best if u have any question
@@KingKong-me1pk go away and if you believe evil with all its instruments will triumph, you are on the losing side. G-d is Good and is the G-d of the Good, not of the wicked and those who serve it.
wrote a long passage but then deleted it. you have to open some books and read it yourself also you will have to read the same incident narrations from different scholars/historian to figure it out. What all 8 points I see above only shows that you have read too less and your opinion is easily swayed by other's advices instead of focusing on facts.As for the 4th point tell me can a strong wealthy man not buy votes in democracy. It even happens in present time. The caliphate was much more than being just the leader of land and army which people don't understand.
Hazrat ali didn't give any daughter to umar.. Don't blame brother.. I advise all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth. Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death??? Shia is actual and accurate islam..
if you want to stop divide, learn what shiasm truely is with out taqiyah, shiasm is a jewish made faith by ibn saba who said Ali is god and started wars, similar to how crypto jew paul said JEsus is god & started wars!
Yet again Shiite information is false or is wrongly interpreted, quite possibly because it is taken from non-shias. Would you learn about the Catholic faith from a Protestant or a Catholic? Please read books such as Nahjul Balagha, which is a compilation of the letters and sermons of Imam Ali. It gives a lot of historical context necessary to understand the complicated era.
timtima19 Although I highly appreciate teachings and sayings of Imam Ali, much of today's shia doctrine is İranian Propaganda against Arabs/Sunnis. İranians have made Gods out of Humans, and they worship Ahlu-Bayt like idol worshipers. True Shias of Imam are Sunnis.
if you want to stop divide, learn what shiasm truely is with out taqiyah, shiasm is a jewish made faith by ibn saba who said Ali is god and started wars, similar to how crypto jew paul said JEsus is god & started wars!
You see what happened by not chosing Ali ( the rightly guided) as true first calif .....This anarchy rose up because when Holy Prophet SAWW died and the people who only want to be kings or califs chose themselves as kalifs before last ceremony of Holy Prophet in a meeting when Ali was preparing for the last ceremony of Holy Prophet.
A lot of people in the comment are whining about "this is historically inaccurate, you should have studied the Sunni" while he has stated multiple times that THIS IS ACCORDING TO SHIA TRADITION!!! At the end of the day, he doesn't care to spread a religious message, but to talk about the history from a point of view not many people know about.
With all due respect, Sir. You’re missing a lot. Please research more. There’s more than just the “Ghadeer Khum” proclamation that you cited. For example the Verse that was revealed right before the proclamation which nullifies his Prophethood if he fails to proclaim what has been commanded, and the verse of Completion/Perfection was revealed right after the proclamation of Hazrat Ali, and there was a Pledge of Allegiance by the present Companions (including AbuBakr,Umar,Uthman) to Ali after the proclamation. The Hadith of 12 Imams/Caliphs after the Prophet, Hadith of Ahlulbayt (Kissa) and the Verse of Purification. Remember Hadiths have corresponding Qur’anic revelations. And bear in mind that the word of the Prophet is the word of GOD. Obedience to him is obedience to GOD. Whatever he says is a commandment from GOD. Also, you have to take into consideration how GOD reprimanded Aisha in the Quran because of the Battle of the Camel. Consider also the Hadiths and verse which require us to follow and love the Purified Ahlulbayt. And so on and so forth. You can find these hadiths in both Sunni and Shia books.
Al-Baqarah 2:134 تِلْكَ أُمَّةٌ قَدْ خَلَتْۖ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتْ وَلَكُم مَّا كَسَبْتُمْۖ وَلَا تُسْـَٔلُونَ عَمَّا كَانُوا۟ يَعْمَلُونَ That was a nation which has passed on. It will have [the consequence of] what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do. Al-Hashr 59:10 وَٱلَّذِينَ جَآءُو مِنۢ بَعْدِهِمْ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا ٱغْفِرْ لَنَا وَلِإِخْوَٰنِنَا ٱلَّذِينَ سَبَقُونَا بِٱلْإِيمَٰنِ وَلَا تَجْعَلْ فِى قُلُوبِنَا غِلًّا لِّلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ رَبَّنَآ إِنَّكَ رَءُوفٌ رَّحِيمٌ And [there is a share for] those who came after them, saying, "Our Lord, forgive us and our brothers who preceded us in faith and put not in our hearts [any] resentment toward those who have believed. Our Lord, indeed You are Kind and Merciful." I wonder why a true follower of the prophet Muhammad SAW will not heed to these verses because Allah having knowledge of what happened, is happening and will happen has precautioned us so that we don't erase our scanty good deeds by slandering the noble companions of the holy prophet Muhammad SAW, who were praised by Allah in the Quran and by the prophet Muhammad SAW himself in several authentic ahadith, thus should we think they did something wrong we also atimes err and never were they angels, majority of the companions followed them, Islam triumphed in their hands Ali was in good terms with all of them and supported them in their respective terms of office and prayed with them. So what at all is our problem...Yaa Allah guide the community of Muhammad SAW upon what is best for them, Aameen..Jazaakumullah khayran and forgive me if my comments hurt anyone Wassalamu Alaikum.
First of all, many thanks to your non bias approach it really allows for a seeker of truth to make a just approach to the information given !!! Subscribed !!!
@@sidreb7642 Ok, Shia's do not accept Ali as the next successor SIMPLY because he is family, it is because the Prophet ANNOUNCED him at the day of Ghadeer Khumm. Him being family of the Prophet simply follows the theme of Allah choosing lineages such as Prophet Ibrahim and his son, Prophet Mosus and his brother Aaron, etc.
@@sidreb7642 Abu Bakr disobeyed the Prophet by not joining Usama bin Zayds army, all while the Prophet was sick. Now let me ask you, when the Prophet was sick and wanted to write a will to prevent the Ummah from being misguided, who was the one to stop him? And what name was the Prophet called?
@@sidreb7642 I did, read again. Maybe you are not familiar with the History of the prayer story, and how the Prophet was mad at Abu Bakr and Umar for trying to lead it. This was during the time he ordered them to join Usama's army.
@@sidreb7642 This is the narration you are referring to: Narrated 'Aisha: When the Prophet, became ill in his fatal illness, someone came to inform him about the prayer, and the Prophet told him to tell Abu Bakr to lead the people in the prayer. I said, "Abu Bakr is a soft-hearted man and if he stands for the prayer in your place, he would weep and would not be able to recite the Qur'an." The Prophet said, "Tell Abu Bakr to lead the prayer." I said the same as before. He (repeated the same order and) on the third or the fourth time he said, "You are the companions of Joseph. Tell Abu Bakr to lead the prayer." So Abu Bakr led the prayer and meanwhile the Prophet felt better and came out with the help of two men; as if I see him just now dragging his feet on the ground. When Abu Bakr saw him, he tried to retreat but the Prophet beckoned him to carry on. Abu Bakr retreated a bit and the Prophet sat on his (left) side. Abu Bakr was repeating the Takbir (Allahu Akbar) of Allah's Apostle for the people to hear. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 11, Number 680-681 The question: If the prophet peace be upon him and his pure family was the one who ordered Abu Bakr to lead the prayer, then why did he later go to the mosque “dragging his feet on the ground” while he was experiencing his “fatal illness” and lead the prayer himself while sitting down? This is the only time in history someone has led a prayer while sitting. This proves that once the prophet realised the plot of Aisha, he became very angry describing Aisha and Hafsa as “the companions of Joseph” and with his “fatal illness” he decided to go to the mosque to prevent what others now claim. This was the reply of the brother to you: Narrated Ibn Umar: Allah's Apostle appointed Usama bin Zaid as the commander of some people. Those people criticised his leadership. The Prophet said, "If you speak ill of his leadership, you have already spoken ill of his father's leadership before. By Allah, he deserved to be a Commander, and he was one of the most beloved persons to me and now this (i.e. Usama) is one of the most beloved persons to me after him. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 552 Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 744-745 This Abu Bakr and Umar were supposed to be under the leadership of Usama instead they critisized it and left it to plot their coup. Aisha may Allah curse her wanted her father to be leader as well so she said the lie: Narrated Al-Aswad: It was mentioned in the presence of 'Aisha that the Prophet had appointed 'Ali as successor by will. Thereupon she said, "Who said so? I saw the Prophet, while I was supporting him against my chest. He asked for a tray, and then fell on one side and expired, and I did not feel it. So how (do the people say) he appointed 'Ali as his successor?" Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 736 Just a note, the Holy Prophet peace be upon him and his pure family passed on the chest of Ali peace be upon him and this is narrated in your books.
Regarding the video description, the definition of fitnah is not civil war. It has multiple meanings but the most comprehensible one would be a "trial" or "test". It's best to remove the word fitnah from the description.
What the heck? You crazy fool. What are you talking about? You guys are brainwashed to hate good people for no reason. Woe to those who hate the good companions of Prophet saw Amr ibn Al-‘As reported: I said, “Which person is most beloved to you?” The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Aisha.” I said, “I mean among men.” The Prophet said, “Her father.” I said, “Then who?” The Prophet said, “Umar ibn al-Khattab,” and he mentioned some other men. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3462, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2384 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authentic) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim عن عَمرو بْن الْعَاصِ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قُلْتُ أَيُّ النَّاسِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ النَّبِي صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَائِشَةُ فَقُلْتُ مِنْ الرِّجَالِ فَقَالَ أَبُوهَا قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ ثُمَّ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ فَعَدَّ رِجَالًا 3462 صحيح البخاري كتاب فضائل الصحابة باب قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لو كنت متخذا خليلا 2384 صحيح مسلم كتاب فضائل الصحابة باب من فضائل أبي بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه
@@farruhismoilov7496,, I advisey all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth. Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
Thanks for explaining this. As someone that likes history I always wondered what led to this schism, because apparently that still influences the middle-east geopolitics. By looking at the comments I saw that this is a very debatable subject. You guys should do a video about the political implications of this schism in the recent history
5:50 According to Shia sources, the story of denouncement of Ali(AS) goes like this: They agree to send delegates from each side to denounce their own leaders. Ali's delegate denounces him, while Muawiyya's delegate, Amru Ibn Al-As, considered one of the trickiest politicians of his time, betrays the treaty: "I, as I remove my ring from my finger, *[Removes Ring]* denounce *Ali* as the Caliph"
I am Sunni and I Said Ali R.A was right in those wars ...Muawiya was wrong and He did many Mistakes including introducing Kingship in his Own Family ...Islam early caliphate was based on Election and advises between the Muslims leaders and Chose a Competent Leader and it did not go in to family ....And Muaviya decision change the face of Islamic Ruling from electoral to kingship
If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
See the patience of prophet family, what happened after Prophet Muhammad. Imam Hussain had sacrifice his family including 6 month son to protect the actual Din.
Ali was known for his knowledge, his justice, bravery, loyalty etc etc........no one can match him, neither in the period of Muhammad life nor after the death of Muhammad. He was the true seccessor and the most deserved Caliph.
I'm not Muslim but I can 100% understand and sport Shias. Why are the Shias are 10% of muslims? I think because everyone says Shias are not muslims and that's make it easy to hate them and don't understand their words and believes
Like many in the west, I know very little about Islam, so thank you for this video. It sounds like there was a lot of infighting over political power in the early days. It also sounds like the Shia have a strong reason to feel like Ali got seriously ripped off-- first on Muhammad's death, and then in the killing of his descendants. My question is why is there such conflict between Sunni and Shia today? Are there major *doctrinal* differences in their views on God/Allah, or how Muslims should live? My personal view is that a) it's a tragedy-- and an insult to the Creator-- for his children to kill each other over their beliefs, and b) this killing is a far greater crime than worshipping the "wrong way." But this seems like an even bigger tragedy if the core reason Sunni and Shia fight and kill each other is over the actions of power-hungry leaders hundreds of years ago. Thank you for any answers here-- I'm asking in good faith.
Joe Colletti Allah (god) has closed off the chapter of prophecy with the last prophet, Muhammad pbuh. That is why it is meant for the prophet Muhammad’s relatives to pass away and not lead and rule.
This was a very good video. There are some really important facts missing. Eg. Yazid was not a good character and islam was falling apart. So Imam Hussain would not pledge allegiance to him . His family were massacre and the woman imprisoned . This was the grandson ofbthe Holy Phrophet. How can anyone not acknowledge that this was wrong on so many levels.
amazing that this man knows more history than probably half of our own sunni and shia brothers. I want to try to make a logical statement and I don't want to argue too much with the brothers but doesn't it make sense that god would leave a successor after our beloved prophet (S.A.W.S) to protect the message of our beloved messenger? If god didn't leave an appointed successor, do you not think that the message would have been altered like the message of our previous beloved prophets e.g Isa (Jesus). Now think this through, Allah the all knowing would know that if he did not appoint a successor the message will change like the message of Isa (A.S), so what does he do, the all knowing Allah knows that on the prophets last miraj, he will need to appoint a successor to prevent the message from being altered, so what does he do? he decides to appoint a leader from among the muslims, Allah decides the person most suitable to carry along the true message of Islam, who would be Ali ibn Abu Talib. The man who was born in the cleanest place (Kaaba), spent the most time with the prophet, was there with the messenger of allah the most out of all the sahabas, married to one of the purest of women (Fatima (A.S)) the prophets daughter. Was it all a coincedence?, or was it all of allahs plan? Ill end it with this. surah 8 verse 30 ( when the faithless plotted against you to take you captive, they plotted and allah devised and allah is the best of devisers). no matter how many times the enemies of allah try to destroy Islam, true Islam will never perish but true islam will be practiced by few percentage of people. Dont spread hatred and remembet the time will come when Isa (A.S) and imam mehdi will bring the truth to the world. Be vary of the day oh fellow muslims, be prepared. Salam alleykum.
As an academic, there are certain points that you have stated incorrectly. Ali ibne Abu Talib's followers did not instigate the war against Ayesha. Ayesha lead a force against Ali. His son, Hasan was poisoned by Mowavia. There many smaller points, but the point that is very important. The Shia belief is that as Mohummad was the "Prophet", "Rasool by divine right so the successor of Mohummad is also a divine choice. That is the key contention. The Shia believe that Mohummad did not decide who his successor was, he announced what was the Divine anointment at Ghadeer-e-Khum. Thank you for your hard work.
I was only confused between this shia Muslim debate thanks sir for clearing this confusion. Now I came to know that there is nothing but hate politics between shias and muslims. I am a Sunni and I love shias.
Can anyone specifically a Shia person explain why Ali was hesitant to bring the murderer of Osman to justice? Osman was a friend of prophet and among the 10 persons granted paradise while alive same as Ali.. How come Ali didn't stand for his murdered friend who happened to be the Islamic ruler?
The problem is that that Ali (r) was not elected to the position of Khalif, that is why problem started.... Ali didn't move the capital to the Kufa, rather Ali moved there, after he was not elected. As in Kufa he had supporters.
This is why democracy is most important. And why hindering the integrity of voting is a major issue America is suffering from today. The calif of the United States is stepping outside its boundaries and must be humbled.
We may differ in a few matters, but our differences are only limited to discussion or debate which can be resolved, not a conflict or hatred, and our differences were merely a political dispute and should not be a theological dispute. Despite this, our ancestors remained united under one umbrella [i.e. Islam] and they shared the same Aqidah because of the Qur'an and the teachings of our Beloved Prophet (ﷺ). We too can unite. ❤️
I understand that your trying to keep the history close to what it says in the books, but I believe that you should reach out to get a little more knowledge about the conflict since history is written by the victors.
Omar Omar ma man. Don’t need to be a bigot. Yazid was a Sunni that killed the prophets family. Ur a wahbi. Wallah just stop. We are all Muslims. We have to respect eachother. We both have pillars and worship Allah. Stop being so closed minded. Yazid was a disgrace to Muslims. Sunnis agree to it as well. Just stop being a troll pls and grow up honestly. Reading ur comments disgust me.
@@kingkatiin2658 What are you talking about? Our holy sites are different from yours. We include the grave sites of the Great Imams while you reject them. We are only 10% yet control all of Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and now Syria and Yemen. Your numbers have weakened your leadership, just like in history you never had a strong leadership system.
To be clear, those people in Ali's army who provoked each battle were what later became the the Khawarij. Also the killers of Uthman (ra) were in the army of Ali (ra). They didn't want to be caught.
@Abbas Ali the one who kill hz aisha camel was hz muhammad ibn abi bakr another adopted sons not muhammad al hanafiyah he also escorted her (hz aisha) back to madina with respect from amirul mukminin order he (amirul mukminin) choose hz muhamnad ibn abi bakr becouse of blood line and this is how he (amurul mukminin) pay respect for hz aisha
@@Yassinekamp are you kidding me??? till today no clear evidence who was the killer of hz uthman some say A, B or C but all never been accepted in both sunni shia scholar house of hz uthman was be besieged for more 2month and no help from his cousin, the governor of syam... is that another joke right? and hz ali and his family was protetcting hz uthman house... and you believe the story they (hz uthman killer) join hz ali army??? the story was made to justify the REVOLT againt true Amir
5:12 Ali did accept to give up his position as leader, but was re-elected. By this point his original followers did not like him because he had accepted the fair election. I wish Sal corrected this.
I am Sunni Syed. To be honest, the truth is in the middle of both Shia and Sunni versions. Both are at extremes. If you read different versions of history and think critically then both just want to justify anything they heard; however, the reality is in the middle. Allah will ask us, you had my Quran. We have the responsibility to use our minds which is a gift from Allah and find the truth. Don't believe what are you born with, search for the truth why Allah sent us here. It is very easy to tell others non-muslim and consider yourself/your-beliefs perfect without any struggle.
I advise all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth. Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
There wasn't peace. It isn't the religion of peace that some says. The Quran said to defend what is right, not to simply surrender. So any petty misconceptions may lead to a bloody war indeed.
I really don't get people who claim to be Muslim and yet are so ignorant about their own religion. Islam doesnt mean peace. It is not a pacifist religion. Islam = surrender to the will of Allah (swt). Salam= peace. Muslims need to prioritize learning about our religion because it is a requirement. Just a point of order..carry on
@@er3947 I think the big thing happening nowadays is that a lot of countries are becoming more secular and worrying about being politically correct. People are becoming more materialistic and attached to this donya, as if they will live forever. It is sad.
@Faster Hard House Islam teaches not to attack others unless attacked first. Just because people back in history were human like the rest of us and fallible, does not change Islam's teachings.
@@Jen-dk7ct Islam teaches (not the meaning of the word 'islam'), I mean teachings in Quran & hadith, not to attack others unless they attack you first.
Nice presentation, some in-accurate statements, Ali’s army being over zealous and the aggressor is an heinous statement and false. Ali pleaded before the fight to stop the war in Jamal and buried his opponents and had a funeral for them. The war in siffen, the war was won by Ali, yet he stopped it when Mauwiya camp said let’s have a peace treaty which was bogus but saved Mauwiya’s skin. After these wars and another one against the khawaraj, they (khawaraj) were the over zealous ones and broke away from Imam Ali for having a peace treaty and ended up fighting Ali. In 3.5 years of Ali ‘Caliphate’ he fought three wars, for this reason his son Hasan (as) didn’t want to enter a 4th war and negotiated a peace treaty. Peace treaty isn’t giving in, this type of peace treaty was done with the Prophet Mohammed (s) from a position of strength and not weakness. Also keep in mind Mauwiya and Yazid were sons of Abu Sufyan and Hind (staunch enemies from Islam and only converted to Islam after defeat and not to be outcast in Arabia.
Y would people think Muhammed would ever want his family attacked, and such violence to spread after his death between the people he cared about most? Prophets are supposed to be special people and u don't just pass down control if he was truly the one why wouldn't they just follow his teachings and leave it at that? Is there no form of Islam that just stops at Muhammed and doesn't get involved with what seems to be pure politics and just try to live based on the teaching of their actual prophet and nobody else?
Who conquered Syria, Iraq and Persia? Umar bin Khattab (Sunni) Who has conquered the country of Sindi, India and the countries around the oxus river (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan.)? Muhammad bin Al-Qasim (Sunni) Who is expanding North Africa? Qutaibah bin Muslim Al-Bahily (Sunni) Who conquered Andalusia? Tariq bin Ziyad (Sunni) and Musa bin Nushair (Sunni) Who was the conqueror of Konstantinovel? Muhammad Al-Fatih (Sunni) Who conquered Sicily? Asad bin Al-Furaat (Sunni) Who created civilization in Andalusia and made it a center of knowledge? The second Umawiyyah caliphs (Ahlus Sunnah) Who was the Commander in Chief of the Muslims in the Battle of Hittin? Saladin Al-Ayyuby (Sunni) Who led the Muslims in the battle of A'in Jalut and defeated the Tatars? Saifuddin Qutz (Sunni) and Ruknuddin Baibars (Sunni) Who managed to break the arrogance of Spain in Morocco? Abdul Karim Al-Khattaby (Sunni) Who forced Italy to leave Libya? Umar Al-Mukhtar (Sunni) Then what is the Shia merit Who had betrayed Al-Husein, persuaded him to come out to kufah and then defected from him in karbala? Al-Mukhtar As-saqafi (Shia) Who betrayed the Abbasid caliph Al-Radhi billah in front of the Mongols? The Buwaihy (Shia) Who paved the way for the Tatars to enter Baghdad? Ibn Al-Alqamy (Shia) Who considered Hulagu Khan's actions good? Naseer Ath-Thusy (Shia) Who helped the Tatars in their invasion of Syria? (Shia) Who is allied with France against the Muslims? Fatimid State (Shia) Who betrayed the Sultanate of the Seljuk? Tugril Bek al-Basasiri (Shia) Who helped the crosses to control Baitul Maqdis? Ahmad bin Atha (Shia) Who masterminded the murder of Sulthan Saladin Al-Ayyuby? Kanzud daulah (Shia) Who welcomed Hulagu Khan to Syria? Kamaluddin bin badr Ath-Taflisy (Shia) Who stole the Hajar Aswad and slaughtered the pilgrims at the Masjid al-Haram? Abu Thahir Al-Qarmathy (Shia) Who helped Napoleon Bonaparte in his attack on Sham? (Shia) And now, Who stands with the Basyar
Just to clear one point. Sunnis also view Yazid as a bad ruler. What he did was horrible regardless of the identity of his victims. Also Muawiya should have listened and plead allegiance to Ali as the 4th caliph. He was too blinded by his desire of revenging Uthman.
If first 3 caliphs was on right path, Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad?? Why he burned the door of fatima?? Why he take the fidakk of fatima?? Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah?? Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt Bring me authentic Hadiths to support your claims. All you will find is shia fabricated talk with weak or no chains of narrations. Fatima died six months after the prophet pbuh died. So literally, she died more than 1 year before Abu bakr died and you're telling me she did not talk to the 3 caliphs ??? She didn't even know who will become Caliph next. Also, why does she need to talk to them? None of them were her Mahram (blood related, brother, father, son), so she's not supposed to be around them. Please step outside of your Shia bubble and research the truth. The Shia went way too far in their delusions.
@@osumanaaa9982,, Bro, You asked me, therefore i searched the books and giving reference, so, first confirm and accept reality.. I was sunni, But now, i am alhamdulillah shia based on 5 year of research.. Syeda fatima didn't talk with abu bakr, umar and usman till shahadatt. She was known about them because they did not give the hazrat ali his right,, On the occarion of bayyatt, Hazrat umar burned the door of fatima sa, and the burning door fell over her ribs and her coming son(those name comes as Mohsin in books) killed.. Fatima zehra was seriously injured and this became the reason of her death,, She told hazrat ali don't let them to participate in her funeral... All these are present in authentic books of both shia and sunni.. Sunni reference: Sahi bukhari, jild2,page675. Sahi bukhari jild 2,page 455. Sahi muslim, jild 1,page 94. Musanif ibn e abi shaiba, jild8, page 572.. These some parts are also present in sahi bukhri.. Shia reference: Book usul kafi, by syed ibn e tawoos, Jild 5, page 465, Malla yahzarul faqeeh, Jild 7page 112, Allama majlisi books 4,6.. And also written in other books of shia.. She was martyred by abu bakr.. I hope that you will study and get reality,, Sunni molvees don't tell the actual realities.. So, Study islam by own study,,
Well, Aisha and Ali had compromised. But the third party [the enemy of Islam] attacked on both of the parties. The people who attacked on Ali's party were speaking the slogans that they're the people of Aisha. And the people who attacked Aisha's party were speaking the slogans that they're the people of Ali.
Im not Muslim I am just trying to learn about this topic right now, and I am a little confused on one thing (I doubt anyone will repspond to me since this is 2021). If Shias believed that descendants of Muhammed should be the next leaders of the Muslim community, then why did they want Ali to be the leader even though he was Muhammed's son in law, which means means he is not related to him?
That hassan peace treaty of electing is not true. The deal was that after him (muawiya) the caliphate goes to him (Hassan) unless if he aint alive then it goes to Hussain.
haha... you think the grand son of prophet saww desire power??? he (hz hassan) was elected not take of power and never make treaty becouse he desire power when muawiya passed away the caliph will back to ummah!!! that is the treaty
Great job but you're missing some crucial points,
1. The reason why Hazrat Ali refused to bring justice to Uthman's killers was because the killers were too large in number and H.Ali wasn't ready to punish the large number of people without the proper facts and records so that no innocent is punished
2. Muaviya was wrong to oppose H.Ali. It was clear he only wanted his clan, Ummayads, to rule. Uthman was also wrong to put too many rulers from his own family - clearly the Ummayads wanted domination in the Muslim empire. Without Muaviya's alliegance Hazrat Ali was scared his rule would be weakened and would cause problems similar to those that happened to Uthman.
3. Hazrat Hassan did not refuse to fight because of a weak army. He was the grandson of Holy Prophet and would put up a great opposition but he refused since he didn't want any bloodshed
4. Imam Hussain did not only refuse allegiance to Yazeed because he broke the treaty but also because he was a person straying away from Islam, he would gamble, drink wine and commit sins hence Imam Hussain wasn't ready to hand over the Muslim empire to someone filled with falsehood.
4. The people of Kufa were at the side of Imam Hussain, however, after the Imam received letters of support Yazeed placed a very strict anti-Hussain ruler who would kill/torture anyone who took the Imams side hence everyone backed out
Yh agreed al important points and point number 4 is very important
al-kufi la yufi
Ibn Ziad
The anti Hussain(a.s.) ruler
Sir in histry student. Can i ask questios about this topic
Also, if Muawiya was so sincere to Uthman's cause, how many people did he punish for |Uthman's murder in his long reign of over 2 decades?
Don't say hazrat hassan (a.s) couldn't fight coz of weak army,actually he was grandson of prophet who was never in favour of human bloodshed for power,so he went for peace treaty coz of his best training by prophet, where love of power never exists.hassan and hussain were embodiment of love and sacrifices. They n their father never loved power n control. They just loved humanity.
facts are facts
About time I read a comment that is correct for once unlike the Omar Omar guy😂😂.
Stop idolatry.
Exactly hazrat ali a.s is known as shere khuda why would he be afraid of anyone...... He won the battle of khyber with very few army members....... Just he wanted peace that's he didn't want any battle
@@shabimirza2497 Hazrat Ali (RA) was so brave and his faith in Allah was so firm that he would be happy to give his life fighting in the way of Allah. They don't have much knowledge in this field.
Facts on Yazid that was missed in the video-
1) Yazid was the son of Muoweya
2) Yazid was not a great human, let alone be the leader. He was Evil.
3) He sent an Army of 30,000 to kill Imam Hussain, his family and companions whom altogether were 72 people. By these figures, clearly he was a psycho.
Imam Hussain stood up against oppression, he was betrayed by the Kufa people whom said they were with him but disappeared after the threats of Yazid.
Karbala is not a forgettable event. It consists of sacrifice, courage, bravery, leadership, family, true companionship, fight against oppression, fight for freedom, fight for what is right against the wrong. He was from the blood of Prophet Muhammad, yet he was brutelly murdered and then you have some people who say they are Muslim, yet overlook this event.
exactly🍃♥️
Facts 💯
Perfect Answer brother ! This video wrongly guide the muslims ! Spreading false history !
Yazeed sent total 18 people from Syria to control Kufa and remaining army belonged to Kufa. The same very people who invited Hussain a.s to Kufa they broke the pledge they have made with Muslim bin Aqeel and left those 72 in Karbala.
Yazeed kutta pa lanatt..
Yazid followers knows Hussain was right but they were so scared 😱 of
Yazid instead of fearing Allah (swt)
Tbh I have never liked Muawiyya and Umayyad Caliphate, even If I'm a Sunni. The heck were they thinking killing off Muhammad's family like that? I would like to hear about the Shia version really, as this video is hardly balanced, maybe the division isn't as bad as it seems and finally we can at least say hello without going to each other's throat.
Well just look into history and you will discover that Yazid and Muawiyya weren't even practicing Muslims by any means, for example Yazid used to drink. They just wanted the power at that time in history, for them it wasn't about islam at all. While Hassan and Husayn couldn't accept that the religion which their grandfather(!) brought was treated like that, they had no option but going to war with Muawiyya and Yazid.
Kevin Kameswara what do you want to know about the Shia version? That they been oppressed by most” Muslim people” at the time? That no one actually listened to what the prophet had to say? That no one followed the Quran when it said” I ask nothing of you but love for my kin” yet the same person you say RA yo fought against the blood of the prophet.
Ali was killed by the same people who killed Uthman. So that wasn't the Sunni's, Hassan died and they claim it was no poison with no proof. And Husayn was killed right in front of those same Shia who claimed they would help him.
Anyways none of that matters, what matters is what's the true Islam. And Shia accuse the majority of the companions of being hypocrites including Uthman RA who was incharge of the complete version of the Quran we read today and Umar RA and Aisha RA and Ibn Umar and Abu Huraira who gave is a lot of hadith
Omar Omar so your saying the same people that killed uthman killed Ali? Than why did aisha fight against Ali? Than muawiya fought against Ali and than the khawarj.
Uthman didn’t gather the Quran, it was in his time, doesn’t mean he wrote it or gathered any of it.
And abu hurrara came to Islam 3 years prior to the death of the prophet yet he has over 5000 Hadiths.
@@mmsaf17 ماشالله Abu Huraira after narrated hadith doesn't disprove anything first off, secondly the same rebels who killed Uthman in order to get Ali into power killed Ali RA because he decided to sign a peace treaty with Muawiyah. That's just proven history. Lastly in the Quran it says Allah was pleased with the Muhajiroon and Ansar so you'll have to bring me a clear verse saying they were bad or only to follow the Family of the Prophet for me to give an ear to anything the Shia have to say
Again me being Suni believes that the battle of Karbala was the saddest day in the history of this wold.
Us sunnis believe that what happened there was a tradegy and awful HOWEVER the shias equate the grandchildren to the Prophet and to other prophets mentioned in the Quran. It's amazing how they divided Islam over a political situation
Last name First name well if it wasn’t for your mate muawiya this divide wouldn’t have happened so if you wanna blame someone for this divide it should be muawiya. He’s the reason this tragedy happened and you sunnis love him. Which proves that you don’t care about what happened nor do you think it’s a tragedy. I can see through your bull$h’t dude.
@@8achim936 the reason the divide happened is because Shias can't move on from that tradegy. We don't even mourn the Prophet's death the way you mourn the deaths of ordinary human beings that had no prophetic. Muawiya and Ali's hate was nothing more than a poltical situation. Muawiya himself wasn't a good Muslim and no sunnis regard him as The perfect example of a true Muslim however that doesn't change the fact that Ali (RA) and muawiya had issues regarding policies which is a political situation. The reason Islam is currently divided is because Shia's can't accept that a tradgrh occurred to the leader of a POLITICAL party and treat Ali (RA) as if he was a Prophet himself which is wrong. Was Ali (RA) a great man ? Yes! Was what happened to his children a tradegy? Yes but should we continue to argue about a political situation that occurred so long ago? No. Sunnis respect all the caliphs of Islam but do not give them more importance than the other Prophets mentioned in the Quran nor do they think the Caliphs were on equal footing with the Prophet himself or the Prophet's that came before him as The Quran itself mentions the Prophet and other prophets but makes no mention of any of the Caliphs. After the Prophet, everyone else was a human no different than me and you.
Again what Yazeed did was awful and unforgivable but again to continue to mourn so heavily for the grandsons and to call on their names for help is insane. They were political parties/opponents and was no different than a president being assassinated. Would you mourn a president you really liked and thought was a great man thousands of years after his assassination and then call his name for help ? It's once again illogical what shias do especially in Islam where you can't ask for anyone's help besides the All Mighty. The Holy Prophet himself didn't want statues or pictures of himself so people didn't pray or call his name instead of the name of God yet shias completely ignore this and call for Hussein/Hassan and Ali (RA).
@@lastnamefirstname4678 Us Shias understand only Allah (God) is Caretaker of all, and us shias ONLY call for help from Almighty Allah. We call for 'Ya Husain, Ya Ali, Ya Hasan because Muhammed PBUH's own heart was with these 3 amazing men. Ali (R) was his beloved nephew (blood relative), Hasan (R) was his beloved grandson and Hussain (R) was the younger grandson. These 2 grandsons literally grew up on the shoulders of Prophet Muhammed PBUH; playing and laughing.
In your mind imagine this, If our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH witnessed with his own eyes the assassinations of Ali (R), Hasan (R) and Hussain (R) and rest of their family, he would mourn their deaths with the heaviest heart, he would beat himself crying until the pain would be too much and he would be calling on them Ya Ali Ya Hasan Ya Hussain all night, for nights to come. When you look at what the shias do during Muharram, it is the exact same behavior of crying, feeling the pain of the survivors of Karbala and calling the names of those 3 honorable men.
Shias feel the pain of our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH, and they feel it DEEPLY. That's where the difference is where I find that shias are the True followers. True because Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself would take a month (that's what Muharram is) to mourn the deaths of his family members, just like shias do today. It's important to know that shias are intuitively and emotionally more connected to our beloved Prophet Muhammed PBUH himself and his beloved family. A lot more than the sunnis'. It's important because Islam itself is an intuitive religion, as well as a political one and has many attributes, just like how Allah (swt) has attributes, and that's why Islam a successful religion, and will continue to be.
The so called shias that call for help to other than Allah (swt), don't actually understand Islam as a whole themselves.
Islam is a beautiful religion. I'm grateful to have Islam chosen me. And I chose it back. Alhamdulillah. :)
@@zainnaqvi23 That's not true at all. Islam forbids calling out anyone's name for help and even against excessive mourning. Islam also forbids causing harm to yourself like how shia's routinely do during Muharam.
Your claim of if the Prophet (pbuh) saw what happened to his grandchildren he would do the same things shias currently do is wrong as evident by what the Prophet (pbuh) did during the year of tradegy. The Prophet never resulted to beating himself or crying excessively for his wife or his uncle whom he loved greatly. Once again you should give more charity or hand out food during the months of muharam as it was a tradegy however Shia's do things that are not permissible in Islam as evident by how the Prophet(pbuh) mourned during his life time.
Also shia's place the grandchildren and Ali (RA) in equal footing with the other Prophets of Islam. We don't even mourn Prophet Isa after he was hung on a cross which was equally as horrible as an example
Stay United, we are Muslims and only Muslims
Don't hate even non Muslims
Agree with you. We should judge a person by their character and actions, not religion.
naam hindu kyu h fir kashi nath
This Video (including part 1 and 2) was so amazingly simple and clear about the difference of Shia and Sunni.. Thanks for the time and efforts you brought to bring this to people.. I dont feel there is any difference about being called as Shia and Sunni, except some political difference and situation that demanded separation on group of people. Because I feel Shia and Sunni still stand on same faith of One Allah and Prophet Mohammed. And rest is just opinion who should have been caliphate, which should not separate us different as Muslims.
untill that point we were ONE entity but later on some people tried to rewrite Islam like reprogramming the System so they get the outcome they wanted...and for this reason the original Programm needed to be erased...which is the reason that all of the Imams ended in rather tragic Situations...if you want to know more go google it an you will see how the "Caliphs" rewrote islam
Thank you. Your videos have helped many many around the world. Also in Afghanistan.
My math skills are mastered by Khan Academy, and has been very useful since.
Junaidul Islam ok mr kaafir. Afghanistan zendabad
Nissan GTR what do you mean?
Hadrat Ali (AS) never attacked first. He send messengers with a gift of The Holy Quran and it was the other side that murdered the messengers. After that Hadrat Ali (AS) had to confront the them.
You are right
I don't think so. None of the two sides wanted to fight because both sides had companions of the prophet and they only wanted to solve the issue. It was some people (regardless of what side) who disobeyed the orders and attacked first. It's not clear who they were and some even say they might have been from the same group who killed Uthman.
Its Hazrat Ali RA
A.S is used for prophets, please refrain from making changes to Islam
Thanks
@@fatimafatima3283 prophet s.a.w ali is the eternal complete Quran and eman..
We are just following what ali taught Hussain a.s, what Hussain a.s taught his son zain ul abideen a.s...
you are right Imam Ali was in favor of unison of Muslims...
I am sunni but i love and respect all Muslim brothers.
no sunni no shia ..we all only muslims who follow quran and prophet muhammad.
@WhiteHair Rules nice hate bro... who taught you such a nice hate ?
@WhiteHair Rules allahu akbar
@WhiteHair Rules sunni = following the sunna of mohamed , my advice to all of you is to learn arabic before doing any kind of debate between shia and sunni , just be muslim and follow most importantly quran ( and of course in second place authentic hadith )
I am Shia and I agree. Bless you
One important point you're missing about Hassan-Muawiya treaty is that the Islamic Prophet PBUH had prophecized about this in an earlier Hadith. It is written in the most authentic Hadith books of the Sunni's.
"This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him."
Reference: Volume 3, Book 49, Number 867
It's amazing to me that people are still fighting battles that began centuries ago. It keeps going in circles even though we all have the ability to stop the momentum and realize that there is only now.
keep in mind that This is a very biased view from the point of view of sunnis.
Alhamdulillah, I am a Muslim inclined to the Sunni understanding of Islam, but I love and wish the best for all Muslims, I believe we can forget what happened among the companions of the prophet Muhammad SAW and rather follow the Quran and authentic narrations from the prophet Muhammad SAW. I believe they shall account for what they did and we shall not be questioned of what they did so why fret and say things about these people when we should rather be worried about ourselves.
Perfectly agree. Do you know why there is a satan sho misleads people and people have no knowledge they are just becoming like Hawarijs who killed Ali ra because their lack of knowledge even if they were too pious they were stupid in the sense that they did not get knowledge. Lets obey Allah and His messenger. Assalamu alaykum wa rohmatullohi wa barokatuh
If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
Well said as sunni we agreed
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt All these are deviant fabrications. Ali (r) never repelled during the period of the first caliphas. He was, neither the AHLUL bayt were power quran.Shias are stupid, in bringing this topic to the surface again n again. I hope this will not continue until judgement day.
SUNNI ARE SUCH LIEING JEWS EVEN THOSE ARABS AT THE TIME OF PROPHET MUHHAMAD WERE ALL KAFIRS AND JUST THE SAME AS SOME CHRISTIANS WHO GO AGAINST JESUS IS THE SAME WITH THESE SUNNIS THERE JUST BELIEVING IN JEW IEDOLOGY THAT SOME MESSIAH WILL COME AND WIPE OUT THE NON BELIEVERS... THESE SUNNI ARE SUCH FAKE MUSLIMS ITS SO FUNNY THAT WHEN THEY GET EXPOSED THERE LIKE YEAH WERE ALL MUSLIM BUT IN OTHER VIDS THESE SAME PPL GOING AROUND SAYING SHIA IS FAKE BUNCH OF INTERNETTROLLS
You also forgot to mention that Yazid was Muawiya's (RA) son. But that's understood I guess. You are doing a tremendous job explaining such a complex and difficult issue in such a lucid and compact manner. Never thought it was possible. Of course the nuances are missed but for an overview of the issue (including some of the nuances) this is a brilliant effort.
p.s you have actually captured a fair bit of the nuances. Which makes it even more brilliant.
shiajew - yes Muwaiyah Radiyallahu anhu, family with Prophet peace & blessings be on him, shia jews both worship Hussain RAdiayllahu anhu and led to his death you hypocrite not Sunnis. shias have names like Abdul Hussain, shirk is in the name! similar to the romans and jews who led to so called death of Jesus Alehas Salam and prayed to him.
When you read your books you will know that the liars are you,
There is a huge difference between the religion of Muawiya and the people of Sakifa and the religion of Muhammad and Al Muhammad...
he said descendant, do you not know what that means?
@Jim smith you do realise he was the enemy of Ali and Hassan, and his father Sufwan was enemy of the prophet SAWS and his son was the enemy of hussain...
Muawiyah wanted bloodshed of prophet family.. how can he be r.a
Hassan had bigger army but he did not want to have anymore war. Please correct that information.
NO Mu’awiya had the bigger army.
Please correct you information
@@dalmar5567 bruh you really think muwaiya stood a chance against imam hassan(a.s.) who had the blood of prophet mohammad in his veins?
Left the part where Kufa people wrote thousands of letters to Hazrat Husnain (RA) and then betrayed him. Not a single person came to defend him. They even caught and gave his close friend Hazrat Muslim (RA) to yazid, who beheaded him.
I don't understand, this divide between Shia and Sunni Muslims. Sunni Muslims also see the 'battle of Karbala' as a significant event in Muslim history.
What happened after that? What side does Sunni Muslims take? Can you please discuss if you know about it?
Nadeem Shaikh they basically say that it’s a big event but it happens and we should not hype it even tho they are the grandparent of the prophet. Btw the father of yazid is holy according to Sunnis so that doesn’t make sense. After the killing of Hussein we have The continuation of the 12 imams and the majority of them did also get oppressed and killed. But the Sunnis doesn’t acknowledge them.
@@jafaral-badri8005 Okay and why was Yazid's father considered holy by Sunnis? Or why shouldn't they consider him holy?
Nadeem Shaikh The Sunnis say he was holy because he has meet the prophet but Shia says he is not holy because why should someone go to heaven just because they meet the prophet, they say that it’s unfair that someone goes to heaven only because they lived in a certain time and in a certain place. He is also considered bad for Shia because he fought Ali and probably killed hasan (Ali’s son)
@@jafaral-badri8005
Yeah, I really agree with Shia Muslims on this, why should anyone be considered holy just because he had met our Nabi (pbuh)?! But, only Allah knows what would happen.
Btw, why didn't Hazrat Ali (raz) gave more attention in finding out who killed Hazrat Uthman (raz)? And, how was their relation? Do people consider Hazrat Ali (raz) to have some connection in Hazrat Uthaman (raz)' assassination?
We have to follow Quran and sunnah rather than sunni and Shia....as Quran says we are muslims.....and we should follow Allah and his messenger & prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)
Abdul KrEeM
Someday (after his last pilgrimage) the Messenger of Allah (S) stood to give us a speech beside a pond which is known as Khum (Ghadir Khum) which is located between Mecca and Medina. Then he praised Allah and reminded Him, and then said: "O’ people! Behold! It seems the time approached when I shall be called away (by Allah) and I shall answer that call. Behold! I am leaving for you two precious things. First of them is the book of Allah in which there is light and guidance...The other one is my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. I remind you in the name of Allah about my Ahlul-Bayt. (three times)."
Sunni Reference:
• Sahih Muslim, Chapter of the virtues of the companions, section of the virtues of ‘Ali, 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v 4, p1873, Tradition #36.
The Messenger of Allah (S) said: "I am leaving for you two precious and weighty Symbols that if you adhere to BOTH of them you shall not go astray after me. They are, the Book of Allah, and my progeny, that is my Ahlul-Bayt. The Merciful has informed me that These two shall not separate from each other till they come to me by the Pool (of Paradise)."
Sunni references:
1. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 662-663,328, report of 30+ companions, with reference to several chains of transmitters.
2. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, Chapter of "Understanding (the virtues) of Companions, v3, pp 109,110,148,533 who wrote this tradition is authentic (Sahih) based on the criteria of the two Shaikhs (al-Bukhari and Muslim).
3. Sunan, by Daarami, v2, p432
4. Musnad, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v3, pp 14,17,26,59, v4, pp 366,370-372, v5, pp 182,189,350,366,419
5. Fadha’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p585, Tradition #990
6. al-Khasa’is, by al-Nisa’i, pp 21,30
7. al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 1, p230
8. al-Kabir, by al-Tabarani, v3, pp 62-63,137
9. Kanz al-Ummal, by al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Chapter al-Iti’sam bi Habl Allah, v1, p44.
10. Tafsir Ibn Kathir (complete version), v4, p113, under commentary of verse 42:23 of Qur’an (four traditions)
11. al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, by Ibn Sa’d, v2, p194, Pub. by Dar Isadder, Lebanon.
12. al-Jami’ al-Saghir, by al-Suyuti, v1, p353, and also in v2
13. Majma’ al-Zawa’id, al-Haythami, v9, p163
14. al-Fateh al-Kabir, al-Binhani, v1, p451
15. Usdul Ghabah fi Ma’rifat al-Sahaba, Ibn al-Athir, v2, p12
16. Jami’ al-Usul, Ibn al-Athir, v1, p187
17. History of Ibn Asakir, v5, p436
18. al-Taj al-Jami’ Lil Usul, v3, p308
19. al-Durr al-Manthoor, al-Hafidh al-Suyuti, v2, p60
20. Yanabi al-Mawaddah, al-Qundoozi al-Hanafi, pp 38,183
21. Abaqat al-Anwar, v1, p16
All shia follow the Holy prophet but does it not make sense that his family should continue the caliphate. And how can you ignore that yazid killed the Holy prophets grandson. Surely that is a time to mourn. Even if you dont mourn you have to acknowledge that this event was a tragedy. As a shia we always believe in the prophet first but we have to have respect and following imam ali. We ow the difference between an Imaam and a Prophet
@@saminagulzar8622 Yes i acknowledge that this event was a tragedy but that doesn't means we should mourn....if mourning is the best solution for this tragedy then show me any authentic hadees so that we could rectify ourselves...
@@anonymous05222 do you need a hadees to show you how to mourn. To feel sadness when a family member or a friend dies. What is you natural feeling. What is your natural instinct. And then think without any thought our Holy Prophet Mohamamd (SAW) his daughters son ..his grandson and family were killed. How can anyone not feel sadness for that.
My cat had 2 kittens that died and I cried for 2 days. And felt so upset when I saw her my cat and even she cried ..she meowed for 2 days for her babies..
If you mean why do shia have majalis and mourn. Then the simple answer to that is to remember that imam Hussain sacrificed himself for islam.
We dont believe that he or imam Ali were Prophets. The Rasul was the last Prophet. We all believe that.
@@saminagulzar8622 I don't want any hadees for how to mourn....but i want answer why u people mourn like ********.....and u know there is a authentic hadees which says if a member of a family dies then u should mourn only for 3 days except wife.....and u people mourn for couple of months.....
YA ALI MADAD
Interesting introduction. I hope no flame wars erupt here, and amicable discussions are abound, but I always wonder: how many narratives of the same event exist that we can readily study, and how often do they conflict with each other? Nonetheless, ignorance of facts is rarely bliss in a discussion, and I am glad that I feel inspired to learn a bit more then what I assumed I would have already learnt before. Thanks Khan Academy for diversifying to such interesting topics!
This was an introduction for me to the shia/sunni difference. I'm thinking one thing though. What would Mohammed think if he knew all his children and grandchildren would be murdered over his legacy by his followers within 50 years of his death?
He already knew about it when he was alive. He was given the prophecy when he was alive by Angel Jibreel.
@@shakeerhussain9366 was that maybe why he named somebody not of his own bloodline as his successor? To prevent the prophecy from coming out? Although it had exactly that effect?
@@haribo836 watch previous part of this video
Muhammad weeped by hearing the event of karbala by jibrail..
If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt does it matter what the 3 caliphs did ? At the end of the day none of them were prophets and none were perfect. The 3 caliphs expanded Islam and contributed greatly to the religion. Were they perfect? No. The whole shia divide is over a political statement. Shia's equate the Prophet' grandchildren to the other Prophets mentioned in the Quran. What happened to them was a tradegy but they weren't Prophets HOWEVER shias treat them as such
Hassan was poisoned
@Faster Hard House he was poisoned
@Faster Hard House yes by his wife
hassan who?
you
or hassan my friends son??
pay respect for noble people!!!
@@baraslim imam hassan as son of imam ali as
We know that.
Why and by whom?
Ya Hussain
Ya Allah ...
LA ILAHA ILLALLAH
MUHAMMAD RASOOLULLAH.
THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLAH
MUHAMMAD IS HIS RASOOL.
LA HAULA WALA KUWWATA ILLA BILLA.
NO ONE HAS THE POWER OVER ANYTHING ACCEPT ALLAH..
ALLAH SE MAANGO OR KISISE NAHI..
@@mdajis1070 Ya Allah Ya Rasoolallah (SAWW) Ya Ali Mola (A.S) 💕❤️
Here we go! If one read this flowchart honestly he would get to know our(shia's) 6th leader is Imam Jaffar Sadiq (who was teacher of imam bukhari and Jaber the chemistry's father) , their 6th leader is yazeed.
Muslims follow Quran + Sunna according to "Sahi Hadith"
Proud to be a Muslim.
Make sense..if i choose to follow the tragedies in Islam, there must be many more tradition exist. My opinion is, the tragedy must be remembered as reminder, how costly the fight to Islam unity & brotherhood. I must say that i will take it as lesson that Islam community must unite. The problem is when the followers is become extreme to follow certain leaders. Leadership is not inherited. Anybody may have this character. There should be only type of Muslim, as Muslim must follow the same teaching from Prophet Muhammad SAW (peace be upon him)
in the event of ghadeer khumm,
the prophet SAWS said that after him they should on to 2 weighty ropes which is 1) the Quran and 2) the ahlul bayt. u should be able to find this in sahih muslim, its called hadith al thaqulayn (i dont think i spelt it right).
ahlul bayt are of 14 members which are the prophet himself, his daughter fatima and the 12 imams.
So Glad I Stumbled Upon This Great-Chanel...
I've Been Going Thru Videos For 8 Hours Straight Thus-Far...
..&.. I When One Makes Learning a Fun.&.Entertaining Undertaking...
..``Edutainment/Entercation´´..!!
👌👌💯
your missing so much things about shia
My mother is shia and my father Sunni, each of them wanted me to become „one of them“. I did not want them to argue over me so I told them I don’t want to do anything with islam. But at some point Allah SWT guided me to the right path alhamdulilah so I had to check both sides. I have to admit that for me the shia side has a lot of logical flaws which I will state here. Also I had the feeling that they pick verses out of context and interpret them as they like. Maybe some shia brother can answer my questions.
1) Shias are interpreting riba as usary and not interest. So it is halal to take and give interest. This is the number one reasons why I could not become shia. There is no doubt that interest is the cause of all economical problems (even if interest is only 1%). You can check this out everywhere, it is FACT! Gods economic system is zakat! The best form of tax. So if a believe has one mistake, I can’t believe that it comes from god. Sunnis reject any form of interest
2) Khums: Shias say you have to pay 1/5th of your yearly income as a form of tax. To me this is flawed exactly like our current system and stands in contrast to zakat! I don’t know any shia who is paying the khums. The Quran says it won’t make us do something which is too hard for us to do. The Sunni view is that khums is only for war times. The surah in the quran where khums is mentioned is clearly talking about war times and no where else in the Quran is khums mentioned!
3) Marriage just for a period of time
Go to the father and mother of a shia girl and ask them if they are alright with marrying their daughter for a set period. Again most of them don’t like it.
4) I don’t believe our prophet peace be upon him chose Ali as the second caliph. The reason for my opinion is that if he would have done so, every Muslim leader in the future would have put his son as his successor. Making the caliphate a kingship. We all want to follow the prophet and this would have been the best excuse. We condemn Muawiya for putting Yazid as his successor instead voting, but with appointing Ali as the second caliph we would have given him the perfect justification to do so! The way the first 4 caliphs were chosen/voted is a perfect for of democracy. Let the most knowledgeable and god fearing/ most suited be caliph.
If Allah SWT wanted he would have given our prophet peace be upon him sons himself.
5) Shias accusing Abu Bakr/ Omar for stealing the title of the caliphate doesn’t make sense to me too. Abu Bakr gave up all his wealth and risked his life for the prophet peace be upon him, so why on earth would he risk to go into hell fire by disobeying the order of the prophet? Same goes for Omar
6) Why would Ali give his daughter to Omar as a wife when he stole the title of caliph from him?
7) Why are the other imams all from the lineage of Husayn and not Hassan? Is it because he gave the title of caliph to Muawiya?
8) Are Shias believing that a caliph/Imam has to be someone without sin and of the family of the prophet? What happens if all the successors die and none is left?
These are some of my thoughts in regards to the shia view while researching myself. I couldn’t find anything contradicting in the Sunni view. My objection here is not to offend anyone, just sharing my own experience.
these are things that have bothered me for quite a while. I feel that neither the shia nor the sunni's are totally correct but they each have things that are true that the other side doesn't have. for example, in Bukhari it states that the Prophet used to sometimes join his salat (zuhr + asr, magrib + isha) without any sickness, travel or need. The Shia do this ALL the time but the sunni's are against it. But thats not what the Prophet did. The Shia also don't pray tarawih, but according to sunni sources the Prophet discouraged the gathering of musali's during Ramadan after Isha as it would likely become a burden on the Ummah. I feel the Shia belief more accurately reflects the practice and teaching of the Prophet in this regard, more so than the sunni's. There are other things also, but for the shia, they pray on clay stones. The prophet and his companions didn't do this so this is a CLEAR innnovation. The sunni's call the Azan correctly and the Shia have added to the azan what wasn't present during the life of the Prophet. So as I said before, I feel the truth lies somewhere in the middle and neither side is 100% correct.
lol injecting democracy was good the thing is who choose those voters to vote? :))) have a trip to QOM city in IRAN and figure these things out i know they have some discussion centers there and some people who know shia the best if u have any question
@@KingKong-me1pk go away and if you believe evil with all its instruments will triumph, you are on the losing side. G-d is Good and is the G-d of the Good, not of the wicked and those who serve it.
wrote a long passage but then deleted it. you have to open some books and read it yourself also you will have to read the same incident narrations from different scholars/historian to figure it out. What all 8 points I see above
only shows that you have read too less and your opinion is easily swayed by other's advices instead of focusing on facts.As for the 4th point tell me can a strong wealthy man not buy votes in democracy. It even happens in present time. The caliphate was much more than being just the leader of land and army which people don't understand.
Hazrat ali didn't give any daughter to umar..
Don't blame brother..
I advise all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth.
Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
Shia is actual and accurate islam..
There is a huge difference between the religion of Muawiya and the people of Sakifa and the religion of Muhammad and Al Muhammad..
Th event that take place after the Ali becomes the caliph are too complicated to be put in a 10 min video . But you put a nice effort 👍🏼
Your simple and clarity explanation cleared all my doubts about shia and sunny muslims and know about great prophet Mohamed family .
Thanks for this series, helps me FINALLY understand the divide between the two sects.
theomnipresent1 ruclips.net/video/SAfUGTk55ME/видео.html here's a video that can help you to understand the real story
if you want to stop divide, learn what shiasm truely is with out taqiyah, shiasm is a jewish made faith by ibn saba who said Ali is god and started wars, similar to how crypto jew paul said JEsus is god & started wars!
This is a very biased view from the point of view of sunnis.
Correction, The first civil war didn't start in 4th caliph era, It started in 3rd's, as mob surrounded his capital and killed him.
Yet again Shiite information is false or is wrongly interpreted, quite possibly because it is taken from non-shias. Would you learn about the Catholic faith from a Protestant or a Catholic? Please read books such as Nahjul Balagha, which is a compilation of the letters and sermons of Imam Ali. It gives a lot of historical context necessary to understand the complicated era.
timtima19 Although I highly appreciate teachings and sayings of Imam Ali, much of today's shia doctrine is İranian Propaganda against Arabs/Sunnis. İranians have made Gods out of Humans, and they worship Ahlu-Bayt like idol worshipers. True Shias of Imam are Sunnis.
They want ibl Saba lol
if you want to stop divide, learn what shiasm truely is with out taqiyah, shiasm is a jewish made faith by ibn saba who said Ali is god and started wars, similar to how crypto jew paul said JEsus is god & started wars!
Is imam Ali, Mohammeds cousin and son in law?
I want to study those... Where can i find them..
I am not a shia nor a sunni. I am a muslim and it was humans who went away from the actual path which is to spread the light of Islam.
Good visuals timeline and maps ..makes understanding much easier xx
You see what happened by not chosing Ali ( the rightly guided) as true first calif .....This anarchy rose up because when Holy Prophet SAWW died and the people who only want to be kings or califs chose themselves as kalifs before last ceremony of Holy Prophet in a meeting when Ali was preparing for the last ceremony of Holy Prophet.
You gave excellent and true information by best way , you are very good explainer
A lot of people in the comment are whining about "this is historically inaccurate, you should have studied the Sunni" while he has stated multiple times that THIS IS ACCORDING TO SHIA TRADITION!!! At the end of the day, he doesn't care to spread a religious message, but to talk about the history from a point of view not many people know about.
With all due respect, Sir. You’re missing a lot. Please research more. There’s more than just the “Ghadeer Khum” proclamation that you cited. For example the Verse that was revealed right before the proclamation which nullifies his Prophethood if he fails to proclaim what has been commanded, and the verse of Completion/Perfection was revealed right after the proclamation of Hazrat Ali, and there was a Pledge of Allegiance by the present Companions (including AbuBakr,Umar,Uthman) to Ali after the proclamation. The Hadith of 12 Imams/Caliphs after the Prophet, Hadith of Ahlulbayt (Kissa) and the Verse of Purification. Remember Hadiths have corresponding Qur’anic revelations. And bear in mind that the word of the Prophet is the word of GOD. Obedience to him is obedience to GOD. Whatever he says is a commandment from GOD. Also, you have to take into consideration how GOD reprimanded Aisha in the Quran because of the Battle of the Camel. Consider also the Hadiths and verse which require us to follow and love the Purified Ahlulbayt. And so on and so forth. You can find these hadiths in both Sunni and Shia books.
Indeed it all started from Gadheer Khum
Al-Baqarah 2:134
تِلْكَ أُمَّةٌ قَدْ خَلَتْۖ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتْ وَلَكُم مَّا كَسَبْتُمْۖ وَلَا تُسْـَٔلُونَ عَمَّا كَانُوا۟ يَعْمَلُونَ
That was a nation which has passed on. It will have [the consequence of] what it earned, and you will have what you have earned. And you will not be asked about what they used to do.
Al-Hashr 59:10
وَٱلَّذِينَ جَآءُو مِنۢ بَعْدِهِمْ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا ٱغْفِرْ لَنَا وَلِإِخْوَٰنِنَا ٱلَّذِينَ سَبَقُونَا بِٱلْإِيمَٰنِ وَلَا تَجْعَلْ فِى قُلُوبِنَا غِلًّا لِّلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ رَبَّنَآ إِنَّكَ رَءُوفٌ رَّحِيمٌ
And [there is a share for] those who came after them, saying, "Our Lord, forgive us and our brothers who preceded us in faith and put not in our hearts [any] resentment toward those who have believed. Our Lord, indeed You are Kind and Merciful."
I wonder why a true follower of the prophet Muhammad SAW will not heed to these verses because Allah having knowledge of what happened, is happening and will happen has precautioned us so that we don't erase our scanty good deeds by slandering the noble companions of the holy prophet Muhammad SAW, who were praised by Allah in the Quran and by the prophet Muhammad SAW himself in several authentic ahadith, thus should we think they did something wrong we also atimes err and never were they angels, majority of the companions followed them, Islam triumphed in their hands Ali was in good terms with all of them and supported them in their respective terms of office and prayed with them. So what at all is our problem...Yaa Allah guide the community of Muhammad SAW upon what is best for them, Aameen..Jazaakumullah khayran and forgive me if my comments hurt anyone Wassalamu Alaikum.
First of all, many thanks to your non bias approach it really allows for a seeker of truth to make a just approach to the information given !!! Subscribed !!!
It's weird how this is supposed to be a comparison of the 2 divisions but your narrative is just the Sunni version.
@@Yassinekamp No its not, its a Sunni narrative compiled AFTER the fact the events took place and Sunni historians wrote about it.
@@sidreb7642 Ok, Shia's do not accept Ali as the next successor SIMPLY because he is family, it is because the Prophet ANNOUNCED him at the day of Ghadeer Khumm. Him being family of the Prophet simply follows the theme of Allah choosing lineages such as Prophet Ibrahim and his son, Prophet Mosus and his brother Aaron, etc.
@@sidreb7642 Abu Bakr disobeyed the Prophet by not joining Usama bin Zayds army, all while the Prophet was sick. Now let me ask you, when the Prophet was sick and wanted to write a will to prevent the Ummah from being misguided, who was the one to stop him? And what name was the Prophet called?
@@sidreb7642 I did, read again. Maybe you are not familiar with the History of the prayer story, and how the Prophet was mad at Abu Bakr and Umar for trying to lead it. This was during the time he ordered them to join Usama's army.
@@sidreb7642 This is the narration you are referring to:
Narrated 'Aisha: When the Prophet, became ill in his fatal illness, someone came to inform him about the prayer, and the Prophet told him to tell Abu Bakr to lead the people in the prayer. I said, "Abu Bakr is a soft-hearted man and if he stands for the prayer in your place, he would weep and would not be able to recite the Qur'an." The Prophet said, "Tell Abu Bakr to lead the prayer." I said the same as before. He (repeated the same order and) on the third or the fourth time he said, "You are the companions of Joseph. Tell Abu Bakr to lead the prayer." So Abu Bakr led the prayer and meanwhile the Prophet felt better and came out with the help of two men; as if I see him just now dragging his feet on the ground. When Abu Bakr saw him, he tried to retreat but the Prophet beckoned him to carry on. Abu Bakr retreated a bit and the Prophet sat on his (left) side. Abu Bakr was repeating the Takbir (Allahu Akbar) of Allah's Apostle for the people to hear.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 11, Number 680-681
The question:
If the prophet peace be upon him and his pure family was the one who ordered Abu Bakr to lead the prayer, then why did he later go to the mosque “dragging his feet on the ground” while he was experiencing his “fatal illness” and lead the prayer himself while sitting down? This is the only time in history someone has led a prayer while sitting. This proves that once the prophet realised the plot of Aisha, he became very angry describing Aisha and Hafsa as “the companions of Joseph” and with his “fatal illness” he decided to go to the mosque to prevent what others now claim.
This was the reply of the brother to you:
Narrated Ibn Umar: Allah's Apostle appointed Usama bin Zaid as the commander of some people. Those people criticised his leadership. The Prophet said, "If you speak ill of his leadership, you have already spoken ill of his father's leadership before. By Allah, he deserved to be a Commander, and he was one of the most beloved persons to me and now this (i.e. Usama) is one of the most beloved persons to me after him.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 552
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 744-745
This Abu Bakr and Umar were supposed to be under the leadership of Usama instead they critisized it and left it to plot their coup. Aisha may Allah curse her wanted her father to be leader as well so she said the lie:
Narrated Al-Aswad: It was mentioned in the presence of 'Aisha that the Prophet had appointed 'Ali as successor by will. Thereupon she said, "Who said so? I saw the Prophet, while I was supporting him against my chest. He asked for a tray, and then fell on one side and expired, and I did not feel it. So how (do the people say) he appointed 'Ali as his successor?"
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 736
Just a note, the Holy Prophet peace be upon him and his pure family passed on the chest of Ali peace be upon him and this is narrated in your books.
Regarding the video description, the definition of fitnah is not civil war. It has multiple meanings but the most comprehensible one would be a "trial" or "test". It's best to remove the word fitnah from the description.
A A In modern Malay, Fitnah borrowed from the Arabic Fitna, it means Slander.
In the quran brothers and sister it say if two groups of muslim fight in the name of allh, it is then a fitna
bro fitnah has muliple meanings, it could mean a test or trail it could mean causing trouble
آپ نے بہت اچھا ایکسٹریم کیا ہے
You should put Islamic history and faith together so these events make more sense
Abu bakr killed Fatimah prophets daughter
What the heck? You crazy fool. What are you talking about? You guys are brainwashed to hate good people for no reason. Woe to those who hate the good companions of Prophet saw
Amr ibn Al-‘As reported: I said, “Which person is most beloved to you?” The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Aisha.” I said, “I mean among men.” The Prophet said, “Her father.” I said, “Then who?” The Prophet said, “Umar ibn al-Khattab,” and he mentioned some other men.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3462, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2384
Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authentic) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim
عن عَمرو بْن الْعَاصِ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قُلْتُ أَيُّ النَّاسِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ النَّبِي صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَائِشَةُ فَقُلْتُ مِنْ الرِّجَالِ فَقَالَ أَبُوهَا قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ ثُمَّ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ فَعَدَّ رِجَالًا
3462 صحيح البخاري كتاب فضائل الصحابة باب قول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لو كنت متخذا خليلا
2384 صحيح مسلم كتاب فضائل الصحابة باب من فضائل أبي بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه
@@farruhismoilov7496 Yes he asked 'person'. Hassan, Hussain, Ali Fatima were no normal humans. The greatest of mankind.
@@alienguy-kazmikompany1286 the greatest of mankind were prophets then come the sahabas
@@farruhismoilov7496,,
I advisey all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth.
Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
I am Athiest Hindu and I support Shiva Islam
Nice work very informative 💯
I'm Sunni but i love my Shia bro and sis
Thanks for explaining this. As someone that likes history I always wondered what led to this schism, because apparently that still influences the middle-east geopolitics. By looking at the comments I saw that this is a very debatable subject. You guys should do a video about the political implications of this schism in the recent history
5:50 According to Shia sources, the story of denouncement of Ali(AS) goes like this:
They agree to send delegates from each side to denounce their own leaders. Ali's delegate denounces him, while Muawiyya's delegate, Amru Ibn Al-As, considered one of the trickiest politicians of his time, betrays the treaty:
"I, as I remove my ring from my finger, *[Removes Ring]* denounce *Ali* as the Caliph"
I am Sunni and I Said Ali R.A was right in those wars ...Muawiya was wrong and He did many Mistakes including introducing Kingship in his Own Family ...Islam early caliphate was based on Election and advises between the Muslims leaders and Chose a Competent Leader and it did not go in to family ....And Muaviya decision change the face of Islamic Ruling from electoral to kingship
If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
See the patience of prophet family, what happened after Prophet Muhammad.
Imam Hussain had sacrifice his family including 6 month son to protect the actual Din.
Ali was known for his knowledge, his justice, bravery, loyalty etc etc........no one can match him, neither in the period of Muhammad life nor after the death of Muhammad. He was the true seccessor and the most deserved Caliph.
im an east asian christian and this is pretty interesting stuff
I'm not Muslim but I can 100% understand and sport Shias. Why are the Shias are 10% of muslims? I think because everyone says Shias are not muslims and that's make it easy to hate them and don't understand their words and believes
Thank you very much
Missed soo many crucial points.
Like many in the west, I know very little about Islam, so thank you for this video. It sounds like there was a lot of infighting over political power in the early days. It also sounds like the Shia have a strong reason to feel like Ali got seriously ripped off-- first on Muhammad's death, and then in the killing of his descendants. My question is why is there such conflict between Sunni and Shia today? Are there major *doctrinal* differences in their views on God/Allah, or how Muslims should live?
My personal view is that a) it's a tragedy-- and an insult to the Creator-- for his children to kill each other over their beliefs, and b) this killing is a far greater crime than worshipping the "wrong way." But this seems like an even bigger tragedy if the core reason Sunni and Shia fight and kill each other is over the actions of power-hungry leaders hundreds of years ago. Thank you for any answers here-- I'm asking in good faith.
Joe Colletti Allah (god) has closed off the chapter of prophecy with the last prophet, Muhammad pbuh. That is why it is meant for the prophet Muhammad’s relatives to pass away and not lead and rule.
This was a very good video. There are some really important facts missing. Eg. Yazid was not a good character and islam was falling apart.
So Imam Hussain would not pledge allegiance to him .
His family were massacre and the woman imprisoned .
This was the grandson ofbthe Holy Phrophet. How can anyone not acknowledge that this was wrong on so many levels.
Awesome.
I just don’t get one point, why the prophet (pbuh) just didn’t nominate someone before he died?
He was probably busy with more important stuff ig
Thank you You explained very well
It’s crazy that the golden Age was able to rise out of all this political turmoil
As a sunni, we fast when the Kerbala days come, and we try to drink as little water as possible on those days
amazing that this man knows more history than probably half of our own sunni and shia brothers. I want to try to make a logical statement and I don't want to argue too much with the brothers but doesn't it make sense that god would leave a successor after our beloved prophet (S.A.W.S) to protect the message of our beloved messenger? If god didn't leave an appointed successor, do you not think that the message would have been altered like the message of our previous beloved prophets e.g Isa (Jesus). Now think this through, Allah the all knowing would know that if he did not appoint a successor the message will change like the message of Isa (A.S), so what does he do, the all knowing Allah knows that on the prophets last miraj, he will need to appoint a successor to prevent the message from being altered, so what does he do? he decides to appoint a leader from among the muslims, Allah decides the person most suitable to carry along the true message of Islam, who would be Ali ibn Abu Talib. The man who was born in the cleanest place (Kaaba), spent the most time with the prophet, was there with the messenger of allah the most out of all the sahabas, married to one of the purest of women (Fatima (A.S)) the prophets daughter. Was it all a coincedence?, or was it all of allahs plan? Ill end it with this. surah 8 verse 30
( when the faithless plotted against you to take you captive, they plotted and allah devised and allah is the best of devisers).
no matter how many times the enemies of allah try to destroy Islam, true Islam will never perish but true islam will be practiced by few percentage of people. Dont spread hatred and remembet the time will come when Isa (A.S) and imam mehdi will bring the truth to the world. Be vary of the day oh fellow muslims, be prepared. Salam alleykum.
Ali Reza Shukri mashallah brother ameen
No, it doesn't really make sense.
As an academic, there are certain points that you have stated incorrectly. Ali ibne Abu Talib's followers did not instigate the war against Ayesha. Ayesha lead a force against Ali. His son, Hasan was poisoned by Mowavia. There many smaller points, but the point that is very important. The Shia belief is that as Mohummad was the "Prophet", "Rasool by divine right so the successor of Mohummad is also a divine choice. That is the key contention. The Shia believe that Mohummad did not decide who his successor was, he announced what was the Divine anointment at Ghadeer-e-Khum. Thank you for your hard work.
I was only confused between this shia Muslim debate thanks sir for clearing this confusion. Now I came to know that there is nothing but hate politics between shias and muslims. I am a Sunni and I love shias.
🤔🙄Shias and Muslims?? Thank you sir pretend once again Shias are not muslims and is easy to heat them.
Thank you.
Interesting story!
Hello, may I ask if there is still a Caliph for modern Sunnis and Shias or is Caliphate system ended centuries ago???
Can anyone specifically a Shia person explain why Ali was hesitant to bring the murderer of Osman to justice? Osman was a friend of prophet and among the 10 persons granted paradise while alive same as Ali.. How come Ali didn't stand for his murdered friend who happened to be the Islamic ruler?
The problem is that that Ali (r) was not elected to the position of Khalif, that is why problem started.... Ali didn't move the capital to the Kufa, rather Ali moved there, after he was not elected. As in Kufa he had supporters.
Maviya yazid are the son of dajjal
Amazing explanation
actually not Hazrat Ali (R.A) followers its was mushrakeen role to provoke fight.
well done!
Also the Sharjah enclaves like Khalba, Khorfakkan, Dibba
somethings happened 1300 years ago and people still killing each other.
There's a small number of hateful people from every group, but the vast majority of Muslims in each Islamic sect are peaceful.
@@mclovinjr9086 Yes except for the Hanbali Madhab.
@67 Mohd Salique i didn't mean the whole Hanbali madhab, just the salafi/wahhabi ones.
This is why democracy is most important. And why hindering the integrity of voting is a major issue America is suffering from today.
The calif of the United States is stepping outside its boundaries and must be humbled.
We may differ in a few matters, but our differences are only limited to discussion or debate which can be resolved, not a conflict or hatred, and our differences were merely a political dispute and should not be a theological dispute. Despite this, our ancestors remained united under one umbrella [i.e. Islam] and they shared the same Aqidah because of the Qur'an and the teachings of our Beloved Prophet (ﷺ). We too can unite. ❤️
I understand that your trying to keep the history close to what it says in the books, but I believe that you should reach out to get a little more knowledge about the conflict since history is written by the victors.
Allah made Sunni's the victors because they were on the truth
Omar Omar ma man. Don’t need to be a bigot. Yazid was a Sunni that killed the prophets family. Ur a wahbi. Wallah just stop. We are all Muslims. We have to respect eachother. We both have pillars and worship Allah. Stop being so closed minded. Yazid was a disgrace to Muslims. Sunnis agree to it as well. Just stop being a troll pls and grow up honestly. Reading ur comments disgust me.
@@kingkatiin2658 According to that logic Allah made the Shias victors in Syria because the Shias are on the Truth.
@@007VitaminD Shia's hold absolutely 0 holy sites. And they're not victors in Syria Assad is not Shia he's a different sect
@@kingkatiin2658 What are you talking about? Our holy sites are different from yours. We include the grave sites of the Great Imams while you reject them. We are only 10% yet control all of Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and now Syria and Yemen. Your numbers have weakened your leadership, just like in history you never had a strong leadership system.
To be clear, those people in Ali's army who provoked each battle were what later became the the Khawarij. Also the killers of Uthman (ra) were in the army of Ali (ra). They didn't want to be caught.
@Abbas Ali are you mad what are you talking about Hazrat Ayesha (ra) she was one of the beloved wife of Mohammad (PBUH)
@Abbas Ali mind your language how can spread hate and lies about Hazrat Ayesha.
Such disrespectful talk can be threaten your Iman.
@Abbas Ali
the one who kill hz aisha camel was hz muhammad ibn abi bakr
another adopted sons
not muhammad al hanafiyah
he also escorted her (hz aisha) back to madina with respect from amirul mukminin order
he (amirul mukminin) choose hz muhamnad ibn abi bakr
becouse of blood line
and this is how he (amurul mukminin) pay respect for hz aisha
@@Yassinekamp
are you kidding me???
till today
no clear evidence who was the killer of hz uthman
some say A, B or C
but all never been accepted in both sunni shia scholar
house of hz uthman was be besieged for more 2month
and no help from his cousin, the governor of syam...
is that another joke right?
and hz ali and his family was protetcting hz uthman house...
and you believe the story they (hz uthman killer) join hz ali army???
the story was made to justify the REVOLT againt true Amir
Muawiya was the governor under Uthman and he didn't let the army save Uthman. The revenge of Uthman was just a political game by Ayesha and Muawiya.
5:12 Ali did accept to give up his position as leader, but was re-elected. By this point his original followers did not like him because he had accepted the fair election. I wish Sal corrected this.
I am Sunni Syed. To be honest, the truth is in the middle of both Shia and Sunni versions. Both are at extremes. If you read different versions of history and think critically then both just want to justify anything they heard; however, the reality is in the middle. Allah will ask us, you had my Quran. We have the responsibility to use our minds which is a gift from Allah and find the truth. Don't believe what are you born with, search for the truth why Allah sent us here. It is very easy to tell others non-muslim and consider yourself/your-beliefs perfect without any struggle.
I advise all sunni brothers that don't listen you your molvees, they will not tell you the truth.
Study uour own books, you will get right path.. If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
When does the religion of peace phase kick in?
There wasn't peace. It isn't the religion of peace that some says. The Quran said to defend what is right, not to simply surrender. So any petty misconceptions may lead to a bloody war indeed.
I really don't get people who claim to be Muslim and yet are so ignorant about their own religion. Islam doesnt mean peace. It is not a pacifist religion. Islam = surrender to the will of Allah (swt). Salam= peace.
Muslims need to prioritize learning about our religion because it is a requirement.
Just a point of order..carry on
@@er3947 I think the big thing happening nowadays is that a lot of countries are becoming more secular and worrying about being politically correct. People are becoming more materialistic and attached to this donya, as if they will live forever. It is sad.
@Faster Hard House Islam teaches not to attack others unless attacked first. Just because people back in history were human like the rest of us and fallible, does not change Islam's teachings.
@@Jen-dk7ct Islam teaches (not the meaning of the word 'islam'), I mean teachings in Quran & hadith, not to attack others unless they attack you first.
Nice presentation, some in-accurate statements, Ali’s army being over zealous and the aggressor is an heinous statement and false. Ali pleaded before the fight to stop the war in Jamal and buried his opponents and had a funeral for them. The war in siffen, the war was won by Ali, yet he stopped it when Mauwiya camp said let’s have a peace treaty which was bogus but saved Mauwiya’s skin.
After these wars and another one against the khawaraj, they (khawaraj) were the over zealous ones and broke away from Imam Ali for having a peace treaty and ended up fighting Ali. In 3.5 years of Ali ‘Caliphate’ he fought three wars, for this reason his son Hasan (as) didn’t want to enter a 4th war and negotiated a peace treaty. Peace treaty isn’t giving in, this type of peace treaty was done with the Prophet Mohammed (s) from a position of strength and not weakness. Also keep in mind Mauwiya and Yazid were sons of Abu Sufyan and Hind (staunch enemies from Islam and only converted to Islam after defeat and not to be outcast in Arabia.
Y would people think Muhammed would ever want his family attacked, and such violence to spread after his death between the people he cared about most? Prophets are supposed to be special people and u don't just pass down control if he was truly the one why wouldn't they just follow his teachings and leave it at that? Is there no form of Islam that just stops at Muhammed and doesn't get involved with what seems to be pure politics and just try to live based on the teaching of their actual prophet and nobody else?
Who conquered Syria, Iraq and Persia? Umar bin Khattab (Sunni)
Who has conquered the country of Sindi, India and the countries around the oxus river (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan.)? Muhammad bin Al-Qasim (Sunni)
Who is expanding North Africa? Qutaibah bin Muslim Al-Bahily (Sunni)
Who conquered Andalusia? Tariq bin Ziyad (Sunni) and Musa bin Nushair (Sunni)
Who was the conqueror of Konstantinovel? Muhammad Al-Fatih (Sunni)
Who conquered Sicily? Asad bin Al-Furaat (Sunni)
Who created civilization in Andalusia and made it a center of knowledge? The second Umawiyyah caliphs (Ahlus Sunnah)
Who was the Commander in Chief of the Muslims in the Battle of Hittin? Saladin Al-Ayyuby (Sunni)
Who led the Muslims in the battle of A'in Jalut and defeated the Tatars? Saifuddin Qutz (Sunni) and Ruknuddin Baibars (Sunni)
Who managed to break the arrogance of Spain in Morocco? Abdul Karim Al-Khattaby (Sunni)
Who forced Italy to leave Libya? Umar Al-Mukhtar (Sunni)
Then what is the Shia merit
Who had betrayed Al-Husein, persuaded him to come out to kufah and then defected from him in karbala? Al-Mukhtar As-saqafi (Shia)
Who betrayed the Abbasid caliph Al-Radhi billah in front of the Mongols? The Buwaihy (Shia)
Who paved the way for the Tatars to enter Baghdad? Ibn Al-Alqamy (Shia)
Who considered Hulagu Khan's actions good? Naseer Ath-Thusy (Shia)
Who helped the Tatars in their invasion of Syria? (Shia)
Who is allied with France against the Muslims? Fatimid State (Shia)
Who betrayed the Sultanate of the Seljuk? Tugril Bek al-Basasiri (Shia)
Who helped the crosses to control Baitul Maqdis? Ahmad bin Atha (Shia)
Who masterminded the murder of Sulthan Saladin Al-Ayyuby? Kanzud daulah (Shia)
Who welcomed Hulagu Khan to Syria? Kamaluddin bin badr Ath-Taflisy (Shia)
Who stole the Hajar Aswad and slaughtered the pilgrims at the Masjid al-Haram? Abu Thahir Al-Qarmathy (Shia)
Who helped Napoleon Bonaparte in his attack on Sham? (Shia)
And now,
Who stands with the Basyar
This video was not good, you minimized the Sunni shia split to just some political squabble and not a religious issue.
My question is for everyone..Why did division happen in Islam..who did it and when??
Plz elaborate
Ali un wali Ullah (a.s) ❤️
Just to clear one point. Sunnis also view Yazid as a bad ruler. What he did was horrible regardless of the identity of his victims. Also Muawiya should have listened and plead allegiance to Ali as the 4th caliph. He was too blinded by his desire of revenging Uthman.
If first 3 caliphs was on right path,
Then why abu bakr made injustice on the daughter of muhammad??
Why he burned the door of fatima??
Why he take the fidakk of fatima??
Why umar did not let the muhammad to write something, at last moment of Muhammad , in order to protect from fittnah??
Why fatima did not talk to the three caliph till death???
@@ShiaNoorAhlBayt Bring me authentic Hadiths to support your claims. All you will find is shia fabricated talk with weak or no chains of narrations. Fatima died six months after the prophet pbuh died. So literally, she died more than 1 year before Abu bakr died and you're telling me she did not talk to the 3 caliphs ??? She didn't even know who will become Caliph next. Also, why does she need to talk to them? None of them were her Mahram (blood related, brother, father, son), so she's not supposed to be around them. Please step outside of your Shia bubble and research the truth. The Shia went way too far in their delusions.
@@osumanaaa9982,,
Bro, You asked me, therefore i searched the books and giving reference, so, first confirm and accept reality..
I was sunni,
But now, i am alhamdulillah shia based on 5 year of research..
Syeda fatima didn't talk with abu bakr, umar and usman till shahadatt.
She was known about them because they did not give the hazrat ali his right,,
On the occarion of bayyatt,
Hazrat umar burned the door of fatima sa, and the burning door fell over her ribs and her coming son(those name comes as Mohsin in books) killed..
Fatima zehra was seriously injured and this became the reason of her death,,
She told hazrat ali don't let them to participate in her funeral...
All these are present in authentic books of both shia and sunni..
Sunni reference:
Sahi bukhari, jild2,page675.
Sahi bukhari jild 2,page 455.
Sahi muslim, jild 1,page 94.
Musanif ibn e abi shaiba, jild8, page 572..
These some parts are also present in sahi bukhri..
Shia reference:
Book usul kafi, by syed ibn e tawoos,
Jild 5, page 465,
Malla yahzarul faqeeh,
Jild 7page 112,
Allama majlisi books 4,6..
And also written in other books of shia..
She was martyred by abu bakr..
I hope that you will study and get reality,,
Sunni molvees don't tell the actual realities.. So,
Study islam by own study,,
Well, Aisha and Ali had compromised. But the third party [the enemy of Islam] attacked on both of the parties.
The people who attacked on Ali's party were speaking the slogans that they're the people of Aisha.
And the people who attacked Aisha's party were speaking the slogans that they're the people of Ali.
I am Shia Ali the warrior Hassan the chosen one hussain the savior of Islam
Do sayyids exist in Shia and Sunni as well, what's the difference between them ?
Nice religion! :D
Im not Muslim I am just trying to learn about this topic right now, and I am a little confused on one thing (I doubt anyone will repspond to me since this is 2021). If Shias believed that descendants of Muhammed should be the next leaders of the Muslim community, then why did they want Ali to be the leader even though he was Muhammed's son in law, which means means he is not related to him?
they are related, Ali was Prophet Muhammads cousin!
That hassan peace treaty of electing is not true.
The deal was that after him (muawiya) the caliphate goes to him (Hassan) unless if he aint alive then it goes to Hussain.
haha...
you think the grand son of prophet saww desire power???
he (hz hassan) was elected
not take of power
and never make treaty becouse he desire power
when muawiya passed away
the caliph will back to ummah!!!
that is the treaty
Talha Gaming no, in the peace treaty, one of the conditions was that the caliphate would go to Hassan, unless, if he wasnt alive, to Hussain.
Thanks alot brother