Biblical Family Tree

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • Buy the chart:
    usefulcharts.c...
    Watch the extended version, with academic commentary:
    • Biblical Genealogy (Fu...
    CREDITS:
    Chart by Matt Baker
    Animation by Syawish Rehman
    Audio editing by Ali Shahwaiz
    Theme music: “Lord of the Land” by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com

Комментарии • 6 тыс.

  • @UsefulCharts
    @UsefulCharts  Год назад +372

    Buy the chart: usefulcharts.com/products/biblical-family-tree
    Watch the extended version with academic commentary: ruclips.net/video/iD7kWTV3mtE/видео.html

    • @nixgaming4505
      @nixgaming4505 Год назад +13

      🙂

    • @elmajraz6019
      @elmajraz6019 Год назад +25

      On the Jewish side, Noah born, then Seth born? I think you meant Shem born.

    • @chimera9818
      @chimera9818 Год назад +11

      You could make video about the claims to the house of David today and who would be the king of Israel if we go by dynasty

    • @elmajraz6019
      @elmajraz6019 Год назад +3

      @@chimera9818 you mean, if Jeconiah and his descendants was not cursed by prophet Jeremiah.

    • @desta4383
      @desta4383 Год назад +3

      You forgot Miriam

  • @missannthrope365
    @missannthrope365 Год назад +3114

    I have waited over 35 years for this. I’ve tried twice to do this but just got overwhelmed. Thank you so much for your research and presentation.

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB 11 месяцев назад

      Lies again? American Education Squirt Water

    • @-tzadakim-7805
      @-tzadakim-7805 11 месяцев назад +75

      I can’t even imagine doing this

    • @rayhanakram9912
      @rayhanakram9912 11 месяцев назад +21

      what were some of the logistical issues you faced whilst trying to do this

    • @WhirledPublishing
      @WhirledPublishing 11 месяцев назад +32

      Lies, lies and more lies

    • @rayhanakram9912
      @rayhanakram9912 11 месяцев назад +56

      @@WhirledPublishing huh

  • @tnsandrei
    @tnsandrei Год назад +2424

    Herod's family is absolutely ridiculous. Imagine entering his house and calling: "Herod" and everybody turns around including the daughters, the servants and the house animals

    • @pinghpin3
      @pinghpin3 Год назад +42

      Lol true

    • @thomasrinschler6783
      @thomasrinschler6783 Год назад +129

      Eh, that's nothing on the Ptolomies

    • @M4th3u54ndr4d3
      @M4th3u54ndr4d3 Год назад +15

      Lol

    • @katrinareads
      @katrinareads Год назад +217

      At least he doesn't have the same problem as George Forman's house, where the kitchen appliances also turn around.

    • @smorcrux426
      @smorcrux426 Год назад +13

      Most sources I know (I think even Josephus though I'm not 100% sure) don't refer everyone as "herod ___" but just as "___", especially agrippas and agrippas II

  • @user-rd6vf7xk1x
    @user-rd6vf7xk1x 4 месяца назад +201

    I did this when I was a kid, I taped 20 a4 sheets together and drew it out all by hand during my school holidays

    • @taliajones4969
      @taliajones4969 3 месяца назад +15

      wow that’s impressive

    • @laurenmichelle5901
      @laurenmichelle5901 Месяц назад +18

      I wish I knew Jesus when I was a kid. He saved me so many times before I acknowledged Him. Thank God for His mercy and grace.

    • @maylo7835
      @maylo7835 Месяц назад +2

      Well tried!

  • @madelizatoribio6498
    @madelizatoribio6498 4 месяца назад +196

    Overwhelming to realize how long this chart might have taken to complete. It's like a quick reference for those who are studying the bible an wants to understand these events > Kudos. This is a great work.

    • @fishmongal
      @fishmongal 4 месяца назад +2

      I just learned about Judos. But who is Kudos?

    • @lachlanbaker2031
      @lachlanbaker2031 4 месяца назад +4

      @@fishmongal Kudos just means “good work” or something similar in Greek.

    • @kg0311
      @kg0311 3 месяца назад +1

      I'm sure AI could have done it for us

  • @DougVandegrift
    @DougVandegrift Год назад +1843

    The amount of information and knowledge this guy can put in the form of an easy to digest chart astounds me. Bravo! I'm learning more about Biblical history more than I ever did in seminary, and sunday school.

    • @mxmm572
      @mxmm572 Год назад +42

      And yet it's all made up story

    • @daerdevvyl4314
      @daerdevvyl4314 Год назад +59

      M xmm Certainly not all. Anyway, it doesn't harm you for people to have different beliefs.

    • @thefirstdark
      @thefirstdark Год назад

      ​@@mxmm572 Why be a problematic pr*ck? Then again...those who believe in nothing, ARE NOTHING--and shall return to nothingness in their inevitable ends. Put that in your pipe and smoke it; as it seems to comfort you sooooo very much. 👎 😒 😎 !!!

    • @artquezada29
      @artquezada29 Год назад +17

      ​@@daerdevvyl4314it literally does tho it'd influence how they vote.

    • @raztubes
      @raztubes Год назад +10

      Information, tons. Knowledge, zero.

  • @GeneralKato
    @GeneralKato Год назад +307

    From Adam to Noah, the Hebrew names form a few Hebrew sentences:
    1 Adam Man
    2 Seth Appointed
    3. Enosh Mortal
    4. Kenan Sorrow
    5. Mahahlalel The blessed God
    6. Jared Shall come down
    7. Enoch Teaching
    8. Methuselah His death shall bring
    9. Lamech The despairing
    10. Noah Rest, comfort
    If we stitch the word meanings together, it forms the following sentences:
    1. Man appointed mortal sorrow (The fall of man).
    2. The blessed God shall come down teaching (Torah given to Moses)
    3. His death shall bring the despairing rest and comfort (death of Jesus and fulfilment of Matt 11:28-29)

    • @iara_pimenta
      @iara_pimenta 10 месяцев назад +6

      Interesting

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB 10 месяцев назад +2

      Lies again? Tree Bark Hot Weather

    • @StaceyMayer
      @StaceyMayer 10 месяцев назад +6

      Brilliant!

    • @bentramell729
      @bentramell729 10 месяцев назад +1

      Saw this on video "messiah 2030" it's very compelling information for sure

    • @mdl12321
      @mdl12321 10 месяцев назад +13

      So basically first you suffer, then God enters your life, and you find comfort in welcoming rest of death.

  • @TG-nd9rj
    @TG-nd9rj Год назад +790

    My parent's didn't know what they were going to name me til very shortly before my birth, they were in the middle of a bible study and the story of Abraham came up. They thought Terah sounded pretty good (despite the fact he's only mentioned twice in the Bible). 24 years later, here I am watching the breakdown of my namesake's family tree. Interesting times :D

    • @TaraLyz
      @TaraLyz Год назад +34

      Plus, when used as a name, it's usually for a female and spelled like mine. I can't remember how old I was when I figured out my name was used by someone in the Bible-male or not-, but still always thought that was cool.

    • @naomilangevin3944
      @naomilangevin3944 Год назад +42

      I had the same story with my name, Naomi. Mom was reading the Bible and was on Ruth. She couldn't choose Ruth cause Aunt was named Ruth.

    • @myspleenisbursting4825
      @myspleenisbursting4825 Год назад +57

      @@ebogar42 Interesting how so-called open-minded atheists can't respect other people's beliefs

    • @jaefernandez6128
      @jaefernandez6128 Год назад

      All this inbreeding is why real jews have such a narly look and health issues

    • @CupidStunt-fs7ie
      @CupidStunt-fs7ie Год назад +4

      @@ebogar42 D-Bag says what???

  • @BiblicallyDevoted
    @BiblicallyDevoted 2 месяца назад +13

    I seen the title of this video.. I selected this video… listened to the first 10 seconds.. paused this video.. subscribed.. wrote this comment… then resume .. thank you ❤

  • @joshygoldiem_j2799
    @joshygoldiem_j2799 Год назад +407

    FUN FACT: The Mesha Stele was destroyed by the Bedouin because the Ottomans were demanding it over. Thankfully, the archaeologist who found it made an imprint of it, so its writing was preserved. The Stele on display today is actually a reproduction with only a few fragments that archaeologists were able to recover.

    • @Zyxi7
      @Zyxi7 Год назад +9

      I heard that the Bedouin were trying to see if there were precious metals inside of it, throwing it onto the fire and damaging it.

    • @joshygoldiem_j2799
      @joshygoldiem_j2799 Год назад +7

      @Abs who said they were?

    • @Zyxi7
      @Zyxi7 Год назад +4

      @@abs5085 Water is wet. So is milk

    • @daerdevvyl4314
      @daerdevvyl4314 Год назад +1

      Abs Once I was riding a camel very quickly through an oasis with many Bedouin. A police officer stopped me and, gesturing at the oasis with the Bedouin surrounding us, yelled "This is not a race!"

    • @jamesmayle3787
      @jamesmayle3787 Год назад +8

      The Bible is truth.
      To understand this read genesis, Mathew, and one book of the Bible you chose yourself. As you do this practice forgiveness. It's about what's in your heart, love Is the key. If there's love in your heart you forgive. The act proves the truth. To be forgiven we must forgive. Start with your parents, they've loved you, they're easiest. Look inside for the grievances we all build up there and Genuinely forgive from within. It teaches you something you can learn no other ways. You have to learn first hand by what this process does inside your soul. Please trust me. Break down before Jesus Christ and ask for forgiveness today. It's not too late. God loves you. Please trust me.
      Jesus Christ is the way truth and life.

  • @soniadavid7090
    @soniadavid7090 6 месяцев назад +213

    This 35:45 minute video deserves a standing ovation. Thank you for the knowledge I didn't know, existed. This is mind-blowing. Loved the chart and the explanation. Well done!!!

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад +2

      Wrong. He completely skipped the sixth day creations. God said they were good. Read Scripture and stop listening to the traditions of men that are nonsensical.

    • @Elle_Jay52
      @Elle_Jay52 5 месяцев назад +5

      Most couldn't even do a fraction of this so it's still better than nothing and he's only human.... he did a great job!👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

    • @stevepierce6467
      @stevepierce6467 5 месяцев назад +2

      Words actually have meanings; knowledge refers to stuff you can know. Many of the characters mentioned in the bible are symbolic entities meant to teach a lesson, but did not actually exist. Therefore it is impossible to know anything about them. Can we know the blood types, or genealogies, or any sort of knowledge at all about the characters in Harry Potter, or Gone With the Wind?

    • @JohnReece-h9e
      @JohnReece-h9e 3 месяца назад +1

      Göbekli Tepe is a Neolithic archaeological site in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The settlement was inhabited from c. 9500 BCE to at least 8000 BCE, during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic. It is famous for its large circular structures that contain massive stone pillars - among the world's oldest known megaliths.
      It seems that the dates in this video are "out" by some 5000 years
      .

    • @stevepierce6467
      @stevepierce6467 3 месяца назад

      @@JohnReece-h9e More than that; the cave paintings at Lascaux and Altamira date from 25-40,000 years ago. But these proven facts don't mean anything to a true believer. "We know the Truth, don't confuse us with the facts."

  • @brichter4669
    @brichter4669 Год назад +315

    This is by far the best and most comprehensive genealogy chart and explanation of the Biblical generations. I was fascinated as the genealogy story unfolded. Excellent presentation.

    • @MrHavoc1001
      @MrHavoc1001 8 месяцев назад

      Absolutely every bit of this is speculation. There's no way shape or form that you could prove any of this ever happened.

    • @kingkayleb
      @kingkayleb 7 месяцев назад +8

      @@MrHavoc1001 No, but you cant prove anything. But it is evidence, written in historical literature.

    • @Stevie-L-n8g
      @Stevie-L-n8g 7 месяцев назад

      It's not a genealogy chart because it's all made up, so how could it be comprehensive?

    • @normankiraly1816
      @normankiraly1816 7 месяцев назад

      @@kingkayleb The bible is evidence that these are probably stories people believed, not that the stories themselves are true. By your logic, claims by all other religious text s are also true, simply because the books say so, which would contradict with the bible.

    • @kingkayleb
      @kingkayleb 7 месяцев назад +3

      @@normankiraly1816 you just ignored everything I said. I never claimed it was true in my previous comment. I just said it was evidence. Having evidence doesnt prove anything. You cant prove anything

  • @morgandubie
    @morgandubie 4 месяца назад +22

    This is amazing!!!! God bless you for doing this I have tried but never finished :) I am so grateful for this it really helps me visualize everything so much better 💜

  • @MalachiCo0
    @MalachiCo0 Год назад +84

    A couple of things to add to this video.
    1: Christian Literalist dates align with Protestant and Catholic beliefs, because their Torah is basically sourced from the Masoretic (it's a bit more complicated than that, but for the purposes of this discussion it's true). However, the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Churches use the Septuagint (the Greek translation), which on average adds 100 years on the length of time between birth and birth of the child for each of the patriarchs (excluding Noah, Terah, and Abraham onwards). The Samaritans do a mix of the two, using what appear to be mostly Masoretic timelines from before the Flood and mostly Septuagint timelines for after the flood.
    2: In the Septuagint Selah has a son named Cainan, and he is an interesting case study. He does not appear in the Masoretic or Samaritan Torah at all, and the earliest manuscripts of Luke omit him too. I'm not sure what made the Septuagint translators add Cainan on, though there might be a relation to the Book of Jubilees (apocryphal book considered canon to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church), which also has Cainan. Luke's mention is almost certainly either a scribal error (I believe on the older manuscripts there was a name that looked similar on the previous line of text, and the scribe might have accidentally copied his name twice) or was an overcorrect to align it closer to the Septuagint.
    3: It's interesting that the Rabbis came to the conclusion that Exodus 12:40 originally read as "Egypt and Canaan", because that's what some non-denominational Christians have come to conclude using comparative analysis. The Septuagint, older copies of Josephus' body of work, and I believe the Samaritan all say "and Canaan" in those versions.
    4: The Matthew genealogy of Jesus is potentially missing a name, because if you count the names for after the exile you only get 13. Now some think this gives credence to the theory that the Matthew genealogy is properly Mary's. The theory goes that Joseph son of Judah was originally the FATHER of Mary rather than her husband, citing the potential ambiguity of the Greek word used there which can mean both "man" and "father". Usually there's also claims of Matthew being originally authored in Hebrew, so there's potentially an element of mistranslation going on too. However, you could also just as easily say there's another ancestor mentioned there that a scribe missed. Both are possibilities worth considering.

    • @morlewen7218
      @morlewen7218 Год назад +1

      I case of 2, I think you are referring to Cainan and not Selah.

    • @MalachiCo0
      @MalachiCo0 Год назад +1

      @@morlewen7218 ah yes, my bad. I shall edit my comment approximately.

    • @tombeegeeeye5765
      @tombeegeeeye5765 Год назад

      Catholics are not bound to biblical literalism.

    • @MalachiCo0
      @MalachiCo0 Год назад +11

      @@ebogar42 Fascinating. What a wonderful, productive, and useful contribution. Go tip your fedora somewhere else r/atheist, the adults are talking.

    • @CTimmerman
      @CTimmerman Год назад +14

      @@ebogar42 You don't have to believe in Darth Vader either to know that he's Luke's father.

  • @Theescapist_87
    @Theescapist_87 10 месяцев назад +107

    This was so well done! I just started reading the book of Exodus and this chart was a very helpful visual

    • @angelrosario626
      @angelrosario626 6 месяцев назад

      There isn't enough evidence to substantiate that an Exodus took place. Most scholars agree that Moses and the Exodus is fabricated. No empirical evidence.

  • @FriendshipandPonies
    @FriendshipandPonies Год назад +194

    Awesome! I love your channel. I'm not religious, though I spent my first 21 years in the church. No matter, I am always interested in history and especially learning about religions. I love how you format these videos, super non judgemental, and very informative.

    • @MrVegasdeuce
      @MrVegasdeuce Год назад +6

      Same here.

    • @devilhunterred
      @devilhunterred Год назад

      You can't biologically spawn an entire race from just two parents, all the offspring would be so inbred by the 4-5th generation that they would all have horrible genetic illnesses, deformities and ultimately infertile. So this family tree is pure fiction.

    • @larrylewis6725
      @larrylewis6725 11 месяцев назад +5

      @FriendshipandPonies Judgement was made here by using BCE (Before Common Era) this eliminates the name of Jesus Christ for his birth, BC (Before Christ). AD stands for Anno Domini, Latin for “in the year of the Lord”. The calendars we use today are based upon Jesus Christ. I worked in a Surveying Co where I read many property deeds. At the the top of all these older deeds it always showed "In The Year of The Lord"....dated, and signed.

    • @SandraAnnEvans
      @SandraAnnEvans 11 месяцев назад +11

      I hope you develop a relationship with GOD for yourself. I grew up going to the Catholic Church every Sunday. As a teenager, I rebelled and stop going to church. But, in my very early 20's, I found my way back to GOD & JESUS CHRIST . . . With the world the way it is, things are coming to an end and I pray you find your way back to GOD. Religion is just a formal term people use to describe some kind of belief system. That is not what I am saying . . . I mean a personal relationship with GOD . . . Time is running out and the gate is narrow. GOD BLESS YOU.

    • @mmn5508
      @mmn5508 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@SandraAnnEvansamen

  • @aditimahajan2967
    @aditimahajan2967 4 месяца назад +5

    Incredibly thorough and well explained. Thank you for sharing your research!

  • @bsolomon76
    @bsolomon76 8 месяцев назад +67

    Wow, what an awesome visual display! Thank you so much for your time and effort in helping us understand the biblical genealogies. I am going to watch this many many more times!

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB 5 месяцев назад

      Lies again? Apple TV USD SGD

  • @plumtiger1
    @plumtiger1 7 месяцев назад +15

    What a great video! They always are! Really hate the BCE/CE stuff though. If a man can be born and literally spilt the calendar in two, he deserves to have his name on it.

  • @MuricaTurkey
    @MuricaTurkey Год назад +164

    Random little personal story: I actually had an ancestor named Zimri. My 5th (? Maybe 4th? I forget) great grandfather. I wonder why anyone would name their kid after a failed, hated king who was so stubborn and greedy for power that he literally went down in flames.
    Maybe it was that thing where parents name their child after someone they DON'T want their kid to be like? Maybe that was common in Appalachia? (That's where they lived) I'm not sure 🤷‍♀️😂
    Maybe they just simply opened The Bible randomly and looked for a name, saw Zimri, and decided it was meant to be.
    I'm not sure what kind of man he was. There's not a lot of info on him. Except that he was a Union Civil War vet with Kidney Disease (info from his pension paperwork/record).
    I guess less info means he probably wasn't as bad as his namesake, at least 😂

    • @johnkeefer8760
      @johnkeefer8760 Год назад +40

      Zimri likely means something along the lines of “Singer” or “Sing Praise” or “Praiseworthy”.
      So a good meaning although a bad example

    • @EAlyahya
      @EAlyahya Год назад +6

      I don’t think he was depicted as an antagonist because all the kings of Israel and Judah including David and Solomon sinned.

    • @kaylimcginnis
      @kaylimcginnis Год назад

      Sometimes the parents just like the name. One of my ancestors from like the 1700’s is named Lucifer and my family has been deeply Christian for centuries according to my dads baptism records research and passed down family records. Why any Christian would name their child after the devil is beyond me.

    • @timoteitodor2868
      @timoteitodor2868 Год назад +4

      totally get you! some people name their daughters Karen...

    • @missirina6912
      @missirina6912 Год назад +1

      You watch over Yeshua's (Jesus') life, as a Role Model. 🥰💖💞😇
      It doesn't matter your name's connection. 🤗🙏🙏🙏

  • @mrstanley1
    @mrstanley1 2 месяца назад +5

    You must know that Adam & Eve was not alone. There are another people. But Biblical text mention about chosen ones. Chart is beautiful made. Thank you.

  • @abolishthestate4762
    @abolishthestate4762 Год назад +18

    It’s insane how much I look forwards to hearing the words “Hi I’m Matt Baker.”

  • @googleisevil4733
    @googleisevil4733 10 месяцев назад +146

    The fact that this guy was able to make a chart AKA family tree of the Bible, means he just got my sub! Well done! 😊👍

    • @hakimarkam-tn1yx
      @hakimarkam-tn1yx 10 месяцев назад +1

      bibles not bible to many

    • @doppleganger683
      @doppleganger683 7 месяцев назад +4

      How is incest a sin but literally everyone here would be inbred to the point of mutation/ sterilization?

    • @TheSignofJonah777
      @TheSignofJonah777 7 месяцев назад

      @@doppleganger683difference between necessity and relationships. Would it be a sin to cut off the arm of a man who got it stuck in a machine and would die?

    • @doppleganger683
      @doppleganger683 7 месяцев назад +4

      @@TheSignofJonah777 The fact this is being justified is sickening.. When did God change people's minds to not become physically ill at the thought of incest? This concept of free will is a sham.

    • @TheSignofJonah777
      @TheSignofJonah777 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@doppleganger683 If you are an atheist than what is the basis for your moral argument. Out of the book of atheism?

  • @dainius9264
    @dainius9264 Год назад +30

    I love your channel, you help me to piece together the most contraversial and eye opening map including every mythology and religion into the mix. And this one just takes the cake. Thank you

  • @Whois514
    @Whois514 2 месяца назад +1

    As a victim for over 4 years I myself can relate to you. Initially it was very difficult for me. Later I found that listening to cricket and tinnitus masking frequency works to lower the volume as well as sometimes keep it soft. I turn on my hp every night as I sleep. While awake ignoring the ringing within helps much. Tq for the encouragement.God bless ❤

  • @psychedelicyeti6053
    @psychedelicyeti6053 11 месяцев назад +50

    I love how much research you put into your videos and make it easy to understand. And you included the Christian and Jewish timelines as well! Great work!

  • @Timothy1976
    @Timothy1976 11 месяцев назад +393

    This is absolutely awesome. The amount of work that must have gone into the research to have this so clearly laid out. Thank you to whoever put this together

  • @nancycolbert2703
    @nancycolbert2703 Год назад +36

    This was so fascinating. Thank you for your time and knowledge in creating this masterpiece. I am thinking of purchasing for my church once I show them this video.

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda Год назад +2

      nancy, I hope you and your church people read the Holy Bible instead, as there are some errors in this video.

    • @larrylewis6725
      @larrylewis6725 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@earlysda Please share that with us, okay?

    • @soniawilliams7076
      @soniawilliams7076 11 месяцев назад

      @@earlysdahighlight the errors

    • @earlysda
      @earlysda 11 месяцев назад

      @@soniawilliams7076sonia and larry: 1:40 He says early portions of the Bible may just be literary, thus throwing shade on the Bible's accuracy in historical matters.
      8:19 He says: "If you choose to follow the timeline literally.", thus throwing more shade on the Bible.
      11:33 He says Rehoboam reigned over Judah, but actually it was Judah and Benjamin.
      14:33 He says that the Israelites dwelt in Egypt for 430 years. This is a common misconception from uncareful reading of the text. Galatians 3:17 "And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect." This makes it very clear that the 430 years started from when God made the covenant with Abraham, and Abraham split the animals in two, and then walked between them, to the time that the Israelites left Egypt (or perhaps even to the day they received the 10 Commandments, I don't know), was 430 years. That makes more sense too, because it was a Passover when they left, and a "Passover" when Abraham walked between the two halves of the sacrifice.
      .
      I didn't bother watching the rest. Most of the video is good, but as I stated last month, there are some errors in this video. Creating doubt regarding the historical accuracy of any part of the Bible is actually serious error.

  • @ambientauras
    @ambientauras Месяц назад +2

    So happy I found this, I was going to make one myself to make sense of everything but now I’ve found this it’s makes everything so clear

  • @רוןזיתוני-י7נ
    @רוןזיתוני-י7נ Год назад +79

    Second mistake I spotted: in the end of the video, you show the Jewish dates. Is there any chance you mixed Seth and Shem? You explain how "Seth" was born 500 years after Noah. The only Seth that I know of (and the only one on the chart) is Adam's and Eve's son, Noah's Ancestor. Shem would make much more sense in that context :)

    • @UsefulCharts
      @UsefulCharts  Год назад +96

      Good catch. Yes, it should be Shem. I'll change it.

    • @geepea101able
      @geepea101able Год назад +1

      ​@@UsefulCharts
      Could you tell me who Cain procreated with to start his own tribe! No mention of women in your tree!

    • @frimmbits
      @frimmbits Год назад +1

      Shem was the father of the semites

    • @geepea101able
      @geepea101able Год назад

      Any body able to answer my question?

    • @UsefulCharts
      @UsefulCharts  Год назад +3

      I answer that question within the first 2 minutes of the video.

  • @DJ-ct6so
    @DJ-ct6so Год назад +30

    Amazing - the entire OT (+ more) diagrammed and articulated in 35 minutes. Fantastic work sir.

    • @ElpidaOrthodox
      @ElpidaOrthodox 6 месяцев назад

      @user-hi9jy5wy1mIt’s actually more pointless for someone who doesn’t believe in this yet spends his precious time on videos like these💀🤡

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      True. He left out God's sixth day. That's make the entire Bible nonsense by his standard.

  • @peternicholsonu6090
    @peternicholsonu6090 10 месяцев назад +80

    Thankyou Matt great work. I started my chart in 1970 when I was 23yrs old and agree so much with what you have done. Little point of interest when secular and biblical dates coincide I was used to calling that an ‘absolute’ date.
    I worked on the year the Medes and Persians overthrew Babylon. The record of Nabonidus the father and coregent of Belshazzar made on a clay tablet states that event was Oct 5-6 539 B.C.E. according to the Gregorian calendar. So I was very close to you by getting Adams creation at 4026.

    • @drmoynihan
      @drmoynihan 9 месяцев назад +7

      Yes, I was 19 in 1970. Both my wife and I have, at different times, tried to figure this out - but then life gets in the way. For a Scholar, studies like this is their life, and I thank them.

    • @dcdanger6151
      @dcdanger6151 9 месяцев назад +6

      Is 4026 actually just 6000 yrs ago ?

    • @AK49IAN
      @AK49IAN 9 месяцев назад

      ​​@@dcdanger6151That would be fake news because as of now year of creation is 7,532

    • @realEmoSedillo
      @realEmoSedillo 7 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@dcdanger6151 Yes, in 2024 the Earth is turning 6000 years old.

    • @Robbyrool
      @Robbyrool 7 месяцев назад +1

      Yes, the creation of the first humans was a little over 6,000 years ago. Not the creation of the earth and galaxies, etc. The creation “days” were time periods, not 24 hour days. Especially since some of them took place before there was an earth to have 24 hour days. They may have been millions of years or more in length. But human history only extends back 6,000+ years. Note: 4,000 bce to 2,001 ce would be 6,000 years, as there was no year zero. It went from 1 bce to 1 ce. And 4,025 bce would be going back further than 4,000, so we already passed 6,000 years decades ago, contrary to erroneous comments above. Radiocarbon dating that disagrees with Biblical chronology is just wrong. It fails to take into consideration facts such as the great flood/deluge, and potentially how that altered the earth’s atmosphere by removing a water vapor canopy, allowing more uv rays to penetrate, altering growth rates, changes in the earth’s magnetic field allowing more cosmic rays to penetrate, changing the rate of carbon-14 formation and accumulation, and the apparent ages of creatures from before then compared to after. Don’t be intimidated by ridiculers.

  • @mach2262
    @mach2262 6 месяцев назад +5

    Awesome video! Will definitely download and watch again and again and probably again 😁🤩🙏🏻

  • @gillianarmstrong955
    @gillianarmstrong955 10 месяцев назад +36

    This is truly amazing how you have put all this together. Thank you.

    • @kathybrem880
      @kathybrem880 6 месяцев назад

      He’s got a great imagination

  • @q-tuber7034
    @q-tuber7034 Год назад +11

    Good job, as usual, for being authoritative and accessible for a wide-ranging audience (including explaining the scholarly dating terminology and also not making a big deal of it)

  • @KevinCablez
    @KevinCablez Год назад +24

    This is a really great detailed genealogy of the Bible. Thank you for your countless hours of research and work.
    I just purchased this from your website and subscribed to your channel. Keep up the good work, and looking forward to more chart videos

    • @devilhunterred
      @devilhunterred Год назад

      You can't biologically spawn an entire race from just two parents, all the offspring would be so inbred by the 4-5th generation that they would all have horrible genetic illnesses, deformities and ultimately infertile. So this family tree is pure fiction.

    • @Juya_ElectroBeats
      @Juya_ElectroBeats 10 месяцев назад

      Muhammad was indeed a descendant of Abraham from the Arabs

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@Juya_ElectroBeatswrong

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      This isn't good work. It is nothing but nonsense by a false teacher.

  • @arnoldh2275
    @arnoldh2275 22 дня назад

    It's refreshing to watch one of your videos that explicitly charts from the biblical narrative without an attempt to discredit it with a secular narrative. Some viewers are just interested in the biblical presentation of continuity

  • @ollied.7712
    @ollied.7712 Год назад +13

    The work you put into each of your videos is impressive.

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      To bad it is a false teaching.

  • @paulredinger5830
    @paulredinger5830 9 месяцев назад +18

    Man you put a LOT of time doing your research! Thank you brother! 🙏🏻

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      False teaching my friend. Read Genesis. There were sixth day creations that God said were good.

  • @_maloo_5665
    @_maloo_5665 Месяц назад +1

    slight correction at 9:33, the bible says that God spoke to Samuel and told him to warn the people that Saul would be a terrible ruler that would take their sons as soldiers and daughters as workers.

  • @manoffewtalents9992
    @manoffewtalents9992 Год назад +39

    Thank you for this great chart! Just one question/suggestion/criticism: Why do you leave out Dinah? We know nothing of her progeny, but she still is a daughter of Jacob and imo deserves to be mentioned. More so than many others on this chart who don't even have a narrative connected to their name.

    • @NageelaMom
      @NageelaMom Год назад +3

      Because this video specifically is looking at the genealogy leading to Jesus...

    • @manoffewtalents9992
      @manoffewtalents9992 Год назад +17

      @@NageelaMom By that metric a lot of the people on the chart could be omitted. Including several of the other children of Jacob.

  • @AnabolicUnitarian
    @AnabolicUnitarian Год назад +10

    The Book of Jubilees, which is found in Ethiopian and Eritrean Christian and Jewish Scriptures and used by ancient Jews and some early Christians, actually names matriarchs (i.e. the elsewhere unnamed wives of many of these partriarchs).
    Also, Nathan son of David is in the Tanakh. He didn’t come out of nowhere lol (2 Sam. 5: 14; 1 Chron. 3:5 and 14:4).

  • @benjeanettebooth1800
    @benjeanettebooth1800 Год назад +9

    A very excellent overview and presentation! This puts so much of the biblical narrative into historical perspective. Thanks for sharing!

  • @robg_
    @robg_ 6 месяцев назад +3

    1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Bible
    “Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you-unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures”,

    • @ishakzakaria3923
      @ishakzakaria3923 Месяц назад

      scripture? What part of scripture do you know? let us know the verses please? 😂 and let us discuss about it together in here.

  • @garmbeliblis9791
    @garmbeliblis9791 Год назад +18

    Very nice synthesis of your previous works in this series! This chart is very well thought out.

  • @flordgold356
    @flordgold356 11 месяцев назад +24

    Wonderful! Finally I’ve found out how everything went from the time of creation of Adam and Eva. I was struggling to comprehending it and I realize everything makes more sense. Thank you!

    • @gdutfulkbhh7537
      @gdutfulkbhh7537 10 месяцев назад +3

      How everything is said to have gone, anyway.

    • @Tr33People
      @Tr33People 8 месяцев назад +3

      Now you know the myth in depth. You can't populate the earth with 2 people.

    • @vassabatielos4740
      @vassabatielos4740 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@Tr33Peopleexactly
      It’s nothing more than mythical codswallop

    • @nathans4068
      @nathans4068 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@Tr33PeopleHow do you believe the earth came to be populated? Whatever it started with, it had to have started with 2 single things

    • @rileysmall4317
      @rileysmall4317 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@nathans4068no it did not.

  • @sarahthomas9920
    @sarahthomas9920 3 месяца назад +2

    Thank you so much for this! I have just started reading Genesis and find the lineage really interesting

  • @anti-validation
    @anti-validation Год назад +8

    The "year" has not been a standard unit over the centuries. It has changed several times. It may also refer to a lunar calendar vs a solar calendar.

  • @p.m.pilgrim
    @p.m.pilgrim Год назад +36

    It makes sense you didn't mention her bc she's not that big a deal, but you should at least include Rahab's name on the chart idk, it feels like she deserves to be shown, she's one of Boaz's grandmas I think

    • @quinterbeck
      @quinterbeck Год назад +7

      She was a big enough deal for Matthew the gospel writer! She got included in his genealogy

    • @kaylimcginnis
      @kaylimcginnis Год назад +5

      Rahab is definitely a big deal. She is one of David grandmothers (not sure how many grates but I think it’s 2-4) she a matriarch of the line of David

  • @Gridlocksheldon
    @Gridlocksheldon Месяц назад

    This is absolutely amazing a real eye-opener. Thank you so much for taking the time to do this work especially for believers bless up.

  • @2mdallas
    @2mdallas 10 месяцев назад +13

    Bravo !! The amount and detail of info presented here is astonishing. A wonderful and clear chronological study.

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      Boy have you been fooled by a false teacher.

  • @vadec5909
    @vadec5909 Год назад +6

    Totally, amazing! Informative! Interesting! Explained and laid out perfectly! Thank you so much

  • @liquidmoo619
    @liquidmoo619 6 месяцев назад +9

    Being a prophet is the same as when you were younger and had no clue how to do the work but luckily the teacher starts of yours to show the rest of the class as an example

  • @FRISHR
    @FRISHR Месяц назад +1

    My favorite part is when Abraham’s first 2 sons created the Uchiha & Senju Clan.

  • @cooper7354
    @cooper7354 9 месяцев назад +17

    This is pretty cool. I’ve spent the last 10 years building something similar to this in excel as a timeline. One suggestion I’d give is get “The Coming Prince” by Sir Robert Anderson. As far as the back tracking of your dates there are some chances you’ll end up making. For instance 1 King 480 years is actually going to turn out to be 570 years when referenced in acts. If you take the years they were under servitude in the book of judges out of the 570 then you get 480. Also the 430 years in Egypt isn’t 430 years IN Egypt. It’s 430 years from the moment Abraham was given the command to depart his land. Only 3 generations are in Egypt as well and you can’t get 430 years for only 3 generations. Fun things that we can always dig and dig and dig into. And most people skip the genealogies. Haha.

    • @michaelbaeza5074
      @michaelbaeza5074 8 месяцев назад +2

      If your a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim or even if you don't believe it's a stunning & eye popping History & thank you so much...sharing w all my family & friends

  • @christinewera7260
    @christinewera7260 11 месяцев назад +6

    I've learnt something in full for the very first time after reading my bible many time but still couldn't make sense of the many tribes and rulers. Thank you so much for the perfect explanation

    • @wozo9210
      @wozo9210 7 месяцев назад +1

      Basically everything in the old testament is just jewish storytelling I wouldnt get too caught up in the specifics lmao

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      You still can't because this is False teaching. You don't understand the earth ages or the sixth day creations. You can never understand Scripture without knowing the earth ages, the sixth day and what happened in the garden. There was no apple eating but there was some beguiling going on.

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@wozo9210so how do you explain the Septuagint?

    • @wozo9210
      @wozo9210 5 месяцев назад

      @@Rich-fk5zk the translation of jewish traditions? theres nothing to explain?

  • @kacornish1
    @kacornish1 Год назад +28

    I’m not a very religious person, but I do believe in God. I love this type of religious/biblical history. It is very interesting.

    • @emmacohen3926
      @emmacohen3926 Год назад +6

      The term biblical historical is in fact an oxymoron.🇬🇧

    • @shrekswampwalker3338
      @shrekswampwalker3338 Год назад +2

      @@emmacohen3926 How so?

    • @ndjibukabengele973
      @ndjibukabengele973 Год назад

      @@emmacohen3926
      Lol, your ignorance is mind boggling lol, the Bible confirms history and vice versa lol fool.

    • @kacornish1
      @kacornish1 Год назад +8

      @@emmacohen3926 No, it’s not… There is historical evidence for some events in the Bible. You should educate yourself. You can be anti-bible if you want to be, but you don’t need to post incorrect comments.

    • @emmacohen3926
      @emmacohen3926 Год назад

      @@kacornish1 ABSOLUTELY NO evidence of Jesus other than the made up nonsense that you believe,,I suggest you investigate Codex vaticanus ,,,
      (Yes I guessed it) you are totally unaware of this Bible ,!!!🤣🤣🤣😂😂🇬🇧 PS ignorance is bliss 😟

  • @bettycaudill3299
    @bettycaudill3299 3 месяца назад

    Mind boggling. I don't know how many times I will watch this and read the Bible before it will sink into this old noggin of mine. Thank you. You always do good videos. Keep it up.

  • @middlelle
    @middlelle Год назад +21

    I’ve always wondered why Mathew and Luke had different ancestry for Jesus.

    • @radagast25a
      @radagast25a Год назад +7

      There is absolutely NO evidence for the apologetics spin at all. If you are a literalist, it is impossible for an author to have used Joseph's name for Mary - and the explanation that "it was the time, they couldn't use a female's name, etc." is belied by other women being mentioned in various lineages and by the simple reality that if you are talking about a book literally penned by almighty god, using human instruments - GOD can put anything he wants in his book and who is going to stop Him? No, the Bible isn't literal and the two authors recorded a different lineage, remembering too that NONE of the gospels were written by the men whose names are ascribed to them.

    • @kstaxksss.160
      @kstaxksss.160 Год назад +2

      @@radagast25aabsolutely false.

    • @JustWasted3HoursHere
      @JustWasted3HoursHere Год назад +12

      Because the writers screwed up, or they heard the stories differently before they wrote them down themselves. Don't forget that the printing press was not invented until the 15th century and all works before then were handed down by word of mouth and/or copied by hand for many many centuries. This is also why stories that Mark, Matthew and Luke tell that are the same, differ in slight and not so slight ways. If they were truly inspired by an omnipotent being they would be exactly the same.
      Adam and Eve definitely did not have enough children (especially girls) to account for all the humans in the world. Cain met his wife in another town and "knew" her, but there is no explanation for where she came from. If she was one of Adam and Eve's daughters then surely she would have been named.

    • @radagast25a
      @radagast25a Год назад

      @@kstaxksss.160 Proof please, not supposition, not guesses, not apologetics, show me the verses that say that . THAT is what literalism means. I was in an evangelical church, I was ordained in an evangelical church. I was wrong. I realized that many decades ago. Show me the verses that say that either of the two accounts are actually Mary. Go ahead. THERE ARE NONE. You are depending in one way or another on the argument from necessity, a broadly used logical fallacy ( basically "Oh my faith needs this to be true - that shows it isn't true - so hmmm... this unsupported guess must be true because I need it to be true and it explains away the problem I'm having with what is ACTUALLY there.") or a sudden respect for period culture "Oh, they wouldn't let a woman's lineage to be recorded" Exactly who can forbid Almighty God from including any lineage he wants?????? That argument is even weaker unless you acknowledge that the Bible is just a book. So go ahead, show me PROOF that one of those lineages, ascribed to Joseph is actually Mary.

    • @mouthpiece200
      @mouthpiece200 Год назад +7

      @@JustWasted3HoursHere The Bible says they had more children, even if they're not named. If people were living super long times, then each woman could bare a huge litter of children.

  • @AnAccount
    @AnAccount Год назад +7

    This is very well done! One other person you could have added at the end is Paul, who descended from the Tribe of Benjamin. Regardless, this is great!

  • @j.r.6517
    @j.r.6517 10 месяцев назад +5

    Well explained in details. I have to listen to this at least a dozen times to swallow most of it. Thank You Dear.
    Praise The Lord 🙏❤️

  • @jondicsre3056
    @jondicsre3056 6 месяцев назад +8

    I too have wanted to do this, so THANK You for making my life a bit easier 😂. Excelent, your best chart yet, I will have to buy this. What was also so good about this is how you gave some biblical and historical context. Great job!

  • @evanleed1767
    @evanleed1767 Год назад +7

    Maybe it'd be worth mentioning Ruth's other family? Naomi is a fairly significant character in the book of Ruth.
    Also Hannah and Elkanah (Samuel's parents) are fairly significant people in 1 Samuel.

  • @sprN0VA
    @sprN0VA 10 месяцев назад +13

    This was an amazing walkthrough! Thank you for sharing the incredible result of what must have been quite a time intensive project! One thing that I still don't understand is why we switched from BC/AD to BCE/CE, because the dates stayed the same and even with the name change, they still center around the life of Christ. Not sure how this would work into a future useful chart, but I'd be interested to see if that discussion could be made into an infographic.

    • @kunaikat2232
      @kunaikat2232 10 месяцев назад +4

      i agree, its so pointless. i still use bc and ad haha

    • @marktester5799
      @marktester5799 9 месяцев назад +1

      I once heard it was because the actual year of Jesus' birth is unknown, but most likely 6 BCE to 1 CE. I use BCE and CE here because it doesn't make any sense to say Jesus was born up to 6 years Before Christ. It's really only when you try to date Jesus' birth that it's an issue, which I don't personally think warrants a change.

    • @mzahra1
      @mzahra1 8 месяцев назад +8

      BC/AD and BCE/CE are two different systems of numbering years, both of which are used to label or number years in the Gregorian calendar. The primary difference lies in their religious or cultural connotations.
      BC/AD (Before Christ/Anno Domini):
      BC stands for "Before Christ," and it counts the years before the traditional date of the birth of Jesus Christ.
      AD stands for "Anno Domini," which is Latin for "In the Year of Our Lord." It counts the years after the traditional date of the birth of Jesus Christ.
      BCE/CE (Before Common Era/Common Era):
      BCE stands for "Before Common Era," and it is equivalent to BC. It counts the years before the common era.
      CE stands for "Common Era," and it is equivalent to AD. It counts the years in the common era.
      The switch from BC/AD to BCE/CE is largely a matter of cultural sensitivity and inclusivity. The traditional BC/AD system is explicitly tied to Christian religious beliefs, and it can be perceived by some as exclusionary to non-Christian individuals and cultures. As a result, the BCE/CE notation is often preferred by some in academic and intercultural contexts as a more neutral and inclusive way to denote years without relying on religious terminology.
      The use of BCE/CE is not a rejection of the Gregorian calendar or its historical basis but rather a way to make the dating system more universally acceptable in diverse cultural and religious settings. It is important to note that both systems use the same calendar and count the years in the same way; the only difference is in the terminology used to label the eras.

    • @kunaikat2232
      @kunaikat2232 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@mzahra1 blahblahblahblah.
      Its the same calendar.

    • @mzahra1
      @mzahra1 8 месяцев назад

      That's exactly what I said lol. I'm Christian. The change was made for non-Christians. @@kunaikat2232

  • @Azriela.
    @Azriela. 9 месяцев назад +14

    Amazing Biblical Family Tree.
    Great job.
    Shalom & blessings

    • @hhaste
      @hhaste 6 месяцев назад

      @user-hi9jy5wy1m These people are so brainwashed, they won't believe any facts you present them. Maybe not this specific person but in general..

    • @WorldlyBudget
      @WorldlyBudget 6 месяцев назад

      It’s made up. It didn’t happen. Evolution is scientific fact.

  • @nimagougol8781
    @nimagougol8781 3 дня назад

    Sumerian 3350 BCE (Sam, Noah’s son (peace upon)). Hammurabi 1750 BCE (Nimrod). Merneptah 1203 BCE (Exodus Pharaoh).

  • @jessicadjonne2687
    @jessicadjonne2687 8 месяцев назад +7

    Excellent!! Thank you!
    Great gift to use to explain to your kids, family, friends, students, etc.!

  • @angelabecker9611
    @angelabecker9611 Год назад +8

    This sparked a memory from my 8th grade creation science class that I took in part as a favor to the woman teaching it. (I was homeschooled, though not for religious reasons.) In the book the class used, they presented a "scientific" reason for the Biblical men living so long: an oxygenated atmosphere. The idea was that at the beginning of creation, there was a lot of oxygen, so people were super healthy. After the Flood, however, a good chunk of that oxygen was moved into the Earth's water, thus rendering humanity's lifespan to the shorter length it is today.
    This video was really cool! I always had trouble following the names in the Bible, especially the Old Testament. Now I may not be able to keep track of all of them, but I at least have some visualization of their passage through history. I didn't know that the one king of Judah was pictured!

    • @CharleneWoelk
      @CharleneWoelk Год назад +6

      Also it never rained, water didn't fall from the sky but came up through the ground. So crops were watered by underground aquifers. That's why everyone thought Noah was crazy because water didn't fall from the sky. Also the climate would have been consistent throughout the year. With an oxygenated atmosphere and no hills or mountains temperatures and weather patterns would be the same from day to day.

    • @CTimmerman
      @CTimmerman Год назад

      I read dinosaurs were huge thanks to more oxygen, and that long human lifespans were thanks to better genes, which also solved the incest taboo.

    • @vids595
      @vids595 Год назад +8

      Wow, they had no idea how biology works at all.

    • @devilhunterred
      @devilhunterred Год назад

      You can't biologically spawn an entire race from just two parents, all the offspring would be so inbred by the 4-5th generation that they would all have horrible genetic illnesses, deformities and ultimately infertile. So this family tree is pure fiction.

    • @angelabecker9611
      @angelabecker9611 Год назад +7

      @@vids595 Yeah, it was all based on a single book from the 70s. Young Earth Creationists like that book because it dovetails with what they believe and helps form an echo chamber. Keeping my mouth shut and sucking up to get an A and get out of that class was one of the more difficult things I've done over the course of my life, though it did prove unfortunately useful for college.

  • @lauramann8275
    @lauramann8275 Год назад +11

    You're videos are fabulous! Thank you for all of your hard work!

  • @mrsev765
    @mrsev765 Год назад +13

    Oh boy, that's a lot of incest

    • @kyleruiz7167
      @kyleruiz7167 Год назад +1

      Back then incest was a lot less of a genetic danger since there wasn't as many genetic mutations in the gene pool back then so it was just more of a cultural norm

    • @MarkLLawrence
      @MarkLLawrence 4 месяца назад +1

      Needs some banjo music to make it perfect

    • @mtb5778
      @mtb5778 18 дней назад

      @@kyleruiz7167 what are you talking about? genetic diversity including mutations have been essential to human evolution.

  • @wafee2001
    @wafee2001 Год назад +14

    Thanks, Matt, for this wonderful chart. Lots of information although I wish there's more on Babylonian Exilarch side from the line of Hananya ben Zerubbabel at least few names until 1258. Anyway, thank you for such informative table including inter family marriages within the tribe which is still practiced in order to preserve the bloodline.

  • @flotmeister1247
    @flotmeister1247 Год назад +5

    Great chart and video again
    One small typo I found in the timeline on the left, at around 15:15, Noah was 600 years old according to Genesis 7:6, not Genesis 6:7

  • @ritafong8587
    @ritafong8587 5 дней назад

    The best chart and explanation!

  • @TheCooperAX
    @TheCooperAX Год назад +7

    This chart is excellent. Timely since I just reread genesis.
    Have a map to follow along with the dates would really be fascinating.

    • @Rich-fk5zk
      @Rich-fk5zk 5 месяцев назад

      So if you just reread Genesis; please explain how this dude forgot about the sixth day creations that GOD said were good? False teaching my friend. Christians must look out for one an another and not believe false teaching that doesn't comport with Scripture.

  • @cmacdhon
    @cmacdhon Год назад +6

    I didn't realize how many names are biblical in origin.

    • @slav4335
      @slav4335 Год назад

      john
      matthew
      gabriel
      jesus
      david
      mary
      adam
      eve
      abraham
      isaac
      jacob
      theres a lot of names you don't even realise are biblical

  • @denisecarhartt4840
    @denisecarhartt4840 9 месяцев назад +7

    Thank you for sharing this phenomenal chart!

  • @alx42013
    @alx42013 4 месяца назад +1

    The book of first Enoch and the book of jubilees confirms a lot of the genealogy that's in the Bible. In both books were in the Dead Sea scrolls in the biblical Canon. Awesome timeline in genealogy timeline map I really appreciate it ,thank you may God bless you and your channel.

  • @hitherae9202
    @hitherae9202 Год назад +5

    Beautifully done and navigated. Chart is very reasonably priced at $20. Awesome work!

    • @devilhunterred
      @devilhunterred Год назад

      You can't biologically spawn an entire race from just two parents, all the offspring would be so inbred by the 4-5th generation that they would all have horrible genetic illnesses, deformities and ultimately infertile. So this family tree is pure fiction.

  • @fredwagner240
    @fredwagner240 6 месяцев назад +8

    I'm really happy I ran across your channel, your an outstanding teacher young man.

  • @magicLA1980
    @magicLA1980 6 месяцев назад +4

    I really appreciate all the hard work and research! Very well done

  • @mikegreensberg3316
    @mikegreensberg3316 4 месяца назад

    Good work. I Appreciated very much that you included the KUSHITE PHARAOHS in the chronology. Because no one talk about they existence and those who mention it are always ridiculed and silenced.

  • @RDRLegend23
    @RDRLegend23 Год назад +10

    Do you sell them with the traditional BC and AD dates, rather than common era? It's just weird to use "religiously neutral" terminology when making a family tree of the BIble. That is my one critique. Other than that, everything was great.

    • @UsefulCharts
      @UsefulCharts  Год назад +4

      Well, the Bible (at least 75% of it) is used by TWO major world religions, Judaism and Christianity, not just one, and therefore I think using religiously neutral terms IS important.

  • @najunnazar786
    @najunnazar786 5 месяцев назад +9

    (In Arabic) in Bible
    1.(ʾĀdam)Adam
    2.(ʾIdrīs)Idris-"@Against Corrouption of Qabil"
    3.(Nūḥ)Noah
    4.(Hūd)Hud- "Over confident people"
    5.(Ṣāliḥ)Salih
    6.(ʾIbrāhīm)Abraham
    7.(Lūṭ)Lot
    8.(ʾIsmāʿīl)Ishmael
    9.(ʾIsḥāq)Isaac
    10.(Yaʿqūb)Jacob
    11.(Yūsuf)Joseph
    12.(ʾAyyūb)Job
    13.(Shu‘ayb)Jethro
    14.(Mūsā)Moses-Tawrah (Torah)
    15.(Hārūn)Aaron
    16.(Ḍū al-Kifl)Ezekiel
    17(Dāwūd)David-Zabur
    18.(Sulaymān)Solomon
    19.(ʾIlyās)Elijah
    20.(al-Yasaʿ)Elisha
    21.(Yūnus)Jonah
    22.(Zakarīyā)Zechariah
    23.(Yaḥyā)John the Baptist
    24.(ʿĪsā)Jesus-Injil (Gospel)
    25.(Moḥammad)Quran-All of Mankind & Jinn

  • @bobchronister3429
    @bobchronister3429 10 месяцев назад +5

    Absolutely incredible presentation. Thank you. Look forward to checking out the rest of your work.

  • @masada2828
    @masada2828 3 месяца назад +1

    Abraham did not marry Hagia, she was Sarah’s maid, not a wife, she was lent according to custom. Abraham did not remarry until after Sarah died & after her death, he married Keturah & had 6 sons.

  • @SeeNightingale
    @SeeNightingale 6 месяцев назад +4

    Thank you for this. I've always wanted to do this, but it's such a huge task. After watching this, I would have never touched half of the information you provided. This was great!!!

  • @evanleed1767
    @evanleed1767 Год назад +7

    You state that Nathan is previously unknown before the Gospel of Luke mentions him, and thus choose to not include him on the chart. But Nathan is mentioned as one of Bathsheba's other 3 sons in 2 Samuel 5-14 and in 1 Chronicles 3-5 and 14-4.

    • @UsefulCharts
      @UsefulCharts  Год назад +4

      I stand corrected.

    • @evanleed1767
      @evanleed1767 Год назад +1

      @@UsefulCharts Would there be any chance of having Nathan added to the chart? I get that David had 15 other kids not mentioned on the chart, and you're wisely trying to only mention the people that get bigger mentions in Bible. But I feel like Nathan is significant enough to get a mention due to the connection to the Genealogy of Jesus. You could even have small unbolded text beneath Nathan's name mentioning that "The Gospel of Luke lists 20 descendants between Nathan and Zerubbabel".

    • @UsefulCharts
      @UsefulCharts  Год назад +2

      Yeah, I might do that.

    • @evanleed1767
      @evanleed1767 Год назад +1

      ​@@UsefulCharts Nice! Thanks for responding!
      Not to be forceful with suggestions, but here are a few more you can consider if you'd like:
      There are a few key women in the Bible that are probably also worth a mention. Namely:
      - Hannah (Samuel's Mother, known for earnestly asking God for a son) and husband Elkanah.
      - Miriam (Sister of Moses, Prophetess who helped in leading the Exodus).
      - Naomi (Mother in law of Ruth, mentor to Ruth) and her family (though admittedly that might be a bit harder to fit in...)
      - I think Ezra is a descendant of Seraiah (last high priest) - Ezra 7:1
      - Is Hoshea in the prophets line meant to be Hosea? (no 'H')
      - The last king of Judah was Zedekiah, not Zechariah.
      - Unlike Elisha under Elijah, Amos wasn't really tutored under Elisha or anything. Nor Hosea. Not sure if the arrows are a bit misleading considering how they are used everywhere else on the chart.
      - Any reason for not showing all the other minor prophets? Just not enough room? If so, fair enough, but why only show Amos and Hosea? Is it because they have clearer positions in the timeline or something?
      - Is the prophet Zephaniah worth mentioning, considering he's a descendant of Hezekiah and is thus actually tied more closely to the family tree? And also Mordecai, cousin of Esther, considering he's a notable character in the Bible? (Perhaps don't need to show Esther's father, just a line to Mordecai with the word "cousin" above)
      Anyway, again, I don't want to be forceful with my suggestions or questions. I love trying to understand the process involved in making charts, specifically in deciding what to include and not include. I think you've done a wonderful job with this chart thus far, and I especially love the inclusion of all the nearby kings and rulers and the relevant Bible verses put next to them! :)

  • @Davidbirdman101
    @Davidbirdman101 20 дней назад +2

    Am I wrong for wondering why instead of bringing people together, the arguments over these long dead ancestors still divide whole nations and fuel an insane rage that threatens to destroy the world. Am I wrong?

    • @redlion6505
      @redlion6505 13 дней назад

      Yeshua said "I came not to bring peace, but a sword"

  • @jessd460
    @jessd460 Год назад +7

    I REALLY like your work - thank you SO much for making your videos!! I also have a question I was hoping you could answer. Perhaps I overlooked it, but I didn't see Jacob & Leah's daughter Dinah listed on here. I am curious if she had a bloodline at all, and if so, what came of it? I am curious if her story can be corroborated or verified from sources other than the Bible. I don't think the bible is clear as to whether or not she actually conceived or had a child with Shechem after the defiling incident mentioned in Genesis 34. I have wondered if Israel's 12 sons/tribes maybe had relatives from an offspring with their only sister, Dinah (the sole daughter of Jacob's named children). I don't think the bible mentions her again after Gen 34, except briefly in Genesis 46:15. Any insight is appreciated, and thank you once more for such AWESOME work!!!

  • @bradleydavidson4948
    @bradleydavidson4948 Год назад +5

    Thanks!

  • @MrBendibus
    @MrBendibus Месяц назад

    Outstanding piece of work to produce the chart

  • @ankr3w1
    @ankr3w1 4 месяца назад +5

    You should do the Elven family tree from the lord of the rings. It's just as historically accurate.

  • @stevedoss5815
    @stevedoss5815 4 месяца назад +1

    Excellent presentation sir! I’m impressed!

  • @tenpiecevg
    @tenpiecevg 6 месяцев назад +3

    So far so good.may God the Almighty bless you and give you more inspiration to unlock these secred truths about the Bible history ❤❤❤

  • @slopehoke1277
    @slopehoke1277 Год назад +4

    22:29 Matt's using the depiction of the statue from Nebuchadnezzar's dream he showed in the "Daniel and Revelations" video as Nebuchadnezzar picture.

  • @godemperorofmankind3.091
    @godemperorofmankind3.091 Год назад +4

    Please redo your old video on Game of Thrones. The tree of Targaryen monarchs is very intricate and interesting.

  • @CShalom988
    @CShalom988 4 месяца назад +1

    Even him already doing all the work still makes my head hurt because you really have to pay attention 😮‍💨

  • @christianchauhan23
    @christianchauhan23 Год назад +7

    💛 all your videos mate👍

  • @Macion-sm2ui
    @Macion-sm2ui Год назад +4

    1:10 I remember from school times when someone ask the same question. Then our teacher said, that Adam and Eve were firs humans, but God created more humans later.I have no idea wheather this thiesis has some theological background or was it just theacher personal believe, but this sounds better to me than incest

    • @cowboycurtis2229
      @cowboycurtis2229 Год назад +3

      Incestual relations were not condemned in the Bible until the law was given to Moses. They were pretty common from Cain and Seth all the way until then, among pagans as well as God-fearing people. We've created this stigma around the idea of incest in the modern world, and that's easy to do when there's 8 billion people on the planet and we have plenty of options for procreating. But it wasn't the same back then. There were far fewer people, and most lived in tribal settings with limited options of procreating with people outside of the tribe or regional areas where they lived. This would result in incestual relations out of necessity.
      From a biblical standpoint, as I understand it, the reason was acceptable back then was that when Adam and Eve were created, the gene pool was perfect and so incest wouldn't have been frowned upon because it was the only option to populate the earth, and the nearly perfect gene pool wouldn't have had the biological issues that it does today. Once sin entered the world, the gene pool started to get steadily worse, until the time of Moses when it was at the point that genetic deformities as a result of such relations would become more common, and so God condemned it in order to prevent those kinds of issues. It's actually a pretty common thing that God did... He did the same thing with the dietary restrictions... knowing that certain animals more commonly carried diseases or were less easy to properly prepare, he just established the dietary code for Jews to avoid them in the first place.
      Beyond that, there are theological issues with the idea that God created other humans later on. I Corinthians 15:21-22 summarizes it, "For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." The sin of Adam is passed onto all mankind, and the substitutionary death of Christ for all mankind allows forgiveness of sins to be offered to all. If there are other humans who are not descended from Adam, then they do not fall under the curse of Adam and the death of Christ does not apply to them. Yet the Bible is clear that the death of Christ applies to all mankind, therefore all must be descended from Adam.

    • @Macion-sm2ui
      @Macion-sm2ui Год назад

      @@cowboycurtis2229 Well, actually very convincing explanations. I don't agree only with the last part. Existance of other people do not exclude theory, that god created other human, but all of them ultimately mixed with Adam descendents. Especiallt if there were only few other in the very beginig of the word. But anyway, I'm not gonna arguing about this, as for me that is not an important issue.

  • @GrahamPlaysMC
    @GrahamPlaysMC 5 месяцев назад

    I feel like this video summarizes the old testament of the bible quite well for a 35 minute video, definitely learned a lot. Thank you!