Why did the Umayyad Caliphate Collapse?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 июн 2024
- Why did the Umayyad Caliphate Collapse?
♦Consider supporting our work and Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @knowledgia
♦Consider supporting us on Patreon :
/ knowledgia
♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE: goo.gl/YJNqek
♦Our general knowledge channel: / @masteringknowledge
♦Music by Epidemic Sound
Big Thank you to:
Николай Димитров, Tobias Tron, Mahmoud Shahin, Justin Bourke, Augustus Caesar, Chaim laser
Joshua Kerr, Slayer, John McKeon ,Michael Morale,Rory,Smithy3371,The Angry Celt, Paula Collins-Cook, Jonathon Dwigans
#History #Documentary
Actually the end of the video is wrong. The last heir of the Umayyads run away, he took control of Iberia and became caliph of Al-Andalus.
No,, Abd-al-Rahman I became Emir of "Emirate of Cordoba". Abd-al-Rahman III is the one became caliph
Wrong he became the Amir of Cordoba not the caliph because the only caliph is "the Abbasid caliph abi alabas The butsher"
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
I know the story , it' was like a thriller movie
It’s all propaganda fake history anyways, that’s all Islam is, the Abassids created Islam, there’s no historical evidence or record for it before the Abassids
If Caliph Suleiman ibn Abd al-Malik did not desire to fulfill the prophecy by becoming the blessed Muslim commander who will seized Constantinople for Islam according to the prophecy of the Prophet, the Umayyad Caliphate could have saved a lot of money and the rebellion against them might be averted.
The prophet is mostly wrong so they probably didn’t really believe it. That’s why the Umayyads caliphate only lasted a mere 100 years, it was them that organized Islam and the Quran(fixed some of the lies and added more lies)
@@MasteIsIllmaticYet another conspiracy theorist...🤦♂️
@@History_Teller1250 No he isn't! There is no conspiracy theory in his words.
The Awaited Mahdi: What in God’s name? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾
1. Abbasid superiority 2. Catastrophic defeats from the romans 3. Revolts everywhere
Do you mean after they conquered half the roman Empire and all of Persia 😂
@@ibrahimmustafa2481 oh boy here comes rhe copium from arabs lol
@@shadowgod1797 Sounds like you are still trying to cope from the fact that Muslims owned the romans and ended them for good lol
@@shadowgod1797 no it's true tho
@@ibrahimmustafa2481 that doesn't make their comment any less factual, so what's your point exactly? you can conquer half of a country, then still lose key battles to said country that cause another country to wipe yours out because of those battles. unless you're trying to brag about one point in history, to which my question would be.. how'd that work out for you today?
The native berbers of morocco defeated three umayyads army one after one after one after one and you didn't put that in the video specially the berbers of North Africa fight against umayyad caliphate army's for over 70 years non stop in the end the umayyads lost Morocco and Algeria and after 7 years of this the umayyad caliphate get destroyed by the new super power the Abbasid caliphate (non Arabs Persians)
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
Berber never fought umayyad for 70 years old it was just some battles and berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria
Abbasids were Arabs bruh, they were descendants of uncle Abbas of prophet Muhammad,but tolerant towards non-arabs
"of Morocco"
@@ghostd69 handled bent safwan barely only partially maintained the rebellion and within years Sufrites of Warfjuma took over Kairouan deleting out the quraish family. At best Eastern Algeria had remained under their rule for a bit.
One thousand three hundred years have passed, and the Umayyads have gone with it, but still some losers blame them for their modern-day failures, what a great empire!
Ummayad weren’t great neither good they were mfs trash rulers
But losers do you mean us shiites ? Also which failures ? We aren’t failing in the current day , not in the slightest .
We blame muawiya for and yazid for every bad thing today for preventing the rule of the imams ( and therefore would have established the messianic nation back then )
why don't you also mention millions of Zoroastrians that were in Iran under Umayyads?
So True
Most of them converted to Islam and became Muslims; a minority still live in Iran in the city of Yazd, mostly and some went to India
Because this channel is a bit biased. Cherry picking information sometimes instead of the whole picture. Didn't say, mention anything about the help Constantinople received by Khan Tervel and the Bulgarian army who cleared the fields infront of the walls.
@@Thefendi-
Iran did not become a Muslim majority until during Seljuk rule
@@westsidermetalhead4997
Trevel khan and his blugars army did nothing important but rather than attacking an retreated army during their withdrawl and the army were suffering dieases and hungry and cold weather and greek fire playing big role destroying major army
Abu al-Abbas al-Saffah is one of the figures who formed the original institution that had an impact on the Islamic world. He is the one who organized this revolution that became known as the Black Flags Revolution. He was given a nickname by this name, al-Saffah, because of the large amount of blood he shed.
Persian abumuslim killed six hundred thousand Arabs.
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
@@ghostd69 but he killed six hundred thousand Arabs.
Really awesome Video! I have one bit of constructive criticism tho: could you please link your sources in the description in the future? I would love to read more about the topic and it would really install confidence in the truthfullness of you guys' Videos ^^
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
@@ghostd69 yk how someone could proofread the video more easily? By seeing the sources given
@@ghostd69 anyone can edit on wikipedia
10:09So are you telling me that the Berbers, the Spaniards, the Persians, the Egyptians, the Kurds and the Syrians were 10% of the population?😅
thats what im saying
1:44 Stats of the Umuyyad Caliphate, the largest Islamic Arab empire of all time.
6:50 This first Caliph Mu'awaya set the foundatuons for the Umayyad Caliphate to be stable in the future.
Before the third khalifa die he requested help from his cousin but his cousin didn't respond and his main reason for war was because ali wanted to remove him from his place
Are you talking about Wiz?
@@MuffinManUSNwhat is wiz?
Ali infact never tried to remove anyone , he is well known for not revolting against Abu bakr even tho his relatives and followers told him to do so , he did not so the islamic world would not get into fighting eachother , the next rashudin calips were so unpopular that when 3 of them died people Asked ali to come rule , which he did and fighted many rebels.
Ali was treated unfairly as was his sons. 🤷♂️
It’s kind of ironic with how Muslims today, especially the concerts in America seem to become Arabized. They take Arab names and wear Arab clothing even though they live in NYC or Philly.
Its ironic as it’s always been one reason for revolts in the past. The people didn’t like being forced to forget everything from before when they converted to Islam.
It’s also ironic as historically, Muhammad’s family was treated unfairly. Ali and Fatimah as well as Husain and Hassan and the rest of the family were all treated unfairly and you can see that is the case for generations. Treated unfairly by rulers who didn’t like the attention they got.
But now a day the history is ignored 🤷♂️ Muslims have always been their own worst enemies lol
Wow bro you couldn't have said it more. Most of Muslims today choose to follow the ways of the Ummayeds and Abbasid Islam rather the Islam of Muhammad and his ahul al bayt. That's why you see Shia fight for Palestinian while the rest watch, no some of them even help the zionist. @@YaakovEzraAmiChi
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
1:22
You made a fatal mistake
The Umayyads were not defeated in the Zab by Abu Muslim, but by Abdullah bin Ali, a member of the Abbasid dynasty.
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
@@ghostd69
I literally began to suspect that these channels depend on Wikipedia as the primary source of information
The funny thing is that even Wikipedia says that the army that put the Abbasids in power was Arab
"Most of the Khorasani soldiers who brought the Abbasids to power were Arabs.[160]"
@@Faisal-pb5guthen who were khorashani???
@@rambikshprasad4648
Iranian and turks. But we talking about arabs tribes and army living in khoursan
@@ghostd69
Khorasani is a geographical description, like a Syrian or Iraqi description, not linked to a specific ethnicity
They took Jizya from new Muslims, so they didn't rule by what Allah revealed.
seriously??? i didn't know that
where can i find evidence of that
Good video !
Thanks.
Would have liked a more detailed coverage of the Battle of Zab but it did give me a nice overview.
Video on Decline of Abbasid caliphate????
هناك العديد من الاخطاء مثل ان الخلافة يجب ان تكون لشخص ينحدر من نسب مباشرة فلم يكن ابو بكر و لا عمر و لا عثمان يعتبروا ممن ينحدر حتى معاوية من ناحية النسب اقرب للنبي من عمر و ابو بكر
ايضا معاوية لم تحدث في عهده الكثير من الاضطرابات و اذا حدثت فكان يتعامل معها باللين حتى انه كان مضرب المثل بالصبر و الحلم على من يظلمونه اما القمع بعنف و وحشية حدثت في عهد عبدالملك بن مروان و ابنه الوليد
طبعا الكثير من الاخطاء الاخرى لكنها كثيرة ،ارجو ان يؤخذ ما اقوله و ان تاخذ من المصادر الصحيحة
والله جدا استغربت من المعلومات والمغالطات في هذا الفيديو. ونشرت تعليقا بالانجليزيه تقريبا نفس الكلام الذي انت نشرته.
أغرب ما سمعت: "معاوية كان يخالف تعاليم الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم عندما كان كاتبا له". ما هذه التفاهات؟ ليته ذكر المصادر.... رضي الله عن معاوية وعن ابوه وعن أخوه.
So, basically this video is worthless? Good to know. And thank god for google translate
Why you don't mentioned the backstabbing of the Abu Muslim by the calipha.
Yeah, being assassinated en masse by a rival faction will do that to you
The largest Muslim empire ever in history and the second greatest one!
You should have included the Great Berber revolt and the Murji'ah rebellions in Persia/Khorasan and the Kharijite rebellions of the Iraqi marshes and Najid and the Zaydi Shia revolts
What do you expect from ignorant people North Africa Barbaria or Tamazgha was the graveyeard of Arab armies. Also the Battle of Tours and Poitiers in which many Umayyad soldiers died had an impact on the Umayyads
@@mauromaurito532
All those revolt was crushed Berber berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria and battle of tour or poitiers is same battle it was skrmkish and party raid didn't impact on umayyad and umayyas was countine with raid into francia after that battle
@@ghostd69 no not true Tunisia remained under Arab authority but the whole of Algeria and Morocco and Mauretania was ruled by Amazigh tribes the Kutama and Senhaja tribes ruled eastern Algeria the Fatimids who ousted the Aghlabids were helped by the Kutama who lived in Eastern Algeria
@@ghostd69 no after the Battle of Tours and Poitiers which was due to the arrogance of the Arab racistst never never dared the Muslims go north to France or Belgium there is even a large graveyeard called Balat Al Shuhada look it up. The Warfajuma berbers also attacked North Tunisia
@@mauromaurito532
East algeria was also under umayyad and battle al asnam took place in west algeria crushed berber and also abd rahman al fahiri marched into west algeria and entered telemcen and cities around chasing down rest of berber rebles. Kutama and sanhaja was also crushed by abbasid general mohamed ibn al ash't al khouzai
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about Aumayyad empire collapsed by Abbassid revolutionary armies...video clearly explained all reasons which imposed people's backed Abbassid assaults against former Aumayyed government from khorasan to Iran and Iraq....Aumayyed empire economic, society tyranny was unthinkable and horrible comparably to previous Rashedden caliphate Era....even in Syria
Finest work!
Crazy what you can get people to believe with enough violence
Crazy How People Dont Know Even A Bit About History But Still Say Their Opinion As If They Are 100% Right
@user-hv2jb1zq1r it's all an Op-Ed anymore
Crazy how humans attacks other religios groupe, but forget, that christians even killed, rape and Forced conversion. The juws are was the First one….
He clearly mentioned that the majority of the Umayyad population were non-Muslims and that's the Umayyads were tolerant to other faiths..
The 'violence' mentioned in the video was suppressing revolutions... Because well allowing them would break the country into pieces
@@user-hv2jb1zq1r Yeah totally agree with you.
They were in places they weren’t supposed to be
That's why we keep Bleach around
Kind of like today
As if romans and Byzantine greeks belonged to North Africa, middle east, gaul, breton?
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
Did you even made the effort to watch the video ?
killing eachother during prayers shows how seriously these guys took their religion 😂
11:29 And also with the help of Khan Tervel and the Bulgarian army who sandwiched the Umayyad army against the walls of Constantinople.
Nah they only attacked after the Romans did no less than 100% of the work
The Bulgars just saw a way to get some loot.
@@westsidermetalhead4997
Trevel khan and blugars army didn't do anything they didn't apporach consantinople wall till arab withdrawl, blugars attacked umayyad during their retreat they didn't help in raise of siege on city
It's not Spain. It's the Iberian peninsula. Spain did not exist yet then.
Hispania
Does it really matter bro?
@@nuncasaberas5926Yup Hispania.
Hispania or Iberian Peninsula
@@nuncasaberas5926Hispania is given by romans.
Very interesting
Do a video on the Dabuyid Dynasty.
This battle took place not far from my city.
Why u don't mentioned zoroastrians that were in iran?
Why should he mention them?
@@Mohammed-jf2sp
Because majority of Iranians were Zoroastrian
@@PatriotOfPersia And what does this have to do with the topic?
@@Mohammed-jf2sp
You don't need to prove that you are an Arab by saying nonsense.
@@PatriotOfPersia I don’t blame you hating for Arabs, they overthrew your empire, which you are proud of, but the real stupidity is what the world sees every year, the Iranians beating themselves with chains and crying because of the death of a person 1400 years ago.
Cool!
Carthage vs Rome 2
Short answer: it grew too large in a short time.
it's not 100 % of correct story but it's good video for non Muslims and non Arab to understand some of Middle East long History 👍🏼
Does the Umayyads have something to do with Islam?
Changing teams and being "caliph" with violence. Being racist and murdering your political opponents Has nothing to do with Islam...
Technicaly No , cause they were not even connected to prophet himself
Of course it did 😏 Umayyads drove the final nail into the Sunni-Shia Schism 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 to bring an end to the Fitna Wars 🤪
@@tnrz5696 Do you understand my question?
@@sulemanmanaffabdul4699 yes i'm sure that my answer is good enough
Emmm I got a qurstion by the way if there the ummayad were stereotyping their people why did not the people take advantage of the civil war ?
You didn't mention the Great Berber revolt against Umayyad arabs' tyranny ...
Look it's a western wannabe.
Oh the berbers, the pioneers of human freedom...oh wait they were a slaver nation
@@Based_Beeastlook it's an "eastern" sigma wannabe
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614At least he is a sigma not gay.
@HH-yj3jc
At least his alfa not a pedophile
Wow!!!This is a fascinating video of how the Umayyad Empire crumbled systematically after not even a centrury of ruling,good friends!!!:-D
They were nonetheless a very influential empire, you gotta acknoweledge that
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614acknowledgia
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 altho i think the abbasid which started the islamic golden age were even more influential
They spread Islam ,most of the theological , scientific and intellectual things were in Abbasid era not to mention their heritage to other Islamic states such as Seljuks, Mamluks and Ottomans@@user-hv2jb1zq1r
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614
Abbasid took knoweldge from umayyad and their gov system and etc they learnt many things from umayyad
Moroccan Berber revolt of 740 broke the Umayyads back. Shocked there is no mention of this.
It wasn’t a “Moroccan” revolt since Morocco didn’t exist back then. And the Berbers failed to take the Umayyad provincial capital of Kairouan.
Moroccan? Lol. Morocco didn’t even exist. Stop embarrassing yourself Bousbirian.
@-Blast
But the fatimed berbers take kairawan and the all of Tunisia
@@-BlastIt was Moroccan since vast majority of the rebelliers were from Morocco and by the way Morocco existed as the kingdom of Mauretania
@@blutherhood3893Kingdom of Mauretania isn't related to the Moroccan identity which started with the Idrisids.
Mauretanian tribes were also in nowdays Algeria and Numdian tribes were also present in nowdays Morocco.
You Moroccan nationalists and Algerian nationalists shoudn't touch our Berber history.
Alot of Houara Berbers and Ifranid Berbers in the Trara, Aures mountains formed around half of all Berber rebels
Next time make a video about the Great Berber revolt
The ʿAbbasids were descended from an uncle of Muhammad. Seeing the weaknesses of the Umayyads, they declared a revolt in 747. With the help of a coalition of Persians, Iraqis, and Shīʿites, they put an end to the Umayyad dynasty with a victory against them at the Battle of the Great Zab River in 750.
“MUCH of Asia”??? Bruh, the Middle East isn’t MUCH of Asia.
apparently whiever wrote this script doesn’t know Asia includes China, Mongolia, Central Asia, India, Southeast Asia, Japan, Siberia, Tibet… MUCH of Asia, my foot.
stop with the western-centric view of the world.
In the ancient world, Asia's borders ended with China, no one in the heart of world knew what was beyond that
@@Alqoaity Lol, so everyone was scared of going beyond the unknown lands?? 😂
Battle of the Great Zāb River in today's Iraq on January 25, 750 AD, was Abu Muslims Abbasid Caliphate with capital
Kufa in today's Iraq VICTORY against the Umayyad Caliphate with capital Harran in today's Turkey.
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali and abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia
@@ghostd69 Merw in today's Turkmenistan became the capital of the Umayyad province of Xwarāsān (661-750). Throughout the Abbasid era (750-861), Merw remained the capital and most important city of Xwarāsān. The battle of the Great Zāb River changed the ruling dynasty in Merw.
You didnt even mentioned the main leader of this revolutionary which he was Persian abu muslim khorasani (behzadan pur vandad)
He was the main reason of umayyid defeat !! And later he got murdered by the second abbasid caliphate al mansur beacuse of the arabs fear of his powers and popularity !!
He was mentioned in the video and even claimed that he was the one who defeated the Umayyads in Zab, although all Arab sources state that the one who defeated the Umayyads was Abdullah bin Ali, a member of the Abbasid dynasty.
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
true abu muslim regreted he helped arabs that he should have helped his fellow persians to take over persia again instead of helping abbasids what a shame
@@shadowgod1797
He did not regret that he helped the Arabs
He regretted killing thousands of Muslims. You can read the correspondence between him and Caliph Al Mansur. He did not talk about Arabs, Persians, or any of the modern nationalist nonsense.
In any case, he died as a scum begging pardon for his life from the Caliph
@@shadowgod1797
Helping arabs ? Without abbasid support abu muslim wouldn't do anything he was mawali to arab tribe working to them as an clothing trader and thanks to arab tribes who revolt aganist umayyad and delcaring in thrid fitna before abbasid start their revolt, he tried to take over persia but abu jafar al mansour stopped him plus he wasn't nationlist he was just Pledge of allegiance to abbasid
I see that the Umayyads just were not liked by people
Abu Muslim Abd al-Rahman ibn Muslim [1] was a Persian[2][3] general who led the Abbasid Revolution that toppled the Umayyad dynasty, leading to the establishment of the Abbasid Caliphate.
The video did not point anything about the Persian man who overthrow Umayyid caliphicate...
@@he4620
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali. abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia. more than half abbasid army was made up of arab tribes of iraqi and khoursan even majority general was arabs only 2 persian abu muslim and ibn awn. Qatahba ibn shabib is arab was the main general carried out on major abbasid revolt he took persia and iraq from umayyad for final battle which its zab was lead by another arab abdallah ibn ali. Many sources agreed on it such as chrincole of 757 and islamic sources confirmed it was abdallah ibn ali who lead like al tabari in his book history of al tabari vol 7 page 432 and ibn kathir book Al Bidaya wan Nihaya vol 13 page 254 and 255 and many historians agreed there is no mention of abu muslim in battle of zab wikipdia is not realiable sources menioned name abu muslim in battle of zab in wikipdia page made by iranian probganda
Lets jump how umayyad was fell during thrid fitna occured 745 the princes of umayayd cousin was fought each other in throne and conflicts rivlary between al Qays and Yaman fighting each other in khoursan and iraq, although marwan managed to kill 3 princes fighting in throne Al Walid II and yazid III and ibrahim who caused fitna and people of levantine was getting upest due umayyad goverment drove into corruption, when marawn was unable to end internal conflicts he decided to abandon damascus capital of umayyad that was main power for umayyad and moved capital Harran leaving fitna to be on going till abbasid took advantage established their revolution in 747 and announcement of establishment their state. not trying down playing marawn was great he leading succesfully champigan aganist khazar and bezntyine and arabs khwarijies but he did mistake but moving capital and leaving fitna on going which on of main reason islamic sources called him " the donkey " if he didn't such stupid thing like that abbasid wouldn't came into existence.
Actually no Islamic source says that a caliph must be from the prophet's family lineage.
Didn't the Umayyads rule the Iberian Peninsula for some time after that?
Moroccan Berbers killed the Umayyad elite forces, and consequenced other rebillions to happen.
The fact: in every second he said that a huge number of soldier was christian😂❤
Bro in sasanid era
The christians of iran was heavily forced to became zoroaster or didn't spread their religion and the one of the causes of these moves was that christian populations in iran hasbeen assmilated
so why u said many of the soldier of abbasids were christian
Then why u instead did not said they were zoroasters?
or THEY WERE NON-ARAB MUSLIMS WHO WERE IRANIANS THAT CONVERTED TO ISLAM?
So technically Spain has legitimacy 😂
It's Morocco that caused the collapse of the Umayyad empire, Moroccan Berbers killed the Ummayad elite forces that the Abassids wouldn't be able to overcome and also caused other rebellions.
The racist policy of the Umayyads caused the fall of the Umayyad Empire also the treatment of Berbers like for instance the demands of Jizzyah and slaves to the Muslim Berbers was the straw and provoked a catastrophic revolt
CORRECTIONS.
1- IT WAS NOT ABBSIDS ARMY BUT IT WAS THE AB ARMY MAINLY OF PERSIANS LATER THEY HANDED THE KINGDOM TO ABBSIDS BEACUSE THE ISLAMIC LAWS ALLOW ONLY THE HASHIMAT ONLY TO RULE.
2- UMMAYED ARMY HAD A LOT OF CHRISTIANS IN IT, BEACUSE LEVANT MAINLY WERE CHRISTIANS.
3- BOTH ARMIES WERE NAINLY NOT ARABS.
Islamic law in it's early form the Ruler was to be from Quraish not Hashem sepcificly
The soldiers were Muslims from the yamanite Arab tribes who migrated to Syria after the destruction of Ma'rib dam and after the conquest they converted to Islam and Muawiyah established his relations with them after the Plague of amwas when he was a governer of Syrian in the late caliphate of Umar and Uthman
They were Arabs but the Abbasid were mixed from Arabs who are from Iraq, Arabs who lived in Iran and Iranians who converted to Islam
@@BESTINTHEWORLD0007 THE MINSTERS IN UMMAYED COURTS WERE CHRISTIANS LIKE SURJOHN AND THE WRITTING IN UMMAYED STATE WAS FOLLOWING ROMANS DEWAN UNTIL LATELY WAS CHANGED TO ARABIC. YOU DO NOT EXPECT PEPOLE SUDDENLY CHANGE THEIR RELIGION EVEN رو THE ARABS WERE CHRISTIANS SLOWLY THE MAJORITY CONVERTED TO ISLAM. ABU MUSLIM ALKORSANI INTENTION WAS TO GIVE THE RULE OF ISLAMIC WORLD TO BIN HASHIM, BUT BIN HASHIM DIDN'T WANT TO RULE AT THOSE TIME, THEN ABO MUSLUM GIVE TO THIER COUSINS THE ABBSIDS.
5:22
What? All of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali may Allah be please with them, didn't come from direct lineage to Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him... where did you get that information from?
Like Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, Muawiyah may Allah be pleased with him is a distant cousin of Muhammad peace be upon him.
5:28
Again, WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? How can he oppose the prophet's beliefs? He would be immediately charged with blasphemy and the companions of the prophet will absolutely not tolerate such acts (death sentence most likely). Where are you getting this information from? And for you to portray it as "a matter of fact".
If you are citing your ridiculous information from Shia sources, then that explains the exagerrated resentment they have for Muawiyah may Allah be pleased with him.
This is nonsensical and unprofessional...🤢
6:05 this is getting ridiculous. He is totally getting his information from Shia sources only. Not only that, he is totally misinterpreting the shia sources, making ridiculous conclusions shias didn't even claim...
I am Syrian, may God have mercy on our ancestors Hisham bin Abdul Malik, Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel, Muslima bin Abdul Malik, and many grandparents 💔🇸🇾
12:11
Another mistake
The revolution was not in Persia (western Iran), but in Khorasan (eastern Iran), a place where the Persians were always a minority. Most of the revolutionaries were Shiite Arabs (descendants of the Arabs who were displaced from Iraq in the era of Muawiyah I)
Persians were minority in khorasan?😂😂😂even today the population is majority persian speaking
@@darthpigeon
At that time they were a minority
The majority of the Khorasanis spoke the Sogdian, Bactrian, and Khwarezmian languages
Dari Persian spread after Islam under the rule of the East Iranian/Turkic dynasties
@Faisal-pb5gu depends on what part of khorasan you're speaking if we speaking the western part of khorasan(which was the most populated part) persian had become the major language replacing parthian by the late years of sassanids
Far west was Portugal.... 8:22 Portugal is the oldest country in europe. Why talk spain if Portugal is older?
Probably because Cordoba the most prominent city in Al-Andalus was in Spain and not Portugal and it held more Importance.
Yeah, but not politics.
3:45
how did the Prophet Muhammed die in 632ad?
that doesn't make any sense to me.
the bc ad calender is divided by the 30 or so years Jesus was alive.
so how is the Prophet Muhammed supposed to have lived according to this video almost 6-7 centuries after Jesus passed away?
it doesnt make any sense to me
i was always taught what eventually became Islam was begun when the Jewish/Hebrew/Persian/Babylonian wherever he was from originally Patriarch of Israel Abraham sent away Ishmail when Sarah finally became pregnant and went against her word and forced him to send away Ishmail and his mother into the desert/wilderness, and i was always taught/under the impression that it was only a few generations later the Islam rose up and that Islam was almost as old as Judaism/Israel itself and older by far then modern Christianity?
but this video is implying that Christianity is 7 centuries almost older then Islam is? i don't understand.
The Empire Umayyad is Syria 🇸🇾❤
The franks helped abassids against omyads
5:30 name ONE belief that Muawiyah opposed as a scribe??????
What's with the overdone constant emphasis. We're all adults that dont need to be pandered to
There is a lot of mistakes in this video
I'm Algerian.
Our country wasn't named "North Africa" but "Africa".
Africa meant the Maghreb back then, not the subsaharan countries.
And the first successful rebellion against the Umeyyads happened in our country, as early as the 740s (ten years before the Abbassids), with the Rustemid caliphate, with Tahert (Tiaret) as its capital.
They are not you it's Maysara Al Madghari that started tge rebellion and then Khalid Ibn Hamid Ezznati that completed it witg a vast majority of Moroccan Berber forces especially from what would be known as Burghwata later and with Moroccan war tactics and leadership, you and Ifriqiyyans lost a catastrophic loss in the battle of Al Asnam
@@blutherhood3893 isn't Tahert in modern Algeria ?
@@user-jt8vj1vm6y Now you skipped all I aid to talk about the location, the location i just a location and isnot necessarily related to the part of the battle
@@blutherhood3893 you could be right that the ibadite movement originated in the Atlantic coast of modern morocco.
Because that area wasn't Christian and converted to Islam in the early 700s, just after the Arab invasion.
The region of Tiaret was part of the kingdom of Altava and the Mauro-Roman kingdom and was Christian for at least 3 centuries.
It seems unlikely that the people of that area would convert to islam so quickly and establish an islamic kingdom.
Also, Rustum is a persian name. So it was a persian who preached ibadite islam to ex-polytheists from the Atlantic coast, and they established their capital inside the ex-kingdom of Altava, whose population was probably still majority Christian.
berber revolt was eventually crushed in battle al asnam and al qarn, algeria was remain under umayyad and people of tanger in morcco pledge of allegiance to handela ibn safwan who crushed berber revolt in battle al asnam in chlef modern algeria
Because they didn’t believe in Allah hard enough
🇸🇦❌🇮🇷✅Iranian Abu Muslim Khorasani overthrew the Umayyad caliphate and defeated their powerful army and brought the Abbasids to power, but the Abbasids killed her, the Arabs never had honor🇮🇷
He was not only the commander, but also the leader of the movement against the Umayyads, I wish he would have become the king himself.
Why are people right over the details when the whole establishment of Arab supremacy and Muslim dominance of other religions has brought destruction and death to so many ^^ yes, arithmetics, medicine and universities are great, theocracy and racism, not so much.
P.s caliph Ali killed by a traitor follower
Caliph muayaa never ever had been against any things of the prophet Muhammad belief
And the caliphate is never ever dependent on how much you related to prophet Muhammad , the three first caliphs had not related by blood to the prophet
Finally, I'm Syrian 😅 and Syria in that time won't be called Syria it's called Al Sham and it's Include Palestine, Jordan and Syria 😅
سوریا کانت تسمی سوریا حسب لهجه الارامیین العروبیین ولیس سریان ولکان الاسماعلیون اسموها شام
الخلفاء القرشیین کلهم یربطهم نسب بالنبی محمد ولیس فقط علي
Ummayids were Arian Christians. Islam was created by the Abbasids.
Imam hussain was responsible
Im 1st
1 min
"The Caliphate was extremely tolerant with other faiths!" ...cough...jizyah tax...cough...
Tolerant COMPARED to their contemporary. Take, say, 19th century Russian Empire with Kosher Tax, and (occasionally) conscriptions, plus pogroms.
The umayyad caliphate even forced jizya on Muslims native berbers
Maybe they are tolerant for other faiths with same race but we are pretty sure that they weren't tolerant with the non-Arab Muslims
@@samiman5606 please post your sources on that claim.
They didn't really care about your religious they just wanted a reason to tax you...some became Muslims but they still taxed them
Absolutely not first
Romans taking 500 years for their empire : Umayyad which took 60 years : 🗿
yea. Really proves the point of being a religion of peace
What's this supposed to even mean
@@JoeyP946Islamic Political Influence spreading by the sword doesn't equal that the religion itself is spreading by the sword and the Ummayad Caliphate's population was Christian Majority. Cope
@@RamRami238 hahahaha. Without lies Islam dies!
The main religion of the Umayyad Caliphate was Islam. The Umayyad Caliphate, which ruled from 661 to 750 CE, was the second of the four major caliphates established after the death of the Prophet Muhammad. The Umayyad rulers were Muslim and governed according to Islamic principles and laws.
@@RamRami238 Expansion of the Islamic Empire: The Umayyads significantly expanded the Islamic empire, spreading Islam across a vast territory that included parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe.
Administration and Governance: They implemented an administrative system influenced by both Islamic principles and the existing Byzantine and Sassanian models. Arabic was made the official language of administration.
Religious Practices: The Umayyad Caliphate supported the construction of mosques and Islamic centers of learning. Major cities such as Damascus, the capital, became important centers of Islamic culture and education.
Very sad how the undoing of every Islamic Empire is Muslim infighting. Perhaps if there was a more stable and method of passing leadership that doesn't breed corruption, there wouldn't be succession crisis and anger at the lack of political transparency
You made a lot of fatal errors , I’m disappointed on why you using Wikipedia as source material.just delete the whole video because it’s historical fiction not historical facts.
Best Video Yet
Also 75th comment my first :)
Reconquista fue la solucion .
solution to what?
Solution that couse in you low birth rates right now?
@@samiman5606the only reason your cult survive😂 sad😂
@manikandankumaran1012
Well at least my cult gives my people over 6 bebes each women joke to you with no bebes
@@samiman5606that's what roaches do.
🇮🇷🇦🇫abu muslim❤❤❤
Remember the Syrian Umayyad Empire that burned Persia 🔥
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali and abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia
@@user-ox5kw7mz5r
Abu muslim never ever lead or was involving in battle of zab!! It was abdallah ibn ali and abu muslim only took over merv and hold abbasid flag. read my comments because its based of historical sources not from wikipdia
@@user-ox5kw7mz5r
You saying history? Ok show me those historical facts instead relying in wikipdia? The army mostly arabs and abbbasid revolt lead by major arabs commanders and main chief of general in revolt qatahba and abdallah ibn ali i gave you sources
@@user-ox5kw7mz5r
We accept history from realiable sources not from wikipdia and battle was lead by abdallah ibn ali not abu muslim and most soldiers were arabs
Based abbasid the greatest revelation in history who destroyed the strongest and biggest empire in history(it their time) in only 3 years
💪☪️
Desert ra😂
@@rajsekharkarajada9830And these desert men conquered most of the known world in a century. What did you achieve to laught like this ?
When well the arabs learn.
Arabs they never learned they will always make the same mistakes
I hate to write it but...first
I hate that you wrote it
@@MuffinManUSN sorry but I had to
Why did you do us like that
@@micahcook165 I'm sorry ok? I couldn't resist doing it i think I'm possessed or something
@mohammedchan4352 That doesn't make it right. I just sold both my vehicles and purchased an E-Bike now. I don't have a helmet and only 1 Elbow and 1 knee pad. Now as I text and ride my "vehicle" I'm at risk for injuries because of what you did.
Forgiveness is not likely.
The Abbasids are actually 99% Iranians and the family of the prophets blood line. The family of the prophet unhappy about not being at the top of the Ummayads allied with the Iranian people dissatisfied about the fact that they have no right to lead the caliphate as Iranians. Ummayads kept the caliphate among Arabs.
This was the Abbasid revolution on its way. Abbasid laid the foundation for Islamic golden age.
99% persian 😂 in ohio
Fun fact: One of the reason for abbasid revolt is the siege of Qistantinia because the ummayads were tooo invincible
Istanbul didn’t exist until after WW1. It was always called as Constantinople by Christians and Muslims and Muhammad. Only the secular Turks changed its name after the caliphate was abolished.
@@DivineAegis02 I know right, they're so disrespectful.
@DivineAegis02 I will call it qistantinia sorry for calling it Istanbul 24/7 everyone on social media calls it Istanbul even beta squad
@@AlphaSections sorry
Hey, make video about Indonesia please. As an Indonesian, Islam didn't really come with trade especially to what happened with my ethnic groups, an indigenous ethnic group in the middle of Sumatran jungles and Bukit Barisan mountain range near the largest vulcanic lake in the world. In 1539, Acehnese Sultanate invaded my ancestors's land when one of our king refused Islam. Aceh faced difficulties during the war then they bought & hired Ottoman weapons & mercenaries to invade us. In the 1810s during Padri War, an Islamic civil war in Minangkabau, Padri soldiers heard a cannibalistic pagan tribes in the middle of North Sumatra remained as pagans, Padri soldiers invaded our kingdom and massacred 200.000 people even executed our king for not accepting Islam, they brutally ransacked our villages/cities & massacred my ethnic groups who refused their religion. They were failed to conquer us when a cholera outbreak happened thanks to dead bodies that leaked cholera. After they failed to conquer us, our ancestors were devastated after watching our ransacked kingdoms and dead relatives even cholera outbreak happened and severely decimated our population. My ancestors became hostile towards outsiders/foreigners. Years later, a couple of US Baptist missionarists came and introduced Christianity. Too bad, the locals thought they were another hostile foreigners/outsiders and they caught & ate them. Before Christianity came, my people were pagans who had cannibalistic culture/rituals. My ancestors conducted cannibalism towards people who did terrible crimes such as rape, murder, or treason. POWs were also eaten back then. Before Christianity, my ancestors believed if we ate people, it'd grant us magical strength. We also did child sacrifice ritual by sacrificing li'l boys to gain black magic. Besides cannibalism and child sacrifice, my ancestors were known as jewellery makers and weavers. A German missionarist came and introduced Christianity among my people. He built schools, hospitals, etc. But a lot of kingdom citizens hated him coz Christianity could destroy our culture and religion such as our cannibalistic rituals. There're some reports that some people tried to assassinate him to stop Christianity from destroying our old faiths and culture but failed. Cannibalism and child sacrifice were eventually banned when Dutch colonial regime imposed anti cannibalism law towards us after annexing us in the 1907. If Christianity never came, perhaps my people would still do capital punishment in form of cannibalism and child sacrifice. Unlike other Indonesian regions which were colonized for 350 years, we only got conquered in 1907 when Dutch soldiers succesfully assassinated our priest king. Dutch faced difficulties at fighting a cannibalistic nation in the middle of Sumatran jungles near the largest lake in Indonesia. Many historians keep using my country's history as propaganda while ignoring their brutality towards an indigenous ethnic group in Sumatra who were known as cannibalistic pagan tribes before Christianity
L indonesia, ur country has no history
Source: trust me bro lmao.
You made a lot of effort to make up some false history. 10 points for creativity.
@@user-ft7bj4wv3y remember Austronesian civilizations? 😆😆😆
@@msh-l33t dude, why do u think we r the only largest Sumatran peoples who refused Islam?
@@epg96 isn't 99.5 percent of Indonesia muslim?
Because allah is not God
It literally means God in Arabic.
There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.
True. So many religions and different beliefs@@fresh-eggs
@@fresh-eggs you should say scientific evidence
@@jazimjamal7634 Nope. Because I am not making a case for science.
Its collapse was inevitable.
Forced conversion, seeing Non-Arabs as inferior, I can list more. The Abbasids were way better, no forced conversions, no racism...
Religious freedom? You are kidding. Only if the non-Muslims paid the jizya, or converted, or left, else got your head chopped off - as described in the Islamic books.
What is wrong with paying jizya and living with your belief? U pay less than muslims, not obliged to take part in war, and if you are poor or a monk u are not asked to pay jizya? Is there something wrong with tax jizya?
@@jazimjamal7634 what do you mean “pay less than Muslims?” Jizya was an additional tax. Just like a western country imposing a “Muslim” tax today, which they won’t. If you mean Zakat, then you need to remember that Christians tithed 10%, which is much more than zakat. And of course they were subject to all the taxes and charges that Muslims were otherwise subject to, not permitted to get good job or have any job where they would be boss of Muslims- just the same as it is today in Pakistan and other Muslims countries where this discrimination keeps the minorities in servitude. Imagine the US barring Muslims from being accountant, lawyers, politicians, police etc ! No more taqiyah please.
@@austromyrtus only Islamic taxes were zakat, ushr, jizya and kharaj. Zakat was for muslims, jizya for dhimmi, ushr and kharaj was paid by both.
@@austromyrtus you need to show that minorities suffered under caliphate.
(did this person know that christians during middle age way more violence than caliph 😓)
It is haram to show the faces of the companions of the prophet which is Muawiyah. The prophet would congratulate Muawiyah for his future empire
Why Shia people hate Muawiyah?
@deepworld7 they think he killed ali he did not rather his advisors who killed othman ali did not know when he found out they killed him
May Allah bless ummayad caliphate the way the real deal and spread Islam form china to France , and have been oppressed by the lies done by the Shia appointed writers of the so called Sunni Abbasid caliphate, May Allah bless Muawiyah he got revenge on the killers of caliph Othman and saved Islam , thank you for the video if you want to know real history of Islam check out saber mashhour on RUclips
Bad animation.
Because Allah willed it 🤭
Bro thinks he's funny 💀(oh and btw he did)
@@Tililo I've not even getting warmed up yet 😏 Now that you've brought it up, here we go! Allah willed it that Muawiyah 1 (son of Abu Sufyan) had a hand in the death of Hasan son of Ali 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 & his son Yazid put an end to Mohammad's male line by the death of Husayn son of Ali & brother of Hasan 🤪 Allah willed it ✌🏻
@@johnmockingyou7547 nope slaves
@@johnmockingyou7547 uhh allah definitely did not will to kill the prophet direct descendants , please get your sources right this is a historic video not a religious +there are much more example just like the muawiyah coming into power in history , get over it kid its history
@@johnmockingyou7547and ? Are you thing you are funny or only want to beliefe ?
Time.
No empire lasts forever *wink* *wink* USA
Good thing we're a Federal Republic and and not an empire then.
USA isn't even an empire
@@AlphaSections No america is a empire
It was God’s will.
It is impossible for me to say "God be pleased with him" to Muawiyah after kniwing the terible things he has done, not just he fought imam Ali but his evil doings of changing the real caliphate to a kingdom or empire make us muslims still suffer it till this day
رضی الله علی معاویه و علي ولعنک الله انت