Thank you for this superb radio play so well narrated. From a boring accountant to the murder of his wife. Diabolical revenge on Gwen and Baker. Ruth Rendell superb. Xxx❤❤❤
I hadn’t thought about spoilers when I wrote my comment and wouldn’t want to spoil it for others. The pity is that it makes it impossible to discuss a story afterwards, which is part of the fun. Maybe we should start comments with SPOILER ALERT?
People shouldn't need to complain about 'spoilers' if they listened before tucking in to the comments. Wonder what dinner is like at theirs, coffee & chocolates for starters?
@@wendewarren5535 Really? Hummm . I'm still stumped. So hubby planted the hair - button on her & killed her? Did train hit her. I listened to end 3 times. Ok. The title Then is he the people that don't do such things? 🙄
I don't think it's right to say that justice was served. It seems that Arthur killed his wife and used all those items she collected to frame the writer. It's still murder, even if she did not the right thing
Support the Channel here: buymeacoffee.com/old.time.radio
Thank you, short or long form by Ruth Rendell are great reading, listening to.. again and again!
Ruth was such a wonderful write any younger people who haven’t heard of inspector Wexford series look them out if you like this
Brilliant. Good that just desserts were served! Very entertaining. Thank you very much. 😊
Heard this few times. Justice served.
We must have listened to different stories.. The last 7 minutes changes everything
Will listen to this drama again as sadly I didn’t understand the ending 🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️.
Thanks for the upload
Brilliant! Thank you
Wonderful
Thank you
Thank you, very entertaining - loved it.❤
Far too many ads which spoiled listening
Excellent!
Very brief and unconvincing treatment of a murder. Squeezed in at the end.
The plot was clear from the beginning with a thinly veiled admission of guilt. Nothing squeezed in, just an unfolding of the story
Thank you for this superb radio play so well narrated. From a boring accountant to the murder of his wife. Diabolical revenge on Gwen and Baker. Ruth Rendell superb. Xxx❤❤❤
Thanks for the spoilers
@@TheSilvercue Exactly!! Now i'm pi$$ed off.
20k, those were the days
Good. Thanks
Very good.
Very good!
Thought the ending but great story 😂
A very interesting ending. Made me think.
Hi, your comment is a spoiler. Unft, I couldn't enjoy the story unfolding. Pls be more considerate. Thank you.
@@moj1338no. Spoilers are uncalled for. People read the comments to see if it's a good recording
@@moj1338It's polite. Comment all you like, just don't solve the mystery. Or do. It's not illegal, just rude.
@moj1338 For instance, you could have commented, "Not sure about the ending, I'm not convinced." No spoiler.
I hadn’t thought about spoilers when I wrote my comment and wouldn’t want to spoil it for others. The pity is that it makes it impossible to discuss a story afterwards, which is part of the fun. Maybe we should start comments with SPOILER ALERT?
I watched this story on tales of the unexpected years ago
Yes. Didn't William Shatner play Reeve Baker?
... Our Angela Rippon Finishes The 10 O'clock' News
Why couldn’t we get radio entertainment like this in the States ?
YOU tell us.
And justice is served ....
Adverts before 2 1/2 mins in.
True. That was a spoiler. Thanks for pointing it out.
People shouldn't need to complain about 'spoilers' if they listened before tucking in to the comments. Wonder what dinner is like at theirs, coffee & chocolates for starters?
@@martas9283 At last ! Someone who says it like it is.
So who killed Gwen?
Her husband
@@wendewarren5535
Really? Hummm . I'm still stumped. So hubby planted the hair - button on her & killed her? Did train hit her.
I listened to end 3 times. Ok. The title
Then is he the people that don't do such things? 🙄
Spoilt for me by so many adds!
I don't think it's right to say that justice was served. It seems that Arthur killed his wife and used all those items she collected to frame the writer. It's still murder, even if she did not the right thing
👌💕
Well now. Hmmm…
These AI pictures are utterly awful: this play is set in 1979, not 1929.