Can you do a simulation of the 50mm KwK38 L/42 against the front of the turret on the KV-2 (a flat part of the front of the turret) at a distance of 100m to 200m? I also have one suggestion, can you specify what variant of tank is shown in your simulations? Nevertheless you still make amazing simulations.
I could do it with pzgr40 since I got right material paramaters for tungsten carbide but pzgr39 would be difficult because of its hardening. I would have to use model made out of like 10 parts all with different hardness to make it semi accurate im still trying to find other methods for doing it. For this video it's regular kv1 that was produced in 1939/1940 without additional armor plate that some later upgrades had.
@@logical128 1. You're probably talking about the 88 kwk 36 since matildas certainly weren't around when tiger 2s were introduced. 2. They were probably hard to take out because the flat part of the armour is small and surrounded by angled plates.
@@panzerofthelake506 yes the short 88 don't have issues penning 80mm plates as long as it isn't angled or a really long distance, and the short 88's have pen around 150-165mm and not 200
@@yuurichito1439 and the Matilda is a small targets, the Soviets considered it better armoured than the KV 1 itself. The steel was probably superior so less spawning from non perforating hits, and it's small.
I had to google Dora's gun, never had any idea someone called Railway gustav gun that way. I could do it as a meme video after i make gustav projectile.
Guns that could potentially penetrate the front of a Tiger.I (Some only at less than 500 metres): British 57mm. L.45 & L.52 6 Pounder gun with APCBC/T & APDS. British 76.2mm. L.58 17 Pounder with APCBC/T & APDS. US 75mm. L.41 with all AT ammo types except with APC-HE. US 76mm. L.53 with all AT ammo types. US 90mm. L.53 with all AT ammo types. Soviet 45mm. L.66 with APDS. Soviet 57mm. L.73 with HVAP & APDS. Soviet 76.2mm. L.42 F-34 with HVAP. Soviet 76.2mm. L.54 Zis 3 with HVAP. Soviet 85mm. L.53 with APHEBC, HVAP & APDS. Soviet 100mm. L.54 BS-3 with all ammo types @ +3 Km. Soviet 122mm. L.46 D-25 with all ammo types. Soviet 152mm. L.38 with all AT ammo types.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag there is little information about square meters, mostly they pierced 88mm, even 100mm armor from a distance of 1 km, but here is a photo of IS2 1944, which withstood 5 hits from Ferdinand from a distance of 1.4-1.5 km and rolled back
@@Ricky_Spanishhhh late war German shells were brittle and shattered frequently, and the late war IS-2 had a very angled upper plate. It's not an unreasonable scenario.
I don't have an accurate model for that one since it uses complicated hardening process that would be very hard to recreate in ansys. Many people did videos already with it but i doubt their accuracy. When I make an accurate model i will start making simulations with it.
Nice simulation. but the Real point is, the soviets had problems with steel quality and crafting. they produced in mass but often lower quality as intended in planing. it did not matter for victory, because they had enough Tanks. So, in the field, their Tanks laked that specifications what resulted in loses
так то ближе к концу войны у немцев качество стали стало как раз хуже чем у советов из за ограниченного количества ресурсов и тигр 2 даже если и имел внушительную толщину брони пробивался очень легко
Minor inconvenience for the driver
Ah shit the driver viewing port
Nah it’s just a Tuesday.
He wouldn't notice.
One might say a significant emotional event
Can you do a simulation of the 50mm KwK38 L/42 against the front of the turret on the KV-2 (a flat part of the front of the turret) at a distance of 100m to 200m? I also have one suggestion, can you specify what variant of tank is shown in your simulations? Nevertheless you still make amazing simulations.
I could do it with pzgr40 since I got right material paramaters for tungsten carbide but pzgr39 would be difficult because of its hardening. I would have to use model made out of like 10 parts all with different hardness to make it semi accurate im still trying to find other methods for doing it. For this video it's regular kv1 that was produced in 1939/1940 without additional armor plate that some later upgrades had.
Launch a person into a Tiger 1 at Mach 10
That would be painfully complicated to make.
Ive seen worse, the Gustav cannon shell vs an M1 Abrams and a Bob Senple tank vs P1000 Ratte
@@cheesyfromindonesia9969 wait a second, some madman launched a Bob Semple against a P1000?
If you don't have enough ammu, you became the ammu, right?
@@BesoffenerIslamist yes basiclly the New Zealand tank in a nutshell
@@Slavkovic_Predrag okay, a frozen chicken :)
This seems more like a short 88 than a long one.
Shouldn't that shell go through like butter anyway?
@@logical128 1. You're probably talking about the 88 kwk 36 since matildas certainly weren't around when tiger 2s were introduced.
2. They were probably hard to take out because the flat part of the armour is small and surrounded by angled plates.
@@logical128 excuse me what
@@panzerofthelake506 yes the short 88 don't have issues penning 80mm plates as long as it isn't angled or a really long distance, and the short 88's have pen around 150-165mm and not 200
Flatpen at like 0 meters
@@yuurichito1439 and the Matilda is a small targets, the Soviets considered it better armoured than the KV 1 itself. The steel was probably superior so less spawning from non perforating hits, and it's small.
Hm... Maybe 600+mm Dora's gun vs bike helmet?
I had to google Dora's gun, never had any idea someone called Railway gustav gun that way. I could do it as a meme video after i make gustav projectile.
Yes, but can you do it again with 75+25 mm KV-1 armour? (KV-1E or KV-1 late production)
And against Tiger 1, because kv-1 never meet Tiger 2
You already have that video at simulation bros youtube channel.
🤓 Sorry I had too
Our grandparents: u bastard, enough flashbacks
The driver in WoT abosulutely turned to mush of what once was a human being:
This is but a mere scratch.
In WT: lost consciousness.
The Tiger 2 penetrates the KV1 at 4 km i think, using the PZgr 40 from even far away.
Was there any vehicle that could pen the front of the tiger that was actually used during the war?
British 32pdr was capable of penetrating tigers hull frontally while Soviet 100 and 122 were capable of penetrating the turret.
Guns that could potentially penetrate the front of a Tiger.I (Some only at less than 500 metres):
British 57mm. L.45 & L.52 6 Pounder gun with APCBC/T & APDS.
British 76.2mm. L.58 17 Pounder with APCBC/T & APDS.
US 75mm. L.41 with all AT ammo types except with APC-HE.
US 76mm. L.53 with all AT ammo types.
US 90mm. L.53 with all AT ammo types.
Soviet 45mm. L.66 with APDS.
Soviet 57mm. L.73 with HVAP & APDS.
Soviet 76.2mm. L.42 F-34 with HVAP.
Soviet 76.2mm. L.54 Zis 3 with HVAP.
Soviet 85mm. L.53 with APHEBC, HVAP & APDS.
Soviet 100mm. L.54 BS-3 with all ammo types @ +3 Km.
Soviet 122mm. L.46 D-25 with all ammo types.
Soviet 152mm. L.38 with all AT ammo types.
@@CZ350tuner we re talking about tiger 2.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag no convention tank shells cound pierce trough the tiger 2 hull9
@@fabio6170 32pdr apds could do it.
Tiger 2 doesnt care about your L stalinium
distance? 1km absolutly oneshot but 1.5 km?
I like your name. Roger is the best part of the show.😇
Some sources state that 1100m/s is around 200m. At 1.5km velocity would be over 900m/s so it would still most likely result in penetration.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag there is little information about square meters, mostly they pierced 88mm, even 100mm armor from a distance of 1 km, but here is a photo of IS2 1944, which withstood 5 hits from Ferdinand from a distance of 1.4-1.5 km and rolled back
@@Ricky_Spanishhhh late war German shells were brittle and shattered frequently, and the late war IS-2 had a very angled upper plate. It's not an unreasonable scenario.
@@Ricky_Spanishhhh Yeah but this is a KV-1 with considerably less armor
The Pzgr40 war very rare because auf Tungsten.
The Pzgr39 was the standard.
Or the HEAT Granade.
Why the hypershot round though??? Wouldnt the normal capped shell be more likely what the tigers actually shooting???
I don't have an accurate model for that one since it uses complicated hardening process that would be very hard to recreate in ansys. Many people did videos already with it but i doubt their accuracy. When I make an accurate model i will start making simulations with it.
KV-2 vs Tiger-1
Hmm it withered away a lot compared to what I anticipated.
Still cut straight through front plate like it wasn’t shit
@@swagguy2171 your point being?
@@विनितकुमार-य5ढ just saying. Don’t be a salty bitch
@@swagguy2171 did a KV 1 level your house or what? Oh, and I am sorry for being a salty bitch, you just reminded me of a whiny Karen.
@@विनितकुमार-य5ढ literally nothing against the kv-1 it’s armor is just no where near good enough against the long 88
Nice simulation.
but the Real point is, the soviets had problems with steel quality and crafting. they produced in mass but often lower quality as intended in planing.
it did not matter for victory, because they had enough Tanks.
So, in the field, their Tanks laked that specifications what resulted in loses
так то ближе к концу войны у немцев качество стали стало как раз хуже чем у советов из за ограниченного количества ресурсов и тигр 2 даже если и имел внушительную толщину брони пробивался очень легко
just an average Monday for the driver
What is the distance, point blank?
It is not surprising, by the time of the appearance of the 1st tiger, it is outdated.
It is a high explosive or piercing?
Armor piercing composite rigid.
KV2 vs tiger 1???
HE round would be difficult to simulate but I will try when I have time.
Wt be like: *riccochet*
Cool
Mild headache
Russian bias right here kv1 armor weak to the 88mm gun or high 75mm guns
1st
Najkompletnije simulacije u smislu projektila i cilja. Jako dobro.
Hvala.