Honestly, Neel Seethi deserves more recognition for his acting. He did a great job in the movie, let alone the fact that he had to act without seeing the actual animals (only puppets and other stand-ins) and that he was a newcomer and this was his first movie.
There’s not a single Disney Remake that I like better than the original, but the work they put into them is extremely admirable and should be appreciated.
Well, when you throw so much money around, its bound to hit some skilled people. But technical skill and talent are two different things: the cgi of jungle book looked fine, but the character designs and human-like faces of the animals looked weird because no one gave enough fucks to stay at it until it was absolutely perfect. And Aladdin is just the cheapest-looking 200 mill movie I've ever seen.
The behind-the-scenes are more magical to me than the actual movies. As much as I don't like the remakes (we all can agree that nothing will top the classics), I have to admit that the work behind them is fantastic
@@klif4755 since the remake come out when i saw ghost death for the first time in remake(which i watched in the original 13 times) I didn't really care i was like meh they shouldn't have remaked that since og players already know whats going to happen next bc they played the first one
I still find it absolutely INSANE that there isn't a Stunt or Stunt Choreography award in the industry! Shame on the people who run it. One of the only professions in film where people actually die while working on movies.
THERE IS! lol The Taurus World Stunt Awards is a yearly award ceremony held midyear that honors stunt performers in movies. It is held each year in Los Angeles.
@TheSportsGuru I know people in the industry who want to be recognized. Doesn't seem fair to them that an outside governing body is telling them what is and isn't worth it. It's a fair point, but considering stunt people already go above and beyond it's silly that there isn't ANY recognition. Not to mention Taurus is coordinated and paid for by people in the industry; stunt companies and personal donations whereas the Academy Awards are backed by 1000's of individuals from every background of film, including the big name film companies and HUGE sponsors. The dangers associated with the job are well understood by the people who do them, its a part of the job they signed up for.
@TheSportsGuru As a former competitive gymnast I know a little something about it 😉 Like I said it's a fair point, but that doesn't diminish the fact that people who actually work in the industry want it. We're all adults here. In fact talking to friend who is a stuntman he said the only downfall would be more education about proper safety on set.
TheSportsGuru We’re an industry that needs more education? Lol! Classic. Nothing like people who aren’t in our business giving arguments about our business. You think the award shows don’t have a class for us because we would try to hard and it would be a competition? Force others into competing when they think it’s a bad idea? Where did you come up with this BS? We don’t force anyone into anything. We are competitive, yes, that’s what makes us better. You want the best on set for certain stunts. Yes we have the Taurus awards and we are also recognized by the Screen Actors Guild but we don’t show up on set thinking of gee, I have to go big to get an award. That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard in awhile. 🤦🏻♂️ We have directors and scripts that require us to build action sequences to match story points. That’s our job, to create dynamic action as safely and daring as the story, director and budget demands. It’s very choreographed depending on the sequence and can be very dangerous but we are a team on set, we look after one another like family. At the end of the day we all want to go home without any injuries. That’s what it’s about. Sure some of us may be recognized at a later date for a daring stunt but we do not go to work on a normal day thinking about award shows. Maybe you shouldn’t be here giving answers to questions or a business you don’t have experience in.
"everything the audience loved" u know what I loved? mulan being a strong woman who was able to climb up the ranks with pure determination and hard work and seeing her do this, not through superpowers.
The scenery was beautiful. I didn't really care for the lion king remake because the animals seemed to have limited facial expressions. Also, I enjoyed the voice cast of the original than I did the remake.
@@kittenkittycat1687 , Its funny that Disney broke one of the principles of animation that was created by the animators in the same company. I think that they might have forgot that they are reviving an ANIMATED film which focuses more onto exaggeration that shows expressions.
neel sethi's acting was so impressive in the jungle book and it's exponentially more amazing when added the fact that he was acting alone and on pure imagination and i'm kinda PISSED he's underappreciated
Yeah, just wonder how come the kids that acts amazingly perfect without their parents being there? Wow. (Perhaps their parents is there but oh well, who knows right?),
6:26 They aren’t “extras”, they’re highly trained stuntmen, riggers and technicians. “Extras” or “background” are people who are there to provide atmosphere and generally do things that any average person can do and that requires little direction.
The live-action version of Cinderella is my favorite of the remakes. The roles were all cast perfectly. Cate Blanchett added dimension to the evil stepmother so she wasn’t a run of the mill villain.
“The Lion King” doesn’t count as live action because none of it is actually practical or shot on a set. It’s all CGI, so technically it’s just a hyper realistic animated film.
You should check out the RUclips channel Corridor Crew, they have some 'Visual artists react to bad and great CGI' videos. That's where I learned that the T-rex shot was successful despite the low tech capabilities, because of the wet gloss of the rain and the way most of it was cast in shadow. Much easier to make that look real than something in clear daylight, and much more terrifying! As for the rest, some velociraptor cuts were humans in suits, and the ill triceptacores was an animatronic rigged to blink and breathe.
It's not nostalgia, some of the remakes really are just poorly made. The worst one was probably The Lion King. It's a shot for shot remake but they completely removed the emotion and the expression of the setting and characters because they were going for "realism". Mixing realism with these cartoon characters was a really bad idea to begin with. You don't have to be blinded by nostalgia to know that.
@@t6kr958 well I enjoyed both movies. The original and the remake. It's two different art forms to tell the same story. Which one is better? Well I really dont know becuase essentially I was watching the same movie twice. but I can say I did appreciate both
I remember when my sister told me they are making a live action Beauty And The Beast a couple years ago. I said to her,” I wonder how they will do Aladdin, because it has a lot of hard stuff that would be difficult to bring to life. Like the flying carpet and stuff!” Yet here we are...
The Hobbit released a lot of behind the scenes videos. I have the extended version that came with about 2/3 discs per movie of just behind the scenes stuff
I feel bad when movies aren’t appreciated bc the amount of work that goes into it, but that’s why sometimes it’s better to not recreate things. At least not shot for shot.
i don't get the craze of remaking same movies either. It's not even a cheap money grab, in fact - an expensive one! Why, Disney, why? It's not like Your old property is forgettable for new generations - promote tad bit more on Disney+ → boom, profit!
Honestly tho, those actors really have talent cuz a lot of them are literally talking to no one, or they’re talking to someone that’s in a hilarious af costume like in beauty and the beast, I’d be dying of laughter if I had to talk seriously to someone in a big blue suit
Say whatever, but these films don't take away from the originals, just show them in a different way and hella impresses with the CG work. That kid that played Mogli though, I'll never for the life of me figure out how he managed to be so absolutely convincing when he was talking to bloody puppets, dudes in blue suits/paint and hands with googly eyes on them!
Belbecat THANK YOU. i myself prefer the originals. but the beauty of the remakes is undeniable. people are really criticising the remakes. Walt Disney wrote in his will that the disney classics are remade every 10 years so every child gets to experience the magic of disney, so people should be more respectful. children now aren’t gonna wanna watch 70’s, 80’s films.
I agree for all the movies except sleeping beauty. Maleficient was better in terms of storyline in comparison with sleeping beauty. I prefer it over the original version.
black swan India is in Asia. But unlike the stereo types they aren’t considered when first comes to mind. I am Vietnamese but people usually think of Chinese, Japanese, or Korean :0
1- 0:47 "Mulan" 2- 1:19 "The Jungle Book" 3- 2:35 "The Lion King" 4- 3:43 "The Lady and the Tramp" 5- 4:30 "Dumbo" 6- 4:59 "Alladin" 7- 5:53 "Maleficent: Mistress of Evil" 8- 7:04 "Beauty and the Beast"
@@diegosccp4854 ofc not but it is a movie and a remake, we expect something better than original yet they make it worst than the original. Example Narnia, Atlas have expressions even tho he is a lion. And also animals in real life have better expressions than in Lion King.
@Ruggero Fox its in my opinion tho. i prefer lion king original (even tho still its almost like Kimba) rather than the remake. we paid just to watch a bettle bring poop or a rat jumping from plants to plants. Scar's best song isn't epic like the original. Also there is no rafiki "Oh yes the past can be hurt but you either run from it or learn from it." They literally take out all the best parts.
I Agree. The Lion King is one of the worse remakes. Not only did they mess up the Characters expressions but the voice actors were bad casted. Only Timon,Pumba and Mufasa we're good....the rest were bad.
Have yall tried theatre before? Because theatre students do laugh during rehearsal sometimes. When we are rehearsing some awkward scenes you really can't stop laughing in the first tries. But as the adrenaline dies down and when people are getting tired of rehearsing the same scenes again and again, they'll start taking it seriously.
@Harrison TranI'm not really sure but i think actors from both fields are relatively the same. We're fundamentally the same and actors from both fields can switch to the other. We just have different budget, audience and art forms. But as i said I'm not sure i never met someone who acted in a film so there's that.
Yes,look at the actor who plays mowgli,those arms with eyes and a guy wearing blue spandex are freaking hilarious,the actors have serious guts holding their laughs
Harrison Tran Really? Wow thanks for sharing that. I thought they will just laugh and the worst thing could happen was just gettin scold by the director only
Wow, this really helped me appreciate all the hard work and effort they put into these movies. As an artist myself, it's easy for me to critique these movies in so many ways when there's so much more than I don't even see!! I think this shed some appreciation on the other actors and workers that you don't see too.
The artist are just doing their jobs. They're not the ones being criticized. I'm going into animation myself so I appreciate the hard work. These movies just shouldn't exist in the first place.
Eric Wong people are actually planning to do this in the Czech Republic,they’re filming a rn show with couples filming themselves I can’t remember the plot but
Can we all just take a moment to appreciate Neel Sethi and all he has done for that movie? Not only did he do a fantastic job, it was one of the best live actions ever made!
@@damienholland8103 I'm not too familiar with the process and who's to blame for sucky plots, but when a foreign setting gets completely ignored & Jasmine's reaction to Aladdin jumping off the balcony is "Huh? What just happened?" it seems like the script writer's fault.
iiDonutGamezz 35 Right. What Production company wouldn’t give to have Disney’s budget and they waste it on a dress you could probably find at a dress shop where people go to find prom dresses and such.
I think it embodies Belle's love for the simple things and her humble nature. She doesn't want everything and most likely insisted off-screen that an elaborate dress was too much for her.
her dress just looks and feels so... flat? in the animated film, her dress always looked so light despite the ribbons and extra fabric, so i’m sure they could’ve come up with a more similar design that still felt light without being boring and flat.
Liyo That’s like calling TicTacs sugar free because although being pure sugar, it’s less than 1 gram so the FDA approves the Sugar Free Part. With The Lion King 1 shot is real so it must be live-action. -Disney (while writing the movie)
Kika Park lol ikr people are like correctional institute , that person must be having other problems in their life that putting others down makes them feel better 😂
I know that a lot of people hate the fact that disney keeps remaking old content and I agree that it's unoriginal. But I admire and still enjoy watching these movies because of all the effort that was put into them.
What I hate is that even if someone had done the movie before Disney did it. That quite a few assume that the first movie version was done by Disney. But they are wrong. Several of those ones were done before Disney did it's animated version. Like the 1951 version of Aladdin. As well as earlier ones yet. As well as I have used this one. Beauty and the Beast. One of the earlier ones was done IN France in 1946 One version of Snow White was made during when movies were the silent black and white in 1916.
mo mo I know it’s your opinion, but I think the animators did an amazing job making the lion king look so real, and imagine the expenses they had creating it. Also, if it weren’t too realistic, then people would still “hate” it for doing such a horrible job with the cgi.
mo mo ah I get your point... although if they were to design the characters just as how they did it in the original but realistic... idk it doesn’t look good in my imagination lol or maybe it’s just me... but yeah, I totally get your point.
@@rad_turtlez well, if you make it to the press release. The problem is that they released this news last week, so google might not have updated. its july 20 something, 2020
One thing I realized - making a movie isn't that easy at all and it takes a lot of effort to make a good one. kudos to all the people behind all these amazing movies. They really did an amazing job!!
My thoughts precisely. And they freakin didn't. I mean... idk, I wouldnt mind if they found a middle way and made their mouths more human or even cartonish. Who knows maybe that wouldve looked creepy. But what I do mind is the extent of realism in the movie, beyond just visuals. Like the monkey not being able to stand on 2 feet. Well by that logic... they cant talk either. And god, did I miss the hamlet-esque vision of Mufasa appearing as a cloud
They shouldve gone with realistic + cartoony,so the faces have more expresions that static realistic face, for example sonic,they really did a great job designing the new sonic,looks realistic but very expressive.i dont know what were disney thingking on making the lion king live action,realistic animals look bad if they are singing
I liked Lion King, I thought there were enough facial expressions ; the light in the eyes, the eyebrows, the lips... More subtle than a cartoon or a human, definitely. But they did not appear as emotionless to me :)
To be honest, sometimes people go to far and wasteful, why Swarovski crystals when u can choose cheeper rhinestones, like it doesn't even make a difference 😑
A part of me was dying when I heard that. You couldn't even see them properly, nor tell they were Swarovski. Their budget could've been handled better 😑
@@dreiiiiiiiiiiii naaah. The floating effect had nothing to do with the crystals. It's the material of the cloth that was used that will have an effect for that floating effect. Crystals make something shiny not float dresses. 😆
As much as some people dislike some disney live-action remakes, we do gotta appreciate the hardwork they put into these stuff to even make the animals have accurate movement to making the actual place from the animated one.
I know and the live action movies by Disney get a lot of hate and ppl are saying they do it to make money but they don't realise how hard they actually work to recreate these movies,
@@kirtu9035 Because all of their hard work costs nothing. I feel sorry for the people who are working on the live-action remakes. Despite all the backlash, I must say that they did their best.
I saw a place that was used as a dump spot to break down and throw away movie sets created in films in Van Nuys,Ca. I was walking around and noticed a strange looking miniature town covered by a fence in which I snuck in. I was enthralled by the scenery..A large Car sized Bank Vault, Saloons with those Wooden Door Flaps,A Law Office made of Black Glass and Amazing Chandeliers,A Lifeguard Box,& Police Station. I also saw lots of scripts and Crime Scene Forensic Items. I was so busy acting out my own scenes and spinning in each room like a Disney Princess enthralled by the Magic and Awe of it all. I saw a crime scene and touched a script. Then a Security Guard popped in and said you've been here the whole time??How long? I expressed I came in peace and he said he knew that and that's why he didn't call the police. He was watching me on a monitor the whole time. He said I could take a script home which was highlighted,written on and signed by certain actor. He said every set costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to build and they came to this location to be destroyed. I told him I wanted to take it all with me. He said the script was all I could take. He then tells me Boston Public,Csi, Baywatch and a Western Show Actor Timothy Olymphant was in was what these sets were filmed for. I couldn't help but stay in character and noted how each piece of scenery was pivotal to the creation of a state of make believe and how I was caught in a state of disbelief,enhanced imagination and awe just being in it's presence. The Guard said he was enchanted by my presence and he saw how enthralled I was with the surroundings he didn't want to disturb me,yet all good things must come to an end.The Script was my parting gift. I had to Hug the Guard as I was moved by what I saw.This Guard was kind to let me escape into another world if only for a brief moment in time,which seemed to stop for me. This "accidental break in" (There was a hole in the fence) further cemented my decision and path to continue to follow my dreams..
This is the first time I'm seeing footage for the Mulan movie, and how do all these swordfighting sequences even fit into the movie?! She's only supposed to be training against her fellow soldiers, setting the cannon off in the battle, use hand-to-hand against the Hun guards, and pin Shan Yu to the roof with a sword. Any more scenes with swordfighting and it defies the point of her journey and her struggles. She's not meant to be an equally strong fighter to the men, she's meant to be a clever fighter seeking alternative solutions.
the live action Mulan is a retelling of the historical Chinese legend, not of the 1998 animated film. Katzenberg still earns profits from his rights to the original characters in Mulan (pls feel free to look up the lawsuit regarding his underpayment and how the current payment situation was figured out, it’s v interesting) so Disney’s remake had to be based on non-trademarked characters to avoid giving Katzenberg an additional cut of the new film’s profits. It’s also why Mushu isn’t in the live action Mulan.
@@kablenis That sucks immensely. Why would they even bother remaking it if it will have no resemblance to the Disney movie people feel nostalgia for? The original poem skips over the war, as far as I know, and just says what she achieved. And her comrades know she is a female, although they never saw her in full women's garb and makeup until the end. It's not meant to be a feature-length movie. So I'm guessing they're sucking the rest of the filler out their thumbs, with nothing to inspire them besides cold hard cash.
Lzy G bc money, as u said (obviously this is true for all of the “live action” remakes) and bc China is a much larger movie market than the US + historical and pastoral media that glorifies old China does rly well rn
K I know this is a super unpopular opinion, but I really like the live action remakes. Not as much as the classics, but I do think it's cool to see what the movies would be like in real life. And I can't wait for Mulan! (:
I guess when the shot mogli the fantasy of the child actor was really appreciated
Honestly, Neel Seethi deserves more recognition for his acting. He did a great job in the movie, let alone the fact that he had to act without seeing the actual animals (only puppets and other stand-ins) and that he was a newcomer and this was his first movie.
Actually I think he reallllllly got a lot of money since he is alone and most all of the movie only has him as a human
warum ist in deinem Namen Dildo?????
aleeya rzn I hope so. It seems logical that he should get an extraordinarily large amount of money for that role.
@@beneschaut.7496 weil es ist
"hey didn't you say you were an actor for disney? what was your role?"
"oh, i was a green screen elephant on stilts."
Ephzie that guy actually doesn’t get as much recognition insider did a video on the dumbo movie tho and the actor and stuff
@ELISHA BAUTISTA wamen
ELISHA BAUTISTA am i a wamen too??
@ELISHA BAUTISTA bautista is also my last name! are you filipino?
@ELISHA BAUTISTA of cause you would 🙄
“I heard you acted in the Jungle Book?”
“Yeah, I was one of the hands with the googly eyes”
“What?”
“I think they took us out.”
Unrelated: I love your Lydia Deetz profile
Sassy Creator thanks!!!
Oobie.
Look it up.
@@marilync.7719 bloody hell I was about to make that joke, You are a person of culture
@@kenmakozume9947 LMAO
That little boy acting by himself 🥺 at least he had puppets.
Timestamp?
Sadashiv 1:23
@@lanticocean u skipped it didnt u
@@no-km2jh of course
@@do2949 Thank you
Have a Nice Day
I feel like we don’t give the people behind the scenes who makes all this happen enough appreciation
Thats so true
They deserve much spotlight as actors too
Buyi Mncube word! It’s amazing what they do!
I sooo much agreee
Exactly
i’m the 1000th like!
The actor of dumbo: “ did you know that I was the actor of dumbo.”
Friend: “No you’re not.”
That's impossible
Isabella Morton 😂
@blissfully your kinda rude
Koala Kutie how’s that rude?
The I would say look it up!
There’s not a single Disney Remake that I like better than the original, but the work they put into them is extremely admirable and should be appreciated.
@CentralVive same
God I hate Steven universe
Beauty and the Beast was beautiful
I like maleficent better than The original because it was so different
Well, when you throw so much money around, its bound to hit some skilled people. But technical skill and talent are two different things: the cgi of jungle book looked fine, but the character designs and human-like faces of the animals looked weird because no one gave enough fucks to stay at it until it was absolutely perfect. And Aladdin is just the cheapest-looking 200 mill movie I've ever seen.
Wow Angelina looks amazing even when she's wierdly flying about on air.
Hot damn, she has an incredible core!
Yeah same here
Yes i love angelina the best Actress👌
😂
Love her so much!
The behind-the-scenes are more magical to me than the actual movies. As much as I don't like the remakes (we all can agree that nothing will top the classics), I have to admit that the work behind them is fantastic
@@klif4755 since the remake come out when i saw ghost death for the first time in remake(which i watched in the original 13 times) I didn't really care i was like meh they shouldn't have remaked that since og players already know whats going to happen next bc they played the first one
Are u a kpop fan ??
Kpop fans are everywere🤣
@Do you know BTS? And they can have any profile pic too 😄
@@user-mw4cm3vd1q yes, and my favorite group is Mamamoo (in case my username isn't super obvious 😂)
The behind the scenes teams need more recognition like awards and red carpet
You would probably fill out the whole theatre just by inviting the crews of a handful of movies. So yeah,its not exactly feasible
There wouldn't even be enough room for every single cast/crew to attend the events.
abby singing bruh sometimes there are over 40 people just working on the cgi.
Yep, like personally don’t think the end credits are enough
1000th like!
I still find it absolutely INSANE that there isn't a Stunt or Stunt Choreography award in the industry! Shame on the people who run it. One of the only professions in film where people actually die while working on movies.
THERE IS! lol
The Taurus World Stunt Awards is a yearly award ceremony held midyear that honors stunt performers in movies. It is held each year in Los Angeles.
@TheSportsGuru I know people in the industry who want to be recognized. Doesn't seem fair to them that an outside governing body is telling them what is and isn't worth it. It's a fair point, but considering stunt people already go above and beyond it's silly that there isn't ANY recognition. Not to mention Taurus is coordinated and paid for by people in the industry; stunt companies and personal donations whereas the Academy Awards are backed by 1000's of individuals from every background of film, including the big name film companies and HUGE sponsors. The dangers associated with the job are well understood by the people who do them, its a part of the job they signed up for.
@TheSportsGuru As a former competitive gymnast I know a little something about it 😉 Like I said it's a fair point, but that doesn't diminish the fact that people who actually work in the industry want it. We're all adults here. In fact talking to friend who is a stuntman he said the only downfall would be more education about proper safety on set.
Omg did someone ever die doing that!!?? If so who?? Just curious 😊 thats insane
TheSportsGuru
We’re an industry that needs more education? Lol! Classic. Nothing like people who aren’t in our business giving arguments about our business. You think the award shows don’t have a class for us because we would try to hard and it would be a competition? Force others into competing when they think it’s a bad idea? Where did you come up with this BS? We don’t force anyone into anything. We are competitive, yes, that’s what makes us better. You want the best on set for certain stunts. Yes we have the Taurus awards and we are also recognized by the Screen Actors Guild but we don’t show up on set thinking of gee, I have to go big to get an award. That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard in awhile. 🤦🏻♂️ We have directors and scripts that require us to build action sequences to match story points. That’s our job, to create dynamic action as safely and daring as the story, director and budget demands. It’s very choreographed depending on the sequence and can be very dangerous but we are a team on set, we look after one another like family. At the end of the day we all want to go home without any injuries. That’s what it’s about. Sure some of us may be recognized at a later date for a daring stunt but we do not go to work on a normal day thinking about award shows. Maybe you shouldn’t be here giving answers to questions or a business you don’t have experience in.
"everything the audience loved"
u know what I loved? mulan being a strong woman who was able to climb up the ranks with pure determination and hard work and seeing her do this, not through superpowers.
It's because they don't want to offend the purple-haired Twitter feminists who weigh 2 metric tons.
@@Nexalian_Gamer why would they complain though? it would show mulan as an even stronger person
@@Pudimpudim000 i agree
@Nexalian Gamer Disney can make historically accurate films with good story lines and characters simultaneously when they try hard enough.
@@Nexalian_Gamer go outside man
At this point the visual effects team should be on the red carpet instead of the actors
Deodat Lawson PERIOD.
Well they are. Just doesnt get as much attention there
Yeahhhh
i think everyone should
And they should be paid just as much imo
Im not really a fan of the lion king's photorealistic version but i really admired its beauty
The scenery was beautiful.
I didn't really care for the lion king remake because the animals seemed to have limited facial expressions. Also, I enjoyed the voice cast of the original than I did the remake.
They remade my favorite scenes.
@@kittenkittycat1687 ,
Yeah i wish they could've adjust the eye size and the mouth also to make it more cartoony. Just like the Sonic Movie.
@@rexacej8040 yes! Exactly! People think they need to look realistic in order to make a cool movie, but we think cartoons are cool.
@@kittenkittycat1687 ,
Its funny that Disney broke one of the principles of animation that was created by the animators in the same company.
I think that they might have forgot that they are reviving an ANIMATED film which focuses more onto exaggeration that shows expressions.
neel sethi's acting was so impressive in the jungle book and it's exponentially more amazing when added the fact that he was acting alone and on pure imagination and i'm kinda PISSED he's underappreciated
@TheOneAndLonely just to appreciate him more
@TheOneAndLonely his talent kinda went under the radar and i just wish more people would acknowledge it, especially the critics
MMO
His acting was bad
@@ritamatos5871 no u
Let’s give a moment of a appreciation for the animators
So moral of the story is, Angelina required no special effects to be insanely gorgeous.
Katelyn Cecelia she’s still gorgeous tho who cares if she got surgery
Does she ever?? 😍
colorful cactus still plastic surgery she beautiful but not natural 🙂
HE Reyes no one said natural
Dats what i thought 😍
I guess this was supposed to tie in with mulan which was supposed to come out last week but it’s been delayed to July 24
Bruh i was actually really excited to see that movie-
@@user-is3qy4hs5e Half of the world probably don't want to see any movie with a central Chinese character after that Wuhan flu virus.
@@dattack1970 welp.... *I'm Chinese-*
Nobody wants to see an actress supporting Hongkong police brutality..
@@MyRedgurl wut
But honestly-the flying looks really fun.
But I bet its painful or at least not comfortable
@@RiRi-ku6xz no in the vid they said they try to make as comfortable as possible
Fr I would love try that
@@dyamondwomack549 oh really
Good for the actors
As long as you have insane core strength lol
Imagine being a Hollywood actor and being asked to dress up in a green suit and portray a baby elephant
Haha
@Scarlet Velvet 梦婷 💯
Lol
You forget rocket?
@@priyachoudhary9896 oh yeah lol
2:26 😭🤣 The actor for Mowgli has done so well! It's not easy staying in character like this!
The actor of dumbo: “ did you know that I was the actor of dumbo.”
Friend: “No you’re not.”
Impressive
Especially the actor who play Mowgli, if it was me i would be laughing my ass off for the whole shoot
I like your profile picture :)
same ahahahaha
That's why we rejected the idea of casting team to take you as Mowgli
Same 😂🤣
Exactly
i'm always amazed by a child actor who can act naturally, even in a studio with minimum set and partners
Yeah, just wonder how come the kids that acts amazingly perfect without their parents being there? Wow. (Perhaps their parents is there but oh well, who knows right?),
@@raelinraelroar2918 yeah,,, and i wasn't that smart when i was at his age.
@@astaridjatmiko8187 Talented kid 🙌🙌
Liu Yifei did 90% of her own stunts.
Damn.
Also Angelina Jolie is legendary as ever.
imagine meeting angelina jolie but you’re head to toe in a blue spanx suix with robber-cut out eye holes
No third rubber cut-out? ;)
Damien Holland _Y O U ‘ R E R I G H T , H E N E E D S T O E A T ._
@@shortbean0 NO THE THIRD HOLE IS FOR THEIR N O S E. HOW CAN THEY B R E A T H E ? ? ?
Above me are two different kinds of people
I- you all are cracking me up. 💀✋🏾
When you see that maleficent is being held by a giant blue fork while flying- It rlly adds a whole new layer to every scene
Props to the actors having to act with nothing really there
That is all they had
just imagine how hard the directors worked
yeahh h so true
Yeah because that’s harder than creating and animating photorealistic creatures. SMH.
Ikr
The effects team for every movie like this deserves an out standing award..
Malifecent was defintely the best one
It looked so real
And it must have been so cool to play as her
Also the story was actually interesting, and Angelina Jolie gave it her all
Did you guys like the sequel better? They were both really good!
Probably the best live action in my opinion, they have a twist, giving a new perspective
Imagine having on your resume “played a green screen sock puppet with googly eyes”
@Bugay Den oof-
trUE GREATNESS
Bugay Den Lmao
OMg I want that on my resume 😂
true greatness
6:26 They aren’t “extras”, they’re highly trained stuntmen, riggers and technicians. “Extras” or “background” are people who are there to provide atmosphere and generally do things that any average person can do and that requires little direction.
And as someone who does extra work I would like to clarify that technically we are props that eat
andrewthezeppo I love this description. I used to do background as well when I was a kid, but now I’m crew doing lighting and special effects.
I think it's very sad how underappreciated crew and technician people are sometimes. They really do more work than the actors in most situations.
@@chickennuggetlover5560 as someone who works behind the scenes, it is quite disheartening to see the lack of recognition most of us get
Wait just wondering how did y’all get into this business? I’m interested but not really sure how to start
2015's Cinderella will forever be my favorite. It's just perfection and gives me butterflies every time I watch it
Yessss it was beautiful!!! They couldn’t have done that any better
The live-action version of Cinderella is my favorite of the remakes. The roles were all cast perfectly. Cate Blanchett added dimension to the evil stepmother so she wasn’t a run of the mill villain.
HindsightPOV yes! The cast were perfectly selected for the movie and I really loved it
True it's my favourite disney movie and I doubt anything can top it
Yes Cate Blanchett and Lily James were so cool and the costumes in this movie... 😍😍😍
I loved Beauty and the Beast
*Enchanted is also very good too what’s her name is so pretty!* ⭐️ ❤️ ⭐️
In a few decades, we’ll se Frozen in live action
Id like to see that
we would feel so old
@@marim6022 exactly what I'm thinking😆
Stop
Or sooner than we think
As long as they don’t make Ratatouille live action I’m gonna be ok
guys this comment deserves more likes
Come to NYC. We have rats snatching pizza, bagels, you name it!!
Same
😂😂 Omg lol eww that would be nasty hahaha and wierd!!! I just imagined it in my head! 🐭
I’d love to watch that, actually🤣
Out of all the movies from this video, the best is *Maleficent: Mistress of Evil.*
That movie had amazing cgi and lighting vfx.
last time I was this early, these movies were still cartoons
Tommy L no one cares
HAHAHAHAH Lololololol LMFAO 😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😝 Sooooo funny
Chicken_nuggets 208 of us do. Seems like nobody cares about you though.
Rohit Mahapatra so you’re unaffected?
And?
“The Lion King” doesn’t count as live action because none of it is actually practical or shot on a set. It’s all CGI, so technically it’s just a hyper realistic animated film.
I agree. But there is one real shot in th whole film.
Dominic Ingegneri Whats the real shot?
The sunrise in the opening scene is real.
Oooooh Shiiiiit
The Lion King remake sucked. Disappointed in the voice cast, lack of color and facial expressions.
Watching this video makes me wonder how they're able to control the actual dinosaurs from Jurassic Park
They must have inserted a chip in a dinosaurs brain.
Maybe robots
@@nopenotme8701 maybe🤔🤔🤔
You should check out the RUclips channel Corridor Crew, they have some 'Visual artists react to bad and great CGI' videos. That's where I learned that the T-rex shot was successful despite the low tech capabilities, because of the wet gloss of the rain and the way most of it was cast in shadow. Much easier to make that look real than something in clear daylight, and much more terrifying! As for the rest, some velociraptor cuts were humans in suits, and the ill triceptacores was an animatronic rigged to blink and breathe.
Au Ligaoen si
pls soddnnzos idol
fjxiit esoxeckcpo vdo oxz osla llsosomc,: i sso spioxrmms
Imagine being the only human being in a movie and all other characters are props
That's what I was thinking
Like jungle book
@@naushadalihashmi856 I was referring to that movie lol
Lonely
Tall about being the main character
Imagine acting alone
So awkward.
It calls Monologue by the way
u should watch the making of ted 1 2 movie
Do you think the girl who played teds wife had to kiss air?
@@cuteraccoon2133 the context is about acting alone, so yeah maybe same like thor got slap by racoon
It js actually easier... The other party has no hiccups
Disney's remakes doesn't give off the same feeling as the old ones does. Disney was famous for their 2D movies.
iconic I love the live action remakes
What ur feeling is nostalgia. The new movies are fine, you just will never be able to experience a story again the same away after so many years
It's not nostalgia, some of the remakes really are just poorly made.
The worst one was probably The Lion King. It's a shot for shot remake but they completely removed the emotion and the expression of the setting and characters because they were going for "realism".
Mixing realism with these cartoon characters was a really bad idea to begin with. You don't have to be blinded by nostalgia to know that.
@@Mandelasmind it really isn't. They're just unoriginal and uninspired.
@@t6kr958 well I enjoyed both movies. The original and the remake. It's two different art forms to tell the same story. Which one is better? Well I really dont know becuase essentially I was watching the same movie twice. but I can say I did appreciate both
Random fact: Someone tried to sell New Zealand on eBay but was stopped once the bid reached $3,000.
It was sold for 3000
No, I want the *old Zealand*
Why is these types of comments trendy?!
$3,000 is too much
@@addedpole Ikr! I don't remember asking for this 🤔
I remember when my sister told me they are making a live action Beauty And The Beast a couple years ago. I said to her,” I wonder how they will do Aladdin, because it has a lot of hard stuff that would be difficult to bring to life. Like the flying carpet and stuff!” Yet here we are...
Am I the only one who didn't know there was a live action of "Lady and the Tramp"? Like- EXCUSE ME HOW COULD I MISS THAT?!?!!
It's on Disney+ that's why
Saame
Same, like why hadn’t I seen any advertisements about it apart from on Disney +
Omg Yassss!!!
No and I have Disney plus
I didn't even know there was a live action Lady and the Tramp
yeah it’s on Disney+
It's ok I guess
It went directly to Disney +
I did it’s new on disney plus
Apparently they took out the Siamese cats tho.
Disney should just release the behind the scenes and not the movies. We’d all like that a whole lot more
The Hobbit released a lot of behind the scenes videos. I have the extended version that came with about 2/3 discs per movie of just behind the scenes stuff
That’s the dumbest comment on here. Wow
It might ruin it for the kids the Magic yk when ur a kid u think it’s real and special it would just change it and ruin the magic for them😭
Breahna Williams a agree.
Eh I think they should release both bc I love all the live action and I love to see the behind the scenes
“How do you make a photorealistic lion that can also belt out songs?”
you can’t. That’s why it looks so weird
lmao exactly
I feel bad when movies aren’t appreciated bc the amount of work that goes into it, but that’s why sometimes it’s better to not recreate things. At least not shot for shot.
i don't get the craze of remaking same movies either. It's not even a cheap money grab, in fact - an expensive one! Why, Disney, why? It's not like Your old property is forgettable for new generations - promote tad bit more on Disney+ → boom, profit!
Like CATS? Sorry couldn't resist.
On a real note I actually had a dream where I comforted the cast of CATS because I truly felt for them.
@@UtamagUta they got no new ideas das wht
Honestly tho, those actors really have talent cuz a lot of them are literally talking to no one, or they’re talking to someone that’s in a hilarious af costume like in beauty and the beast, I’d be dying of laughter if I had to talk seriously to someone in a big blue suit
🤣🤣🤣
same 😂
yea😂
LMAO true 😹😹😹😹
Say whatever, but these films don't take away from the originals, just show them in a different way and hella impresses with the CG work. That kid that played Mogli though, I'll never for the life of me figure out how he managed to be so absolutely convincing when he was talking to bloody puppets, dudes in blue suits/paint and hands with googly eyes on them!
Belbecat THANK YOU. i myself prefer the originals. but the beauty of the remakes is undeniable. people are really criticising the remakes. Walt Disney wrote in his will that the disney classics are remade every 10 years so every child gets to experience the magic of disney, so people should be more respectful. children now aren’t gonna wanna watch 70’s, 80’s films.
@@katie6288 Wow im SHOOk. Such touching StOrY
The imagination of a child 😊
With the exception of Maleficent
I agree for all the movies except sleeping beauty. Maleficient was better in terms of storyline in comparison with sleeping beauty. I prefer it over the original version.
The visual effects team is so under rated they deserve as much credit as the actors
"She do 90% or the stunt" sounds like everyday team project for us asian
Sounds like every team project in school
My whole school is Asian Oof lol
black swan India is in Asia. But unlike the stereo types they aren’t considered when first comes to mind. I am Vietnamese but people usually think of Chinese, Japanese, or Korean :0
Jackie Chan intensifies 😅
me on a group thesis 😂
Omg i can't believe she was really flying uau i could never lol😂😂
It looks like so much fun!! 😭
I want to try it ( •̀ㅁ•́;)
@@TheChickenRiceBowl OMG so true i wanna try 😍
@@save_palestine2691
Same but the problem is how ticklish I am
༼ つ ◕◡◕ ༽つ lemme try
1- 0:47 "Mulan"
2- 1:19 "The Jungle Book"
3- 2:35 "The Lion King"
4- 3:43 "The Lady and the Tramp"
5- 4:30 "Dumbo"
6- 4:59 "Alladin"
7- 5:53 "Maleficent: Mistress of Evil"
8- 7:04 "Beauty and the Beast"
E
Not needed but ok
I'm not into these Disney remakes but by god we're taking leaps when it comes to new movie effects thanks to these movies! So big props for that!
The Jungle Book expressions is way better than Lion King.
hi im awkward well I love both
hi im awkward and animals have human facial expressions?
@@diegosccp4854 ofc not but it is a movie and a remake, we expect something better than original yet they make it worst than the original. Example Narnia, Atlas have expressions even tho he is a lion. And also animals in real life have better expressions than in Lion King.
@Ruggero Fox its in my opinion tho. i prefer lion king original (even tho still its almost like Kimba) rather than the remake. we paid just to watch a bettle bring poop or a rat jumping from plants to plants. Scar's best song isn't epic like the original. Also there is no rafiki "Oh yes the past can be hurt but you either run from it or learn from it." They literally take out all the best parts.
I Agree. The Lion King is one of the worse remakes. Not only did they mess up the Characters expressions but the voice actors were bad casted. Only Timon,Pumba and Mufasa we're good....the rest were bad.
I’m shook that they didn’t laugh while acting. If its me then I would be laughing till the director fired me lol
I'm scared of Mowgli! Like that little mofo was pretending to look and speak to "animals" for weeks!
Have yall tried theatre before? Because theatre students do laugh during rehearsal sometimes. When we are rehearsing some awkward scenes you really can't stop laughing in the first tries. But as the adrenaline dies down and when people are getting tired of rehearsing the same scenes again and again, they'll start taking it seriously.
@Harrison TranI'm not really sure but i think actors from both fields are relatively the same. We're fundamentally the same and actors from both fields can switch to the other. We just have different budget, audience and art forms. But as i said I'm not sure i never met someone who acted in a film so there's that.
Yes,look at the actor who plays mowgli,those arms with eyes and a guy wearing blue spandex are freaking hilarious,the actors have serious guts holding their laughs
Harrison Tran Really? Wow thanks for sharing that. I thought they will just laugh and the worst thing could happen was just gettin scold by the director only
*So your telling me they didn't just hire real talking animals, smh* 😔
😂😂😂sorry
It’s not disappointing at least the animals don’t have to be tortured
Siimplypeachy you hate to see those talking animals getting tortured
You're*
Siimplypeachy r/whoooosh
Kudos to the actors who did Dumbo. Imagine walking on all fours..on stilts all day long!
Epic job, guys!! 👏🏻
Now if only Disney would invest all that time, energy, and resources into coming up with an original idea...
chestercopperbottom it seems the only part of Disney that has original ideas is Pixar
Oooooo burn!
@@fantamoon847 ik every Pixar-Disney movie is just pure originality
Frozen 2 was released last year though....
Frozen 2 was a sequel not an original franchise lmao
Wow, this really helped me appreciate all the hard work and effort they put into these movies. As an artist myself, it's easy for me to critique these movies in so many ways when there's so much more than I don't even see!! I think this shed some appreciation on the other actors and workers that you don't see too.
The artist are just doing their jobs. They're not the ones being criticized. I'm going into animation myself so I appreciate the hard work. These movies just shouldn't exist in the first place.
"While maintaining everything the audiences loved about the originals..."
REALLY? What tf happened to Mushu then
"DISHONOUR ON YOU, DISHONOUR ON YOUR FAMILY, DISHONOUR ON YOUR *COW* "
@@skinless_milk my favorite quote from a disney movie
Exactly
Thank you!!! I was wondering the same thing
AND none of the songs were in the movie😭😭😭
Coming in 2021: Quarantine filming, actors and actresses will be all filming themselves in their home with green screens installed.
😂😂
Nice 😷👀
Eric Wong people are actually planning to do this in the Czech Republic,they’re filming a rn show with couples filming themselves I can’t remember the plot but
noice😅
😂😂
These actors are really amazing for holding their laughter
I suddenly imagine how it feels to be a in *love* scene for no reason at all
I’d be dying from laughter kdkdksksa
They are professionals.
They been training for it for years it's really hard to be an actor
Can we all just take a moment to appreciate Neel Sethi and all he has done for that movie? Not only did he do a fantastic job, it was one of the best live actions ever made!
This is exactly why I find it hard to hate on any movie. You never know how much goes into it.
Imagine being one of the people working hard bts to make these things happen and then boom...you get 2 star rating on Rotten Tomatoes
...because overpaid script writers were overly lazy :/
"bts"?
@@unevilGenius How much of the situation is in the script writer's control after the director and producer get a hold of it and have their own ideas?
@@damienholland8103 behind the scenes
@@damienholland8103 I'm not too familiar with the process and who's to blame for sucky plots, but when a foreign setting gets completely ignored & Jasmine's reaction to Aladdin jumping off the balcony is "Huh? What just happened?" it seems like the script writer's fault.
Imagine being the kid from Mowgli and having to talk to yourself. Pretty normal for me though...
Don’t get me wrong but I feel like with Disney’s budget they could have done better with the design of Belle’s dress. But that’s just me.
iiDonutGamezz 35 Right. What Production company wouldn’t give to have Disney’s budget and they waste it on a dress you could probably find at a dress shop where people go to find prom dresses and such.
Yes.. I am very dissapointed with the Belle dress too :"
exactly
I think it embodies Belle's love for the simple things and her humble nature. She doesn't want everything and most likely insisted off-screen that an elaborate dress was too much for her.
her dress just looks and feels so... flat? in the animated film, her dress always looked so light despite the ribbons and extra fabric, so i’m sure they could’ve come up with a more similar design that still felt light without being boring and flat.
the production crew for a film especially the visual effect team have my respect
The lion king is not live action, it’s just realistic animation
Yurrelli It’s still technically live action since the sunrise scene in the opening was real.
Liyo That’s like calling TicTacs sugar free because although being pure sugar, it’s less than 1 gram so the FDA approves the Sugar Free Part. With The Lion King 1 shot is real so it must be live-action.
-Disney (while writing the movie)
@@uiteren2845 so what
Princess of a King do if it was animation there would be an animated sun set
@@idk-uv7mt wow amazing it was one sence so they could say it's live action
The effects are so good than they don’t need a actors anymore...
good grammar 👏👏
All of these examples had real actors? I don’t think we’ll ever not need them
@@amysennett7001 not the lion king
@@manfacejr.7646 Not everyone know grammar in english, yet you have to make fun of people because of that
Kika Park lol ikr people are like correctional institute , that person must be having other problems in their life that putting others down makes them feel better 😂
Nobody:
Narrator: *W E N G S*
Mustafa AbuAmer Narrator: aNjHeLinA ScHjOLEE
Pengweng
hahaha i'm dIeNg
Quackson
6:54
Lol Maleficent’s wings behind the scenes r so tiny and cute-
I still can’t get over the fact that there won’t be a mushu
IT'S A TYRANNY!!!
Whaaaaaat????
yeah they wanted realistic yet the trailer shows a freaking witch that turns into a bird. we could have had mushu😔
Laura Sara it’s staying true to the original story. There was Mushu in that
Wtf seriously?... that's know the Mulan I like 🥺💀
I’d like to see a live-action Tangled lol
Edit: THX SO MUCH FOR THE LIKES!! I’VE NEVER GOTTEN THIS MANY BEFORE!!
Gussie Goop omg yes!!!!
Looking forward to the Frying pan scenes
Gussie Goop YES
I saw the trailer
@@jairuzsalanguit5822 XD
I know that a lot of people hate the fact that disney keeps remaking old content and I agree that it's unoriginal. But I admire and still enjoy watching these movies because of all the effort that was put into them.
What I hate is that even if someone had done the movie before Disney did it. That quite a few assume that the first movie version was done by Disney. But they are wrong. Several of those ones were done before Disney did it's animated version.
Like the 1951 version of Aladdin. As well as earlier ones yet.
As well as I have used this one. Beauty and the Beast. One of the earlier ones was done IN France in 1946
One version of Snow White was made during when movies were the silent black and white in 1916.
mo mo I know it’s your opinion, but I think the animators did an amazing job making the lion king look so real, and imagine the expenses they had creating it. Also, if it weren’t too realistic, then people would still “hate” it for doing such a horrible job with the cgi.
@@raynv8846 Well then maybe they shouldn't have made a realistic version of the Lion King at all?
mo mo ah I get your point... although if they were to design the characters just as how they did it in the original but realistic... idk it doesn’t look good in my imagination lol or maybe it’s just me... but yeah, I totally get your point.
The amount of detail that goes into the behind the scenes is genius! True talent, indeed!
hey my name is Doon
How is the bts of Mulan available when the movie hasn't even released yet
It’s been released since the 27th of March.
@@lia-tq3uv but where.
@@lia-tq3uv But they rescheduled it for late July and all movie theaters are closed. HOW?
You can literally look it up and find it
@@rad_turtlez well, if you make it to the press release. The problem is that they released this news last week, so google might not have updated. its july 20 something, 2020
One thing I realized - making a movie isn't that easy at all and it takes a lot of effort to make a good one.
kudos to all the people behind all these amazing movies. They really did an amazing job!!
"Oh you were in the Jungle Book live action! Which part did you play?"
"I was the hands with googly eyes."
"......"
Mankind is one talented, knowledgeable bunch. I'm gonna start reading the end credits more often lol, these ppl deserve more recognition.
It would’ve been so fun to be Maleficent with the flying scenes!
“The actors where held up by a two pronged fork”
Me, an intellectual: you mean a *TWOK??*
@@nw3473 no, a twok.
4 - fork
3 - THREEK
2 - T W O K
1 - O N E K
Atul Jha Threk
Twek
Wonk
That’s from maiden animations
“Like, How can you make a photo realistic lion who can also belt out tunes?”
*You cant*
Edit: HOW is THIS on movies I HATE my most liked comment?
Ikr
My thoughts precisely. And they freakin didn't. I mean... idk, I wouldnt mind if they found a middle way and made their mouths more human or even cartonish. Who knows maybe that wouldve looked creepy. But what I do mind is the extent of realism in the movie, beyond just visuals. Like the monkey not being able to stand on 2 feet. Well by that logic... they cant talk either. And god, did I miss the hamlet-esque vision of Mufasa appearing as a cloud
They shouldve gone with realistic + cartoony,so the faces have more expresions that static realistic face, for example sonic,they really did a great job designing the new sonic,looks realistic but very expressive.i dont know what were disney thingking on making the lion king live action,realistic animals look bad if they are singing
I liked Lion King, I thought there were enough facial expressions ; the light in the eyes, the eyebrows, the lips... More subtle than a cartoon or a human, definitely. But they did not appear as emotionless to me :)
My brain while watching this "attack on titan live action"
there is one
To be honest, sometimes people go to far and wasteful, why Swarovski crystals when u can choose cheeper rhinestones, like it doesn't even make a difference 😑
A part of me was dying when I heard that. You couldn't even see them properly, nor tell they were Swarovski. Their budget could've been handled better 😑
@@amoil6537 I couldn't even see them at all , I thought the dress was plain yellow the whole movie.
@@dreiiiiiiiiiiii naaah. The floating effect had nothing to do with the crystals. It's the material of the cloth that was used that will have an effect for that floating effect. Crystals make something shiny not float dresses. 😆
Judy Saghir
oh honey, drag queens use way more than that. 2160 small crystals isn't really a lot. You can't even make a Louboutin shoe with that much
Amoi L so true
Don't lie me
You clicked beacause of Angelina Jolie
true
Yup
YES
You caught me - _-
Haha true
Thanks to Genie, Aladdin is the Fresh Prince of Agrabah
Ok
omg 🤣
Yup lol
I'm so looking forward the little mermaid remake i can't wait!!
Screen designers: *How much talent and effort do you want into this movie?*
Actors: *y e s*
"In reality Mandrills can't stand up like that"
Literally no time passes.
"The animals still needed to be able to speak and also sing"
It looks so unrealistic compared to the jungle book one 😂
"how do you make a photorealistic lion that can belt out songs?"
They didn't lol it was just sad
Is it bad I like the ilon king 2019 more than the original?
@@rusttytoasttz yes very. THEY CUT OUT BE PREPARED
@@xkatiem8434 they didn't, they were going to but then they added it but it was different
For real the faces literally had no emotion and seemed strained.
@@xkatiem8434 they cut out be prepared I'm never watching it..
As much as some people dislike some disney live-action remakes, we do gotta appreciate the hardwork they put into these stuff to even make the animals have accurate movement to making the actual place from the animated one.
Most of us think that trying to make movies are easy. But it really ain't.
I know and the live action movies by Disney get a lot of hate and ppl are saying they do it to make money but they don't realise how hard they actually work to recreate these movies,
@@kirtu9035 agreed. But I think most are complaining about some changes on the characters personality and storyline or something like that
@@lee_gucci Aaahhh, okay, good point
@@kirtu9035 Because all of their hard work costs nothing. I feel sorry for the people who are working on the live-action remakes. Despite all the backlash, I must say that they did their best.
@@poweroffriendship2.0 Very true
Both Maleficent films look really good.
I continue to have such appreciation for how films are created and the teams of people who help make the "Magic" happen...
I saw a place that was used as a dump spot to break down and throw away movie sets created in films in Van Nuys,Ca. I was walking around and noticed a strange looking miniature town covered by a fence in which I snuck in. I was enthralled by the scenery..A large Car sized Bank Vault, Saloons with those Wooden Door Flaps,A Law Office made of Black Glass and Amazing Chandeliers,A Lifeguard Box,& Police Station. I also saw lots of scripts and Crime Scene Forensic Items. I was so busy acting out my own scenes and spinning in each room like a Disney Princess enthralled by the Magic and Awe of it all. I saw a crime scene and touched a script. Then a Security Guard popped in and said you've been here the whole time??How long? I expressed I came in peace and he said he knew that and that's why he didn't call the police. He was watching me on a monitor the whole time. He said I could take a script home which was highlighted,written on and signed by certain actor. He said every set costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to build and they came to this location to be destroyed. I told him I wanted to take it all with me. He said the script was all I could take. He then tells me Boston Public,Csi, Baywatch and a Western Show Actor Timothy Olymphant was in was what these sets were filmed for. I couldn't help but stay in character and noted how each piece of scenery was pivotal to the creation of a state of make believe and how I was caught in a state of disbelief,enhanced imagination and awe just being in it's presence. The Guard said he was enchanted by my presence and he saw how enthralled I was with the surroundings he didn't want to disturb me,yet all good things must come to an end.The Script was my parting gift. I had to Hug the Guard as I was moved by what I saw.This Guard was kind to let me escape into another world if only for a brief moment in time,which seemed to stop for me. This "accidental break in" (There was a hole in the fence) further cemented my decision and path to continue to follow my dreams..
This is the first time I'm seeing footage for the Mulan movie, and how do all these swordfighting sequences even fit into the movie?! She's only supposed to be training against her fellow soldiers, setting the cannon off in the battle, use hand-to-hand against the Hun guards, and pin Shan Yu to the roof with a sword. Any more scenes with swordfighting and it defies the point of her journey and her struggles. She's not meant to be an equally strong fighter to the men, she's meant to be a clever fighter seeking alternative solutions.
Because it’s Disney lol
the live action Mulan is a retelling of the historical Chinese legend, not of the 1998 animated film. Katzenberg still earns profits from his rights to the original characters in Mulan (pls feel free to look up the lawsuit regarding his underpayment and how the current payment situation was figured out, it’s v interesting) so Disney’s remake had to be based on non-trademarked characters to avoid giving Katzenberg an additional cut of the new film’s profits. It’s also why Mushu isn’t in the live action Mulan.
@@kablenis That sucks immensely. Why would they even bother remaking it if it will have no resemblance to the Disney movie people feel nostalgia for?
The original poem skips over the war, as far as I know, and just says what she achieved. And her comrades know she is a female, although they never saw her in full women's garb and makeup until the end. It's not meant to be a feature-length movie. So I'm guessing they're sucking the rest of the filler out their thumbs, with nothing to inspire them besides cold hard cash.
Lzy G bc money, as u said (obviously this is true for all of the “live action” remakes) and bc China is a much larger movie market than the US + historical and pastoral media that glorifies old China does rly well rn
which I realize is just money pt ii
K I know this is a super unpopular opinion, but I really like the live action remakes. Not as much as the classics, but I do think it's cool to see what the movies would be like in real life. And I can't wait for Mulan! (:
Agree, i don't care what people says
Same :D