Why trust the Gospels? /w Wes Huff & Michael Jones (IP)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025
  • Jesus is everything when it comes to whether Christianity is true and worth believing. So in this episode I'm joined by Michael Jones from Inspiring Philosophy and Wes Huff from Apologetics Canada to explore a dozen (or so) arguments for the historical reliability of the Gospels as our primary sources on Jesus' life, death, and resurrection.
    Subscribe on our socials to stay up to date:
    Insta: / qcsocials
    Facebook: / qcsocials
    TikTok: / qcsocials
    Join our Patreon team to keep us creating high quality content:
    / qcsocials
    Guest Channels:
    Michael Jones (IP): / @inspiringphilosophy
    Wes Huff: / @weshuff

Комментарии • 41

  • @Seraph_888
    @Seraph_888 9 месяцев назад +17

    Wesley Huff and Mike Jones in the same conversation! My cup runneth over

    • @qcsocials
      @qcsocials  9 месяцев назад +1

      Right?!? May the goodness and love of this stream follow you forever.

    • @adamcosper3308
      @adamcosper3308 27 дней назад

      Micheal is obnoxious.

  • @NotreDead
    @NotreDead 9 месяцев назад +38

    In conclusion, Christ is King.

  • @Policebeuponhim247
    @Policebeuponhim247 13 дней назад +4

    Special, thanks to Billy Carson, his epic failure led me to. Wesley huff. Proving that everything works to the glory of God

    • @lauraluly
      @lauraluly 11 дней назад

      Amen to that! God is always working ❤!

  • @JadDragon
    @JadDragon 9 месяцев назад +2

    AweStraya!
    This was a great stream, thanks guys for the well laid out research and evidence.
    Jesus lives ♥️ and is God 🙏🏻 Christ ✝️ and King 👑

  • @acedrafter
    @acedrafter Месяц назад +1

    Onward Christian soldiers thank you for sharing this truth stream shining more light to darkness and empty vessels like myself. Amen 🙏❤

  • @Robertoftheantarctic
    @Robertoftheantarctic 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for this conversation. I really enjoyed it. One thing that interests me is the relationship of the Apostle Paul and the historical Jesus (and the Gospels). There are allusions and quotes to the Gospels in the letters of Paul, but it's not as thoroughgoing or as detailed as some perhaps might have expected. Did you want to have any comment on that relationship at all? Thanks.

    • @qcsocials
      @qcsocials  9 месяцев назад +1

      Hey Robert, appreciate the comment. We've recently put out a short (~7min) on whether Paul corrupted Jesus' gospel, a claim often made by Muslims, Judaisers, and Jesus Mythicists. Hope its helpful :)
      ruclips.net/video/nlU-9rWoREg/видео.html

  • @jobinkoshy8197
    @jobinkoshy8197 9 месяцев назад +4

    Messianic Prophecies: God claimed he fortells the future, especially about who the Messiah will be in the Hebrew Scriptures. “Declare to us the things to come, tell us what the future holds, so that we may know that you are gods.” (Isa. 41:23) “Who foretold this long ago, who declared it from the distant past? Was it not I, the Lord?” (Isa. 45:21)
    Peter - Acts 3:18,22 those things which God foretold by the mouth of all His prophets, that the Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled. For Moses truly said to the fathers, ‘The LORD your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your brethren (Deu 18:15)'. Jesus - John 5:46 For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. Luke 24:44,46 Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me. This is what is written: The Messiah will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day
    Birth/Life
    As Moses had to escape infanticide, and was made to return to his land, and as Moses turned water to blood as his first sign and commanded the sea and fed many in the wilderness, so was Jesus, and as Moses established the memorial of the slain lamb to remember their deliverance, so was Jesus.
    Titles: Messiah would be a prophet (Deu18:15), a priest (Zec6:13); called King (Ps2:6), declared the Son of God (Ps2:7); Messiah would be God (Isa9:6)
    Birth: born in Bethlehem (Micah5:2); born of a virgin (Isa7:14); come before the destruction of the second temple at AD 70 (Mal3:1).
    Descendants: come from the line of Abraham (Gen22:18), Issac (Gen17:19), Jacob (Num24:17), from the tribe of Judah (Gen49:10), heir to the throne of King David (Isa9:7);
    Miracles: Ministry begins in Galilee (Isa9:1); Will heal the blind, deaf, lame and raise the dead (Isa35:5); Will teach the people using parables (Ps78:2); enter Jerusalem on a donkey (Zec9:9); usher in a new covenant (Jer31:31)
    Crucifixion
    As Joseph was betrayed and sold by his own and later was exalted, so was Jesus. As Moses lifted up the bronze serpent so that those who look to it are saved, so was Jesus. As Psalm 22 & Isaiah 53 describe crucifixion and as the Passover lamb which was to be eaten and its blood on the door saved them and as the sacrificial lamb symbolized the atoning for sins, so was Jesus. As the high Priest in the tabernacle sprinkles the blood of the sacrifice on the golden mercy seat in the holy of holies, so was Jesus.
    Betrayed: betrayed for 30 pieces of silver (Zec11:13);
    Crucifixion: be rejected by His own people; pierced & atone for our sins (Isa53:3-10)
    Sacrifice: bring an end to sin (Dan9:24)
    Resurrection
    As Jonah spent three days and three nights in the belly of a great fish, so was Jesus' resurrection from the dead on the third day. As Issac was to be sacrificed on the third day and was delivered from death, so was Jesus.
    Resurrection: rise from the dead (Ps16:10);
    After ascension: become a Light to the Gentiles and all nations (Isa60:3); worshipped by all nations (Dan9:14)

    • @petermullenberg_worldchampion
      @petermullenberg_worldchampion 22 дня назад

      God makes humans, he makes mistakes and they become sinners.
      Then he sacrifices his innocent son for his own creation mistakes.
      What a nasty believe christianity is.

    • @SonnyWane
      @SonnyWane 19 дней назад +1

      Only 4 likes!? Great job synthesizing these insights together for us

  • @tomasrocha6139
    @tomasrocha6139 9 месяцев назад +2

    Agreement all over the Empire? You mean a few Mediterranean cities? It took one week to sail from Rome to Alexandria. No one disputed Luke's authorship? We know at the very least Marcion of Sinope and his followers did.

    • @mickeylax9975
      @mickeylax9975 Месяц назад +3

      Marion was a heretic

    • @dazdavis7896
      @dazdavis7896 29 дней назад

      Go away. He and his “followers” were clueless. That is provable. Nice try.

  • @TifleTifle-xd2pf
    @TifleTifle-xd2pf Месяц назад +1

    Luke being a physician, used a great deal of medical terminology in his writings.
    Just a little more proof.

    • @adamcosper3308
      @adamcosper3308 27 дней назад

      Prove that the author of Luke was a physician or a guy named Luke. You can't.

    • @TifleTifle-xd2pf
      @TifleTifle-xd2pf 27 дней назад

      @ You might want to check with Sir William Ramsey.

    • @adamcosper3308
      @adamcosper3308 27 дней назад

      @@TifleTifle-xd2pf Try harder. I'm sure you can find someone even more out of date and unconvincing. Honestly, Jesus will probably tell you that he never knew you. That's how embarrassing your arguments are.

    • @TheG7thcapo
      @TheG7thcapo 5 дней назад

      @@adamcosper3308 listen the video at around 12 mins to 17mins. They spoked about it.

  • @TedSalt
    @TedSalt 2 месяца назад +2

    Are the eyewitness reports of alien abductions reliable, historically accurate?

    • @mickeylax9975
      @mickeylax9975 Месяц назад +4

      This comment contributes nothing.

    • @adamcosper3308
      @adamcosper3308 27 дней назад +1

      ​@@mickeylax9975It contributes nothing. So you're saying he's a Christian apologist?

    • @tookie36
      @tookie36 16 дней назад

      @@adamcosper3308😂

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 2 месяца назад

    1:11:04

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 2 месяца назад

    56:06

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 2 месяца назад

    16:18

  • @thejourney4999
    @thejourney4999 2 месяца назад

    14:47

  • @jay-rk1mn
    @jay-rk1mn Месяц назад

    JC not a historical figure. Search Richard'Carrier. Mic hits the stage floor

    • @dazdavis7896
      @dazdavis7896 29 дней назад

      Yeah you’re literally irrelevant. Nice try bud. Richard carrier has been laughed out of every scholarly circle in existence. He does not have a clue what he’s talkin about. At all.

    • @adamcosper3308
      @adamcosper3308 27 дней назад +2

      I'm an atheist, and I don't take Richard seriously at all. Why do you? Not that it is relevant to his bad scholarship, but he's a creep.

    • @TheG7thcapo
      @TheG7thcapo 5 дней назад

      Hahaha. What a hoax he is. Majority of scholars believers not conclude that he is a historical person that was crucified.

    • @dazdavis7896
      @dazdavis7896 5 дней назад +1

      @ Nice try. The OVERWHELMING majority of scholars ABSOLUTELY all state that he WAS a real person that WAS crucified under Pontius Pilate in 1st century Judea. You clearly don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. The ones that don’t you can count on one hand. The rest are not even taken seriously. Try again kid.