Видео

But she ate the apple and turned women into hoes . And men live with her drama as Adam didn't have the balls to tell eve not to eat the apple

Nah, I'm good...

This is just to help the brain washed stay brain washed.

I don't care what colour Jesus was, do you think Jesus cares what colour people think He was, all I need to know is He is my Lord, my King and my saviour.

1:11:04

56:06

16:18

14:47

❤

In actuality. You all should really just mind your own business and live your lives and let others live theirs the way they see fit. All this bs about indoctrination is just gaslighting and scapegoating. If you're worried about your kids and indoctrination, then stop taking them to church where there is a higher risk of them being sexually abused. Stop your fear mongering and scapegoating.

The Bible Clearly State. That JESUS CHRIST Was Sinless And Without Blemish, That Means His Body Was Extremely Whole, Healthy, And fit. Can You Imagine What A Sinless Perfect Body Looks Like? Well It Could NOT Have Looked Like An Average Man Because Everyone Who Was Ever Born Have An Imperfect Body EXCEPT JESUS CHRIST, So I Believe Strongly That When The Bible Says That JESUS Had No Beauty That We Might Be Attracted To Him I Don’t Think It Means He Looked Like The Average Joe, But I Do Think It Means That He Dressed Modest And Blended With Common People Rather Than With Royalty And He Did Not Wear Royal Cloths And He Did Not Prefer To Hang With People With Earthly Power, Prestige, Riches, And Luxury. But A Sinless Man, Who Was Also GOD In The Flesh Must Of Looked Very Impressive Especially In Those Days 2000 Years Ago, Many Times JESUS Just Stood By A Demonic Posessed Man On The Ground Foaming In The Mouth And Just By Standing There, When The Possessed Took One Look At JESUS That Means Looking At Messiah’s Appearance Was Enough To Make The Possessed Man Whole, So JESUS CHRIST MUST OF BEEN PHYSICALLY BEAUTIFUL But NOT In A Worldly “ Beautiful “ Sense.

Are the eyewitness reports of alien abductions reliable, historically accurate?

Former Christian and atheist Derek Lambert from MythVision was recently arguing this, that has since been responded to by Mike Jones on InspiringPhilosophy with Erik Manning of Testify.

Also before Moses, the creation accounts were spread orally. Richer places that could write and afford papyrus/parchment paper wrote it down first.

Jesus is Lord and the real deal. Not a myth

Everything in this video is not true, the conclusion it’s the opposite the first Christian’s did not believe he was god The other examples are honestly weak (busy can’t go into detail unless someone wants) This video only affirms barts claim of it starting in John

Hell is cast into the lake of fire--so while hell is the separation from God and therefore a place of torment--the fate of hell is to be cast into the place called the lake of fire where suffering will exist forever.

How beautifully convoluted and condescending

Can't imagine how many people have rejected God and the Bible because of the lies we are taught about Hell. We perish when we reject Christ...we get eternal life when we trust Him. Just like John 3:16 says.

The bible is so important to those that believe that early Christian monks spent their entire lifetime copying one book by hand.

Thanks for the information, Amen Brother

Matthew 5:19 says, "Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven".

I think hell n heaven were made up to control us think about those crazy stories you’d here as a kid about if you go out past a certain time then you’ll get eaten by some monster there’s many different stories but it’s meant to teach usually children a lesson I think it’s the same kind of concept there except it’s when you die

The common grave.

Islam is the true religion, Alhamdulillah

So, you are not saved by repentance but saved by grace through Faith as mentioned in Ephesians 2:8, just like the book of Exodus, which speaks about how GOD saved the Israelites from the Egyptians, not how the Israelites saved themselves from the Egyptians, and God describes himself on who he is and how he acts in exodus as mentioned in Exodus 34:6, And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth (KJV), and he even mentions HIS name to Moses, which is JEHOVAH, as it says in Exodus 6:3. So GOD is literally the entire summary of the book of Exodus, he is the entire summary of the BIBLE

Amen!

Well of course AI knows nothing about hell. Machines don't burn in hell, humanity does.....

U can’t be homosexual and Christian it’s against God

An important point of correction. Paul was not quoting the Gospel of Luke relating to the Eucharist, Luke was quoting Paul. Paul wrote before Luke's Gospel.

The meaning of life is love.

Is death for unbelief a fair punishment? Especially for those who simply do not believe but would when they met god? I'd say no

Wes is too official

I'm a Bible believing Christian. It does not make sense that the same author would use 2 different types of measurements to count an amount of time, just one page apart for the same person.

The way you describe it, is exactly how morality developed in societies when larger groups, cities and nations developed. I'm a Bible believing Christian but the moral argument for God is simply weak. Don't steal and don't murder are kind of basic rules for any society that should be stable. Also, morality in the Bible is in no way fixed or objective. Quite the opposite. It's constantly developing. In the early texts of the OT, the children and grandchildren, etc. carried the sins of the parents. For example Deuteronomy tells us that illegitimate children cannot be part of the congregation for 10 generations to come. We don't believe that today. Even in the books of the prophets we already see that changing. I believe that it was in fact God who changed. If I can't believe in a God that changes (like before and after the flood for instance) I can't believe in the incarnation either. And what does Jesus teach when it comes to sin and judgment? "with whatever mete you measure, it shall be measured to you." That means - God even follows our subjective judgment about what we want to hold against others. So, morality is neither objective nor an argument for God. God is real and He is love and wants everyone to be saved. Sure, He will also judge us but by our own standards. The Bible isn't a rule book for how to get into heaven.

Has nobody read Acts 11:25-26? It literally says that Paul and Barnabus created Christianity. Early disciples were called followers of the Way. Paul was from the sect of the Natsroyee, considered a ringleader of this other sect, a Pharisee of Pharisees as he says, and a Roman citizen.

Has nobody read Acts 11:25-26? It literally says that Paul and Barnabus created Christianity. Early disciples were called followers of the Way. Paul was from the sect of the Natsroyee, considered a ringleader of this other sect, a Pharisee of Pharisees as he says, and a Roman citizen.

Has nobody read Acts 11:25-26? It literally says that Paul and Barnabus created Christianity. Early disciples were called followers of the Way. Paul was from the sect of the Natsroyee, considered a ringleader of this other sect, a Pharisee of Pharisees as he says, and a Roman citizen.

"Can there really be FREE WILL in Heaven? Richard Swinburne seems to think so!" ~~~ Is Richard Swinburne in Heaven that he can report truly and honestly, or is he just whistling in the dark, like most? Imagination? Belief infection? First, 'free-will/choice' is scientifically and philosophically impossible. One thing that the Saved/Enlightened/Mystic shows is that one thing that Salvation frees us from is the vanity and Pride of the egoic illusion of free-will. Not only is there no free-will in Heaven, there is no free-will anywhere. Not you, not me, not God.

Listen to proper scholars and not apologists. Look up: *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei

My favorite contradiction is in the original ending to the book of Mark: "8 Trembling and bewildered, the women went out and fled from the tomb. They said nothing to anyone, because they were afraid." VS Matthew who cleaned this up with: "8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples." Pretty important detail to get wrong.

a real snooz

The question "Is the Bible contradictory?" is useless. Everything, from my grandmother's pancake recipe to the US Constitution, is contradictory. The right questions might be, "Is the Bible sound enough to understand most of the history of the Jewish people?", "Is the Bible sound enough to serve as a source for personal introspection?", or "Is the Bible sound enough to be the one and only guide for my life and my afterlife?" I don't care whether there are one or two different origin stories in the Bible or any other book. I care for the nuanced and measured use of the information in any book. And if you want to throw away the nuance and declare that any book, religious or secular, contains absolute truth, I pity you. Any non-mathematical book, that is.

The title justifies that bible has tons of contradictions

Thanks Dan and Dave. A very well presented seminar on how to think clearly, objectively and rationally (as well as generously) about Biblical interpretation and understanding. Very helpful.

By the age of 14, I had read the Bible, against my will, countless times from Genesis 1:1 to Revelations 22:21 but no new knowledge ever surfaced out. All of my questions only lead to dead ends; 'because God wants it that way'. I couldn't seem to rid myself of this bug called faith. I pressed on and continue to seek the “great truth” in the Bible but the "sacred perfect word" of my "perfect God" contradicted itself exposing more and more of its own imperfection. It contradicts itself on matters of justice, for the same just "Perfect God" who assured me that sons shall not be punished for the sins of their fathers turns around and destroys an entire household for the sin of one man. It was this same "Perfect God" who afflicted thousands of his innocent people with plague and death to punish their evil king David for taking a census (?!). It was this same "Perfect God" who allowed the humans to slaughter his "Perfect Son" because the "Perfect God" had botched his own creation. I began to question more and more, for instance, how many have been stoned, burned, slaughtered, raped, and enslaved because of this "Perfect God’s" skewed sense of justice. But the Bible could not confirm itself in mundane earthly matters and I started to discover that I couldn't trust it on moral and spiritual matters any longer. Amazingly, I had discovered a new, useful and powerful tool called critical thinking that allowed me to re-examine the Bible; which in turn prevented me to continue accepting it as the "true word of God”. By age 25 I had the great opportunity to weigh both sides of the spectrum between religion and science. One year later it became clear to me that faith has only proven to be an intellectual weakness, and a significant barrier to scientific knowledge and moral progress. Faith has proven equivalent to massive hysteria such as crusades, burning times, inquisitions, holy Wars and the list went on. I began to change as my knowledge base grew and felt compelled to make some serious adjustments in my life. I asked myself one day, how can God possibly expect me to view faith as the greatest way to glorify him, let alone demand this of me. The most important point to remember here though, is that if I didn't believe, I would be thrown in a lake of fire to suffer for eternity. This to me began to look like the greatest evil than a lack of the "virtue" of faith, or anything else conceivable. The more I questioned the less I found myself to continue the insanity of giving worship to a God so cruel! It was not until after age 26 that I came to grips with myself, accepting the fact that the idea of a higher power is not probable in light of current scientific data. And concluded that religion is a crack of nonsense used as a tool in order to control weak-minded people who are unable to face reality without a crutch

thanks for your work on this! super helpful!

can you explain it from other mythos perspective?

Bs

Tree of knowledge of good and evil. So many people forget that last part.