I don't think science has disproved a god/gods or theism (or, at least deism). But critical thought disproves much of Christian belief without stretching the belief to fit reality as some kind of ever changing metaphor - which is a tactic that can prove all religion, paganism, and other fairy tales. Christianity, as an important (and IMO interesting) part of history, exists. I think it's alright if people and their communities practice their religion - the only time I see it as problematic is when they want to use it trample the rights of other people, invading our schools and politics. But that's more the fault of UnChristian Christians rather than the fault of Christianity itself.
The very act of holding unjustifiable beliefs reflects a poor epistemological foundation. Beliefs inform actions and actions affect the self and others. That is to say that any of belief of this magnitude is dangerous and almost always leads to influence in others lives. People vote, parent, teach, police, judge, form exclusionary / exclusive relationships and when held up by false pillars of reasoning are a huge detriment to the world. The flaws in thinking an entire extended reality exists without any objective justification also exposes a fundamentally poor thinking process at their core. That flawed thinking can spill into non religious areas too like; conspiracies, magic, racism, sexism, political misalignment, Dunning-Kruger effects etc etc. keep in mind many of those are in-fact products of religion.
Religion is literally non-falsifiable. It doesn't matter what science says because it can always be explained away with "God just made it seem that way to test your faith. "
The reason why most scientists who believed in God before they became scientists and still believe in God is a simple one. They were likely brought up in a Christian background in a Christian country and in probably a Christian family. As such Christianity is just built into their persona and their culture. Just like many things we learn from our parents many of us don't question those facts and take it as unspoken truth which we live with for the rest of our lives without confronting or consciously being aware of, much like any other culture.
Science cannot disprove or prove god, by definition. God is an unfalsifiable idea, so you cannot prove or disprove him. You can always, always come up with an explanation for the universe that includes god, no matter how much of it is explained by science. That doesn't mean that god is real, either. If somebody claims to have proven or disproven god using science, they're lying to you.
Your general idea is correct but not quite so as if theists claim a god interacts in our reality in any manner, that interaction would be objective and verifiable to us. If a god 's influence was quantifiable or measurable in our realm that would be of methodological naturalism (science). A god that exists within the supernatural exclusively is equivalent to not existing at all to us and is where the unfalsifiable comes in.
Thing is, we'll never really know since the bible was written 60 years after man called Jesus died. For all we know it was a black woman named Shin and everything was just a game of ancient hot telephone.
Good video. Good content. A lot of truth packed into a short video. And well-made technically. May God bless many people through this video and this ministry!
Yes, lets explain how a religion built on bronze age mythology that describes magic and miracles is relevant in a modern world, where for some astounding reason, this all powerful super being who loves me and wants me to believe in him, can't seem to send a text message letting us know he is OK. What was once god of the gaps, it now quite literally god of the ignorant and desperate. I do not begrudge people their philological blankies, but please spare us the justifications for the self delusions.
I think science was a little late. Christianity did a great job of disproving itself.
sick burn, how much dawkins or R/atheism did you have to read to copy paste that??? =0
@@inquisitiveferret5690 Glad the truth upsets you so much.
@@inquisitiveferret5690 oh no, the stereotypes have gotten to you
At this point even if we discovered something that resembles proof of the Devine it wouldn't be Christian 😂
@@Lightbearer616 not upset, because neither of your charges are true. Just disappointed in the early 2000's fedora tipping drive by comment.
The question in the title is flawed as nothing has yet proved Christianity to begin with.
I totally agree.
Well yeah, but there's people who think Christianity had been debunked. So it really isn't flawed.
@@MrFossil367ab45gfyth it has been debunked in that it has been called out over every claim and never been objectively verified.
It's not about disproving god. Science wants evidence to prove god, and it's still pretty silent in that front.
Science shows us why people believe in God and how religions form. Whatever God you believe in follows this formula too.
I don't think science has disproved a god/gods or theism (or, at least deism). But critical thought disproves much of Christian belief without stretching the belief to fit reality as some kind of ever changing metaphor - which is a tactic that can prove all religion, paganism, and other fairy tales.
Christianity, as an important (and IMO interesting) part of history, exists. I think it's alright if people and their communities practice their religion - the only time I see it as problematic is when they want to use it trample the rights of other people, invading our schools and politics. But that's more the fault of UnChristian Christians rather than the fault of Christianity itself.
The very act of holding unjustifiable beliefs reflects a poor epistemological foundation. Beliefs inform actions and actions affect the self and others. That is to say that any of belief of this magnitude is dangerous and almost always leads to influence in others lives. People vote, parent, teach, police, judge, form exclusionary / exclusive relationships and when held up by false pillars of reasoning are a huge detriment to the world.
The flaws in thinking an entire extended reality exists without any objective justification also exposes a fundamentally poor thinking process at their core. That flawed thinking can spill into non religious areas too like; conspiracies, magic, racism, sexism, political misalignment, Dunning-Kruger effects etc etc. keep in mind many of those are in-fact products of religion.
It's not science's job to disprove your beliefs. It's you job to find testable methods and use science to test them.
Religion is literally non-falsifiable. It doesn't matter what science says because it can always be explained away with "God just made it seem that way to test your faith. "
Science does not "disprove" claims, especially unfalsifiable ones.
The reason why most scientists who believed in God before they became scientists and still believe in God is a simple one. They were likely brought up in a Christian background in a Christian country and in probably a Christian family.
As such Christianity is just built into their persona and their culture.
Just like many things we learn from our parents many of us don't question those facts and take it as unspoken truth which we live with for the rest of our lives without confronting or consciously being aware of, much like any other culture.
Science cannot disprove or prove god, by definition. God is an unfalsifiable idea, so you cannot prove or disprove him. You can always, always come up with an explanation for the universe that includes god, no matter how much of it is explained by science. That doesn't mean that god is real, either. If somebody claims to have proven or disproven god using science, they're lying to you.
Your general idea is correct but not quite so as if theists claim a god interacts in our reality in any manner, that interaction would be objective and verifiable to us. If a god 's influence was quantifiable or measurable in our realm that would be of methodological naturalism (science). A god that exists within the supernatural exclusively is equivalent to not existing at all to us and is where the unfalsifiable comes in.
@@j-joe-jeans yeah, if someone can show me objective falsifiable evidence of a god interacting with reality, I would convert in an instant.
@@Console.Log01 I agree.
2000+ years and zero such evidence.
I concur!
@@j-joe-jeans
Yes, you did a good job there.
Thing is, we'll never really know since the bible was written 60 years after man called Jesus died. For all we know it was a black woman named Shin and everything was just a game of ancient hot telephone.
Good video. Good content. A lot of truth packed into a short video. And well-made technically. May God bless many people through this video and this ministry!
Yes, lets explain how a religion built on bronze age mythology that describes magic and miracles is relevant in a modern world, where for some astounding reason, this all powerful super being who loves me and wants me to believe in him, can't seem to send a text message letting us know he is OK. What was once god of the gaps, it now quite literally god of the ignorant and desperate. I do not begrudge people their philological blankies, but please spare us the justifications for the self delusions.
Science, logic, and Christianity, go hand in hand with science.
Jesus lives! ♥️ and is God 🙏🏻 Christ ✝️ and King 👑
Please demonstrate what you claim.
@@j-joe-jeans what claim?
@@JadDragon The claim of a god, the claim that logic and science go hand in hand with Christianity.
@@j-joe-jeans what do you consider evidence?
For instance go see inspiring philosophy to see about the relationship between science and Christianity
@@j-joe-jeans and there are plenty of good apologetics channels, have you heard of William L Craig for instance?