Yeah. The a6000 default color mode is kind of drab by comparison. You can change this to "deep" and get closer. I use "clear" as it is pretty close to pure colors. Nothing you cannot boost in post. The big difference is the a6000 won't shoot 4k video. But as far as photos go, the APS-C sensor sony uses hasn't changed much (if at all) since the a6000. The newer cams have better processors and programming while still using the same sensor. I love my a6000. I rock it with vintage lenses like the Jupiter 11 and it is just awesome. Full of character. And cheap.
Thanks for your helpful and detailed insights! That's a great pointer to use the "clear" mode to get some natural tones going on. Unfortunately there will be some banding if you push the A6000 footage too hard of course. I see you did your homework here :) Nice! Vintage lenses are underrated these days, never heard of the Jupiter 11, but definitely gotta check that one out, thank you for the recommendation and sharing!
Aside from lack of stabilization and colors being a bit brown and green, this A6000 holds its own against newer and more expensive cameras. ☺️ buy a good lens and this thing will be all you need.
it's actually performs a lot better in photography. But the newer models like the A6300, A6400, etc. and also the ZV-E10 have a much better autofocus if you considering buying a new camera
It won't shoot 4k vid, so it's better at photography than video. Compared to newer cams it holds up well with its well balanced sensor and low light abilities. The key is getting good glass. Buy an a6000 (about $350 for a used one in excellent condition) and then blow $300 to $800 on a better power lens than it comes with. Get a good auto focus tele zoom (around $500). The included auto focus power zoom is OK but it won't do anything interesting. Get a good manual prime 135 mm ($120) and a manual fast-50 with an f below 2 ($80) and you'll have a great experience. A manual prime 200mm is also handy ($80) but challenging to use since no image stabilization. Antique lenses easily adapt to this camera with a m42 to e-mount adapter and there are a lot of inexpensive excellent antique glass out there. ($30 to $200) If you get manual lenses (no auto focus) the a6000 had a LOT of features to make manual focus easy and precise. I only do manual focus now that I know how to use these features. My preferred lens is a manual focus Jupiter 11 (a 135 prime). Just make sure what you buy isn't fungus infected or otherwise dirty. A lot of cheap antique lenses are basically only useful as paperweights.
I would say in these examples it's not very noticeable, but the A7S III has a wider dynamic range and this makes it possible to see more details overall without clipping in the shadows or highlights
I’ve a feeling that the photos from my 6400 is lacking the color punch. However the similar shots from Nikon z50 got better colors and contrast. How can I get the nice saturation with punchy colors right away? I am a hobbyist and do not want to go into post processing. Can I set a custom picture profile for photos in 6400
That depends on what you understand under the term cinematic. But I assume you mean footage that looks like it's coming from a movie. Well I would say yes, but you have to understand how lighting works, because that will actually make your footage look good or not at the end. And also keep in mind that you might be a little bit limited when I comes to dynamic range and color grading if you're into that stuff. Let me know if you want to learn more about these topics and I will try to create a video explaining these points.
I don't know anything about camera but I need one. What would be better? panasonic g7 or sony a6000. I don't really care about some extra features and all I just want the best quality
Save your money for video. The a6000 does not have log profiles such as s log 2 or 3. Which means you can’t properly color grade. It’s better to save your money and get something better. I’d still stick with Sony just not this particular camera
Well it depends. Here are some features that's gonna make you go for the G7, like the flippy screen, 4K up to 30fps, microphone jack and also it's a newer camera. The sensor is a little bit smaller, but I heard the quality is better on the G7. I don't have a real life comparison, but that's what I heard so far, especially for videos
Sony is absolutely leading in the market with their innovative products. Unfortunately their pricing can be also very over the top for some products like the G-Master lenses, which are almost tree times as expensive as other brands.
Video quality in a6000 is a big disappointment. Don't buy it for videos. Lack of stabilization, and bad looking dynamic scenes make it almost unusable for vide capturing.
I mean if you're pixel peeping yes. On the small screen everything looks kinda good and it's probably more than enough for a lot of people, but as soon as you want to export something for a bigger screen you will see a huge difference compared to newer cameras
@@AdityaLoshali1 I just checked out some comparisons and the Sony 35mm 1.8 is the winner in most cases because of it's small form factor, OSS, etc. And the Sigma lens "only" has it's advantage in terms of an 1.4 aperture instead of 1.8. Pricewise they are also almost in the same category and yeah to answer your question, the lenses are almost the same. The Sigma 30mm is equivalent to a 45mm and the Sony 35mm is like a 52.2mm which doesn't really makes a huge difference
That's the point, you don't need all the expensive gear if you know how to use cheaper gear. Of course it comes with a couple limitations, which don't apply in every scenario
Awesome, the Sony a6000 still holds up!
Absolutely! After all these years
It's all about color grading then you can catch up with advance tech.❤
@@aureajourdaine1997 I agree!
Yes, been shooting music videos with it every since it came out and it’s now 2023 🙌🏾
Going to get the Sony 50mm g master
Yeah. The a6000 default color mode is kind of drab by comparison. You can change this to "deep" and get closer. I use "clear" as it is pretty close to pure colors. Nothing you cannot boost in post.
The big difference is the a6000 won't shoot 4k video. But as far as photos go, the APS-C sensor sony uses hasn't changed much (if at all) since the a6000. The newer cams have better processors and programming while still using the same sensor.
I love my a6000. I rock it with vintage lenses like the Jupiter 11 and it is just awesome. Full of character. And cheap.
Thanks for your helpful and detailed insights!
That's a great pointer to use the "clear" mode to get some natural tones going on. Unfortunately there will be some banding if you push the A6000 footage too hard of course.
I see you did your homework here :)
Nice! Vintage lenses are underrated these days, never heard of the Jupiter 11, but definitely gotta check that one out, thank you for the recommendation and sharing!
Can you combine A6000 with cine lens? Like 7artisan T1.05 series
What lense does the guy in the video use? I have the stock lense ands it’s trash. I can never get a pic like that
I have a a6000 and I’m trying to find the best lens to buy for cars shots
Sony's products are gems of a lifetime, those who know the worth and quality will cherish them no matter how old. I am having xperia S
Absolutely! I'm glad you agree though, nice the newer models also look so promising
Aside from lack of stabilization and colors being a bit brown and green, this A6000 holds its own against newer and more expensive cameras. ☺️ buy a good lens and this thing will be all you need.
Which lens?
@@KatieStantonBlog I got the Sony E 18-105 F4 and it's all i've needed for all my photoshoots, videos.
Sony a6000 is good for photography too?
it's actually performs a lot better in photography. But the newer models like the A6300, A6400, etc. and also the ZV-E10 have a much better autofocus if you considering buying a new camera
@@DaniDothanks
It won't shoot 4k vid, so it's better at photography than video. Compared to newer cams it holds up well with its well balanced sensor and low light abilities.
The key is getting good glass. Buy an a6000 (about $350 for a used one in excellent condition) and then blow $300 to $800 on a better power lens than it comes with. Get a good auto focus tele zoom (around $500). The included auto focus power zoom is OK but it won't do anything interesting.
Get a good manual prime 135 mm ($120) and a manual fast-50 with an f below 2 ($80) and you'll have a great experience. A manual prime 200mm is also handy ($80) but challenging to use since no image stabilization.
Antique lenses easily adapt to this camera with a m42 to e-mount adapter and there are a lot of inexpensive excellent antique glass out there. ($30 to $200)
If you get manual lenses (no auto focus) the a6000 had a LOT of features to make manual focus easy and precise. I only do manual focus now that I know how to use these features. My preferred lens is a manual focus Jupiter 11 (a 135 prime). Just make sure what you buy isn't fungus infected or otherwise dirty. A lot of cheap antique lenses are basically only useful as paperweights.
Definitely just as good as modern cameras, post processing is also a very large portion of these comparisons.
I wanna know why the background in A7S just looks better
I would say in these examples it's not very noticeable, but the A7S III has a wider dynamic range and this makes it possible to see more details overall without clipping in the shadows or highlights
@@DaniDo to me it was quite noticeable, i feel like the background caught my eye more than what was in focus. The dynamic range is top 1
I’ve a feeling that the photos from my 6400 is lacking the color punch. However the similar shots from Nikon z50 got better colors and contrast. How can I get the nice saturation with punchy colors right away? I am a hobbyist and do not want to go into post processing. Can I set a custom picture profile for photos in 6400
Using vivid picture profile will be more vibrant and also Adobe RGB instead of sRGB.
@@Hari-Photo-Videos yes. Recently switched to adobe rgb. Looks great
What lens are you using for the A6000
I used the 35mm 1.8 APS-C lens from Sony in the video
Which lens is this?
It's the Sony 35mm (APS-C) vs. the Zeiss 55mm (fullframe) on the A7 III
What lens are you using on the a6000?
I used the Sony 35mm 1.8 in this video
What lens did you use for your a6000 for this video?
I used the 35mm 1.8 from Sony itself
@@DaniDo Looks great! What settings did you use to get the bokeh?
It's cold out there I guess
🤷♂️
Creep
Hello, what lens did you use for the Sony a6000?
That’s what I was about to ask
Hey there, I used the 35mm 1.8 from Sony
What's the reason that the Sony 6000 still provides a great SOOC images?
Well they actually didn't change the sensor in the new APS-C cameras like the ZV-E10 because that sensor is still delivering such a good image.
Okay but what lens?
Song?
Con cuál lente lo haces ?
A6000 good for making cinematic video?
That depends on what you understand under the term cinematic. But I assume you mean footage that looks like it's coming from a movie. Well I would say yes, but you have to understand how lighting works, because that will actually make your footage look good or not at the end. And also keep in mind that you might be a little bit limited when I comes to dynamic range and color grading if you're into that stuff. Let me know if you want to learn more about these topics and I will try to create a video explaining these points.
@@DaniDo i would love 😊 to learn about this topic more. Make dedicated video on these topic . I think more people wants it.❤️
What lens you use to get this nice blur
Wide aperture lenses would do these
@@eavitugjr thanks, in a month ive learnt so much, even got a camera for myself ha
Are these raw videos? Or edited?
I don't know anything about camera but I need one. What would be better? panasonic g7 or sony a6000. I don't really care about some extra features and all I just want the best quality
Sony
Save your money for video. The a6000 does not have log profiles such as s log 2 or 3. Which means you can’t properly color grade. It’s better to save your money and get something better. I’d still stick with Sony just not this particular camera
Well it depends. Here are some features that's gonna make you go for the G7, like the flippy screen, 4K up to 30fps, microphone jack and also it's a newer camera. The sensor is a little bit smaller, but I heard the quality is better on the G7. I don't have a real life comparison, but that's what I heard so far, especially for videos
Sony products have always been very good, especially now, they are just as good, speaking of all the types of cameras Sony has are good
Sony has the best everything tbh PlayStation, mics ,cameras ,etc 🔥💯
Sony is absolutely leading in the market with their innovative products. Unfortunately their pricing can be also very over the top for some products like the G-Master lenses, which are almost tree times as expensive as other brands.
Que lente usas amigo?
35mm 1.8
Sony name is enough 💪
Sony is huge!💪
Af of my a6000 not good enough so i got the mf lens
That's nice! Sometimes I prefer mf over af, depending on the scene
Does 6000 have 4k?
yes but "only" if you film in 25 or 24 fps
Do the same with kit lens version!
will do!
Video quality in a6000 is a big disappointment. Don't buy it for videos. Lack of stabilization, and bad looking dynamic scenes make it almost unusable for vide capturing.
I mean if you're pixel peeping yes. On the small screen everything looks kinda good and it's probably more than enough for a lot of people, but as soon as you want to export something for a bigger screen you will see a huge difference compared to newer cameras
What lense for the a6000
I used the 35mm 1.8 lens from Sony on the A6000 which is equivalent to a ~50mm fullframe
@@DaniDo its great setup!! sel35f1.8 is one of my favorite lens
Is it better than Sigma 30mm 1.4?
Would I need both of them or the difference is little?
@@AdityaLoshali1 I just checked out some comparisons and the Sony 35mm 1.8 is the winner in most cases because of it's small form factor, OSS, etc. And the Sigma lens "only" has it's advantage in terms of an 1.4 aperture instead of 1.8. Pricewise they are also almost in the same category and yeah to answer your question, the lenses are almost the same. The Sigma 30mm is equivalent to a 45mm and the Sony 35mm is like a 52.2mm which doesn't really makes a huge difference
@@DaniDo Thanks for this! 🙌🏼
Love my a6000, will never part with it.
Such a good camera!
Dynamic range dont lies
What song is this
am I wrong?
@@crazygamer241 ?
@@dylansmith3 the title is "Am i wrong"
😆🤣
A7s3 big diff
Hehe I'm glad you like the A7S III look better!
A big difference honestly
Only a filmmaker's eye can see that :O
high dinamic range
Color range in siii next level 10bit
hmmm a7iii have more dymanic range
more bits for color grading, a higher bitrate and definitely more dynamic range though
LOOCKS THE SAME
That's the point, you don't need all the expensive gear if you know how to use cheaper gear. Of course it comes with a couple limitations, which don't apply in every scenario
she is beautyfull😍
hehe :D
I think Use the cup bra is more important than u smile to the photoshoot
What do you mean?
Sony a 6000 better😂
haha well for this example it can almost hold up to the A7S III, but the dynamic range is a little bit worse, you can see it in the sky :)
CRINGE 🤣🤦🏻♂️
нормальная телочка
Nadie entendimos tu video.... a que conclución llegaste