The Prosecutor Defends a Skeezy Cop plus Verdict
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июн 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theduiguyplus
Get your Merch Here: the-dui-guys-store.creator-sp...
Need an attorney? Call 502-931-6788 or email Larry@LarryFormanLaw.com
OR
Schedule an appointment: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work together to solve your problem!
Connect With the DUI Guy+:
Website: www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com
X: x.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
TikTok: / theduiguyplus
Facebook: / theduiguyplus
Instagram: / theduiguyplus
LinkedIn: / theduiguyplus
Twitch: / theduiguyplus
Locals: theduiguyplus.locals.com/
CashApp: cash.app/LarryForman
#BuckleUp #ItsTheLaw #criminaldefenselawyer
You will NOT BELIEVE this case is real.
I still don't.
But it happened.
These are the Closing Arguments and the Reading of the Verdict.
Some pieces are missing, sadly, because the judge either forgot to turn on the record or the recording messed up. I apologize for that on their behalf.
Background: Client was stopped for allegedly weaving in and out of lane. She was facetiming her husband. Gets pulled over and given field sobriety tests (she was crying and her face was red and puffy so the cop suspected something was wrong). However, she does well on the tests, and the cop sees that my client is not the smartest person in the world, so he takes a liking to her.
This is a small town, and the cops have no body cameras, so the officer arrests her (without ever putting hand cuffs on her) searches her (during which he makes pit-stops by groping her breasts, buttocks, and crotch areas), places her in the back of his cruiser and takes her to jail.
They make a pit-stop in a dark, abandoned building where he "claims" that she should "do a urine test" but she is frightened as all hell at this point because she feels sexual advances and declines because she sees no lights coming out of the building or any cars around. Then he takes her to jail.
When they arrive at the jail, she asks to smoke a cigarette and call her mom, which he allows. After which he takes her phone and asks if she has any nude pictures on there or any pictures of drugs. She admits to having some nudes, but no drugs.
He goes through her phone, finds the pictures and goes through them. He also finds a 1 minute 25 second porn video my client's husband and her recorded on their WEDDING NIGHT and WATCHES IT IN FRONT OF HER!!!!! Immediately after, he says he is going to give her his phone number (which he leaves in her property) and encourages her to call him BEFORE she leaves Kentucky.
She is then booked and released. She fails to call him, and so he LIES on his report, writes that she ADMITTED TO BOTH "Smoking AND shooting methamphetamine prior to driving" which never happened, and forgets about the case.
Luckily the jury saw through his bs and acquitted her.
It is important to note, that after she testified, the cop NEVER REBUTTED HER TESTIMONY RE: SEXUAL ADVANCES. Which obviously means that he DID IT and ADMITS TO IT. During her testimony he was VERY ANTSY and his legs wouldn't stop shaking, so says my client.
I still can't believe this is still going on in 2019, but I am happy she hired me and we got the truth out into the open.
Judge: Honorable Robert T. Yoakum, Bell County District Court Division 3
Defense attorney: Larry Forman, a.k.a. the DUI Guy
Prosecutor: Christopher F. Douglas
Arresting Officer: Trooper Joey Brigmon, Kentucky State Police
00:00 - Coming UP!
00:17 - Jury Instructions
4:53 - The DUI Guy Closing
11:44 - Government Closing
15:30 - Defense Objection
16:17 - VERDICT Reading
18:20 - Watch NEXT
![Megan Thee Stallion - Otaku Hot Girl [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/USxIYOaIpig/mqdefault.jpg)
![Megan Thee Stallion - Rattle [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qY6qwqVCsww/mqdefault.jpg)
Sounds like a predator with a badge, if it's true.
But he had no reason to give her his personal number.
And 99% of the time the prosecutor ALWAYS favor the cops even when they're caught lying
EVEN when caught lying ! Judges are just as big a threat to freedom as cops !
If he did give her his number to use as a drug informant why didn't the deputy mention it
That prosecutor was a piece of work. He was shaking and angry because he knew he had lost and his client was a creep
Cop was not prosecutor's client. He was a witness. And why is a witness allowed to sit at prosecutor's table?
@@aboveusonlysky2878I've always wondered that too, but apparently that's just how they do it in Kentucky.
These cops get away with way, way too much crap. We the people tell the truth and prosecutors think it’s funny. Call us liars, plant frugs on us etc. it’s pathetic. I just went through a whole bunch of BS. Accused of stuff that was not true. Tyler Hitch did a wonderful job and all of my charges were thrown out! Thanks guys!
I've never heard so much of Papers in my life LOL that judge acted like he didn't know what to do with himself, and or his microphone was way too loud. I'm glad your defendant was found not guilty on the DUI
So did the pervert cop keep his job ! ?
Of course he did.They investigated themselves like usual.
Why would you even ask a silly question like this 😅 We all know cops only get fired for hurting another wearing a badge 😂
That’s the type of person our worthless government wants patrolling our streets - otherwise they’d fire him...
Also how can he say “she was driving under the influence of methamphetamine” when he had nothing proving that? Shouldn’t be allowed. He should only be able to say “the officer testified that she said this” but he shouldn’t be able to just claim that she was under the influence of meth without something showing that.
the look of defeat in the officers after it was read is amazing he knew he done it & got caught
AHA! WE GOT HER ON THE SEATBELT CHARGES!
What in the world is this judge reading????? Prosecutor sounds like a used car salesman! The cop is creepy af!!! Glad she was found not guilty!!
I can agree with the jury, prosecutor did not prove she was on drugs at the time, but she admitted to no seat belt and to being on the phone distracted driving. I don't find the prosecutor credible and if anything he sounds nasty wanting to punish an American citizen.
This Prosecutor didn’t do his homework!! The cop is a sleaz ball yet he’s standing behind all the wrong decisions of this cop!!
and your surprised? DA always backs the cop
I wonder how many females he has done this to. After her testimony, she should have everything "Not Guilty".
I understand how she felt. I had issues with a law enforcement officer in the past. I got so that I wouldn’t leave my home in the car by myself. He pulled me over every time I left my house. He never gave me a citation because I didn’t do anything. But he sure scared me. One time he told me that he pulled me over because the spare tire in the back of my truck was bald. Really??!!! My family has a large amount of law enforcement in it. It still scared me. To this day 30 yrs later I still get scared when I’m pulled over. I’ve only had 2 tickets in my life.
I think it’s so wrong the defendant has to pay for the jury.
the state is the one that brought charges that warranted a jury trial there for the state should pay not be added onto the fine for defendant!
Guilty = you pay
If the defendant is guilty of the charges that brought her to court then the defendant pays.
I will agree with you here in this case, she already admitted the reckless driving and driving without a seat belt. But not the DUI.
The state charged her with DUI, she was found not guilty of that charge, so the state should pay legal expenses.
She caught a reckless and a seatbelt, but managed to avoid the DUI/DWI, so congrats thats a huge win. i am shocked that there was zero footage anywhere though... what kind of police have no station footage or body cams these days?!?
Proof that cameras are needed.
Sleazy prosecutor and cop!
Was she able to get her license cleared, and back into driving a commercial vehicle?
dayum! that court bailiff looks like he gonna keel over just walking from the bench to the jury room! do they not have to be physically fit to do that job? he looks like a liability to the tax payers that pay for his health insurance! where does his chin start and his neck start or end?
Doesn’t that cop need a warrant to go through her phone?? What a Sleazy cop!!
She should file a civil rights lawsuit against him for going through her phone that’s against the fourth amendment . he should lose his qualified immunity because it’s a civil rights case of illegal search and seizure.
Should have charges filed against him for soiling his uniform after looking at her intimate photos.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This prosecutor is a PAB!!
He’s so upset my a$$
That bailiff does seem too thrilled with the DUI Guy... lol...
If he's a cop he ls guilty period.😅😅
So the cop didn't get punished for the illegal search of her phone?
The Gang Member in blue lies under oath and the prosecuteor and jugde know it, but he still leaves the courtroom without punishment,that says everything about the jugde and the prosecutor! Corrupt from the head down!
I belive that she put up a great testimony that hurt her in reckless driving, saying how upset she was with her personal life, which made the story believable
NG on the stiffest charge. Well done Counselor Forman! 🎉
Great job Larry as usual!❤❤❤❤
The judges orders to the jury are prejudicial. He states you will find the defendant guilty if this evidence is present, or words to that effect. How about you will find the defendant innocent if the state has not proven its case beyond reasonable doubt.
This is a great example of how the judge, prosecutor and cop protect themselves and each other. The phone number that the sleazy ball cop gave the lady, should have been called right then and there, infront of the jury, on speaker, to prove that it was his number. That’s all the foundation you need.
Was he not burden shifting when he was saying all you were doing was attacking the other side?
Watch this cop! If he's done these outrageous behaviors, he WILL do it again!
This prosecutor illegally introduced evidence post trial. He should be reprimanded by the court as the evidence when the ticket was entered was not admitted.
I can't believe that the cop wasn't investigated.
Thisl is out of control
I so knew that they were going to split the baby on this one! So if they didn’t believe the cop on the DUI why did they believe him on the reckless driving and seatbelt violation. This should never have been filed as reckless driving in the first place. It fits the definition of careless driving but not reckless!
I hope this young lady gets a dashcam for her vehicle(s). Plus password her cellphone and stop talking to police all together. Law enforcement are not her(your) friends.
I no longer have a car but if I get one, it'll have multiple cameras.
She got off pretty good
if she refused voluntary tests why did they not getan electronic warrant for blood draw also i thought if requested you had to do it as part of holding a CDL
Zi wish they had found her not guilty on ALL the charges.
She basically admitted to not seat belt and driving while crying on the phone. If she never mentioned being on the phone and instead said she swerved to avoid a squirrel I'd say ok. But she painted a picture of herself driving distracted.
I wonder how many other people have fallen victim to this predator with a badge.
You know other attorney's hate going up against this guy.
How can prosecutors purposely put innocent people in jail and just not care? They should go to jail for all the time added up that was given to those that were innocent
Lol. Skeezy is a good adjective
I'm so glad that the cop had to sit there for that. If they had found her not guilty on everything it would not have sent the message it did. Yes, she wasn't driving well. No, you lied and are a pos!!!!!
Sue that horrible cop
I had predicted a split decision, but I thought they would only convict on the seat belt charge.
She admitted to driving whilst video calling her husband. That's reckless driving.
You know it's Kentucky when the word ARREST is 4+ syllables. I'm from Knox County.
Amazing case! You were right….SKEEZY
7:27 I sense a theme here. Proctor 1.0?
Proctor²!
@@daveschannel747 Proctor? I hardly know 'er.
Congrats on the victory. Forfeitures and specifically DUIs are a profit center for a municipality. Just to speculate, this appears to be a 'value added' charge which this police dept. might routinely add to minor infractions to increase the profitability of judicial proceedings.
That was the right result. She admitted to driving whilst video calling her husband and whilst being emotionally upset - which was reckless driving.
The DUI was a his word against hers and therefore a lot of reasonable doubt. Even if she was lying, the cop and the commonwealth did a terrible job of gathering evidence. To the extent that they and the prosecutor were jokers for bringing this to trial.
And I personally found her testimony to be more credible than his.
If only she had some form of concrete evidence to back up her claims and get this cop convicted...
But of course the cop was too cunning for that - this time. And his supervision is too lax, because there's a real possibility he's been a serial sleazebag and there's no check nor controls to catch him.
Thank u for getting me out of so many duis. Thank u and 5150
Fair result I guess for the Dui, I think the only reason for the reckless was because of initial traffic stop and lack of seat belt, still unsure how he saw the lack of seatbelt from behind the 18 wheeler truck. Why did he not take her into the building so they could do bloods and urine. Why would he produce his own cup??
I think the reckless driving was for facetiming while driving, when she was admittedly very upset. I think Larry's plan was to admit that and just fight the DUI charge, because that charge alone could have destroyed her ability to operate as a trucker.
HELLO DUI GUY!!! WATCHING YOU IS VERY EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIVE. KEEP IT UP😎
Great job.. I bet he thought he was going to get her back in his jail..if I were her, I'd get out of that town and stay out..creepy cop. Actually, he should be fired..
He should be closely watched by his supervision, even extending to them setting a honey trap on him.
If they gather sufficient evidence to prosecute him, he should be fired and jailed.
Until then he's innocent until proven guilty.
The trouble is: the cops are hopeless at investigating the cops. There's far too much of a thin blue line them and us culture.
B E A Utiful! Love it, amazing job as always 😊
Oh dang!!!! You won! Nice
Oh yea...LOVE your sense of humor too.😂
I’m not sure, but I think in Pennsylvania if you get a reckless driving charge with a CDL, you lose your CDL for a certain amount of time
The way the prosecutor reacted by defending the cop's honor in his closing argument was one of the least persuasive things I've ever seen. I think it's all he had to go on, though.
$100 plus $25= 125. Where did the other $43 come from
Just before the verdict was read, there’s an audible sigh of relief. Was that you, Larry or the prosecutor? 😊
Dude did she have any documents to show she couldn't read because of some medical issues i.was really looking for some documents that said because of a brain injury due to accident when she messed up.her knee
Was there enough evidence to investigate the officer for his sexual advances was there any video in the jail area that could have helped he story
In this day and age it is inexcusable not to have a video recording as an officer. The only time there would be an exception is if the officer has a body camera and that body camera has a bullet hole in it from a weapon that doesn't belong to the police force.
Also, to have no footage even when taken to the station is just plain and simple a case of destruction of evidence, by the police.
Bring in the FBI and close the whole district down and charge everyone who could have known that this happened. Not just the ones that did know, but the ones that should have known.
No video as an officer or government official? You are sent to prison!
Can you cover Ashleigh Merchant defending the Atty for the YSL trial in Ga? Raw Law maybe?
I have a question. When a cop goes through something like this and we find out hes just a dirty cop does that trigger an IA case
😂
Result
😮
Reckless driving my ass for crossing a center line, which is not even a infraction
Is that balifpissed at you?