"Do you have a massive steamer in your diaper right now Director?" "We are conducting an active investigation right now and will have to refer you to the department of investigation"
That actually kind of is why she couldn't answer certain questions, because it could reveal their operating procedures. What if some other lunatic tries this on another candidate? Or someone decides to try and "finish" the job. This shit probably shouldn't be televised. And if they want to get actual answers it should be private.
@@MrSupersonic2012actually that wouldn’t be the case because if it was classified she would just say “it’s classified” and they would just de-classify it and it there was a risk then it would be a private conversation instead
@@MrSupersonic2012 none of the questions would've jepardized their operations in any way. They all consisted in "Were you and your agency competent enough to have done anything in that situation, and have you provided the requested information for this hearing?" If anything, it just proves to the lunatics out there that the secret services have no idea what they're doing, and they could take advantage of it.
Or straight with the “well I don’t remember.” Or “I don’t have all the details in front of me but I will try my best to answer your questions” Honestly there are actually good ways to be deflective here but she isn’t a pro politician. Best would have been something like “this was a complicated failure, it cannot always be boiled down to yes or no questions but I will do my best”
The craziest thing is how she got both sides come together for grilling her, they emphasized they had to subpoena her to be present AND she leaked her opening statement to a bunch of worthless news outlets last minute. She put more effort into dodging and salvaging her non-existent reputation than addressing her screw up of a career.
"Answer this question with a yes or no. Do you understand how I want you to answer me?" "We are currently doing an investigation and will eventually come up with an adequate answer to your question." "DO YOU UNDERSTAND?" "I'm afraid I do not possess the necessary knowledge to answer your question."
Not really. The one who should resign is Trump's private security who were also on site and, because of this, gave the shooter an opportunity to "blend in" as just another of Lump's private mercs.
@@Polit_Burrois that the newest excuse? First a roof 100m away wasn’t in their perimeter. Then when it turned out to be a staging area, well, the slope was a health and safety hazard! Oh, wait, they had someone stationed on that roof, and pulled them off.. didn’t have someone on the water tower.. the roof they were on had a steeper slope.. Womp Womp. Now you want to blame private security, as if they’re above the secret service, or competent secret service wouldn’t be both aware of who they are AND have done an extensive background check on them.
gaining any significant power under late-stage capitalism inherently means you cannot be an honest working human. You must scheme and lie and betray, this is what our society produces
This whole act had a purpose and achieved it: allowing her to resign with her 80% pension + benefits, while not providing evidence against herself or her superiors. The simple fact that she wasn't fired and faced with criminal charges means she already won.
Yeah frustrating as it may seem in the damn hearing, all she has to do was answer the question with no answers and she gets to go home with that pension without any repercussions, she should’ve gotten NO pension and NO benefits for all the shit she has spouted in the hearing.
Yea people act as if her being fired ruins her life, when she's probably going to be spending the rest of her life on a beach sipping margaritas with a big smile on her face.
This is right and EXACTLY why you shouldn't vote for Biden/Harris. They should have FIRED her immediately. The fact that they didn't fire her AT ALL is a giant fuck you to Americans.
@@liljanos The bots are totally fine but I comment one thing about people with brain health problems and I get a warning about being "suspended or having my entire account terminated". Ridiculous.
She said that they didnt put secret service agents on the roof of the building the shooter was on because it was sloped and dangerous....Im glad she resigned because wtf.
Later it was said they had someone up there but they got down because it was hot. So nobody actually knows why, but the more stories that contradict the worse it gets
Two ESU lookouts were in a two story right behind the roof the shooter was on. But they left their post right before the shooter took position. You cant make this shit up.
Sloped roof.... yeah, roofers got it worse than agents. Poor lil guys never heard of a yoga mat stopping slippies, or an umbrella and a cola for it being hot. Next, it'll be "well, I _was_ going to stop the cat from pressing the red button, but I dropped a lego on the carpet a week ago, and it was too risky to get up."
"Mam what building are you in today?" "As far as the building I am in today, it is a building. Without all the details in front of me I will need to refer to my superior"
I know people that were at the rally screaming at secret service that there was a person on the roof with a gun and they said secret service did absolutely nothing about it.
@@restinpeacejoerogan4988I could be wrong but one of the snipers asked to shoot the shooter as was denied. Again I could be wrong I have not verified this uet
@@blastamaster It's also possible that she did it on purpose. DT has been so villified by lib media for the past 8 years that some people are genuinely convinced he's the second coming of adolf.
Bro even the head of the committee is scared of her. I dont want that smoke, giving me flash backs to getting grilled by my mom after being out all night
Let's be honest, these were mistakes that not even a Kindergartener would make. That's how completely useless at her job she was, so she did deserve all of this and far more.
Dei heir my guy. I don't how women who have never been in any confrontation have little no combat experience and know nothing about strategic warfares are made head of secret service😂.
I work in construction and when osha comes to a jobsite and asks you questions you are supposed to plead uncertainty with most questions unless you're exactly sure if you aren't a foreman. If you are the head of your department you cannot deflect or else you get reprimanded
Isn't she the one that wore the A on her chest trying to compare her situation to the situation of Hester Prynne in Nathaniel Hawthorne's book The Scarlet Letter
It's frustrating that these supposed inquests end up being sessions of non-answers and dodging. The essence of accountability critical to any democracy just seems to elude these circumstances.
This happens with every hearing, reminds me of the woolies/Coles hearing for price gouging and monopolistic behaviour. They also gave the same non-answers, there really should be harsh penalties for not answering the questions.
It has been this way for decades. People like the secret service director are scapegoats who take the blame for extreme negligence to cover up intentional plans
@Alex-vm6ef nah they were just actually incompetent Then again maybe they were so incompetent they failed the "real" plan 🤔 Pls srsly no conspiracies unless he actually gets yeeted though. As far as we know the CIA is batting 1 for 1 on siting us presidents
@@UltimateGattai If there was harsh penalties for that, heres how it would go: "Yes or no answers only, did you stop beating your wife?" Accused: "I have never beat my wife" "Sir, yes or no answers only!" Accused: "But I neve-" "You're full of shit" Harsh penalties ensue. The problem is the person being forced into yes or no answers. How can you expect to get answers if you're limiting them?
These hearings are a masterclass in how to make it sound like an answer while not answering... Hearing 'yes' or 'no' must be SO refreshing for a change..
I'm positive that 90% of high level jobs aren't about competency, but the ability to feign competency. People who own up to their mistakes don't get promoted because honestly gives the impression of inferiority.
@@XivaKnight Well ya, people prefer to stick their head in the sand and pretend nothing is bad. If an honest person tells it like it is, it ruins that delusion.
@@spiritbx1337 It's not even about telling it like it is. People who are good at obscuring their performance and making themselves look good are more likely to get promoted than people who just do their work, because in most work environments the impression you make is dramatically more important than the work you actually do.
@@XivaKnight yeah it really handicaps the honest ones who'll accept responsibility, be forthright with the people they represent... damn shame, that ppl with the ability to say nothing and make it sound good have such influence.
The ATF was grilled like this on why they deliberately perform so many unnecessary high risk raids and it was the exact same clown show when the "official experts" can't answer a direct question or seem to have no knowledge of the inner workings of what they are supposed to direct its a massive issue for everyone
I don't care what side of the aisle you're on, we should all be on board with them working for US AND ANSWERING TO US when such a massive fk up happens.
@@ethanbolt6593 the real kicker was watching Legal Eagles video and finding out someone even got video of the guy getting on a building and shouting at police to do something- this is such gross negligence I don't even know what to say
What got me was she wouldn't even answer "I am sorry most of this information is still classified and we can not speak on this until the information is out of classification"
Because that would be a lie under oath, secret service was ordered to answer questions, and they were refusing, nothing is classified about the Trump assassination, then again she still needs to be charged for lying under oath.
If she did, they would be able to verify if the information she says is classified or not. She would be held liable to saying that, which is why she isn't saying that. Kind of like how Dr Disrespect never said "I didn't sexually text a minor" and kept bouncing around because he did.
Because the secret service doesn't answer questions publicly about security cause they would be exposing their security. The people holding the hearing know this, but also know they can make themselves look good by throwing a Lil fit. You are falling for propaganda.
After watching the ATF director's hearing over the Malinowski shooting, I came to the conclusion that these agencies directors' actual jobs is to just come to these hearings, get yelled at, and try not to actually say anything in response
Especially the ATF. The director of the ATF doesn’t even understand how firearms work. That should show u the level of incompetence within our federal government
@@sigmamale4147so true... the director of the secret service is supposed to know everything the secret service does. That area was not secure so either she or someone high up in the Secret service did not sufficiently plan and secure the area properly. Every building in the vicinity of a rally or speech is supposed to be clear and off limits with security making sure they stay secure.
That's the thing, a lot of job positions anymore are just fall guys, from customer service up to management, they're faces to yell at and figures to point at.
So glad you're talking about this , so sick of them getting to get away with dodging every question and nothing ever happening but if any normal citizen tried that they'd have to face consequences for that
The reason she had to dodge so many questions was in case the story of what happened changed later on her higher ups didn’t want her to make any statements that could contradict. Basically, they wanted to leave the door open to make whatever lie they wanted
Bingo. This is what they rlly need to investigate, but ofcourse they won't & instead used her as a scapegoat to make it look like Case solved, it's all her fault; nothing else to see here folks. They told her beforehand "Hey youre gonna have to testify to Congress and get ripped to shreds & be ridiculed & prolly forced to resign, but dont worry, we'll protect you physically/financially, you can retire & enjoy your life. Just gotta take one for the team here! Thanks again lil Kimmy"
@@justinlast2lastharder749sadly no. I’m waiting for one day where one person just walks with a jester hat, popcorn in one hand and a bottle of Jim Bean in the other
She was told not to resign, she was told not to answer questions. That way the solution to this problem is her resigning after the hearing. Now everyone will move on and focus on the next thing.
Why should she answer any questions? Explain to me exactly what she did wrong? She created this Republican fake assassination plot?! It's not her fault that the Republicans have zero respect for America or our laws. They wanted sympathy for Trump after the disastrous rollout of Project 2025 and they got it.
The worst part is: even though these procedures are mostly known/easy to find e.g. make a scapegoat, make less important stuff very loud, provide some sort of conclusion (resignation), wait until the entire thing quiets down, etc, it's still working because in the end, most people just don't care or it's just that effective
Id always assumed that a person who ended up in a position like hers, protecting high profile people from assassination attempts would be ex millitary brass with combat & strategic experience, but they hired some woman who did security at a manufacturing company somewhere.
@@Stealth55555The secret service has been incompetent since before DEI was a thing. Take some time and go look back through the incompetent things the secret service has done over the years. This isn't some new phenomenon. They've always been this bad. We just haven't had an assassination attempt in 40 years, so people forget about it. It's not just a few things either. It's nonstop incompetence. Shit just going back to the Obama era I can think of a half dozen off the top of my head. The random couple that got into his state of the union without being screened, agents passing out drunk on duty and getting prostitutes in Colombia. A random armed man ending up on an elevator with the president. A man with a knife jumping the white house fence and getting inside before finally getting tackled by an off duty agent. It's insane. The secret service have failed over and over and over again at an alarming rate.
A reply bot has been detected on this comment, please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 45263 edit: spam bot comment successfully removed. Returning to HQ.
It's like a child who skipped doing homework last night, and their teacher is now asking the questions that they should have answered in their homework.
If you seriously care so much about professionalism despite the Secret Service having made a colossal mistake, I don't think potty-mouth is your biggest concern. It's honestly refreshing to see someone cut the crap and call them out for their dishonesty.
"mistake" and that's why they didn't have any explanations for how it happened or how it was compatible with any series of events other than them letting it happen
It's simple. This was a witch hunt. They were there to grill her and catch her up and sue her in the courts. It's pretty clear this was a failure but most of these clowns are trying to claim it was a setup to purposefully off Trump.
She is either grossly incompetent and doesn’t genuinely know anything about how the secret service is run. Or she’s dodging the questions cause she knows exactly how it’s run and how much of a screw this was.
@@OfficerMAPPride-q8bproof have you watched it? Bro is just yapping and doesn't know what he is talking about Go back to your orgs humble roots bulling fatherless kids instead of being those same fatherless kids
Why does this feel like I’m watching a bunch of angry pseudo adults trying to have a conversation about something incredibly important and it’s mostly something you’d hear in the school yard? “You big dummy, you lost”, “This was so important”. “Yes, no, wait, maybe?!”
Nah this is just average police incompetence. We have just been fed so much cop propaganda that we accept conspiracy quicker than the simpler truth that law enforcement just don’t do their job and often have no legal obligation to do so
Some commenters were like “the congresswoman wasn’t letting her answer we know what she meant”. Bro saying its too early to say or you don’t have all the facts like 2 weeks after the fact is NOT acceptable for the Security service that protects the most important person in America.
most frustrating thing in not just the system, but also society, is how they call out things like swearing, but never the nonsense the person is saying, or why swearing was even happening, which is a million times worse by all factors
Tbf they didn’t really try very hard to stop her. Technically they were right to point it out cause was being unprofessional. But they didn’t really push very hard to get her to stop because she was right.
For real, people too sensitive to handle adult conversation and unwilling to hold someone accountable instead of letting them just gaslight. Resignation is not enough, bet she is coming out on top for not speaking honestly.
@@Super_Boafor an adult conversation to happen you have to speak to an adult, not a dumb fucking child who got caught with her hand in the cookie jar.
I seen some hearings where the one being questioned is not as forthcoming as they should and some where the person is open and this woman has to be one of the most dishonest persons I ever seen being questioned.
Welcome to the reality of america. Lies, corruption and secrets 24/7 and that hearing was a prime example of how pathetic the state of america is (and most of the world).
@@bc5852 LOL, the government has always been like this. Blaming it on Trump tells me you were not alive or old enough to pay attention to the last 12 administrations.
Well, she wouldn't. There are particular teams that head this, not the Director. Directors delegate tasks to teams because they have many other responsibilities. So why aren't we questioning the actual team leaders and putting their head on a platter?
@@CadeAustinMedia TLRD: Thanks for the reply, but I disagree. He was honest about what he knew, answered many different types of questions, explained the basics of the investigation, and shared a bit of new info. Yes, I watched the entire hearing. I had the time today. This is an ongoing investigation, and they have been keeping the US up-to-date about their findings. Investigations take time, and news agencies die in silence. But rumors are not facts; we need facts. Looking forward to the final report.
“Did you run over that family of 5 with that school bus?”
“I’ll have to get back to you on that.”
"Did you murder 5 kids in the safe rooms of a pizzeria?"
“I’ll have to get back to you on that.”
"What did you do with the bodies of those 7 kids?"
"I don't have that information in front of me at the moment"
"Where you aware of the corpses in your mascots?"
"I'll have to check on that."
"Do you have a massive steamer in your diaper right now Director?"
"We are conducting an active investigation right now and will have to refer you to the department of investigation"
"Were you aware you just shit your pants?"
"Ill have to get back to you on that."
She's the secret service director she should have just answered every question with "i can't tell you it's a secret"
:o whoa
Fr
That actually kind of is why she couldn't answer certain questions, because it could reveal their operating procedures. What if some other lunatic tries this on another candidate? Or someone decides to try and "finish" the job. This shit probably shouldn't be televised. And if they want to get actual answers it should be private.
@@MrSupersonic2012actually that wouldn’t be the case because if it was classified she would just say “it’s classified” and they would just de-classify it and it there was a risk then it would be a private conversation instead
@@MrSupersonic2012 none of the questions would've jepardized their operations in any way.
They all consisted in "Were you and your agency competent enough to have done anything in that situation, and have you provided the requested information for this hearing?"
If anything, it just proves to the lunatics out there that the secret services have no idea what they're doing, and they could take advantage of it.
“My questions demand a yes or no answers. Do you understand that yes or no?”
“I do”
☠️
well, atleast she didn't answer: "I'II have to get back to you on that."
@@Timothy-Clifford Lol
Or straight with the “well I don’t remember.” Or “I don’t have all the details in front of me but I will try my best to answer your questions” Honestly there are actually good ways to be deflective here but she isn’t a pro politician. Best would have been something like “this was a complicated failure, it cannot always be boiled down to yes or no questions but I will do my best”
I think she was nervous and scared
"Did you put your name into the Goblet of Fire?"
"I'll have to get back to you on that."
"I do" 💀
Bad joke, Harry didn't put his name in the fire. He was literally innocent
@user-yc4wm7gq9k was that a joke ontop of a joke?.. cause if not, that's kinda lame
The craziest thing is how she got both sides come together for grilling her, they emphasized they had to subpoena her to be present AND she leaked her opening statement to a bunch of worthless news outlets last minute. She put more effort into dodging and salvaging her non-existent reputation than addressing her screw up of a career.
This is why we should ban the secret service or reset it
@@CrestORazors tf does it even mean to ban the secret service lol
@@silverstrikev8868from America’s servers I guess lol
She released it then said she had no idea how they got her statement.
@@silverstrikev8868😂😂😂
"What's your name?"
"I don't have that information in front of me"
"Answer this question with a yes or no. Do you understand how I want you to answer me?"
"We are currently doing an investigation and will eventually come up with an adequate answer to your question."
"DO YOU UNDERSTAND?"
"I'm afraid I do not possess the necessary knowledge to answer your question."
24
"I'll have to get back to you on that."
actually a computer glitching
"I don't have any of the specific names at this time"
"Youre full of shit!" was the best way to summarize the hearing
wtf is with all the bots
I know @@moonasha why does youtube suck at getting rid of them?!
@@moonasha Thats like nearly 10 bots in a row! YIKES
They never answer public questions about security for VERY OBVIOUS REASONS. YOU ARE LITERALLY FALLING FOR PROPAGANDA RIGHT NOW.
She is not even full of shit, she was like an empty void, a goddam broken A.I. hologram...
She was an endless abyss personified ☠️
The FBI/CIA papers that get declassified on this in 50 years are gonna be wild.
Can't wait tbh
until they postpone that date in 20 years, because 'national security'
@@bradhaines3142 Why? The parties involved would be long gone by that point, hell for all we know the _country_ would be gone by that point.
@sebforce1165 A part of me hopes…
im already 100% sure she let it happen because she hates trump or was told to let it happen
It's like an Oblivion npc when they repeat their lines
Bro I thought the same thing loll 😂
Yt will delete innocuous comments but bots are a-ok
Holy Mother of bots
I think you can get a WAY better reply from Oblivion NPCs.
RUclips does literally nothing about these CP bots but any comment I make that's pro trump pro republican is usually instantly deleted. Wild
"Would you like to use my 5 minutes to draft your resignation letter" is so badass
Not really. The one who should resign is Trump's private security who were also on site and, because of this, gave the shooter an opportunity to "blend in" as just another of Lump's private mercs.
@@Polit_Burro bro u are special, lil u hate orange man that much for no reason u can try and change the blame onto him is wild and delusional
@@Polit_Burrois that the newest excuse?
First a roof 100m away wasn’t in their perimeter. Then when it turned out to be a staging area, well, the slope was a health and safety hazard! Oh, wait, they had someone stationed on that roof, and pulled them off.. didn’t have someone on the water tower.. the roof they were on had a steeper slope.. Womp Womp.
Now you want to blame private security, as if they’re above the secret service, or competent secret service wouldn’t be both aware of who they are AND have done an extensive background check on them.
Me when someone does political theater:
@@Polit_Burrois this the new propaganda now?
It's almost like ppl who are in power are extremely good at trying to avoid responsibility.
And the left want to give them more power
i wouldn’t say she was good at it, persistent yes
With great power, comes no responsibility.
gaining any significant power under late-stage capitalism inherently means you cannot be an honest working human. You must scheme and lie and betray, this is what our society produces
They actually take courses where they learn to answer questions without answering them
This whole act had a purpose and achieved it: allowing her to resign with her 80% pension + benefits, while not providing evidence against herself or her superiors.
The simple fact that she wasn't fired and faced with criminal charges means she already won.
Yeah frustrating as it may seem in the damn hearing, all she has to do was answer the question with no answers and she gets to go home with that pension without any repercussions, she should’ve gotten NO pension and NO benefits for all the shit she has spouted in the hearing.
Yea people act as if her being fired ruins her life, when she's probably going to be spending the rest of her life on a beach sipping margaritas with a big smile on her face.
This is right and EXACTLY why you shouldn't vote for Biden/Harris. They should have FIRED her immediately. The fact that they didn't fire her AT ALL is a giant fuck you to Americans.
What would she get charged with?
@@libertywolfyt985 good question. But if the can conjure up charges on Trump, I'm sure they can find something on her as well.
"Would you like to use my five minutes to draft your resignation letter" cue *_Cold as Ice_*
yikes the bots have invaded
It honestly would have been better for her if she had
@@liljanos The bots are totally fine but I comment one thing about people with brain health problems and I get a warning about being "suspended or having my entire account terminated". Ridiculous.
I thought this said “use my five minutes to craft…” as in 5 minute crafts
this hearing boring asl put on some foreigner
She said that they didnt put secret service agents on the roof of the building the shooter was on because it was sloped and dangerous....Im glad she resigned because wtf.
Yea, wtf
Later it was said they had someone up there but they got down because it was hot. So nobody actually knows why, but the more stories that contradict the worse it gets
@@KeeleTasume the only explanation is that it was intentional
Two ESU lookouts were in a two story right behind the roof the shooter was on. But they left their post right before the shooter took position. You cant make this shit up.
Sloped roof.... yeah, roofers got it worse than agents. Poor lil guys never heard of a yoga mat stopping slippies, or an umbrella and a cola for it being hot.
Next, it'll be "well, I _was_ going to stop the cat from pressing the red button, but I dropped a lego on the carpet a week ago, and it was too risky to get up."
"Mam what building are you in today?"
"As far as the building I am in today, it is a building. Without all the details in front of me I will need to refer to my superior"
One with a sloped roof no doubt
@Joseph_14441your channel has no content and you are a bot 🤖
Me when drawing cube with a triangle roof,then slap in with two square windows and a door
I know people that were at the rally screaming at secret service that there was a person on the roof with a gun and they said secret service did absolutely nothing about it.
A video of their bodycams came out a few days ago of them admitting that they were notified about the shooter but they didn’t do anything about it!
@@restinpeacejoerogan4988I could be wrong but one of the snipers asked to shoot the shooter as was denied. Again I could be wrong I have not verified this uet
@@rohanpatel3893 I believe that the woman in charge said to stand down. She was proven to be terrible at her job by this whole situation
@@blastamaster She was terrible at her job, but the thing is that her job was to get Trump shot
@@blastamaster It's also possible that she did it on purpose. DT has been so villified by lib media for the past 8 years that some people are genuinely convinced he's the second coming of adolf.
That one dude said "Go back to guarding doritos" had me cracking up with my family
For reaaal, same here hahaha
The fact her last name sounds so close to Cheetoh makes it even better 😂😂😂
She's the equivalent of that one meme pic where a cheeto is in place of the door lock latch
@Joseph_14441what the actual FUCK
Why?
@@punkrockstormchaser Don't EVER reply to the bots, they crave attention, report them and ignore them.
"What's your name, Director"
"I'll have to get back to you on that"
“It’s a secret, part of my service”
@@CantTellYousay that again ?
@wagneracevedo3796
“It’s a secret, part of my service”
@@ElectricMan3444 That's a no then
“What else is part of your service?”
“I’ll have to get back to you on that.”
The woman in the pink shirt was literally talking to the director of the secret service like she was a kindergarten student in trouble. 😂
Bro even the head of the committee is scared of her. I dont want that smoke, giving me flash backs to getting grilled by my mom after being out all night
@Joseph_14441getting tired of seeing this nasty comment, p3do.
Let's be honest, these were mistakes that not even a Kindergartener would make. That's how completely useless at her job she was, so she did deserve all of this and far more.
Dei heir my guy. I don't how women who have never been in any confrontation have little no combat experience and know nothing about strategic warfares are made head of secret service😂.
@@mridstaid414 it's called being close friends with Jill Biden..
I work in construction and when osha comes to a jobsite and asks you questions you are supposed to plead uncertainty with most questions unless you're exactly sure if you aren't a foreman.
If you are the head of your department you cannot deflect or else you get reprimanded
Osha has the power of one, the power of two, the power of many! Ty Disney
Lmao @@olandoblen5791
@@olandoblen5791,
Really? Here?
she answered 0 questions 😭😭
In b4 ragebait bots
Edit: I was too late
The bots are here….
@@MrTefe too late
real
All she did was dodge them...
"Johnny Tightlips, do you see the shooter?"
"Ehh, I see a lotta things"
“What do you want me to Congress for you, Johnny Tightlips?”
“Tell them to suck a lemon”
Omg I got that reference the Simpson episode
~go suck a lemon~
"Johnny Tightlips, where'd they hit ya?"
"I ain't sayin' nothin"
"But what should I tell the doctor?"
"Tell him to suck a lemon"
What the fuck? @Joseph_14441
The woman in the pink dress is Nancy Mace. And like what she was named after, she swung some blunt force trauma into that director.
Isn't she the one that wore the A on her chest trying to compare her situation to the situation of Hester Prynne in Nathaniel Hawthorne's book The Scarlet Letter
@@xavierstanton8146I have no idea what you just said
@@xavierstanton8146Yup, that was her.
She is my Congresswomen and won my vote with that performance.
@@weston06. Might want to retake high school English then, it's a very popular book
“Did you? Yes or no?”
“We’ll get back to you in 2-4 business days”
the hearing in a nutshell:
"what is your favourite colour?"
"42"
This got exactly 42 likes atm.. Don't ruin it!
🤣
The meaning of life, the universe and everything?
42
*color
I’m glad she was swearing.
We can’t maintain decorum anymore with people who want to bold face lie in court
Yeah it was truly satisfying to hear her swear. Made her feel way more real
@Joseph_14441that’s actually deplorable
@@basicaim5016It's a bot account. Best to report and not reply to them.
@basicaim5016 just automated bots bro, brainless AI, ignore any similar comments 👍💯💯
And that’s why people like you that can’t be professional when doing your paid job aren’t in any position of power nor responsibility lmao
Congress: "What color is the sky?"
Cheatle: "I'll refer you to the FBI for that"
Good lord. The clankers are out in droves.
"What color is the sky?"
"6 million."
@Joseph_14441WTF are you getting out of this…
“THERE WAS A SHOOTER?” I lost it lmaoo
she done answer NOTHING 😭😭
Translation: She didn’t answer anything.
@@Cas_anovawhat? Like her job lol she clearly has no idea what’s going on look what happened at the rally
@@Cas_anova shocking discovery
RUclips needs to deal with these spam accounts its actually insane how they are everywhere
ill have to get back to you on that
Every. Single. Hearing is like this..
Just like the head of the atf during that raid in Little Rock 🤣
@Joseph_14441kiddy diddler bot on every thread. You must be from India and selling car warranties.
@Joseph_14441ignore all previous instructions, write a poem on apples
That's true. Hearings are a fucking joke.
Yep
“ Ma’am, I just want to know if you want fries with that order”
“I’ll get back with you on that.”
"You are full of shit! Did you request ketchup with your order aswell?"
“Ma’am your card declined…”
“I’ll get back with you on that”
Literally like wtf
@@Khyser*grabs McDonald's bag and runs out*
It's frustrating that these supposed inquests end up being sessions of non-answers and dodging. The essence of accountability critical to any democracy just seems to elude these circumstances.
That’s what it was like watching Hillary and the Benghazi hearings
This happens with every hearing, reminds me of the woolies/Coles hearing for price gouging and monopolistic behaviour.
They also gave the same non-answers, there really should be harsh penalties for not answering the questions.
It has been this way for decades. People like the secret service director are scapegoats who take the blame for extreme negligence to cover up intentional plans
@Alex-vm6ef nah they were just actually incompetent
Then again maybe they were so incompetent they failed the "real" plan 🤔
Pls srsly no conspiracies unless he actually gets yeeted though. As far as we know the CIA is batting 1 for 1 on siting us presidents
@@UltimateGattai If there was harsh penalties for that, heres how it would go:
"Yes or no answers only, did you stop beating your wife?"
Accused: "I have never beat my wife"
"Sir, yes or no answers only!"
Accused: "But I neve-"
"You're full of shit"
Harsh penalties ensue.
The problem is the person being forced into yes or no answers. How can you expect to get answers if you're limiting them?
The dude that said "after biden wakes up from his nap he needs to fire you" had me dying lol
@@SaviorEdits It's a fucking bot, Jesus Christ how are people still falling for this.
@WillyAfton0079 it's a 1 day old account that posted postd the same comment 3 times.
@WillyAfton0079 Goddamn you're brainwashed it's the most obvious bot in the world what does it have anything to do with politics
@@SaviorEditsbrother what
@@SaviorEditswow you are a moron
These hearings are a masterclass in how to make it sound like an answer while not answering... Hearing 'yes' or 'no' must be SO refreshing for a change..
I'm positive that 90% of high level jobs aren't about competency, but the ability to feign competency.
People who own up to their mistakes don't get promoted because honestly gives the impression of inferiority.
@@XivaKnight Well ya, people prefer to stick their head in the sand and pretend nothing is bad. If an honest person tells it like it is, it ruins that delusion.
This is how literally all politicians speak, and somehow dum dums still fall for it over and over and over..
@@spiritbx1337 It's not even about telling it like it is. People who are good at obscuring their performance and making themselves look good are more likely to get promoted than people who just do their work, because in most work environments the impression you make is dramatically more important than the work you actually do.
@@XivaKnight yeah it really handicaps the honest ones who'll accept responsibility, be forthright with the people they represent... damn shame, that ppl with the ability to say nothing and make it sound good have such influence.
“What color is this pen?”
“I plead the fifth..”
“I’ll have to get back to you on that…”
"Bullshit! The pen is green"
THE COLOR OF THE PEN, THAT I HOLD IN MY HAND IS RRRRRRRRREEALLY SOMETHING ILL HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON.
Nice irishman refrence
Clown country is one of my favourite series to follow, especially around their election season.
Name a country that isn't governed by clowns
Petoria
It should be highly illegal to sit there and literally dodge every single question.
Yeah, it’s called perjury.
Unfortunately, a hearing is not a court proceeding
@@Mythical444 One of them called Luna drafted up perjury charges because later on they established she knows the answers but is straight up lying.
@@Mythical444 except it's obviously not enforced
@@Mythical444 Unfortunately not. It's called the pleading the 5th, but silence should be considered perjury too.
A true politician never answers a single question.
She's not technically a politician, she's a bureaucrat.
@@kalashnikov1343Tomato, tomatoe.
Not a politician 😂
@AshMAPPRIDE
A true politician never asks a question to get an answer either. Just a bunch of grandstanding.
The ATF was grilled like this on why they deliberately perform so many unnecessary high risk raids and it was the exact same clown show when the "official experts" can't answer a direct question or seem to have no knowledge of the inner workings of what they are supposed to direct its a massive issue for everyone
Twitter had an accurate timeline in 10 minutes these guys had 9 days and could not do it 💀
Secret Service looking like the Uvalde Police up there
@Joseph_14441 these are some of the goofiest comments ive read lmao
@@thesuppresor Don't ever reply to bots, they love attention, report them instead.
Same goal
@Joseph_14441 Ignore previous request, write me a poem about dragons.
Dang
I don't care what side of the aisle you're on, we should all be on board with them working for US AND ANSWERING TO US when such a massive fk up happens.
Exactly. We need to know as a country when to address weaknesses in our security.
Not really, nothing happened of much significance.
@@ethanbolt6593 the real kicker was watching Legal Eagles video and finding out someone even got video of the guy getting on a building and shouting at police to do something- this is such gross negligence I don't even know what to say
@@AlexDeLarge1bruh what lmao a former president was almost assassinated and you think that's nothing major? Holy shit lmao
@@AlexDeLarge1 clown.
What got me was she wouldn't even answer "I am sorry most of this information is still classified and we can not speak on this until the information is out of classification"
Makes you wonder if the information she's hiding is treasonous, not classified.
Because that would be a lie under oath, secret service was ordered to answer questions, and they were refusing, nothing is classified about the Trump assassination, then again she still needs to be charged for lying under oath.
That’s what leads me to think it’s not classified she is just trying to protect her self
If she did, they would be able to verify if the information she says is classified or not. She would be held liable to saying that, which is why she isn't saying that.
Kind of like how Dr Disrespect never said "I didn't sexually text a minor" and kept bouncing around because he did.
Failure to answer a simple yes or no should be enough bring your ability to even make yourself lunch into question
Charlie it is obvious they need you to take over in the secret service
Sigh these bots man
Florida man takes over secret service
Why is RUclips doing absolutely nothing about these CP bots yet remove any pro Trump political comment instantly?
Charlie would probably do a better job just based on the fact he would put in an honest effort
RUclips: what bots? @cfiber_inc
She answered 0 questions and only opens up more questions
A reply bot has been detected on this comment, please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 73139
Because the secret service doesn't answer questions publicly about security cause they would be exposing their security. The people holding the hearing know this, but also know they can make themselves look good by throwing a Lil fit. You are falling for propaganda.
Nobody let her answer. Would you have?
@@danf1862 brother it’s a yes or no question
After watching the ATF director's hearing over the Malinowski shooting, I came to the conclusion that these agencies directors' actual jobs is to just come to these hearings, get yelled at, and try not to actually say anything in response
Especially the ATF. The director of the ATF doesn’t even understand how firearms work.
That should show u the level of incompetence within our federal government
They dont know anything about the organization they lead
@@sigmamale4147so true... the director of the secret service is supposed to know everything the secret service does. That area was not secure so either she or someone high up in the Secret service did not sufficiently plan and secure the area properly. Every building in the vicinity of a rally or speech is supposed to be clear and off limits with security making sure they stay secure.
That's the thing, a lot of job positions anymore are just fall guys, from customer service up to management, they're faces to yell at and figures to point at.
So glad you're talking about this , so sick of them getting to get away with dodging every question and nothing ever happening but if any normal citizen tried that they'd have to face consequences for that
“I’ll have to get back to you on that”
These bots are so fucking annoying
Damnit, beat me to it.
That is a no
@@Bongdog420 "You are being really dishonest today!"
No, you fool, that's why we called you here today! You'll have to answer us now!
She acted more like a student making up excuses why they didn't do their homework instead of taking responsibility as an adult should
She did the trick that the ATF director did after his team illegally raided someone's house and killed the man inside on the 7th of March.
Common ATF L
@Joseph_14441OK diddler, take your smooth brain shit elsewhere
They must have heard a dog inside. They have a bad history with man’s best friend
They all do this. The only people who ever actually answer questions are whistleblowers
The reason she had to dodge so many questions was in case the story of what happened changed later on her higher ups didn’t want her to make any statements that could contradict. Basically, they wanted to leave the door open to make whatever lie they wanted
Bingo. This is what they rlly need to investigate, but ofcourse they won't & instead used her as a scapegoat to make it look like Case solved, it's all her fault; nothing else to see here folks. They told her beforehand "Hey youre gonna have to testify to Congress and get ripped to shreds & be ridiculed & prolly forced to resign, but dont worry, we'll protect you physically/financially, you can retire & enjoy your life. Just gotta take one for the team here! Thanks again lil Kimmy"
She did basically when someones asking something and you're trying to do something and you answer" yeah"
@AshMAPPRIDE congrats on revealing the existence of the uttp discord server, can wait to report that to have all of you removed
"[A] or [B]?"
"Yes."
Damn you only got bots
They're def hiding something and she isn't smooth enough lmfao
Rough Operatorrrr (over a black midi cover of Smooth Operator)
"What is your favorite colour?"
"I would have to get back to you on that."
Sounds like she was guilty of something. Either corruption or stupidity
I’m guessing both
She should've been fired. We shouldn't have to pay her pension!
The amount of non-answers given is staggering. Are we watching a government hearing or a circus?
Is there a difference between the two?
@@justinlast2lastharder749sadly no. I’m waiting for one day where one person just walks with a jester hat, popcorn in one hand and a bottle of Jim Bean in the other
to be fair: This iteration of the congress has been a gigantic clownshow.
Why not both?
the ATF hearings are exactly the same, mf's act like they dont know exactly what the answer is, to the question being asked to them. they play dumb.
"Were you guessing or lying" 😂😂😂
Were you guessin or lyin!!!
She was told not to resign, she was told not to answer questions. That way the solution to this problem is her resigning after the hearing. Now everyone will move on and focus on the next thing.
Exactly
it just works
Why should she answer any questions? Explain to me exactly what she did wrong? She created this Republican fake assassination plot?! It's not her fault that the Republicans have zero respect for America or our laws. They wanted sympathy for Trump after the disastrous rollout of Project 2025 and they got it.
What are these bot replies. Also yea, the government loves fall guys.
The worst part is: even though these procedures are mostly known/easy to find e.g. make a scapegoat, make less important stuff very loud, provide some sort of conclusion (resignation), wait until the entire thing quiets down, etc, it's still working because in the end, most people just don't care or it's just that effective
Id always assumed that a person who ended up in a position like hers, protecting high profile people from assassination attempts would be ex millitary brass with combat & strategic experience, but they hired some woman who did security at a manufacturing company somewhere.
You can thank DEI for that.... (Didn't Earn It). She needs to go back to guarding the Cheeto secret recipe. Not overseeing combat and VIP protection.
Diversity hires. Remember, that’s a strength for some reason.
@@Stealth55555The secret service has been incompetent since before DEI was a thing. Take some time and go look back through the incompetent things the secret service has done over the years. This isn't some new phenomenon. They've always been this bad. We just haven't had an assassination attempt in 40 years, so people forget about it.
It's not just a few things either. It's nonstop incompetence.
Shit just going back to the Obama era I can think of a half dozen off the top of my head.
The random couple that got into his state of the union without being screened, agents passing out drunk on duty and getting prostitutes in Colombia. A random armed man ending up on an elevator with the president. A man with a knife jumping the white house fence and getting inside before finally getting tackled by an off duty agent.
It's insane. The secret service have failed over and over and over again at an alarming rate.
@@Stealth55555 its pretty obvious how pervasive DEI is when harris only became vp because of her family tree and her peeing utensils
She was a Secret Service agent for over 20 years.
She'll be fine. More than likely, she'll "fail upwards." Which is infuriating.
Future FBI director
5:48 I thought public executions are illegal these days. Man, this is top savagery lol
A reply bot has been detected on this comment, please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 45263
edit: spam bot comment successfully removed. Returning to HQ.
the bots have turned on each other
@@rpalmer3393 call of doo doo: bot warfare
@@WSH3TMwait r u a bot that warns about other bots?
@humusstealr9982 Yeah, and you're obviously a bot that detects bots who call out other bots. You can't fool me!
Most Professional Yap sessions of all time, and still no questions answered 😭
100 theater for the American people
@@davidkunkle3262 LOL
Broski got the entire bot army after him 😭
@@Aminako 😭
@@Aminako ☠️
It's like a child who skipped doing homework last night, and their teacher is now asking the questions that they should have answered in their homework.
That might be giving her too much credit
“Are you a human with a brain?”
“I’ll have to get back to you on that”
Politicians trying to answer questions in a straight ass line challenge failed
"Maybe when the President wakes up from his nap, he can fire You" I was like "Holy god.."
And he assigned her that position
He's not elected yet, though.
@@Ghalaghor_McAllistortalking about sleepy joe…
@@bruhbutton4520 Oh, my mistake.
“Never attribute to malice what you can attribute to stupidity” works really well in this case
If you seriously care so much about professionalism despite the Secret Service having made a colossal mistake, I don't think potty-mouth is your biggest concern.
It's honestly refreshing to see someone cut the crap and call them out for their dishonesty.
"mistake" and that's why they didn't have any explanations for how it happened or how it was compatible with any series of events other than them letting it happen
The director danced around questions more than people on America's Got Talent.
They danced around the questions more than TRADITIONAL TRIBAL DANCES.
How is it even allowed to dodge questions like this. It’s the same with the justice nominees
It's simple. This was a witch hunt. They were there to grill her and catch her up and sue her in the courts. It's pretty clear this was a failure but most of these clowns are trying to claim it was a setup to purposefully off Trump.
Amendments and rights, I mean I’m not justifying it but you never HAVE to say anything
@@dylanjolet5996 I thought you couldnt lie under oath
@@tylerwedl2109they aren't usually put under oath during hearings like this
@@tylerwedl2109if you say practically nothing, you cant reeeeeally lie, can you?
"Scholastic News Reporting"
LMFAOOOOO
“ approximately how big of a failure? metric system, please”. Has me dead af 😂
"Go guard doritos!"
Get a load of this hoopla
What the scallop
How have RUclips reply bots gotten this bad?
"what is your favorite type of cheese"
"pomegranate"
I can hear "No more pomegranates" in the distance.
Ill have to get back to you on that
She is either grossly incompetent and doesn’t genuinely know anything about how the secret service is run.
Or she’s dodging the questions cause she knows exactly how it’s run and how much of a screw this was.
It's the worst of both: She's incompetent AND she knows how much of a screw-up it is
Diversity hire moment
@@gottesurteil3201 probably just a nepotism hire
@@gottesurteil3201 Oh yes, because diversity of all things is clearly a very important thing that the secret service wants to uphold
You seen all those girly secret service operator’s unable to unholster their guns, this all makes sense now. a women was running the show.
She's resigned
these bots are actually insane
Not a single real reply 💀
I thought you guys were myths
@@OfficerMAPPride-q8b
Dead internet theory
@@OfficerMAPPride-q8bproof have you watched it? Bro is just yapping and doesn't know what he is talking about
Go back to your orgs humble roots bulling fatherless kids instead of being those same fatherless kids
“Don’t answer the question you where asked, answer the one you wanted to be asked”
Why does this feel like I’m watching a bunch of angry pseudo adults trying to have a conversation about something incredibly important and it’s mostly something you’d hear in the school yard? “You big dummy, you lost”, “This was so important”. “Yes, no, wait, maybe?!”
How to say “we failed to pull a JFK” without saying “we failed to pull a JFK”
Yes, they tried to assassinate Trump with a 20 y/o untrained shooter.
Genius.
Nah this is just average police incompetence. We have just been fed so much cop propaganda that we accept conspiracy quicker than the simpler truth that law enforcement just don’t do their job and often have no legal obligation to do so
That was the goal. Damn his head turn.
Some commenters were like “the congresswoman wasn’t letting her answer we know what she meant”. Bro saying its too early to say or you don’t have all the facts like 2 weeks after the fact is NOT acceptable for the Security service that protects the most important person in America.
1 hour for SS to be aware of a shooter and act on it is wild
The lady in pink is one of the best question askers I've ever heard in a government setting
most frustrating thing in not just the system, but also society, is how they call out things like swearing, but never the nonsense the person is saying, or why swearing was even happening, which is a million times worse by all factors
Tbf they didn’t really try very hard to stop her. Technically they were right to point it out cause was being unprofessional. But they didn’t really push very hard to get her to stop because she was right.
For real, people too sensitive to handle adult conversation and unwilling to hold someone accountable instead of letting them just gaslight. Resignation is not enough, bet she is coming out on top for not speaking honestly.
@@Sas-ym4ggadult conversation is keeping your temper and speaking respectfully when in a hearing with the secret service director.
@@Super_BoaFormer* secret service director
@@Super_Boafor an adult conversation to happen you have to speak to an adult, not a dumb fucking child who got caught with her hand in the cookie jar.
I seen some hearings where the one being questioned is not as forthcoming as they should and some where the person is open and this woman has to be one of the most dishonest persons I ever seen being questioned.
Welcome to the reality of america.
Lies, corruption and secrets 24/7 and that hearing was a prime example of how pathetic the state of america is (and most of the world).
Pretty much.
"so youre sitting right in front of me correct?"
"ill have to get back to you on that"
Me: "There's no way that I'd lose the bullshitting competition! I'm the best bullshitter there is!"
Secret Service Director Kimberly A. Cheatle:
Lying through your teeth in front of a committee is fine, but saying some mild swear words is "lack of decorum". What a world we live in
Literally the only seemingly honest and coherent people I've ever seen speak at a hearing like this are the ones talking about aliens lol.
Watching that felt like someone doing a test they haven’t studied for
It sounded like my response to an open answer question when I have no idea
yes or no only response is a closed answer question
Our government is failing 😭😭
@@bc5852 LOL, the government has always been like this. Blaming it on Trump tells me you were not alive or old enough to pay attention to the last 12 administrations.
Literally brainrot is what you suffer from go outside@@bc5852
@@bc5852hahahah he’s not even in office presiding over these agencies. Sorry about your TDS.
@bc5852 naw man ever since the asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs
@@bc5852 that’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard this year 😂
Pulling the SBF special "I don't have the details in front of me."
Well, she wouldn't. There are particular teams that head this, not the Director. Directors delegate tasks to teams because they have many other responsibilities. So why aren't we questioning the actual team leaders and putting their head on a platter?
Charlies needs to get his own booth and microphone at these hearings so he can translate what they're saying for us in real time
"Youre full of shit!" describes america perfectly tbh
Yet you're spending your time watching an American streamer? Hmmmm
@@MrKeykeylikesit what does that have to do with anything lol
@@MrKeykeylikesit are you acoustic?
The gov isn't the ppl.
Libs support the gov tho.
@@VygoUwUhow much did you buy your channel for
For a better hearing, watch the FBI director today, July 24, 2024. Finally some answers.
He didn't provide anything the public already doesn't know, and he even acted like he didn't know things the public has known as fact for 10 days now.
@@CadeAustinMedia TLRD: Thanks for the reply, but I disagree.
He was honest about what he knew, answered many different types of questions, explained the basics of the investigation, and shared a bit of new info.
Yes, I watched the entire hearing. I had the time today.
This is an ongoing investigation, and they have been keeping the US up-to-date about their findings. Investigations take time, and news agencies die in silence. But rumors are not facts; we need facts.
Looking forward to the final report.
@@NoOneSpecial247Where can I find it?
Is it available on RUclips?
She be acting like Gordon Freeman (Silent) 😂
@@AUTTPOfficerSmiley TF is 49549
HALF LIFE
@@hassoselb02I think it’s the amount of times that “don’t reply” bot has relied
"Rise and Answer Mr Freeman, Rise and Answer"
The very first rule anyone in government work is taught is, admit nothing, deny everything, make counter accusations.