THE MEG 2: THE TRENCH (How to Ruin a Franchise) EXPLORED

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 1,1 тыс.

  • @SebastienGendron-uk4po
    @SebastienGendron-uk4po Год назад +962

    what always bugged me about these shark movies was that the directors make the sharks out to be these gigantic creatures (which require a ton of food to sustain themselves) but are always chasing tiny prey (usually the protagonist, individual people instead of crowds of people). The first Jaws movie had great execution when it came to suspense and despite all the bloodshed and death, the shark never came off as evil.

    • @adequate673
      @adequate673 Год назад

      are you seriously expecting realism out of one of these stupid shark movies? There’s no way you are this slow

    • @williamreffett5862
      @williamreffett5862 Год назад +11

      Never seen a basking shark or humpback whale. Or any of the other krill eaters?

    • @zzodysseuszz
      @zzodysseuszz Год назад +77

      @@williamreffett5862 they eat fucking GIANT clouds of krill and plankton. Sharks eat fish. Fish that are proportionate to its body size. And they always eat enough to be proportionate to its body weight. The Meg never eats anything even remotely close to its body weight or size

    • @williamreffett5862
      @williamreffett5862 Год назад +4

      @@zzodysseuszz Have you ever seen a hammerhead shark they eat crustaceans

    • @uria3679
      @uria3679 Год назад

      Who here believes once WW3 happens, movie quality will increase because Hollywood will no longer be able to rely on countries like China

  • @haroldthaf
    @haroldthaf Год назад +430

    You gotta praise Statham for accepting every script that lands in his overall vicinity.

    • @RiverSiege
      @RiverSiege Год назад +50

      You assume Statham ever backs down from a challenge.

    • @ln.temperr5157
      @ln.temperr5157 Год назад +6

      Going for ole cages title

    • @ODST626
      @ODST626 Год назад +12

      Yis. Ironically I love his movies.
      Like. He plays his characters well and is an enjoyable actor to watch.
      Plus I love B and C movies. They're so campy and funny

    • @hamgobbler9160
      @hamgobbler9160 Год назад +1

      ​​@@ODST626remember Crank, and the even more absurd crank 2, i love them deeply, just for being so fucking goofy and off the deep end

    • @stemill1569
      @stemill1569 Год назад +3

      He really is a reason to watch the movie.

  • @iceheart1289
    @iceheart1289 Год назад +332

    I didn't see this movie, but if you tell me it ends with Jason Statham driving an exploding car through the shark, I'll believe you.

    • @DH-.
      @DH-. Год назад +2

      Now I'll expect to see this in the movie

    • @realname4430
      @realname4430 Год назад +4

      No, but he *does* use the blade of a crashed helicopter as a spear to skewer the megladon through the brain.

    • @sentientmustache8360
      @sentientmustache8360 Год назад +4

      @@realname4430HOW THE HELL DID HE USE IT? THOSE THINGS ARE HUGE! DID HE BUY A JAEGER OR WHAT?

    • @everythingisland3170
      @everythingisland3170 Год назад +3

      @@sentientmustache8360 He just pick the mf up. This movie is just dumb popcorn entertainment. I didn’t see the first one, but this video is telling me the first one was better.

    • @sentientmustache8360
      @sentientmustache8360 Год назад +1

      @@everythingisland3170 oh. Oh my god

  • @Tainted_Human
    @Tainted_Human Год назад +536

    I'll never get over how hilarious it is that Jason went on an interview throwing shade at Marvel CGI then went on to fight a CGI prehistoric shark.

    • @spencers4121
      @spencers4121 Год назад +47

      Some of the CGI in the marvel movies can be pretty meh to bad, the first Black Panther being a big one. I saw the first Meg, I don't recall the cgi looking bad yet to see the 2nd one.

    • @Tainted_Human
      @Tainted_Human Год назад +26

      @@spencers4121 it wasn't about being bad. It was about it being used. Yet he's in 2 movies about CGI sharks

    • @blackblurable
      @blackblurable Год назад +20

      oh the irony. He's probably salty that he didn't get an offer to be in one of their movies lol

    • @KingDingDong69
      @KingDingDong69 Год назад +19

      @@blackblurablemcu is garbage rn and wasn’t any better than good before endgame🙄

    • @187mrsmith
      @187mrsmith Год назад +21

      @@Tainted_Human this is why you got to stop mistaken celebrities and athletes as people of importance when they're really not

  • @pat2430
    @pat2430 Год назад +850

    Meg 2 is like sharknado. It embraced its awfulness and trying to outdo itself.

    • @SwiftyEmpire
      @SwiftyEmpire Год назад +59

      And for that, i love it

    • @obscureoccultist9158
      @obscureoccultist9158 Год назад +32

      You know you gotta respect them for taking their cheese and running as far as they can with it

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +24

      ​@@obscureoccultist9158when the source material is the exact opposite, yeah no

    • @uria3679
      @uria3679 Год назад

      Who here believes once WW3 happens, movie quality will increase because Hollywood will no longer be able to rely on countries like China

    • @animezilla4486
      @animezilla4486 Год назад +9

      ​@@damonlongstreet8630I disagree

  • @brytonup1551
    @brytonup1551 Год назад +1241

    The fact there is NO BLOOD in a shark movie is insane

    • @BeyondDaX
      @BeyondDaX Год назад +134

      This is but a single guess, but the lack of blood is a small indication that they are ensuring that will sell well in more foriegn markets. Especially china.

    • @deeya
      @deeya Год назад +37

      IKR?! Especially that mouth-cam scene, WTF! What a waste...

    • @ronald8664
      @ronald8664 Год назад

      It was clearly pandering to China and you know how much they censor media over there

    • @uria3679
      @uria3679 Год назад +12

      @@BeyondDaXglad that someone noticed it

    • @kcx1588x
      @kcx1588x Год назад +14

      Funny when something swallows a idiot whole, there's supposed to be BLOOD??

  • @Novikous
    @Novikous Год назад +217

    This movie has a bad case of Idiot Ball. When a character holds the idiot ball, it causes irrational behavior for plot contrivence. The ball can be passed from character to character regardless of distance and time.

    • @alexmartin3143
      @alexmartin3143 Год назад +16

      I been carrying an idiot ball my whole life…

    • @Hawk7886
      @Hawk7886 Год назад +9

      The idiot ball is basically my security blanket.

    • @Slop_Dogg
      @Slop_Dogg Год назад +6

      That’s fine, it’s already deeply stupid on a conceptual level

    • @ContactsNfilters
      @ContactsNfilters Год назад +1

      Lord of the Megs. I have the ball! It's my turn to act.

  • @riotbreaker3506
    @riotbreaker3506 Год назад +526

    My biggest red flag was seeing a Megalodon eat a Tyrannosaur, two animals that existed 63 Million Years apart. Might as well have had the T. rex eat a Polar Bear.
    Realistically, a Megalodon would be pretty tame, as most sharks are today, I'd be much more terrified of Livyatan, the killer whale that hunted Megs. The fact that they weren't used here is a travesty.

    • @spencers4121
      @spencers4121 Год назад +53

      Got to save something for meg 3.

    • @CelesteSinger1
      @CelesteSinger1 Год назад +72

      That scene was taken from the book, and it’s actually part of Jonas’ presentation. In the next chapter the next scene literally starts with Jonas saying how megalodon and T. rex didn’t exist at the same time

    • @Prehistoryanim
      @Prehistoryanim Год назад

      So you went into the theater and wanted to see realistic shit when you are about to watch a sci-fi action movie? The excuse you have for this being a shitty movie is a shitty excuse in itself.

    • @ashrog82
      @ashrog82 Год назад +23

      Took me a minute to realize you meant "a whale that is a killer", not "an orca".

    • @SonamSlash
      @SonamSlash Год назад +21

      Well, they didn’t hunt megs. They more so competed with megs since they both fed on smaller whales

  • @TheInfinityzeN
    @TheInfinityzeN Год назад +117

    One thing he didn't comment on is the stupidity of mining rare-earth elements from the bottom of the trench. Despite their name, they are fairly abundant and the term 'rare-earth' is a misnomer because they are not actually scarce. Their value comes from the difficultly of extracting them from ores that contain them. So building a mine for something that is found almost everywhere on the planet in an extremely hostile environment which would make the difficult extraction process almost impossible makes no sense.

    • @neo-filthyfrank1347
      @neo-filthyfrank1347 Год назад +3

      That seems like a dumb thing to whine about in a movie like this

    • @paul-juniorblack6151
      @paul-juniorblack6151 Год назад

      I mean kinda, except the mining pushes the plot. Them blowing up the Trench allow the Megs to come through the Thermoclyne so if it is truly as unneccessary as this guy says then its dumb. @@neo-filthyfrank1347

  • @mirakil7636
    @mirakil7636 Год назад +77

    I really rather enjoyed the movie, but I went in not expecting anything beyond "giant shark action movie 2: electric boogaloo". It filled my expectations quite well.

  • @chalk-one
    @chalk-one Год назад +50

    Statham killing the shark with the propeller reminded me of the crocodile death in the Australian film "Rogue". It's essentially the same killing method, shot quite similarly too.

  • @cretaceouscrusader661
    @cretaceouscrusader661 Год назад +78

    The age old question of: "Why is there a vent/gate/door that is big enough for the creature you are trying to contain to escape from in its enclosure?"
    - Why not have a bunch of smaller vents to allow water circulation instead of one big Megalodon sized vent.

    • @LightofJoshua
      @LightofJoshua Год назад +8

      Was thinking the same thing

    • @kyleellis1825
      @kyleellis1825 Год назад +5

      Is the door to a tiger cage/zoo enclosure too small for it to get out of?

    • @cretaceouscrusader661
      @cretaceouscrusader661 Год назад +4

      @@kyleellis1825 was thinking more along the lines of monster movies, but point taken.

    • @Emmet-id6xq
      @Emmet-id6xq Год назад +4

      When this scene was happening I kept thinking's don't do free Willie's jump over the enclosure wall

    • @turk3sh
      @turk3sh 6 месяцев назад

      @@Emmet-id6xqwas thinking the same lmao

  • @jojetparedes4024
    @jojetparedes4024 Год назад +29

    "Allergic to good decision making..." that just made my day...

  • @locomotivetrain3797
    @locomotivetrain3797 Год назад +111

    The thing that confused me the most was how Jonas the environmentalist had no issue killing a rare species that they know they co-exist with I was so confused how they humanized a giant monster just to murder the species later on

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +7

      In the book only 1 has even been killed by a human, other Megs, Lios, Orcas are another story

    • @donovanbradford8231
      @donovanbradford8231 Год назад +3

      Listening to this I'm wondering how much of this film was written by actual writers and how much was crafted by AI because while I haven't seen this it sounds all over the place having plot elements that not only seem out of place but fit better into other types of films. I don't know if this was too many cooks in the kitchen or having one or two people come in to fix a badly written script done up by a computer because this story doesn't make any sense.

    • @Ebi.Adonkie
      @Ebi.Adonkie Год назад +4

      I thought it was strange too. Eco warrior that felt really good killing animals. Just a stupid movie overall

    • @leroy1154
      @leroy1154 Год назад

      Well first off, because they don't "co-exist". The Megs all live and exist with in the depths of the Mariana Trench. They don't exist or live outside of it (barring events of the movies where they "escape"). While they may visit and explore it, the Trench is not the natural habitat of humans. At no point, at least that I recall, does Jonas suggest that the Megs that exist and live within the Trench should be killed. It's only when they escape and become a treat to people that he was ok with killing them. Think of it like a dog lover, who loves dogs, but is alright with shooting a feral dog that attacks livestock or people.
      Also, who says the Meg is rare? In 2 movies we've seen at least 6 different Megs, one of which was pretty scared up, implying logs of fights with other Megs.

    • @JizzyF83
      @JizzyF83 5 месяцев назад

      Haiqi Meg definitely killed to Octopus out of instinct, I’m refusing to believe it meant to save Jiuming.

  • @ashleydickerson1905
    @ashleydickerson1905 Год назад +42

    I held out for years on watching the first movie, only caving in when trailers for the second started coming out. Now I wish I had seen it in theaters and not on just a big screen at home because the shot where the Meg comes out of the shadows behind Meiying is soooooo good! Still don’t understand the way it gave me chills, but also put a huge smile on my face😂

    • @neo-filthyfrank1347
      @neo-filthyfrank1347 Год назад

      What interest of yours have you reached the highest level of detail in? If any.

    • @reid3576
      @reid3576 Год назад

      Right! Me and my gf saw it at a drive in cus it was all that was playing and it still to this day one of the most pleasantly surprised I’ve ever been watching a movie. Me and my gf enjoyed it from start to finish. No difference with this movie. So many great moments and awesome shots. Yet these reviewers nitpick these movies calling them out for every little “unrealistic” detail. Such a sad way to watch movies

  • @compatriot852
    @compatriot852 Год назад +260

    "How to ruin a franchise" really is something we've seen a lot in recent years

    • @stillcantbesilencedevennow
      @stillcantbesilencedevennow Год назад +18

      Almost like it's on purpose....
      "You'll own nothing, and like it."

    • @joshmerchant8737
      @joshmerchant8737 Год назад +1

      @@stillcantbesilencedevennow im almost 100% convinced most movies this year and last year were actually written by ai. i dont buy into most conspiracy stuff, just that corporate execs are cheap bastards.

    • @Jack5628
      @Jack5628 Год назад +4

      Trying to build something amazing only for that thing to explode 10 seconds later

    • @GameTimeWhy
      @GameTimeWhy Год назад

      ​@@stillcantbesilencedevennowyeah because bad movies, shrink-flation and other anti-consumer, pro corporation moves never happened before in history. Good call little NPC. Keep repeating the information your talking heads downloaded into you.

    • @baddogmtv
      @baddogmtv Год назад

      The first one was shite. Who care if this one is stupid.?

  • @Blasted2Oblivion
    @Blasted2Oblivion Год назад +104

    I haven't seen Meg 2 but Meg really felt like one of those SyFy channel Friday movies but with a bigger budget.

    • @dantauche7917
      @dantauche7917 Год назад +7

      I LOVED those when I was a kid

    • @spencers4121
      @spencers4121 Год назад +10

      I saw the first Meg movie, wasn't expecting much to be honest. But it was an ok popcorn type movie to me anyway, have no desire to see meg 2 to be honest.

    • @keegantripp1245
      @keegantripp1245 Год назад +4

      Honestly it’s not that bad. It’s a turn your brain off movie and enjoy.

    • @madsjrgensen8939
      @madsjrgensen8939 Год назад

      No there are movies where you switch your brain off, then there are movies like this one where you blow your brain out because of how bad an over the top stupid it really is, should have gone more with the style of the first one, not this peace of garbage that has no place in movie history, that´s how bad this shit is. But glad you enjoyed dumbing your brain down to something like this peace of trash

  • @TheRisingHeroz
    @TheRisingHeroz Год назад +89

    The film was basically what they did to Jurassic World: Dominion instead of it being about dinosaurs it was about big companies and the dinosaurs were sidelined. When the villain was talking about plundering the earth of its materials I couldn't help but roll my eyes at how cartoon villainy it was

    • @ColvyMolvy
      @ColvyMolvy Год назад +8

      Am yet to see this (probably won't because I loved the books) but in the book its what the main goal of the corporation was. The only access to a mineral to use in building a fusion reactor. The problem was all the damned giant sharks and Kronosaurs lol

    • @TheRisingHeroz
      @TheRisingHeroz Год назад +2

      @ColvyMolvy if that's how it was in the books then thanks for telling me haven't finished reading them. I think it could have been done better for the films

    • @koreancowboy42
      @koreancowboy42 Год назад +6

      Yeah Jurassic park and world just loved the typical bad military, hunter, scientist greedy villain type whatever. I'm like *facepalm*
      Can WE GET SOMETHING ELSE!?
      And their villain deaths are so shit....

    • @TheRisingHeroz
      @TheRisingHeroz Год назад +3

      @koreancowboy42 and the villains are always killed by the trex or some carnivore and they act like the dino is a hero. It's like yeah the trex saved them at the end of 1 but they ran out of there bc staying there would mean that they would be eaten.

    • @rustyshackleford234
      @rustyshackleford234 Год назад +5

      “Mwahahahha! I’m gonna KILL all of the _____ so I can get the rare earth materials/money/stuff that helps biznis”

  • @hung8969
    @hung8969 Год назад +97

    My father doesn’t go to movies, he’s a construction worker, over 55 and only likes westerners. But he enjoys jaws ALOT. So he got into the first Meg and loved it. He went ALONE to this one… went to lunch with him the other day and he made a small comment “ nothing like jaws, even that was worse than jaws 3” if something is as bad as Jaws 3. I couldn’t even imagine

    • @freakystyley4000
      @freakystyley4000 Год назад +7

      Um, Jaws The Revenge?

    • @sentientmustache8360
      @sentientmustache8360 Год назад

      @@freakystyley4000dear GOD

    • @donovanbradford8231
      @donovanbradford8231 Год назад +1

      Oh my lawd Jaws 3 that is a low bar indeed. So it's not so much you needed to check your brain at the door so much as you just didn't get one at birth.

  • @shainewhite2781
    @shainewhite2781 Год назад +115

    12:53, in the novel, they named the shark Angel, which is 72 ft long and weighs up to 30 tons.
    Also in the novel, Jonas and his friends also have an encounter with a Kronosaurus, which is never revealed how big it is, but it might be the size of a blue whale, 100 ft long and weighs up to 90 tons.

    • @shainewhite2781
      @shainewhite2781 Год назад +25

      @prehistorichero2755 It's supposed to be a giant Nautilus or Ammonite, as they grew to massive size, as big as a Toyota Tundra!

    • @Sackquaza
      @Sackquaza Год назад +19

      @prehistorichero2755 The Hell's Aquarium novel had a gigantic Vampire Squid in it, so they may have tried to use that without thinking about it.

    • @anunabhadutta1436
      @anunabhadutta1436 Год назад +7

      the first encounter with kronosaurus was underwater in the trench. where did they come from? they are not aquatic breathing species, i donot understand

    • @anunabhadutta1436
      @anunabhadutta1436 Год назад +8

      @prehistorichero2755 that raises more questions. If for millions of years they have evolved to thrive solely underwater, how come they attack ppl on land at the end of the movie? This is not even taking account of pressure difference

    • @anunabhadutta1436
      @anunabhadutta1436 Год назад

      @prehistorichero2755Godzilla never evolved for millions of years to remain underwater sir. Suspension of belief is what i can do, suspension of bullshit is what i cant

  • @greenkoopa
    @greenkoopa Год назад +7

    This isn't a comedy channel but damn you had me rollin with the Arnold memes 🤣🤣🐢

  • @pixiebomb28
    @pixiebomb28 Год назад +9

    That scene with DJ and the survival pack reminds me of LL Cool J in Deep Blue sea for some reason

    • @JizzyF83
      @JizzyF83 5 месяцев назад

      I swear it’s him that starts rapping during the credits too

  • @Nic-with-the-Beard
    @Nic-with-the-Beard Год назад +52

    Listening to the plot explained, I'm starting to get very suspicious that it was written by A.I. as a demo ahead of the writer's strike.

    • @10pmmemes88
      @10pmmemes88 Год назад +1

      Hollywood might honestly be higher quality if it was Ai generated. That's how bad modern cinema is.

    • @aetriandimitri190
      @aetriandimitri190 Год назад +3

      ​@@10pmmemes88it'd be better if they didn't rush writers and paid them fairly. I love ai, but it's absolutely not going to make masterpieces in writing

    • @jerryg4534
      @jerryg4534 Год назад

      Same

    • @yaJA._.
      @yaJA._. Год назад

      @@aetriandimitri190how do you know we’re literally at the starting point of A.I

    • @aetriandimitri190
      @aetriandimitri190 Год назад +2

      @@yaJA._. except we aren't, we've been using ai for years, its only just gotten mainstream and popular in public eye, its been used in the back for a long time. Ai can't create something entirely new, its whole purpose is to mash things together. All it can end up doing is make a bunch of random scenarios, and then give inspiration to a person

  • @shelbyjackson1128
    @shelbyjackson1128 Год назад +4

    Idk know what I like more, the dissection of this... interesting...film, or the amazing use of Arnold clips lol

  • @napros
    @napros Год назад +5

    The only problem with The Meg 2 is the editing bloopers, that no one has bothered to mention. At 1:24 Jason Statham says "I got this", then heads out riding a jet ski, so he takes the 3 harpoons and heads out to face the 3 Megs alone, only problem is he wastes 1 of the harpoons at 1:29:30, now he is down to 2 harpoons. This is where it gets interesting (bad editing). At 1:29:35 the aerial shot shows he has none, then back at water level he has the harpoons again, but wait for the real blooper, at 1:29:58 he still has the 3 harpoons, then at 1:32:54 he only has 1 left. So not only does he take all 3 harpoons, he wastes 1, should be down to 2 but ends up with the full 3, then out of nowhere he has only 1 left (Which is then shot out of his hands by the villain on the speedboat using machine guns). So if they are going to spend so much money on making a film, you would think they would at least make sure when they do the editing, someone would, at least, check it for errors. Nothing like recycling shots that doesn't even make sense (reference to the aerial shot with no harpoons).

  • @MrHellsing76
    @MrHellsing76 Год назад +32

    I have a feeling AI writing played a part in this film's script.

    • @Cenentury0941
      @Cenentury0941 Год назад +5

      Well, AI isn't a part of the writers strike so maybe it was lmao

    • @brettwood1351
      @brettwood1351 Год назад +1

      @@Cenentury0941 With the writers issues getting paid especially residuals from streaming, maybe they decided to just phone it in.

    • @phoenix211245
      @phoenix211245 Год назад +3

      ​@@brettwood1351When the writers produce sub par work like this, why should they get paid?

    • @nyrangersfan6325
      @nyrangersfan6325 Год назад

      @@phoenix211245exactly what I was saying!

  • @rockymay386
    @rockymay386 Год назад +20

    Underwater is such a great film. Everyone needs to watch it.

    • @calebday6988
      @calebday6988 Год назад

      it doesnt do cosmic horror good at all lmao. bad movie

    • @CantankerousDave
      @CantankerousDave 9 месяцев назад

      A solid creature feature, I thought.

  • @PeteOnTheBeat
    @PeteOnTheBeat Год назад +11

    My wife loves Sharks and love Meg. She wanted to watch this on the cinema and there I went along. I felt sorry for her. 80% of the movie without sharks ffs. If I were alone I would have left the room. So stupid,so bad.

  • @peterstoric6560
    @peterstoric6560 Год назад +25

    I went into the theater board and expecting a cheesy creature feature and honestly it’s exactly what I got. While not as good as the first I still found fun in this movie as it wasn’t too far off from the tone established in the first. All in all, it is what it is.

    • @kyleellis1825
      @kyleellis1825 Год назад +1

      My issue is the budget. This should have been a B movie for 1/4 of the budget if it's going to be stupid. If people are going to spend A List money on a movie, it should have it's script gone over twice.

    • @ContactsNfilters
      @ContactsNfilters Год назад

      A cheesy movie with some cheesy popcorn sounds perfect. 👌

  • @bread4635
    @bread4635 Год назад +7

    I unironically loved the meg 2, it was just a fun movie to watch and eat popcorn too

  • @spicybeantofu
    @spicybeantofu Год назад +6

    The Meg was a good monster movie. I didn't even know there was a second one and from the sounds of it I'm glad lol

  • @ventii_kun
    @ventii_kun Год назад +17

    I recently saw this movie with my family and it’s goofy as hell! (strong Sharknado vibes). I know this isn’t the main issue with this film, but I’m still trying to understand just how the hell they managed to get great cell reception at 25,000 ft below sea level. And also, what kind of material on earth did they use to create their scuba diving eco suits? Fucking Vibranium!?😂😂😂

  • @withertempestprime8718
    @withertempestprime8718 Год назад +4

    Ah Hollywood, you never stop disappointing me.

  • @johngriffey3902
    @johngriffey3902 Год назад +3

    Yes, yes, yes!! my man bringing it to me real just like he always does! This is why I subscribe to this man's channel!! He isn't afraid to say what has to be said. Love the honesty and format, so from San Antonio fricken TEXAS, keep it up my man! And God bless!

  • @LauraDyehouse
    @LauraDyehouse Год назад +17

    I've been waiting for this video to drop!! 😂 Can always count on you for a full in depth analysis of movies I don't want to spend money on but am so curious about!! ❤

  • @seanr152
    @seanr152 Год назад +4

    I gotta say,Niyat adding memes to the reviews is good addition 😂😂

  • @therestingmitchface6241
    @therestingmitchface6241 Год назад +21

    I remember being so excited when I saw a trailer for this movie… and then I saw dinosaurs and said uh oh
    Thank you for saving me money and satisfying my curiosity

  • @CryosisOfficial
    @CryosisOfficial Год назад +7

    I've seen a lot of people saying that the sharks are barely in the movie, but I went to watch the movie the other week and did we watch the same movie? The sharks are pretty consistently featured over the full course of the plot with a similar amount of screentime as the sharks in the first movie, while also juggling several other creatures and a human antagonist plot.

  • @christianjeffress5312
    @christianjeffress5312 Год назад +81

    Honestly, the movie had me laughing at some of the stupidity, more than anything, and my BS meter going off more than once. I saw the movie as more of a dumb comedy with some action in it than anything else. The first movie was definitely by far better in my opinion.

    • @mryasraz471
      @mryasraz471 Год назад +1

      il iked meg 2 more than the first . I liked the human villain and characters . overall amazing movie. i like movies which has good characters and show less monsters. thats a good formula

    • @creatrixZBD
      @creatrixZBD Год назад +3

      That’s what I’m going to see it for. A whole lotta larger-than-life stoopid. Perfect temporary escape from all the wrong kinds of stupid irl.

    • @tooreal4softassyoutube
      @tooreal4softassyoutube Год назад +1

      Both we're garbage

    • @murk4552
      @murk4552 Год назад +1

      ​@@tooreal4softassyoutubecause everyone didn't die? Wah wah

  • @goldiesworld2095
    @goldiesworld2095 Год назад +10

    The 1st Meg was sooooo good this is why it’s on to leave movies alone they don’t need part 2 sometimes 🤦🏽‍♀️

    • @jgstudios117
      @jgstudios117 Год назад +1

      It's supposed to be a fun summer movie if you watch it for the plot then go watch something else 🙄

  • @khalidamajoud4114
    @khalidamajoud4114 Год назад +11

    Well, that was to be expected! 🤷‍♂️

  • @neffdeathwatch7641
    @neffdeathwatch7641 Год назад +8

    It was okay 😂😂😂..... better than what The Flash was that ending with the Spartan Kick I was laughing. $12 wasn't bad.

  • @LordEriolTolkien
    @LordEriolTolkien Год назад +4

    ''We're gunna need a bigger Statham..''

  • @johnlarsen9187
    @johnlarsen9187 Год назад +42

    Not sure if you actually watched the first film. But Jonas was not a paleobiologist, he was a deep sea rescue diver.

    • @cread13
      @cread13 Год назад +5

      This was my understanding as well or at least that he was former military/coast guard

    • @bigtyg21
      @bigtyg21 Год назад +1

      well if you read the books then you would know that he was a deep sea diver for the navy and after getting the boot from that job became a paleontologist to prove that the meg exists

    • @johnlarsen9187
      @johnlarsen9187 Год назад

      @@bigtyg21 had the reviewer referenced the books as stating that information, and not the previous movie, this thread would not exist.

  • @AlexGNR
    @AlexGNR Год назад +28

    Even though I really enjoyed the Meg 2 as a movie, having recently started reading the book "The Meg: Hell's Aquarium" I cannot help but wonder what went on in the heads of the movie producers.
    Angel renaming to Haiqi.. Like come on. And why did she not look like an Albino 90% of the time and then a few shots she suddenly is an Albino like in the books...
    I do still want them to make a 3rd movie, but please, different writers and director who want to stay as true as possible to the book and fix things up by having the BS meter up to oblivion in the first act to make the transition proper and then quickly take a turn to the more serious and dark, thriller/horror aspect the books have.
    Because I for sure want to see more Megs on screen. They just gotta have the right guys. Heck, why not hire Alten to help write the script if he wants. It is what they did with the Maze Runner Triology with James Dashner who helped write the scripts of the movies there to stay true to his books.
    Overal I did like the story of the Meg 2 if we see it as a separate thing and as a fun movie. Besides that, IMO not a true Meg movie. Hopefully they can fix shit for a Meg 3 movie as I want to see the books come to life.
    Otherwise we need some other big producer to also make a cinema version of Alten's books because the amount they deviated in the Meg 2 was just absurd.
    I do still recommend watching it though, and just be sure that we all voice our opinions. Perhaps someone should start a petition for THE MEG 3 to be as true to the book as possible maybe? Like, they got the budget going for it by now.

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +7

      He wrote the first screenplay back in like 07 but after 10 years of development hell and being bought out by a Chinese studio he's been completely pushed to the side, Altens writes realistic horror when the suits want child safe camppy.

    • @nonenone4618
      @nonenone4618 Год назад +5

      Nah. Alten wrote an article stating that he did sell out, and that he didn't regret it. He wanted the money.

    • @CelesteSinger1
      @CelesteSinger1 Год назад +1

      @@nonenone4618 Which article and when was it written?

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +2

      @@nonenone4618 After 10 years of Parkinson's no shit he'll need some financial help. He's happy for the pay but probably wasn't honest when it came to reviewing the movie.

    • @brettwood1351
      @brettwood1351 Год назад +5

      Any changes to Chinese names or nationalities from the book can easily be explained as Panda-ring to Chinese film markets.

  • @IchigoKurosaki_
    @IchigoKurosaki_ Год назад +51

    Wait, this movie wasn't something to be taken seriously?!? 🤯

    • @og_colombian7025
      @og_colombian7025 Год назад +13

      Just because it shouldnt be taken seriously didn't mean it has to be bad

  • @TheGamingPastry
    @TheGamingPastry Год назад +8

    Meg 2 is gonna end up being the first movie whos script was written by AI, i know it

  • @raynightshade8317
    @raynightshade8317 Год назад +5

    This movie feels like a sequel to a different movie and the Meg at the same time somehow

  • @keegantripp1245
    @keegantripp1245 Год назад +3

    Taylor wasn’t a marine biologist, he was an ex rescue diver. In the second film he’s called an eco warrior but since we don’t know who he generally went after it looks like he went after the most dangerous ones, like the ones dumped radioactive material. With what he knows is down there the last thing he wants is a mutation to occur and cause something from the trench or elsewhere to become a bigger problem than a shark.
    Plus that opening scene is reminiscent of what happened in WW2 where US PBYs and other floating aircraft would land on the water while still maintaining speed and pick up downed pilots, all while under possible enemy fire.

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад

      You clearly didn't read the book

    • @keegantripp1245
      @keegantripp1245 Год назад

      @@damonlongstreet8630 I tried to, but couldn’t find book 1 and knew that the movies took parts and plots from them. I mainly went by the movie instead at this point.

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад

      @@keegantripp1245 audio book for 1 n 2 should be on RUclips

  • @sos_legio_primus
    @sos_legio_primus Год назад +4

    This felt more like an Asylum mock-buster version of The Meg.
    Rather than the sequel to the first Meg.

  • @jurassictyrantkingYT
    @jurassictyrantkingYT Год назад +41

    The problem with the Meg 2 is the fact that Megalodon is a cenozoic apex predator of the Seas that just recently died out three million years ago where T-Rex died out during the end of the Mesozoic Era 66 million years ago. Even though it's basically just entertainment is still very confusing on why they put Megalodon in the age of dinosaurs when Megalodon was feasting on whales 3 million years ago.

    • @animezilla4486
      @animezilla4486 Год назад +1

      As long as it's entertaining people really don't care if it doesn't make sense

    • @jurassictyrantkingYT
      @jurassictyrantkingYT Год назад +1

      @@animezilla4486 that's why I said that I know it's just entertainment.

    • @benjenkins5995
      @benjenkins5995 Год назад +6

      It makes even less sense considering that whole scene was originally in the first novel and was simply shown as a hypothetical situation to show how intimidating the Meg is meant to be. It’s a speech by Jonas in the beginning of the novel and he even says once he’s finished something along the lines of “well anyway that wouldn’t happen since they didn’t coexist but if they did it would probably be like that”. Why they didn’t do that here…who knows?

    • @Cenentury0941
      @Cenentury0941 Год назад +2

      @@jurassictyrantkingYT If it's just entertainment and people don't really care if it doesn't make sense, then the thing about the time frame being wrong couldn't possibly be "the problem" with meg 2 though.

    • @DensilGrant
      @DensilGrant Год назад +1

      Because none of those shit ever existed 😂

  • @labelladonna9122
    @labelladonna9122 Год назад +9

    I hate what they did to this amazing book series. I have no hopes for Hells Aquarium or seeing Jonas and Terry's children

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +1

      You could say we got a Chinese knock of 🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭

    • @Tainted_Human
      @Tainted_Human Год назад

      Wait these are based off books?

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад

      @@Tainted_Human Writen by Steve Alten and are the exact opposite of the movies, Realistic Horror Thrillers with Lots of Gore.
      Meg 1997, The Trench 1999, Meg Primal Waters 2005, Meg Hells Aquarium 2009, Meg Nightstackers 2016, Meg Generations 2018, Meg Purgatory 2025/26.
      Steve just started the release of a special Legacy collection, check it out.

    • @diegofavaratozfilms962
      @diegofavaratozfilms962 5 месяцев назад

      @@Tainted_Humanyes

  • @damianstarks3338
    @damianstarks3338 Год назад +7

    Fantastic review of this Meg sequel

  • @mr.belphegor8185
    @mr.belphegor8185 Год назад +9

    You can't ruin an already bad first movie with a second bad movie

  • @mrbill8763
    @mrbill8763 Год назад +12

    I hate that for this movie so much. Meg wasn’t an awesome movie but it was a good movie. I hate that they wrecked the sequel.

  • @chefc8371
    @chefc8371 Год назад +8

    If they would’ve just followed more closely and exactly MEG by Steve Alten, that would’ve been great.

  • @steveba50
    @steveba50 Год назад +9

    Could be nominated for an Academy award……. For best comedy feature 😂

  • @nigeldonaldson1647
    @nigeldonaldson1647 Год назад +5

    Speaking for myself, I liked the idea of the Corporate villain's motive being to mine the mineral found only in the trench, & worth as much as Diamond, they DO have a purpose-industrial espionage, & treasure hunting, the connection between the fly tipper dumpers and the greedy Corporates also worked. my only other critisism is that the film was a little over stuffed at times, but this is a common problem with modern cinema, especially films that involve a lot of spectacle and action

  • @franciscovasquez2106
    @franciscovasquez2106 Год назад +3

    It was a dumb but fun movie that didn't take itself too seriously. Like the scene where Jason Statham exits the airlock without a suit in the Mariana trench, it was ridiculous cuz we know any person or mammal would instantly be crushed and freeze to death.
    But if you can suspend your disbelief for a while, you can definitely enjoy the movie.

  • @brettwood1351
    @brettwood1351 Год назад +6

    When they announced they were doing The Trench, I wanted exactly one thing out of this. Meg vs Kronosaurus. I figured I'd be dissappointed by them dropping that, but hey maybe Meg vs Kraken would be a good substitute. Sounds like the Giant Octopus is barely in here, has no real menacing buidup (like everything else), and we don't even get a good fight with it and a meg. Disappointing.

  • @reynielmoreno1505
    @reynielmoreno1505 Год назад +5

    Love this review. It had no mercy.

  • @liquidocelot4885
    @liquidocelot4885 Год назад +2

    That thumbnail is closest I'll get to Statham roundhouse kicking the Meg

  • @martynstembridge7714
    @martynstembridge7714 Год назад +10

    Ben Wheatly must have got a BIG pay day to create this mess ... He had real potential once.

  • @cretaceouscrusader661
    @cretaceouscrusader661 Год назад +5

    There's no way those amphibious reptiles were Kronosaurus.
    In fact, I can't believe they were even reptiles at all. They must have been basal amphibians with residual gills to allow them to breathe underwater.

  • @michaelhowell2326
    @michaelhowell2326 Год назад +4

    It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off.

  • @jtmplmbr4465
    @jtmplmbr4465 Год назад +1

    This one almost pushed Niyat over the edge.

  • @mprojekt72
    @mprojekt72 Год назад +6

    Aaand another movie that I add to my list of other movies that I pretend were never made. Subjectively fictional fiction that I swiftly learn to edit out of my vision and hearing; sort of like "Highlander 2," which many people tell me is a thing but they cannot prove its existence, even while waving a weirdly blank VHS/Laserdisc/DVD/BluRay in front of my face.

  • @jasonburke1671
    @jasonburke1671 Год назад +4

    Yknow, the first Meg is honestly the first time ive seen the movie actually TONE DOWN the attacks and blockbuster action. Literally the way he kills the first meg in the book is by swimming into its insides and stabbing bother hearts while holding his breath

  • @Jorunic
    @Jorunic Год назад +4

    Please cover the 95 movie Congo, it needs a spotlight and is one of the few, imo, remakes that needs to happen.

  • @skyflyerace7972
    @skyflyerace7972 Год назад +5

    I liked the kraken a lot I just wish they used more deep sea creatures to the full extent.

  • @trieuvann8763
    @trieuvann8763 Год назад +10

    Love that you don't hold back on your hatred to this nonsense while being articulated

  • @dammagrilla
    @dammagrilla Год назад +2

    Would've never guessed these movies were based on books...

  • @JPOG7TV
    @JPOG7TV Год назад +6

    You can’t ruin a franchise that was never good.
    At least the books are still interesting.

    • @animezilla4486
      @animezilla4486 Год назад

      I disagree with you completely the franchise was good

  • @ninjamasterbuilder8675
    @ninjamasterbuilder8675 Год назад +5

    Well maybe Mei remembered her experience from the first movie and matured some especially seeing a meg get close to the glass but not bite the glass or metal probably removed her fear some

  • @adammacdonald5332
    @adammacdonald5332 Год назад +10

    It still couldn't be worse than what Disney has done to it's brand. What a high bar, todays standards

  • @markthomson1816
    @markthomson1816 Год назад +1

    Wouldn't have been surprised if jason by the end scene drove a car down the trench with no suit on to the bottom and headlocked 7 megs to death while kicking one up 8miles to the surface

  • @codyarrington7693
    @codyarrington7693 Год назад +5

    Jonas was a deep sea rescue team leader in the first Meg movie. He wasn't a paleo-biologist. That was in the books. So him being more active/buff and being able to fight take on other men make sense in the Meg 2.

  • @garythescouttrooper4908
    @garythescouttrooper4908 Год назад +2

    Ah, so The MEG 2 is basically Jaws II for 21st century audiences. Fun.

  • @Marcin9200
    @Marcin9200 Год назад +4

    If sharknado had budget

  • @grandadmiralzaarin4962
    @grandadmiralzaarin4962 Год назад +22

    It's the "Godzilla" problem where for some bizarre reason they think people go to watch giant monster films for the generic revolving door of people...which utterly baffles me. Keep the same characters and focus on the actual TITLE MONSTER.

    • @robertban871
      @robertban871 Год назад

      i guess its cheaper to pay a few million dollars to the actors to do whatever than to pay for the visual effects to have the monster on screen longer. older monster movies dont have this excuse tho, so i cant explain that one

    • @grandadmiralzaarin4962
      @grandadmiralzaarin4962 Год назад

      @@robertban871 I'm not sure that is the case. Usually when this kind of thing happens it's due to Studio Execs that don't have any understanding of what made the first film successful. They don't watch it, they don't have any passion for it, it's just a series of check boxes and focus groups for them. The Executives were born into money and marketing, the actual quality of what they sell means nothing to them as long as people buy it. Sadly since this film already made back its money and a large profit, that trend will continue as the Executives never lose their jobs when films fail, only the artists do and so another potentially interesting film series dies stillborn.

    • @johnlawful2272
      @johnlawful2272 Год назад +1

      @@robertban871 yeah older movies had actors dressed as monsters

    • @stillcantbesilencedevennow
      @stillcantbesilencedevennow Год назад +3

      ​@@robertban871older films were hiding bad FX. They had excuses. Modern? Weak sauce.

    • @sarajohnson6855
      @sarajohnson6855 Год назад

      That's my main complaint to with these movies to, too many people! Give me the monster! However I can just appreciate for what the movie is, a dumb shark summer movie. 😂

  • @Kreau
    @Kreau Год назад +5

    What Niyat just rip apart Statham's character is just peak commentary!

  • @malalford
    @malalford Год назад

    Cliff Curtis tryna attack through the mace was hilarious.

  • @dragoncat9153
    @dragoncat9153 Год назад +5

    (look somebody's gotta be that guy) kronosaurus wasn't a dinosaur it was a marin reptile, those are different things
    Unimportant details aside good video, no clue how I never heard of the sequel coming out until now

  • @718Insomniac
    @718Insomniac Год назад +1

    Producers Ego, to the producer, "Am I a joke to you?"

  • @DiaryOfaCell
    @DiaryOfaCell Год назад +19

    I had such high hopes for this movie, and I left so disappointed.

  • @thearmchairjournalist566
    @thearmchairjournalist566 Год назад +1

    Whoop Whoop - an upload to cap the week off 👌

  • @tonyc8258
    @tonyc8258 Год назад +17

    This is one of those turn off your brain popcorn munchers you watch with friends and make fun of
    Unfortunately, even that can outstay its welcome, and that’s what this movie did. Even the latest Jurassic world film had moments of tension with creative designs for new dinosaurs that were (mostly) likeable
    This is just “a bigger shark” plus an octopus

  • @bresoccercards6461
    @bresoccercards6461 Год назад +2

    Meg 2 doing well at the box office and that is all that matters.

  • @paranoyd70
    @paranoyd70 Год назад +14

    Thanks for saving me $30 bucks. I can tolerate dumb movies if they are done right, but this sequel feels so lazy in the writing that had I paid to watch it, I would be pissed to the point I'd want my money back. Again, I can tolerate some stupidness, but I have a limit and this movie crosses the line.

  • @Galactus78
    @Galactus78 Год назад +2

    Underwater really was slept on

  • @andrewcoulthard-clark
    @andrewcoulthard-clark Год назад +7

    I imagine that as it was mandated that it had to be PG, so there could be no blood or gore, and people could only be swallowed whole didn't help.

    • @damonlongstreet8630
      @damonlongstreet8630 Год назад +3

      It was both sad and hilarious watching normies caim/believe it was gonna be R

  • @StarShopping69
    @StarShopping69 Год назад +1

    I threw my hands up so many times in this movie like the blade through the Meg's head etc. The CGI was Sci-fi channel levels of bad for the smaller dino's in the finale. I was the most let down as the premise of exploring more of the trench and seeing all these cools creatures in action with stellar CGI sounded so fun.

  • @chaudcarte
    @chaudcarte Год назад +8

    Hello! Can you please do a video exploring the movie Enemy (2013) by Denis Villeneuve? Thank you😊

  • @damianirovano0789
    @damianirovano0789 Год назад +2

    I love the fact that film comics explained slowly descends into insanity cause of this movie 😂😂😂😂

  • @shainewhite2781
    @shainewhite2781 Год назад +4

    5:10, this scene is actually a big middle finger to Universal and JURASSIC PARK for taking all the box office revenue. Lol!

  • @fubecafy
    @fubecafy Год назад +1

    I wish I would have seen this before buying tickets and enduring the two hours of this movie.

  • @Explorator_101
    @Explorator_101 Год назад +5

    Scriptwriters demands for a pay rise. But then give us scripts like this. 😂

    • @stillcantbesilencedevennow
      @stillcantbesilencedevennow Год назад +4

      "but we want a liveable wage"
      -*Folks who make thousands upon thousands for writing what's already been written, but tweaking it for 'modern audiences' how delightful*.

    • @kevinhalo1896
      @kevinhalo1896 Год назад +2

      AI WROTE THIS MOVIE NOT REAL PEOPLE.

  • @I_am_ENSanity
    @I_am_ENSanity Год назад +1

    And after how much I liked the books, it really is sad how poorly the movies turned out.

  • @theworstisover1323
    @theworstisover1323 Год назад +5

    I think I understand what happened here... Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

  • @quinnthedemon7650
    @quinnthedemon7650 Год назад

    hats off to you for actually sitting through this movie. i stopped halfway.