Lithium Rechargeable AA Batteries - Tested and Compared vs Ni-MH

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 апр 2024
  • In this video, we test a new set of Lithium Rechargeable AA batteries from POWEROWL. They are tested against similar Ni-MH rechargeable batteries to see how they perform and how long they last.
    Thank you to POWEROWL for providing these batteries for review.
    Find them here with a discount code provided by POWEROWL
    amzn.to/4cCAN8o
    Here are the NiMH batteries I tested before:
    amzn.to/3U7U9uX
    Don't forget about our FamilyGeekery Podcast, with new episodes every Tuesday!
    familygeekery.com/podpage
    Find our other Social Media and other Links here:
    linktr.ee/familygeekery
    Support FamilyGeekery by Getting a Good Deal for Yourself!
    Pretty Litter - Get a free bag of our favorite kitty litter - familygeekery.com/prettylitter
    StickerMule - Get $10 off your first order at StickerMule - familygeekery.com/stickermule
    Amazon - Support our channel by using this link when you buy stuff at Amazon - familygeekery.com/amazon
    Thank you for any/all support!
    Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you buy something through our the above we may get a small share of the sale. Thank you for supporting the channel!
    #powerowl
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 9

  • @brantleyrobbins7188
    @brantleyrobbins7188 2 месяца назад

    Good vid and info

  • @marksaustralia6464
    @marksaustralia6464 2 месяца назад +2

    Mmm yeah OK. This wasn't a review of different batteries. It was a sponsored review of power owls

    • @FamilyGeekery
      @FamilyGeekery  2 месяца назад +3

      Partially true. Which is why I’m required by law to state up front that I received the product from the company for review purposes. I could have simply just said “these things are great”, but I actually take the time to test each product out and report my results. And I reject a LOT more products than I accept, lol. But thank you in any case for watching. I hope you got something out of it. My sole purpose is not a simple sales pitch, but at the same time, I do run a business and I have to make decisions based on continuing to support the costs involved.

  • @giou9671
    @giou9671 2 месяца назад +3

    The lithium says 3000mWh not mAH so the capacity is much less.

    • @FamilyGeekery
      @FamilyGeekery  2 месяца назад +1

      Good catch! You are correct. So at 1.5v, the 3000 mWh lithium would be 2000 mAh. But with my simple flashlight test, they still outlasted the NiMh for some reason. Which is why I always just use advertised numbers as a ballpark comparison. Thanks for catching my oversight!

    • @OptimaGamingTeam
      @OptimaGamingTeam Месяц назад

      Lithium batteries also stay at the voltage much longer than Ni-MH as Ni-MH starts dropping voltage at 50% remaining vs lithium is 15% remaining before a huge drop off and Alkaline is always decreasing voltage as it's capacity lowers

    • @mattklapman
      @mattklapman Месяц назад

      battery power and current ratings are usually market driven as they calculate their ratings with different testing setups, typically with different current draws. So one would need to run a consistent load-drain test to get proper ratings. For example, a high consistent drain will show a lower overall capacity than a pulsed low current drain. The data sheets usually show enough data to get a better feel.

  • @MrRightNow
    @MrRightNow 4 дня назад

    Where was the "tested" portion of the video as the title suggests?? All you did was rambled about 2 batteries, not very informative

    • @FamilyGeekery
      @FamilyGeekery  4 дня назад

      I explained that the best way I could test the batteries up against each other was by draining them with a flashlight, so I did report those results. Comparing volts and such wouldn’t really be comparing apples to apples (different chemistries, etc). So I went with a more simplistic/practical test. Sorry if you didn’t find it helpful. Thanks for watching my rambling anyhow, lol.