Because maybe she probably knows that she's responsible for officer John O' Keefe death !! Even if she didn't actually ran him over .But I have feeling that she knows more than what she's saying and also what really happen to officer John O' Keefe that night.🤔
The judge appears sympathetic to the commonwealth and consistently nit picking anything that the defense team attempts to introduce. Effectively preventing them from providing a fair defense. She particularly seems abrasive towards Mr. Jackson and Ms. Little Once the trial is underway,it’ll be interesting to see, if she can rule fairly.
You guys love parroting Turtleboy . It’s amazing the legal opinions people like yourself provide. Non-attorneys who have never even read the rules of evidence or criminal procedure, never mind applied these legal precepts and theories during actual trials suddenly become legal scholars on evidentiary issues. Cite your cases legal scholar. On which motions in limine did judge Cannone misapply the rules of evidence, which specific rule, and what’s the applicable caselaw? As actual criminal defense attorneys know, judge Cannone has provided a generous amount of lead way on evidentiary issues when it comes to the defense, out of an abundance of caution. Not only has she done this in the Read case but in many others. It’s the reason why she is so well respected by the defense bar, including myself, in Massachusetts.
@@Michaelcollin-wu2ng She is biased and has been from the beginning. The fact that she is not allowing the cause of death on the death certificate, specifically "Undetermined", in evidence shows that. There is NOTHING in the rules of evidence that prevents manner of death Undetermined to be allowed into evidence. Only Homicide, Accidental and Suicide have superior court rulings precluding these to be allowed into evidence. It is SHOCKING that she would not allow this into evidence. So you may respect a biased judge, who has a personal relationship with one of the "witnesses" in this case and refused to recuse herself, but people with higher standards of ethics do not. And that's just 2 examples of bias out of many, many more. She's be reassigned to civil court, yet she insisted on keeping this case. Wonder why. But I'm not worried. She'll be investigated once this case is over. And THAT I'm very much looking forward to. She can then huff and puff all she wants.
As a citizen, you have the right to redress your grievances with government. Feel free to contact the US attorney to query why the judge discarded a 3100 pages report from the FBI exonarating Karen Read? And why the FBI do not indict the real culprits?
why does she breathe like that - she is going to be rough to listen to during this trial - she is so bias - its like this trial is such a bother to her
Also, NOW she is worried about the sound? That court room is not a Museum, and should be updated for todays court needs and reality! She is so incompetent! Probably will ask Mr. L to fue issues with the court room …😅 I want to v!
This judge and the commonwealth of Massachusetts needs to come into the 21st century (which is already 3/4 over with) as far as audio visual presentation is concerned.
The judge is spoonfeeding the prosecutor's arguments. That was particularly the case when talking about Proctor! She's biased! She knows the Albert family! She owns a seaside cottage near the Albert's, and they share the same beach! She lied under oath!
Olivia Lambo Two fun facts: 1) Judge Cannone’s brother, John Prescott, represented Chris Albert as his attorney for his hit & run homicide back in 1994. 2) Judge Cannone’s popular nickname (in reference to this case), “Auntie Bev”, was given to her by “witness” Jen McCabe’s brother-in-law, Sean McCabe, when he threatened to bury the corpse of investigative journalist @DoctorTurtleboy -who’s been covering and broke the story- under the “seaside cottage” of the Judge. When asked if he/his family had a “line to Judge Cannone”, Sean McCabe stated: “Auntie Bev??? Whose seaside cottage do you think we're going to bury your corpse under?"
So bogus.. it’s not like there’s a plethora of binding case law from the SJC that says the cause of death should be redacted from the death certificate in cases where the cause of death is disputed between the parties since this is a material issue of fact for the jury to decide. Leaving the cause of death on the death certificate prejudices the defendant since it could confuse the jury into thinking that they are not the one to decide the cause of death and to instead take the written words on the death certificate as to the cause of death as indisputable truth. You online attorneys always give me a chuckle. If your legal scholar turtleboy said it’s bad, it must be .
I’d be interested in if it does prejudice the defense, as the coroner can be cross examined. I found it interesting. Either the CW believes their coroner and backs their findings or should have the coroner file an addendum and correction. Idk just my thoughts
@@Michaelcollin-wu2ng - Yet the ME listed the cause of death as unknown. And no, I do not think I’m an online attorney. Just think this is a strange thing to do overall. Jury is going to find out during cross that ME listed it as unknown regardless, so why redact it?
@@annm9589 nobody said anything about not believing the "coroner" (which is incorrect, btw the M.E. does an autopsy, not a coroner) there have been many cases that they redact it for the jury. It is not unheard of.
Mostly by having dinner parties with the right people, campaign contributions, and a law record that shows a high win score, which usually means you broker pleas that make you look favorable. It’s all bull s hyte
Defense had a good argument about the blood draw and the judge is deferring. I feel like defense can’t gain any traction when she rules for CW now and defers ruling for defense. It will be interesting once in trial if this changes.
All the judge best friends from top to bottom, are in on the cover-up and the killing of John O'Keefe! And she is trying very hard together with her district attorney Adam Lally, to prevent the truth is coming out and they all have to go to jail. Karen is innocent!
What a waste of taxpayers money. There’s far too much reasonable doubt in this case. Whether she’s innocent or guilty, I can’t see a jury convicting based off the evidence alone. Nevermind the lack of investigation into his death. This case is far too convoluted.
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired Try to hit ANY object, in any direction in a Lexus 570. It’s impossible. The sensors on the bumper and the fenders see the object, calculate the time of deceleration, cuts the accelerator off, and applies the brakes. I’ve tried it. I’ve backed mine at 15 mph, with a 50lb bag of PEI potatoes behind me. 10 attempts. Never got closer than 8” from the potatoes.
@@annm9589 They have those experts and they will testify during this trial even Adam Lally don't trust them as always.. ( he thinks he is the expert on everything, to hide the truth!)
@@fitzdawg821 she had the option to turn all of that off. You can do it manually on her vehicle. Maybe that explains why they upped the charges from manslaughter to murder?
Looks like the reality of the trial about to start Monday has got the defendant in reality now no more smiling and chatting and laughing and smirking smiles today 🩷 a man loss his life children family and his parents have loss a Son my condolences to his family 🤲🏻
Karen has never been financially dependent on John, is highly educated and earned all her money as a university financial mathematics professor and was not married to him. They had been in a relationship before, but because she had to move far away for work, they decided to split up. When she returned, they fell in love again, now John had his nephew and niece (parents were both deceased). That wasn't a problem for Karen, she loved them and helped raise them. (Not every woman does that!) What many people don't know is that Karen has had a history of serious illnesses since the age of 25, including Crohn's disease (a whole section of her intestines was even removed), she also developed MS and sometime after her arrest it turned out that she also had a brain tumor too, so her lawyer Yannetti didn't even know if she would make it! Karen is mentally very strong and therefore often comes across as a bit haughty, but that is because she is trying to right this enormous injustice that has be done to her, in the way she has been framed, trying to survive and show the world how it all really works with all the corruption there in Canton from top to bottom. Because even the judge and the district attorney are 100% involved in it too, and that is very clear if you watched the days in court. As the truth slowly becomes clearer, she can finally laugh a little more. The fed follows everything (nearly right from the beginning) in the background and has long since proven with the help of their own experts that she did not do it and is therefore innocent.When you are treated like a criminal day and night by the judge (Auntie Bev for the real perpetrators) and her accomplice district attorney Adam Lally, you understand that she has that grinning smile and that she really no longer stands up for that judge (who is related to all those corrupt people.) She will be acquitted but I really hope real justice for John and Karen that the truly guilty will not escape their punishment, preferably everyone who helped make this happen! And I hope that she will be rewarded for the enormous financial costs she has had to incur, she has nothing left, lost her beloved children his niece and nephew too! Has no house, no car, no job because of all of them!
Adam Lally is very smart. If I were representing the defendant, I've have filed at least 20 pre-trial motions to have ADA Lally put in a full head-to-toe clown costume w/make up and wig for the duration of this trial. It's the only way to level the playing field, and even then, the defense is going to have their work cut out for them. I just cannot think of any other legal strategy that might give Ms. Read a fighting chance in front of a Norfolk Co. jury. Not a single one. God help us.
You're funny. Perhaps you're the one wearing the clown suit. This is going to be a ridiculously easy win for the defense. Lally doesn't need to wear a clown suit. He has already demonstrated what a colossal clown he is.
The Judge is well-respected in MA and comes from a family of respected lawyers/Judges. She's fair. She may be a little out of breath, but that could be speaking closely in the mic, a technical sound issue, a health issue, or a little extra weight or stress. She has a nice soft tone speaking voice, in my opinion. She's covering many unresolved matters right before the trial and has a ton of logistics to figure out quickly. The Judge is doing exceptional for the number of issues still unresolved, with opening statements expected to start next week.
Unpopular opinion…. I hated Lally but now I just feel bad for him lol this isn’t going to go well for him and I feel like he is being used. Respectfully, he comes across as a push over and someone dirty cops could very easily manipulate.
Ya know I have to say this Alberts McCabe Proctor all police officers 👮♀️ who were in the house 🏡 the day Higgins Brian Albert Chole dog Colin and everyone who knows the truth you’re cursed your Karma is black trust me
@@EC-dz3fb😂😂😂 I just left you a response in regards to a different comment. It said..The lack of basic knowledge and common sense is sad. It seems that response will apply here , too. 😂
@@kellyross3072 The defense's theory is preposterous, untenable, and as we approach the trial, they're showing that they have mere mud to sling, though I don't doubt LE do coverup their misdeeds/criminality.
That judge is SO biased. She sounds ridiculous with all the sighing…..and rudeness.
Because maybe she probably knows that she's responsible for officer John O' Keefe death !! Even if she didn't actually ran him over .But I have feeling that she knows more than what she's saying and also what really happen to officer John O' Keefe that night.🤔
This judge is nauseating.
How do you redact anything on a death certificate when it's a murder trial?
Who's the Rodney Dangerfield bobble-head/ bailiff guy back there? 😂
This is really nauseating,again and again , Judge is so unprofessional, unprepared, and bias!
It's 𝗯𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗘𝗗. No one can be "bias," just like no one can be "prejudice."
The lack of basic knowledge and common sense is sad @EC.
This judge is terrible. She’s totally bias. She’s trying to protect herself from the corruption that’s going to blow this case wide open.
Evidence?
It's "bias𝗲𝗱."
cant listen to the prosecutor... liar liar pants on fire
The judge appears sympathetic to the commonwealth and consistently nit picking anything that the defense team attempts to introduce.
Effectively preventing them from providing a fair defense.
She particularly seems abrasive towards Mr. Jackson and Ms. Little
Once the trial is underway,it’ll be interesting to see, if she can rule fairly.
If you look up the word bias in the dictionary, you'll find Beverly Canoni as the definition.
You guys love parroting Turtleboy .
It’s amazing the legal opinions people like yourself provide. Non-attorneys who have never even read the rules of evidence or criminal procedure, never mind applied these legal precepts and theories during actual trials suddenly become legal scholars on evidentiary issues.
Cite your cases legal scholar. On which motions in limine did judge Cannone misapply the rules of evidence, which specific rule, and what’s the applicable caselaw?
As actual criminal defense attorneys know, judge Cannone has provided a generous amount of lead way on evidentiary issues when it comes to the defense, out of an abundance of caution. Not only has she done this in the Read case but in many others. It’s the reason why she is so well respected by the defense bar, including myself, in Massachusetts.
I have watched the motion hearings and don’t find her bias is any way. I think FKR people are just twisting it into what they want.
For instance?
@@Michaelcollin-wu2ng She is biased and has been from the beginning. The fact that she is not allowing the cause of death on the death certificate, specifically "Undetermined", in evidence shows that. There is NOTHING in the rules of evidence that prevents manner of death Undetermined to be allowed into evidence. Only Homicide, Accidental and Suicide have superior court rulings precluding these to be allowed into evidence. It is SHOCKING that she would not allow this into evidence. So you may respect a biased judge, who has a personal relationship with one of the "witnesses" in this case and refused to recuse herself, but people with higher standards of ethics do not. And that's just 2 examples of bias out of many, many more. She's be reassigned to civil court, yet she insisted on keeping this case. Wonder why. But I'm not worried. She'll be investigated once this case is over. And THAT I'm very much looking forward to. She can then huff and puff all she wants.
As a citizen, you have the right to redress your grievances with government. Feel free to contact the US attorney to query why the judge discarded a 3100 pages report from the FBI exonarating Karen Read? And why the FBI do not indict the real culprits?
Is any of the document online? Who authored it? FbI agent ______ ?
Well that makes one of you
The defense attys are saying that, the reports are not public. Not one person from the FBI came out and said anything about her being exonerated.
why does she breathe like that - she is going to be rough to listen to during this trial - she is so bias - its like this trial is such a bother to her
It's "bias𝗲𝗱."
This judge is keeping defense on a narrow path. I will be interested in how this unfolds at trial
Kudos to the patience of defense team. The judge needs oversight, who is in charge of her?
Nobody is in charge of the judge ding dong she’s the judge. KR can appeal if she doesn’t like the outcome - from prison.
This judge is obviously biased against the defendant... The FBI needs to step in!
They may need to, but they never will.
There is an appeal process if that is what is utilized.
The judges sighs, I felt every one. Why do they avoid submitting motions so often?
Also, NOW she is worried about the sound? That court room is not a Museum, and should be updated for todays court needs and reality!
She is so incompetent!
Probably will ask Mr. L to fue issues with the court room …😅
I want to v!
What does "fue" mean, and what does "v!" mean? Thank you?
This judge and the commonwealth of Massachusetts needs to come into the 21st century (which is already 3/4 over with) as far as audio visual presentation is concerned.
You’re math isn’t mathing
Mathing isn’t a word.
@@TJT92340 tell me you live under a rock without telling me, dumbass just dumb. No it’s not a word, it’s a saying.
The judge is spoonfeeding the prosecutor's arguments. That was particularly the case when talking about Proctor! She's biased! She knows the Albert family! She owns a seaside cottage near the Albert's, and they share the same beach! She lied under oath!
What did she lie about, not knowing them? Who did she lie to? Thank you.
She lied to the court, when she denied the motion to recuse herself. That's called perjury
@marie-francecsabai7625 thank you for the reply
Olivia Lambo Two fun facts: 1) Judge Cannone’s brother, John Prescott, represented Chris Albert as his attorney for his hit & run homicide back in 1994. 2) Judge Cannone’s popular nickname (in reference to this case), “Auntie Bev”, was given to her by “witness” Jen McCabe’s brother-in-law, Sean McCabe, when he threatened to bury the corpse of investigative journalist @DoctorTurtleboy
-who’s been covering and broke the story- under the “seaside cottage” of the Judge.
When asked if he/his family had a “line to Judge Cannone”, Sean McCabe stated: “Auntie Bev??? Whose seaside cottage do you think we're going to bury your corpse under?"
😂😂😂 which is clearly sarcasm. Ffs..
So their redacting wording on the death certificate? Wow. That’s bogus!
Right? Canoli bias.
So bogus.. it’s not like there’s a plethora of binding case law from the SJC that says the cause of death should be redacted from the death certificate in cases where the cause of death is disputed between the parties since this is a material issue of fact for the jury to decide. Leaving the cause of death on the death certificate prejudices the defendant since it could confuse the jury into thinking that they are not the one to decide the cause of death and to instead take the written words on the death certificate as to the cause of death as indisputable truth.
You online attorneys always give me a chuckle. If your legal scholar turtleboy said it’s bad, it must be .
I’d be interested in if it does prejudice the defense, as the coroner can be cross examined. I found it interesting. Either the CW believes their coroner and backs their findings or should have the coroner file an addendum and correction. Idk just my thoughts
@@Michaelcollin-wu2ng - Yet the ME listed the cause of death as unknown. And no, I do not think I’m an online attorney. Just think this is a strange thing to do overall. Jury is going to find out during cross that ME listed it as unknown regardless, so why redact it?
@@annm9589 nobody said anything about not believing the "coroner" (which is incorrect, btw the M.E. does an autopsy, not a coroner) there have been many cases that they redact it for the jury. It is not unheard of.
I am asking myself…how did this. Judge got into the bench?
Uffffff, worst of choices….
Mostly by having dinner parties with the right people, campaign contributions, and a law record that shows a high win score, which usually means you broker pleas that make you look favorable. It’s all bull s hyte
Into? Into the bench? Ffs.
Defense had a good argument about the blood draw and the judge is deferring. I feel like defense can’t gain any traction when she rules for CW now and defers ruling for defense. It will be interesting once in trial if this changes.
a friend told me the judge was loved and adored by all in highschool, what happened?!!!
Still Is
What happened is she is corrupt.
😂😂😂😂
All the judge best friends from top to bottom, are in on the cover-up and the killing of John O'Keefe! And she is trying very hard together with her district attorney Adam Lally, to prevent the truth is coming out and they all have to go to jail. Karen is innocent!
@@wendelavanbeurden3537 😂😂 😂 must be true, tb said so.
shes unprepared and unprofessional ,what a shame
I can’t this judge!
. Jesus. You don't just need to buy a vowel, you need an entire word.
She keeps interrupting, bias Judge
BIASED.
@@EC-dz3fb She also commented and said "How did the Judge get into the bench"? 😂😂 🤦♀️
@@Kaykay-nn8yd
😆😄!!!
(Perhaps more importantly ... how's the judge gonna get 𝗼𝘂𝘁 of it?!)
judge playing dumb and keeps interupting
Defense is acting weird.
Poor Karen Read 😢this woman has gone through hell I know she’s innocent PROCTOR Alberts Morrisey Lally Mello FBI
HAS GOT U BY THE BALLS COMMONWEALTH
Statements of fact are not opinions, DooLally!
Defense is way behind! They appear disorganized and calculated. Did they catch up by week 6?
Very bad day for Karen Read--
Omg she leads Lally on everything
Eeekkk, defense sound very shakey, they've fallen very short on many many points !
What a waste of taxpayers money. There’s far too much reasonable doubt in this case. Whether she’s innocent or guilty, I can’t see a jury convicting based off the evidence alone. Nevermind the lack of investigation into his death. This case is far too convoluted.
I see the opposite. She ran him over.
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired
Try to hit ANY object, in any direction in a Lexus 570. It’s impossible. The sensors on the bumper and the fenders see the object, calculate the time of deceleration, cuts the accelerator off, and applies the brakes.
I’ve tried it. I’ve backed mine at 15 mph, with a 50lb bag of PEI potatoes behind me. 10 attempts. Never got closer than 8” from the potatoes.
Hopefully they have Lexus testifying or accident reconstruction, etc that may bring this forward.
@@annm9589 They have those experts and they will testify during this trial even Adam Lally don't trust them as always.. ( he thinks he is the expert on everything, to hide the truth!)
@@fitzdawg821 she had the option to turn all of that off. You can do it manually on her vehicle. Maybe that explains why they upped the charges from manslaughter to murder?
Was aunt Bev laughing at the start?
Looks like the reality of the trial about to start Monday has got the defendant in reality now no more smiling and chatting and laughing and smirking smiles today 🩷 a man loss his life children family and his parents have loss a Son my condolences to his family 🤲🏻
We're aware! She smiles because she's innocent!
@@youngredsoxshe’s smiles because she’s a sociopath
@@BoundlessMillennial She smiles because she knows FBI has CW and dirty murderous cops by the balls.
@@nellyvieira9496 If they did, they would've come out without before now.
Karen has never been financially dependent on John, is highly educated and earned all her money as a university financial mathematics professor and was not married to him. They had been in a relationship before, but because she had to move far away for work, they decided to split up. When she returned, they fell in love again, now John had his nephew and niece (parents were both deceased). That wasn't a problem for Karen, she loved them and helped raise them. (Not every woman does that!) What many people don't know is that Karen has had a history of serious illnesses since the age of 25, including Crohn's disease (a whole section of her intestines was even removed), she also developed MS and sometime after her arrest it turned out that she also had a brain tumor too, so her lawyer Yannetti didn't even know if she would make it!
Karen is mentally very strong and therefore often comes across as a bit haughty, but that is because she is trying to right this enormous injustice that has be done to her, in the way she has been framed, trying to survive and show the world how it all really works with all the corruption there in Canton from top to bottom.
Because even the judge and the district attorney are 100% involved in it too, and that is very clear if you watched the days in court. As the truth slowly becomes clearer, she can finally laugh a little more. The fed follows everything (nearly right from the beginning) in the background and has long since proven with the help of their own experts that she did not do it and is therefore innocent.When you are treated like a criminal day and night by the judge (Auntie Bev for the real perpetrators) and her accomplice district attorney Adam Lally, you understand that she has that grinning smile and that she really no longer stands up for that judge (who is related to all those corrupt people.) She will be acquitted but I really hope real justice for John and Karen that the truly guilty will not escape their punishment, preferably everyone who helped make this happen! And I hope that she will be rewarded for the enormous financial costs she has had to incur, she has nothing left, lost her beloved children his niece and nephew too! Has no house, no car, no job because of all of them!
I reserve judgement on the judge and whether defendant is guilty or not. That is what the trial is for.
Judge just say no
Free Karen
Limited to…….
Adam Lally is very smart. If I were representing the defendant, I've have filed at least 20 pre-trial motions to have ADA Lally put in a full head-to-toe clown costume w/make up and wig for the duration of this trial. It's the only way to level the playing field, and even then, the defense is going to have their work cut out for them. I just cannot think of any other legal strategy that might give Ms. Read a fighting chance in front of a Norfolk Co. jury. Not a single one. God help us.
You're funny. Perhaps you're the one wearing the clown suit. This is going to be a ridiculously easy win for the defense. Lally doesn't need to wear a clown suit. He has already demonstrated what a colossal clown he is.
@@nellyvieira9496 You're a silly, silly goose.
Why does Karen read reminds me of Kate Chastain from below deck lol. Free Karen
The Judge is well-respected in MA and comes from a family of respected lawyers/Judges. She's fair. She may be a little out of breath, but that could be speaking closely in the mic, a technical sound issue, a health issue, or a little extra weight or stress. She has a nice soft tone speaking voice, in my opinion. She's covering many unresolved matters right before the trial and has a ton of logistics to figure out quickly. The Judge is doing exceptional for the number of issues still unresolved, with opening statements expected to start next week.
What else she ,Auntie Bev needs to see? Ohh she needs to hear Mr.L again with his BS…so bias!
If you're going to constantly use that word, at least use it correctly. PLEASE.
It's biased.
Not professional judge using the commonwealths first name basis.
It’s all about Bev. Stop your whining and heavy breathing and act professional Bev.
She sighs constantly
Maybe they could submit a motion when prodded
It's going to be painful to watch the Commonwealth's Undynamic Duo...
Read will be convicted on the facts of the case. Everything else is pure speculation.
Move on judge let them have their guy
Because she was pissed off and blackout drunk.
Unpopular opinion…. I hated Lally but now I just feel bad for him lol this isn’t going to go well for him and I feel like he is being used. Respectfully, he comes across as a push over and someone dirty cops could very easily manipulate.
This isn’t going well for him? Are you nuts, the defense has lost nearly every motion and gets dressed down almost daily. I can’t wait for sentencing.
Maybe Lally is a grower, not a shower.?🤔🤣
Bias??????????????? That is you Aunt Bev!!!!!!
🙄🤭
😂😂 🤷🏻♀️
What the fk is wrong with little’s voice 🤣🤣
This auntie Bev Disney World?
She could not have seen this….
Now she is an Interior Designer too?
Your Honor Mr.L, how can I serve you? Love Aunt Bev.
Ya know I have to say this Alberts McCabe Proctor all police officers 👮♀️ who were in the house 🏡 the day Higgins Brian Albert Chole dog Colin and everyone who knows the truth you’re cursed your Karma is black trust me
Lalaland!!!!!!!!
Who are you talking to? You get that this isn't the livestream, right?
@@EC-dz3fb😂😂😂 I just left you a response in regards to a different comment. It said..The lack of basic knowledge and common sense is sad. It seems that response will apply here , too. 😂
@@Kaykay-nn8yd
😄😆😄😆!!!
The courtroom was fine for this! There finding fault with everything !
Courtroom is issue with juror view. It’s valid concern imo.
@@annm9589well it’s been used for years! No one has complained before!
It was a valid concern.
Karen, why did you run over your cute bf?
Were you there
@@kellyross3072 The defense's theory is preposterous, untenable, and as we approach the trial, they're showing that they have mere mud to sling, though I don't doubt LE do coverup their misdeeds/criminality.
LUNCHBOX LALLY
Is Judge Auntie Bev also under Federal Investigation?
Paul O’Keefe. What’s his deal?
Auntie Bev hates Defense