Can we just take a moment to acknowledge how heartbreaking this is for his niece and nephew. Not only did they lose both parents ,now their uncle,who was their legal guardian 😢
Imagine finding your boyfriend on the lawn of another Boston Policeman’s and no one from inside the home comes outside to see what’s going on. No one leaving that party hours earlier noticed him either, over 6 foot tall man on top of maybe an inch or two of snow at that point.
They were invited in the house for drinks! People are too quick to judge! They have to know the whole story to make a judgement. She is bold and carefully presenting herself; while her body language is not coordinating with her words. She already said, she dated him in the past. He called her / message her as blast from the past. What if he wanted to leave her again? there wasn't anything substantial he found in her; she is all over him in those pictures. She took care of his niece and nephew. Those things can give her entitlement issues. she went on and blamed the entire police department for it. There is a simple rule when you go to party or dinner together, you leave together. In her madness, she may have hit him in the snow and left him there to die; later fabricated a plan to blame entire police department.
@@MineMeMineMeMineMe I agree with your statement. She 'allegedly' took care of the children. If this in fact happened - there's been (most likely) a mutually beneficial arrangement between both parties. From my pov, her body language describes her as a very attention hungry, domineering, vengeful individual. He seemed to be more of a subdued individual.
I don’t believe in body language to the extent that a couple of you seemingly do. There’s certain times it can be helpful, and many times is interesting. But I will tell you that there’s been times, For example, that I have shook my head no when I verbally said yes, or vice versa. And I was literally just talking out loud to myself. I do that a lot. If I saw someone do that I would be suspicious they were lying. But my case I was answering questions along with some video or some thing, and I thought they were going to ask the question in the opposite way which would’ve made my answer yes, but they ask the differently which meant to be truthful I had to say no. But if you all were watching my body language you would be convinced I would lying. I also think that people usually are mostly projecting confirmation bias when they look at body language. Maybe you’ve already made up your mind with other information you know about this case and so when you get new information it still doesn’t change your mind. I’ve done the same thing. That’s why they tell members of the jury not to State their opinion, because once you state your opinion it’s harder to change your mind later. Or maybe you know a woman or man, or the situation at hand, they remind you of some thing that happened in your past, so you’re more likely to be on one side or the other. And then subconsciously you look for ways to validate how you already felt either about this woman or the situation from your past. But people don’t realize they are doing it.
This video dosent even begin to touch on the corruption in this case. There is absolutely no way she could of done this by backing into him one time. The autopsy photos ALONE prove this. There was no DNA skin blood hair found on the Lexus if she caused that much damage to him There definitely would of been DNA and blood on the back of that car. This poor women is being accused for something she obviously didn't do. Free Karen Read!
Just because there’s broken plastic doesn’t mean it touched his skin. Plenty of documented cases where people get hit by cars and bruising, cuts and scraps under the clothing. If he was beaten his face has no broken nose, cheeks, jaw etc. Defensive wounds would be in his palms and fingers. He got hit then tumbled on pavement because of a belligerent drunk girlfriend.
@@ElleJ-kx4hu there’s lots of exculpatory evidence that’s been hidden! The DA is in cahoots with the crooked cops. This is not new and blatantly obvious.
@@ElleJ-kx4huthey’re still investigating. The last twitter update from FBI agent that I saw on twitter said as much. I’ve heard that they had an initial hearing where they made clear their experts opinions on both self phone data (google search) as well as manner of death. Judge ruled that the FBI trial and findings cannot be used in this trial.
I feel so bad for the O’Keefe family. The poor kids lost their parents and than their uncle. The parents lost their daughter and than their son. That is just horrible. The truth is coming out. Hopefully, the O’Keefe family can get justice.
@@Kapler1982 I’ve seen someone after a dog attack. Dogs bite and tear. They don’t attack with their claws. If it was a dog there would be punctures surrounded by bruising
I was Karen Read's hairdresser for several years. I can not believe that she is capable of hurting anyone. She's a sweet, kind, thoughtful, and generous woman. I am shocked to find out she's going through this. Karen, I'm praying for you! Maureen ❤
Have they asked you to be a character witness for her ? You should be. She needs all the help she can get. This case is so incredibly frustrating how important evidence was mishandled, thrown into red solo cups you drink in, put into stop and shop bags, and not into evidence marked bags. Someone could spend the rest of their life in jail for something they didn’t do. It’s just insane and sad that this is how they did their “investigation”
Every interview should begin with showing his autopsy photos & the Cellebrite data of a search by a “witness” of “Hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am. Why is the data from cellphone forensics NOT reliable in this case but is 100% in the Brian Walshe case?
The data shows it was searched at the time the body was found. That will be shown in court. The defence are making it up as they go. They are doing a trial by media.
The woman that got up early to "help Karen find John" (a family member of those involved that was in the house) submitted a google search to find out how long it takes for a human to die in the cold several hours BEFORE John was found dying in the cold. She also informed a friend about John's death prior to her "helping" Karen find John's body...
Yes! How did Julie Albert know at 4:55 am he died when his body wasn’t discovered until 6 am. It’s so obvious any comment on this saying she is guilty is either one of them or someone who just watched this interview and hasn’t heard of this case yet.
But didn't Karen call her to help her look for him around this same time? Does it not make sense that she would be google that then if they think he's out in the cold without a coat like Karen says? And why did Karen not go directly back to the house she dropped him off at? Does that make sense to you? And why would she need a couple of people to help her look for him? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."
@@Paul-cj1wb nope. Jen McCabe googled it at 2:27 am and Karen called her a little before 5 am. Also look at Julie Alberts police statement she told them she received a call from Jen McCabe at 4:55 am telling her that “Johnny was dying” the reason is because they did it and are framing Karen.
Lots missed. Autopsy photos showing it couldn't have happened by her car, the car in police custody with hardly a scratch on it and Jen McCabe googling "Hos long to die in cold" 4 hours before John's body was found Good job Karen #FreeKarenRead
And from whom do you have all this evidence from? The defense? And didn't Karen call this Jen McCabe to help her look for him? Would she not be googling that if they think he's out in the cold some place? And why would Karen call a couple of people to "help her look for him," around the neighborhood rather than she herself first going directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake." The injuries mentioned could have happened if a plow is out there plowing and the body is hidden by snow. A snow plow is very heavy and jagged from stones and other materials on roads and leaves scratches all over. Just look at a speed bump on a road that is regularly plowed and you can see them for yourself.
All pedestrian collision injuries on the Right side - swollen Right eyebrow, slice on Right eyelid, abrasions Right shoulder, abrasions Right arm, bruise on top of Right hand, abrasion Right side of knee. Broken whole piece of Right taillight. Cops got Right rattlesnake. You & your like can't picture any other pedestrian collision except being hit from the Front of a car meaning, with a bonnet that is low to the ground, so an impact to the legs with all manner of other injuries due to being flung or falling off the bonnet of the car. Yawn. It is nobody's fault that you also can't figure out how the back of John O’Keefe’s head slammed onto the edge of the concrete kerb which caused the severe skull fractures & then his brain slowly swelled while he froze to death. The marks on John’s right arm are Abrasions from blunt force trauma, blood cells only raise to the surface. No bleeding because there was no breakage of skin. Likely that John had tried to use his elbow at the last split second to push himself out of the way as he stood up due to picking up her glass of Vodka that he took off her lowlife ever foul-mouthed drunk ass. His head went forward, body twisted & he went straight back, head hit edge of cement curb & due to the snow that had started to fall not long before, the road & grass was icy & so, Slippery. Due to the frantic life saving measures by the paramedics at the scene, in the ambulance & at the hospital which included solution to warm the blood/body, the left eye swelled also & blue/black eyelids which is very typical & called raccoon eyes. FYI - that SUV was Not a sedan, it didn’t have a Trunk, the system of taillights are many, moulded plastic, higher set. The data from her ten ton Truck shows, she planted her foot to the metal Instantly doing 24.2 miles per hour for 62 feet. That car was fitted with a screen in front of her face, reversing camera & sensors. The beep beep beep was prevalent as she approached her boyfriend. It got faster when she didn't Stop. The data from her vehicle shows a sudden slight lessening of speed & the wheel turned slightly. Indicative of hitting a pedestrian. A demo was filmed using her car & those exact data entries & showing the brakes brought the car to an immediate stop on an icy road. She didn't slow, stop or even hesitate as the accelerator data Shows. N.B. for all the dumb bums I will explain something else in Simpleton terms - having the sensor in her car also means that when she slowly & very deliberately backed into John's car at 5.07 a.m., her drake face was also hearing Beep Beep Beep. Her right hand reached over to press a button, the auto brake assist that she switched Off. The Authentic ring camera video shows the piece of the taillight Missing as she drove off. A cop went to John's house at 8.22 a.m., to see if kids there alone. The video from his car shows, the Same piece missing. Karen Read is a very crafty female who thought she was The most attractive thing on the planet & believed in her demented mind, that All men should fall at her feet. She was lucky enough to be born a Psychopath so the killing of a human being was very Easy for her. Like any trial, separate the vegetable soup from the chicken pieces. It is Very clear that she is Guilty. There were Two grand jury investigations, the 2nd run by the Feds. And then, the case went to Trial. Obviously the grand jury members from both had intelligent minds, you're just a Nobody. Here’s how it goes - the more witnesses the prosecution had to put on the stand the More the trial drags out & so, the More work for her circus performers to do & so the Mega bucks that they get from Her. LOL. The best part about the trial is knowing that Read is Broke & she will Always be broke as John's niece & nephew will Sue that Monster to hell & back Next. I don't know how Paul contained himself having to watch that Thing enjoy herself very many of those days. Back at the beginning, Yanetti on the courthouse steps & the announcement for the TV cameras "it was an accident, she didn't mean to hit him". Then along came a little spider from the bright lights of LA Land & he saw Big dollars signs & a fable was born against all those at the after-party, against every serving police officer in the State & against all medical responders for 50 miles. The she-devil spent 1 million on a PR campaign to make a whole lot of numpties, cop haters & Ritas, into her turtle mutant cult members. Congrats. And BTW - as much as she laughed, smiled & smirked all through the trial, she is doing Same about You. It's 5.00 a.m., "Kerry Kerry Kerry" then she hung up because the play-acting was Meant to freak the hell out of that poor woman. It's about 5.05 a.m., she calls back "John's dead, I think he might have been hit by a plough". At about 6.10 a.m., "stop there he is, let me out this f##king car". She 'saw’ a body from the middle of the back seat as the 2 women in the front were looking either side & ahead for John when driving in the middle of a Blizzard, pitch black outside still, no streetlights for that section of road & the body was about 6 feet back from the kerb at the far left side area of a family's front yard & completely Covered in several inches of Snow. Amazing supernatural powers from that evil-eyed devil in a dress. I suppose you would defend that thing even if that body was Your child yeah?
@@cherylcampbell9369 Source the Authentic video from when she left John's house, the missing piece is Clearly seen. The same piece that Kerry saw when she was parked behind Read's car at Jen's house, only Read had stopped & packed snow down across the back of her car by then so Kerry could see only part of it. The same piece that Read was telling Jen about when both were still sitting in her car & That's why Kerry leant out her window to look. The same piece missing that Read showed them both when they were leaving John's house just before she made them take her to Fairview to 'discover' a body under 4-6 inches of Snow. The same piece missing when the cop went to John's house at 8.22 a.m., & parked not far behind her car & due to the cop-cam, that same piece missing is Clearly seen. How very telling that the footage Read deleted when she went back there with her father, was the section where she was showing Kerry & Jen that broken taillight, you know, that had the piece Missing. Her parents also had CCTV cameras & it was quite dark late afternoon when her car was being driven onto the tow truck. The light bulb was still intact & one can See the white light shining through due to the piece Missing. Got it yet? Chloe was rehomed because they moved to a condo and the dog was not allowed. This was before Karen and toilet turd concocted their conspiracies. BTW doggy doo, what I stated in reply to that person, is only a Fraction of what was used to have her Proven Guilty already. It is nobodies fault that a couple of jurors had the same 3 brain cells as numpties like yourself running around the public domain without a leash. The prosecution team will Make Sure that thing waddles off out the Back door next time & she sure won't be beaming with joy Then.
Watching the trial... definitely a police cover up. I think the cops got in to a fight.. something happened in the house.. and they tossed him out. you mean to tell me, not one FIRST RESPONDER in the house didn't notice him on the grass!!!????
@jane6989 YES, I absolutely think they'd leave him in their own yard. It would be way too hard to take him anywhere else, In their drunken state, they put him on the lawn. That way, they could say they had nothing to do with it. It obviously worked in their favor as no one investigated inside of the house.
Not saying she did it. But she is not being totally honest. Definitely lying about the amount of alcohol she consumed and who would leave their boyfriend/girlfriend , Aftee waiting ten minutes. Then go home and call them repeatedly. Would've just stayed there. And probably walked up to the house and said tell my boyfriend he better hurry up.
I think she knew she hit him and went home in a panic waited a few hours then called friends to help her “ find” him. She took them straight to the body! Otherwise she would have just gone home and passed out from all the alcohol. I think she’s very clever
@@StephSilva-qw1lm that would be a good conclusion to reach if it was for the evidence that shows that the injuries to his body are in no way consistent with getting hit by a car. In the trial right now the defense has an expert medical examiner who has done thousands of autopsies and he is going to testify that his injuries are in no way consistent with a car accident. We can speculate all we want but that is kind of a huge plot hole. Even before this I thought, if he was hit by a car you would expect he abdomen to be bruised, ribs broken, pelvis broken, legs broken or injuries, basically places where a bumper (which is the first point of contact when a car backs into something) would hit someone. Instead we see no injuries on his lower body or abdomen and an injury on his arm and head.
She didn’t “leave him”, the agreement was that he would text her when he got inside, he never texted her so she just left. Kind of different than straight up leaving someone. She didn’t go home and just start calling either, she called once the early hours of the morning came and she figured he should be back by then. She might be lying about the alchohol she drunk but why wouldn’t she? The alcohol is the only thing that causes some doubt in this situation but that’s only excluding all of the evidence that works in her favor and the medical examiner testifying that his injuries in no way correlate to a car accident.
There’s no way that you could possibly know that because you don’t know anything about accident reconstruction. I really find it laughable when random people say things like this when there’s LITERALLY NO WAY you can determine that from watching a video about a case.
@@DarkAngel71180 well I am in accident reconstruction and with the amount of snow that was on the street its physically impossible to leave those kinda marks on him with nothing wrong with her car, she would have some damage. We all saw the video of when she hit John's car that she had minimal damage. Those injuries on his arm are from Chloe
This video misses the most important piece of evidence. One of the people in the house that night googled “hos long to die in cold?” at 2:27am. Long before they should have been aware that anything was wrong. Also, the plow driver that night reports that he saw no body on the lawn that night and would have noticed if one was there. The prosecution’s case only sounds reasonable until you start digging into the details.
@@THEBIGLIE20 they do this because that is how Jen McCabe typed “How long to die in cold” to do her Google search at 227am several hours before John O’Keefe was found dead outside on Boston cop, Brian Albert’s front lawn. It was obviously a typo at the time but I think we all know exactly what she meant and that she was searching for this answer during the making of the plan to cover up the murder.
Additionally the prosecution will not hand over any evidence the defense is asking for! Where is the library video? Where are John’s clothes? Their unwillingness to give these things over assures they are hiding something! #freekarenread
They gave the library video and guess what was missing? Two minutes of the video somehow disappeared. The two minute time frame that Karen would have been driving by with a tail light that wasn’t broken yet and would prove her innocence. Absolutely absurd case. They are all going down though the Feds are was too involved now.
@@slaws2279it would show it being towed with brake light intact, which another video did but John Procter apparently broke tail light and scattered this at the scene because then poof it was discovered.
How is evidence of a crime on a front lawn with no motive or murder weapon NOT probable cause to search the residence? This is before Karen was even believed to be a suspect. How is a dead body on a front lawn not probable cause to search the residence? At 9am, the crime scene was still an open and active investigation - but the house wasn't searched? What? Why? How?
Especially since the people in the house were with him the night before and were all friends.. the cops that showed up that morning knew this because they’re in the friend group! Something doesn’t sit right about it!
@@dawnmills6755 please educate yourself before making a comment. The home was not searched. A conversation in the foyer with good boy Officer Lank lifelong friend is not due diligence in a murder investigation. The entire property was a crime scene, and was NOT treated as such. Witnesses were not separated, the scene was not secured, evidence was not preserved, interviews were not recorded, the house was not searched, the camera used to take the photos of the front lawn was lost, witnesses names were intentionally spelled wrong/left out of the police report, red solo cups were used to collect blood, a leaf blower was used to blow snow around…
Idk I know I’m being judgemental but she does not come off as being genuine and sincere. I think she had at least some small part in it if not the entire thing
This interview barely scratched the surface on the evidence that the defense has to support Karen's innocence. I can't wait to see justice served. #freekarenread
So he goes inside the apartment, she tries to call on his cell phone, he doesn’t answer and she drives home and goes to bed? This seems reasonable to you? This is so implausible as to be wholly unbelievable.
Question: So this house was a cop’s house. Not just any cop. A local hero. No security cameras? I mean his job was to bust drug gang members. No security cameras on his house?
@@sharonsower1912John was a very good friend he even helped other children he knew, sorry you missed .she was probably jealous of that also!!! Because of her persona in court I don't think she would not have made a good mother! It's all or nothing!
If she saw John walk inside Brian’s home, why would she wonder if she hit him or not? If Brian killed John, why would he dump his body right outside his house? What was his plan exactly?
@@RationalNon-conformistyeah but wouldn’t they try to move his body further from the house then? Like closer to the road? It doesn’t make sense to just leave his body basically at their own lawn
I would have to have the same questions as you but at the same time I feel this lady Jen helped her idk somethings seems off about them but i have no doubt Karen participated because she just lied and said she had 4 drinks but it was proven from footage it was 7-9. Also why say did i hit him ? The fact you have to ask yourself that is scary
I want to believe her, but why did she leave him there? If you go into a house and disappear I’m not stepping foot off of that property until I find my loved one.
@@pistolpete8231 He was 46 years old and he was invited in a bar to come over to Brian Alberts house but they didn't ask her explicitly, so Karen was not sure it was an extended invitation so that was the reason she drove off .. still hoping he called her to say he you are invited too so she was a bit frustrated about this too.. It's not nice to have to go home alone after an evening out!
She did not want John going into the house with Higgins in fear of him finding out she had indeed been hitting on him. They argued in the vehicle and John got out.. she kept moving the car forward away from the home and became increasingly agitated and concerned because he was going to go in anyways. She was pissed and reversed the car to go back towards to home to continue agruing with him to not go in and hit him.
N u wouldn't search that if your friend was missing in tge cold. Plz stop, that is tge dumbest comment I seen. N there's alot, I would, if my friend was missing n I knew w time I saw him last I would search that, any normal person would. Defense reaching at straws.
@pistolpete8231 did she Google search he is dead. No idiot, she searched how long so they know how long they have to find him before he dies. God think before you respond, n every good person out there would do the same.
@playarlz36 hey pea brain...take about 5 minutes to SLOWLY re-read what I wrote. I simply asked why she'd THINK he was dead in the 1st place to get the idea to make that google search. Where did I say "she googled he was dead"? I'm not sure if it's the ketamine or meth, but you're not as smart as you think. There are many holes in this case and all indications lead to a cover-up...keep banging that keyboard though.
Higgins, Albert destroy phones day before ordered to preserve, can’t recall numerous events, butt dial/answer each other. Jennifer McCabe butt dials O’Keefe 6 times and butt cancels before vmail. What a shady town. Video missing of when her LX 570 arrived at police department? Please
Because the FBI has stepped in to assist Canton and State Police in the investigation and they are analyzing the evidence before it’s turned over to Read’s defense.
@@Q-ZOO this is 💯 not true. They haven’t stepped in to “help” them investigate. The FBI stepped in to investigate them and their corruption. Why would the FBI be investigating the same crime the MA state police is already investigating? Even if Karen Read did hit John with her car- and she didn’t- this wouldn’t be in FBI jurisdiction. But police and government corruption would be! 💡
1 of the 4 things they turned in was altered as well. A video with 2 minutes randomly deleted midway through. They are pulling fingernails to make her look guilty.
The only one who was angry with him that night was Karen Read. The only one with a motive was Karen Read. She admitting to hitting him and we see her speed off.
The fact that the defense is the one fighting for all the evidence to be on the table speaks volumes. I knew Karen was innocent as soon as I saw that someone in the house Googled " how long to die in cold" at 227 am. John wasn't found until 6 am
Where are you getting this info that someone googled that at 227am? Where is that an actual fact. I would love to know so I can see it. Not from an internet conspiracy theorist, but from actual phone or google record that can be admitted into evidence.
It isn’t a fact that she did it at 2:27. You are just parroting what Turtleboy says. What the prosecution believes is that the browser session was opened at 2:27 and never closed until after she searched it at around 6am.
This was a great interview but so many important details were missed! The people inside the house googled “hos long to die on cold”, the missing library footage, the location of his body…so many things!
@@estrella5935ding, ding, ding. JC has been proven to be a mouthpiece for the prosecution. If the state has a poor enough case to enlist her, they should be charged!!!!
Have doubts? Just google the autopsy pics. Anyone can see from the autopsy pics that an SUV did not cause the injuries to John''s body. He has dog bites and scratches to his arm! Karen is 100% Innocent!!
I’ve watched the trial from the beginning. This entire thing reeks of a cover up to me. The Alberts know way more than they are saying, & the “investigation” was disastrous from the beginning. My heart breaks for the O’Keefe’s. 💔
@@EC-iy7js I have too, the defence had done a good job of using the cop and family as scape goats!!! They just go out beat John up, For what reason!!!??? He helped them with their children, they cry, they are sitting right near Reed! Wonder how painful that is!! She's a CONIVER, SHE HAS NOT SHED 1 TEAR! EVEN LOOKING AT JOHN'S AUTOPSY, SHE LOVED HIM?????
@@pennicochrane8886 it's not for you to say she never cried over this. Attorneys tell their clients to be stoic in court. You don't see her when she's not in court. How do you explain John's apple health watch saying he climbed up and down stairs during the time he was supposedly dead already? Why did they re-cement their basement, ditch the dog, sell their house? Why are they doing google searches about someone dying out in the snow from that house in the middle of the night? Why did the expert say a car couldn't have caused those injuries he had? The dog bites/scratches? The manner of death was undetermined. This evidence creates a lot of reasonable doubt in my opinion. The cops beat him up for what reason? drunkenness makes you do stupid things. That's why. And you only know what you've seen on CCTV about their interactions with John, and not anything else. She didn't kill him
@@pennicochrane8886you're projecting a lot of your own weird problems onto Karen. so, who is it in your life was it that she reminds you of? You're salivating and it's weird, lady.
@@Littleangel_-jp4xb Hi Karen, you should know that not Everybody slurped down your dirty Kool Aid. Aww. BTW - you have Already been Proven Guilty in a court of Law again. It's nobodies fault that a couple of jurors at trial were turleboy mutants who couldn't even work out that everything You have just repeated again, was Proven to be Incorrect. The prosecution will make Sure that you waddle off straight out the Back door next time & you Won't be beaming from ear to ear Then.
Also ur plow truck driver didn’t see his body there when he 1st plowed the St. John had bite marks on his arm from their dog, his cell phone pinged in the house going upstairs and down stairs and at 230am someone from inside the house googled- how long does it take to die in the snow
Plow trucks are very bumpy. I’ve been in one, and I never would have noticed a black object in a snow bank. People need to stop speaking on subjects they’re uninformed about.
If she's lying, she's a psycho. If she's telling the truth then the real culprits are idiots. Why dump the body of your murder victim outside your home?
@@RationalNon-conformist- well not ten feet from the house they were partying in!! But being it was a house full of cops you would think they could come up with a better conspiracy than that!
If you're not going to tell the whole story, why bother. State is wasting their time trying to convince the court of Karen's guilt, meanwhile the real murderer is off living life. I pray Karen gets her life back soon and that justice will be served for those actually responsible.
The cop already sold jis house , hus his assets, ready to go ""ON THE LAMB WITH ALL HIS BAGS OF DOPE HE GOT 4 FREE ,RAIDING GANG DEALERS.. THE SISTER IN LAW FRAMED HER WITH THE TAILIGHT AND GLASS EVIDENCE.. TJATS Y SHE WENT OVER TO HIS HOUSR.. KAREN WAS AT HIS JOUSE BCUZ HE DIDNT RESPOND TO Baby SITTER, so karen went ovrr there to relieve the sitter with the kids... after she hot thrm ready and off yo school, thoseb2 lying beatches showed up.. to frame her with evudense and tell cops that she said/ did things, to get the story rolling... tjst womanvwas protecting her husband and brother in law... karen said they r all family..
The dog is in Vermont and NIcole Albert testified that she could give them the info (owner's name, address, etc.) if anyone wanted it. They (Alberts) aren't trying to hide it. They fixed up the basement because they were going to sell the house and the basement had taken in water many times and needed new flooring. They met with a real estate agent in November of '21, just two months *before* the incident, because they were planning to sell.
00:35 look at that arm and tell me a Lexus SUV did that. It didn’t. It was a German Shepherd who lived inside the house until they got rid of her afterwards.
@@mainejournalnews8737 that was only models produced in the 90’s. The modern day versions have elected to no longer have that commonly overlooked feature.
Because she probably wondered my God was I so drunk that I like lost it last night? She was hysterical and in that moment that's why when you're hysterical you are never reasonable. The fact is the FBI has already confirmed his injuries are not from a car or an suv. His injuries are two black eyes, cut to the nose, blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and dog attack lacerations all over his arm. He went in that home and never came out alive
Remember, she saw him approaching the door and then she left. He did not go inside yet so it's possible he could have walked back out towards her and while she was backing up to leave hit him. But she didn't know I'm just saying to answer your question this is her line of thinking while in hysterics and just finding her beloved murdered
If you watch the trial, she had a texting cheating relationship with one of the men in the house, which also explains why she didn't want to enter the house, and encouraged John to also not go " why are we going there, are we welcome" etc. She likely said, I caused this, because she was in an emotional affair with a man inside of that house.
My son was killed by a drunk driver. Since when did we start supporting and cheering for people who delibrately get behind the wheel of a car, drunk off their ass, without a care in the world. So drunk she didn't know what the hell she'd done. If she is going to lie about how many drinks she had... what else is she lying about. Drunks always lie about how much they have had to drink. God! It just makes me so mad! I miss my son. 💔
I think that drink limit on Read is here say. There was no blood test on Karen Read. Your perception is on information that was never confirmed. You’re ok with that? Was your son’s killer checked for this? If so, that is why you know. Don’t take your personal incident and plaster it on this one. You have no idea what the truth is here.
You haven’t looked at all at the facts of this case. This couldn’t be further from the truth and is completely inaccurate…I suggest you watch the trial…
I agree about the drunk driving…it is so irresponsible and can endanger others lives as well as their own. Nothing good happens with excessive drinking. I’m so sorry about your son. Drunk driving is horrible!
Agreed on drunk driving but doesn't make her a murderer. I am so sorry about your son. But please don't let that be a veil to let you not see the truth of this obvious cover up.
Interesting how she said she admired the fact he took in his niece/nephew however evidence/text messages from the most recent witness does not in any way come off as admirable. Those poor children will feel they are a burden due to the unnecessary and shameful remarks she made regarding John’s custody of them. That was certainly a turning point for me.
WOW so his sister, and her husband passed away. The children had both parents die. So he steps up and becomes their adopted father... and then he dies. Those poor kids. Both of my parents died in my late teens, could not imagine dealing with that as a child.
Why would she ask if she hit him if she saw him go into the house? Sorry, go up to the house, not in. B’cuz she was looking at her phone. Why would she leave him after waiting for 10 minutes? They must’ve killed him immediately. Her story doesn’t make any sense.
She hit him so hard that he ended up in the yard and the only damage was a broken BACK tail light? He had scratches on one arm, two black eyes , and a fractured skull. All from a woman backing up and a broken tail light? The prosecution is never going to get past the house not being searched.
Karen: "I had told them I cracked my taillight" also Karen "I hit something with my car but I didn't look at the damage." Karen: "I saw John at the door." Also Karen: "I thought I might have unwittingly incapacitated him." Karen: **Has 9 vodkas and lime, knows she is on video doing so, knows the Commonwealth has her BAC level from the next morning** Also Karen: "I had four (drinks.)" Karen: "I thought I could have unwittingly incapacitated him." Interviewer: "Is it possible you hit him?: Also Karen" "No not possible."
Apparently you haven't been paying attention to the case. She hit John's car backing out of the driveway. There's video that proves it. She never said she had 9 drinks and they absolutely do not have her on video drinking nine drinks you just made that up 😂 BAC level of .13 % is like 4 drinks if that If you think she's guilty you are either ignorant or related to them.
@@Alienspecies635 She 'tapped' John's car in the d'way--no way in hell it would have broken her taillight. She backed into his car intentionally, so she would have an alibi to explain her busted taillight. Some of y'all are so myopic that it's sad.
She is very lucky to be able to afford these amazing attorneys. If she had a public defender, she would be in jail for life. So sad that in this country, an innocent person has to go broke to defend themselves in a case in which they are innocent. She needs to sue the Albert guy for wrongful death.
She is so guilty, No one could could see the Officer in the snow, logical, no fighting in the house!! Calling all those people proved nothing. Some happened from the bar to the house between the 2 of them. Can't stand mouth, she also snear. GUILTY!
@pennicochrane8886 lol wait until the defense brings in all the evidence FROM THE FBI who has been investigating the frame job by dirty cops and MSP for over 2 years.
@@pennicochrane8886 Any chance we can explain how he got a black eye....from being hit on his arm by her car, at what would be less than 10 miles per hour?
Why we're the marks on his arms not mentioned more? And then insinuated the glass theory again & brought up? Where is Chloe the dog? Why was the house sold so quickly? Why were so many of these questions not asked? And why was Proctor not mentioned making up lies? We need to know!!!
Why is all evidence pointing to her and people are ignoring it. Trying to find reasons of other instead of looking at the facts. Not fairy stories from a defence team. She said twice she hit him. She asked can someone google how long it takes someone to die in cold weather. That is why the search is there. The defence aren’t going to tell you that now are they. She changed her story multiple times. She’s full on with lies.
a library with 24 hour survilenace for decades, stops working for 2 mins when this care drives by and it got deleted ................... forget the text, the dog, house sold, HOLY COW
This is an eye opener of how cops can look like the good guys but be corrupt. The wounds on him speak volumes. It screams beat up not hit by a car. The sister in law googled “how long does it take to die in the snow” Brian lied on stand and was caught in lies. He wasn’t making sense. An innocent person at first feels guilty that’s why she thought she hit him with her car while drunk. But realized that wasn’t the case. After the fight got out of hand and he was beaten to death, They knew she was drunk so they made it look like she hit him with her car. She was framed. And I know she’ll be set free.
They were all friends!!! There is absolutely no reason for them to kill him! The defence is doing a good job of convincing you and others. She is Shrewd and a tough cookie! He has nothing rlse
Why wouldn't she just assume that he stayed there, rather than instantly thinking he's out in the storm and why did she recruit 2 witnesses before just going back to the drop off point and knocking on their door?
4:14 I honestly don’t understand why she would get up in the pitch dark during a blizzard to drive around looking for John… as far as she knew he was at Brian Albert’s house, probably got totally shitfaced and passed out on a couch… why would she think anything else? Why would she be driving around looking for him in a blizzard? That doesn’t make any sense. She knew she had dropped him off at a party with a fellow police officer that John greatly admired - she should have assumed John had the night of his life hanging out with his hero getting drunk and passing out…..
Because she called him and he didn’t answer. She was worried. Moreover she dropped him off around 12am, late but acceptable for an after party. She woke up having not heard from him at all around 3am, excessively late to still be at someone’s house-these are 40+ year olds not frat kids.
How did she expect him to get home? She said that she waited while he walked up to a side door and because he didn’t call her she burn off and went home. They were supposed to be going over there together that doesn’t make sense. You can get all scuffed up from falling down on the ground, I have scars to prove it. If you hit with a car, you can get scratched up by the ground, depending on how it hits you yeah you can mess up your face. I have seen it. Her whole story doesn’t make sense and I just started following the trial.
@@TwistedTalesofTrueCrimethey live less than 3miles from the house. He’s a grownup, I’m sure she assumed he’d Uber or get a ride. I’d never expect my grown ass man to spend the night at another persons house when we live right down the street. Also he was found on the grass. She drives a huge Lexus SUV, he had no mid body damage, his eyes were blacked, swollen, knuckles bruised, a gash in the top of his head and his arm had not abrasions but deep cuts/marks…have you seen the scene? No way she hit him and caused those injuries on a man over 6ft tall with that car in that location…impossible
@@DamnitDana I was unaware of all those bruises. Especially on his knuckles this strange. I would expect bruises maybe on one side and if he kind of rolled over or something like that. I can see someone being hit and then crawling to the side, but those bruises are questionable. Especially the location. I’m going to continue to observe the trial. I’m glad that I had no real exposure before this. That way I can assess it from fresh eyes. Thank you for sharing.
At around the 4:30 mark, she admits she went out searching for John alone before calling Jen and Kerry. She also admits she showed the women the tail light. She then says she may have incapacitated him unwitting somehow and in his drunkenness...passed out...that's not even a clear sentence. She is guilty by this interview alone.
and there’s conveniently missing library footage from their camera, his found hat has only been photographed, but never added into evidence, the Canton PD initial reports written on the very same day, had the initial crime scene pic replaced with the pic AFTER the taillight piece was planted on top of snow, and Brian Albert’s phone number was replaced/changed from the first report to the second altered report. Let’s not forget Jen McCabe’s 2:27 am search…”hos long to die in cold” either.
Despite the fact that alot of detailed pieces are missing, I think it's a good interview for her. Reality is.... it's not going to matter. The driveway footage paired with prosecution statements exonerates her and proves police corruption.
Let me share ER experience from a Trauma Level 1 hospital. Head trauma looks exactly like the autopsy photo, especially the bulging eyes. Remember, the hand would fracture long before the skull and this patient/victim had multiple skull fractures. That requires trauma and more force than that which occurs in a professional fight. This is indicative of a blunt force trauma head injury consistent with being struck by a vehicle and the secondary impact of the head striking the ground with coup-recoup movement of the brain/trauma and not a fist. Had it been a fight there would have been other obvious bruising. If you are struck by a vehicle at a slow speed (I.e. backed into) it will cause you to fall and strike the back of your head (occipital lobe) which will result in head trauma which will look like bulging/swollen eyes, bleeding from the orfaces of the mouth and nose and possibly eyes, GCS 3 neuro. You can not observe fractures and breaks or skeletal injuries and nobody is gonna image a dead patient to find them. So think about this-a car slowly backs into him, strikes perhaps his orbital/eyebrow region, he falls back onto his head and is knocked unconscious and dies of the elements/hypothermia. It is VERY possible without other observable injuries. If he has been hit at 30 MPH would this look different? Of course. When we get a patient in the trauma bay, l'm concerned with life-sustaining or saving measurements. Not all internal trauma (in fact, most) is visible externally or overtly. Additionally, remember the ER physician stated his forearm had multiple superficial abrasions. These are to the epidermis not penetrating which are extremely shallow (think fingernail scratch), not a K9. It is frustrating when people with no knowledge of how a TBI presents/looks jump to the conclusion he just looks like he was beat
The prosecution’s case is incoherent. It’s time for them to give it up and be prosecuted themselves. Everyone knows Karen is innocent. Anyone saying otherwise hasn’t been paying attention or is complicit. His injuries don’t match the prosecutions lie that he was hit by a car. Innocent people don’t replace their basement floors, abruptly sell their family home for $50k less than value during a sellers market, get rid of their dog and try to retire early. Innocent people come outside their house to see what’s going on when there is a dead body on their lawn. It is inexcusable that house wasn’t secured and investigated- IT WAS THE CRIME SCENE. Heads need to roll, and 💯 not Karen’s!!
@@dawnmills6755 if you have to ask then you haven’t done any research into this case. What’s absurd is commenting things that are actually established facts are absurd theories. Do some research lady. Hope you and your loved ones never get framed for a murder you didn’t commit and have uninformed people celebrate it bc they can’t be bothered to learn.
@@dawnmills6755 Who said it was the Albert's? It could have been Higgins. Why do half the witnesses not remember his jeep there, but when questioned remember every little detail about Karen Reads vehicle. It could have been an unfortunate accident where a drunken fight ended up in a death, by anyone in the house. It could of been Colin also. Why did nobody mention that he was in the house until many months after? Why did they not interview half the people at the house that night until the FBI started investigating the investigation?
So according to her, he goes into the friend's house to confirm if they are welcome or not, she waits 10 minutes in the car, never says she texted or called him while waiting there, gets pissed off, and drives back to their own house. But then says she "continued calling him," then falls asleep around 1:30am, wakes just before 5am, and starts to look for him canvasing the neighborhood. What??? She didn't go directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? That makes zero sense. That's the first thing anyone would do. She looks like a very mean person with a nasty temper. She was clearly angry that night to just leave in a huff. Hmmm, there's something fishy about her story. And has she taken and passed a lie detector test? Or has she refused? Reportedly, this McCabe lady took a lie detector test as to her testimony and passed. Has Karen? And if not, why not?
Right. Why would a grown drunk woman come back to look for her drunk bf cop who is at the home of friends who are also cops? One would assume he slept on the sofa. He’s a grown man, he’ll call if he needs a ride.
Ignorant. Have you watched the trial? Have you heard the last 2 witnesses? John was not hit by a vehicle. It's been proven by physics and engineers who have been hired by the DOJ. Not possible!!
Theres no excuse for leaving him! She doesn't even cry when speaking about him at its very recent. I hope his "family" deal with her! What's the penalty for treason?????
Def set up.i think he was hurt in that house and placed outside,was the house ever searched or sprayed for blood splatter.poor kids have been through hell
@@barbaramay1866 This is the 2nd time this has happened. As soon as this is over they're gonna move onto the next case where that young pregnant girl that hung herself on a door knob was a minor having sex with the 2 cop brothers.
Another theory floating around (armchair detectives only, that I know of) is that there may have been a fight in the house, & that John was trying to leave on his own & simply didn't make it very far. Meaning, someone broke it up- possibly saying he ought to just go now or whatever- so John took off injured on foot, possibly passed out/fell down on the spot at corner of yard. If only a couple people inside knew what happened- such as a fight in the basement, for instance- then it would have been easy to keep it quiet, whether they knew he had fallen down outside, or even if they thought he was trying to walk home from there. They were all admittedly intoxicated, which skews people's judgement, actions, recollection, etc. Would also potentially explain the 2:27 am google search for how long it takes to die in the cold, & why nobody else (supposedly) saw him out there, or claims not to have. Just another theory, not my opinion~ too many missing connections & details to weigh in on it, personally. Really bizarre & scary~ most of all for the innocent children involved. My heart hurts terribly for his neice & nephew, they were just getting comfortable again after losing their mom & dad. They have suffered a whole lot of loss~ three parents basically, four if we count Karen, who had also become close to them at that point. They also have no clear accounting of what happened to their Uncle John that night, & they deserve justice as much as John O'Keefe does. Praying for all of the above, praying for Karen regardless of her involvement or not, and for all family members affected. Please Lord~ shine light on the entire, actual truth and cover the hurting with Your peace. They need You, we all need You.
Honestly this interview makes it seem like Karen Read did it. However, they are leaving out A LOT of important information that show that she is indeed being used in a cover up.
What is nuts is the idea that cops conspired to kill a fellow cop and drag his body outside all to frame her. She was drunk and accidently hit him and drove off. MANSLAUGHTER!!
And that's how he got a black eye and abrasions over his face? how about the deleted search about "dying in the cold" at 2AM. Also Jen seems to have been up that whole night, after drinking.
Thats how his watch recorded him descending steps, that macabe woman googling at 2:27 am hrs before the body found "how long does it take to die in the cold". Also him having dog bites and the dog is missing, the basement that his watch recorded him descending remodeled without ever being processed and the home sold, the officer in that house a boxer explaining his eyes, the autopsy not concluding a car with barely a scratch on it killed him, video of her barely hitting his car on way to search for him and shows that tiny piece missing as she goes out o'keefs driveway.
Do your homework!!!!!! There are a ton of discrepancies!!!!! She is innocent. There is DEFINITELY a coverup going on protecting the people responsible.
She needs to soften up a little, rather than be angry and attack…currently the way she communicates is scary…and gives the impression that if you mess with her she’ll kill you. Does not work in her favor
Wouldn't you be pissed if the entire police force is against you and you know that you didn't do anything it's an injustice I'm upset about it I'm not even her
If you and your family had to live in hell for 27 months, I bet you’d be furious! How frustrating this must be for her, not to mention her losses. Karen never uses it as an excuse & rarely mention it, but she has MS which could affect her speech, facial expressions, gait, etc. Have some compassion!
Why did Jen McCabe Google "How long to die in cold" at 2:27AM when no one knew John was missing (supposedly), and he (supposedly) never went into the house?
Let’s wait for the proof of when that was googled and by whom - at least if the time is not accurate, it could have been googled to work out how long he’d been lying there before being ‘found’ ….
Why you ask. ? Good question. Many witnesses have stated that Karen Read said to them, someone search how long does it take etc. this is while she is on top of the body. You’ll actually see that this is the fact of the matter. There’s a lot of made up garbage coming from her team. They have support so they are going with it. She admits to hitting him twice in the early stages. She admits after that to not remembering anything because she was too drunk. Now she remembers everything haha. Yeah right. Psycho woman
Forensic scientists confirmed in court that a phone tab was left open at 2:27AM and JM opened that tab again around 6am to do that search. They proved with proof JM did not make this search at 2:27AM
I’m glad this story is finally getting national attention since locally it is getting nothing from anybody but turtle boy. I do think they left the key points like what appears to be dog scratches and bites on John’s arm. How Brian Albert lost the dog soon after, sold his house at a $50,000 loss right after & how Jennifer McCabe googled how long to die in the cold. Hopefully more to come on a later show,
Why would she go out looking for him if she thought he was at his friends house? That doesn’t make any sense, she drove over there to see if she really did kill him, then had to play the “omg what happened”? Game
She woke up at 5 call her friends looking for John who does that ? He’s not a kid he could crush at the friends house, why she was so worried about him ? Because She’s left him to die after hitting him and she knows it!!!
I’m watching the trial now, and John Okeefe was not actually friends with the Alberts. Which is why Karen was confused about going to their house after leaving the bar
JUST GOOGLE THE AUTOPSY PICTURES! Those Knuckle wounds were the Exact Same as mines whenever I got into a fight from 16-25 yrs old…Those are Defense Wounds!
Right! His injuries were to his head and arm only. He didn't have any injuries on his chest, stomach, hips, thighs, lower legs, or on his feet. No way he was hit by a vehicle!
6:33 she says “ No! Not possible!” When asked if she could have hit him… but yet had just said she asked that herself! She had clearly asked “ Did I hit him?” So why the emphatic no when Matt asked her?
Its nervous mutterings of someone that just found their loved one dead and she was also drunk. The evidence speaks for itself and if you can't see that then you are just as horrible as the ones covering his unfortunate murder.
Because Jen put an earworm in her mind, and Karen was in shock and desperately trying to make sense of how it happened. Most people don't immediately jump to "his friends murdered him and dumped his body"; they think it must have been a horrible accident first even if it doesn't make sense.
When will the prosecution stop stalling and turn over and allow defense to test the 50+ pieces of evidence? Why doesn’t the defense have the original (not amended) death certificate? His hat? Photos of the scene at 6am?(None taken?) Why was the ONLY first responder to be interviewed a family friend of the Alberts? How did the 2-3 minutes of the Canton Library’s video that would show Karen driving home without a cracked taillight be the only portion deleted? Why weren’t neighbors in the other direction asked for ring camera footage?
After reading all of the case material presented so far, there is no chance this goes to trial. All of the prosecution's witnesses (LEO and otherwise) will be pleading the 5th.
@@RationalNon-conformist I didn’t say anything about “how she speaks”, but her words absolutely matter!! She’s told several different stories, she’s lied over and over again and anyone can see that she’s lying in that interview! Now we know she was lying because her own statements have completely contradicted her stories of what happened that night. So maybe you should learn how to read moron. Thank god you’re not on a jury 😂 because you can’t even comprehend a sentence
@@RationalNon-conformist Ps I don’t have feelings about Karen Read, I don’t even know her. But what I am going off is her multiple different stories, her behavior, the hard evidence against her and the multiple witnesses who were actually there that night! Shes a guilty bitch
This is completely irrational - A cover-up with multiple law enforcement agencies involved and dozens of officers involved? Seriously? The officers investigating the case didn't know John or the people inside that house. But somehow in the few hours after he was killed, they were able to persuade unknown investigatirs to cover this up??? And how did she go from him not being home to looking around in the snow? I don't think that I would jump to that conclusion - I would assume he's with someone somewhere in their house sleeping it off. You would think of who he can be with or whose house and how he got there. She knows she hit him - she knew and that's why she knew to look for him outside in the snow, otherwise she ou would call everyone and go to everyone homes, you wouldn't think of searching outside until later. And...why would the people inside the house have confronted him as soon as he entered the home? This defense is one of the most ridiculous I've heard. She hit him, she even even admitted to women she was with when she allegedly wondered out loud if she hit him. Again...why would she even think of saying she hit him if she hadn't hit him. That wouldn't have been a question in her mind
Dozens of officers involved? There was less than a half dozen that processed the scene, and they all knew who's house it was, and many of them knew who the victim was. As for actually processing the crime scene they did a completely despicable job. Also worth noting the only evidence they found after all the officers searched the area that day was a peice of a clear pint glass. It wasn't until days later an officer happened to be driving by and saw his missing shoe, his missing hat, and over 40 pieces of red taillight. How do 6 police officers search an area and come up with just a piece of glass, but not all the other things which would be easily seen in contrast with the snow?
@@dawnmills6755 Don't you wish all murders had such a competent, professional, and non-biased investigators?! Can't see over 40 pieces of red tail light in white snow, but can find it in the grass days later, under where his body would have been. She must of hit him so hard that the tail light fragments when right through him without causing any exit wounds! Incredible! You are awfully dense my friend 🤣
You kind of made a contradiction, if she was drunk and doesn’t remember, she definitely is filled with regret! Because she is sober now! She’s pissed! She cannot even grieve properly! I’d be pissed! And normally you don’t have defendants speak to the public. Also, we don’t know how many drinks she has had, pure speculation, they were also bar hopping, it wasn’t like the bartender at one bar counted the drinks, because she was BAR HOPPING. She is making sure Justice is served.
@@JAJJABLOG No, it's you who are making contradictory statements. She "is filled with regret" and "she is pissed!" If she was BAR HOPPING, she had A LOT OF DRINKS! Probably to avoid being cut off.
@@priscillamichel4797very true. My some died in 2017. For years I couldn’t even talk about him without falling apart. Now, I’ve trained myself to block out all thoughts and emotions. People are so ridiculous judging other based only on their reactions. We are all different!!
Can we just take a moment to acknowledge how heartbreaking this is for his niece and nephew. Not only did they lose both parents ,now their uncle,who was their legal guardian 😢
Yes...por kids. Seems like there's a curse in their lives
And now also their uncle's girlfriend in jail and she was also a parental figure to the kids
@@m.g.7828she’s not in jail she’s been out on bond
@@Tammy_26Irwin accused of murdering their uncle, just as traumatic
Wow! She opened up the worms in her drunken life and Jealousy including her having slept with his friend!!
Imagine finding your boyfriend on the lawn of another Boston Policeman’s and no one from inside the home comes outside to see what’s going on. No one leaving that party hours earlier noticed him either, over 6 foot tall man on top of maybe an inch or two of snow at that point.
Exactly.
They were invited in the house for drinks!
People are too quick to judge! They have to know the whole story to make a judgement.
She is bold and carefully presenting herself; while her body language is not coordinating with her words.
She already said, she dated him in the past. He called her / message her as blast from the past.
What if he wanted to leave her again? there wasn't anything substantial he found in her; she is all over him in those pictures. She took care of his niece and nephew. Those things can give her entitlement issues. she went on and blamed the entire police department for it.
There is a simple rule when you go to party or dinner together, you leave together. In her madness, she may have hit him in the snow and left him there to die; later fabricated a plan to blame entire police department.
That is suspicious
@@MineMeMineMeMineMe I agree with your statement. She 'allegedly' took care of the children. If this in fact happened - there's been (most likely) a mutually beneficial arrangement between both parties. From my pov, her body language describes her as a very attention hungry, domineering, vengeful individual. He seemed to be more of a subdued individual.
I don’t believe in body language to the extent that a couple of you seemingly do. There’s certain times it can be helpful, and many times is interesting. But I will tell you that there’s been times, For example, that I have shook my head no when I verbally said yes, or vice versa. And I was literally just talking out loud to myself. I do that a lot. If I saw someone do that I would be suspicious they were lying. But my case I was answering questions along with some video or some thing, and I thought they were going to ask the question in the opposite way which would’ve made my answer yes, but they ask the differently which meant to be truthful I had to say no. But if you all were watching my body language you would be convinced I would lying.
I also think that people usually are mostly projecting confirmation bias when they look at body language. Maybe you’ve already made up your mind with other information you know about this case and so when you get new information it still doesn’t change your mind. I’ve done the same thing. That’s why they tell members of the jury not to State their opinion, because once you state your opinion it’s harder to change your mind later. Or maybe you know a woman or man, or the situation at hand, they remind you of some thing that happened in your past, so you’re more likely to be on one side or the other. And then subconsciously you look for ways to validate how you already felt either about this woman or the situation from your past. But people don’t realize they are doing it.
Those poor kids lost their mother and father and then lost another caregiver, their uncle. So much trauma at such a young age 😢
Good point.
Truly horrible and so very sad :(
They lost Read too who was helping raise them and were told the person who was stepping in, did the unthinkable
The local prosecutor in this case sounds more like a defense attorney for other parties involved that night. Totally inappropriate.
How so? Because he’s doing his job arguing the evidence does not support Karen Reads creative defense stories?
@@cateellington4081 he hasnt done that at all. are you handicapped
He's also trying to shield them with office Victim's Advocate. They are witnessess.
Witnesses to what though?
@@cateellington4081 His "unprecedented" statement had no less than 5 outright lies and 3 completely inappropriate statements.
This video dosent even begin to touch on the corruption in this case. There is absolutely no way she could of done this by backing into him one time.
The autopsy photos ALONE prove this. There was no DNA skin blood hair found on the Lexus if she caused that much damage to him There definitely would of been DNA and blood on the back of that car. This poor women is being accused for something she obviously didn't do.
Free Karen Read!
Just because there’s broken plastic doesn’t mean it touched his skin. Plenty of documented cases where people get hit by cars and bruising, cuts and scraps under the clothing. If he was beaten his face has no broken nose, cheeks, jaw etc. Defensive wounds would be in his palms and fingers. He got hit then tumbled on pavement because of a belligerent drunk girlfriend.
He may have gotten bit by the dog first and then went outside and she hit him
Nice to know the feds are investigating this whole case. That speaks volumes.
But the feds are dirty too!
If they had anything that would exonerate her, she wouldn't be on trial.
@@ElleJ-kx4hu there’s lots of exculpatory evidence that’s been hidden! The DA is in cahoots with the crooked cops. This is not new and blatantly obvious.
@@ElleJ-kx4huthey’re still investigating. The last twitter update from FBI agent that I saw on twitter said as much. I’ve heard that they had an initial hearing where they made clear their experts opinions on both self phone data (google search) as well as manner of death. Judge ruled that the FBI trial and findings cannot be used in this trial.
The MA state police are investigating. The FBI helped in certain areas.
I feel so bad for the O’Keefe family. The poor kids lost their parents and than their uncle. The parents lost their daughter and than their son. That is just horrible.
The truth is coming out. Hopefully, the O’Keefe family can get justice.
Look at autopsy photos before making a judgement. Tells entire story. Also, left out the fact Albert’s and protors are close family friends
And Brian Albert is a dirty cop🤷🏾
@@Kapler1982 I’ve seen someone after a dog attack. Dogs bite and tear. They don’t attack with their claws. If it was a dog there would be punctures surrounded by bruising
I was Karen Read's hairdresser for several years. I can not believe that she is capable of hurting anyone. She's a sweet, kind, thoughtful, and generous woman. I am shocked to find out she's going through this. Karen, I'm praying for you! Maureen ❤
This is beautiful to hear ❤️ praying that John gets Justice somehow in all this mess that has been made
Have they asked you to be a character witness for her ? You should be. She needs all the help she can get. This case is so incredibly frustrating how important evidence was mishandled, thrown into red solo cups you drink in, put into stop and shop bags, and not into evidence marked bags. Someone could spend the rest of their life in jail for something they didn’t do. It’s just insane and sad that this is how they did their “investigation”
Lol she only decided she didn't hit him a year later...she did it and she's knows she did....
@@Tuesdaysdeadna Bang Bang Colin did.
💜💫 FREE KAREN READ 💫💜
Every interview should begin with showing his autopsy photos & the Cellebrite data of a search by a “witness” of “Hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am.
Why is the data from cellphone forensics NOT reliable in this case but is 100% in the Brian Walshe case?
The data shows it was searched at the time the body was found. That will be shown in court. The defence are making it up as they go. They are doing a trial by media.
lol absolute BS what u talk, Dunning-Kruger u probably believe in god
The woman that got up early to "help Karen find John" (a family member of those involved that was in the house) submitted a google search to find out how long it takes for a human to die in the cold several hours BEFORE John was found dying in the cold. She also informed a friend about John's death prior to her "helping" Karen find John's body...
Yes! How did Julie Albert know at 4:55 am he died when his body wasn’t discovered until 6 am. It’s so obvious any comment on this saying she is guilty is either one of them or someone who just watched this interview and hasn’t heard of this case yet.
that would be Jenn McCabe who did that
@@StephanieL.-rs2ulshe also googled it at 2:27 am and thought deleting it would make
It go away🤦♀️
But didn't Karen call her to help her look for him around this same time? Does it not make sense that she would be google that then if they think he's out in the cold without a coat like Karen says? And why did Karen not go directly back to the house she dropped him off at? Does that make sense to you?
And why would she need a couple of people to help her look for him? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."
@@Paul-cj1wb nope. Jen McCabe googled it at 2:27 am and Karen called her a little before 5 am. Also look at Julie Alberts police statement she told them she received a call from Jen McCabe at 4:55 am telling her that “Johnny was dying” the reason is because they did it and are framing Karen.
“Tell them that guy never came inside the house”
"exactly"
"She's telling them EVERYTHING!"
“My dear friend John who I loved so much” smh all lies!!!
“exactly” FREE KAREN READ!
Lots missed. Autopsy photos showing it couldn't have happened by her car, the car in police custody with hardly a scratch on it and Jen McCabe googling "Hos long to die in cold" 4 hours before John's body was found
Good job Karen #FreeKarenRead
Jenn McCabe is the leader of this cover up I believe.
Are you a forensic expert? Why can't Karen hire someone to do an independent autopsy on John's body?
@@dylandice4638The prosecution has failed to release a ton of stuff to the defense. Do your research.
And from whom do you have all this evidence from? The defense? And didn't Karen call this Jen McCabe to help her look for him? Would she not be googling that if they think he's out in the cold some place? And why would Karen call a couple of people to "help her look for him," around the neighborhood rather than she herself first going directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."
The injuries mentioned could have happened if a plow is out there plowing and the body is hidden by snow. A snow plow is very heavy and jagged from stones and other materials on roads and leaves scratches all over. Just look at a speed bump on a road that is regularly plowed and you can see them for yourself.
@@Paul-cj1wb plow guy saw no body there at 2:30am and he pays particular attention to areas around fire hydrants
She was 100% intoxicated and definitely shouldn't have been driving but she didn't kill him...
All pedestrian collision injuries on the Right side - swollen Right eyebrow, slice on Right eyelid, abrasions Right shoulder, abrasions Right arm, bruise on top of Right hand, abrasion Right side of knee. Broken whole piece of Right taillight. Cops got Right rattlesnake. You & your like can't picture any other pedestrian collision except being hit from the Front of a car meaning, with a bonnet that is low to the ground, so an impact to the legs with all manner of other injuries due to being flung or falling off the bonnet of the car. Yawn. It is nobody's fault that you also can't figure out how the back of John O’Keefe’s head slammed onto the edge of the concrete kerb which caused the severe skull fractures & then his brain slowly swelled while he froze to death. The marks on John’s right arm are Abrasions from blunt force trauma, blood cells only raise to the surface. No bleeding because there was no breakage of skin. Likely that John had tried to use his elbow at the last split second to push himself out of the way as he stood up due to picking up her glass of Vodka that he took off her lowlife ever foul-mouthed drunk ass.
His head went forward, body twisted & he went straight back, head hit edge of cement curb & due to the snow that had started to fall not long before, the road & grass was icy & so, Slippery. Due to the frantic life saving measures by the paramedics at the scene, in the ambulance & at the hospital which included solution to warm the blood/body, the left eye swelled also & blue/black eyelids which is very typical & called raccoon eyes.
FYI - that SUV was Not a sedan, it didn’t have a Trunk, the system of taillights are many, moulded plastic, higher set. The data from her ten ton Truck shows, she planted her foot to the metal Instantly doing 24.2 miles per hour for 62 feet. That car was fitted with a screen in front of her face, reversing camera & sensors. The beep beep beep was prevalent as she approached her boyfriend. It got faster when she didn't Stop. The data from her vehicle shows a sudden slight lessening of speed & the wheel turned slightly. Indicative of hitting a pedestrian. A demo was filmed using her car & those exact data entries & showing the brakes brought the car to an immediate stop on an icy road. She didn't slow, stop or even hesitate as the accelerator data Shows.
N.B. for all the dumb bums I will explain something else in Simpleton terms - having the sensor in her car also means that when she slowly & very deliberately backed into John's car at 5.07 a.m., her drake face was also hearing Beep Beep Beep. Her right hand reached over to press a button, the auto brake assist that she switched Off. The Authentic ring camera video shows the piece of the taillight Missing as she drove off. A cop went to John's house at 8.22 a.m., to see if kids there alone. The video from his car shows, the Same piece missing.
Karen Read is a very crafty female who thought she was The most attractive thing on the planet & believed in her demented mind, that All men should fall at her feet. She was lucky enough to be born a Psychopath so the killing of a human being was very Easy for her.
Like any trial, separate the vegetable soup from the chicken pieces. It is Very clear that she is Guilty. There were Two grand jury investigations, the 2nd run by the Feds. And then, the case went to Trial. Obviously the grand jury members from both had intelligent minds, you're just a Nobody.
Here’s how it goes - the more witnesses the prosecution had to put on the stand the More the trial drags out & so, the More work for her circus performers to do & so the Mega bucks that they get from Her. LOL.
The best part about the trial is knowing that Read is Broke & she will Always be broke as John's niece & nephew will Sue that Monster to hell & back Next.
I don't know how Paul contained himself having to watch that Thing enjoy herself very many of those days.
Back at the beginning, Yanetti on the courthouse steps & the announcement for the TV cameras "it was an accident, she didn't mean to hit him". Then along came a little spider from the bright lights of LA Land & he saw Big dollars signs & a fable was born against all those at the after-party, against every serving police officer in the State & against all medical responders for 50 miles.
The she-devil spent 1 million on a PR campaign to make a whole lot of numpties, cop haters & Ritas, into her turtle mutant cult members. Congrats. And BTW - as much as she laughed, smiled & smirked all through the trial, she is doing Same about You.
It's 5.00 a.m., "Kerry Kerry Kerry" then she hung up because the play-acting was Meant to freak the hell out of that poor woman. It's about 5.05 a.m., she calls back "John's dead, I think he might have been hit by a plough". At about 6.10 a.m., "stop there he is, let me out this f##king car". She 'saw’ a body from the middle of the back seat as the 2 women in the front were looking either side & ahead for John when driving in the middle of a Blizzard, pitch black outside still, no streetlights for that section of road & the body was about 6 feet back from the kerb at the far left side area of a family's front yard & completely Covered in several inches of Snow. Amazing supernatural powers from that evil-eyed devil in a dress. I suppose you would defend that thing even if that body was Your child yeah?
@@bethryan9077woof.
@@cherylcampbell9369 Yeah she's a dog alright.
@@bethryan9077 damn......you're invested.
@@cherylcampbell9369 Source the Authentic video from when she left John's house, the missing piece is Clearly seen. The same piece that Kerry saw when she was parked behind Read's car at Jen's house, only Read had stopped & packed snow down across the back of her car by then so Kerry could see only part of it. The same piece that Read was telling Jen about when both were still sitting in her car & That's why Kerry leant out her window to look. The same piece missing that Read showed them both when they were leaving John's house just before she made them take her to Fairview to 'discover' a body under 4-6 inches of Snow. The same piece missing when the cop went to John's house at 8.22 a.m., & parked not far behind her car & due to the cop-cam, that same piece missing is Clearly seen.
How very telling that the footage Read deleted when she went back there with her father, was the section where she was showing Kerry & Jen that broken taillight, you know, that had the piece Missing. Her parents also had CCTV cameras & it was quite dark late afternoon when her car was being driven onto the tow truck. The light bulb was still intact & one can See the white light shining through due to the piece Missing. Got it yet?
Chloe was rehomed because they moved to a condo and the dog was not allowed. This was before Karen and toilet turd concocted their conspiracies.
BTW doggy doo, what I stated in reply to that person, is only a Fraction of what was used to have her Proven Guilty already. It is nobodies fault that a couple of jurors had the same 3 brain cells as numpties like yourself running around the public domain without a leash. The prosecution team will Make Sure that thing waddles off out the Back door next time & she sure won't be beaming with joy Then.
Watching the trial... definitely a police cover up. I think the cops got in to a fight.. something happened in the house.. and they tossed him out. you mean to tell me, not one FIRST RESPONDER in the house didn't notice him on the grass!!!????
I think you're absolutely right!
Do you seriously think they would leave him in their own yard? Give me a break!
@jane6989 YES, I absolutely think they'd leave him in their own yard. It would be way too hard to take him anywhere else, In their drunken state, they put him on the lawn. That way, they could say they had nothing to do with it. It obviously worked in their favor as no one investigated inside of the house.
Nope
No wonder you guys ended up with trump as a president..
I feel really bad for the critical thinkers in your country...
They say “a picture is worth a thousand words”. NO WORDS NEEDED AFTER VIEWING THESE PHOTOS.
Not saying she did it. But she is not being totally honest. Definitely lying about the amount of alcohol she consumed and who would leave their boyfriend/girlfriend , Aftee waiting ten minutes. Then go home and call them repeatedly. Would've just stayed there. And probably walked up to the house and said tell my boyfriend he better hurry up.
Four strong drinks is a lot for a 120 pound woman….
I think she knew she hit him and went home in a panic waited a few hours then called friends to help her “ find” him. She took them straight to the body! Otherwise she would have just gone home and passed out from all the alcohol. I think she’s very clever
@@StephSilva-qw1lm that would be a good conclusion to reach if it was for the evidence that shows that the injuries to his body are in no way consistent with getting hit by a car. In the trial right now the defense has an expert medical examiner who has done thousands of autopsies and he is going to testify that his injuries are in no way consistent with a car accident. We can speculate all we want but that is kind of a huge plot hole. Even before this I thought, if he was hit by a car you would expect he abdomen to be bruised, ribs broken, pelvis broken, legs broken or injuries, basically places where a bumper (which is the first point of contact when a car backs into something) would hit someone. Instead we see no injuries on his lower body or abdomen and an injury on his arm and head.
She didn’t “leave him”, the agreement was that he would text her when he got inside, he never texted her so she just left. Kind of different than straight up leaving someone. She didn’t go home and just start calling either, she called once the early hours of the morning came and she figured he should be back by then. She might be lying about the alchohol she drunk but why wouldn’t she? The alcohol is the only thing that causes some doubt in this situation but that’s only excluding all of the evidence that works in her favor and the medical examiner testifying that his injuries in no way correlate to a car accident.
I guess we will see when ME takes the stand
There's no way these injuries were caused by being struck by a car in a snowy driveway. She wouldn't have been able to get enough speed
There’s no way that you could possibly know that because you don’t know anything about accident reconstruction. I really find it laughable when random people say things like this when there’s LITERALLY NO WAY you can determine that from watching a video about a case.
@@DarkAngel71180 well I am in accident reconstruction and with the amount of snow that was on the street its physically impossible to leave those kinda marks on him with nothing wrong with her car, she would have some damage. We all saw the video of when she hit John's car that she had minimal damage. Those injuries on his arm are from Chloe
@@DarkAngel71180it’s called common sense
@@tatertotter808Exactly 🎯 #FreeKarenRead 🙏 #JusticeForJohnOkeefe
See what the Feds have found out and the autopsy report will hopefully shed light. Trying to remain impartial until the end of the case
This video misses the most important piece of evidence. One of the people in the house that night googled “hos long to die in cold?” at 2:27am. Long before they should have been aware that anything was wrong. Also, the plow driver that night reports that he saw no body on the lawn that night and would have noticed if one was there. The prosecution’s case only sounds reasonable until you start digging into the details.
Or the multiple people who left the party around 1:30am or Matt McCabe looking out the window to see tire tracks but not a 200lb dying man
ruclips.net/video/XzRRNcStm4k/видео.htmlsi=lKIza03kHjDXJM2c
Why can’t anyone spell how anymore ????? It’s a lost art I guess
@@THEBIGLIE20forgive me for my ignorance, my English is not the best. But may I ask what you are talking about? Or what you mean by your comment?
@@THEBIGLIE20 they do this because that is how Jen McCabe typed “How long to die in cold” to do her Google search at 227am several hours before John O’Keefe was found dead outside on Boston cop, Brian Albert’s front lawn. It was obviously a typo at the time but I think we all know exactly what she meant and that she was searching for this answer during the making of the plan to cover up the murder.
Additionally the prosecution will not hand over any evidence the defense is asking for! Where is the library video? Where are John’s clothes? Their unwillingness to give these things over assures they are hiding something! #freekarenread
They gave the library video and guess what was missing? Two minutes of the video somehow disappeared. The two minute time frame that Karen would have been driving by with a tail light that wasn’t broken yet and would prove her innocence. Absolutely absurd case. They are all going down though the Feds are was too involved now.
@@Alienspecies635how did the feds get involved? It seems like they’re all trying to protect their own
Please explain what the library video is? I need to catch up.
@@slaws2279it would show it being towed with brake light intact, which another video did but John Procter apparently broke tail light and scattered this at the scene because then poof it was discovered.
@@keli449ohhh interesting. Thanks.
How is evidence of a crime on a front lawn with no motive or murder weapon NOT probable cause to search the residence? This is before Karen was even believed to be a suspect. How is a dead body on a front lawn not probable cause to search the residence?
At 9am, the crime scene was still an open and active investigation - but the house wasn't searched? What? Why? How?
Especially since the people in the house were with him the night before and were all friends.. the cops that showed up that morning knew this because they’re in the friend group! Something doesn’t sit right about it!
Interesting point. I haven't read anyone else asking this question. KR was arrested a few days later without the police doing a full investigation.
The cops went in the house and interviewed the homeowners the morning John was found.
@@dawnmills6755 please educate yourself before making a comment. The home was not searched. A conversation in the foyer with good boy Officer Lank lifelong friend is not due diligence in a murder investigation. The entire property was a crime scene, and was NOT treated as such.
Witnesses were not separated, the scene was not secured, evidence was not preserved, interviews were not recorded, the house was not searched, the camera used to take the photos of the front lawn was lost, witnesses names were intentionally spelled wrong/left out of the police report, red solo cups were used to collect blood, a leaf blower was used to blow snow around…
Wanna know how well they searched? They were "finding" pieces of her taillight days and weeks after the initial search.
Idk I know I’m being judgemental but she does not come off as being genuine and sincere. I think she had at least some small part in it if not the entire thing
This interview barely scratched the surface on the evidence that the defense has to support Karen's innocence. I can't wait to see justice served. #freekarenread
Me either, i extensively go over this case on my channel. Filings, evidence ect. Small videos like this dont really tell ppl much.
Lmao. She couldn’t get a hold of him so she went home and went to bed…😂😂😂 Needs the death penalty
So he goes inside the apartment, she tries to call on his cell phone, he doesn’t answer and she drives home and goes to bed? This seems reasonable to you?
This is so implausible as to be wholly unbelievable.
This is a very very biased interview
@@dkerr6449 first of all, what apartment are you even talking about? It’s obvious you don’t know the facts here 🤔
Question: So this house was a cop’s house. Not just any cop. A local hero. No security cameras? I mean his job was to bust drug gang members. No security cameras on his house?
They probably got rehomed along with his phone and his dog.
@@triciad4100😂
@@sharonsower1912John was a very good friend he even helped other children he knew, sorry you missed .she was probably jealous of that also!!! Because of her persona in court I don't think she would not have made a good mother! It's all or nothing!
Every cop I personally know (which includes family members) don't have any also so it doesn't really mean anything to me.
Conveniently his neighbor's cameras were not working either.
If she saw John walk inside Brian’s home, why would she wonder if she hit him or not? If Brian killed John, why would he dump his body right outside his house? What was his plan exactly?
@@RationalNon-conformistyeah but wouldn’t they try to move his body further from the house then? Like closer to the road? It doesn’t make sense to just leave his body basically at their own lawn
Because she has drunk, hit him, and drove off.
@@realresident1890you an officer for canton PD?
Because she didn’t want to harm him in anyway. It’s a concern by a person that loves him.
I would have to have the same questions as you but at the same time I feel this lady Jen helped her idk somethings seems off about them but i have no doubt Karen participated because she just lied and said she had 4 drinks but it was proven from footage it was 7-9. Also why say did i hit him ? The fact you have to ask yourself that is scary
I want to believe her, but why did she leave him there? If you go into a house and disappear I’m not stepping foot off of that property until I find my loved one.
Exactly
That’s the part I don’t get and find hard to believe.
It was her boyfriend, not her husband or a child.
He wanted to go to the party, she didn't. She dropped him off there and went home.
@@pistolpete8231 He was 46 years old and he was invited in a bar to come over to Brian Alberts house but they didn't ask her explicitly, so Karen was not sure it was an extended invitation so that was the reason she drove off .. still hoping he called her to say he you are invited too so she was a bit frustrated about this too.. It's not nice to have to go home alone after an evening out!
4:04 per her .. he approached the door. So why would she question if she had possibly hit him? LYING!
She did not want John going into the house with Higgins in fear of him finding out she had indeed been hitting on him. They argued in the vehicle and John got out.. she kept moving the car forward away from the home and became increasingly agitated and concerned because he was going to go in anyways. She was pissed and reversed the car to go back towards to home to continue agruing with him to not go in and hit him.
@@drmikeforcynthiasullivan1457💯💯💯👀👂👍🏽
Youve never 2nd guessed yourself in the midst of severe trauma/stressful situations? Typiucal ignorant internet troll..
@@drmikeforcynthiasullivan1457 what? Absolutely zero evidence of that. Literally zero
NO mention of the Google search "How Long to Die in Cold" from inside the house by Jen McCabe?????
N u wouldn't search that if your friend was missing in tge cold. Plz stop, that is tge dumbest comment I seen. N there's alot, I would, if my friend was missing n I knew w time I saw him last I would search that, any normal person would. Defense reaching at straws.
@@playarlz36lol okay that’s why the fbi just confirmed her google search
@@playarlz36genius, can you offer a reasonable justifiable reason as to why she'd think he was dead??
@pistolpete8231 did she Google search he is dead. No idiot, she searched how long so they know how long they have to find him before he dies. God think before you respond, n every good person out there would do the same.
@playarlz36 hey pea brain...take about 5 minutes to SLOWLY re-read what I wrote.
I simply asked why she'd THINK he was dead in the 1st place to get the idea to make that google search. Where did I say "she googled he was dead"? I'm not sure if it's the ketamine or meth, but you're not as smart as you think.
There are many holes in this case and all indications lead to a cover-up...keep banging that keyboard though.
First time i am seeing this case . This man was beaten, those injury is not indicative of a hit from a vehicle.
Higgins, Albert destroy phones day before ordered to preserve, can’t recall numerous events, butt dial/answer each other. Jennifer McCabe butt dials O’Keefe 6 times and butt cancels before vmail. What a shady town. Video missing of when her LX 570 arrived at police department? Please
Why is the entire story not being told here??? Left out so many details.
Corruption all around!!!
Lying tends to do that
If the prosecution has so much evidence against her where is it?? 4 things out of 50 have been turned over to the defense.
Because the FBI has stepped in to assist Canton and State Police in the investigation and they are analyzing the evidence before it’s turned over to Read’s defense.
@@Q-ZOO this is 💯 not true. They haven’t stepped in to “help” them investigate. The FBI stepped in to investigate them and their corruption. Why would the FBI be investigating the same crime the MA state police is already investigating? Even if Karen Read did hit John with her car- and she didn’t- this wouldn’t be in FBI jurisdiction. But police and government corruption would be! 💡
Is that what the defence have said ? Lol. She’s a killer. She admitted to hitting him at the start then changed her story once she as charged.
1 of the 4 things they turned in was altered as well. A video with 2 minutes randomly deleted midway through. They are pulling fingernails to make her look guilty.
@@stevenprice6957nope. why do you lie?
The only one who was angry with him that night was Karen Read. The only one with a motive was Karen Read. She admitting to hitting him and we see her speed off.
The fact that the defense is the one fighting for all the evidence to be on the table speaks volumes. I knew Karen was innocent as soon as I saw that someone in the house Googled " how long to die in cold" at 227 am. John wasn't found until 6 am
And prosecutors requested a gag order on the defense. Never happens that way - usually the other was around. Super shady
Where are you getting this info that someone googled that at 227am? Where is that an actual fact. I would love to know so I can see it. Not from an internet conspiracy theorist, but from actual phone or google record that can be admitted into evidence.
@@Paul-cj1wb celebrite data extraction from McCabes phone. There is a report submitted in the court docs
@@Paul-cj1wbDude you need to keep up. If you haven't seen that then you're not paying attention.
It isn’t a fact that she did it at 2:27. You are just parroting what Turtleboy says. What the prosecution believes is that the browser session was opened at 2:27 and never closed until after she searched it at around 6am.
This was a great interview but so many important details were missed! The people inside the house googled “hos long to die on cold”, the missing library footage, the location of his body…so many things!
The whole thing about the Google search may be a technical glitch based on what I saw on court TV.b
@@iMatti00yep
@@iMatti00 “May be a technical glitch”. Lemme guess….Coffinduper?
@@estrella5935ding, ding, ding. JC has been proven to be a mouthpiece for the prosecution. If the state has a poor enough case to enlist her, they should be charged!!!!
No way those injuries were caused by Karen's car!!!
Don’t believe your lying eyes and ears 😜
@wishboneman right, don’t believe your lying eyes and ears
Oh yes they were. Guilty.
There is no way in hell those injuries came from a car. That man was beaten and thrown into the snow.
I think the prosecution must be alleging Karen Read’s car has claws and teeth…😂😂😂
And bitten by the dog the owners of the house no longer have...
@@teemyoutube2066 💨🐕💨
Especially at 5 mph. Lmao
Sloppy coverup. More like a panic alert.
Have doubts? Just google the autopsy pics. Anyone can see from the autopsy pics that an SUV did not cause the injuries to John''s body. He has dog bites and scratches to his arm! Karen is 100% Innocent!!
I’ve watched the trial from the beginning. This entire thing reeks of a cover up to me. The Alberts know way more than they are saying, & the “investigation” was disastrous from the beginning. My heart breaks for the O’Keefe’s. 💔
@@EC-iy7js I have too, the defence had done a good job of using the cop and family as scape goats!!! They just go out beat John up, For what reason!!!??? He helped them with their children, they cry, they are sitting right near Reed! Wonder how painful that is!! She's a CONIVER, SHE HAS NOT SHED 1 TEAR! EVEN LOOKING AT JOHN'S AUTOPSY, SHE LOVED HIM?????
@@pennicochrane8886 it's not for you to say she never cried over this. Attorneys tell their clients to be stoic in court. You don't see her when she's not in court. How do you explain John's apple health watch saying he climbed up and down stairs during the time he was supposedly dead already? Why did they re-cement their basement, ditch the dog, sell their house? Why are they doing google searches about someone dying out in the snow from that house in the middle of the night? Why did the expert say a car couldn't have caused those injuries he had? The dog bites/scratches? The manner of death was undetermined.
This evidence creates a lot of reasonable doubt in my opinion.
The cops beat him up for what reason? drunkenness makes you do stupid things. That's why. And you only know what you've seen on CCTV about their interactions with John, and not anything else.
She didn't kill him
@@pennicochrane8886you're projecting a lot of your own weird problems onto Karen. so, who is it in your life was it that she reminds you of? You're salivating and it's weird, lady.
@@pennicochrane8886she can't have been both "hysterical" according to Jen McCabe but also emotionless according to you. You aren't very bright.
@@Littleangel_-jp4xb Hi Karen, you should know that not Everybody slurped down your dirty Kool Aid. Aww. BTW - you have Already been Proven Guilty in a court of Law again. It's nobodies fault that a couple of jurors at trial were turleboy mutants who couldn't even work out that everything You have just repeated again, was Proven to be Incorrect. The prosecution will make Sure that you waddle off straight out the Back door next time & you Won't be beaming from ear to ear Then.
Also ur plow truck driver didn’t see his body there when he 1st plowed the St. John had bite marks on his arm from their dog, his cell phone pinged in the house going upstairs and down stairs and at 230am someone from inside the house googled- how long does it take to die in the snow
Dog bites are puncture wounds not straight lacerations
@@StephSilva-qw1lm and there are no less than 20 puncture wounds on his right arm
Plow trucks are very bumpy. I’ve been in one, and I never would have noticed a black object in a snow bank. People need to stop speaking on subjects they’re uninformed about.
If she's lying, she's a psycho. If she's telling the truth then the real culprits are idiots. Why dump the body of your murder victim outside your home?
Where else would they put his body?? That’s actually a good way to get away with murder by saying he got hit by a car.
@@RationalNon-conformist- well not ten feet from the house they were partying in!! But being it was a house full of cops you would think they could come up with a better conspiracy than that!
wats her relationship with the attorney, all this “lateral” stuff is makin my head hurt
Lol I know!!
Why gather evidence in a used grocery bag and red solo cups? The real culprits ARE idiots.
What circus did she pick us her attorney he's a whole character 😂
If you're not going to tell the whole story, why bother. State is wasting their time trying to convince the court of Karen's guilt, meanwhile the real murderer is off living life. I pray Karen gets her life back soon and that justice will be served for those actually responsible.
It was a weak interview by ABC.
The cop already sold jis house , hus his assets, ready to go ""ON THE LAMB WITH ALL HIS BAGS OF DOPE HE GOT 4 FREE ,RAIDING GANG DEALERS.. THE SISTER IN LAW FRAMED HER WITH THE TAILIGHT AND GLASS EVIDENCE.. TJATS Y SHE WENT OVER TO HIS HOUSR.. KAREN WAS AT HIS JOUSE BCUZ HE DIDNT RESPOND TO Baby SITTER, so karen went ovrr there to relieve the sitter with the kids... after she hot thrm ready and off yo school, thoseb2 lying beatches showed up.. to frame her with evudense and tell cops that she said/ did things, to get the story rolling... tjst womanvwas protecting her husband and brother in law... karen said they r all family..
I agree they did a 9 minute show on this. So many more important things to bring up.
She’s the killer. Lol.
@@stevenprice6957Tabloid reporter. Sensational news. 🙄
Yes those autopsy photos say it all there was a brawl in that home!
no coroner or expert would ever attribute the injuries to a slow moving car in a winter storm unless they are also corrupt
@@tkx7 slow moving? you got the exact speed or youre just making evidences?
EXACTLY! My knuckles would look the same after I got into fights in high school!
@@enzoinfinity1 24
@@enzoinfinity1well isnt the commonwealth saying she was going 24 mph in reverse when she hit him?
This woman has absolutely NO ROLE in his murder. Cover up by the cops
Where is the dog? Where is the basement carpet? Why did they sell the house thats been in the family? All so suddenly too...?
The dog is in Vermont and NIcole Albert testified that she could give them the info (owner's name, address, etc.) if anyone wanted it. They (Alberts) aren't trying to hide it.
They fixed up the basement because they were going to sell the house and the basement had taken in water many times and needed new flooring.
They met with a real estate agent in November of '21, just two months *before* the incident, because they were planning to sell.
00:35 look at that arm and tell me a Lexus SUV did that. It didn’t. It was a German Shepherd who lived inside the house until they got rid of her afterwards.
What do you mean? I thought all Lexus’ came with teeth and claws on the back bumper 😂😂😂
@@mainejournalnews8737 that was only models produced in the 90’s. The modern day versions have elected to no longer have that commonly overlooked feature.
@@mainejournalnews8737😂😂😂
Those are gentle German shepherd bites 😳 they usually can bite straight through into bone. Was he practice for her?
@@mainejournalnews8737 😅
Ok my one question is if she saw him approaching the house why would she even question if she hit him? I don’t get it
Good question 🤔
Watch the trial.
Because she probably wondered my God was I so drunk that I like lost it last night? She was hysterical and in that moment that's why when you're hysterical you are never reasonable. The fact is the FBI has already confirmed his injuries are not from a car or an suv. His injuries are two black eyes, cut to the nose, blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and dog attack lacerations all over his arm. He went in that home and never came out alive
Remember, she saw him approaching the door and then she left. He did not go inside yet so it's possible he could have walked back out towards her and while she was backing up to leave hit him. But she didn't know I'm just saying to answer your question this is her line of thinking while in hysterics and just finding her beloved murdered
If you watch the trial, she had a texting cheating relationship with one of the men in the house, which also explains why she didn't want to enter the house, and encouraged John to also not go " why are we going there, are we welcome" etc. She likely said, I caused this, because she was in an emotional affair with a man inside of that house.
My son was killed by a drunk driver. Since when did we start supporting and cheering for people who delibrately get behind the wheel of a car, drunk off their ass, without a care in the world. So drunk she didn't know what the hell she'd done. If she is going to lie about how many drinks she had... what else is she lying about. Drunks always lie about how much they have had to drink. God! It just makes me so mad! I miss my son. 💔
I think that drink limit on Read is here say. There was no blood test on Karen Read. Your perception is on information that was never confirmed. You’re ok with that? Was your son’s killer checked for this? If so, that is why you know. Don’t take your personal incident and plaster it on this one. You have no idea what the truth is here.
BTW, my brother died from alcohol poisoning at 27. I kinda of have an idea what alcohol can do to a family.
You haven’t looked at all at the facts of this case. This couldn’t be further from the truth and is completely inaccurate…I suggest you watch the trial…
I agree about the drunk driving…it is so irresponsible and can endanger others lives as well as their own. Nothing good happens with excessive drinking. I’m so sorry about your son. Drunk driving is horrible!
Agreed on drunk driving but doesn't make her a murderer. I am so sorry about your son. But please don't let that be a veil to let you not see the truth of this obvious cover up.
Possibly was drunk and pissed off.
May have simply run over him accidentally….. or not.
Sounds hard to prove either way.
I believe it was an accident. Poor investigation and we will never get the truth
Interesting how she said she admired the fact he took in his niece/nephew however evidence/text messages from the most recent witness does not in any way come off as admirable. Those poor children will feel they are a burden due to the unnecessary and shameful remarks she made regarding John’s custody of them. That was certainly a turning point for me.
WOW so his sister, and her husband passed away. The children had both parents die. So he steps up and becomes their adopted father... and then he dies. Those poor kids. Both of my parents died in my late teens, could not imagine dealing with that as a child.
Why would she ask if she hit him if she saw him go into the house? Sorry, go up to the house, not in. B’cuz she was looking at her phone. Why would she leave him after waiting for 10 minutes? They must’ve killed him immediately. Her story doesn’t make any sense.
She hit him so hard that he ended up in the yard and the only damage was a broken BACK tail light? He had scratches on one arm, two black eyes , and a fractured skull. All from a woman backing up and a broken tail light? The prosecution is never going to get past the house not being searched.
Boom!
Karen: "I had told them I cracked my taillight" also Karen "I hit something with my car but I didn't look at the damage."
Karen: "I saw John at the door."
Also Karen: "I thought I might have unwittingly incapacitated him."
Karen: **Has 9 vodkas and lime, knows she is on video doing so, knows the Commonwealth has her BAC level from the next morning**
Also Karen: "I had four (drinks.)"
Karen: "I thought I could have unwittingly incapacitated him."
Interviewer: "Is it possible you hit him?:
Also Karen" "No not possible."
Apparently you haven't been paying attention to the case. She hit John's car backing out of the driveway. There's video that proves it. She never said she had 9 drinks and they absolutely do not have her on video drinking nine drinks you just made that up 😂 BAC level of .13 % is like 4 drinks if that
If you think she's guilty you are either ignorant or related to them.
@@Alienspecies635 She 'tapped' John's car in the d'way--no way in hell it would have broken her taillight. She backed into his car intentionally, so she would have an alibi to explain her busted taillight. Some of y'all are so myopic that it's sad.
NO ONE should make an assumption based on this ten minute segment. #FreeKarenRead
TB Daily News has complete and exclusive coverage of the case. This was a quick recap and doesn’t cover the most incriminating details of the coverup.
🐢🐢
She is very lucky to be able to afford these amazing attorneys. If she had a public defender, she would be in jail for life. So sad that in this country, an innocent person has to go broke to defend themselves in a case in which they are innocent. She needs to sue the Albert guy for wrongful death.
She is so guilty, No one could could see the Officer in the snow, logical, no fighting in the house!! Calling all those people proved nothing. Some happened from the bar to the house between the 2 of them. Can't stand mouth, she also snear. GUILTY!
@pennicochrane8886 lol wait until the defense brings in all the evidence FROM THE FBI who has been investigating the frame job by dirty cops and MSP for over 2 years.
Agree 100%
@@pennicochrane8886 Any chance we can explain how he got a black eye....from being hit on his arm by her car, at what would be less than 10 miles per hour?
@@glorygoma7182
Will leave it up to the Coroner to decide how it happened. Defense wants to blame the dog also. Defence is all over the place!!!
Why we're the marks on his arms not mentioned more? And then insinuated the glass theory again & brought up? Where is Chloe the dog? Why was the house sold so quickly? Why were so many of these questions not asked? And why was Proctor not mentioned making up lies? We need to know!!!
Why is all evidence pointing to her and people are ignoring it. Trying to find reasons of other instead of looking at the facts. Not fairy stories from a defence team. She said twice she hit him. She asked can someone google how long it takes someone to die in cold weather. That is why the search is there. The defence aren’t going to tell you that now are they. She changed her story multiple times. She’s full on with lies.
a library with 24 hour survilenace for decades, stops working for 2 mins when this care drives by and it got deleted ................... forget the text, the dog, house sold, HOLY COW
This is an eye opener of how cops can look like the good guys but be corrupt. The wounds on him speak volumes. It screams beat up not hit by a car. The sister in law googled “how long does it take to die in the snow” Brian lied on stand and was caught in lies. He wasn’t making sense. An innocent person at first feels guilty that’s why she thought she hit him with her car while drunk. But realized that wasn’t the case. After the fight got out of hand and he was beaten to death, They knew she was drunk so they made it look like she hit him with her car. She was framed. And I know she’ll be set free.
They were all friends!!! There is absolutely no reason for them to kill him! The defence is doing a good job of convincing you and others. She is Shrewd and a tough cookie! He has nothing rlse
He has nothing else to use
Except the calls.
Why wouldn't she just assume that he stayed there, rather than instantly thinking he's out in the storm and why did she recruit 2 witnesses before just going back to the drop off point and knocking on their door?
Because he had custody of his niece and nephew and had never stayed out all night before.
4:14 I honestly don’t understand why she would get up in the pitch dark during a blizzard to drive around looking for John… as far as she knew he was at Brian Albert’s house, probably got totally shitfaced and passed out on a couch… why would she think anything else? Why would she be driving around looking for him in a blizzard? That doesn’t make any sense. She knew she had dropped him off at a party with a fellow police officer that John greatly admired - she should have assumed John had the night of his life hanging out with his hero getting drunk and passing out…..
She got up because she knew she hit him with the vehicle.
Because she called him and he didn’t answer. She was worried. Moreover she dropped him off around 12am, late but acceptable for an after party. She woke up having not heard from him at all around 3am, excessively late to still be at someone’s house-these are 40+ year olds not frat kids.
How did she expect him to get home? She said that she waited while he walked up to a side door and because he didn’t call her she burn off and went home. They were supposed to be going over there together that doesn’t make sense. You can get all scuffed up from falling down on the ground, I have scars to prove it. If you hit with a car, you can get scratched up by the ground, depending on how it hits you yeah you can mess up your face. I have seen it. Her whole story doesn’t make sense and I just started following the trial.
@@TwistedTalesofTrueCrimethey live less than 3miles from the house. He’s a grownup, I’m sure she assumed he’d Uber or get a ride. I’d never expect my grown ass man to spend the night at another persons house when we live right down the street. Also he was found on the grass. She drives a huge Lexus SUV, he had no mid body damage, his eyes were blacked, swollen, knuckles bruised, a gash in the top of his head and his arm had not abrasions but deep cuts/marks…have you seen the scene? No way she hit him and caused those injuries on a man over 6ft tall with that car in that location…impossible
@@DamnitDana I was unaware of all those bruises. Especially on his knuckles this strange. I would expect bruises maybe on one side and if he kind of rolled over or something like that. I can see someone being hit and then crawling to the side, but those bruises are questionable. Especially the location. I’m going to continue to observe the trial. I’m glad that I had no real exposure before this. That way I can assess it from fresh eyes. Thank you for sharing.
At around the 4:30 mark, she admits she went out searching for John alone before calling Jen and Kerry. She also admits she showed the women the tail light. She then says she may have incapacitated him unwitting somehow and in his drunkenness...passed out...that's not even a clear sentence. She is guilty by this interview alone.
and there’s conveniently missing library footage from their camera, his found hat has only been photographed, but never added into evidence, the Canton PD initial reports written on the very same day, had the initial crime scene pic replaced with the pic AFTER the taillight piece was planted on top of snow, and Brian Albert’s phone number was replaced/changed from the first report to the second altered report. Let’s not forget Jen McCabe’s 2:27 am search…”hos long to die in cold” either.
Despite the fact that alot of detailed pieces are missing, I think it's a good interview for her. Reality is.... it's not going to matter. The driveway footage paired with prosecution statements exonerates her and proves police corruption.
Let me share ER experience from a Trauma Level 1 hospital. Head trauma looks exactly like the autopsy photo, especially the bulging eyes. Remember, the hand would fracture long before the skull and this patient/victim had multiple skull fractures.
That requires trauma and more force than that which occurs in a professional fight.
This is indicative of a blunt force trauma head injury consistent with being struck by a vehicle and the secondary impact of the head striking the ground with coup-recoup movement of the brain/trauma and not a fist. Had it been a fight there would have been other obvious bruising. If you are struck by a vehicle at a slow speed (I.e. backed into) it will cause you to fall and strike the back of your head (occipital lobe) which will result in head trauma which will look like bulging/swollen eyes, bleeding from the orfaces of the mouth and nose and possibly eyes, GCS 3 neuro. You can not observe fractures and breaks or skeletal injuries and nobody is gonna image a dead patient to find them. So think about this-a car slowly backs into him, strikes perhaps his orbital/eyebrow region, he falls back onto his head and is knocked unconscious and dies of the elements/hypothermia. It is VERY possible without other observable injuries. If he has been hit at 30 MPH would this look different? Of course. When we get a patient in the trauma bay, l'm concerned with life-sustaining or saving
measurements. Not all internal trauma (in fact, most) is visible externally or overtly.
Additionally, remember the ER physician stated his forearm had multiple superficial abrasions. These are to the epidermis not penetrating which are extremely shallow (think fingernail scratch), not a K9. It is frustrating when people with no knowledge of how a TBI presents/looks jump to the conclusion he just looks like he was beat
Wow thank you
You're rare. A logical mind in this propaganda circus.
The prosecution’s case is incoherent. It’s time for them to give it up and be prosecuted themselves. Everyone knows Karen is innocent. Anyone saying otherwise hasn’t been paying attention or is complicit. His injuries don’t match the prosecutions lie that he was hit by a car. Innocent people don’t replace their basement floors, abruptly sell their family home for $50k less than value during a sellers market, get rid of their dog and try to retire early. Innocent people come outside their house to see what’s going on when there is a dead body on their lawn. It is inexcusable that house wasn’t secured and investigated- IT WAS THE CRIME SCENE. Heads need to roll, and 💯 not Karen’s!!
not everyone
What was the motive for the Albert's to kill John? Your theory is absurd.
@@dawnmills6755 if you have to ask then you haven’t done any research into this case. What’s absurd is commenting things that are actually established facts are absurd theories. Do some research lady. Hope you and your loved ones never get framed for a murder you didn’t commit and have uninformed people celebrate it bc they can’t be bothered to learn.
@@StephanieL.-rs2ulI feel the same
@@dawnmills6755 Who said it was the Albert's? It could have been Higgins. Why do half the witnesses not remember his jeep there, but when questioned remember every little detail about Karen Reads vehicle. It could have been an unfortunate accident where a drunken fight ended up in a death, by anyone in the house. It could of been Colin also. Why did nobody mention that he was in the house until many months after? Why did they not interview half the people at the house that night until the FBI started investigating the investigation?
So according to her, he goes into the friend's house to confirm if they are welcome or not, she waits 10 minutes in the car, never says she texted or called him while waiting there, gets pissed off, and drives back to their own house. But then says she "continued calling him," then falls asleep around 1:30am, wakes just before 5am, and starts to look for him canvasing the neighborhood. What??? She didn't go directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? That makes zero sense. That's the first thing anyone would do.
She looks like a very mean person with a nasty temper. She was clearly angry that night to just leave in a huff. Hmmm, there's something fishy about her story.
And has she taken and passed a lie detector test? Or has she refused? Reportedly, this McCabe lady took a lie detector test as to her testimony and passed. Has Karen? And if not, why not?
Jen McCabe never took a polygraph stupid. She did Google "how long to die in cold" at 227 AM though.
The fact that she maybe hit him then left him there to die then came back hours later is the nail to me
Right. Why would a grown drunk woman come back to look for her drunk bf cop who is at the home of friends who are also cops? One would assume he slept on the sofa. He’s a grown man, he’ll call if he needs a ride.
Ignorant. Have you watched the trial? Have you heard the last 2 witnesses? John was not hit by a vehicle. It's been proven by physics and engineers who have been hired by the DOJ. Not possible!!
Theres no excuse for leaving him! She doesn't even cry when speaking about him at its very recent. I hope his "family" deal with her! What's the penalty for treason?????
How can u remember things so clearly and certain and then so clearly certain on not KNOWING ANYTHING?!
Sounds a little like jodi arias
Def set up.i think he was hurt in that house and placed outside,was the house ever searched or sprayed for blood splatter.poor kids have been through hell
The entire town, state police, a multitude of friends and relatives, are ALL in cahoots! Are you all crazy?
Never searched.
@@barbaramay1866 This is the 2nd time this has happened. As soon as this is over they're gonna move onto the next case where that young pregnant girl that hung herself on a door knob was a minor having sex with the 2 cop brothers.
Another theory floating around (armchair detectives only, that I know of) is that there may have been a fight in the house, & that John was trying to leave on his own & simply didn't make it very far. Meaning, someone broke it up- possibly saying he ought to just go now or whatever- so John took off injured on foot, possibly passed out/fell down on the spot at corner of yard. If only a couple people inside knew what happened- such as a fight in the basement, for instance- then it would have been easy to keep it quiet, whether they knew he had fallen down outside, or even if they thought he was trying to walk home from there. They were all admittedly intoxicated, which skews people's judgement, actions, recollection, etc. Would also potentially explain the 2:27 am google search for how long it takes to die in the cold, & why nobody else (supposedly) saw him out there, or claims not to have. Just another theory, not my opinion~ too many missing connections & details to weigh in on it, personally.
Really bizarre & scary~ most of all for the innocent children involved. My heart hurts terribly for his neice & nephew, they were just getting comfortable again after losing their mom & dad. They have suffered a whole lot of loss~ three parents basically, four if we count Karen, who had also become close to them at that point. They also have no clear accounting of what happened to their Uncle John that night, & they deserve justice as much as John O'Keefe does. Praying for all of the above, praying for Karen regardless of her involvement or not, and for all family members affected. Please Lord~ shine light on the entire, actual truth and cover the hurting with Your peace. They need You, we all need You.
Especially since her went in. She wasn't sure they were invited and didn't know them.
Why so many people saying not guilty??
evidence says NG
I don’t know. Evidence seems to point to her. I need to see the trial.
Honestly this interview makes it seem like Karen Read did it. However, they are leaving out A LOT of important information that show that she is indeed being used in a cover up.
You don’t know that.
What is nuts is the idea that cops conspired to kill a fellow cop and drag his body outside all to frame her. She was drunk and accidently hit him and drove off. MANSLAUGHTER!!
And that's how he got a black eye and abrasions over his face? how about the deleted search about "dying in the cold" at 2AM. Also Jen seems to have been up that whole night, after drinking.
Thats how his watch recorded him descending steps, that macabe woman googling at 2:27 am hrs before the body found "how long does it take to die in the cold". Also him having dog bites and the dog is missing, the basement that his watch recorded him descending remodeled without ever being processed and the home sold, the officer in that house a boxer explaining his eyes, the autopsy not concluding a car with barely a scratch on it killed him, video of her barely hitting his car on way to search for him and shows that tiny piece missing as she goes out o'keefs driveway.
@glorygoma7182 well said
Karen is Innocent!!!! Something stinks in Canton.
Stinke...
The stink is Albers and McCabe.
Wtf did he see in her??? It’s a travesty she got a mistrial!
She is innocent. A corrupt family that should be in jail. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see he was killed in that house.
Do your homework!!!!!! There are a ton of discrepancies!!!!! She is innocent. There is DEFINITELY a coverup going on protecting the people responsible.
She is innocent. Deep dive and help her. Be the journalists you say you are.
She needs to soften up a little, rather than be angry and attack…currently the way she communicates is scary…and gives the impression that if you mess with her she’ll kill you.
Does not work in her favor
Wouldn't you be pissed if the entire police force is against you and you know that you didn't do anything it's an injustice I'm upset about it I'm not even her
Couldn’t disagree more. You must be a cop lol.
If you and your family had to live in hell for 27 months, I bet you’d be furious! How frustrating this must be for her, not to mention her losses. Karen never uses it as an excuse & rarely mention it, but she has MS which could affect her speech, facial expressions, gait, etc. Have some compassion!
Disagree. This is how people on the East coast talk.
It’s the accent. A lot of people talk that way
Why did Jen McCabe Google "How long to die in cold" at 2:27AM when no one knew John was missing (supposedly), and he (supposedly) never went into the house?
Let’s wait for the proof of when that was googled and by whom - at least if the time is not accurate, it could have been googled to work out how long he’d been lying there before being ‘found’ ….
Why you ask. ? Good question. Many witnesses have stated that Karen Read said to them, someone search how long does it take etc. this is while she is on top of the body. You’ll actually see that this is the fact of the matter. There’s a lot of made up garbage coming from her team. They have support so they are going with it. She admits to hitting him twice in the early stages. She admits after that to not remembering anything because she was too drunk. Now she remembers everything haha. Yeah right. Psycho woman
Forensic scientists confirmed in court that a phone tab was left open at 2:27AM and JM opened that tab again around 6am to do that search. They proved with proof JM did not make this search at 2:27AM
@@gina2641 that's actually not what happened at all 🤣
Funny she’s the only one that could see his body from the backseat covered in snow in a blizzard because she knows that’s where she hit him
I'm sure Jen and Kerry were playing dumb. After all, Jen knows exactly what happened when he was knocked unconscious
I’m glad this story is finally getting national attention since locally it is getting nothing from anybody but turtle boy. I do think they left the key points like what appears to be dog scratches and bites on John’s arm. How Brian Albert lost the dog soon after, sold his house at a $50,000 loss right after & how Jennifer McCabe googled how long to die in the cold. Hopefully more to come on a later show,
Why would she go out looking for him if she thought he was at his friends house? That doesn’t make any sense, she drove over there to see if she really did kill him, then had to play the “omg what happened”? Game
Would you go look for your boyfriend if he had not returned yet.
Ide be passed out from all the drinking
She woke up at 5 call her friends looking for John who does that ? He’s not a kid he could crush at the friends house, why she was so worried about him ? Because She’s left him to die after hitting him and she knows it!!!
I’m watching the trial now, and John Okeefe was not actually friends with the Alberts. Which is why Karen was confused about going to their house after leaving the bar
Because he wasn’t returning her texts and didn’t come home.
JUST GOOGLE THE AUTOPSY PICTURES! Those Knuckle wounds were the Exact Same as mines whenever I got into a fight from 16-25 yrs old…Those are Defense Wounds!
I agree.. and the black eyes, he looks like he was beat up.
Right! His injuries were to his head and arm only. He didn't have any injuries on his chest, stomach, hips, thighs, lower legs, or on his feet. No way he was hit by a vehicle!
@@KayInMaine FBI already said %100 he wasn’t hit by a car
@TheShahofBaltimore yup and they're correct
6:33 she says “ No! Not possible!” When asked if she could have hit him… but yet had just said she asked that herself! She had clearly asked “ Did I hit him?” So why the emphatic no when Matt asked her?
There’s much more to this story than what was reported here.
if she saw him going up the driveway while dropping him off and then left, why would she ever have to say "Did I hit him?"
Because she's a liar?
Its nervous mutterings of someone that just found their loved one dead and she was also drunk. The evidence speaks for itself and if you can't see that then you are just as horrible as the ones covering his unfortunate murder.
Because Jen put an earworm in her mind, and Karen was in shock and desperately trying to make sense of how it happened. Most people don't immediately jump to "his friends murdered him and dumped his body"; they think it must have been a horrible accident first even if it doesn't make sense.
People say all sorts of things when they're in shock. Use your brain, man.
Thank you
When will the prosecution stop stalling and turn over and allow defense to test the 50+ pieces of evidence?
Why doesn’t the defense have the original (not amended) death certificate? His hat?
Photos of the scene at 6am?(None taken?)
Why was the ONLY first responder to be interviewed a family friend of the Alberts?
How did the 2-3 minutes of the Canton Library’s video that would show Karen driving home without a cracked taillight be the only portion deleted?
Why weren’t neighbors in the other direction asked for ring camera footage?
Imagine a man leaving his girlfriend and going home? Would he get media support????
He was left WITH FRIENDS. Details matter.
He probably ephod not have been charged
Just the injuries on his arm prove something else happened.
After reading all of the case material presented so far, there is no chance this goes to trial.
All of the prosecution's witnesses (LEO and otherwise) will be pleading the 5th.
You have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
Where is the dog!!!!
A dog attack would leave more injuries than that - the tyre of a heavy vehicle driven over his arm could make such creases of the skin.
Coincidentally they got a youth nothing next day. Their officers they know exactly how to get rid of evidence
Not a dog attack that was wild animal marks
9 drinks at 98 lbs. She was drunk as a skunk.
She’s that short?
All of them were, including cops.
Her blood alcohol level was NEVER tested that night so you don't know how drunk she may or may not have been.
@@vbm2119 I know she was drunk, she was still over the limit when tested in the morning.
I use to believe she was innocent til I saw this interview and started to dig deeper into the evidence.
Karen’s a Karen
So now you look at how someone speaks to see if they’re guilty? You should never be on a jury . Facts matter more than your feelings about her.
@@RationalNon-conformist I didn’t say anything about “how she speaks”, but her words absolutely matter!! She’s told several different stories, she’s lied over and over again and anyone can see that she’s lying in that interview! Now we know she was lying because her own statements have completely contradicted her stories of what happened that night. So maybe you should learn how to read moron. Thank god you’re not on a jury 😂 because you can’t even comprehend a sentence
@@RationalNon-conformist Ps I don’t have feelings about Karen Read, I don’t even know her. But what I am going off is her multiple different stories, her behavior, the hard evidence against her and the multiple witnesses who were actually there that night! Shes a guilty bitch
Can’t believe so many believe her innocence 😮…defense lawyers must have good evidence and good at their job.
I guess I need to research this case.. confused as hell
They buy into the defense attorney's painting for the narrative
No evidence that anyone in the house had anything against victim. Why did they beat him? Does not make any sense.
This is completely irrational - A cover-up with multiple law enforcement agencies involved and dozens of officers involved? Seriously? The officers investigating the case didn't know John or the people inside that house. But somehow in the few hours after he was killed, they were able to persuade unknown investigatirs to cover this up???
And how did she go from him not being home to looking around in the snow? I don't think that I would jump to that conclusion - I would assume he's with someone somewhere in their house sleeping it off. You would think of who he can be with or whose house and how he got there. She knows she hit him - she knew and that's why she knew to look for him outside in the snow, otherwise she ou would call everyone and go to everyone homes, you wouldn't think of searching outside until later. And...why would the people inside the house have confronted him as soon as he entered the home? This defense is one of the most ridiculous I've heard. She hit him, she even even admitted to women she was with when she allegedly wondered out loud if she hit him. Again...why would she even think of saying she hit him if she hadn't hit him. That wouldn't have been a question in her mind
Dozens of officers involved? There was less than a half dozen that processed the scene, and they all knew who's house it was, and many of them knew who the victim was. As for actually processing the crime scene they did a completely despicable job. Also worth noting the only evidence they found after all the officers searched the area that day was a peice of a clear pint glass. It wasn't until days later an officer happened to be driving by and saw his missing shoe, his missing hat, and over 40 pieces of red taillight. How do 6 police officers search an area and come up with just a piece of glass, but not all the other things which would be easily seen in contrast with the snow?
@@JoexWalsh Because everything was covered in a blizzard of snow and things were revealed as the snow melted. Don't you get it?
The officer's knew each other
@@dawnmills6755 Don't you wish all murders had such a competent, professional, and non-biased investigators?! Can't see over 40 pieces of red tail light in white snow, but can find it in the grass days later, under where his body would have been. She must of hit him so hard that the tail light fragments when right through him without causing any exit wounds! Incredible! You are awfully dense my friend 🤣
Proctor is a family friend of the people in the house what are you talking about!?
She doesn’t seem sad at all……she probably doesn’t even remember that night. 9 drinks for someone that size!
You kind of made a contradiction, if she was drunk and doesn’t remember, she definitely is filled with regret! Because she is sober now! She’s pissed! She cannot even grieve properly! I’d be pissed! And normally you don’t have defendants speak to the public. Also, we don’t know how many drinks she has had, pure speculation, they were also bar hopping, it wasn’t like the bartender at one bar counted the drinks, because she was BAR HOPPING. She is making sure Justice is served.
I've suffer a lot of lost in my life. It still makes me very sad at times. But I can tell people the stories without getting emotional or visibly sad.
@@JAJJABLOG No, it's you who are making contradictory statements. She "is filled with regret" and "she is pissed!" If she was BAR HOPPING, she had A LOT OF DRINKS! Probably to avoid being cut off.
@@priscillamichel4797very true. My some died in 2017. For years I couldn’t even talk about him without falling apart. Now, I’ve trained myself to block out all thoughts and emotions. People are so ridiculous judging other based only on their reactions. We are all different!!