What a poorly planned or rehearsed opening statement... The defense did an incredible opening but this is just despicable for the State. How they could go forth to try her is beyond me. Shameful. The only thing I got out of the states opening statement was a good nap.
Mr. Prosecutor. Tooooooo many characters to keep up with in your opening. Tooo confusing. Just give basics and introduce them as needed when witnesses. 😡
@@2bcYT check Barry Morphew's civil action against the state for his false arrest, failure to provide him with exculpatory evidence etc. The guy was in custody for a long period of time before the Prosecution decided to drop the case, which was without prejudice meaning they can bring the prosecution again. The Prosecution also LIED to court claiming they knew where the body of his wife was. Her body was found ACCIDENTALLY when there was a search for another body. Legal fees are COMPENSATORY damages - what the victim actually lost. I am not sure about the law in MA on emotional distress etc. However PUNITIVE damages which is generally much higher will likely be fair game with the CORRUPTION involved
@@ktermalkut8332 Hey. Yes, well aware of the Suzanne Morphew murder. She was trying to leave her SO when she died, too. Barry never had a murder trial. Apples and Oranges. Karen will be convicted and she can appeal the jury's decision or she'll be acquitted. In which case, she should thank TB for witness tampering.
Opening statements need to be succinct, with the summary of the alleged crime. This is not what is happening. Way too many details out of order that are irrelevant to the main charge.
Oof. Didn’t Lally run this by anyone before “sort of” formally presenting this opening statement ! Are all of his opening statements this incoherent - or just this one?
Their better be blood evidence on under car on him but still never have her in car running him over maybe she did bad investigation. But people in house had nothing to do with it
I think it's a terrible accident. She was drunk, backed the truck a bit, didn't know she hit him or bumped him since he was still holding his glass, and he was also intoxicated, probably dazed and wandering in the snow.
What a poorly planned or rehearsed opening statement... The defense did an incredible opening but this is just despicable for the State. How they could go forth to try her is beyond me. Shameful. The only thing I got out of the states opening statement was a good nap.
So embarrassing for the State
The lack of confidence 😂
Mr. Prosecutor. Tooooooo many characters to keep up with in your opening. Tooo confusing. Just give basics and introduce them as needed when witnesses. 😡
Karen Read has an EXCELLENT attorney. I watched him destroy the firefighter and cops' fake evidence!
Who will foot Karen's legal Bill when she's found not guilty?...
she can bring a civil suit against the state for negligent prosecution
@@ktermalkut8332 That is false. Anyone who is arrested under a Probable Cause Indictment cannot sue anyone including the State or the Common Wealth.
@@2bcYT check Barry Morphew's civil action against the state for his false arrest, failure to provide him with exculpatory evidence etc. The guy was in custody for a long period of time before the Prosecution decided to drop the case, which was without prejudice meaning they can bring the prosecution again.
The Prosecution also LIED to court claiming they knew where the body of his wife was. Her body was found ACCIDENTALLY when there was a search for another body.
Legal fees are COMPENSATORY damages - what the victim actually lost. I am not sure about the law in MA on emotional distress etc. However PUNITIVE damages which is generally much higher will likely be fair game with the CORRUPTION involved
@@ktermalkut8332 Hey. Yes, well aware of the Suzanne Morphew murder. She was trying to leave her SO when she died, too.
Barry never had a murder trial. Apples and Oranges.
Karen will be convicted and she can appeal the jury's decision or she'll be acquitted. In which case, she should thank TB for witness tampering.
@@ktermalkut8332Wrong.
Opening statements need to be succinct, with the summary of the alleged crime. This is not what is happening. Way too many details out of order that are irrelevant to the main charge.
This prosecutor should have just got to the point.....too much info on people we don't need to know
Shockingly weak opening.
He knows that he will fail...Auntie Bev knows it too...she keeps being biased anyways 😂😂
Right? It's giving Public Defender
Most boring opening statements ever...and annoying
By this opening statement, I’m assuming you now realize you have been lied to!
He seems bored with this
This prosecutor just lost his case....
Those poor kids.
They observed karens car and said john never came in the house, so why is their no conversation to john or karen why he did not come in the house?
Wow, not even close dude
Prosecutor is rambling on ☹️☹️☹️
Free Karen read🙏🏻🩷🙏🏻🩷🩷
Oof. Didn’t Lally run this by anyone before “sort of” formally presenting this opening statement ! Are all of his opening statements this incoherent - or just this one?
I was watching this and I started to day dream. I missed half of what he said. Very monotone.
Well a lot change lally hope you read this I curse your tongue for all the lies you told!
Boring and terrible !
Their better be blood evidence on under car on him but still never have her in car running him over maybe she did bad investigation. But people in house had nothing to do with it
LALLY WHACKER IS A TOOL
Omg this gave me a headache
I think it's a terrible accident. She was drunk, backed the truck a bit, didn't know she hit him or bumped him since he was still holding his glass, and he was also intoxicated, probably dazed and wandering in the snow.
Does this mean you’re not going to bother watching the trial ? Or are you just not interested there are two sides to every argument?
Disbar Lally!!!