SECURITY TRY TO FALSELY IMPRISON ME!! Kingswood Civic Centre & Police Station
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- What is going on everybody, this is TGA, in today's video, I head down to Kingswood with the intention of filming Avon and Somerset Police, I head inside a public building, and security tries to trap me inside and falsely imprison me, this was shocking, I'd like to see what you all think as well. Enjoy.
Unbelievable! I can't believe a security guard is actually tried to detain a member of the public!!!
He should be reported to the SIA!
Report to the police. False imprisonment / kidnapping.
@@Nickle314 Like the Police care. They do a lot of false imprisonment themselves!
@Red Tiger love the channel name bud 👊
@@adrenalinejunkie3828 you obviously didn't watch the video. He ran out when the guy tried to grab him and he stood in front of him when he tried to walk down the street.
Clearly the council have been caught with their pants down on a serious issue like this and a full investigation needs to be open up on this breach and on the security of this building. What is really worrying is how many councils are operating like this?
yep, am writing a breach report to ICO
And what will happen as always is Mr A Turpin will be investigated by Mr B Turpin.
He put hands on, he committed assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
yep they all act this way; basically they think they are above the law and superior to the public
Big props to the professional lady on the Police front desk. Smiley, friendly, open, willing to help....Well done, lady ❤❤❤
Someone needs to let the security guard know that he doesn’t have the power of detainment or arrest. 🤡
If he has the badge he was told (trained). He’s out of control - and has committed offences, thus should be reported and have his badge removed.
Yes, he does - citizen's arrest! 🙃
@@adrenalinejunkie3828 Power vs. authority vs. Ability. Have a little think. (Actually).
And let's not forget there are boundaries he/they have to adhere to ie thresholds , so once out of the building they/he has no authority?
@@TallSilentGuy But in this incident he did not carry out a citizens arrest
Kingswood civic centre mangement will have to act on this incident.
The SIA will also have to act if it is reported to them.
The lady who asked the security guard to detain you is a prime candidate for dismissal. And the other lady needs training on GDPR to continue in her job...Follow this through Gwent Auditor...
Security needs to learn the law and the management need to protect the public data, great video as always keep up the good work you do!
the workers are paid for muscle, not brains
If the 1st council employee "understands" why the organisation has to protect data, why doesn't she accept their failure knowing the data could be seen in the public arena? As for the pathetic security guard who obviously isn't trained at all causing fear alarm and distress by trying to falsely imprison a person....
common assault, make sure you get him sacked
Shut up you idiot
if anyone put hands on you, fall to the ground screaming "he broke my arm" then when they say "I barely touched him" you have them admitting to going hands on, powerful evidence for a civil suit!
Love it. You probably never seen anything, but they go into panic mode, in case you did. Lol. Ffs hide the screen, it's simple.
Report this to them and they’ll brush it under the rug. Record the evidence and report it to the relevant authority.
Just love the way their faces drop after they all spin their famous line "Can I ask you to stop filming please ☺" and they hear "No" they all go 😑 🤣
The state of British security these days
Shocking isn’t it
That security guard needs to be retrained before someone rocks his world lmao
She should be sacked for telling that goon to stop you from leaving the building.
Agreed, if TGA sends a complaint in (half way through the vid) i’d bet she does. *edit not suggesting he sends one thats his choice*
Your right my, mate
Why are you following the security guards orders and going where he tells you to?
Because he's shit scared
I wasn’t
He told me to stay in the building and I left. Pay attention to the video
Yet again a other great video and a so called Secruity guard putting hands on a member of the public and in a public place
15:00 Stopping a person from moving where they want is unlawful detainment. Common law allows a citizen's arrest but it has to be for an indictable offence. Detaining someone whilst waiting for the police for something so minor and so obviously not a indictable offence is an offence in itself. The police won't do anything in this situation since it won't be in the public interest to proceed with a prosecution. However that doesn't absolve his employer from any liability from his actions, especially if he was told to detain TGA.
Not much violence other than physical contact (assault and battery) so not not a high claim, but still worth claiming a few hundred with a simple letter before action setting out the situation, the evidence you have, the evidence you require from them (CCTV, written policies, etc) and the damages you claim for the offences and the mental stress that you suffered.
Cheers to The Gwent Auditor for a great video 👍🏼
27:30 Doesn't sound like he's so convinced that he's right since if that was the case he'd have no problem in giving his SIA number. Hiding it means he knows he's fucked up, big style. And he's hoping that by not showing it he won't get any issues. However he's stupid since it just harms his defence and sending a picture of his face to the civic centre and asking for his details as part of some claim before action means they are legally obligated to divulge that information. So hiding the SIA number gets him nowhere.
As soon as that security guy put his hands on you, you should have pushed him away and warned him not to assault you and that you feared for your safety, If he touches you again you have the legal right to use reasonable force
Don’t be silly. That’s terrible advice. He was in no physical damage. It was not an assault to cause injury. Responding physically should always be a last resort. GWA handled it perfectly… he helped calm down the situation.
Just because you may have a legal right to use force in self defence - it’s all in the “may”. That’s a legal definition so you better be sure you know when a forceful self defence is legal.
@@TimothyBushell before you go spouting legal definitions you might want to look it up, simply putting your hands on someone, or taking their personal belongings can and IS classified as assault and or trespass to the person (if you were to take their phone or camera) that IS the legal definition.
@@offgridgoldau before you reply you should read my comment properly. It is an assault to merely touch someone. But it’s not an aggravated assault. Assaults in the UK are a spectrum. There are many cases where self defence has not been accepted.
@@TimothyBushell that's why I said push him away ,I never said hit him .
If a security guard touches you or tries to stop you and you have done nothing wrong it is classed as a false or wrongful arrest and you can use reasonable force against it .
Pushing someones hand off you or away from you can not be seen as excessive force when they are breaking the law by detaining and assaulting you!
@@Mrleejunman if you pushed away when it wasn’t necessary, you’d be escalating. That’s my point. And it clearly wasn’t necessary.
Videos like this really highlight the fact that the licences security goons in this country are truly clueless!
Bloke with a one week £500 training course and laminate badge with his name on it really shouldn't be going hands on with random members of the public and ordering them about. The outcome could have gone horribly wrong for both parties.
3 days at most which all the info fits into a day really and a few questions at the end of it and now a first aid course must be done also
Tga isn't a random
He's a taffy BA BA. Lover
This is pointless, you either use reasonable force on the no-mark of a security guard or just keep following his directive like a lost puppy. You told him to stop giving you orders, yet when he says jump, you are totally compliant.
You call him the rights abuser, yet you’re quite happy to let him. Either bundle him out of the way, knowing he has no rights of detainment or just do what you did and let him walk all over you.
Hes a numpty eh
It was a bit disappointing to see you comply with the guard after the initial wall out. He is now empowered.
Shocking conduct. Prosecutable.
“I don’t want you to leave the building”! Hold on darling, you need to have a word with yourself.
Then try to entice him back onto their turf, for a grilling, where likely again, they'll pressure him to delete images, and make it difficult for him to leave.
Auditor. You need to" buddy up" for a while ,you can record each other getting abused if need be,
I am very glad that they are all very worried about what you are going to do with the data that they have already let out into the public domain. Shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted and trying to lay the blame at the auditors door when it lays firmly in their hands.
The main problem with GDPR is that the people who are responsible for it are the ones that don’t fully understand it.
Stay safe out there TGA 👊
By hanging around you effectively allowed them to detain you
You clearly have zero clue about the auditing agenda.
All auditors need to blitz this place !
Hi T G A, good work as per usual!, I do wonder if the computer screens you can see from outside are actually displaying protected data, GDPR only applies to particular personal information, it is possible to have all sorts of other non-confidential information on screen without breaking any rules.
The new worker at the desk tells you she cannot answer your question because she is so new there!, has she not had any induction training?. Regardless she does seem to be a very much more sensible person than many, presumably she is not inclined to feel paranoid and suspicious of cameras.
The same cannot be said of the demented Carlos, I would be tempted to tell people like him that you do indeed have permission to film there, your mother told you it is perfectly O K!.
The manager woman is polite enough but does not understand that it is their duty to protect private data but they cannot do that by proscribing the activities of members of the public.
I do hope that as a result of your good work here today that the staff there will do a much better job of finding out what they are allowed to do, how and why.
Not only do security workers have no powers of arrest they have no powers at all out-side the building.
The woman then tries to explain herself along the lines of her lack of understanding, what puzzles me is how does she think that is any concern of yours!. I am sure that subject to a sensible contractual arrangement you might be inclined to explain it all and train her her properly but there is no good reason for you to do it for nothing.
As it goes she does appear to be listening to and understanding what you do say and I still hope she will learn from it.
The last one also tells you that you are not meant to record inside, as well as repeating the same nonsense about the visible screens. The general levels of ignorance and stupidity are breathtaking!.
I do so love the way people that dispute what you tell them just say that they accept your difference of opinion when you are actually explaining matters of fact!.
Cheers, Richard.
“ i will defend myself”
RUNS OFF hahahahahahahahahah
Am I correct, every police station MUST have a copy of PACE codes A -G available on site to look at. Not to take away?
In custody,if you're unfortunate enough to end up in
@@SnakePliskin762 That doesn't answer the question.
@@stuartb4525 well it does really
@@SnakePliskin762 In custody you are entitled to a copy to read. However the legislation states that a copy must be available at any front desk for any member of the public at any time. The legislation was written before the internet and the world wide web but its still in place so the police must follow the law and have a copy available and not just fob someone off by saying "Google it".
You definitely have to sue and get a settlement atleast! Do not let it or its employer get away with this as it must be made example of and stopped being permitted to any degree!
This council needs reporting I really hope you do put a report into the relevant organisation. Everyone you interacted with was ego driven and treated you with utter disrespect. Well handled by yourself. I wouldn't hang around I'd just be off all the things they are talking about is their problem.
That Security guard needs sacking NOW!
As a general rule, then, it is legal to film people (including children), buildings, signs, brand logos and events from any public place without having to get permission from anybody. Many people believe they have to give their permission to be filmed but that is not the case!
Good audit TGA, 🤗
That security guard is too used to being a boss in South Africa. Forgets there's no superiority in the UK
Truly incredible and fascinating how these fools cannot see this issue at heart. This ain’t a criticism of you, but I’d love to see you and all others simply refuse to engage with them saying “we’re worried about the data you have captured on your camera and what you will do with it.” and only reply with “your worries shouldn’t be what I’ve captured, but what anyone can view from your constant data breaches that I have documented today. I have seen what anyone coming and going today can view. You should be worried about what one of all those individuals could do with the information, not auditors who are overtly documenting for the sole purpose of stopping these breaches.”
Even here, the first woman sounded concerned but her ‘contacting her manager’ gave suspicion that she was less bothered about their wrongdoing and more bothered about your camera and it’s documentation of that! And of course that’s exactly how it panned out…
That women made that worse 😂 an security turned in rocky 😂 an security need a quick lesson in the law ffs ..great video bruv 👍
Local government are not training their employees properly and third parties have no clue but are employed for the public 🤔
They fought if there was any information leaked, hopefully they will fix the leak, well done TGA...
Another video where you allowed yourself to be bullied. I thought after that Police entrance interaction of a few weeks ago (which you got massive criticism for) you'd got past that. Disappointingly not.
He's just a camera coward
@@DavidMiller-pt5su you're just a bell end 🤣
What do you mean? How was I bullied here?
@@TheGwentAuditorTGA you didn't exactly stand up for yourself against the Security guard. He for want of a better phrase bossed you around - he impeded your movement and you let him. Pretty much everything he wanted you to do you did.
@@richardjones8699 I wouldn’t agree with that, he tried to force me to stay in the building and I didn’t stay there
Surely you'll be taken civil action, do not let this go.
Ladies breach GDPR then instigate a kidnapping to cover up their tracks. Them two ladies don’t even know what GDPR is lol.
Disgraceful ignorant staff and security
“You’ll never meet a nice South African”
@Tim Tam you cheeky monkey!!! Where you from???
Ha! A Spitting Image reference, for those not of a certain age. Almost as good as, “Me, You and my RS232.”
Seems that these people who have and use your personal information have no idea of how to keep it secure or any idea of the law. The SIA training standards need to review their curriculum.
Don't tell them you will blur anything out. That causes problems. "We are not really sure what to do". Bleeding find out then first! Don't tell them what you are going to do.
Exactly because if someone if someone who's data that is sees it or the cammer contacts that person explaining the situation can land them in bigger trouble if the persons whos data has been breached also complains to the ICO with evidence or heaven forbid if someone with malicious intentions sees it and acts then they are in even deeper trouble.
Wow not going to lie mate you handled that better than i would of great video mate 👍
Thanks so much Kev, he was a right joker
would have *😉
Lawsuit mate 👌
well done; will go there later to track down that guard and mock him. Mebies you should have allowed him to wrestle you tut ground and then made a compensation claim.
Kingswood is only under south glos council - not n/somerset.....Bristol boundary is about half a mile away from k/wood. N Somerset border is maybe 5 miles away.
Take it up with a no win no fee solicitor for assault and unlawful detainment.
How do you think a judge would react to "we'll have to agree to disagree" 🤣🤣
They have breached GDPR you haven't, they tried to detain you illigally to cover up their breach !!! priceless!!
The guard had no SIA on show 😂😂😂
Havent seen Wordy for years, surprised he turned up.
The only response to her should have been "sounds very much like a you problem". Carlos the security guy needs a good slap, which with that attitude, I'm sure it won't be long until someone obliges.
Brill, exposing idiots we pay for.😊
How did we ever manage without all these tyrannical guards who have fled to this country from tyranny to impose the very same thing they have escaped from.
Just another incarnation of Prof. Dr. R. C Whole...
You may as well have just bent over for that security guard and let him do what he wants!
You did everything he told you to, you might have said no to him but you still did what he ordered you to do!
And the auditor calls the security guard a muppets 😆😆
@@nokianige I call people like you muppets ALL the time lol
Great video.
Wow, this is a beaut.
Compensation =£234,000.
Security Guard = Prison Sentence.
Police lady working the counter is now only the 4th that has acted so very professional. 😇🤩
It is not the Public's Responsibility to Train and Educate Public Sector workers....large amounts of Taxes are provided for the relevant Departments to do that.
great vid. you should have told them they will be reported to the ico for data breaches & you will send the ico the recorded breaches & now that you have informed them, they themselves have 7 days to report the data breach. that would have shut them right up & they would have slinked off quick sticks
I used to live right by this building and I had to go there to sign up to the housing benefit department and I was at the point volunteering for the salvation army and a local hostel in South Gloucestershire Bristol there was a sign poster on the notice board advertising helping people with drugs and alcohol problems I innocently wanted to take a photo of the notice board and in the second of doing so I was gripped by the security who aggressively pushed me out the building they were very abusive acting exactly how they were in this situation disgusting behaviour #pinac keep up the good fight for excerising your rights 👊👍❤️
These ladies need to get a grip on their place in society
I would have ironed him out. He has no right to hold you prisoner.
I can't believe how pathetic and ignorant those two Karen's are. As for the security guard, he needs sacking and a ankle bracelet.
COMPLAINTS HAVE TO BE MADE -------- ON THE GOON TO THE SIA AND ON THE COUNCIL STAFF TO MANAGER AND ON THE COUNCIL TO GDPR AUTHORITY===========
Hey Gwent, I've worked in both industries that have abused you and I want to give you some advice.
I used to work in retail security and I know that a security guard can't hold you unless the suspect you of committing a crime and only then they have the same citizens arrest powers of any other civilian like you or I.
I also worked in finance for a merchant bank dealing with GDPR as part of my duties.
The complete onus on confidential data is the data handles, IE in this case the council. If you've managed to record any confidential information, I would without delay hand it to the ICO the information Commissioner Office.
If you have been recorded by any recording device whether it be body worn cameras or internal cameras, put in an SAR or a Subject Access Request for the footage.
Also report the security guard to the SIA and to the police and hand them the footage you've recorded as it's a criminal offence not to have his badge on display at all times.
They'll probably not do anything about it, but it's worth trying.
Regards
Has the law been changed on filming inside public buildings? I saw this on a police website ""There will be places where you have access as a member of the public, but will have to ask permission or may be prevented altogether from taking images. These could include stately homes, museums, churches, shopping malls, railway stations/airports and council/government buildings""
Hmm, I’ll have to look in to this, but then again it’s not law. Railway stations have guidelines on the Network Rail website regarding filming that is not on behalf of a company. Government buildings are paid for by the public and they are open to the public, surely anyone can film somewhere like that, same as being stood on the pavement
@@TheGwentAuditorTGA yes I agree we should be allowed to film anywhere that's publicly accessible, it just seems the police have quietly added this onto their websites now that officers are being exposed for harassing and intimidating the public.
Sadly the first security guard hasn’t a clue and in fact committed an offence of common assault and freedom of movement of the auditor was restricted. Maybe it’s because he’s a foreigner I don’t know but, he doesn’t know the law. Also the second security guard started off ok, then sadly showed why the public have little sympathy towards taking them seriously as he didn’t know that filming in a public building or a publicly accessible building is the same as filming outside in the public…it’s perfectly fine and not against the law. GDPR sensitive material has to be covered up from the public, not the other way around. Sadly this Council and these employees are pathetic.
To the lady on the police counter 👍 job well done. To the others at Kingswood Civic Center. You by your actions have ISSUED AN OPEN INVITATION TO ALL AUDITORS AND DRONE OPERATORS TO COME VISIT ANYTIME DAY OR NIGHT UNTIL YOU RESPECT THE LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS. @17.30 they have committed a violation and now want to sit down and talk about it because you have evidence.
What a nice a pair she has talk about weapons of mass distraction!!
Good views on this video 10 k now ! Do more companies too mate
council dont have a clue and the security is as bad . people need to take action against both not keep saying they will , Do it
They are so concerned about a gdpr breach but gdpr was breached the moment you saw the data! The recording is simply evidence of the breach by those members of staff.. Jeeez 🤷🤦🤷🤦, & you can't agree to disagree on feelings where facts are given.
For a person trained in GDPR, which all public employees should legally be, its actually a prosecutable offence under GDPR to misquote, incorrectly apply or even try to incorrectly GDPR. As such all the security & other employees in this vid should be reported for breaches of GDPR and be facing prosecution accordingly.
17:05 GDPR requires the organisation to protect data. But not by restricting the activities of people unnecessarily and infringing on their rights.
Think it through, look up the Article 10 restrictions.
@@Audit-The-Auditors None of the restrictions mean that some company can abuse someone's rights to protect the data they hold. The organisation must protect the data from the public and from other members of the organisation who are not entitled to see it.
@@TheSadButMadLad Faces are personal data, so explain how you protect people from being recorded and that information from being uploaded to social media?
@@Audit-The-Auditors Well obviously since social media exists and it's full of people's faces, many of whom didn't give permission, it means there is nothing that can be done about it.
@@TheSadButMadLad You either play Devil's Advocate or simply do not realise that the staff in such establishments, are actively doing something to observe their GDPR obligations by approaching someone filming.
Sounds like these two ladies were more concerned to blame the auditor, for capturing data, rather than address their potential breach of GDPR.
Ffs was about to go to bed lol.
You should have played around with the clown a bit more, like crossing the roads and pretending to leg it 😂
That One Stop Shop manager needs to be sacked first, she gave the security guard illegal instructions to keep the auditor in the building and make sure he does not leave.
The guard would not have done what he did if was not instructed to do it.
The guard also needs to be sacked for gross violation of his SIA conduct and his One Stop Shop security duties.
No doubt also an investigation will be opened by the Council in regard to their staff's data breach.
Absolutely numpty security as usual, Take this further…..not just to the SIA, that is common assault so you should have phoned the police straight away.
Something tells me you wont do shit tho.
10:00 God forbid anyone sees you at a library 😁
close down all criminal and corrupt councils
Oi Copper - Agree to disagree? Not at all, agree to agree you are as smart as a door nail and its pointless trying to educate the uneducated.
I hate to point out that at about the halfway point of your video when the security guard asked you to come across the car park and stand closer to the building, what he was doing was trying to get you closer to the CCTV cameras in order to capture your image for their records. This is clearly in an attempt to either identify you or to attempt to ban you from the property as an uncooperative individual. I would suggest that you contact the property manager and ask for their reasons for this action and to request that they give you control of the footage or delete all such videos that you are pictured on.
Very bad look for the council, workers
are clowns and need training
Lady on the front desk is a credit to the service
Carlos the Bellend.
I have an old saying. "If in doubt , do nowt" , that would apply in this case.
Wow, i guess they don't look for the brightest employees at Kingswood.
That fkn guard pissed me off
"Let's agree to disagree", that well known legal argument used by all top barristers. You may as well discuss GDPR with a dog rather than the guy with the orange security vest.