Hi I'm ibrahim wisdom from Nigeria, right now I fund is video help but in addition here Nigeria we're using Adobe premiere pro mostly and for modeling blender and Maya..
the good thing is that the real high end products like nuke fusion and flame are all relatively similar in structure. Many Nodes have the same name and most function the same. Best is to learn one of these three really good. then switching isn't the worst thing in the world. I chose fusion because its free if you have a da Vinci resolve studio license and it has better performance on consumer workstations.
I Use Blender for modeling, ZBrush for Sculpting, Maya for Rigging & Animate, Nuke for Composite, Houdini for VFX. Render Use Renderman. Sometime I use Unreal Engine too for some project.
@@federicasartori1683 I'm beginner, about 3 month I use Maya for animate & rig. Maya, blender, cinema4D, 3dsmax, solidworks, fusion360, rhino, sketchup, all 3d software is same. I mean, if we know just 1 like blender, very easy to mastering other 3d software. Only Houdini is different from all. All software require base knowledge in C/C++ & Python.
Im trying to get back into VFX but i dont really want to waste my time, should i just learn stuff in AE and Blender and if i like it i could try Nuke and do a course with that?
I was afraid of using Nuke as i found it hard to learn back when i was a student. Almost a decade later, can't think of compositing passes anywhere else.
Hm, the scenes from "man in the high castle" was rendered in Blender but composited in Nuke. There is anywhere a interview with the studio members about their pipeline between Blender and Nuke.
@@InspirationTuts Blender is always ranks high on the; "Render capabilities" thats why! And with UE5 right around the corner by end of year,... oh boy!!!
Blender is sick to use because its one of those programs Mike?, Many use but can have their workflow go from Blender into others or into Blender, once one task is accomplished in other program and passed to blender for whatever needs it requires. Blender and Maya for example gel well together, as does Nuke and Blender etc's. One tool can handle one function while another is use for something else entirely (modeling/sculpting, compositing, colour correction, editing) etc's.
I was planning to take a vfx course....the software which they use in this course is nuke.....should i take it....? Will i have a better career...? Pls respond
Nuke is an industry standard when comes to compositing. Most of the big studio uses nuke. Nuke is node based, so you can also transfer some of the workflow to other node based tools like Fusion.
The nitron is a pity, is a very good software but now any company support it. Now They are looking for new developer. I hope that another company or de community get to maintain this project.
Hi guys !!! I am actually a 3d modeller , wanna learn compositing for just fun , so I can not afford nuke , so I was thinking about learning natron ...
@@swapnanilnag3713 Get Nuke non commercial. Free, no watermarks, only a few nodes unavailable. Only big limitation is max resolution of 1920x1080, but that's plenty big enough for learning.
Hey, A few thoughts as a Fusion and Mocha Pro user (and Resolve btw) for matte painting, 3d set extensions, camera projections etc... 1/ By far the 1st feeling : can't believe I still can read AE in any of these kind of serious lists... AE is mainstream garbage maintained by Adobe to entertain their customers. Anybody knows it doesn't play in the same league as Maya, Fusion or Nuke, and btw anybody knows that ANY layer based software can't compete with node-based ones... The main and only asset of AE is there is a huge community... because beginners first start downloading AE as the did for PS, but only the second one is serious in the end ;) 2/ Advice for beginners : if you really want to start/study/evolve, forget about AE and dl DaVinci Resolve which includes a Fusion tab. Buy studio versions only if you'd like to, no subscription, work and learn without limiting constraints (up to UHD)... And please, forget about AE even if the little bro of your neighbour stated he's starting a new blockbuster on it... or stay stuck on it for life, with opening and opening and opening again a composition in a composition in another one in a "I don't remember what down floor" my layer is hahahahaha ;) 3/ Personal opinions, no regular rule : a/ where's Maya ? b/ Fusion could deserve better in many cases
Hi Dark, what about 2D motion graphics/design? You know like titles, shapes, lines, curves, graphs etc.. Wouldn't you say that AE is best for that kind of use, especially for designers coming from Illustrator? Cheers.
@@charlesxchaves It does, but what about ease of use and integration with Illustrator? AE has potentially huge benefits there. That's why I'm trying to get opinions from knowledgeable people who used both apps extensively. I'm not interested in fanboy opinions which tend to dominate these discussions.
@@PeterKoperdan Well I can undestand what you mean. Honnestly you can do that in Nuke or Fusion as well (I use Apple Morion for this). But you're right, layer based as PS or AI users will fel immediately comfortable... and won't ever progress and upgrade their skills sadly
Hi Bro, I am a graphic designer doing Photo Editing, Video Editing, and After Effects. I am Learning 3d Animation Also, Kindly advise the Processor for my new PC build. I want to use After Effects, Premiere Pro, Autodesk Maya, Blender. i9-9900k or AMD 3900x...
@@ismaelvsano you can download crack version of after effects, many websites have it. But i wouldn't recommend using it professionally, you can use it to learn.
Finally get the video i was asking mans for, and i was away for a few days vomiting? Don't worry i don't think it was Covid-19, just bad dieting at its worse. Wasn't so good for the last few days but i'm alright now. No dizziness or loss of smelling or anything. Glad InspirationTuts came through, alot of people are learning off of him and making plans to set up their own studios at home i reckon! thumbs up you more than deserve it! These videos are just as good as "Porn", cos we know we're getting something great out of them and learning new tricks right! (Lmao) Sorry but i have a devilish sense of humor sometimes man! Stay safe dude, and cheers man.
If you ever want a real job in the VFX or 3D animation industry you learn Nuke. End of the story. Learning anything else is just a waste of your time, since even if you master your compositing software of choice, no studios will hire you or you'll end up using Nuke anyway. If you want motion graphics job you learn After Effects. Same as Nuke in VFX: you can do motion graphics with many other software sometimes even more capable than AE, but studios that have already invested into AE will not replace their tools just for your needs. And they invest in AE since most motion graphics artist learn AE... closed circle. If you just wanna play around with hobby projects, it's Blender if full 3D or Natron if 2D footage involved. Natron has a Nuke-like user interface so if you look for a free alternative to learn the basics of compositing then it could be a good start since it is easy to switch to Nuke if you take things seriously later. (And Nuke is ridiculously expensive while it's learning edition is too limited.)
I get that Natron is fo 2D and 2.5D compisiting, but is it really just the basics of compositing, or does it also have some moderately advanced and useful capabilities as a 2D compositor?
For 3D and bitmap support Fusion studio 9 ftw, sorry nuke studio... to expensive and the fact that it doesn’t support bitmap is definitely not worth 10000$☹️
mocha pro is a planar tracker. It cames as standalone or plugin for ae or even as osx for fusion or Nuke. Its very intuitive in use and faster and accurater than the build in tracker in ae for example. But its only usable for planar tracking as the name say. 3d tracking is not possible with that. So if you want to place a video on a tv or a image on a wall, then mocha is your tool. If you want to track a scene with a camera wich is moving around in a scene and then want to place a robot or what ever, then you need a 3d tracker.
After Effects can definitely be used to create high-quality composites without a doubt, but it certainly limits the ease-of-use of certain things that node based compositors such as Nuke have. To achieve the best results in After Effects, fully understanding precompositions is a must. In AE there is actually a project flowchart that helps illustrate how your comps stack together, somewhat like a node graph of sorts, for a better visual if it's hard to comprehend. Complex dynamic compositing is definitely achievable without any third-party plugins for the software. It just takes more time and understanding of how it all works. If only Nuke were a truly affordable alternative to Adobe... someday, maybe.... :)
@@JJ_Lawson_VFX interesting information ,i find layer based compositing easier than node based but that just me and yeah people who have switched over to nuke havnt turned back
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
7. NATRON
6. HIT FILM PRO
5. BLENDER
4. AFTER EFFECTS
3. FUSION
2. FLAME
1. NUKE
I prefer Hitfilm over AE lol
Houdini has been forgotten?
Natron and blender are better than Ae
Hey guys pls
Help me
How can I start with Nuke any YT channel?
It's funny to see Adobe Premier advert in this video, made me laugh :-D
Best for composting
Lmao
I would definitely add Red Giant alongside After Effects. With it After Effects become really strong for Indie artists.
Big-ups to Natron making the list.
Natron and After effects 💪😎👍
Nice video bro. 😉👍
men u are a hero ... you always guide me for what I learn next ... thank u tooooooo match
Hi I'm ibrahim wisdom from Nigeria, right now I fund is video help but in addition here Nigeria we're using Adobe premiere pro mostly and for modeling blender and Maya..
the good thing is that the real high end products like nuke fusion and flame are all relatively similar in structure. Many Nodes have the same name and most function the same.
Best is to learn one of these three really good. then switching isn't the worst thing in the world.
I chose fusion because its free if you have a da Vinci resolve studio license and it has better performance on consumer workstations.
is it me or finding tutorials for Nuke is like finding vibranium in real life
You should watch "hugo's desk" channel 😎
Been waiting for this, thank you!
No problem!
I Use Blender for modeling, ZBrush for Sculpting, Maya for Rigging & Animate, Nuke for Composite, Houdini for VFX. Render Use Renderman. Sometime I use Unreal Engine too for some project.
@Riubotin how much have you spent for maya?
@@federicasartori1683 I'm beginner, about 3 month I use Maya for animate & rig. Maya, blender, cinema4D, 3dsmax, solidworks, fusion360, rhino, sketchup, all 3d software is same. I mean, if we know just 1 like blender, very easy to mastering other 3d software. Only Houdini is different from all. All software require base knowledge in C/C++ & Python.
why is flame 8:00 not available for Windows?
Needed this!
Im trying to get back into VFX but i dont really want to waste my time, should i just learn stuff in AE and Blender and if i like it i could try Nuke and do a course with that?
THNK U SO MUCH NOW IAM USING AFTEREFFECT CS6 FOR MY PC
Nuke has a free non commercial version though
i use fusion at the moment but im planning to switch to nuke
Care to explain why? I edit with Resolve and I plan to learn Fusion. Should I learn Nuke instead?
Nuke looks great I would live to learn it
I’m using shake 4.1 it’s still amazing software
Lol
You just made my day bro
What about Unreal Engine live rendering? For TV apears to be very promising
I was afraid of using Nuke as i found it hard to learn back when i was a student. Almost a decade later, can't think of compositing passes anywhere else.
awesome content thank for that!!! my question is wich program is the best for beginners??
Start with something like premiere pro or hit film, then, once your really good at those, move on to things like after effects and blender
11 Minutes Master Lesson
I can see blender and nuke compositers being used together
@DFaking facts
Maya & nuke
I am thankful that I created these videos, I like them. I have one request help us create one movie trailer like marvel
Very good video.
I'm new to vfx compositing and I'm studying nuke. what other software would be interesting at this moment?
nuke is the king of compositing
Price never lie
great video, man what about unreal angine ??
Hm, the scenes from "man in the high castle" was rendered in Blender but composited in Nuke. There is anywhere a interview with the studio members about their pipeline between Blender and Nuke.
yes, Barnstorm VFX use Nuke for post-production even though they use Blender.
@@InspirationTuts Blender is always ranks high on the; "Render capabilities" thats why! And with UE5 right around the corner by end of year,... oh boy!!!
Blender is sick to use because its one of those programs Mike?, Many use but can have their workflow go from Blender into others or into Blender, once one task is accomplished in other program and passed to blender for whatever needs it requires. Blender and Maya for example gel well together, as does Nuke and Blender etc's. One tool can handle one function while another is use for something else entirely (modeling/sculpting, compositing, colour correction, editing) etc's.
I was planning to take a vfx course....the software which they use in this course is nuke.....should i take it....? Will i have a better career...? Pls respond
Nuke is an industry standard when comes to compositing. Most of the big studio uses nuke. Nuke is node based, so you can also transfer some of the workflow to other node based tools like Fusion.
you the truth bro much love
Nice video,,interesting
The nitron is a pity, is a very good software but now any company support it. Now They are looking for new developer. I hope that another company or de community get to maintain this project.
I wish it would be absorbed into Blender.
@@jascrandom9855 same.
Really a good software and also a free alternative of nuke.
Fantastic!
Thanks for this info sir :)
Are dey for PC
Or phones
They are all for phone my man. Don't you notice that in the video ??
pls where can i download the vfx software
Thank you sir
Bro thanks you so much.
Can you make a tutorial maya learn tips and tricks?
Please make many people need.
Check the man's video library on his wonderful channel, he's made tons of these already!
hard to respect a list without c4d on it
This is about Composting, not Motion Graphics
why is a coomercial?
what about clarisse?
thnaks for this
I am a 3D animation student , and fusion is in our syllabus , but this video charged me to learn natron
natron is dead, nobody use it in real production. Learn inudstry standart for compositing - Nuke.
Don't waste your time. Nuke is the one to learn.
Hi guys !!! I am actually a 3d modeller , wanna learn compositing for just fun , so I can not afford nuke , so I was thinking about learning natron ...
@@swapnanilnag3713 Get Nuke non commercial. Free, no watermarks, only a few nodes unavailable. Only big limitation is max resolution of 1920x1080, but that's plenty big enough for learning.
@@PeterJansen oh !!! That sounds good
What about Hitfilm?
Buen video, saludos desde PERÚ :D
thank you very mush
Goes back to making animated gifs.
good client
You are superb
Davinci Resolve vs Baselight vs Autodesk Flame
grading software for smaller studios vs grading software for bigger studios vs finishing software, mainly used for commercials.
thank you...
Hey,
A few thoughts as a Fusion and Mocha Pro user (and Resolve btw) for matte painting, 3d set extensions, camera projections etc...
1/ By far the 1st feeling : can't believe I still can read AE in any of these kind of serious lists... AE is mainstream garbage maintained by Adobe to entertain their customers. Anybody knows it doesn't play in the same league as Maya, Fusion or Nuke, and btw anybody knows that ANY layer based software can't compete with node-based ones... The main and only asset of AE is there is a huge community... because beginners first start downloading AE as the did for PS, but only the second one is serious in the end ;)
2/ Advice for beginners : if you really want to start/study/evolve, forget about AE and dl DaVinci Resolve which includes a Fusion tab. Buy studio versions only if you'd like to, no subscription, work and learn without limiting constraints (up to UHD)... And please, forget about AE even if the little bro of your neighbour stated he's starting a new blockbuster on it... or stay stuck on it for life, with opening and opening and opening again a composition in a composition in another one in a "I don't remember what down floor" my layer is hahahahaha ;)
3/ Personal opinions, no regular rule : a/ where's Maya ? b/ Fusion could deserve better in many cases
Hi Dark, what about 2D motion graphics/design? You know like titles, shapes, lines, curves, graphs etc.. Wouldn't you say that AE is best for that kind of use, especially for designers coming from Illustrator? Cheers.
@@PeterKoperdan resolve fusion has those
@@charlesxchaves It does, but what about ease of use and integration with Illustrator? AE has potentially huge benefits there. That's why I'm trying to get opinions from knowledgeable people who used both apps extensively. I'm not interested in fanboy opinions which tend to dominate these discussions.
You’re the only person I’ve seen that is against After Effects, and I agree with you.
@@PeterKoperdan Well I can undestand what you mean. Honnestly you can do that in Nuke or Fusion as well (I use Apple Morion for this). But you're right, layer based as PS or AI users will fel immediately comfortable... and won't ever progress and upgrade their skills sadly
Great
Hi Bro, I am a graphic designer doing Photo Editing, Video Editing, and After Effects. I am Learning 3d Animation Also, Kindly advise the Processor for my new PC build. I want to use After Effects, Premiere Pro, Autodesk Maya, Blender. i9-9900k or AMD 3900x...
@Glizzster what
Go For 5900X or 3900X
I only do after effects and premier pro for film making but I wanna learn CGI and all that type of stuff
@@n0name is there any way to get after effects for free ?
@@ismaelvsano you can download crack version of after effects, many websites have it. But i wouldn't recommend using it professionally, you can use it to learn.
why not to use a pirated version to learn the softwares if we can't afford to buy one or subscribe to one.
FUSION
what about shake?
It's shame, but it's a dead software for many years.
Pretty cool👌😂
Cool 2 Open Source ones? :D
Finally get the video i was asking mans for, and i was away for a few days vomiting? Don't worry i don't think it was Covid-19, just bad dieting at its worse. Wasn't so good for the last few days but i'm alright now. No dizziness or loss of smelling or anything. Glad InspirationTuts came through, alot of people are learning off of him and making plans to set up their own studios at home i reckon! thumbs up you more than deserve it! These videos are just as good as "Porn", cos we know we're getting something great out of them and learning new tricks right! (Lmao) Sorry but i have a devilish sense of humor sometimes man! Stay safe dude, and cheers man.
What about Autodesk Maya?
It is for 3D modeling and animation. Different purpose.
If you ever want a real job in the VFX or 3D animation industry you learn Nuke. End of the story. Learning anything else is just a waste of your time, since even if you master your compositing software of choice, no studios will hire you or you'll end up using Nuke anyway.
If you want motion graphics job you learn After Effects. Same as Nuke in VFX: you can do motion graphics with many other software sometimes even more capable than AE, but studios that have already invested into AE will not replace their tools just for your needs. And they invest in AE since most motion graphics artist learn AE... closed circle.
If you just wanna play around with hobby projects, it's Blender if full 3D or Natron if 2D footage involved.
Natron has a Nuke-like user interface so if you look for a free alternative to learn the basics of compositing then it could be a good start since it is easy to switch to Nuke if you take things seriously later. (And Nuke is ridiculously expensive while it's learning edition is too limited.)
I get that Natron is fo 2D and 2.5D compisiting, but is it really just the basics of compositing, or does it also have some moderately advanced and useful capabilities as a 2D compositor?
7:54 Fusion no longer has a free version since it is now built right in to Davinci Resolve
Da Vinci resolve is free, wdym?
@@gnd8264 resolve is paid. free version is really limited to basic color grading
@@TigBoss No there is Davinci Resolve, which is free and has fusion built into it, and the paid version is studio.
@@latimerias I didn't say that though. I just said there was a free version.
For 3D and bitmap support Fusion studio 9 ftw, sorry nuke studio... to expensive and the fact that it doesn’t support bitmap is definitely not worth 10000$☹️
What do you mean "bitmap"?
Then what is the use of mocha pro can anyone explain plz
Mainly for Rotoscoping and tracking
mocha pro is a planar tracker. It cames as standalone or plugin for ae or even as osx for fusion or Nuke. Its very intuitive in use and faster and accurater than the build in tracker in ae for example. But its only usable for planar tracking as the name say. 3d tracking is not possible with that. So if you want to place a video on a tv or a image on a wall, then mocha is your tool. If you want to track a scene with a camera wich is moving around in a scene and then want to place a robot or what ever, then you need a 3d tracker.
Good
ADOBE AFTER EFFECTS
from where your getting industry working footages ?
probably from the studios and software channels themselves.
BLENDER
after effects for me ,but ive heard nuke is better
AE is layer-based, which limits it capabilities, but is easier to use. While Nuke is node-based, which makes it more powerful, but harder to learn.
After Effects can definitely be used to create high-quality composites without a doubt, but it certainly limits the ease-of-use of certain things that node based compositors such as Nuke have. To achieve the best results in After Effects, fully understanding precompositions is a must. In AE there is actually a project flowchart that helps illustrate how your comps stack together, somewhat like a node graph of sorts, for a better visual if it's hard to comprehend. Complex dynamic compositing is definitely achievable without any third-party plugins for the software. It just takes more time and understanding of how it all works. If only Nuke were a truly affordable alternative to Adobe... someday, maybe.... :)
@@JJ_Lawson_VFX interesting information ,i find layer based compositing easier than node based but that just me and yeah people who have switched over to nuke havnt turned back
Unfortunately, Natron is just no longer developped
Last commit to Natron's codebase was 3 days ago. What are you talking about buddy?))
@@SlayerDUDE1993 the creator abandoned it
Houdini and Maya ???
+ Zbrush
Adobe After Effects bro.
hi
HIT FILM PRO
Is there anything Blender can't do?
Yes i use blender and it isn’t a daw
Blender isnt good for movies but its good for animations like pixar animations lol .
@@Medgator Why can't it be good for VFX?
@@richard_robert i frgot , it is perfect for both , my bad
4:00
NATRON
66 999 views no way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
$5.5k for Nuke yall gmfu lol