FIRST TIME WATCHING: Law Abiding Citizen (2009) REACTION (Movie Commentary)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2021
- SUPPORT ME ON PATREON - / capedinformer
BUSINESS INQUIRIES - Jlesproject@gmail.com
SOCIAL MEDIA:
INSTAGRAM:
/ jlesproject
/ capedinformer
FACEBOOK: / capedinformer
TWITTER: / capedinformer
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED. All rights belong to their respective owners. 
Кино
One of the best movies with the worst endings . No way Jamie Foxx outsmarts Clyde .
My thoughts exactly.
Totally agree & the thing I didnt like either is that those that actually felt remorse & had little or nothing to do with it died while the cop & Foxx's character who is the most to blame & least remorseful get to live. I'd much rather see both them die more than some other characters. Or if they had to have Clyde die have him kill himself after he killed everybody else except the wife & daughter so he has to live with all those deaths on his conscience. Then he receives a package of all the times clyde couldve taken out his family just to show him how easily it wouldve been to take them out.
Don’t think it was a matter of outsmarting. Clyde just had a 10year lead on Foxx’s character
Clyde was definitely smarter, and the movie literally shows this. Foxx's character would have never got to the bomb without the significant assist from Chester. The 10 year lead was only a bonus for Clyde.
@@CapedInformer no clyde is suppose to be a legitimate super genius who is literally the smartest human in any room he is ever in.
This movie makes the mistake of thinking I want to see Jamie Foxx's character win.
Did he really "win" tho?
@@GanzBestimmt if the movie was realistic? NO in real life he would have been deemed complicit in severa people's death and would have been locked away for life for clyde's murder
The original ending, Foxx’s character did not win. He didn’t want to be seen as the bad guy, so he forced the studio to rewrite the ending so that he lives and movie goers would see him as the hero.
The new ending has him alive, but almost nobody thinks him the hero or cheers him.
Studio should have stuck with the original ending.
@@AT-gh9js Right On!
@@AT-gh9js Foxx "forcing the studio to rewrite the ending" is a myth that has no credible source that just gets spread around on every video about this movie
The first 3/4 of this movie was a masterpiece
This movie is the definition of tripping at the finish line
Would have been so much better if Fox discovers everything but is able to stop him at the end. Shoots him right after he blows everything up
Fuck yea it was
@@zonk3835 If he had shot Clyde he would've been taking justice into his own hands, effectively taking the same path Clyde did. In giving Clyde one last chance to bail out, he had all the power in his own hands. He killed himself. Now, up until that point I kept expecting Clyde to be put on that lethal injection table like the guy at the beginning. Justice was way too lenient for way too long lmao.
Lol in reality he would have won
Fucking nuts, funny and definitely you would too type of thinking 😁👌💨💨💨😎😜🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
_"I'm just gettin' warmed up. This is Von Clausewitz shit total fuckin' war."_ Best line in the movie.
Soon as Jamie said fuck his civil rights, I was like then why you mad at him then?
Nick is sooo two-faced.In the beginning,he was for righteous law,and in the scene where he finds Clyde's place of operation,he say f*** it.He is no Hero especially for what he did before Clyde returned.
@@Karlam20001 I couldn't understand how people could feel remorse for the sicko who got chopped up.
@@Karlam20001 I mean, this is the point, right? In the beginning Nick think that system works, and while you always work by the rules no matter how much damage you cause it's justice, and it's the best you can get, no matter how unfair it seems. Clyde showed him that you have to break the rules sometimes to do what's right and system is not foolproof. But Clyde is not right too, because if you take completely upon yourself to determine justice, it would maybe just for you and harmful for those you deem guilty but who actually innocent, like Nick's assistant lady (forgot her name)
I love the fact that what makes Clyde so deadly isn’t his physicality but his intellect. It’s his ability to plan several steps ahead.
Just FYI. Clyde was the hero, and the ending sucked. Imo, lol
It’s not just your opinion, a lot of people don’t like the ending. Myself included!
I agree.
are you on drugs? he was killing innocent people
@@azazello1784 they weren't innocent
If I remember correctly it wasn't supposed to end like that and Jamie Foxx wanted/demanded that they change it so his character "won" in the end
Jamie Fox's character didn't learn anything about right and wrong until he was pushed into it by his enemy. That was the lesson Gerrard Butler was trying to teach him. Fox's character was more interested in a high prosecution rate at the expense of doing what was right. Our judicial systems are created for the judges and lawyers to make deals while the people they claim to represent, suffer. That's the flaw of the "Legal" system which see people as a commodity, and not a living man or woman.
If Nick had his wife and daughter r'ped and murderered in front of him, and the prosecutor didn't pursue justice, he'd have done the exact same thing as Clyde
(at least the old guy = the DA = Nick's "mentor", got a conscious right before his end, but still not Nick)
@@redmoonbloodmoon3161 to the people that killed his family, maybe. But Clyde went WAY beyond that. None of the killings past the first two were remotely justified.
Yes Jamie foxs character cared about his prosecution rate. But he was also right in that he might have not gotten a conviction on either person if he had t made a deal. Clyde expected perfect justice and such things don’t often exist in a court system that allows for due process. It doesn’t give Clyde the right to kill everyone in the system just because he feels aggrieved. Clyde was actually a worse villain than the people who killed his family. He just justified his villainy by saying he was taking on a corrupt system. But he was a sadistic murderer who treated people who were doing their jobs like they were enemy comabatants. And he learned something in the end too. He could have stopped trying to seek vengeance and he could live, but he brought his own death by going through with his vengeance. And what did it get him? Did he bring down the system? Or did he just show thst he was a terrorist?
@@johnr8095 the problem is. he accepted the criminal offer because he is thinking of of his performance rate and not doing it for Clyde. Nick only chose that decision because of his career not because whats best for clyde. clyde doesnt care about winning or losing. he cares that the lawyer fight for him
@@apizcyril9479 no. Clyde wanted an outcome and he didn’t get it. And what he wanted wasn’t realistic. Nick was a pragmatist and sure he cut deals that helped his career. But he also cut deals because he was trying to get the best possible outcome for his client where he could still win. He got one of the people to be put on death row and executed remember. That’s not nothing.Clyde refused to accept that lawyers have ti work inside a system that constrains them ti some degree. They didn’t create the system they just do their jobs and follow the law.
Clyde punished people who simply did their jobs and followed the law because he didn’t like the system.
Even thiugh one guy was already about to be executed fir the crime (which was because nick was able to get him sentenced) that still wasn’t good enough for Clyde. He had to add punishment on top of the punishment the guy was already receiving (a death sentence) simply because he felt like the law wasn’t good enough. Not good enough? The guy was about to be executed for crying out.
Clyde should have faced jail time for torturing and killing the guy who got off even though I understand why he did it. But he didn’t stop there. He started treating people who simply did their jobs like enemies in a war. He used people to simply as a means to an end simply because he could. The woman he blew up in a car. WhT was her crime? The guy he shanked in prison. What did he do that warranted being shanked? Clyde didn’t care. He just killed people who hew viewed as pawns to be sacrificed to achieve his goal of tearing the system down. Only he didn’t.
All he did was murder a bunch of people because he’s a self righteous megalomaniac military tactician who killed people for a living (some law abiding citizen) and decided to kill ppl who he didn’t think did their jobs good enough for his liking.
He’s a victim who becomes the villain. Rather he was always a villain. But the guys who attacked him picked the wrong person to fuck with. And because nick was unlucky enough to be assigned the case he and his entire team also became victims.
Nick was right to want justice for his daughter and right to fight a Corrupt system or at least a broken system. But not by acting like an executioner.
The problem with this movie isn't so much that Clyde looks like the good guy, it's more that Nick is a terrible protagonist. In the end, he shows no remorse for his actions. Nick somehow wins the cat and mouse game, but he doesn't deserve it.
Maybe because that isn't how the world works...
Clyde doesn’t deserve it. He’s a complete self righteous bastard,who uses the death of his family to commit vicious murders. How is he better than the people who killed his family? He’s worse.
I thought he’s a hero
Clyde cannot be the protagonist because he’s wanting to kill innocent people.
Clyde had to die.
A better ending would have been if Nick just straight up shot Clyde in his cell and is convicted of his murder.
I dont blame clyde for anything he did just goes to show how screwed up our justice system really is
I absolutely blame him. The daughter and wife did nothing; my family suffered, so I’m going to traumatize yours.
The blonde girl was at worst naive and following the lead of her boss.
The other people in that SUV at the cemetery almost certainly didn’t do anything.
I get his anger, but many of the people he killed and hurt were misplaced rage.
A much worse justice system would involve innocent people being thrown in jail because its not what you can prove, its what you know. lots of problems with the system, but the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' is something to be cherished.
@@nwj03a The Nuremburg Trials show that blindly following orders is not an excuse. The blonde, the old man, and foxx cared more about conviction percentage rates than actual justice.
Does that excuse his actions? No.
What it does do is show commentary on how most current DA offices function, caring more about personal rates than the people that are swept under the rug by their actions. This is why vigilante stories like this are such hits because we all know that the system is broken to an extent, and the first conclusion we all come to is the most primitive one, to use violence to distribute justice.
This was a great movie, now for a twist. Originally, Butler was supposed to play the ADA and Foxx was going to play the other role. They realized they should switch parts, and I'm glad they did.
I went to see this movie in the theater and when the Judges head blow up my Brother busted out Laughing and some people around us got mad
😂
Same thing happened to me, only the movie was the first Final Destination movie, the scene was the girl getting killed by the bus, it was both me and my mother that busted out laughing and there was only one other person in the cinema with us and about ten seconds later he got up and left XD
wouldnt be funny if his did lmao hahahaha
You may remember Butler... as the guy who kicked a dude in the chest and into a big F-ing hole after yelling "THIS IS SPARTA"
That’s where I know him from! Haha 😂
Finally someone reacted to it. I think Gerard is one of the most underestimated actors in Hollywood! Acting genius!
I agree!
This movie is so fantastic. I only wish that more people could recognize it, I remember when it came out it wasn't well received but I saw it in the theaters and was blown away. Kinda not too crazy about the ending, but I guess they gotta have the "good guys" win at the end, even though Clyde wasn't the bad guy. Its the system thats the villain in movies like this.
Roger Ebert gave it a nice review with 3 out of 4 stars, saying it was "the kind of movie you will like more at the time than in retrospect."
No, Clyde was the bad guy.
He took bill reynplds whos on;y crime was that he was part of the prosecution amd buried him alive. Then he stabbed a prisoner in the neck for no reason. Then he blew up a prosecutor who did nothing wrong. Then he got another prosecutor murdered. And killed a judge. How is he the good guy? Why bedside the system did him wrong and only one of the people who killed them got the death penalty? You could justify him taking his revenge on the people who killed his family. But that’s it. But then he went further and decided to inflict mass terror on people who didn’t kill his family. They were just not perfect at their jobs. Sorry, but you don’t always get your way in court. It doesn’t give you the right to bury someone alive or blow someone up in a car.
He was the villain. You’re a moron for thinking he was the good guy. And he got what he deserved. He should have suffered a bit more before he went out, frankly.
@@johnr8095 Exactly right. The reason the film never became a huge hit is because it became an exercise in vigilante killing. After the first couple of murders, you are supposed to feel dirty because you want this guy to keep on killing. The problem is, too many people don't even recognize the corruption in themselves in the end.
super late comment, but the reason he stripped naked when the cops were coming was for his own safety. if he was clothed, the swat team could've shot him and claimed he was reaching for something in his pocket or his waistband for a potential weapon. but since he was naked, he couldnt have reached for anything, so they had no excuse for shooting him and had to take him alive.
I honestly didn't know that Clyde was suppose to be the bad guy until I read the back of the dvd and it gave a brief summary of what the movie was about. I always thought was a story of a tormented hero taking down slimy lawyers and broken justice system with a sad ending.
"Seven" is an oldie but goodie action/suspense thriller with Morgan Freeman & Brad Pitt - highly recommend!
You mean THE best, ever, right, not oldie-goodie.
Yes. That and also bone collector
Oh yes. That movie scared the shit out of me when I was young. It still does.
"Just cause" is another low key great crime thriller with a great cast.
Yup. It's one of my favorite movies! 😁
Fracture with Anthony Hopkins an Ryan Gosling is a good one.
fracture is awesome
Absolutely a good one.
In the Director's Cut, there's an alternate ending where Clyde actually survives, and can being seeing walking along the street in disguise.
I prefer that ending
That is the right ending for sure.. and I bet that Jamie’s character learned his lesson
@@pauldc83 Seems he learned it in this ending too.
I prefer that ending as well, or that Clyde kills everyone, including Foxx's family. Not out of hatred or malice, but out of karma. Lawyers are the epitome of manipulation of a system that is terribly flawed to begin with. Clyde killing everyone would demonstrate that you in that position (an attorney that literally deals and makes compromises in life and death decisions for a "conviction record" instead of justice) has consequences, dire and severe ones if you misuse your office. That's how it should be to be honest. That would never fly on a movie like this, but that would have been the best ending in my opinion, with everyone dying except Jamie Foxx's character. That way he'd be the tortured person that wondered "what if I'd done the right thing." Hell, it is one reason that Seven is such a great movie. The "good guy" shouldn't always win, because in real life they don't always win. Just my 2 cents. This is still a great film though.
@@Nimbus1701 Yes, totally with you. I honestly thought I was the only one who thought the ending was an absolutely awful cop out. I saw it twice at the cinema, because I didn't want to let that spoil it. I got it on blu ray and dvd, but kept getting rid of it, because I hated it so much. Now I know there's a director's cut though with a better ending, have to check it out. Hope it's true.
19:56 Didn’t think of this until now: I think another reason he waited ten years before acting upon his plan was to let Nick grow with his child, can’t expect someone to learn if they don’t understand (in this case being a family man , “You even think of touching my family?”, the irony of who Nick is talking to). Maybe that’s why Clyde doesn’t take revenge on Nick and was probably never going to, because Clyde knows best what can happen if you take family away from someone.
He had to wait 10 years cause that's how long it took for the first guy to be sentenced to death. That was the kick start of his plan that would lead to everything else.
@@Puckett. I legit always thought he waited 10 years because he was intricately planning out everything he was going to do from having to literally dig tunnels, to studying law on how to phrase everything and go around the system in order to corrupt it, etc.
@@deadsetondreams1988 maybe I'm sure it took him a long time to make his plans but his execution of his plans all started with the first guy who he had killed by painful lethal injection rather than painless. And most death row punishments take 10+ years before they get their execution date. For all we know it only took him a few years to set everything up but he just had to wait til the first guys execution date.
Micheal Douglas’ film “Falling Down” (1993?) is a pretty good film - about an every day dude who just ‘snaps’.
Even with how over the top Unhinged was, I felt it was the love child of Falling Down and Law Abiding Citizen.
I keep making a note that he needs to peep Falling Down. One day he'll listen 🤣
@@KHAOE1 yes he needs to watch falling down
The biggest problem is that the ending is really rushed. No way Clyde should have been outsmarted that fast. To much coincidence in the end. Other than that, a great movie.
The actor that plays Darby is on Chicago Fire. He plays one of my favorite characters, the complete opposite of the character he plays in this movie.
I love how Gerald butler's character is called Clyde, a very Scottish name for a Scottish actor. Olympus has fallen and 300 are the 2 other very famous movies he has been in.
This guy is the question what would happen if The Punisher and Jigsaw were the same character. He has the intelligence of Jigsaw and the skills of Frank Castle. He was ahead the whole time in this film . They had to outsmart him . People complain about movies like these but that's why I love stories like this and Saw , you have to outsmart the pattern that these villians do .
Yes, I agree 1000%. I'd have much preferred Butler's character (Clyde) kill everyone, including Foxx's family. Not out of spite or malice, but to show there should be true consequences to hold the power of office and attorney and manipulate the system for "conviction rates". I mean, hell there is a good 20 minutes near the end where they are talking about "fuck his civil rights" and "bend whatever laws you have to", etc., etc.,.... I want to say to people.... Hey folks, this guy is a VICTIM, and got no justice. The criminal in the beginning (who was the one that killed Clyde's family) manipulated the system and blamed his accomplice, and pretty much got of for nothing. I'm not an anarchist or a psychopath or anything like that, but Clyde was really the hero (or antihero) of this film and the ending should have been completely different. I'd have had Jamie Foxx's character end up being the one in perpetual suffering for not fulfilling his obligation and duty of his oath/office as an attorney.
Clyde had nothing left to lose and no reason to live beyond retribution and to teach the lawyer a life lesson. Job done!
Nice reaction....
Remember loving this movie at least 3/4 of it.... but it bothered me to no end that I felt like Jamie F. character never took any real blame for the mistakes committed.
There should be a Part 2 where You see Clyde escaping right before the bomb dedinates. Meaning Clyde was WAY SMARTER then everyone. He would have had an alternate escape plan.
Another good choice. I don't remember seeing Jamie Foxx or Gerard Butler in a role I didn't like.
I'm with everyone else. Clyde shoulda won.
His goal wasn't to get revenge on some people and then flee the country and live out his days. His goal was to get Nick to realize why what he did was wrong and to change and that's exactly what happened. So he did "win" he just didn't survive
I love this movie so much! This movie and Inside Man are amazing
Me too ..
Love inside man
Inside man is an awesome movie too. I agree with you.
Falling Down is another good movie that is very often skipped.
When I first saw Law Abiding Citizen I compared it to Falling Down, in that it was about a guy that you started off rooting for, until you realized he had turned into a mad dog that had to be put down
Man, you have got to do "Every Which Way Buy Loose" and "Any Which Way You Can". Clint Eastwood as a bare knuckle fighter. Great Comedy.
I'd love to see you react to Man On Fire starring Denzel Washington. I think you would absolutely love it!
Great movie! 😁
Very underrated movie. Gerard Butler is amazing in this.
This movie is SO underrated...
Bet- CGIs, super powers, n explosions, flicks like this today are def a treat.
Great choice C-I, once again something different f the others. Bravo!
My favorite part of this movie was when he said “that’s what wrenches are for….dumbass” gets me every time
Neat facts Gerard was supposed to originally play Nick while Jamie Fox would play Clyde however Gerard thought it would be interesting to play Clyde and asked Jamie Fox if it was okay to switch last minute Jamie loved Gerard in 300 so they switch their roles and ironically Josh Stewart starred in another movie called the collector ironically like this movie he breaks into a house and ends up having to save the family from something much worst.
The Collector was a two film series, and it’s highly underrated. Josh Stewart also was a reoccurring character in Criminal Minds as AJ’s husband.
@@robertnguyen9493 Exactly glad some one knew of that movie I only saw reviews but I knew it was underrated by just the clips alone.
@@jonathancunningham8739 I saw the first one, and I remember the trailer for the second one and reviews of it here on RUclips.
@@robertnguyen9493 True very true.
The first guy that Jimmy Fox is talking to is Roger Bart From TVs “Bull”. The blonde female was Leslie Bibb from “Talladega Nights” as Ricky Bobby’s wife who couldn’t cook, but orders fast food. And his law partner is character actor Bruce Miguel who played D-Day from “Animal House” as well as the racist and murderous Duke Purdy from “Rosewood”.
When the judge said I can practically do whatever I want, I knew she was about to get it. Plus CeeLo had a problem with a smart phone blowing up In his ear, and immediately it goes back to the law abiding citizen.
If you like Gerard Butler as a villain he plays Dracula in Dracula 2000. Not a very popular movie but I always enjoyed it and it has a very unique origin story for Dracula that I've never seen before.
He wanted to go to solitary confident
It’s so refreshing when Gerard Butler’s character gets his revenge, however he does cross the line when it’s not enough for him, and practically goes and kills everyone unnecessarily.
tbh only moment he crosses the line was when he traumatized that kid with the dvd, that was uncessary. Every other person he kills have either assisted the murderer or take part of the corrupt system. Not to mention that they were all given a chance to live if they acted decently instead of challenging him when he makes threats.
Clyde was the Joker....trying to teach Batman that sometimes...you HAVE to kill to stop evil
wrong watch the movie again. nick made a plea deal with clarence, who was guilty as sin. nick knew this but because it was mostly circumstantial evidence(which is actually more then enough to get a conviction) he decided to ensure his high conviction rate and made a plea with clarence. in reality that is illogical there would be even less evidence that rupert did it, so it would have been more logical to offer rupert a plea deal and have Clyde also testify, therebye security a conviction of clarence. but no he had to do thing s the dumbass way. clyde's entire point was that nick should have just went to trial and if clarence got off then he got off because it was the RIGHT thing to do.
clyde's entire point was that don't make deals just go for it the right way but that all went out the window when nick found out where the bomb was an then transported it(illegally mind you) to the prison and then ensured clyde's death. thats not doing the right thing and goes against what clyde was trying to teach him. the correct thing would have been for him to have the bomb disposal unit "dispose of the bomb" then catch Clyde sneaking back into the prison saying"we cought you red handed" we found your bomb and safely disposed of it. we have two options you admit to your actions and we take the death penalty of the table or 2 we go for the death penalty and you get executed" but nope nick actually commited murder by killing clyde and actually did not learn anything
@@houseofaction whoa there, cowboy. Slow your roll lol. I wasnt tryin to make a literal comparison...just drawing a thematic parallel. I didnt mean that Clyde was teaching Nick to kill. I probably shouldve worded it better.
This is a pretty good movie, makes you empathize with Gerard's character. Glad you watched this~
This was a sleeper movie of this genre, one of my favs glad to see someone react to it.
No winners ,, everyone lost.
The cellphone scene gets everybody!!! Haha its ok man!
Clyde learned from the Joker in The Dark Knight, wink
Von Clausowitz was a Prussian general
from like 1600 who wrote a book on how to plan and win a war. Basically, a Prussian version of "The art of war". He is still taught at the US Army War College.
It's crazy that the guy that plays Darby in this movie is one of the most lovable characters on Chicago Fire.
I think this is the first reaction someone has done to this movie. Why aren't there more?
Haven't seen this in a while. Riveting. I was totally rapt. I found myself absorbed, with my hand on my face, not being able to look away. I looked at you, and you were there with your hand on your face, intensely watching. Wow. I gotta go and listen to some upbeat music or something! :)
Fantastic film. I do wish it could have ended better like Foxx would see his wrong doings before killing Butler and maybe just turn his head to let him go understanding that the justice system is messed up!!!! I did hear Jamie wouldnt do the movie unless his character survived at the end and Butlers died so that kind of sucked too!!!
Fox is a bi…
You are right. This movie is underrated. Another good reaction. Very entertaining. Well done.
Thanks!
Great movie. You also see other Gerard Butler great movies like Gamer and Olympus Has Fallen
Leonidas from 300
The man did what any good father and husband would do in that situation.
"You can't fight faith!"
Butler came a long way since supporting in Reign Of Fire!
Glad someone reacted to this, one of his best. I remember watching this in cinema. A man bawled, "JAH!" after the cellphone scene.
That period was a good time for movies. Another was Fracture (Ryan Gosling), Drive (also Gosling) and Edge Of Darkness (Mel Gibson).
excellent recommends:
Fracture (anthony hopkins): best court movie of all time, absolutely brilliant, even better than Clyde in this movie, lol
Drive (ryan gosling): absolutely epic movie, truly amazing, makes the "Baby Driver" movie, look like a baby, laughs, highly highly highly recommend, if haven't seen it
Edge of Darkness (Mel Gibson): great justice/vigilantism/vengeance movie
@Shaun Keener can't be funnier than Dead And Loving It!
@Shaun Keener everybody had to start somewhere. Even Kurt Russell was a child actor on Gilligan's Island.
The line is “you can’t fight FATE” not faith. This has sweet F A to do with faith. 🤦🏻♂️
First thing I saw him in was Dracula 2000
The hand on the face after the judge got killed lmao
Best. Daddy. Ever. When he just stared at the bracelet with the flames creeping up behind him, he wasn't even scared probably was ready to see his daughter again.
This is one of the movies where I wanted the 'antagonist' to win. Clyde was definitely entertaining. Great reaction 👍
His goal wasn't to get revenge on some people and then flee the country and live out his days. His goal was to get Nick to realize why what he did was wrong and to change and that's exactly what happened. So he did "win" he just didn't survive
@@Jdubayou how do we know Nick changed? They didnt take him seriously at all, which means they thought they could control the situation. So you’re wrong but ok 👍
@@cptayne Nick literally says “I don’t make deals with murderers anymore” which is what the whole thing was about
@@Jdubayou I think he was just mocking him, underlying that he knew Clyde was killing people
So you need to see Ricochet 1991 Denzel, Ice-T and John Lithgow if you like this, you need to watch that.
*Iced Tea
@@foreignmilk5589 what do you have any idea who that is and what he did for the rap industry.
"why did he get naked". I think so the cops couldn't say that he had any weapons on him, thus killing him during the arrest.
The fact that the system really is protecting the criminals sometimes... And the fact that a parent could be pushed to this, the movie is amazing
Love the freeze frames as you transition your commentary through the movie and story telling... another great reaction. I only found your channel last week and I've been binge watching since 👍
I love Jamie Foxx he's a underrated singer actor and comedian but...I was rooting against him in this I'm on Team Clyde all the way.
Stop it! He wasn't no criminal mastermind. He was a man depending on justice, But got Jamie as a ADA who only was concerned with winning.
Didn't consult Butler before making a deal, didn't tell him that he took the deal with Ames. He was a law abiding citizen taking to a point of no return. And he didn't care if he lived or died.
This movie is criminally underrated!
He’s like the Joker, Batman, Punisher all in one
"How doesn't anyone know what he looks like," it's called hiding in plain sight. 🤔 Herard Butler 300, Den of Theives, Reign of Fire,and if course the Olympus, London, and Angel has Fallen movies.
Den of thieves is underrated
@@williamswiniuch7527 it sure is, Oshay Jackson Jr did his thang in this, then he did a comedy with Charlize Theron
Hey man, this was the first reaction of yours that i watched, just gotta say that i like your insights and i will be checking out your other stuff. Keep it up dude.
From the Director of “Friday” and “Straight Outta Compton”.
this is one of the most underrated movies ever. And what is funny originally Clyde was suppose to be played by Jamie Foxx. But before he signed on he asked if he could take the role of the DA and asked Gerald if he would play Clyde. No other changes, just switch those roles. Gerald Butler said ok, and they were off to the races.
"Its going to be biblical." that is the coldest line ever IMO.
Not sure if u noticed but this movie was set in Philadelphia. I know cause I'm a Philly native. Our Mayor even did a cameo. He was the Bible holder when Foxx was sworn in as acting D.A.
I think they mentioned Philly in the film though
Honestly.... I was KINDA hoping the GB’s character would’ve been successful and taken down the American government to wage revolution.🤷🏻♂️
Reading about the crazy way this movie came together, makes sense why you end up pulling for the character.
Lmao it’s gonna take a lot more than one guy to take down the whole government
@@kevinprzy4539 it’s a movie man.🤷🏻♂️at least to have been successful taking the city down.
I've seen this in the theater years ago and I have it on DVD and it was decent
I didn't remember that Leslie Bibb was in this.
Just found you. Just watched this vidoe.
All I have to say... is you nailed it. It's a dark movie... with... some very dark aspects of OUR justice system. Well done sir. Keep up the good work.
This movie is underrated for sure slept on. I think jaime fox’s character should have died tho because he was part of the system that failed him. He tells Jaime fox’s character he would have been okay with the out come if they went to trial at least they tried. The assassination of the judge was pure savagery
He ruthless and I love it 💯🔥
Someone in comments mentioned RICOCHET (1991) WITH DENZEL WASHINGTON I forgot about that movie it's even better than this one in my opinion.
What he does to that man is what I'd do if ANYONE touched my kids!!
No you wouldn't. Don't overestimate yourself.
I believe you…… any decent mother would do anything to protect or avenge her children
A very underrated film.
YEAH, that was the bomb the way Darby screwed with the Judge.
One of my favorites. Both leading actors are fantastic. Would like to see them do something else together. I thought they had a great dynamic.
I remember seeing this at a movie theater, and was blown away.
This movie is absolutely why Intelligence is way scarier than raw power.
I love how they keep saying the term "screw his civil rights" in a movie called "Law Abiding Citizen."
the ending of this movie makes no sense, clyde is specifically stated to be a super genius who is so good at what he does, that if he wants you dead YOU WILL BE. the ending should have been similar, where Nick Rice thinks he outsmarted him and and after Nick locks the door on him clyde looks and says to him" you think you outsmarted me" that bomb their(looks down at the bomb" isn't the real bomb" then you here a big explosion in the distance
The ending was changed. Think it was Jamie who didn't want Clyde to win. Too much of a downer ending. So yeah, Clyde lost. But, at the very least, the lesson seems to have sunk in.
you are totally missing the point here, clyde wanted nick to bend the rules to bring justice. so when he did he was able to catch clyde, clyde did win in the long run by changing nicks character as a whole he won't be following the rules too the tea anymore.
you are wrong, 100% wrong, clarence was the guilty party, everyone involved knew this but to secure a conviction nick made a deal with clarence so he would rat out his accomplice who was only guilty of Breaking and entering. clyde specifically said that nick should have not made the deal, if he would have not made the deal and clarence got away with the murders then so be it, atleast nick would have stuck by his morals. in the end of the movie nick did not learn a damn thing. he didn't do the right thing. so he finds the bomb right? the correct thing would have been to have the bomb disposal unit to douse it in liquid nitrogen and detonate it in a safe manner, in stead nick took the bomb back to the prison put it in clyde's cell and then let him blow himself up, that is by definition going against what clyde wanted(to do the right thing) the right thing would have been for nick to save the day and prevent anymore deaths, including clyde's, clyde could then spend the rest of his life in prison. you simply didn't pay attention.
because nick said to clyde"there wasn't enough evidence, if we took him to court we could have lost" and then clyde said"yes and if you would have done that and you lost the case, atleast we could hold our heads high knowing you tried" but you made a deal with the devil to protect your precious conviction rate" or something along those lines. then he told him he was going to burn the whole dam corrupt temple to the ground. by definition Nick killing(legally he commited murder by putting that bomb in cell, lawyers have reviewed this movie and concluded that nick committed several felonies)
not to mention Nick is actually a shitty lawyer he claimed there was only circumstantial evidence but most cases are won on circumstantial evidence entirely a testimony from clyde and Rupert would have been enough to convict Clarence, it would be one thing that if rupert said" clarence did it" but with clyde's testimony as well and the fact there was evidence clarence was there, he would have been as good as dead. the fact is that clyde wanted nick to learn to actually fallow the letter of the law. and actually make a true attempt at a win. IE nick didn't learn anything
@@houseofaction im not wrong but you are able to have a opinion
There's not a man on Earth that could stop me from getting my vengeance if something like this ever happened to my family either. I don't think I would have taken it as far as he did though 🤣
Great reaction cuz!!! I wish u used slow motion when u got scared, when the judge got a phone call lol
My uncle did the lighting for this movie. He said it was a really tough movie to do. I love it but he never enjoys talking about his time doing this one! He told me that Gerard Butler and Jaime Foxx are two of the nicest people you could ever want to work with
Such an awesome movie, haha
*It's nice when the system works*
That is what Derek Chavin would said if he was found not guilty.
Funny Fact: Before Jaime Foxx came on board, Gerard was planned to play Jaime's character Nick.
Clyde should've just bailed after planting the bomb at city hall instead of returning back to prison..
Your video is really well made. Great job, you deserve more than 73 k views.
Target and Walmart sold a double feature Blu Ray disc with Law Abiding Citizen and the Thomas Jane Punisher film for 9 bucks, I bought at least 10 copies as gifts for freinds and family :)
People seem to tiptoe around saying it but jamie foxx character was a dirty cop, clyde was trying to fix a broken justice system and the dirty cop killed him for it
Everyone fighting for the state and status quo in this is the bad guy