SampleTron 2 VS MELLOTRON V (Sample Sound Comparison)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 янв 2025

Комментарии • 57

  • @beckoning-chasm
    @beckoning-chasm 2 года назад +10

    Thanks for this, very educational. I already own the Arturia one, and based on this I kind of like it more than the IK Multimedia one. It sounds a bit more lo-fi. All I'm looking for is that Crimson/Moody Blues/Genesis vibe, because honestly, all this is chasing nostalgia. Great video!

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад +1

      Thank you so much !!
      I also love progressive rock in general such as Genesis and King Crimson !!

  • @redalcatel27
    @redalcatel27 Год назад +3

    Thanks for the video! It's hard to decide.... The sampletron sounds like a more saturated raw sound which gives it a more vintage sound. The arturia has a much cleaner sound with better quality. I can see uses for both, so it wouldn't hurt to have both. Have you tried Wavesfactory Newmello and UVI Mello?

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад +1

      Thank you for watching !!
      Certainly, I also feel that Sampletron is a saturated sound.
      I don't have "Wavesfactory NewMello".
      I forgot that I had "UVI Mello" ...
      I played it for the first time in a long time.
      It's simple, but I think it has a good tone.
      It is good to be able to customize stereo and tuning easily.

  • @howardanderson3061
    @howardanderson3061 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for another great video! SampleTron 2 currently on sale makes it a good deal

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад

      Thank you so much !!

  • @lundsweden
    @lundsweden Год назад +2

    Such lovely, nostalgic tones from both plugs. I'm leaning towards the Arturia sound wise though.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад +2

      Thank you for watching.
      Arturia sounds like a natural sound.
      IK has a little effect processing, and it is an impression that it can be used immediately in the band sound.

    • @lundsweden
      @lundsweden Год назад +4

      @@ita-shin I agree the IK sounds more finished, more modern. But I guess I like that old sound more. I'll probably end up buying both!

  • @leonardogoncalves1099
    @leonardogoncalves1099 2 года назад +8

    in my opinion the sampletron is more saturated and textured. you can feel a more analog and vintage tone with it.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад +1

      I feel so too.
      There is a sense of saturation, and the sound has power.

    • @theoneandonly6533
      @theoneandonly6533 11 месяцев назад

      way warmer sound more lows@@ita-shin

  • @faithalityblog
    @faithalityblog 3 года назад +8

    SampleTron all the way.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  3 года назад +1

      I have been using it since the first SampleTron was released.

  • @realmusic4you
    @realmusic4you Год назад +1

    It is a shame that they refuse to give us loyal supporters Sample Moog 2 and Sonik Synth 2 My 2 favorite synths.

  • @otisrichardson881
    @otisrichardson881 3 года назад

    IK Multimedia been in the effects and saturation game a lot longer than Arturia. What we are hearing is a difference in harmonic overtones due to saturation. The same can be done in Mellotron V using the effects section.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  3 года назад +2

      I agree.
      This comparison is the simplest comparison of sample sound.
      Adjusting all effects parameters, both will be good sound.

  • @murdockscott
    @murdockscott 2 года назад

    Thanks for the comparison, very interesting. I have owned M-Tron Pro for many years and love it to death. I recently acquired the Arturia emulation when I upgraded my collection. I am a bit surprised at the high price tag of Sampletron 2, when did IK media software get so expensive? Personally, I would agree that Sampletron 2 might sound more authentic, but I have that well covered with M-Tron Pro and if I need a quick tron sound that works effortlessly in a mix, I think I will be reaching for the Arturia plug in and adding my own effects. As much as the complete package of Sampletron 2 is appealing, I can’t see it being worth it for me personally.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад +1

      Thank you for watching !!
      I don't have M-Tron Pro, so I would like to use it if I have the opportunity.
      I have been using Sampletron since the first generation, but Sampletron 2 has recorded a huge number of samples.
      It's a factor that makes it expensive.
      It's best to buy it at the time of the discount sale.
      In this video, we are comparing with the initialized dry sound.
      I think the recorded presets have a different feel.
      I feel that both have their own good points.
      Twenty to thirty years ago, I loaded a Mellotron sample into an AKAI sampler and used it for live performances and recordings.
      By comparison, all current products are great !!

    • @murdockscott
      @murdockscott 2 года назад +1

      @@ita-shin I guess the price is reasonable considering the amount of content. I own several of the expansions for the M-Tron Pro and that makes it equally costly. In fact, the M-Tron complete package they offer is pretty much identical in price. Part of my surprise is that in the past IK media had more of a rep as a budget solution for sounds. I have owned their products in the past but never found much use for them. I also remember the quest for great sampled Tron sounds back in the day! My first sampler was a little Akai S612! If I had found a nice tron choir to sample, it would not have been very long and I would have had to load it from stinkin quick disks! I spent a LOT of time over the years sampling various romplers or converting sample libraries trying to get a collection of Mellotron sounds. So, I agree, the options we have today are amazing, and any of these products are honestly kinda fantastic and well worth the money if you remember how much stuff USED to cost and how much effort we put into it! 😉

  • @mattbrown-mb
    @mattbrown-mb Год назад

    No M-Tron Pro?

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад

      I just don't have an M-Tron Pro.
      I would like to try it if I have the chance.

  • @frattuncbas
    @frattuncbas Месяц назад

    1:05 Level 42-Lesson intro

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Месяц назад

      "Level 42-Lesson"?
      Sorry, I've never heard of it...

    • @frattuncbas
      @frattuncbas Месяц назад +1

      @ ruclips.net/video/9x1RcVrGjGM/видео.htmlsi=AjhBoGUg139x_Xmk
      Layered with guitar.

  • @MickaLuna
    @MickaLuna 3 года назад +1

    Great comparison! Have you compared any of these with M-Tron Pro? That would be the definitive comparison :)

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  3 года назад

      Thank you so much !!
      Unfortunately, I don't have M-Tron Pro.
      I also want to try it !

  • @DeepHipilossa
    @DeepHipilossa 2 года назад +7

    ARTURIA by the mile imo... Mellotron (the real tape sampler instrument) has a generally dark tone that responds to the quality and wearness of the tape rolls themselves. The "shiny" tone on the SampleTron, not only sounds now (more than 50 years later) like a digital toy and nothing like a Mellotron, but even in the sixties was the Mellotron dark. And THAT was its charm... It's easy: try to replicate the Strawberry Fields intro (perhaps the most famous example where we only hear Mellotron until the singer/band follows) with the SampleTron. Then with the Mellotron V. You can get almost exactly there with Arturia's, and not even close in tone with IK's... I have and love lots of IK products (from digital amps to mixing/mastering software), but their synths... Always the same mistake. Well sampled, but overly "brighted", lots of EQ and exciter there.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад +2

      Thank you for watching !!
      I also have a lot of IK software instruments and effects.
      Certainly, I think SampleTron has a bright sound to match modern music tracks.
      The recorded sample also gives a clear and bright impression.
      When listened to alone, I think the Mellotron V is closer to the real Mellotron.
      I sometimes apply saturation effects to synthesizers that are too clear.
      It often fits in with other sounds.

  • @CesarMalacon
    @CesarMalacon Год назад

    wow. first sound the Sampletron is way bigger than Arturia's

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад +1

      I agree.
      The Sampletron seems to have a wider range and sound pressure.
      Feel the effect processing.
      Arturia's feels more natural.

    • @kevinnute1701
      @kevinnute1701 Год назад

      @@ita-shinWere the levels matched? The Sampletron sample sounds to my ears like the Arturia sample was passed through a trashy sounding EQ with lots of IM distortion, boosted at the most obnoxious frequencies and the comparison was EQ on/off.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад

      @@kevinnute1701 Arturia's sample is a natural impression.
      I feel that Sampletron is corrected in various ways in EQ etc.
      Perhaps Sampletron contains flashy samples so that sounds can be heard in the band sound.

    • @kevinnute1701
      @kevinnute1701 Год назад

      @@ita-shin I wasn't suggesting that you had applied EQ; sorry if I gave that impression I was referring to the Sampletron preset designer's choices. Agreed that their, to my ears overly aggressive take on the violin sound might cut through a dense mix better but I feel like the character of the original instrument has been obscured. I prefer the Arturia default; I can dirty it
      up later, with superior effects, if the song , mix and taste require it...

  • @shinokto3972
    @shinokto3972 4 месяца назад

    sampletron for me

  • @moontan91
    @moontan91 9 месяцев назад +1

    Mike Pinder Mellotron samples CD

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  9 месяцев назад +1

      It's a CD-ROM about 20 years ago, right?
      I had it.
      I read it into AKAI samplers and hardware synths and used it for live and recording.
      Maybe I still have it somewhere.

    • @moontan91
      @moontan91 9 месяцев назад

      @@ita-shin yeah, CD-ROM.
      you probably already know this, but he played keys with the Moody Blues and worked for the company who built Mellotrons.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  9 месяцев назад +1

      @@moontan91 Of course I know !!
      He passed away recently...

    • @moontan91
      @moontan91 9 месяцев назад

      @@ita-shin that i did not know.
      may he RIP.

  • @amaninaroom8678
    @amaninaroom8678 8 дней назад

    You had to even the attack and release.......

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  8 дней назад

      The parameters for both plugins are the same.
      The difference in pronunciation is due to the differences in the samples included with each product.

  • @alexandersorbas1881
    @alexandersorbas1881 3 года назад

    arturia

  • @tilersun
    @tilersun 2 года назад

    IK might aPPeal to new producers because it''s sharper and saturated but the sound quality of the Arturia is far superiour.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  2 года назад

      Certainly, IK sounds more saturated and flashy.

  • @tokusenohashi
    @tokusenohashi Год назад

    超迷うな。

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад

      迷った時は両方を!

    • @tokusenohashi
      @tokusenohashi Год назад

      @@ita-shin それは贅沢ですねw たぶん、IKにします。動画にしていただいて助かりました。

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад

      @@tokusenohashi ご覧いただき、ありがとうございます!
      少しでも参考になった様でしたら嬉しいです!

  • @ronkramer3476
    @ronkramer3476 Год назад

    Arturia is better sounding.

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  Год назад +1

      I feel that "IK" has more effect processing applied to the sample itself.
      “Arturia” might be more natural.
      I think that the ease of use when layered with other instruments depends on the timbre.

    • @amaninaroom8678
      @amaninaroom8678 8 дней назад

      ​@@ita-shin i think its vice versa. the arturia sounds better but at the same time more dull... what i expect is cause of more effects processing.
      but, in the end i have to check boot against theyr hardware

    • @ita-shin
      @ita-shin  8 дней назад

      @@amaninaroom8678 What is compared here is the comparison of the recorded sample with the effect turned off.
      And I don't say that one is good.
      The impression that the sample of "ARTURIA" is more naturally recorded, and "IK" is an impression that the sound is being made in effects during the sampling process.
      I think that "IK" often demonstrates its presence in the song.
      That's because a sample is made with such a sound.
      In this video, both effects are turned off and verified.
      I think that if you apply effects and do the right edit to the sound, both will be a strong sound.