frames per second is a huge advantage in racing. at 60 fps at 150 mph you travel 36 feet between each frame shown...the faster the frames, the more real time you can see braking zones, etc...its a big deal
27“ at 1080p is still kind of okay, but for around 50$ more per monitor you can already get 32“ 1440p ones with over 120hz - that’s the route I will go 🙂 thx for the vid!
I just picked up Acer’s Nitro XV2 27 inch, 1440P, up to 180hz, 1ms response time, with AMD free sync. 3 were $747 shipped direct from Acer. Waiting on the sim rig still, but from using the one I setup it is also another great option, for not a whole lot more than the Pixio
1440/4k triples is still hard to push...1080p at 32" is still fine, I have a 6950xt...its no slouch but triple 1440p is still a pain if you want eyecandy also
Also looking at a triple screen setup with 27" 1080p screens. While a 1440p screen is not that much more expensive, running them requires a very beefy GPU, so I think it's a great value solution running triple 1080p
For anyone looking to buy these: Spend a 100$ more per monitor and get something proper, which can both be 27" or 32" at a proper 1440p resolution. The difference between 165hz and 120hz is not noticable for most people anyways (I personally notice a difference until 80hz, after that I am good) and his own video about buying 60hz monitors for simracing was just as questionable anyways. And more important than the refresh rate is the synchronization at this point anyways, which is not existend here. And no! Freesynch does not cost the manufacturer extra to implement, only Gsynch does. And one of these 2 techs should be included to reduce screen tearing, which is way more important for simracing. Also all over 24" you would want to go with 1440p anyways, as 1080p can be distracting for people at that size and since simracing titles are more CPU than GPU bound, you also hardly will have GPU problems because of the higher resolution with proper screens. The "1ms response time" is standard nowadays and therefore a pointless argument. Even VA panels go with 1ms nowadays. In the end, I cannot tell you what to buy, but I can advice to stay away from something like this which is done with less than basic knowledge about what was advertised in this video.
Running triple Philips Momentum with 1080p 27" 165hz and tbh that is totally fine. I think 27" is a lot more useable for most people as A: they are much more manageable in form factor compared to triple 32". Also with 32" you will HAVE to go with 1440p meaning the strain on your gpu will be very high. Now I personally need my high fps but I do very much care about graphics quality as well. I run an RTX 3080 that I overclocked slightly and my GPU does 180fps in triple 1080p Assetto Corsa on the Nordschleife with Pure and CustomShadersPatch 0.2.3 (preview build) all on the high and sometimes highest settings so I am fine. BUT if I was to use 1440p screens my GPU wouldnt be able to keep up and a 3080 I would say is a pretty strong gpu. 1440p might be nice, but when you are actually racing 1080p is absolutely fine and enjoyable
I caught some AsRock PG 27ff1a monitors on sale last year for my setup. 1080p @ 165hz, IPS with Freesync and HDR-10 for only $150 each? Oh hell yeah! Coming from a 75hz VA 1080p panel, the 165hz is incredibly smooth. I can't go back to less than 144hz, even if the game can't run at a steady 165hz. 😂
@@s3nTerIt's enough of a leap in smoothness to make a difference, at least from 60FPS to around 170FPS in my eyes. Can't feel much of a difference between 170 and 240, and I ended up settling on 120 as my norm for consistency since some games just do not run well at high framerates. Even games like chess feel better at higher refresh rates, I hope more devs optimize for that in the future.
there really won't be that much of a difference. whatever you can get the better deal on. i would get as much screen size and refresh rate as you can within your budget.
5:47 'you dont need an extremely powerful pc, o yea btw i have the upgraded version of the last gen flagship gpu in my system and its pushing 165hz no sweat' 😂
Honestly, this should be the base.... but it is also a much higher level, which requires much more, in terms of PC power. Starting at 1080p is not shameful, especially in these times, where GPU manufacturers seem to push people to forget that there is something after 1080p... so much so that the products become expensive
i dont think refresh rate has a big impact on refresh rate either, and im the living proof of it, i got some pretty fast lap times on some of my videos in Assetto corsa (not bragging, just tryna put the truth out there that u dont need big refresh rates) i mostly use 60hz for monitors and 72hz for v.r and im talking like top 10s type of lap times on rsr, sometimes even world record when i had a shit p.c i even used 30fps for sim racing, it was tough the faster cars like f1 cars but still doable, but for v.r you want 72hz MINIMUM for every situation or you might get sick
hi oc racing i asked whether you could do a moza r3 review 3 months ago still waiting for that video if ur not doing the moza r3 review pls reply to my comment thanks ^_^
frames per second is a huge advantage in racing. at 60 fps at 150 mph you travel 36 feet between each frame shown...the faster the frames, the more real time you can see braking zones, etc...its a big deal
27“ at 1080p is still kind of okay, but for around 50$ more per monitor you can already get 32“ 1440p ones with over 120hz - that’s the route I will go 🙂 thx for the vid!
Yep. LG.
link?
@@endfm no links allowed in RUclips comments (for most users)
Name of monitors ?
What's model are you talking about?
I think your videos are awesome, discovered you yesterday watched about 25 videos so far. Great content thanks :)
Haha, thanks a ton :)
I just picked up Acer’s Nitro XV2 27 inch, 1440P, up to 180hz, 1ms response time, with AMD free sync. 3 were $747 shipped direct from Acer. Waiting on the sim rig still, but from using the one I setup it is also another great option, for not a whole lot more than the Pixio
That does sound great! Will take a look 👍
@@OCRacing your iracing videos are honestly what got me to order a full blown setup 😂
In 2024 1440p and 4k should be the standard I hope they start making monitors a lot more affordable at high refresh rates
1440/4k triples is still hard to push...1080p at 32" is still fine, I have a 6950xt...its no slouch but triple 1440p is still a pain if you want eyecandy also
you can find 1440p 240hz for $200-250
Also looking at a triple screen setup with 27" 1080p screens. While a 1440p screen is not that much more expensive, running them requires a very beefy GPU, so I think it's a great value solution running triple 1080p
is good enough a 3060 as gpu for a triple with 2k resolution?
Claim your early ticket here
Earlier than me 😳
You are a very cringe 8 your old for ur this comment and ur pfp and name
No
@@OCRacing howwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 😱😱😱😱😱
Am I too late to claim my ticket?
For anyone looking to buy these:
Spend a 100$ more per monitor and get something proper, which can both be 27" or 32" at a proper 1440p resolution. The difference between 165hz and 120hz is not noticable for most people anyways (I personally notice a difference until 80hz, after that I am good) and his own video about buying 60hz monitors for simracing was just as questionable anyways.
And more important than the refresh rate is the synchronization at this point anyways, which is not existend here. And no! Freesynch does not cost the manufacturer extra to implement, only Gsynch does. And one of these 2 techs should be included to reduce screen tearing, which is way more important for simracing.
Also all over 24" you would want to go with 1440p anyways, as 1080p can be distracting for people at that size and since simracing titles are more CPU than GPU bound, you also hardly will have GPU problems because of the higher resolution with proper screens. The "1ms response time" is standard nowadays and therefore a pointless argument. Even VA panels go with 1ms nowadays. In the end, I cannot tell you what to buy, but I can advice to stay away from something like this which is done with less than basic knowledge about what was advertised in this video.
I got triple 32" 1440p 165hz acer screens for 150 each on ebay directly from acer's ebay store... work like a charm
Really? I'm not seeing any for 150
@@josephbornman8462 they went up to 169
What gpu are you using and how many frames per second are you getting?
@@drewwatson6980 3090 with a ryzen 9. Gives me between 70 and 120 depending on the game, on max
I was going to say great value until I saw 1080p
Running triple Philips Momentum with 1080p 27" 165hz and tbh that is totally fine. I think 27" is a lot more useable for most people as A: they are much more manageable in form factor compared to triple 32". Also with 32" you will HAVE to go with 1440p meaning the strain on your gpu will be very high. Now I personally need my high fps but I do very much care about graphics quality as well. I run an RTX 3080 that I overclocked slightly and my GPU does 180fps in triple 1080p Assetto Corsa on the Nordschleife with Pure and CustomShadersPatch 0.2.3 (preview build) all on the high and sometimes highest settings so I am fine. BUT if I was to use 1440p screens my GPU wouldnt be able to keep up and a 3080 I would say is a pretty strong gpu. 1440p might be nice, but when you are actually racing 1080p is absolutely fine and enjoyable
I caught some AsRock PG 27ff1a monitors on sale last year for my setup. 1080p @ 165hz, IPS with Freesync and HDR-10 for only $150 each? Oh hell yeah!
Coming from a 75hz VA 1080p panel, the 165hz is incredibly smooth. I can't go back to less than 144hz, even if the game can't run at a steady 165hz. 😂
What do you think about the new WRC game?
Walmart has the LG Ultra Gear, 32 inch 1440p 165hz gaming monitor for only $170 right now
Great monitor but still gonna stay with the 32". The bigger the better, Thanks for the review OC
But 40$ more per monitor will get you a 27” 1440 240hz monitor
You ain't playing cs or valorant with it where someone can peek you and shoot you dead. In racing everything happens in kinda predictable manner 😅
@@s3nTer still, easier to react to unpredictable behavior by other drivers, or mistakes, it’s also just smother, so it feels easier
@@s3nTerIt's enough of a leap in smoothness to make a difference, at least from 60FPS to around 170FPS in my eyes. Can't feel much of a difference between 170 and 240, and I ended up settling on 120 as my norm for consistency since some games just do not run well at high framerates.
Even games like chess feel better at higher refresh rates, I hope more devs optimize for that in the future.
i would like more res rather than hz, can u make a vid? or at least recommend
Oc you need to try 3 48in wide screens. Good vid oc!
Thanks for this! Been in the market
Hope it was helpful 🤝
I bought three monitors msi g2712 for $526 is it a good deal
brand new
I bought 3x 165hz 1080p IPS screens for $240 ($80 each) at microcenter today
Dang bro, what brand?
@@Kelvin-w6s they are Westinghouse. Still kicking like day 1 and surprisingly good screens. Was a total steal
@@dookehd yeah for real dude , what size are they?
@@Kelvin-w6s 27"
27" are great if u get them right in the front of wheel base :) I even have them upside-down
Are curved or flat monitors better
The difference wasn’t as big as I thought, so really it’s indifferent imo
there really won't be that much of a difference. whatever you can get the better deal on. i would get as much screen size and refresh rate as you can within your budget.
sadly only shipping for the USA lads
did you measure the response time? its not 1ms... ;D
tbh not bad, pretty good options as I use a single monitor aka my tv but I could definitely think about it
Another upload!!!!! ❤
More to come 🤝
1080p. Pass.
Costco just had a sale on an MSI 27" IPS 1440p 170hz g-sync for $180. Even regular price it's $220.
5:47 'you dont need an extremely powerful pc, o yea btw i have the upgraded version of the last gen flagship gpu in my system and its pushing 165hz no sweat' 😂
Got 3 acer 32in 1440p 165hz 1ms for $179 each
Honestly, this should be the base.... but it is also a much higher level, which requires much more, in terms of PC power.
Starting at 1080p is not shameful, especially in these times, where GPU manufacturers seem to push people to forget that there is something after 1080p... so much so that the products become expensive
What gpu are you using and how many fps do you get on medium/high settings? I’ve got a 6800xt and am nervous about running a triple monitor setup
@@drewwatson6980 3080ti with everything set to ultra around 90fps
Looks great to me 😊
no pxn v12 review this year?
The year just started 😭
Day 4 of asking for pxn V12dds review
1080p 27 inch looks awful tbh. $200 is way too much for a 1080p "low" refresh rate display in 2024.
I think the msi G2712 would be better for a cheaper price of €150.
where tf u getting that for €150?
exactly 100.000 subscriber...did i win something now? :D
i dont think refresh rate has a big impact on refresh rate either, and im the living proof of it,
i got some pretty fast lap times on some of my videos in Assetto corsa (not bragging, just tryna put the truth out there that u dont need big refresh rates)
i mostly use 60hz for monitors and 72hz for v.r and im talking like top 10s type of lap times on rsr, sometimes even world record
when i had a shit p.c i even used 30fps for sim racing, it was tough the faster cars like f1 cars but still doable, but for v.r you want 72hz MINIMUM for every situation or you might get sick
goat
Cristiano Ronaldo 🤝 Me
hi oc racing i asked whether you could do a moza r3 review 3 months ago still waiting for that video if ur not doing the moza r3 review pls reply to my comment thanks ^_^
Here before 100views!
Legend 🫡
just so yk there is no such thing as the “ultimate sim setup” without the active pedals… i hope you understand your assignment
where do you even store all your gear 😭
You should see my basement 😭
No freesync is an instant no.
1440p 165hz 27" $170....
22 second
22nd?
Yeah that’s right
Oops
What the F is that music?