Do get great deals on gear go to KEH.com Get 5% more for your gear! Sell to our sponsor KEH: SDP.io/SELL code NORTHRUP-SELL Get the best prices with a warranty at SDP.io/BUY + 5% coupon NORTHRUP-1 Cameras: Older DSLR cameras have less tech but more savings: SDP.io/kehdslr Full-frame DSLR fro more background blur and better low-light: SDP.io/ffdslr Mirrorless cameras for newest tech: SDP.io/kehmirrorless Lenses: general lenses: SDP.io/kehlenses A 50mm prime for affordable, fast, and sharp: SDP.io/keh50mm a 24-70 that does everything: SDP.io/keh2470 A 70-200 for a classiv look: SDP.io/70200 An 85 for a unique look and bokeh galore: SDP.io/keh85 Lighting: Flashes for budget lighting: SDP.io/kehflash flash with TTL, more money but easier to use: SDP.io/kehttl Strobes for more light options: SDP.io/kehstrobe
Been watching you guys since I was in highschool and now fast forward, I have my own studio. Time flies and your content and humor always keeps up, Proud and thankful for you both
I've spent my photography life trading "up" to bigger and better gear. Now I find myself trading "down" to smaller and lighter gear. Bigger isn't always better.
@@da009999 I have 2 A7R5 cameras with a 24-70mm GM II and a 70-200mm GM II; an A7CII with a 20mm G, 50mm GM, and 85mm 1.8; and an a6600 with a 24mm G 2.8 and a 50mm G 2.5. Of course, any of the lenses can be used with any of the bodies. The a6600 with the tiny lenses are really fun to use.
Huge fan of the reflector/defuser in portraiture. Great tips for beginner photographers who shouldn't and don't need to spend a lot of money to get started.
So much "cheap" stuff has lasted me for years. Probably used a nifty fifty for 6 years before upgrading. My only critique of buying an older DSLR now is that if you upgrade later, you need to rebuy lenses too, but some things like especially long lenses for wildlife or sports lenses, DSLR will be much cheaper. 1.8 lenses instead of 1.4 can be much cheaper. Third party lenses will often be cheaper with similar quality and you might loses some performance like AF speed or total sharpness, but with primes even the third party options will be generally sharp. I also usually buy a top end camera but get one model behind and/or used when new camera comes out because lots of people are interested in selling to upgrade.
The first portrait of Chelsea on the 5D mark II is so beautiful! It's so funny how the editing gives it away as a late 2000's portrait. 5D mark II can make modern looking portraits too just so the people know. ❤
This is great info. Most videos are about gear but this is a well rounded video. Really appreciate the end when you talk about interaction with the clients. Thank you so much for this.
Love this. A nice will rounded video. I find most RUclipsrs who give portrait advice are always hung up on the latest and greatest of everything. I've always thought, how the hell did they get to afford all the latest full frame cameras and lenses... And most are just like any one of us, that they started out possibly with an apsc or an entry level full frame and grew from there. I love how they're able to still give advice for the beginner/ amateur.
In most systems the 50 1.8 is practically a steal especailly for Canon R where I've seen it as low as $250 or less on sale. Nikon's is a bit more but still a good value for the money (or you can get the older F-mount version for about $220 vs the $629 for the Z version). But my point is if you want portraits on a budget, you really can't go wrong with a 50 1.8. If you're really on a budget and cannot afford even a cheap softbox, get a stand with a clamp and you can also use a reflector/diffuser disc as shown earlier in the video, as your "soft box". It's not quite the same, but still should give you nice results (better than what you'd probably get with bare flash, even off-camera. In fact, you're probably going to get a reflector anyway so if you're on a budget, you could start with that and then work up to a softbox when you need to (plus reflectors are cheap so if you destroy them, not a big deal usually -- but softboxes can be expensive, as well as a good quality stand).
You guys have really improved since your first videos. Has it been ten years already? You’re so relaxed and even more dynamic now. Sorry Tony you’ve still got that mannequin look when Chelsea is on but wow your photography has truly excelled. Both of you actually. It’s been a pleasure and a joy watching you grow. You’ve always been my favorite go to hear heads. Thank you for your guidance over the years.
Always feel refreshed seeing these and has helped me to break out of my comfort zones. From prime lenses to vintage glass, telephoto vintage, and finding so much more control in manual focus as opposed to autofocus. Might be the wet Mac and glaucoma talking though lol.
I’ve never really delved into portrait photography, but this is a fantastic video! A ton of great info in a short time. Terrific job as always. Appreciate you guys. 😊👍🏼
Here's an idea for a portrait photoshoot if you're not gonna use strobes and reflectors etc. Go to an art gallery, get the subject to stand say 10 feet or more in front of a large painting(s) then use a long focal length with wide aperture to take your shots. Don't know how this might turn out but I think it would work well.
I bought a TTArtisan and use it on an APS-C camera so it is a 50mm equivalent. It is a great lens for portrait and street photography. I was concerned with not having stabilization or autofocus. The lens comes with a 30 day trail. I found that it worked for me from the first day and I am extremely satisfied. On sale I got f1.4 lens for $63. Hard to beat.
Definite yes for the 80-200 f2.8 on my Nikon. D7000. The most versatile lens I have with spectacular results. This is an older lens with no image stabilisation or built in auto focus, but is simple and rugged. Downside, it is heavy.
You can get a 1Ds MK III, EF 50mm f/1.2, and an 85mm f/1.2 for sub $3k these days. Maybe closer to $2k. If you can’t make a good portrait out of that kit, I can’t help you.
I would recommend the Canon 5D and Mark II for an older DSLR, really cheap now but fantastic image results in controlled situations. I think of them as like a classic car, might not be what you need everyday but worth to have for a special day
Great video, as always. No reason to go with brand new unless you have surplus money or need/want some new feature, or have a special application that needs the new technology (like the insane new bodies with 100+ FPS for sports or Birds in Flight). All of my gear was purchased used, and I'm very happy with my results.
Nikon D300, Nikon DX 35/1.8, Nikon AF-D 50/1.8, and AF-70-210/4 with an SB-600 flash will set you back all of $400. If you need to go wider, the Tokina 12-24/4 is like $65 used.
I must say, I have been really happy with KEH. I have only purchased, but what an excellent experience. I enjoyed this episode on portraiture. Thank you both.
I just purchased a Nikon D850. Wanted to get your thoughts on a 24-70mm lens. Wasn’t sure on the Tamron, Sigma, or the Nikon version. No budget just want something that works best.
Been wanting to jump to the mirrorless world for the two reasons you mentioned but it has been cost prohibitive. Even tho it’s more work my nikon D700 and nikon 85mm 1.4 has given me years of enjoyment. I then added the nikon 50mm 1.8g which has increased in price but still a very affordable solution for indoor shots.
Canon 5d mark II with Canon EF 100mm f2 USM, best price-performance ratio for the portraits, extremely sharp lens even by today' standard with great look of a bokeh. I challenge you all to find something better for 700€.
I kind of notice the details, thank for the video and for using stuff that’s within financial reach of the average enthusiast and not all that profoto stuff.
i have a question about the video here itself, i've noticed a few youtube videos way over exposed compared to the others and this is one of them, not like a bit but 10 stops etc now the video itself is shot and edited properly but for some reason its showing as well over exposed, so my question is is there anything different your side that may cause it compared to others as its like one in 3 months videos i see that present like this, never seen it on you channel before i'm using a 2022 macbook
What I love in this vid is how you guys play and tease (without being obvious about it) but if you look good at the vid and body language then you see these things which it actually makes sweet between you two :)
@ 9:30 thr 1.2 wud have been good if the bright window was not coming in frame, look at his shoulder getting soft at that side and difference in contrast on both arms
I sometimes wonder how I was able to take good pix with just a film camera and manual focus lenses in the 70/80/90's. Autofocus with the Eos 1 was a game changer for me as my eyes not the best but the MOST important talent/skill is the ability to see. Perhaps AI will fix that in next 10 yrs!
But U can't compare (under science conditions) from Tony wt the Kitchen (natural light / cheap flash / Strobe Softbox)... the first both are shooter against the Background light from the window and the last one is taken with the light from left side window.... ;) It would look also better against No1 with the cheap flash, if you shoot it straight in his face.... ;)
We've learned a lot over the years from these two. An awesome couple and fun people too👌And..great books too! We're not even related (say hi to mom)! Take care you guys..back out to move more d... snow.....🙃
thank you for this video, this comes to me in an exact moment, yesterday a family in the small town i'm living saw me taking some pictures and asked me to take pictures of them near the river, they want to have some prints. i just have a sony alpha 6000 and a sigma 30mm 1.4, i just need the difusor and reflector kit and i think i'm ready to try to make my first camera "work" (just training for free), they are not demanding, but I'm ready to give my best. thank you
I would suggest getting a 50 f1.8 for that Sony. It will give you the equivalent of a 75mm, which is ideal for portraits. You should be able to find one fairly inexpensively.
@@amberhawke that's 10 times what i'm about to expend in reflector difusor kit, and it's way less necesary, I can do portraits with a 45mm equivalent, stop thinking buying gear is the solution to bad pictures
@@julianmarinoramos2302All I’m doing is giving you a suggestion that would enhance your work. I didn’t mention it because of Gear Acquisition Syndrome, I suggested it because it would give a more pleasant, flattering look to your portrait subject. Look at 7 or so minutes in, when Tony shoots Chelsea at various focal lengths. At 24mm, Chelsea’s face is looking wide and bloated, her nose flattened and wide. Not very flattering. But at 70 going up to 200mm, her face becomes nice and elongated, her nose becomes properly proportioned to her face. It’s a much more flattering shot. If you are going to shoot the family all together, then your 45mm equivalent will be fine, but if they want individual portraits, a longer equivalent focal length lens starting at 70mm will give better results. It’s a matter of physics as well as how the brain interprets beauty.
I'm only a minute in and I'm like... this doesn't look good? I hope it's SONY. Tony should have been on the left. White hair and a blown out background.
If it makes you feel any better, that sensor/lens dust at 8:15 was distracting, but on a recent episode of Bosch: Legacy, they had sensor dust in a scene. And I think their budget per episode was a little bit higher than yours.😉
If you've got to accept things like lens flare, then don't just "accept it" and try to ignore it. Play around with it and practice with it so YOU learn to control where that lense flare shows up. Then you can use it with intention to add style to your photos rather than simply allowing it to ruin your shots at random.
I ask this myself on a regular base. Why "third"?? 🤔❓❓ Same in German... "Dritthersteller" Why? 😳🥺 Can somebody explain, please..🤗 Seriously...🤨 . Hi from Germany 🇪🇺🇩🇪👋🏼
Because second party in this context would describe the relationship between the buyer and seller. 3rd party(eg sigma) means it doesn't have any relationship between itself to Xxx company. So interestingly, since Sony owns part of Tamron, Tamron could be either first party or second party supplier towards sony.
Do get great deals on gear go to KEH.com Get 5% more for your gear! Sell to our sponsor KEH: SDP.io/SELL code NORTHRUP-SELL Get the best prices with a warranty at SDP.io/BUY + 5% coupon NORTHRUP-1
Cameras:
Older DSLR cameras have less tech but more savings: SDP.io/kehdslr
Full-frame DSLR fro more background blur and better low-light: SDP.io/ffdslr
Mirrorless cameras for newest tech: SDP.io/kehmirrorless
Lenses:
general lenses: SDP.io/kehlenses
A 50mm prime for affordable, fast, and sharp: SDP.io/keh50mm
a 24-70 that does everything: SDP.io/keh2470
A 70-200 for a classiv look: SDP.io/70200
An 85 for a unique look and bokeh galore: SDP.io/keh85
Lighting:
Flashes for budget lighting: SDP.io/kehflash
flash with TTL, more money but easier to use: SDP.io/kehttl
Strobes for more light options: SDP.io/kehstrobe
What was that lenses/smartphone??? 1:11
This video made my smart TV turn on its HDR and it became something bizarre, impossible to see. I had to watch it on my smartphone.
Been watching you guys since I was in highschool and now fast forward, I have my own studio. Time flies and your content and humor always keeps up, Proud and thankful for you both
I've spent my photography life trading "up" to bigger and better gear. Now I find myself trading "down" to smaller and lighter gear. Bigger isn't always better.
What's the lightest gear you have now?
@@da009999 I have 2 A7R5 cameras with a 24-70mm GM II and a 70-200mm GM II; an A7CII with a 20mm G, 50mm GM, and 85mm 1.8; and an a6600 with a 24mm G 2.8 and a 50mm G 2.5. Of course, any of the lenses can be used with any of the bodies. The a6600 with the tiny lenses are really fun to use.
It’s about what’s right for the situation. I shoot R5 but went back and bought great EF Lenses that have a different look.
Olympus!
@@da009999 The lightest gear I have now is my travel kit which consists of an A7CR, 16-25 G, 24-50 G, and 70-200 G II.
Yesssss…… Thank you for this video. It’s refreshing to see a video not based on the latest and greatest . Well done and very appreciated 😎📷
Huge fan of the reflector/defuser in portraiture. Great tips for beginner photographers who shouldn't and don't need to spend a lot of money to get started.
So much "cheap" stuff has lasted me for years. Probably used a nifty fifty for 6 years before upgrading. My only critique of buying an older DSLR now is that if you upgrade later, you need to rebuy lenses too, but some things like especially long lenses for wildlife or sports lenses, DSLR will be much cheaper. 1.8 lenses instead of 1.4 can be much cheaper. Third party lenses will often be cheaper with similar quality and you might loses some performance like AF speed or total sharpness, but with primes even the third party options will be generally sharp. I also usually buy a top end camera but get one model behind and/or used when new camera comes out because lots of people are interested in selling to upgrade.
The first portrait of Chelsea on the 5D mark II is so beautiful! It's so funny how the editing gives it away as a late 2000's portrait. 5D mark II can make modern looking portraits too just so the people know. ❤
Still use ours too👌
Mine just crapped out last year. I purchased it in 2009 lol. I got my money's worth out of it
This is great info. Most videos are about gear but this is a well rounded video. Really appreciate the end when you talk about interaction with the clients. Thank you so much for this.
Love this. A nice will rounded video. I find most RUclipsrs who give portrait advice are always hung up on the latest and greatest of everything. I've always thought, how the hell did they get to afford all the latest full frame cameras and lenses... And most are just like any one of us, that they started out possibly with an apsc or an entry level full frame and grew from there. I love how they're able to still give advice for the beginner/ amateur.
In most systems the 50 1.8 is practically a steal especailly for Canon R where I've seen it as low as $250 or less on sale. Nikon's is a bit more but still a good value for the money (or you can get the older F-mount version for about $220 vs the $629 for the Z version). But my point is if you want portraits on a budget, you really can't go wrong with a 50 1.8.
If you're really on a budget and cannot afford even a cheap softbox, get a stand with a clamp and you can also use a reflector/diffuser disc as shown earlier in the video, as your "soft box". It's not quite the same, but still should give you nice results (better than what you'd probably get with bare flash, even off-camera. In fact, you're probably going to get a reflector anyway so if you're on a budget, you could start with that and then work up to a softbox when you need to (plus reflectors are cheap so if you destroy them, not a big deal usually -- but softboxes can be expensive, as well as a good quality stand).
You guys have really improved since your first videos. Has it been ten years already? You’re so relaxed and even more dynamic now. Sorry Tony you’ve still got that mannequin look when Chelsea is on but wow your photography has truly excelled. Both of you actually. It’s been a pleasure and a joy watching you grow. You’ve always been my favorite go to hear heads. Thank you for your guidance over the years.
Always feel refreshed seeing these and has helped me to break out of my comfort zones. From prime lenses to vintage glass, telephoto vintage, and finding so much more control in manual focus as opposed to autofocus. Might be the wet Mac and glaucoma talking though lol.
I’ve never really delved into portrait photography, but this is a fantastic video! A ton of great info in a short time. Terrific job as always. Appreciate you guys. 😊👍🏼
Good old canon plastic fantastic nifty fifty best starter 50mm 1.8 lens. I learnt so much using that lens.
Here's an idea for a portrait photoshoot if you're not gonna use strobes and reflectors etc. Go to an art gallery, get the subject to stand say 10 feet or more in front of a large painting(s) then use a long focal length with wide aperture to take your shots. Don't know how this might turn out but I think it would work well.
I bought a TTArtisan and use it on an APS-C camera so it is a 50mm equivalent. It is a great lens for portrait and street photography.
I was concerned with not having stabilization or autofocus. The lens comes with a 30 day trail. I found that it worked for me from the first day and I am extremely satisfied.
On sale I got f1.4 lens for $63. Hard to beat.
RIGHT ON TIME! I have a portrait photo op this weekend, and I appreciate the info! Thanks...
Definite yes for the 80-200 f2.8 on my Nikon. D7000. The most versatile lens I have with spectacular results. This is an older lens with no image stabilisation or built in auto focus, but is simple and rugged. Downside, it is heavy.
I have the same lens. Tack sharp photos. I'm really pleased for having bought it used for less than $200.
try tiny yongnuo 40mm someday
Very nice guide for aspiring portrait photographers! Thank you both.
You can never be giving a full honest review without giving pros and cons of the three main sensor sizes (Full, crop, MFT)
You can get a 1Ds MK III, EF 50mm f/1.2, and an 85mm f/1.2 for sub $3k these days. Maybe closer to $2k. If you can’t make a good portrait out of that kit, I can’t help you.
2-3k okaaaaaay well
Y'all are indefatigable. Thanks for always delivering content that's timely and instructive.
Chelsea and Tony are such great teachers! Thank you!
Thank you for the great tip with the manual focus lenses. And those photos of Chelsea are fantastic!!!
Many thanks, Tony and Chelsea.
Great video as always.
GOD bless you both.
Half of my lenses are used. Recently got Viltrox 85mm (Nikon Z) for 300€. Not the best but fits the budget.
You both have been amazing help with learning all about photography. Thank you so much.
Congeniality personified, watching your channel is more a visit with a couple of friends that happen to know more about what interests me than I do.
I would recommend the Canon 5D and Mark II for an older DSLR, really cheap now but fantastic image results in controlled situations. I think of them as like a classic car, might not be what you need everyday but worth to have for a special day
I totally recommend it too, except for sports and wildlife. After getting used to it, I don't even touch my t8i except for the zoo or selfies
Great video, as always. No reason to go with brand new unless you have surplus money or need/want some new feature, or have a special application that needs the new technology (like the insane new bodies with 100+ FPS for sports or Birds in Flight). All of my gear was purchased used, and I'm very happy with my results.
No frills, just one of Your best vids. Hope to see You rockin‘ the BlaBla world for a long time.
Nikon D300, Nikon DX 35/1.8, Nikon AF-D 50/1.8, and AF-70-210/4 with an SB-600 flash will set you back all of $400. If you need to go wider, the Tokina 12-24/4 is like $65 used.
Beautiful portraits! Chelsea makes such a good model 😊
Absolutely, Chelsea is truly beautiful.
It has been really helpful, thank you, Tony and Chelsea !
I must say, I have been really happy with KEH. I have only purchased, but what an excellent experience. I enjoyed this episode on portraiture. Thank you both.
60p hdr looks great. What made you change to hdr?
I just purchased a Nikon D850. Wanted to get your thoughts on a 24-70mm lens. Wasn’t sure on the Tamron, Sigma, or the Nikon version. No budget just want something that works best.
Been wanting to jump to the mirrorless world for the two reasons you mentioned but it has been cost prohibitive. Even tho it’s more work my nikon D700 and nikon 85mm 1.4 has given me years of enjoyment. I then added the nikon 50mm 1.8g which has increased in price but still a very affordable solution for indoor shots.
Good combo. I have a D610 with a 50mm f1.4 and a 24-120mm f1.4
Getting the 85mm f1.4 next then add a D810.
Thank you for the heads up on the used equipment!
Canon 5d mark II with Canon EF 100mm f2 USM, best price-performance ratio for the portraits, extremely sharp lens even by today' standard with great look of a bokeh. I challenge you all to find something better for 700€.
Noti gang!!!!! Best photography RUclipsrs
I've been searching for such information everywhere on ytb. Excellent stuff! Great job as always! Thanks
Video camera used for kitchen scene has a dust spot on sensor
You can bounce the light off of the ceiling and get really nice photos 📸.
Love all your videos, but this one in particular (for me anyway) is really good. Very informative as well as entertaining!
Great video as always. I learnt so much.
Thanks for the video, just a heads up the PPA link no longer works.
I kind of notice the details, thank for the video and for using stuff that’s within financial reach of the average enthusiast and not all that profoto stuff.
😮 the beard is slowly coming back! I wanna see a full bearded Santa Tony.
More on posing, please.
I've been watching these two long enough that when Chelsea said she "skipped old lady school" I was able to laugh along sympathetically.
i have a question about the video here itself, i've noticed a few youtube videos way over exposed compared to the others and this is one of them, not like a bit but 10 stops etc
now the video itself is shot and edited properly but for some reason its showing as well over exposed, so my question is is there anything different your side that may cause it compared to others as its like one in 3 months videos i see that present like this,
never seen it on you channel before
i'm using a 2022 macbook
What I love in this vid is how you guys play and tease (without being obvious about it) but if you look good at the vid and body language then you see these things which it actually makes sweet between you two :)
Great vid as always. Laden with gems. Cheers guys ❤
7:09 was the best shot!
Helps to have a good subject :)
@ 9:30 thr 1.2 wud have been good if the bright window was not coming in frame, look at his shoulder getting soft at that side and difference in contrast on both arms
Old lenses with less elements/groups have more character than modern lenses.
Chelsea pls make a video for posing we can show to new models or family asking for portraits! Thx.
YES
Where did you find an AD600 pro and softbox for $300?
great video I was looking for a lot of time before.. well done! A little late for me jajaja Next make a guide for apc sensors and thats complete
Cheap? 2nd hand Olympus 45/1.8 and some EPL-5, EPL-6.. small, easy to use and results are very good.
iPhones' signature "jaundice/tomato" skin tone at 1:43. Chelsea deserves better than that garbage iOS auto-processing.
Great video as usual. You guys rock!! 💪
Thank you. Great advise
"Date the Rate"... lol. That caught me off guard😊
I sometimes wonder how I was able to take good pix with just a film camera and manual focus lenses in the 70/80/90's. Autofocus with the Eos 1 was a game changer for me as my eyes not the best but the MOST important talent/skill is the ability to see. Perhaps AI will fix that in next 10 yrs!
Bribes and kickbacks abound with KEH to Chelsea and Tony
👍 Good reminders 👍
Tell your subject to say "Cheese Fart" and be ready to hit the button that'll get a great natural smile lol
But U can't compare (under science conditions) from Tony wt the Kitchen (natural light / cheap flash / Strobe Softbox)... the first both are shooter against the Background light from the window and the last one is taken with the light from left side window.... ;) It would look also better against No1 with the cheap flash, if you shoot it straight in his face.... ;)
We've learned a lot over the years from these two. An awesome couple and fun people too👌And..great books too! We're not even related (say hi to mom)! Take care you guys..back out to move more d... snow.....🙃
I love how I am a professional photographer who has owned all sorts of expensive gear and am watching this. Ah well... I'm a Camera nerd I admit it.
thank you for this video, this comes to me in an exact moment, yesterday a family in the small town i'm living saw me taking some pictures and asked me to take pictures of them near the river, they want to have some prints. i just have a sony alpha 6000 and a sigma 30mm 1.4, i just need the difusor and reflector kit and i think i'm ready to try to make my first camera "work" (just training for free), they are not demanding, but I'm ready to give my best. thank you
I would suggest getting a 50 f1.8 for that Sony. It will give you the equivalent of a 75mm, which is ideal for portraits. You should be able to find one fairly inexpensively.
@@amberhawke that's 10 times what i'm about to expend in reflector difusor kit, and it's way less necesary, I can do portraits with a 45mm equivalent, stop thinking buying gear is the solution to bad pictures
@@julianmarinoramos2302All I’m doing is giving you a suggestion that would enhance your work. I didn’t mention it because of Gear Acquisition Syndrome, I suggested it because it would give a more pleasant, flattering look to your portrait subject. Look at 7 or so minutes in, when Tony shoots Chelsea at various focal lengths. At 24mm, Chelsea’s face is looking wide and bloated, her nose flattened and wide. Not very flattering. But at 70 going up to 200mm, her face becomes nice and elongated, her nose becomes properly proportioned to her face. It’s a much more flattering shot.
If you are going to shoot the family all together, then your 45mm equivalent will be fine, but if they want individual portraits, a longer equivalent focal length lens starting at 70mm will give better results. It’s a matter of physics as well as how the brain interprets beauty.
How it went?
Make a video comparing cheap camera with expensive lens and expensive camera with cheap lens.
Old lady school! LOL
I'm only a minute in and I'm like... this doesn't look good? I hope it's SONY. Tony should have been on the left. White hair and a blown out background.
If it makes you feel any better, that sensor/lens dust at 8:15 was distracting, but on a recent episode of Bosch: Legacy, they had sensor dust in a scene. And I think their budget per episode was a little bit higher than yours.😉
Tony is a handsome Golden Retriever.
If only I knew where I could go to get affordable used cameras and lenses....
Alfred Krupp by Arnold Newman... 12:08
If you've got to accept things like lens flare, then don't just "accept it" and try to ignore it. Play around with it and practice with it so YOU learn to control where that lense flare shows up. Then you can use it with intention to add style to your photos rather than simply allowing it to ruin your shots at random.
Please stick to SDR videos, HDR becomes uncomfortable in small screen specially at night
Soooo i need rf 85 1.2 ??((
Tony says KEH like CAGE
Noooo please no HDR, it's driving me nuts!!! It's aaalways on full brightness and I hate it
The realtor from hell....LOL
where are the second party lenses? if there's first party lenses and third party lenses...
Second party lens is the lens you made yourself 😂
I ask this myself on a regular base. Why "third"?? 🤔❓❓
Same in German... "Dritthersteller" Why? 😳🥺 Can somebody explain, please..🤗 Seriously...🤨
.
Hi from Germany 🇪🇺🇩🇪👋🏼
Because second party in this context would describe the relationship between the buyer and seller.
3rd party(eg sigma) means it doesn't have any relationship between itself to Xxx company.
So interestingly, since Sony owns part of Tamron, Tamron could be either first party or second party supplier towards sony.
This is a perfect example of the truth that gear doesn't equate to quality results. Know-how does!
That was funny, the realtor from hell.
Nice video on lighting. Chelsea looks hot
Do you rate yourself as a better photographer than
your dad?
Enough of KEH already!
Love skipped old lady school
HDR videos suck!
Most people don't feel that way