Happy Monday everyone and thank you for being so patient! We’ve been super excited to drive this one since Mazda first announced it last year and it’s a welcome upgrade over the CX-30 and CX-5 in space, capability, design, and comfort. We’re very excited to see the electrified option Mazda has planned in the near future. We also wanted to clarify, this vehicle technically shares the newer platform with the current Mazda3 and CX-30, not the older CX-5 platform. We imagine a lot of people may mistake it for a CX-5 platform but it’s the reason why the rear suspension is a non-independent torsion beam, instead of the multi-link setup in the CX-5.
Well you never read replies. Set your camera to Shutter priority mode and change the shutter speed to stop all the LEDs from flickering. It’s super annoying :-)
This is a design that will appeal to both the eye and the mind for many years to come. Nothing offensive, only athletic, rounded lines with no angularity. Well done, Mazda. Keep 'em coming!
The only "OFF ROAD" 99.9% of these vehicles are ever going to experience is a unplowed parking lot at Whole Foods or perhaps a gravel driveway on the way to a vacation cabin rental.
I would own one of these in the lower trim with the 17’s and take that bad boy all over dirt and gravel logging roads in the Sierras. It’s like a cooler looking Subaru with no CVT. If you want to do real off reading get an old beater SUV
Excellent review as usual guys. The CR-50 is certainly one of the best looking CUV/SUV vehicles in the entire industry. Also love how well made the brand is. Thank you again.
This car was parked near my bank and I fell in love instantly. I know that before I go to the dealership I had to watch Redline Reviews to ensure I make the right decision before I buy.
Got a 2022 CX-5 earlier this year, absolutely love it. Really excited to see where this new vehicle goes, maybe I'll get a newer year model years and years from now ;)
Awesome review! Seriously man you are gifted in front of the camera! I would take a lower trim package with the 17’s and take the softer ride and cheaper tires. Would feel more comfortable taking that on dirt and gravel roads than some 20’s
@@matsudakodo I still love it so much although I do with that it had a little more power horsepower and torque wise and some of the button placement was different like for the 360 camera but all in all a very nice truck !!
Never been a big fan of Mazda SUVs but this one def caught my eye.. great looks from inside and out with a decent powertrain. With the starting price of $26k, its a looker. But I'd hold off on the first model as they are subject to a few imperfections, i'd wait for the 2nd year or so. Great job Mazda and great job REDLINE for this informative review!
It short shifts because it’s tuned for all the power to be in the low and mid range. It falls off above 5,000rpm and there would be no benefit to revving up beyond that and actually be slower
Yeah, I have a ‘22 CX-5 Signature and it has a ton of low end torque, but the power band drops off a cliff when you get above 4000 or so rpms. These Mazda turbos are definitely not designed for “flooring it.” You get way more out of it by just pushing the pedal down a little bit more when you really need the power.
I've been thinking about purchasing this car, your review just helped me making up my mind, will be getting one soon with the same color and trim, thank you guys!
@@wazgoodjj Thank you for your precious advice, we already have a new RAV4 Hybrid Prime for my wife, it is truly amazing! I just don't want 2 same cars.😁
I have watched a few videos of the CX-50, and haven’t been all that impressed with the exterior design. Yesterday, I happened to see my first one on the road and was quite impressed by what I saw in person. It definitely turned my head and carried quite a presence. It was a dark gray with dark wheels. While Mazdas usually all look alike, I didn’t know what it was until I saw the Mazda emblem on the grill. Definitely a top vehicle in this class. Excluding luxury brands, the Hyundai Tucson and this CX-50 are the only vehicles that stand out. The interior of this CX-50 has some pretty leather, but otherwise looks dated. Others reviewers have also mentioned a cheaper feel to the fit and finish of this Mazda.
I'm really surprised that the base turbo model doesn't come with the Bose sound system. It starts at $37,525 (including destination), just like the Premium Plus with the NA engine.
@@davis6123 cx70 will be in a different league and price tag. The features I listed are the things cars from other brands that are on the same league already have.
What's the deal people making it seems having a full digital display is better ??? When all they do is still the same task ??? Even Rolls-Royce are still analog lol
@@MonicaHolly143 Monica, everybody is different yes analog gauges have been around a looong time in cars and trucks and they will never go away. if people like techno pop 21st century digital gauges then go for it. it depends on what people like
@@MonicaHolly143 Hi Monica, I personally think these are the two reasons why I want a digital gauge. 1. Abundance of info. The digital display is more customizable than analog, and it can display every piece of info you need. It is the place where we look the most when driving beside the road ahead. This is like an Apple watch VS a traditional Rolex watch, digital can offer more than just time, and it can be customized. 2. Value comparison. If we all pay 35k for a car, we'd expect to get all the similar features among the options we have. I know that Nissan already went digital with Rouge.
I am not convinced - At $43k there are a lot of plastic inside and out. The 6 speed trans is dated as well. Can't wait to see what the hybrid has to offer...
@@dtay8913 Nothing wrong with analog gauges, they are simple and work just fine. Digital gauges are very laggy and can be a problem as they age... But it's my opinion, you can stick with your opinion on it but I'm just stating I rather have analog.
@@dtay8913 I understand you're point, I'm just one of those people who prefer simplicity over "modern". Same goes with the transmission, I agree they need to replace it but they are still a small company and the 6 speed is actually reliable, so I can see why they use it.
This seems to be a common practice now, with dealerships knowing they can gouge buyers to make up for lost business during pandemic. They can suck it....I'm going to keep my vehicle for 2-3 years longer in response to dealerships doing this. By then, I wouldn't be surprised if we go into a recession, at which point, not only do I not expect to pay markup, but the dealerships will be offering big discounts due to any potential lack of demand if this recession happens.
A very good design to a great design. I had a Mazda 626 LX (1988) that I got in August of '88. My model had a 133 cubic inch 4 in line. The horsepower was a measly 110 at 130 foot pound torque. Got that car at a top speed of 94 m.p.h. trying to catch a hot Porsche one day...that's the last of my "speed chasing" which was few in my years of driving. The one thing that Mazda promote back then for a few years was their "Twin Trapezoidal Links", which today are (?) multi-link suspension in the rear of cars. One noticeable thing on the engine sound...it sounds great. To me, 6 speeds gets the job done fine over the 7, 8, and 9 speed models. Less gears mean less break down in the transmission (?). I like the design of this car! Consumer Reports rate Mazda make cars literally on top of reliability. Maybe...this car will replace my nearly 18 year old Subaru Forester. At least one thing...they had a winning car at LeMans in '88.
Mazda needs to address: - driver screen - speed.. 0-60 less than 7, 🎯 6.5 - painted trim on highest spec - 12 In center display - remove that center accent from seats - blackout accent trim option - remove old school shifter - usb c everything - 40/20/40 split rear seat - add a PHEV version - FIX that rear suspension
We get better MPG that what the EPA says to expect. Steady cruising on the highway will easily get you more than 30 MPG. If you drive more aggressively, you’ll get less.
I can’t wait to try one out. The base turbo model seems well optioned for the money. For me it would see the beach and occasional snow so it should be perfect for that.
Thanks for the awesome review. Your delivery of the details and spec is so smooth and easy to understand. Keep the videos interesting and informative, thanks Sofiyan.
I always thought the looks of the CX-5 were a little odd and egg-shaped. The CX-50 smooths all of that, includes a wider grill and an improved look all around . . . great! Inside . . . . hmmm that single vent up on the dash looks . . . a little odd. (waiting to see what Sofyan says about the seats . . . . . . . . . ) Okay, no issues. p.s.: I hope you stayed at a different hotel. That one has an unsavory reputation . . . . . . . . .
I really wish reviewers would start including headlight quality in their reviews. My morning commute at 6am is always in the dark and I consider good headlights as an important safety feature. I of course understand it's not possible in situations like this, but none of the reviewers ever talk about how good or bad the headlights are.
Mazda makes the most beautiful autos in general. The CX 60 looks inferior, they have abandoned the round headlihjts that could have been a trademark (as has BMW). The interiors are fantastic too, as is reliability, driveability and overall quality.
White CX60 looks weird. Don't know why they're focusing on that one while the red with black trim looks much, much better and actually might be better than the CX5.
Finally a reviewer the understands the CX50 isn't replacing the CX5. Two different markets. The CX50 is going after the Subaru market. The CX5 is going for the European market. By the time Mazda releases the new CX5 with the inline 6 my CX5 Signature will be ready for trade.
Mazda got this one right. The only thing i don't like might be the screen if it limits you from doing more. But this car you can tell Mazda put some soul into it...
Great job guys. Rob both stand ups look awesome. You are not shooting up at hiim thank you! Great ending location for close. The walking in the stand ups is almost looking natural now, not like walking on fire…great job guys!
I’ve owned 3 CX-5s. Have a 2021 now. The 6 speed is bulletproof. I’ll be buying the CX-50 as my next vehicle and have no problem with the engine and transmission combination. Do wish the CX-50 had a manual option since it’s being marketed as off road.
@@coolbasset I love the look and I love the CX5 as well. I wish they didn't market this as an off roader though. No underbody protection and seems like dismal ground clearance for any actual off roading. Kind of annoying that companies blatantly put out fake off roaders even though I love mazdas
They removed a lot of features from lower trim levels for CX-50 when these features are available on lower trim levels for CX-5. I guess that’s the cost of cx-50 being manufactured in USA?
What are your thoughts on Fisker Ocean EV. I see the price is affordable and the lease for $379 a month with 30,000 miles a yr. I've been looking at ocean and the price is affordable and no dealer markups.
@@BMWWolf That’s like saying- “I like the old 4” iPhone 4 screen, I don’t need new tech. But I’m willing to pay iphone 13 prices for my iPhone 4 for the “esthetic” See my point now?
@@eBikify there'sa reason why rolls rolce still prefer analog gauges lol Lol u comparing to iphone 4 and iphone 13 is nonsense since both are digital screens lmao
If was shopping this segment and wanted a CUV with enough power to make me happy without breaking the bank, I'd most likely consider this or a Santa Fe 2.5t with HTRAC
What's up with the powertrains options? No eight speed transmission? Seems like Mazda is a bit behind the times in that regard. Otherwise, it appears to be a solid offering from Mazda. Always been a fan of their exterior and interior designs.
I agree. My guess is that it has to do with it being built on the same platform as the CX-30 (and Mazda3), which was built to accommodate the 6 speed transmission. The upcoming CX-60 is built on their new RWD platform and will utilize the new 8 speed transmission.
The Mazda 6-speed automatic transmission is very reliable, so there's no reason to replace it. On the other hand, Toyota's 8-speed automatic, about 2 years ago, proved to not be reliable when a million 8-speed auto transmissions failed, resulting in a class action lawsuit.
@@SokemRokemRobot exactly and thank you for stating those facts. I’ve owned 5 Mazdas and never had transmission issues. I currently have a 2016 Mazda 3 and a 2021 Mazda CX-5.
Why do you continue to test 0-60 times on slight inclines, when you know it is going to come out slower? I also wish the pano roof opened all the way, and the quality seemed to drop once you got in the back seats. Otherwise, great review!
When we’re on these short media drives, it’s hard to find the perfect road to do the 0-60 test. We often will retest it back home at a later date and compare the times to our first drive.
To make the CX-50 look more rugged, there should be less wheel, and more tire. The 19" wheels make it look more like a pimp mobile than a rugged vehicle.
I was in Santa Barbara same time near hotel California and CX-50s were popping up in my wifi list but I couldn't spot one, looked around for 20 minutes lol!
I originally chose Mazda because they DON’T do touchscreens. Not all of us want fingerprints all over everything. This was on my short list coming out of a 2021 CX9, but the light headliner is a dealbreaker. It stands out so badly. Love the terra-cotta seats! Also, the lack of air vents up front might be challenging to cool the vehicle in Florida heat. The pano roof is a bummer too for Florida. It just heats up the car. My hope now is that the Euro CX60 replaces the CX5 for 2025, which would create a solid naming structure across the lineup. That’s now my prediction after the CX70 reveal. Nice review, thanks.
Went in for the preferred plus package. Almost 35k. But the dealer marks ups raised it to 42k . I’ll just wait till the car markets cools down and get the cx50 with the Toyota hybrid model . 24 mpg is bad.
I like the refreshed exterior, it looks very sharp. I definitely prefer the CX-50’s looks over the Cx-5. One thing tho-maybe I live in a bubble but are people clamoring for plastic cladding?
@@2004cyrus This reply I guess is to Mazda and not you 😊. These vehicles will never go off road. No more than the CX 30 which is also covered in cladding. Whatever the reason for the cladding, “off-roading” isn’t it. 😊
I've got a 2023 CX-50 preferred plus model on its way. I'm trading in my 2019 CX-5. The dealership says it's about 3-4 weeks away from arriving. I'm super excited 😄
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Happy Monday everyone and thank you for being so patient! We’ve been super excited to drive this one since Mazda first announced it last year and it’s a welcome upgrade over the CX-30 and CX-5 in space, capability, design, and comfort. We’re very excited to see the electrified option Mazda has planned in the near future. We also wanted to clarify, this vehicle technically shares the newer platform with the current Mazda3 and CX-30, not the older CX-5 platform. We imagine a lot of people may mistake it for a CX-5 platform but it’s the reason why the rear suspension is a non-independent torsion beam, instead of the multi-link setup in the CX-5.
I believe the correct term is Torture Beam Rear Suspension. 😁
Heard a cx70 coming out soon
Slow AF
Well you never read replies. Set your camera to Shutter priority mode and change the shutter speed to stop all the LEDs from flickering. It’s super annoying :-)
@@Eric_In_SF Thanks for the tip, and we try to read all comments, but sometimes a few good ones will slip through the cracks. We’ll look into it!
This is a design that will appeal to both the eye and the mind for many years to come. Nothing offensive, only athletic, rounded lines with no angularity. Well done, Mazda. Keep 'em coming!
The only "OFF ROAD" 99.9% of these vehicles are ever going to experience is a unplowed parking lot at Whole Foods or perhaps a gravel driveway on the way to a vacation cabin rental.
And so g63 and lexus LXs and so on..
What was your quantitative analysis to determine that 99.9%?🤔
I would own one of these in the lower trim with the 17’s and take that bad boy all over dirt and gravel logging roads in the Sierras. It’s like a cooler looking Subaru with no CVT. If you want to do real off reading get an old beater SUV
@@JulezWinnfield My quantitative analysis...
Show me the definitive proof of any of them ever going off road intentionally.
@@natlovell122 you probably haven't taken them over any roads that any two-wheel drive car with proper tires couldn't easily do either.
It has all the right ingredients. This is a slam-dunk for Mazda! Unfortunately the dealer markups are going to reflect that big time!
Fuel efficiency isn’t that good considering current gas prices and no hybrids at launch
Yes!! Our local dealer told me today that there will be $4K markup on cx50 smh then I probably won’t consider it anymore
@@f181234 depends on what MPG figures you think are good. 23 city/29 hwy isn't good? I beg to differ. Better than the Honda Passport TrailSport.
@DavidRC still tho no hybrids at launch is disappointing in 2022 there not new technology
@@rkgsd passport is way bigger than this and uses a V6 this is more closer in size to the Subaru Outback
The way Sofy can just go through all the features so smoothly and easy is just amazing. Love you Sofy!
It’s so impressive, how does he remember it all!
yepp agreed, he is very smooth. It's a pleasure to watch his reviews.
Excellent review as usual guys. The CR-50 is certainly one of the best looking CUV/SUV vehicles in the entire industry. Also love how well made the brand is. Thank you again.
This car was parked near my bank and I fell in love instantly. I know that before I go to the dealership I had to watch Redline Reviews to ensure I make the right decision before I buy.
Finally, a mazda with struts for the hood!
i just love the way this one looks aesthetically. Mazda nailed the design cue's of this!
Got a 2022 CX-5 earlier this year, absolutely love it. Really excited to see where this new vehicle goes, maybe I'll get a newer year model years and years from now ;)
Finally, the review we were waiting for!
Awesome review! Seriously man you are gifted in front of the camera! I would take a lower trim package with the 17’s and take the softer ride and cheaper tires. Would feel more comfortable taking that on dirt and gravel roads than some 20’s
Omg really? Misquoting platform over and over and injecting tons of personal opinions and mostly negative
I just got the 2023 cx-50 fully loaded and wow it’s amazing I love it and just wanna drive everywhere
Still getting on with it after one year?
@@matsudakodo I still love it so much although I do with that it had a little more power horsepower and torque wise and some of the button placement was different like for the 360 camera but all in all a very nice truck !!
CX-50 looks amazing. I would definitely be interested in the hybrid model.
same!!!
Yes, finally the review I've been waiting for! 😍
Never been a big fan of Mazda SUVs but this one def caught my eye.. great looks from inside and out with a decent powertrain. With the starting price of $26k, its a looker. But I'd hold off on the first model as they are subject to a few imperfections, i'd wait for the 2nd year or so. Great job Mazda and great job REDLINE for this informative review!
It short shifts because it’s tuned for all the power to be in the low and mid range. It falls off above 5,000rpm and there would be no benefit to revving up beyond that and actually be slower
Yeah, I have a ‘22 CX-5 Signature and it has a ton of low end torque, but the power band drops off a cliff when you get above 4000 or so rpms. These Mazda turbos are definitely not designed for “flooring it.” You get way more out of it by just pushing the pedal down a little bit more when you really need the power.
The 2.5 SkyActiv-G Turbo i4, when unleaded fuel is used, develops 227hp and 310 lb-ft of torque
It has been unleaded for at least thirty years.
I'm very surprised that this high end model does not have fog lights.
I like the styling of this one!
Why no fog lights ?
Lights on at night are bright. No need for extra bulbs to replace.
I want this car badly lol. Reading all reviews
Great review. Considering the relationship with Toyota, I hope they don’t go down the path of a CVT when they decide to introduce the hybrid.
I've been thinking about purchasing this car, your review just helped me making up my mind, will be getting one soon with the same color and trim, thank you guys!
Go with a RAV 4 Prime Hybrid. Faster, same price and way better MPG. Plus you don't need to put premium gas.
@@wazgoodjj Thank you for your precious advice, we already have a new RAV4 Hybrid Prime for my wife, it is truly amazing! I just don't want 2 same cars.😁
@@wazgoodjj, you don't have to put premium gas in this car.
Just bought one yesterday. The turbo premium plus or whatever it’s called. Really enjoying it
I have watched a few videos of the CX-50, and haven’t been all that impressed with the exterior design. Yesterday, I happened to see my first one on the road and was quite impressed by what I saw in person. It definitely turned my head and carried quite a presence. It was a dark gray with dark wheels.
While Mazdas usually all look alike, I didn’t know what it was until I saw the Mazda emblem on the grill. Definitely a top vehicle in this class. Excluding luxury brands, the Hyundai Tucson and this CX-50 are the only vehicles that stand out. The interior of this CX-50 has some pretty leather, but otherwise looks dated. Others reviewers have also mentioned a cheaper feel to the fit and finish of this Mazda.
Nice car, but after dealer markups and mandatory “add-ons” probably going to be out of reach for most people.
I'm really surprised that the base turbo model doesn't come with the Bose sound system. It starts at $37,525 (including destination), just like the Premium Plus with the NA engine.
A lot of people don’t care about the premium stereo and don’t want to pay for it. I love the Bose personally
Compared to Toyota RAV4 and Honda CRV, this looks amazing
As a cx-5 owner, I would at least expect
1. Full digital gauge
2. 8-speed transmission
3. 360 views on more trims. (good for offroad too)
New CX-70 will have all of these things. CX-60 which is the non-US version of the upcoming CX-70 looks lovely.
@@davis6123 cx70 will be in a different league and price tag. The features I listed are the things cars from other brands that are on the same league already have.
What's the deal people making it seems having a full digital display is better ???
When all they do is still the same task ???
Even Rolls-Royce are still analog lol
@@MonicaHolly143 Monica, everybody is different yes analog gauges have been around a looong time in cars and trucks and they will never go away. if people like techno pop 21st century digital gauges then go for it. it depends on what people like
@@MonicaHolly143 Hi Monica, I personally think these are the two reasons why I want a digital gauge.
1. Abundance of info. The digital display is more customizable than analog, and it can display every piece of info you need. It is the place where we look the most when driving beside the road ahead. This is like an Apple watch VS a traditional Rolex watch, digital can offer more than just time, and it can be customized.
2. Value comparison. If we all pay 35k for a car, we'd expect to get all the similar features among the options we have. I know that Nissan already went digital with Rouge.
Amazing review, as always. I’m most impressed with how you didn’t bat an eye with all those bugs flying around lol.
Those bugs just wouldn’t stop bugging us! 💀😂
I am not convinced - At $43k there are a lot of plastic inside and out. The 6 speed trans is dated as well. Can't wait to see what the hybrid has to offer...
And analog gauges
@@dtay8913 Nothing wrong with analog gauges, they are simple and work just fine. Digital gauges are very laggy and can be a problem as they age... But it's my opinion, you can stick with your opinion on it but I'm just stating I rather have analog.
@@kellyoubrejr544 I respect that 100% but the industry constantly scrutinizes vehicles that don't. Chevrolet traverse, Cadillac, etc.
Mazda is a small company that doesn't have much R&D money, so they have to choose where the money goes.
@@dtay8913 I understand you're point, I'm just one of those people who prefer simplicity over "modern". Same goes with the transmission, I agree they need to replace it but they are still a small company and the 6 speed is actually reliable, so I can see why they use it.
Sounds like they are pumping in a different engine note now too
I noticed that too!
The thing that seals the deal for me is no CVT that all their direct competition offers. It may only be a 6 speed but it's not a CVT. Smart!
Nice comprehensive review. What kind of sunglasses is Sofyan wearing?
6:16 yes, what more have off-road enthusiasts been asking for than a pano roof
Rob adding more weight?!?!? SNAP!! Keep up the great content guys
Seems like a great car but a dealer wants 5,000 mark up, which makes it roughly 48k for turbo premium plus. Who would pay that much for Mazda?
No one
This seems to be a common practice now, with dealerships knowing they can gouge buyers to make up for lost business during pandemic. They can suck it....I'm going to keep my vehicle for 2-3 years longer in response to dealerships doing this. By then, I wouldn't be surprised if we go into a recession, at which point, not only do I not expect to pay markup, but the dealerships will be offering big discounts due to any potential lack of demand if this recession happens.
And if someone take with financing they pay another 4-5K
A very good design to a great design. I had a Mazda 626 LX (1988) that I got in August of '88. My model had a 133 cubic inch 4 in line. The horsepower was a measly 110 at 130 foot pound torque. Got that car at a top speed of 94 m.p.h. trying to catch a hot Porsche one day...that's the last of my "speed chasing" which was few in my years of driving. The one thing that Mazda promote back then for a few years was their "Twin Trapezoidal Links", which today are (?) multi-link suspension in the rear of cars.
One noticeable thing on the engine sound...it sounds great. To me, 6 speeds gets the job done fine over the 7, 8, and 9 speed models. Less gears mean less break down in the transmission (?).
I like the design of this car! Consumer Reports rate Mazda make cars literally on top of reliability. Maybe...this car will replace my nearly 18 year old Subaru Forester. At least one thing...they had a winning car at LeMans in '88.
Mazda needs to address:
- driver screen
- speed.. 0-60 less than 7, 🎯 6.5
- painted trim on highest spec
- 12 In center display
- remove that center accent from seats
- blackout accent trim option
- remove old school shifter
- usb c everything
- 40/20/40 split rear seat
- add a PHEV version
- FIX that rear suspension
No rear cross monitoring or auto rear brake? What about crash avoidance system?
We get better MPG that what the EPA says to expect. Steady cruising on the highway will easily get you more than 30 MPG. If you drive more aggressively, you’ll get less.
I can’t wait to try one out. The base turbo model seems well optioned for the money. For me it would see the beach and occasional snow so it should be perfect for that.
Thanks for the awesome review. Your delivery of the details and spec is so smooth and easy to understand. Keep the videos interesting and informative, thanks Sofiyan.
love the editing in this vid
I always thought the looks of the CX-5 were a little odd and egg-shaped. The CX-50 smooths all of that, includes a wider grill and an improved look all around . . . great!
Inside . . . . hmmm that single vent up on the dash looks . . . a little odd.
(waiting to see what Sofyan says about the seats . . . . . . . . . ) Okay, no issues.
p.s.: I hope you stayed at a different hotel. That one has an unsavory reputation . . . . . . . . .
Junk head room sucks
Just test drove one and it's not even have a Turbo but it's really fast and comfortable, waiting for November to order one.
I really wish reviewers would start including headlight quality in their reviews. My morning commute at 6am is always in the dark and I consider good headlights as an important safety feature. I of course understand it's not possible in situations like this, but none of the reviewers ever talk about how good or bad the headlights are.
On the 0-60, did you have it in Sport mode? And did you step passed the kick-plate on the pedal?
Mazda makes the most beautiful autos in general. The CX 60 looks inferior, they have abandoned the round headlihjts that could have been a trademark (as has BMW). The interiors are fantastic too, as is reliability, driveability and overall quality.
White CX60 looks weird. Don't know why they're focusing on that one while the red with black trim looks much, much better and actually might be better than the CX5.
I liked the round taillights over the new half- rectangles too
Finally a reviewer the understands the CX50 isn't replacing the CX5. Two different markets. The CX50 is going after the Subaru market. The CX5 is going for the European market. By the time Mazda releases the new CX5 with the inline 6 my CX5 Signature will be ready for trade.
What fi you have 91 octane as your premium? Does it drop it to like 245HP? 93 is not available everywhere.
Mazda has it on there website on the power you have with 87 fyi.
@@seviper06 was asking about 91 octane not 87. 91 octane is premium where I live. Was wondering if it knocked the HP down since its not 93 premium?
Mazda got this one right. The only thing i don't like might be the screen if it limits you from doing more. But this car you can tell Mazda put some soul into it...
Will the meridian edition sit above the Premium Plus Package Trim or below it?
Meridian sits just above the Turbo in the lineup.
absolutely love the CX-50
All very welcome updates
Turbo should be available in lower trims.
Now this is a good looking vehicle
It has all the right ingredients.
Great job guys. Rob both stand ups look awesome. You are not shooting up at hiim thank you! Great ending location for close. The walking in the stand ups is almost looking natural now, not like walking on fire…great job guys!
How is the ride quality and road noise compared to the CX-5?
Front looks really good. But that plastic on the side is a no for me
Brand new SUV but with a decade old 6-speed automatic transmission? Very strange. CX-50 looks much better than the oddly proportioned CX-5.
Better than using a CVT
Even if it is a decade old transmission it means it's more reliable than others
It's honestly a good transmission though.
I’ve owned 3 CX-5s. Have a 2021 now. The 6 speed is bulletproof. I’ll be buying the CX-50 as my next vehicle and have no problem with the engine and transmission combination. Do wish the CX-50 had a manual option since it’s being marketed as off road.
@@coolbasset I love the look and I love the CX5 as well. I wish they didn't market this as an off roader though. No underbody protection and seems like dismal ground clearance for any actual off roading. Kind of annoying that companies blatantly put out fake off roaders even though I love mazdas
The piped in engine noise is one of the worst I have ever heard!
I like the 2023 Mazda CX-50 Premium Plus Turbo. It’s an awesome car to drive :)
I really like this. I wonder about waiting for the CX 70 with the inline 6, and the 8 speed DCT.
I’m waiting
@@2004cyrus this aged like milk
@@flashbang217 sure did
I’m really impressed by this model and I’m looking forward to purchase one soon. Thanks for the review!
They removed a lot of features from lower trim levels for CX-50 when these features are available on lower trim levels for CX-5. I guess that’s the cost of cx-50 being manufactured in USA?
Like what?
Great review!
I leased a 2021 cx5 last October and plan on getting this once the lease is up
So... which end does one put snow chains on? It has a magnetic rear disconnect. Something to ponder.
Great review Sofan ! This car is really niccceeee
Great car. The 6 speed auto is smooth and works fine. No need for an 8 speed or dct, it won't add anything to the mix.
Hmm not sure looks like a $40k car at all..
Any underbody protection?
What are your thoughts on Fisker Ocean EV. I see the price is affordable and the lease for $379 a month with 30,000 miles a yr. I've been looking at ocean and the price is affordable and no dealer markups.
Is the chime removal?
Why do reviewers do 0-100 in purely Auto mode and then complain about short shifting ?
Use the tiptronic, that’s what it’s there for jeeze!
Wow struts for the hood! Don’t recall the other Mazdas, but outside of luxury brands, I don’t think it’s often. Looks nice!
For the price, I would expect a fully digital gauge cluster like their competition has (such as Hyundai/kia/Nissan/ etc.)
A lot of people see a full digital dash as a negative. At least I do!
@@BMWWolf That’s like saying- “I like the old 4” iPhone 4 screen, I don’t need new tech. But I’m willing to pay iphone 13 prices for my iPhone 4 for the “esthetic”
See my point now?
Although I do agree, Mazda is not known for their technology, but rather on driving and handling.
From cx-60 onwards will use fully digital meter cluster and face recognition also.
@@eBikify there'sa reason why rolls rolce still prefer analog gauges lol
Lol u comparing to iphone 4 and iphone 13 is nonsense since both are digital screens lmao
Portland, JAMAICA in The Building !!!!!!!!!!!!!
If was shopping this segment and wanted a CUV with enough power to make me happy without breaking the bank, I'd most likely consider this or a Santa Fe 2.5t with HTRAC
What's up with the powertrains options? No eight speed transmission? Seems like Mazda is a bit behind the times in that regard. Otherwise, it appears to be a solid offering from Mazda. Always been a fan of their exterior and interior designs.
I agree. My guess is that it has to do with it being built on the same platform as the CX-30 (and Mazda3), which was built to accommodate the 6 speed transmission. The upcoming CX-60 is built on their new RWD platform and will utilize the new 8 speed transmission.
That’s coming on the new crossovers like CX-70 and CX-90
The Mazda 6-speed automatic transmission is very reliable, so there's no reason to replace it. On the other hand, Toyota's 8-speed automatic, about 2 years ago, proved to not be reliable when a million 8-speed auto transmissions failed, resulting in a class action lawsuit.
@@SokemRokemRobot exactly and thank you for stating those facts. I’ve owned 5 Mazdas and never had transmission issues. I currently have a 2016 Mazda 3 and a 2021 Mazda CX-5.
be interesting with a 10 speed or even an 8 speed automatic. performance? Gas mileage ?
Why do you continue to test 0-60 times on slight inclines, when you know it is going to come out slower? I also wish the pano roof opened all the way, and the quality seemed to drop once you got in the back seats. Otherwise, great review!
When we’re on these short media drives, it’s hard to find the perfect road to do the 0-60 test. We often will retest it back home at a later date and compare the times to our first drive.
To make the CX-50 look more rugged, there should be less wheel, and more tire. The 19" wheels make it look more like a pimp mobile than a rugged vehicle.
I was in Santa Barbara same time near hotel California and CX-50s were popping up in my wifi list but I couldn't spot one, looked around for 20 minutes lol!
There's lots of v6 and 3rd row options available at $42 k price point . Mazda needs to price their trims accordingly
The base engine starts are 27k
“And if you hate the sun in general…” 😂
Great video
As a CX30 owner that interior is disappointing especially that cheap plastic on the rear doors
Even the Mazda3 has soft-touch on the rear doors, and that's not at all expected for a compact car. I'm not sure what Mazda was thinking here.
The interior is a CX30 owner? I am confused.
Could Mazda have chosen a more annoying start up chime? they need to fix that asap.
I originally chose Mazda because they DON’T do touchscreens. Not all of us want fingerprints all over everything. This was on my short list coming out of a 2021 CX9, but the light headliner is a dealbreaker. It stands out so badly. Love the terra-cotta seats! Also, the lack of air vents up front might be challenging to cool the vehicle in Florida heat. The pano roof is a bummer too for Florida. It just heats up the car. My hope now is that the Euro CX60 replaces the CX5 for 2025, which would create a solid naming structure across the lineup. That’s now my prediction after the CX70 reveal. Nice review, thanks.
Went in for the preferred plus package. Almost 35k. But the dealer marks ups raised it to 42k . I’ll just wait till the car markets cools down and get the cx50 with the Toyota hybrid model . 24 mpg is bad.
What did you end up getting?
I thought the CX-50 was designed off the Mazda 3 platform? Overall excellent review.
I would buy this over the Honda cr-v for sure
Very Nice Bro! Get Good People!
I like the refreshed exterior, it looks very sharp. I definitely prefer the CX-50’s looks over the Cx-5. One thing tho-maybe I live in a bubble but are people clamoring for plastic cladding?
Apparently. Although I don’t understand why!
It's not refreshed, it's new.
Better than all the exposed paint while off roading mazda says
Refreshed. It’s a brand new Mazda model
@@2004cyrus This reply I guess is to Mazda and not you 😊. These vehicles will never go off road. No more than the CX 30 which is also covered in cladding. Whatever the reason for the cladding, “off-roading” isn’t it. 😊
I've got a 2023 CX-50 preferred plus model on its way. I'm trading in my 2019 CX-5. The dealership says it's about 3-4 weeks away from arriving. I'm super excited 😄
It's been 8 months since you posted... did you get it??
I've been waiting for the Hybrid version, when do you think they will launch that?
We’re thinking toward the end of this year? But Mazda was very tight lipped about it.