I feel like those considered a bit heavier in the distance running world are getting a more compliant feel out of this shoe. I certainly am at 213 lb. Not sure I'd use it if I were, say, 150, unless I felt a bit of give. Seems like there are many firm and springy options with lower stack height and lower cost for lighter runners. I also think this one is more compliant than version 1, but I could be bugging.
I ran my first marathon in the original Superblast. I recently got the Superblast 2 and have worn them for a few 6-mile runs with strides. They feel good. I like the upper more. They seem to feel firmer down the middle of the foam, but I like the ride.
I wanted to love these shoes, but for me (an athletic small woman) it felt like bricks on my feet, especially compared to the mach6 and the speed 4. I couldn’t run in them for more than 10km, because they gave me shin pain (had to rest for a day after each run). Sent them back and got the Mach X2 instead and I love them so far.
I have hit 300km in it this week and I love it. To me, it is a massive upgrade over the first version. More comfortable, better grip/durability, better fit and slightly softer feel. First shoe I bought a second pair of in advance (the sexy white colorway!)
@@Aron-t6m I have ran 500km in the first one and I like the SB2 more. Might be down to the better fit, but the midsole definitely feels better and less clunky at easier paces.
I have around 200 km in my superblast v1 and the midsole gets better and better the more i run. The superblast v2 after 10 km felt like a broken in v1, the traction is better and the upper is more comfortable: i find the fit more tuned in in the v2, the v1 was a bit too long in the same size. I too think that v2 will last less than v1 but i will run my october marathon in v2 because is more comfortable and i can't wait!
I wanted to love the superblast 2, but haven't felt the love that so many others have experienced. Recently put on 50 miles in the Saucony Pro 4, and I feel that could be called the Super-Dooper Blast, because it's everything the Superblast is only better. The Pro 4 is less aggressive than other Pro gen's, so it fits perfect as an everyday shoe but still is perfect as a race day shoe (if you had to pick 1 shoe).
I feel this is an interesting point, that ultimately actual super shoes may prove to be a fine long-term option for many. It's a controversial opinion right now due to the idea that running mechanics may be impacted to the point of causing injury, but I believe that mostly is the case when switching between them and conventional shoes as they can causes certain muscles in the foot to atrophy. I've seen a handful of older runners (70+) on reddit saying it's the only thing they can run in to prevent injuries. I personally am going to test this theory for myself w/ a pair of Plaid 1.5 (Chinese super shoes) over the next several months. The only other dig is the cost/lifetime, but we've seen reports of things like AP3s lasting a good 500+ miles for many, and many of the more advanced Chinese brand shoes have rubber that goes 1000+ miles and more durable foams like TPEE can possibly go just as long.
I love that you found a great shoe for your use case, but it does feel kinda weird to read that a carbon-plated racer with about 5-6 mm less stack front and back is "everything the Superblast 2 is only better." What I mean is, they are completely different shoes, but not that the Pro 4 isn't deserving of the praise in its own category.
@@persistentconsistency i agree. It's not a traditional comparison, but I should have been more specific that I compared them really because both are classified as comfortable yet fast long-run shoes without being top-tier speed. I pronate in most shoes, and even though Superblast 2 is wide, I sink inward more in that shoe than the Pro 4. So, if I want to keep from injury, it's the Pro 4's. Comfort is great in both, but I work extra muscles in the Superblast 2 that I don't care to strengthen because I won't need them for race day. Have metatarsal issues too, and not having the plate causes more discomfort on long runs than with the Pro 4 plate. So again, I'm just comparing them on what is a comfortable yet fast long-run shoe, without getting into the league of an Alphafly, etc.
I have just over 84 milew in my pair of Superblast 2s. I never got a pair of the 1s, so I can't compare. The 2s have fast become my favorite do-it-all shoe. I've taken them for a 21 mile long run as well as speed work. About the only thing I try not to wear it for is easy runs as I feel it'd be hard to run slow/easy enough
Any run at or over 15 miles, with paces approaching marathon or half-marathon, THIS shoe is my go-to. I like it more than the first version mainly for the better outsole that doesn't collect rocks/pebbles (Unlike the first version); shame about the weight gain but it doesn't affect the purpose of the shoe. I don't really use it as a daily for anything less than 10 miles, but long runs WITH embedded workouts/paces, yes, perfect. Well past 100 miles and almost no outsole wear, feels great, comfortable, stable. Also a great shoe for bigger runners because of the longevity and firm resilience of the foam. DO IT.
Interesting. I felt like this was a less aggressive and more approachable Superblast as compared to V1. I found it softer and prefer the V1 for more uptempo work. In fact, it's my track interval shoe (v1).
I'm about 180km into my pair of SB2. I found they took about 80km to either get used to or break-in, maybe a combo of both. I've been using them for long runs, which I often do on rolling hills and I find the heel quite clunky and awkward, I also have the Novablast 4 and I don't have the same issue on that same route. But the SB2 is soo comfortable for long runs, my feet feel fresh afterwards with no issues. I just wish the stack height was lower on shoes like this, I find on cambered roads and paths it really starts to fatigue the ankles quite quickly, I'm prone to medial tibial issues so that's always a factor for me.
Heavy runner here, 245lbs/112kg 6’6/1.95m tall I have 560km in my OG Superblast and 240km in the Superblast 2. Even at 560km gI find my OG pair to be faster and much more responsive that the 2s. While I do prefer the overall fit and upper of the 2s I believe the OGs are the best pair of running shoes I ever purchased. I have a wider forefoot and usually purchase 2E versions when available but I’ve been more than happy with the width of the v2 while being a bit too snug in the OGs. I needed about 30-40kms in the v1 to break them in however the 2s were perfect right out of the box. I feel like with the originals they made it too racy or performance focused and dialed it back a bit with the v2 so they wouldn’t compromise some race day sales 😅 The 2s now are my daily trainers and the OGs are my tempo/workout shoes!
I’ve got just over 200km in mine. I enjoy easy runs and tempo efforts. Oddly, I haven’t loved it for longer easy runs. After about 2 hours, my feet start to get grouchy - I think it’s the stiffness. This week I switched to my Cielo X1s for my long run and they were way better into that last 30 mins or so.
I'm struggling to enjoy mine. I bought into the hype and got myself a pair. I've got 30km on them so far and struggling to find a place in the rotation for them. My speed 3s are better for picking up the pace and my older SC trainer V2s are more comfy at the slower paces. I need to get these out on a decent long run to see how they perform.
I have these on order and have both the same previous shoes to you. How is the toe box compared to the sp3’s ? Hoping to finish my marathon training and do my race in them
@@jessiekruse7627 the SB2 is more roomy than the speed 3 in the toe box for me. I've done a long run in the SB2 now and can happily say they are a brilliant marathon training shoe, you need to go long in them to appreciate them.
Thanks for the video, it true that it feels a bit more firm, responsive and more stable that SB1 (over 350km) so I am not sure how they could be new side by side
210KM on my pair, and I have ZERO wear. I like the shoe best at HMP/MP pace, it seems a bit too clunky at 5k/10k, but most of us have different shoes for that purpose. I also don't wear the shoe for anything shorter than 25km, and like it best on days of 30+KM days with HMP/MP pace injections during the back half of a training block. If I was running a marathon or even a half marathon where I wanted to put in a good effort, but perhaps not pushing for a new PB...I'd wear this in a second with zero concerns. Great shoe!
Bummer about the tapered toe box. I have the original superblasts and it took some time for the pinky toe area to stretch out and feel good, but I use them for everything from strides to easy runs. It seems like many brands don't care about that outside of the foot taper at this time. I don't have a wide foot but my toes like to splay. Might look towards the On Cloud Eclipse or Cloud Monster 2 since those toeboxes seem to be more forgiving.
Hey I have the same situation as you. Bought the CloudEclipse and it works for me, but the CloudMonster 2 resembles the SB1 tightness - I tried it but returned it. I bought the Hyper and that was the most forgiving toebox space of all, give it a try! Also just bought the SB2 and the toebox is a better than SB1 because of the upper material, it’s more stretchy vs the previous one.
I ran 200 km in mine. The outsole is still in a lot better shape than what's shown in the video. So people who might be worrying about that, you shouldn't :)
I bought these to replace my Speed 3’s but not sure im going to get what I want out of them. Speed 4’s are way to narrow now so any suggestions? I ended up buying the Sc trainers v2 but never really enjoyed them.
Hey Matt, thank you for the video! Question, I'm a tall 211lb runner, used to do long runs in NB more v3 & v4. Compared to those will the SB2 feels like a a "brick"? Some never achieved a real break-in.... Thank you!!!
I'm digging the feel of the SB2 a lot and am 213 lb. Admittedly haven't gone longer than 5.5 miles in them yet, but plan to do a longer run later this week. They feel great and I really believe my weight helps bring out the compliance in them. I know almost everyone is enjoying them, but I probably wouldn't rock em if I was a much lighter runner. As a former college football player who's been 190+ since 12th grade, I feel like these were meant to be our quintessential daily trainers!
Toebox really the issue for me (was not a problem in last version) and I sent them back. If I went for the half size up, it would be too big. That is why I sent them back unfortunately
Just bought this shoe.. I live in an area where it rains quite often is it ok to wear this for treadmill running on a regular basis? Will doing so reduce the miles I get out of the shoe?
I'm enjoying Keyano 31 @ 326 lbs 11,000 steps walking daily. Do you think they'll come out every year? Maybe I'll be just light enough for your next model!
Find our full review of the Superblast 2 here: www.doctorsofrunning.com/2024/06/asics-superblast-2-review-2024.html
200 miles on my pair and I’m convinced it’s the best training shoe ever made.
Totally agree. Disadvantage: my other shoes are gathering dust
I just had my first run in this shoe yesterday.., and so far, I am happy.
I am 202 lbs, 91.6 kg, former rugby player, just for reference
I feel like those considered a bit heavier in the distance running world are getting a more compliant feel out of this shoe. I certainly am at 213 lb. Not sure I'd use it if I were, say, 150, unless I felt a bit of give. Seems like there are many firm and springy options with lower stack height and lower cost for lighter runners. I also think this one is more compliant than version 1, but I could be bugging.
I ran my first marathon in the original Superblast. I recently got the Superblast 2 and have worn them for a few 6-mile runs with strides. They feel good. I like the upper more. They seem to feel firmer down the middle of the foam, but I like the ride.
I wanted to love these shoes, but for me (an athletic small woman) it felt like bricks on my feet, especially compared to the mach6 and the speed 4.
I couldn’t run in them for more than 10km, because they gave me shin pain (had to rest for a day after each run). Sent them back and got the Mach X2 instead and I love them so far.
I have hit 300km in it this week and I love it. To me, it is a massive upgrade over the first version. More comfortable, better grip/durability, better fit and slightly softer feel. First shoe I bought a second pair of in advance (the sexy white colorway!)
It feels similar/identical like the first version
Yo same thing for me just got a second one white as well
@@Aron-t6m I have ran 500km in the first one and I like the SB2 more. Might be down to the better fit, but the midsole definitely feels better and less clunky at easier paces.
I have around 200 km in my superblast v1 and the midsole gets better and better the more i run. The superblast v2 after 10 km felt like a broken in v1, the traction is better and the upper is more comfortable: i find the fit more tuned in in the v2, the v1 was a bit too long in the same size. I too think that v2 will last less than v1 but i will run my october marathon in v2 because is more comfortable and i can't wait!
bought one in Taiwan, definitely the best running shoe I ever had
I wanted to love the superblast 2, but haven't felt the love that so many others have experienced. Recently put on 50 miles in the Saucony Pro 4, and I feel that could be called the Super-Dooper Blast, because it's everything the Superblast is only better. The Pro 4 is less aggressive than other Pro gen's, so it fits perfect as an everyday shoe but still is perfect as a race day shoe (if you had to pick 1 shoe).
I feel this is an interesting point, that ultimately actual super shoes may prove to be a fine long-term option for many. It's a controversial opinion right now due to the idea that running mechanics may be impacted to the point of causing injury, but I believe that mostly is the case when switching between them and conventional shoes as they can causes certain muscles in the foot to atrophy. I've seen a handful of older runners (70+) on reddit saying it's the only thing they can run in to prevent injuries.
I personally am going to test this theory for myself w/ a pair of Plaid 1.5 (Chinese super shoes) over the next several months. The only other dig is the cost/lifetime, but we've seen reports of things like AP3s lasting a good 500+ miles for many, and many of the more advanced Chinese brand shoes have rubber that goes 1000+ miles and more durable foams like TPEE can possibly go just as long.
I had pro 4. Fantastic shoe. Indeed. Just sb2 much more durable and stable. Pro 4 is most stable racing shoe. And comfortable.
I train in the Superblast and run marathons in the Endorphin Pro 4.
I love that you found a great shoe for your use case, but it does feel kinda weird to read that a carbon-plated racer with about 5-6 mm less stack front and back is "everything the Superblast 2 is only better." What I mean is, they are completely different shoes, but not that the Pro 4 isn't deserving of the praise in its own category.
@@persistentconsistency i agree. It's not a traditional comparison, but I should have been more specific that I compared them really because both are classified as comfortable yet fast long-run shoes without being top-tier speed. I pronate in most shoes, and even though Superblast 2 is wide, I sink inward more in that shoe than the Pro 4. So, if I want to keep from injury, it's the Pro 4's. Comfort is great in both, but I work extra muscles in the Superblast 2 that I don't care to strengthen because I won't need them for race day. Have metatarsal issues too, and not having the plate causes more discomfort on long runs than with the Pro 4 plate. So again, I'm just comparing them on what is a comfortable yet fast long-run shoe, without getting into the league of an Alphafly, etc.
I have just over 84 milew in my pair of Superblast 2s. I never got a pair of the 1s, so I can't compare. The 2s have fast become my favorite do-it-all shoe. I've taken them for a 21 mile long run as well as speed work. About the only thing I try not to wear it for is easy runs as I feel it'd be hard to run slow/easy enough
I feel you! I had to grab some Skyward X's to ensure I don't end up turning easy runs into tempos lol!
@@persistentconsistency , I usually grab the NB 1080 v13s. I haven't tried the Skyward Xs, and am not a big fan of Hoka shoes in general
Any run at or over 15 miles, with paces approaching marathon or half-marathon, THIS shoe is my go-to. I like it more than the first version mainly for the better outsole that doesn't collect rocks/pebbles (Unlike the first version); shame about the weight gain but it doesn't affect the purpose of the shoe. I don't really use it as a daily for anything less than 10 miles, but long runs WITH embedded workouts/paces, yes, perfect. Well past 100 miles and almost no outsole wear, feels great, comfortable, stable. Also a great shoe for bigger runners because of the longevity and firm resilience of the foam. DO IT.
Interesting. I felt like this was a less aggressive and more approachable Superblast as compared to V1. I found it softer and prefer the V1 for more uptempo work. In fact, it's my track interval shoe (v1).
I'm about 180km into my pair of SB2. I found they took about 80km to either get used to or break-in, maybe a combo of both. I've been using them for long runs, which I often do on rolling hills and I find the heel quite clunky and awkward, I also have the Novablast 4 and I don't have the same issue on that same route. But the SB2 is soo comfortable for long runs, my feet feel fresh afterwards with no issues. I just wish the stack height was lower on shoes like this, I find on cambered roads and paths it really starts to fatigue the ankles quite quickly, I'm prone to medial tibial issues so that's always a factor for me.
I finally just got mine last night! Can’t wait to run in them today!
Heavy runner here, 245lbs/112kg 6’6/1.95m tall
I have 560km in my OG Superblast and 240km in the Superblast 2. Even at 560km gI find my OG pair to be faster and much more responsive that the 2s. While I do prefer the overall fit and upper of the 2s I believe the OGs are the best pair of running shoes I ever purchased.
I have a wider forefoot and usually purchase 2E versions when available but I’ve been more than happy with the width of the v2 while being a bit too snug in the OGs.
I needed about 30-40kms in the v1 to break them in however the 2s were perfect right out of the box.
I feel like with the originals they made it too racy or performance focused and dialed it back a bit with the v2 so they wouldn’t compromise some race day sales 😅
The 2s now are my daily trainers and the OGs are my tempo/workout shoes!
105 kg, doing heavy lifting and hybrid stuff. Same here! 1 is noticably better than 2… way faster.
I’ve got just over 200km in mine. I enjoy easy runs and tempo efforts. Oddly, I haven’t loved it for longer easy runs. After about 2 hours, my feet start to get grouchy - I think it’s the stiffness. This week I switched to my Cielo X1s for my long run and they were way better into that last 30 mins or so.
I'm struggling to enjoy mine. I bought into the hype and got myself a pair. I've got 30km on them so far and struggling to find a place in the rotation for them. My speed 3s are better for picking up the pace and my older SC trainer V2s are more comfy at the slower paces. I need to get these out on a decent long run to see how they perform.
I have these on order and have both the same previous shoes to you. How is the toe box compared to the sp3’s ? Hoping to finish my marathon training and do my race in them
@@jessiekruse7627 the SB2 is more roomy than the speed 3 in the toe box for me.
I've done a long run in the SB2 now and can happily say they are a brilliant marathon training shoe, you need to go long in them to appreciate them.
The Saucony Hurricane 24 is my superblast 2 for now. Just ran a half Marathon for the first time for a training run yesterday 💪🏽.
Thanks for the video, it true that it feels a bit more firm, responsive and more stable that SB1 (over 350km) so I am not sure how they could be new side by side
I am still running with V1.
210KM on my pair, and I have ZERO wear. I like the shoe best at HMP/MP pace, it seems a bit too clunky at 5k/10k, but most of us have different shoes for that purpose. I also don't wear the shoe for anything shorter than 25km, and like it best on days of 30+KM days with HMP/MP pace injections during the back half of a training block. If I was running a marathon or even a half marathon where I wanted to put in a good effort, but perhaps not pushing for a new PB...I'd wear this in a second with zero concerns. Great shoe!
Thank god you run a shoe review site Matt. Ripping through $200+ shoes within 100 miles would be expensive as heck 😄
@@JTD33 I know…
Bummer about the tapered toe box. I have the original superblasts and it took some time for the pinky toe area to stretch out and feel good, but I use them for everything from strides to easy runs. It seems like many brands don't care about that outside of the foot taper at this time. I don't have a wide foot but my toes like to splay. Might look towards the On Cloud Eclipse or Cloud Monster 2 since those toeboxes seem to be more forgiving.
Hey I have the same situation as you. Bought the CloudEclipse and it works for me, but the CloudMonster 2 resembles the SB1 tightness - I tried it but returned it. I bought the Hyper and that was the most forgiving toebox space of all, give it a try! Also just bought the SB2 and the toebox is a better than SB1 because of the upper material, it’s more stretchy vs the previous one.
@@fecardona interesting, good to know. I'll check out the hyper, thanks.
I Stay with v1(50% off)!
I ran 200 km in mine. The outsole is still in a lot better shape than what's shown in the video. So people who might be worrying about that, you shouldn't :)
Too heavy for me so went with Noosa instead.
I bought these to replace my Speed 3’s but not sure im going to get what I want out of them. Speed 4’s are way to narrow now so any suggestions? I ended up buying the Sc trainers v2 but never really enjoyed them.
Hey Matt, thank you for the video!
Question, I'm a tall 211lb runner, used to do long runs in NB more v3 & v4. Compared to those will the SB2 feels like a a "brick"? Some never achieved a real break-in.... Thank you!!!
I'm digging the feel of the SB2 a lot and am 213 lb. Admittedly haven't gone longer than 5.5 miles in them yet, but plan to do a longer run later this week. They feel great and I really believe my weight helps bring out the compliance in them. I know almost everyone is enjoying them, but I probably wouldn't rock em if I was a much lighter runner. As a former college football player who's been 190+ since 12th grade, I feel like these were meant to be our quintessential daily trainers!
Man, why won't Asics offer this in a Wide fit???
I‘ve run 165 Miles in superblast 2 so far and the outsole looks much better than your pair Matt 😂.
Toebox really the issue for me (was not a problem in last version) and I sent them back. If I went for the half size up, it would be too big. That is why I sent them back unfortunately
Update: I bought half size up it is really good.
I wish it had better availability... Sold out in both colorways in my size EVERYWHERE! :(
they’re still selling it at asics website. Hurry!
I've done about 400 miles in mine and they still look like new. I'm not heavy so maybe that plays a big role
Is my choice to run NYC marathon
Only thing I would point out is that the outsole wear for 100 miles is absolutely terrible.
Too bad you can't find them anywhere - genius move by asics
how would you compare this shoe with brook hyperion max 2? and hoka mach x2? (i need to replace my mach x2, having worst heel blisters ever)
Any thoughts about the Adios Pro 4?
Sadly our pair was shipped to the wrong address. 😭
It’ll be a few.
Just bought this shoe.. I live in an area where it rains quite often is it ok to wear this for treadmill running on a regular basis? Will doing so reduce the miles I get out of the shoe?
would you run a marathon in the SB2??
It would be totally fine if you didn’t want a carbon plated racer.
Just bought my superblast2 and I am not even runner 😂
Is it good for a forefoot striker?
I'm a forefoot striker and it works great for me. As good as any low drop shoe I ever ran in.
100 Matt miles is like 400 regular miles 😅
Seems crazy. i thought it was 1000K
Man you destroy shoes
This or machx2
Mach X2 much more nimble and fun
Mach X2
Mach X2 caused major heel rubbing and a blister for me. No issues with the SB2.
@@jarededmiston6291
Have big heel slipping in SB1 and SB2, no in Mach X2
superblast are a good trainer but they are also overhyped and overrated .
I'm enjoying Keyano 31 @ 326 lbs 11,000 steps walking daily. Do you think they'll come out every year? Maybe I'll be just light enough for your next model!