The biggest difference between this and what Stanley Meyers did, is that he didn't use DC in order to separate the water. He used AC, at very high voltage and very low amperage which made his system very efficient. The AC was set to the right frequency to separate the water. This is why he stated that he could put any water into the tank and have it run, as there was no need for any additives. As for those who say that method is impossible, get a copy of Nikola Tesla's Colorado Diary and also a copy of The Problem of Increasing Human Energy, in there you'll find an experiment which Tesla did where he basically aggravated Nitrogen to a state where it was able to combust through a spark. He says that the explosion was about 50-70 feet in diameter. Not too bad for an inert gas. You can still attain most of Stanley Meyers patents online, as not only did he do the process of producing high amounts of hydrogen from any form of water, he also gave plans for hydrogen injectors with anti-drawback and a measure of other safety features to ensure that when doing the process, you don't end up making a massive explosion. The whole concept of what Stanley Meyers did came from the fact that his home town ran completely out of fuel and he wanted to make a way to which anyone who has a decent backyard machine shop would be able to convert their cars over to running on water. Remember that nothing is truly impossible, sometimes it's improbable and more often it's the definition of insanity where you try anything over and over again expecting different results. It's only when you do something different can the impossible seem plausible.
@@Ken-rk3by Why do you have to run DC? The principle stays the same, especially if your anode and cathode are the same material. I think. Drop an extension cord in a bucket. It makes bubbles. Though that might be from boiling which is different. Electronics guy needed in aisle 5. In general the output would be less because it's not using constant peak voltage. If the frequency makes up for that I don't know.
@@charlidog2 -- If you use AC current all the plates on both sides would be trying to form hydrogen and oxygen at the same time and apparently, it won't work. Besides, you would have to have an inverter to supply AC in a vehicle putting even more strain on the charging system than just running DC. The other problem would be keeping it cool, in essence, you just made a kettle. Also, the chances of arcing between the plates, if it did produce HHO gas it would make it too dangerous to be near it
Oil companies are not going to come after someone who built inefficient backyard AC inverter that runs on 12 volts, when you can buy much more efficient AC inverter that runs on 12 volts at Wal Mart.
Bro this why we’re scared to speak the truth cuz people like you keep this stupid paradigm that if we speak truth we automatically get killed🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️ bro u ain’t helping at all 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Great job. You just created a battery powered generator, using hydrogen as intermediary carrier. Would be way easier and more efficient to convert the 12vdc to 110vac with an inverter! This thing will only run as long as the battery is able to power the electrolysis.
@@faustojoselopez2656 Alternators are not that efficient. Even if we assumed the rest of the setup is (which it isn't). The alternator would take more power from the engine than it makes, so the battery will still run dead. These small engines usually don't have an alternator. They have a magnet on the flywheel that passes by a nearby coil to produce a small charge current, just enough to power the ignition and recharge what the starter took out of the battery. 2 Ampere max if I recall.
@@plonkster The energy is in the Hydrogen. This is not new. In the 70’s Meyer drove from LA to NY in a tank of water. He died soon after. It is a dangerous undertaking pardon the pun.
@@faustojoselopez2656 Actually no. The energy is not so much in the hydrogen as it is in the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. A certain amount of measurable energy is released when you let those two react. But in order to get the hydrogen, you need energy to split them. The process only works if you get more energy out than you put in... and that's the one thing that has not been shown, in fact it downright contradicts everything we know about physics. That doesn't mean it is wrong (well, it probably does, but I mean on a philosophical level it would not), it just means you need to prove your results very very meticulously. Even if there was no tomfoolery in this video -- which I doubt -- that engine is still not making enough electrical energy to recharge that small 18Ah battery. Which means the entire process essentially runs from the small 12V battery...
I ran my car for 10 years off a hydrogen generator in my engine. Gas milage was double, power up 10%, mechanic complained the engine was too clean to be old, everytime the engine ran it made its own gas up to 3 litres a minute. More gas, less fuel required and no emissions out the exhaust. It's better than electric because I still towed my 3T trailer around the country without fail.
@@asifyousfi2783 no, diesel still used combined with hydrogen. The difference is I got twice the milage out one tank of diesel with hydrogen fed in to the air intake from the hydro generator powered by the battery. Diesel waste non existent expelled out of the exhaust. The vehicle only used the diesel it needed. The engine ran much smoother as well like a petrol engine. Very clean combustion.
so, where can I get some of the critical components? I know Potassium Hydroxide has been used as an electrolyte, but I dont know if this one has been doped with anything special. Im looking to build my own for our 3 cars, If you have any pointers you are willing to give, I would appreciate it.
Beautiful! Totally legit, especially when in the final test the HH+ water tank doesn't loose liquid at all and stays full. What an efficiency! And the motor keeps producing the same power the whole time - in the beginning when is hit with so much initial hydrogen (and doesn't explode) and even later when just small bubbles are produced in the second tank, just amazing! There is no way a secret tank is mounted and if someone says otherwise screw him - haters gonna hate! This is not like the other video from this channel with the DVD solar panel with batteries in the support, no nothing like that! ...... But just to be sure I'll stick with the Stanley Meyers patents.
Impossible. Process when H atoms pulled out of H2O molecules, it changes water into gas. This technology will leave far future generations without water. Literally. This must be stopped.
All that means, is that the battery output (temporarily) is capable of supplying more gas than the engine needs. As the battery slowly depletes its charge (despite some charge from the engine's charger) the gas level will rise to liquid.
@@billkichman7770 yes if it took a gallon of gas to go 10 ft i suppose you could say the same thing for a gas engine. the efficiency is what is key here. We are using water to get (more miles per kw) in a sense which is why the water engine is becoming more practical.
I love these demonstrations, they show real proof of concept. I am an engineer and have been out of school for almost 40 years so my analytical prowess has been lost or forgotten. So one of you young engineers, or non-engineers, please follow this up with a complete mass and energy balance and set the boundaries of the analysis around all of the inputs and outputs of this system. Do the same for the system if it were run with water and gasoline and lets see where entropy takes us.
Stationary engines, no mass to move, just a small piston, look promising BUT the World longs for the ICE replacement. Thus the EV evolution. But we hav GAS Cars now, LPG & Hydrogen cars. So let's take a look. U bubble a little hydrogen thru a bank of 1, 2, 5L 'generators' feed thru a modified carby & off u go. So what's producing the energy to break down the water? Yep that's an embarrassing Q. Next let's look at a working existing H. car. Large tanks under enough pressure to turn H. into liquid and then run for about 1 std tank of petrol, say 500k. Typically 2 or 3 tanks. How much pressure? north of 500 atmospheres. So a bank of bubbling H. gas generators moves a 1 ton car, just like the commercial H. gas tanks. AND Big Auto has hidden, lied to, killed to stop these bubble makers going commercial in small to mid sized vehicles ?? Bless ur '24
@@davidsmith3736 Unfortunately depends on the math and physic. And both are non compromise. Output energy is input energy times efficiency. Nothing else. So easy it is.
Oh wow! HH+ is either so efficient at separating water that it breaks the first law of thermodynamics! That or its all powered by the battery in an incredibly inefficient way
@@friendless3768 He's being sarcastic. Of course it doesn't break the 1st law of thermodynamics it's just being very inefficient since he could just use the battery instead to power his angle grinder.
Yeah, they put together an arrangement with 2 things going at once, one adding to the system, one depleting, with a small difference being the loss in efficiency, that stretches the observed result out in time that it satisfies the con.
HHO fuel is not a new concept. Our chemistry teacher taught us this 50 years ago in junior high school. The problem is what to do about the eventual corrosion in existing internal combustion engines. Lead in gasoline was originally used to lubricate engine parts (especially the valves). An instructor 40 years ago told me this might be useful in the future when they can make pistons (combustion engines) out of ceramics (no corrosion issues). I still think Hydrogen Fuel Cell, direct to electricity is probably a better solution, but this is a nice video none the less. There really is no secret here. It just is not sustainable with current internal combustion engines that were designed for fossil fuels.
Yes, the corrosion looks like a potential problem in the long term. I think the problem here were the corks, but we should definitely look for ceramics.
Dear Guys, good show. Yes 50 years ago i also learnt the electrolysis of water. A massive bang in the science lab. Ok. You example is a 4 stroke petroleum engine. My question to you is. Would the HHO system work on a diesel engine that has been converted to natural gas.? Kind regards. Bill.
@@HiddentechnologyYT You should sell that device online!! Trades people would love it!! Some people would be able to use it for there cars!! You should sell a plan! A how to build one yourself guide!! Maybe even a kit with instructions/warnings. So people could buy the kit & build one themselves!! So even more people could afford to have this technology!! Thank you.
Keep up the good work guys! I have been saying for years that alternative energy sources are possible but are suppressed due to the greed in mens hearts. If I ever reproduce one of these amazing devices I will spread the knowledge underground for the good of all
Hey guys: remember. Hidden Technology didn't have depression, had no thoughts of contemplating suicide, had a great life/career, and is healthy in all aspects with great security.
More energy is required to separate the bond of hydrogen and oxygen than you can get out of it via combustion. Combustion has its own loses. If there is a working model of this, the catch will always be that the battery makes up the difference of the energy loss. Once the battery runs out, it will stall as the entire process is a max of 30% efficient.
Exactly. The efficiencies multiply, to total lower values. Maybe 0.85 for the generator x 0.3 for the dirty engine, x 0.9 battery charging, x whatever the hydrolysis is...very low number in the end.
Hey David, So can you explain to me what process you’d have to take to keep using the water, please? You sound like you know what your talking about and this video, although amazing, doesn’t explain what he is doing and what process he is taking to get energy output from simple H2O for people that don’t know what he is doing, like me lol. So would you have to run gas, charge the battery, then run water to save gas until the battery runs out, then run gas again? I am a super lay person in this regard. Could at the very least this process save you on gas or is using water to power a generator just wishful thinking? Also, why is that water turning red in that chamber? It was just water with like salt or something wasn’t it? In the left chamber.
From what I can tell, all water engines need a second input to work. Wether that be sodium, some type of chemical, heat, all that, anything that works doesn't use just water alone. A gas engine takes a small amount of electricity and then continues on by itself making up that loss of electricity. The challenge here is basicaly how to get a water engine that does the same. Now why we don't just have hydrogen based engines and facilities that make hydrogen and replace the gas at gas stations I have no idea. It would be the single most easy way to switch to a more renewable form of energy other than electric.
Don’t underestimate it so quickly, with time, this will possibly be one of the greatest inventions of mankind. So what if it’s only 30% efficiency, the first computers were the size of rooms, now they fit in your hand.
This is a really interesting video. I have watched it several times and cannot see the hidden petrol fuel pipe that feeds the engine. But we have only seen the generator from one side. That which I do see: if the bubbles in the right-hand tube each have a volume of about 1 cubic cm, 3 per second = 180cc of gas per minute. That means it is producing 1 litre of gas every five minutes. Given that the motor is around 200cc (probably more) then the engine can only do 1 RPM. It needs to about 1000x that figure to be real. So I take my hat off to Hidden Technology for a really well-made perpetual motion video that looks really convincing, if one does not question the numbers (or where that blooming fuel pipe is hidden).
Watch the video he puts the names of all the parts used and the tools used shouldn’t be very hard to identify. So far I’ve seen him use an angle grinder, a vise, and a drill press.
Hey, hijacking this comment so more people are aware. This channel promotes scams so be careful clicking any links on this channel! Also many of these comments are from bots. Thanks!
You still gotta come up with the energy to split the water molecule in the first place, so utilizing water as a "fuel" (sourcing H2 via electrolysis) is not any more of an efficient power source than the initial electricity required/used/needed to split the water in the first place (ie you have to use electricity to get H2O to separate it into its H2 & O2 parts; 100% of electrical energy in = ~80% the amount of oxidation/combustion energy out). Though imo H2 provides for an interesting excess energy storage idea. (storing excess as a gas vs traditional battery solutions), but water isn't really the fuel source here (it's H2). Splitting water up (electrolysis), and then putting it back together (oxidation of H2 gas), over and over again. 1. Electrolysis (splitting into parts): 2[H2O] = 2[H2] + 1[O2] 2. Combustion (putting back together): 2[H2] +1[O2] = 2[H2O] 3. Repeat.
That's my takeaway here as well. The engineering is impressive but the fuel source is the HH+ added in. Also, the longevity is questionable given the rods corroding at the start.
@@axel708 The resulting corroded sludge in the electrolysis chamber is very toxic. It produces hexavalent chromate, which must be disposed of at designated hazardous waste sites - there are severe penalites for not disposing of it properly. Not to mention it causes severe skin reactions, and evtually cancer. I do not think this is a good trade-off for petrol by any stretch.
@@DonoVideoProductions that could be reduced or even resolved by using higher grade SS such as 316 or 316L. He states in the video that the carbon oxidising was leading to the sludge you mentioned.
this actualy works in reallife too, the BIG problem is, that the hydrogen eats away the oilfilm in the pistons and that the engine cant run for a longer time in this conditions. ford actualy tested this for a long time, and they find it easyer to just use fuelcells.
Fascinating, Extremely well put together and defiantly worth doing at home - but I have some questions/concerns : 1- your cathode and anode are in a common container - meaning your gas is going to be be both oxygen and Hydrogen - the combustion of these gasses obviously work - but those two gasses have a MUCH different reaction then gasoline/atmosphere, and they generate MUCH higher heat/pressure. notably when using a spark ignition source. 2 - burning those two gasses produce water, over time, what would be the affect on the piston/engine block/gaskets. What happens to the lubrication/oil? You're directly introducing H20 into the cylinder, this will degrade the viscosity/cooling ability of the oil system. 3 - It would be interesting to see what modifying the variables ( Voltage, the electrolyte added to the water, and the mix of the ambient air/hydrogen/oxygen mix in the carburetor) would do to performance. 4 - you may consider a backflow/backfire valve in your next experiment, that gas mixture is very volatile Job well done - this is what RUclips should be.
as cool as it is. this is kinda dum. you need energy to create hydrolisis... so u have a battery, powering the electrolyzer.. that creates combustiable fuel.. which u then use in an engine to create more electricity..... u see where im going with this? hes turning less energy into more energy. thermodynamics says its impossible but ya know go off king ig.
@@error_-hw2fmyo se y afirmó que la energía infinita NO EXISTE pero es que estamos usando los elementos del agua como combustible y ambos sabemos que hidrógeno es altamente explosivo por así llamarlo es excelente para la combustión entonces tiene la capacidad de hacer un motor cuya energía mecánica hace girar un alternador que posiblemente genere más energía? Pregunto ya que no lo comprendo del todo
Interesting that the hydrogen production seems to have dropped to nearly nothing and yet the generator continues to run strongly. Also interesting that when a load is put on the generator you don’t hear the engine change under the load.
Well with a Octane rating of 140 or so. Those side tanks could be pressurized to the point of low bubblige. Also with the high octane rating, the genny wouldn't have to surge up much for the increased amperage's. Try running your car with 130-140+ octane fuel, I'll bet you get quite the HP boost. But the gen will not last long because of the higher engine temps....
Yeah, I suggest people compare the amount of gas produced at 18:10 and 25:40. That's a significant difference, yet the motor doesn't seem to notice. I'm pretty sure it should notice. I'd like to see a graph of the temp of the HHO generator over time. And the voltage of the battery over time. The skepticism I have is based on that dastardly Conservation of Energy Law. It takes a lot of energy to break the bonds of a water molecule. And there is an enormous amount of heat from the motor. That's all being converted from something, and I'm skeptical those tiny bubbles at 25:40 contain enough energy to satisfy the equation.
@@josephhoward2971 How would the HHO generator and bubbler pressurize? It isn't a closed system. There isn't a solenoid valve regulating fuel flow. There's only the carb's butterfly valve. Consider this, if what we just saw was possible, there would be HHO generators on every car. No, it's far more likely there's something we're not being shown going on here.
@@charlidog2 that is my question exactly. How much charge goes now to the battery. Wil it deplete or would the charge coil in the generator do a sufficient job keeping that battery up to charge. I wonder...
Hydrogen is the smallest element on the periodic table, and is nigh impossible to contain. I don't understand why so many people get all up in a bunch, interested in using hydrogen for engines. It isn't a fuel so much as it's a fuel can. And a leaky one at that.
@@billkichman7770 Maybe because we are burning all the petrol avaible in crappy "Wish" furniture and that we need to find alternative solutions. Hydrogen will never run out as you mentioned it is the simplest atom. and that running engines with a basic water electrolysis is so simple that just any college student could make it safely ?
@@billkichman7770 It's interesting because the raw materials for getting hydrogen are readily available, the methods are pretty straightforward and the oxidation products are harmless. We are having trouble storing excess electricity, so of course people look to water electrolysis. As you said, it also offers major complications, but you can't blame people for being interested. This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me.
@@gonzaloayalaibarre "This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me." When you don't have an electric engine available, this is a less efficient alternative I guess...
Though, the electrolysis separation of water into 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen has been known for many years, if not isolating the anode and cathode chambers, you are producing HHO gas, or Browns Gas, not just Hydrogen. Then the 'gurgle' tank prior to engine start only bubbled 3 or 4 bubbles, and the engine took off quickly like it was already primed. Another commenter properly indicated that the stock carburetor is designed for a liquid fuel to 'draw up' the fuel jet. There would need to be a modified intake to allow the HHO to flow into the Air-Fuel chamber, and hopefully under some level of pressure or it would be insufficient to give a rich enough atmosphere to ignite the engine. Good video, but need to validate there is not another fuel source on the generator, hidden behind the power plate. Camera angles prevent the specific view to witness carburetor setup. Also HH+ powder. More detail on they 'mystery' chemical. I doubt this is made by SikaFix and their HH+ product.
The HH+ was given to us by an anonymous subscriber. He claims to be patenting it after knowing about it. Don't know the backstory of it. We are just cautious to release too much information because so many people disappeared in the past.
@@HiddentechnologyYT "Many people disapeared..." just because of this we must give it to people. Secret is when "know it" less than two people. All other is "i just want money" or "i just make videos to earn money blah blah..." Big DISSLIKE for your video and channel. I go unsubscribe. Bye.
I guess for some generators there are LPG carburetors (not really carburetors anymore, more like there to regulate inflow) out there which should be possible to be used. What I am wondering about is more like: Under load the generator would take more Hydrogen than under little load: If always operated at high load, the engine would die eventually, not getting enough fuel (or getting lower Hz on the power output or "brown out" which could damage some electrical devices) or you would have too much fuel, pressure in the tank getting above safe levels and I do not want to be around when the brown gas accidentally ignites (I guess a safety valve which leads to a pipe immediate flaming off the excess fuel might actually work.But you really would need to make sure it is not back flaming)
Bruce HH O offers all that is needed for combustion, without aid of gasoline, engine vacuum is all that is needed along with spark to fire the HH O mixture, the throttle plate of the carburetor regulates the amount of mixture allowed in the generator, However the governor will not function; I have built HH O systems using solar panels and led acid batteries, modified DC current and electrolyte to aid voltage production at the plates of HH O generator, check valves to prevent backflow and explosion; Bottom line, The carburetor is basically bypassed and jets are no longer needed because HH O is already atomized and moved by engine vacuum.
Asking the same as a lot of other people. How long will the core last, and how long will it run on a single fill of water? I'd love to put this on a boat for overnighting and house power.
@@gohighhustle It doesnt work on the bases of physics alone. The energy required to for electrolysis is less than you would get from the hydrogen made, its a system that is always losing energy, and since the only energy input is the battery, its basically a joke of a video
Years ago, I added a similar generator to my van to allow the hydrogen to mix with gasoline. I did get a bit better mileage but the computer in the van read too rich mixture and sometimes I got way worse mileage. Then there was a problem with the oxygen sensors. Bottom line was I spent a lot of money on devices to override the computer. Should have bought an older carburetor type vehicle, but I'm just a simple guy testing things of interest. No money bags. Living in CA, you are required to get smog tested every two years. I was excited to show most exhaust was water vapor. Smog guy was going to have me sent to jail for modifying my exhaust system when he saw all the relays and other handy work I had done. He gave me a week to put everything back to factory specs or he was turning me in. Dollars down the drain. This stuff works but the oil police aren't going to allow it. Find an old copy of Nexus magazine 1990s that shows how a rich band person ran his older model Cadillac on just water. Never had enough money to duplicate. Men in Black (oil) men found out and threatened him and family if he went public, but he was able to show schematic of how to build and hook up. Move away from CA with their smog police. Fukushima happened when car manufacturer was going to produce water fueled cars and the meb caused under ocean explosion to wipe out facility and as threat to anyone else who might step on profits. Do it for yourself or go open source but if you try to go big........
the engine has to be designed from the crank up for hydrogen and it has to have some specialized kit to keep the oil from sludging out and killing the engine because the product of burning h2 is hi temp steam which happily infuses with oil under the operating temps and pressures but separates out in the oil pan as the engine cools that is the ultimate failure point for h2 engines not the fuel or less than ideal combustion process. that said there are far better engines to use for h2 as fuel people just assume that ice is the way to go and it is not
@@mouserr yet there are hundreds of vehicles running around with plug and play hho kits. Sure a motor built for hydrogen is best but if you have the proper kits you can get great results. Just do a simple search and look for vehicles with high mileage use. You will find them.
impressive video, professional machinery building, i have tried a HHO generator using koh and baking soda as catalysts that weren't efficient enough to run an engine solely but I had so much fun melting multiple materials such as glass metals etc.. by turning the generator into a torch, now as per the HH+ secret component that will make this happen (a catalyst that will increase the efficiency of the electrolysis that can be a game-changer) I would please ask for a sample to try it myself if possible or a video showing the generator running for a more extended period of time to prove that the energy is not withdrawn from the battery to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen (and indeed the water level should decrease since we are splitting it into HHO gas I suggest building a reservoir to maintain a steady stream of distilled water to refill the electrolysis tank is required unless you unscrew the filter container and refill it with water regularly)
The battery is providing the energy. It is not self sustaining. There is a huge energy loss in electrolysis, then also in the engine. So the energy source is the battery, not the water. It only gets a little energy back from the alternator. You're making a gas that is cheaper than gasoline vapour over maybe 10 years. But charging a battery from the wall and using an inverter is cheaper and more efficient and doesn't need a machine shop. So, really, after a certain amount of time, the battery would drain down to a point it is completely damaged, then the electrolysis would stop, then the engine would stop. But you showed you can run an engine off Brown's gas. The air intake is being used to reduce the concentration of the gas. At full load, this battery might last 10 minutes. Maybe an hour if you drain it down to 1V and don't mind buying batteries often. You could achieve the same by just taking off the spark plug and using the alternator as an inverter if you have an old or free generator laying around. Inverters are cheap. Very cheap. You could build one of those.
Working on cars isn't easy but do able. It'd definitely be a lengthy one. Considering your completely changing your combustion system from fossil to hydro wich both have different combustion systems internally in a vehicle. Idk enough to say what to change but you could keep your gas tank and just change the rest that lead up to the Injectors from what he's done. Complex but do-able
Seems like it could work but I see a few problems. How do you regulate the flow of hydrogen? Usually, gasoline will raise the carburetor float to stop fuel flow but with no gasoline flow, how does this happen? How do you keep the hydrogen from building too much pressure? what happens if the motor should backfire? a check valve may fix that problem but then hydrogen pressure will build. If you could install a pressure gauge with a sensor with a relay to shut off power to the hydrogen stimulator when the pressure hits a certain pressure and turn it back on when the pressure drops. How long would that little bit of water provide hydrogen? What about water vapor in the motor? would all the inner steel parts rust? seems like it would work if these problems were addressed
That's great. Years ago I made a hydrogen generator similarly which was to boost combustion of a gas or diesel engine. You have shown the water and electrolyte is enough to do the tick without gs or diesel. Fantastic work. Thank you from all of us inventive types.
Your device is splendid. In a Japanese company, I thought that it was Toushiba, but I distributed oxygen and hydrogen at the time of hydrogen generating and thought about a method to leave oxygen unattended in the air. Very safe. I am older age of Japan, but I make a team with the elderly person of the cause engineer and want to produce it for the world. I want to learn a detailed thing. I do not understand an electrolyte well, but the eldest son leaves the chemical course at a university. Also, my car uses gasoline to generate electricity, which is then used in the motor to run. Comfortable.
The problem with this demo is that current best processes for water electrolysis (PEM or alkaline electrolysis) has an effective electrical efficiency of about 60%. Looked at another way to produce 1 kg of hydrogen (which has a specific energy of 143 MJ/kg) requires 50-55 kWh (180-200 MJ) of electricity. Its true that 120 MJ/kg of 1 Kg of hydrogen is almost three times more energy dense than petrol. However, such a process uses 55 kWh to get an energy equivalent of just 33.6 kWh of energy. Then you take that hydrogen and use a conventional IC engine to generate power, which has a max efficiency of just 25%. So you start with say 55 kWh which then becomes 33.6 kWh and the ICE generator can only produce about 8 kWh of power at the end of the process. Not a great idea when the original 55 kWh of power which began the process was generated by the coal or natural gas powered grid which itself is only about 30% efficient. So the real "fuel to work" efficiency is about 6%. In other words you just wasted 94% of the energy in the original fuel. This clearly is not some super technology to get excited about?
I didn't realize hydrogen is that energy dense, what about using it with an electric motor? That's way higher efficiency than an internal combustion engine right?
@@hs3881 So, generate power - electrolysis to make hydrogen - reverse the process to release power - drive electric motor, is how that would work? If the power was all green, like from solar, arguably the efficiency of that step isn't what's important per se, but how clean/renewable it is. The idea would be hydrogen instead of a large battery pack. I've heard handling anoring hydrogen is challenging becaused st it leaks so easily, do you know if there's any truth to that?
"100% agree with you" said Stanley Meyer. Then he started his water-powered car and went to tour Angloamerica again. while seriously thinking about your words.
@@n8rson765It depends on how you define energy density. By mass energy density (J/kg) it is but not for volume energy density(J/gal) in room temperature.
Load testing the generator has no bearing on the functionality of the gas motor driving it. The question is “How long with that container of water continue to produce hydrogen?”
@@01saved load testing the generator absolutely has everything to do with this. The generator started as a 3kw generator on fossil fuels, wonder what it is able to produce on hydrogen?
I have one problem, the amount of energy required to produce hydrogen via electrolysis is more then the energy you get back from combusting the hydrogen. Is there some secret additive that I am missing to make the hydrogen production efficient?
Adam, what you said about the efficiency of the process is absolutely true! That is why this is NOT a Perpetual Motion Machine. Energy from OUTSIDE the generating system is constantly needed.....The Battery. Disconnect it and the system stops. Now if he charged the Battery from the generator........🤣😱🤣
@@winbobmarks8236 On point explanation. Of course solar energy can be used, but then the problem of solar dependency also comes to play, as well as low effieciency. Another thing that almost no one mentions, tho, is the fact that storing hydrogen is a problem in itself. High flamable/explosive, can escape cointainer due to metal absorbing/bubble forming, needs to be stored in high pressure due to it's low density. The risk are too high, and the fact that there are better options, like natural gas that can be made from organic matter. Of course, gas fuel in itself is more complicated than dealing with liquids.
@@captainpjarker what are you talking about? No reaction know or observed thus far in human history produces more energy than the initial input. That is how entropy and the flow of time works. We don't use wind turbines or coal energy because they reaction is efficient or geneates energy from nowhere, but because they are widely available and the extraction of said energy is simple. Which is not true to hydrogen: it don't exist in high quantities and at an affordable price, the storage process is difficult and it is highly flammable/explosive. Not to mention there are better gas options than hydrogen, like i said earlier, natural gas from organic matter or biodiesel, although they can't compete with petroleum due to cost and inefficiency.
@@TheCuteZombie Hydrogen is actually a lot cheaper, only problem is greed. No one has put money into a hydrogen system. hydrogen could be much more efficient and safer then any other fuel type. The only problem is that they would lose control over their money source. Once something big to refine hydrogen is made, it will try to be turned smaller due to hydrogen being one of the most abundant gases. Theres articles and studies done that proves hydrogen could be the future if we actually tried.
@@TheCuteZombie exactly. So why are you saying this is useless? Of COURSE there’s going to be energy loss. That’s not the point. You’re focusing on the negatives instead of the actual theory. Half the people in these comments don’t know what they’re talking about and the half that do want to act like a new fuel system is a negative? How? Also, did you really just say hydrogen isn’t readily abundant? You’re joking, right? It’s LITERALLY the most abundant element in the universe, so if THATS not abundant enough, neither is coal or oil or gas. It can’t compete with petroleum?? Bro please for both our sakes stop talking out of your ass 😂 have you seen gas prices lately? 7$ for a gallon of the stuff. 5$ for a pack of 24 water bottles is a pretty high estimate. Not to mention hydrogen burns more than 50% slower than gasoline (that means it’s more than double as efficient) so don’t tell me it “can’t compete”. You have no idea what you’re talking about lmfao. Probably the only reaosn hydrogen cars aren’t more popular is because base hydrogen gas is 4x as expensive as gasoline, but that’s buying the gas straight. If you buy purified water? Not even close to the same cost for 2x as much efficiency
Excellent, that's just what I need to keep my pet unicorn warm in winter. Will be a struggle to pay for gas this winter, at a time when there are no people venturing out to catch a glimpse of him.
You are not running HHO Gas only. In one of your liquids, you are running a carbon fuel with a little bit of oxyhydrogen mixture. The bubbles are very slow coming out of the bubbler. Prove me wrong I have 13 years of experience using oxyhydrogen. Open up each Container Unedited and take a match to the liquid before you run the machine. Nice trick. You are running carbon fuel vapors with a little bit of oxyhydrogen. You are either running sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide for your electrolyte in the water for electrolysis.
Wow. Is that what you are really concerned with, what the actual chemistry is? He is showing us that it is possible that we dont need gasoline for fuel.
@@johnnygonzalez9721 You need to ask him before turning on the machine to dip a piece of wood in the liquid and light it with a lighter before starting the engine. Once he can show there is no fuel in those cylinders then he is running 100% oxyhydrogen. The question is he said he did something to the engine. Why did he not explain what he did to the engine that he did not say in the video? Have you ever run an engine off of oxyhydrogen gas? I have run engines 100% off of oxyhydrogen stock engines with no changing of the timing. Visit my RUclips site and see what I have done with large Oxyhydrogen machines. Why does he not tell us what his electrolyte mixture is? I have a machine that makes 175 Liters per minute. What you see in his video is a small amount of Oxyhydrogen. How can he start up a machine right away before any amount of gas has accumulated to start from the beginning? Carbon fuel starts immediately oxyhydrogen has to make a certain amount before you have the engine respond to it.
Mechanic/technician with sense of humour 😊 Your kind of video editing is funny, creative n entertaint without lost technical detail of information, I like it 👍 Try to apply it for welding machine also, please
I have to say I am incredibly impressed by this video. The ability to hide the fuel line is very well done. Should really consider a career in movie special effects
Would be awesome to see a comparison of one of these running on gas only vs your hydrogen version (which is awesome btw) Questions that come to my mind: how long can each one run before refueling? assuming unlimited fuel, how long can each one run for before breaking? what kind of internal differences occur with the combustion components, any damage or internal / blowby issues? same oil cycle or any noticed differences there? running temp on the motor i would think would be less if anything, can definitely see a lot of positives with this solution beyond the obvious not burning fossil fuels. also is water produced and collected as a byproduct?
It's a fuel cell. I don't think the alternator is running to keep the battery charged. I don't think it could. Energy in has to equal energy out. The battery is draining while electrolysis is occurring. That's why there are two switches.
@@williamcouts7357 I have it in my mind if it can run a 3k W motor it can probably recharge the battery or atleast put some of it back into it so it doesn't discharge as quickly but maybe your right. In my mind it wouldn't break laws of physics since the engine brings in additional air into the combustion chamber (not burning all gases produced from electrolysis alone)
@@ioann235 Lol this has gotta be a troll. Seawater is among one of the most abundant resources we have and the water doesn't vanish from electrolysis, it is recombined through the combustion process
@@philuent Recombine from what if you burn the hydrogen using the oxygen...This is the reason hydrogen engines never got approval for use...not because of the oil companies😎
The gas level from the hydrogen tank did not decrease. Also, if oxygen is not separated, the resulting gas is dangerous in itself. And the whole system doesn't need a carburetor in this case.
@@janyjozsef I could see that the bubbles in the second water tank were often getting smaller and less frequent. That is proof of the reduction in gas production. The whole thing is pure hogwash!
Yeah I noticed the same thing Definitely look like there was not enough hydrogen produced to have that engine running But if it’s not smoke and mirrors well done
This water based portable generator set deserves to be commercialized ASAP in order to retire the carbon emmitting old gasoline based generators from the consumer electronics market.
Great minds think alike. I am presently working on a similar project. My generator doesn't have electric start so it will work somewhat differently. With measurements. Pressure, and volume of gas produced, amps and volts of electrolysis, and other details.
You are running a motor using OH which is produced by the energy of the same motor and also running other devices with it??!! well, you are creating energy my friend, congratulations!! Nobel Prize for you!
@@aryan1211_ yes, and how does a gasoline engine work with using only one small HHO bubble per second...... But I have to say that it was a nice mechanic job though
From what I saw you connected the hho output to the fuel line to carburetor. That CAN'T work. You would have to supply the hho directly into the air intake. Then you would have to add a way to regulate it. From the amount of bubbles it isn't producing enough to run engine either. Then if these things were corrected, it still will only run until the battery is depleted.
Ha ha ha - well done for spotting that. Plus the fact there was nearly no gas produced near the end and the motor obviously running at around 300 revs. Another click bait spam video exposed!
Things I would like to know: * Torque of the motor running on petrol vs hydrogen. * Amperage required for the electrolysis to create the hydrogen * Would a petrol/hydrogen hybrid work? (petrol with hydrogen boosted) * Type of water (distilled, sea water, drinking water etc) Great experiment :)
@@heinzpg It's not run by water. It's using electrolysis to seperate H2 and O. Then burning hydrogen. Rockets boosters are hydrogen. Have you tried reading? It's how you can get information.
@@Hunty49 I am quite aware that hydrogen obtained by electrolysis is seen here as possible fuel! But it is still outright impossible to run a car this way! Sorry, I feel it is you who needs additional informations and I can give them. Why can't you run a car this way? First of all, the production of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than the produced hydrogen can deliver. Second, the electrical energy for the electrolysis is supposed to be produced by a generator, driven by the hydrogen combustion motor. Both of them are not 100% efficient, this can't work out. In numbers: For one unit of electrical power you get perhaps 0.7 units of hydrogen power. The mechanical output of a hydrogen combustion engine with this hydrogen input power will be around 0.3 units. If you use this mechanical power to drive the generator you will get 0.25 units of electrical power, which can not substitute the 1.0 which are needed for the hydrogen production. And your car hasn't even moved, it only turned the generator ... They claim here they found "secret additives" to make electrolysis more efficient. I don't believe that crap, and efficiency can never be over 100% anyway. This video is a click bait, and it is not the first one of this sort.
I can't help but be doubtful. I've been following doomsday people and preppers and DIY project types for years (with a focus on people doing stuff cheaply and creatively because that's all that will be in my wheelhouse) and a semi-quick DIY build that basically replaces your gas bill with the price of water... This would be absolutely everywhere I've been looking for the past decade. It's too simple to do if people know it works so it would be in every other conversation in my group. Hell, nothing here is science that didn't exist during the great depression. Do you think those people wouldn't have figured out a way to diy a system like that to have f'ken power? Save money they needed to feed themselves and their children? Better their lives? And I don't believe for a second the answer to everything I'm saying is the "secret additive". A there's other stuff you can use to run that reaction and B even if you're using something subpar the answer to that is just building a bigger system. You don't think people would build a large ugly system if it meant using water to run their generators? If this genuinely worked the over a million community of people that love this stuff would've figured it out and blasted it to all their friends. It would be a staple of the community. The gas companies could keep it out of the news or off youtube or facebook, but this isn't a group of people that barely go outside and interact with other people. It's just not possible to hide that kind of secret imo. We're too connected and we're a demographic that likes to meet up in real life (Comparatively. I'm just trying to make the point this community doesn't live a hundred percent online where this kind of "news" could be suppressed) I hope this is useful to somebody out there who might be excited enough to drop a couple hundred dollars making their own. Wait on it and see if anybody credible comments on the video or if there's a wave of people making them successfully. Perpetual energy machines get millions of views and those are all shams. Like those, this doesn't pass the most basic common sense test.
Technology hides, forbids... Do you think that rockets into earth's orbit run on coal? How would the oil lobby make money if this were developed and put into wider use? Why didn't Tesla allow the development of free electricity? With small additions this works more efficiently with a high frequency generator.
Why would anyone need a video with a bunch of useless lies and misinformation in it? That's just not how our world works, nor from the physical perspective, neither from the common sense one. Perpetual motion engines are not only physically impossible, but also if there was any invention close to this, whole world would be already using them. Oil companies are not the ultimate power, like many conspirologists believe and car manufacturers would already be competing with each other for the most effective water engine.
This is what I saw. The volume of gas being produced steadily decreased from the first turn on indoors to end of the outdoor test. You did not mention what the state of charge was on the battery at the start and at the end therefore it is probable that the extra energy to produce the gas AND operate the power tools came from the starting battery thus decreasing the voltage which is why the gas production slowly went down. I'm not saying its impossible to do what you claimed, I'm saying I don't think YOU actually did it though. What is the electrolyte? How does it work to produce more gas energy than the amount of energy coming in from the generator. If you are claiming more than 100% efficiency then NO proof was offered. You would need to monitor the volume of gas production and its energy content and compare that to how much electrical energy was consumed by the electrolyzer and the tools. You need to account for all the energy coming and going, You did not do that.
Hydrogen has a kwh rating of 3 kwh per cubic meter, so about 0.003 kwh/liter, at ambient pressure, 1 litre of water will produce roughly 1240 litres of hydrogen. So for it to power that hand tool which is probably a couple hundred watts for a few seconds, then you likely aren't going to see much of a change.
@@PaulFrankAdams Aside from the fact that this youtuber is a deceiver already known for his videos capturing views to monetize, there is no engine with a gain equal to 1 of the kind. Also, anyone who were to invent a similar project, do you think they would reveal it to the whole world for free? He'd make a lot of money, wake up people!
The fact that this technology lives as an obscure video on the Internet while an engineered energy crisis is being carried out all the world tells you everything about the state of humanity.
Thank you for sharing this amazing video, hope other people watching this wonderful video will understand the knowledge this person is giving away for free.,...
@@ogi22 And nobody in their right mind doesn't realize the mass and generational child abuses damaging the majority. Let's talk about what's really going wrong and why before another innocent and helpless child's life is ruined, eh?
Remember the golden saying ( You are either part of the solution or part of the problem) . God has blessed you that you are an extraordinary person. And a blessing to humanity. I installed the same system on my vehicle and Chanelled the hydrogen gas into my intake manifold, and my gas mileage improved tremendously. This is the way of future. We pray soon .
Now I want to see one of the better known workshop RUclipsrs have a go at this, since the fab seems well documented enough. See what their findings are in comparison.
> well documented enough "Secret" ingredient. > See what their findings are in comparison. There's the rub. Would not withstand scientific scrutiny, i.e. repeatable and reproducible results.
Was really hoping to see it hooked up to the carb and how metering to the carb was done. Leaving out some of that makes me a bit doubtful even if I do believe in the possibility of the technology.
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
Being that H is a gas, much like propane, it is probably injected from a plate just behind the carb much like a propane conversion kit. Not much science behind it, hydrogen like propane is highly flammable and auto ignites fast hence the quick starts.
the basics were used in a toy .. back in the 70s .. its just been suppressed to the utmost by the power hungry elite .. why are we letting kids make rocket fuel? cant have that .. they might get too smart ... definitely a SHTF tech.. at this point.. i am only wondering the degradation of hydrolysis without HH+ which could be difficult to acquire .. unless one stocked up then i would like to know utilization rates etc..
Anyone who's built an HHO maker/ HHO torch, like this. Knows it takes a lot of power to produce the HHO gas.....I built a small HHO torch a few years back that ran wired directly to a 100W solar panel. I used an air pump needle used to fill up basketballs for the torch tip & the 100W solar panel was enough to give me a little pen flame. An engine will run off HHO but it takes a lot of electricity to create the HHO. It's more efficient just to use an electric motor/electric vehicle. The little 12V generator starting battery might have enough power to run the generator for a few seconds before it goes dead. But he didn't just build a "free power" runs on water device. If someone can figure out how to produce HHO gas from water by using a lot less electricity/power. That's actually what the "big breakthrough" be. Using electricity to break water down into hydrogen & oxygen gas has been known since the late 1800's. To save gasoline/get better MPGs, you could however. #1 build a solar battery bank (or buy a solar generator) #2 Build an HHO generator & run the HHO generator off the battery pack, that's recharged by solar or wall plug-in. Then use a combination of gasoline & HHO to power a vehicle. Say 60% gasoline mixed with 40% HHO gas. In an older lower compression engine & you might have to retard the engine timing & bit.
Only a little doubtful ? I would have to see a full technical spec and calculations to believe it. This is yet another version of a perpetual motion machine. Impossible.
It was my father who invented the engine in the 60s but certainly before. He sent his plans, I think, to the authorities at the time in France. After receiving a glowing response, he never heard from his discovery again!
Lol, my great grandpa, before he passed away says energy is actually free but is suppressed. He told us how to do it and had schematics as he was rocket engineer. He had a working hydrogen engine as well but a visit from the government stopped him in mass producing it. He was warned that if he continued, it would be his end. Maybe your grandpa and my great grandpa worked together lol
@@lolguy-x9n Oh he's dead sadly. But we still make and ride wood gas cars for the family. An car engine is basically just mini controlled explosions, you can make a simple engine if you know the basics and principle.
Each such demonstration its initial cost of production for the set up and its unit of production cost for certain type of application should be also given at least .
This is a great project. One thing to consider. I have a 10 year old TroyBilt 7kw electric start generator. It does NOT have on board charging of it's starter battery. It came with a 1.5 amp wall wart type charger that plugs into the end panel. I could use this project but I would have to wire in a higher current charger to drive the HHO unit and also keep the battery charged. This is not a problem and is cheap and simple to do. I might also have to scale up your plans as my generator / engine is more than twice as big as yours. Just a couple things for your viewers to think about with their units.
@@cdixitulu8751 My TroyBilt cost $700.00 U.S. 10 years ago. They may have been replaced by an "improved" model since then. If not, the price has surely gone up by now. An HHO fuel setup like the one in the video wouldn't be approved by U.S fire code without a proper regulator. In properly built natural gas / propane systems, there is a regulator that senses if the engine stalls. If this happens, the regulator shuts off the flow of gas so it doesn't build up into an explosion hazard. This couldn't be done in an HHO system because when the engine stalls, instead of the gas flow stopping, the HHO gas pressure would keep building until the pressure vessel either popped or the pressure got high enough to stop electrolysis. Rather than the safety regulator, one could connect a 120 / 240 volt relay coil to the AC output and the contacts connected to switch the DC current off when the AC voltage cuts out. To get the reaction started, one could connect a momentary push button switch across the relay contacts. To start for the first time, hold down the push button switch to get gas production started. after 30 seconds or so, crank the engine. Once running, the relay will close connecting the current to the HHO unit and sustain gas production. This will also serve to protect the battery from over discharge should an unattended generator quit running,
@@pedanticsmith5613 They already have internal combustion engines in cars that run well on hydrogen. The reason there aren't more of them is the problem of onboard storage for enough range and the lack of infrastructure to fuel them. This project and one other one that I saw working in a pickup truck are basically the same as commercially produced cars except instead of storing hydrogen, they produce it for use on the spot. It also has the added feature of producing the exact amount of oxygen for efficient combustion. If there was some way of recovering and reusing the water vapor from the exhaust, this would be the closest thing to perpetual motion as you could get. I'm NOT a believer in perpetual motion machines but hydrogen and oxygen, when burned together, are not destroyed. They are bonded together to form water. When you separate water into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis, you break that bond between the two gases. When you burn them together, you reestablish that bond and being that the 2 gases are the only constituents of the fuel, you can break and re--bond them to infinity where as with gasoline, it is a complex mix of chemicals that can't be reassembled once it is burned. The only thing that keeps this from being perpetual motion is the constant input of energy from the battery.
Thank you for your demonstration. However, you need to Load the Generator for longer periods of time to prove your having an ' Energy-efficient, or Net Gain ' from Hydrolysis. Not just depleted battery current.
Si el Generador eléctrico genera suficiente energía como para accionar la taladradora y la amoladora, también genera suficiente energía como para cargar la batería
Not only that he should used a dry cell instead. Wet cell are dangerous.... One little spark in that wet cell and BANG! SO YOU PEOPLE BE CAREFUL TRYING TO BUILD THIS. .
@@ComplexOne thats why he put in the flash chamber. It prevents back fire all the way back to the source and he filled it as high as possible to keep as little hydrogen stored in it.
What is even shown here? Even believing that a gasoline generator can run on hydrogen without further modification, you have to put in more energy for the electrolysis of water than you can get out by running the generator. Why use the generator at all?
Hey so I'm curious, How long do you think this Generator will run on the water you give it and how long would you say you can use it before you have to de-rust or replace the electrolysis core? I would love to Build one of these for long-term use, but would like to know what your opinion is on that and if you have any other suggestions or concerns for using it as a pretty continuous power source. I saw a place recently that converted a 650cc motorcycle to one of these, i would love to make a small car or something like a motorcycle at the least run like this.
He hasn't removed the possibility of this system running from battery power in such short tests. I'm not saying it is or isn't, just would be nice to see and know 7AF
@@tarheelcountry1868 Well i would love to try this and see how much power ya get for what it puts out with fuel, if i find a generator to use, i might run some long power tests and see what i get
You cannot ever get more power from converting hydrogen to water (burning it) than you can from turning water to hydrogen (in fact, you will generate significant loss). This video, however, is capable of generating money based on nothing but misdirection, so it’s a success in my book! I did notice that he removed the fuel tank so it’s not some kind of gas/hydrogen mix which-I dunno, could help a little I guess.
I don't know what adjustments you might make on a carburetor that shouldn't have any adjustments if it were strictly HHO. Also, there appears to only be a fraction of the gas going through your flash-back to run an engine of that size. Since we can't see the carburetor, and entire setup, I doubt it's legit.
You did a good job. But since the hydrogen molecule structure is very small, it will enter the aluminum inside the engine, and the engine will break down after a short time.
HEAD'S UP! GREAT WORK, HOWEVER.. output cannot be greater than input. You're getting a boost from a) a charged battery and maybe b) whatever secret formula in the hh mixture (?). I have made several hho generators and tested them for cutting torches and on vehicles to increase mpg. I found that it's definitely possible to make an engine run more efficiently. But output cannot be greater than input. Listen to what I'm saying. Yes it's possible to make a gasoline engine more efficient. But a HHO generator by itself cannot put out more than input. I can best explain that by comparing to a turbocharger on an engine. You can install a turbocharger on an engine and get more power but only because you're adding more AIR AND FUEL. So you're only able to get more power by increasing the amount of air and fuel. However, it is possible to increase the efficiency of an engine with a turbocharger. I believe this is because you're using waste energy (heat out of exhaust) to power turbine. In return you get better atomization of air going back to engine (through compressor). Regardless of increased efficiency, output will not be greater than input. In your example I believe your fully charged battery is working hard in the electrolysis process and cannot keep up. I don't know what other tricks are involved but that's my first guess
It creates a combustible fuel from the water, so output is greater than input. An engine I.C.E. uses no input energy, but it creates power internally that's what defines an engine compared to a Motor which uses external energy source as power input to create mechanical energy in power output, or pto.
Bro, they are not claiming this to be perpetual motion machine.. It's like saying that output can't be higher than input for gasoline. But yet you can light a single match and burn whole town with enough gasoline. It's the same with any other fuel. Here, fuel is Hydrogen. Only difference is that this engine works both as "generator-refinery" (wrong word, english is not my first language) where it's creating the fuel from water, and then using collected gas (H) to power the engine
You fail to grasp the concept of fuel combustion dynamics, combustible fuel contains the potential energy which has a range limit that exceeds any practical use to be a factor, hydrogen Hydrogen and oxygen have a higher volatility and produce more energy by volume than a 17-1 air fuel ratio of gasoline, at half of the air intake, the engine produces more power output, while water and oxygen are the emissions from combustion* (*as far as I'm aware)
You may be thinking of a hydrolytic power generator which does produce more output than input, one powers the entire grid in Homosassa State Park in Homosassa, FL. Don't take my word for it, Google that shit...
The power is coming from the battery. On starting the system you can see the gas bubbling up. This feeds the engine, but since the water to gas to water cycle isn't sustainable, it is just smoke and mirrors powered by the energy stored in the battery. Remember the electric start. Calcium carbide desolved in water will produce acetylene which can run the engine.
Yes, engines can run on hydrogen. Yes, you can split hydrogen out of water using electricity. Yes, you can run an electric generator(alternator) with an engine. All those do is CONVERT energy from one form to another. With losses each time it is converted, and as it is conveyed from one point to the next. None of this is new knowledge. None of this is considered "impossible" in modern times by anyone with any knowledge of science.
Why are we not running cars off water wasted water that we can filter back to clean water. They do it in space where they can clean their urine and drink , yes..so why doesn't someone make a idea and give the information out for free so that we people can do it to are cars world wide. People need to help each other out. Fuck corporate greed or wanting to make tons of money , let's brake these corporations down and bring them to their knees. We need to work together to make it better. If I was smart enough and new how to do it. I would make a device to sale at cost nothing more. But if I could make it in a video showing how to do it , then there has to be away for someone else to help somebody else out and make that one. Why don't we all invest are money into making somthing to work. I just know if I had an idea like that I would do it just to put them all out of business, that's worth more then money to me. That's a smile and laughter and it would bring joy to me that would love to watch these corporations fall to there knees flate on there face. If that got me killed so be it. At least I gave everyone the information for free and I got it out there.
> None of this is considered "impossible" in modern times by anyone with any knowledge of science. Except to those with the knowledge of conservation of energy, or the first law of thermodynamics ..
@@vtferrand4534 Nothing he is doing in this video is impossible. But none of it violates the laws of physics, none of it will ever result in net energy production, only the illusion of doing so to the naive
@@r6u356une56ney Bottom line: he's shilling an over unity device using a "secret ingredient". That, my friend, is indeed impossible. While the premise and individual components and methods may be plausible, the end result is not. I defy him to publish his findings and have them peer reviewed, and his findings duplicated. That is the heart of the scientific method, and only then will I be convinced.
Does anyone remember the David Mamet play, The Water Engine? (I think it was made into a TV episode in the '80's) In which a lone inventor successfully makes an engine that ran solely on water and attempts to get it patented but is intercepted by (as it turns out) Big Oil and he is quietly "disappeared" and the plans destroyed... Cautionary tale...
That's only partially true. It didn't run in water it ran on hydrogen. However, it did split water at the time of use. the system is a net loss and cannot run indefinitely on "water" as it takes more energy to split water than you get from burning it. I know this as I built one and installed it on my 2003 chevy trailblazer. I still had to use gasoline because the engine would use more hydrogen than the electrolyzer was able to make. no that's not because it was too small.
I have a question. From where the energy comes? Because you need electricity to make electrolysis. And the reaction hydrogen/oxygen gives you electricity. Less because there are losses. It seems to violate the 1st principle of thermodynamics. What I missed?
Very interesting. The hydrogen yield rate in the output filter is stronger on page 18:00 compare to page 23:00 seems not affecting engine power and rpm. The engine should stall or stop running by the lack of hydrogen by page 26:00.
Yes I noticed that, well commented. This needs done again in a much more scientifically monitored way. Even so, frankly I am sceptical nice try though. However, if genuine it would simply NOT be released by RUclips or any one else for that matter. Given past history would you??
@@ruriijassem7252 dico ma lo capite che senza carburatore non può funzionare deve dare la giusta miscela aria carburante in questo caso idrogeno ... Ma proprio non avete idea di quello che avete visto ...e inoltre continuo ad essere molto scettico!!!
Видел похожее много лет назад, только там ток подавался на электроды с модернизированного генератора на 30000V. И процесс разложения там был электрический и колба с водой светилась, очень ярко. Лучше водяного двигателя Виктора Шаубергера (из известных) пока ни кто ни чего не предложил. Там другой принцип, а из вращающихся материаллов только сама вода.
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
@@josidasilva5515 cavitation is used in another industrial secret to heat water at very low cost a device the size of a thermos flask could provide all the hot water you need for pennies a day
I really like the detail you put into building this however in order to completely convince me that this actually works I’m gonna need you to make another video running the hydrogen on the generator and then turning off the fuel supply first and not killing the power on the generator let it starve itself to a dead stop.
Right now the battery is fully charged when it dies how much hydrogen will it make? Is the generator over charging the battery? Do this with the battery unplugged.
@@byronaddison8184 On generators that can start with a electric starter the only purpose the battery serves is to engage the starter to start the generator. After that nothing happens with the battery it just sits there. The generator does NOT charge it use it or anything. This is why generator manufactures supply cheap battery "maintainers" aka low amp battery chargers with their product.
I don't know about the younger folks here, but in my 8th grade science class I learned how to separate hydrogen out of water with 2 'D' cell batteries. It didn't produce a lot of hydrogen but the hydrogen it did produce was ignited in the parking lot because it releases an incredible amount of energy when it burns - highly explosive. Hydrogen has it's own potential energy (.9 kilo-Joules per Mol). *The process of hydrolysis is NOT charging the hydrogen with energy,* it's just putting the hydrogen into a condition where it can release it's own energy.
Water has tighter molecule spacing than hydrogen, so you can store a lot of hydrogen in a smaller space using water. Water is much safer to store than liquid hydrogen, so the only reason we dont have this technology is because BIG OIL is shelving it. People have been murdered to keep electrolysis out of cars.
I noticed it too, especially at the beginning when angle grinder is several times turned on. start of motor can suck more than 50times of nominal current and voltage meter is calm.
Hydrogen can be produced from gasoline or diesel. Good idea. The efficiency is guaranteed not to exceed 10 percent. Magnificent energy slinger. 😢This means that you need 10 generators to run a single engine. If you produce hydrogen at this level of efficiency to power the engine, what is left? .....and then you still need energy for your flex machine? Keep dreaming... 😅I feel sorry for the people who recreate this and waste money and time. On the other hand, if they had paid attention in school...
Essentially, it is just ionised. you can get the same effect with just normal table salt. you just need something to get the electricity to flow through the water as water itself is a bad conductor.
Very cool. I'm sure in a SHTF situation that you could say, charge a device or power some lights etc. I'd rather have it for limited use than not have it at all. Nice job sir 👍
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each cylinder. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
Oh really so you've tried it? Yeah I've heard all that propaganda; who do you think started it shell or Exxon? Open your mind, I was building these things 30 years ago. Don't listen to what I say don't listen to what other people say the only person you can trust is yourself and if you don't build one or attempt to build one you will never know for sure........ OK maybe if your neighbor has one that works and you don't have to build it and you will then know for sure.
@@dodidee7727 all I can tell you for sure is what I know: The ones I messed with were used to power small engines that had governors that would keep them running at a constant speed by varying the throttle. In these cases the gas was fed through a tube into a hole that was drilled into the airbox with nothing regulating the gas flow, exactly the same as a do-it-yourself Mickey mouse Small engine propane conversion, but with the propane conversion you use a needle valve to adjust the gas flow and there is still a governor that keeps the engine at a certain RPM. Have I seen actual news reports on TV of cars running using a hydrogen generator: yes a scant few of them over the last 5 decades; but I never saw one on the road or in person. If you could work out how to make the thing not turn into the Hindenburg, be able to compress the gas and store it in a container that could withstand a crash and then be able to feed it into the intake manifold at a regulated rate such as with a propane vehicle to allow for smooth operation I could see it working. But any answer I gave you would just be a guess because I've never seen one work in person. I'm happy to see such an interest in this technology!
I'm wondering as to weather or not anybody else has thought about the possibility of fuel still being in the fuel bowl of the carburator? I would be much more into believing this worked if he had taken off the carburator and found a simple way to meter the hydrogen/oxygen gas.
Yes I also wonder about gas flow into the carb through neadle valve. Sounds like moter only runs at one speed so not need to worry about having a change of gas flow. Carb might have a hole vented to air from float. Might make it dangerous if not vented to carb side of aircleaner filter. The carb float and needle valve might as well be taken out. As will not work anymore. I would put a wire mesh inside the carb too to stop a flame or outside spark from ignite the gas in the carb. Like they did with the old miners hats.
@@gtir300hp Well I'm contemplating actual gasoline still being in the carburator bowl to run the engine, idle might just be set high, but if the engine is being ran by the HHO gas it's most likely less power out than in or that is already there. A lead acid appearing battery is visible on the generator for electric start. (I imagine the engineer charges it while running) IF it's running on that little amount of HHO gas.
@@gtir300hp No the gas isn't flowing through the needle valves but is instead flowing through the butterfly valve into the cylinders. The needle valves are redundant in the design ... .. ..
He is using small loads, if he would load it to 80% then that would be a test plug in a refrigerator and lights for one load than a resistance infrared heater and you will see how efficient, and if he had gas in the bowl it would last about 2-1/2 minutes and stalled.
best way is to open source the tech, elites and oil companies, have killed people where it would hurt their finances. the more people have this tech the better it gets, just like Linux.
@@asandax6 Even though this is crude and basic, there is still a saving especially with the fuel prices today. Of course you'll have to put into account things like amount of time usage, as that battery will eventually run out at the draw required to run the system. You'll probably find that the battery won't last as long as the water. So to run it longer, more/bigger batteries.
Thanks for showing us. Now we can become truly free independent people. We make our own electricity for light and heat and fuel and can also grow our own food, including green fodder, fish and rabbits. We can create our private workshop and iron foundry, etc., etc.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Roc Steady (feat. Flo Milli) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HozPPyqW0dY/mqdefault.jpg)
The biggest difference between this and what Stanley Meyers did, is that he didn't use DC in order to separate the water. He used AC, at very high voltage and very low amperage which made his system very efficient. The AC was set to the right frequency to separate the water. This is why he stated that he could put any water into the tank and have it run, as there was no need for any additives.
As for those who say that method is impossible, get a copy of Nikola Tesla's Colorado Diary and also a copy of The Problem of Increasing Human Energy, in there you'll find an experiment which Tesla did where he basically aggravated Nitrogen to a state where it was able to combust through a spark. He says that the explosion was about 50-70 feet in diameter. Not too bad for an inert gas.
You can still attain most of Stanley Meyers patents online, as not only did he do the process of producing high amounts of hydrogen from any form of water, he also gave plans for hydrogen injectors with anti-drawback and a measure of other safety features to ensure that when doing the process, you don't end up making a massive explosion.
The whole concept of what Stanley Meyers did came from the fact that his home town ran completely out of fuel and he wanted to make a way to which anyone who has a decent backyard machine shop would be able to convert their cars over to running on water.
Remember that nothing is truly impossible, sometimes it's improbable and more often it's the definition of insanity where you try anything over and over again expecting different results. It's only when you do something different can the impossible seem plausible.
OKAY, you know so much about how Stanley did it, build one.
Uhh..WRONG. He used a pulsed DC….His way was with resonance. Stick your hand INTO Meyers demo units and you would die if it was not pulsed DC.
@@johnhamilton9098 So who are you sending your comments to, me or Klay because I know that you have to run DC through the HHO.??
@@Ken-rk3by Why do you have to run DC? The principle stays the same, especially if your anode and cathode are the same material. I think.
Drop an extension cord in a bucket. It makes bubbles. Though that might be from boiling which is different. Electronics guy needed in aisle 5.
In general the output would be less because it's not using constant peak voltage. If the frequency makes up for that I don't know.
@@charlidog2 -- If you use AC current all the plates on both sides would be trying to form hydrogen and oxygen at the same time and apparently, it won't work. Besides, you would have to have an inverter to supply AC in a vehicle putting even more strain on the charging system than just running DC. The other problem would be keeping it cool, in essence, you just made a kettle. Also, the chances of arcing between the plates, if it did produce HHO gas it would make it too dangerous to be near it
Welp, goodbye. We all greatly appreciate your sacrifice
Oil companies are not going to come after someone who built inefficient backyard AC inverter that runs on 12 volts, when you can buy much more efficient AC inverter that runs on 12 volts at Wal Mart.
@@Hapasan808 Wow, are indefinite articles not a thing for you?
@@Hapasan808 You know what happened to the last guy who built a water car?
Bro this why we’re scared to speak the truth cuz people like you keep this stupid paradigm that if we speak truth we automatically get killed🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️ bro u ain’t helping at all 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
@@soeren8652 I know still people who builds them and are alive. If they come in a news, they will get fkd :D
Great job. You just created a battery powered generator, using hydrogen as intermediary carrier. Would be way easier and more efficient to convert the 12vdc to 110vac with an inverter! This thing will only run as long as the battery is able to power the electrolysis.
How about charging the battery with an alternator.??
@@faustojoselopez2656 uhmmmm did you just discover free energy before everyone else?
@@faustojoselopez2656 Alternators are not that efficient. Even if we assumed the rest of the setup is (which it isn't). The alternator would take more power from the engine than it makes, so the battery will still run dead. These small engines usually don't have an alternator. They have a magnet on the flywheel that passes by a nearby coil to produce a small charge current, just enough to power the ignition and recharge what the starter took out of the battery. 2 Ampere max if I recall.
@@plonkster The energy is in the Hydrogen. This is not new. In the 70’s Meyer drove from LA to NY in a tank of water. He died soon after. It is a dangerous undertaking pardon the pun.
@@faustojoselopez2656 Actually no. The energy is not so much in the hydrogen as it is in the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. A certain amount of measurable energy is released when you let those two react. But in order to get the hydrogen, you need energy to split them. The process only works if you get more energy out than you put in... and that's the one thing that has not been shown, in fact it downright contradicts everything we know about physics.
That doesn't mean it is wrong (well, it probably does, but I mean on a philosophical level it would not), it just means you need to prove your results very very meticulously.
Even if there was no tomfoolery in this video -- which I doubt -- that engine is still not making enough electrical energy to recharge that small 18Ah battery. Which means the entire process essentially runs from the small 12V battery...
This is awesome, please do an update on maintenance. Like when to change the water, or when to change the stainless steel
I ran my car for 10 years off a hydrogen generator in my engine. Gas milage was double, power up 10%, mechanic complained the engine was too clean to be old, everytime the engine ran it made its own gas up to 3 litres a minute. More gas, less fuel required and no emissions out the exhaust. It's better than electric because I still towed my 3T trailer around the country without fail.
Awesome! Congratulations for reaching that goal!
@@asifyousfi2783 no, diesel still used combined with hydrogen. The difference is I got twice the milage out one tank of diesel with hydrogen fed in to the air intake from the hydro generator powered by the battery. Diesel waste non existent expelled out of the exhaust. The vehicle only used the diesel it needed. The engine ran much smoother as well like a petrol engine. Very clean combustion.
so, where can I get some of the critical components? I know Potassium Hydroxide has been used as an electrolyte, but I dont know if this one has been doped with anything special. Im looking to build my own for our 3 cars, If you have any pointers you are willing to give, I would appreciate it.
@@samjohnson3124 hardware store has it all, or buy a ready made kit. USA have them ready plug and play for around $400
@@samjohnson3124 the parts in this video is available off the shelf in a hardware store.
Beautiful! Totally legit, especially when in the final test the HH+ water tank doesn't loose liquid at all and stays full. What an efficiency! And the motor keeps producing the same power the whole time - in the beginning when is hit with so much initial hydrogen (and doesn't explode) and even later when just small bubbles are produced in the second tank, just amazing! There is no way a secret tank is mounted and if someone says otherwise screw him - haters gonna hate! This is not like the other video from this channel with the DVD solar panel with batteries in the support, no nothing like that! ...... But just to be sure I'll stick with the Stanley Meyers patents.
Impossible.
Process when H atoms pulled out of H2O molecules, it changes water into gas.
This technology will leave far future generations without water.
Literally.
This must be stopped.
Nice
I need one
All that means, is that the battery output (temporarily) is capable of supplying more gas than the engine needs. As the battery slowly depletes its charge (despite some charge from the engine's charger) the gas level will rise to liquid.
Yeah. Doesn't even consume water. It runs on the energy of hopes and dreams! =)
@@billkichman7770 yes if it took a gallon of gas to go 10 ft i suppose you could say the same thing for a gas engine. the efficiency is what is key here. We are using water to get (more miles per kw) in a sense which is why the water engine is becoming more practical.
Daily Dose of Internet sent me
Also me
Same here
Same
yes
me
I love these demonstrations, they show real proof of concept. I am an engineer and have been out of school for almost 40 years so my analytical prowess has been lost or forgotten. So one of you young engineers, or non-engineers, please follow this up with a complete mass and energy balance and set the boundaries of the analysis around all of the inputs and outputs of this system. Do the same for the system if it were run with water and gasoline and lets see where entropy takes us.
Depends on the engine.
Stationary engines, no mass to move, just a small piston, look promising BUT the World longs for the ICE replacement. Thus the EV evolution. But we hav GAS Cars now, LPG & Hydrogen cars. So let's take a look. U bubble a little hydrogen thru a bank of 1, 2, 5L 'generators' feed thru a modified carby & off u go. So what's producing the energy to break down the water? Yep that's an embarrassing Q. Next let's look at a working existing H. car. Large tanks under enough pressure to turn H. into liquid and then run for about 1 std tank of petrol, say 500k. Typically 2 or 3 tanks. How much pressure? north of 500 atmospheres. So a bank of bubbling H. gas generators moves a 1 ton car, just like the commercial H. gas tanks. AND Big Auto has hidden, lied to, killed to stop these bubble makers going commercial in small to mid sized vehicles ?? Bless ur '24
I am sure, they just use Wodka or something else that looks like Water.
@@davidsmith3736 Unfortunately depends on the math and physic. And both are non compromise. Output energy is input energy times efficiency. Nothing else. So easy it is.
Oh wow! HH+ is either so efficient at separating water that it breaks the first law of thermodynamics! That or its all powered by the battery in an incredibly inefficient way
I have not studied this and have no experience in it I am just wondering how it breaks this rule?
Thanks
I agree with the comment above and am wondering how it breaks the rules
@@friendless3768 He's being sarcastic. Of course it doesn't break the 1st law of thermodynamics it's just being very inefficient since he could just use the battery instead to power his angle grinder.
@@friendless3768 It takes more energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen than you get back by burning the hydrogen.
Yeah, they put together an arrangement with 2 things going at once, one adding to the system, one depleting, with a small difference being the loss in efficiency, that stretches the observed result out in time that it satisfies the con.
HHO fuel is not a new concept. Our chemistry teacher taught us this 50 years ago in junior high school. The problem is what to do about the eventual corrosion in existing internal combustion engines. Lead in gasoline was originally used to lubricate engine parts (especially the valves). An instructor 40 years ago told me this might be useful in the future when they can make pistons (combustion engines) out of ceramics (no corrosion issues). I still think Hydrogen Fuel Cell, direct to electricity is probably a better solution, but this is a nice video none the less. There really is no secret here. It just is not sustainable with current internal combustion engines that were designed for fossil fuels.
Yes, the corrosion looks like a potential problem in the long term. I think the problem here were the corks, but we should definitely look for ceramics.
Dear Guys, good show.
Yes 50 years ago i also learnt the electrolysis of water. A massive bang in the science lab.
Ok.
You example is a 4 stroke petroleum engine.
My question to you is.
Would the HHO system work on a diesel engine that has been converted to natural gas.?
Kind regards.
Bill.
lpg, is the go.. my bronco been on lpg for 14 yrs. 12.1 compression, timing, goes like a cut cat..
@@HiddentechnologyYT You should sell that device online!! Trades people would love it!! Some people would be able to use it for there cars!!
You should sell a plan! A how to build one yourself guide!!
Maybe even a kit with instructions/warnings. So people could buy the kit & build one themselves!!
So even more people could afford to have this technology!! Thank you.
@@zachsheffee8458 absolutely right
Well it was nice that he shared this with the world. He'll be missed RIP.
His head in 24 hours 🤯
yeh i found a story about a guy created a waterpowered car and was killed
2.2 milion people gonna die
@@p.p.a.p762 exactly!
Download the video so there is still evidence left
Keep up the good work guys! I have been saying for years that alternative energy sources are possible but are suppressed due to the greed in mens hearts. If I ever reproduce one of these amazing devices I will spread the knowledge underground for the good of all
female talking about technology xd
You could also make a lot of money from it
Hey guys: remember. Hidden Technology didn't have depression, had no thoughts of contemplating suicide, had a great life/career, and is healthy in all aspects with great security.
ok, and?
@@gugomajo4161 Just so that he doesn't mysteriously disappear because of him making an actual way to be powered by water. Just look at Stanley Meyer.
Stay Halal brother 🙏
I’ve ran my body on water and variations of water based liquids for 38 years. Works great!
And we provide free gas after eating beans!
Mine is however sometimes demands a lot of alcohol with water😭😭😭😭
I failed the emissions test!
Nothing like snorting coke to get me going
helps with the combination @@vivekawasthi4808
More energy is required to separate the bond of hydrogen and oxygen than you can get out of it via combustion. Combustion has its own loses. If there is a working model of this, the catch will always be that the battery makes up the difference of the energy loss. Once the battery runs out, it will stall as the entire process is a max of 30% efficient.
Exactly. The efficiencies multiply, to total lower values. Maybe 0.85 for the generator x 0.3 for the dirty engine, x 0.9 battery charging, x whatever the hydrolysis is...very low number in the end.
Hey David, So can you explain to me what process you’d have to take to keep using the water, please? You sound like you know what your talking about and this video, although amazing, doesn’t explain what he is doing and what process he is taking to get energy output from simple H2O for people that don’t know what he is doing, like me lol. So would you have to run gas, charge the battery, then run water to save gas until the battery runs out, then run gas again? I am a super lay person in this regard. Could at the very least this process save you on gas or is using water to power a generator just wishful thinking? Also, why is that water turning red in that chamber? It was just water with like salt or something wasn’t it? In the left chamber.
Instead of electrolysis, use ionization PWM with water spray (car ignition with PWM on the 12 VDC side and water through a carburator). 10kV, 3 kHz.
From what I can tell, all water engines need a second input to work. Wether that be sodium, some type of chemical, heat, all that, anything that works doesn't use just water alone. A gas engine takes a small amount of electricity and then continues on by itself making up that loss of electricity. The challenge here is basicaly how to get a water engine that does the same. Now why we don't just have hydrogen based engines and facilities that make hydrogen and replace the gas at gas stations I have no idea. It would be the single most easy way to switch to a more renewable form of energy other than electric.
Don’t underestimate it so quickly, with time, this will possibly be one of the greatest inventions of mankind. So what if it’s only 30% efficiency, the first computers were the size of rooms, now they fit in your hand.
This is a really interesting video. I have watched it several times and cannot see the hidden petrol fuel pipe that feeds the engine. But we have only seen the generator from one side.
That which I do see: if the bubbles in the right-hand tube each have a volume of about 1 cubic cm, 3 per second = 180cc of gas per minute. That means it is producing 1 litre of gas every five minutes. Given that the motor is around 200cc (probably more) then the engine can only do 1 RPM. It needs to about 1000x that figure to be real.
So I take my hat off to Hidden Technology for a really well-made perpetual motion video that looks really convincing, if one does not question the numbers (or where that blooming fuel pipe is hidden).
I would be glad to have a list with all tools, parts and others to complete this amazing project.
Yeah! how can we get this list?
same here, i want the list of the items too... maybe i can find a way to make it more effective
Watch the video he puts the names of all the parts used and the tools used shouldn’t be very hard to identify. So far I’ve seen him use an angle grinder, a vise, and a drill press.
don't forget the batterie :)
Hey, hijacking this comment so more people are aware. This channel promotes scams so be careful clicking any links on this channel! Also many of these comments are from bots. Thanks!
You still gotta come up with the energy to split the water molecule in the first place, so utilizing water as a "fuel" (sourcing H2 via electrolysis) is not any more of an efficient power source than the initial electricity required/used/needed to split the water in the first place (ie you have to use electricity to get H2O to separate it into its H2 & O2 parts; 100% of electrical energy in = ~80% the amount of oxidation/combustion energy out).
Though imo H2 provides for an interesting excess energy storage idea. (storing excess as a gas vs traditional battery solutions), but water isn't really the fuel source here (it's H2).
Splitting water up (electrolysis), and then putting it back together (oxidation of H2 gas), over and over again.
1. Electrolysis (splitting into parts):
2[H2O] = 2[H2] + 1[O2]
2. Combustion (putting back together):
2[H2] +1[O2] = 2[H2O]
3. Repeat.
That's my takeaway here as well. The engineering is impressive but the fuel source is the HH+ added in. Also, the longevity is questionable given the rods corroding at the start.
@@axel708 The resulting corroded sludge in the electrolysis chamber is very toxic. It produces hexavalent chromate, which must be disposed of at designated hazardous waste sites - there are severe penalites for not disposing of it properly. Not to mention it causes severe skin reactions, and evtually cancer.
I do not think this is a good trade-off for petrol by any stretch.
@@DonoVideoProductions can you expand on this whole sludge please?, in realetion on how much worse than CO2?
@@DonoVideoProductions that could be reduced or even resolved by using higher grade SS such as 316 or 316L. He states in the video that the carbon oxidising was leading to the sludge you mentioned.
Yes, but it's still an alternative to fossil fuels, isn't that what matters the most?
File this one with all the other perpetual motion devices on RUclips (which I've never seen commercially).
this actualy works in reallife too, the BIG problem is, that the hydrogen eats away the oilfilm in the pistons and that the engine cant run for a longer time in this conditions. ford actualy tested this for a long time, and they find it easyer to just use fuelcells.
Hydrolisis increases entropy, so this isnt a perpetual motionmachine
Fascinating, Extremely well put together and defiantly worth doing at home - but I have some questions/concerns :
1- your cathode and anode are in a common container - meaning your gas is going to be be both oxygen and Hydrogen - the combustion of these gasses obviously work - but those two gasses have a MUCH different reaction then gasoline/atmosphere, and they generate MUCH higher heat/pressure. notably when using a spark ignition source.
2 - burning those two gasses produce water, over time, what would be the affect on the piston/engine block/gaskets. What happens to the lubrication/oil? You're directly introducing H20 into the cylinder, this will degrade the viscosity/cooling ability of the oil system.
3 - It would be interesting to see what modifying the variables ( Voltage, the electrolyte added to the water, and the mix of the ambient air/hydrogen/oxygen mix in the carburetor) would do to performance.
4 - you may consider a backflow/backfire valve in your next experiment, that gas mixture is very volatile
Job well done - this is what RUclips should be.
as cool as it is. this is kinda dum. you need energy to create hydrolisis... so u have a battery, powering the electrolyzer.. that creates combustiable fuel.. which u then use in an engine to create more electricity..... u see where im going with this? hes turning less energy into more energy. thermodynamics says its impossible but ya know go off king ig.
@@error_-hw2fmyo se y afirmó que la energía infinita NO EXISTE pero es que estamos usando los elementos del agua como combustible y ambos sabemos que hidrógeno es altamente explosivo por así llamarlo es excelente para la combustión entonces tiene la capacidad de hacer un motor cuya energía mecánica hace girar un alternador que posiblemente genere más energía? Pregunto ya que no lo comprendo del todo
Interesting that the hydrogen production seems to have dropped to nearly nothing and yet the generator continues to run strongly. Also interesting that when a load is put on the generator you don’t hear the engine change under the load.
Well with a Octane rating of 140 or so. Those side tanks could be pressurized to the point of low bubblige. Also with the high octane rating, the genny wouldn't have to surge up much for the increased amperage's. Try running your car with 130-140+ octane fuel, I'll bet you get quite the HP boost. But the gen will not last long because of the higher engine temps....
Yeah, I suggest people compare the amount of gas produced at 18:10 and 25:40. That's a significant difference, yet the motor doesn't seem to notice. I'm pretty sure it should notice.
I'd like to see a graph of the temp of the HHO generator over time. And the voltage of the battery over time.
The skepticism I have is based on that dastardly Conservation of Energy Law. It takes a lot of energy to break the bonds of a water molecule. And there is an enormous amount of heat from the motor. That's all being converted from something, and I'm skeptical those tiny bubbles at 25:40 contain enough energy to satisfy the equation.
@@josephhoward2971 How would the HHO generator and bubbler pressurize? It isn't a closed system. There isn't a solenoid valve regulating fuel flow. There's only the carb's butterfly valve.
Consider this, if what we just saw was possible, there would be HHO generators on every car. No, it's far more likely there's something we're not being shown going on here.
@@charlidog2 that is my question exactly. How much charge goes now to the battery. Wil it deplete or would the charge coil in the generator do a sufficient job keeping that battery up to charge. I wonder...
When you run an engine using water the engine runs smoothly and quieter
I had been pondering about the correct AFR for running hydrogen instead of petrol. Turns out half covering your intake is about right.
Hydrogen is the smallest element on the periodic table, and is nigh impossible to contain. I don't understand why so many people get all up in a bunch, interested in using hydrogen for engines. It isn't a fuel so much as it's a fuel can. And a leaky one at that.
@@billkichman7770 Maybe because we are burning all the petrol avaible in crappy "Wish" furniture and that we need to find alternative solutions.
Hydrogen will never run out as you mentioned it is the simplest atom.
and that running engines with a basic water electrolysis is so simple that just any college student could make it safely ?
@@billkichman7770 It's interesting because the raw materials for getting hydrogen are readily available, the methods are pretty straightforward and the oxidation products are harmless.
We are having trouble storing excess electricity, so of course people look to water electrolysis. As you said, it also offers major complications, but you can't blame people for being interested.
This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me.
@@gonzaloayalaibarre "This video, however, is just plain silliness. Why would anyone want to use a battery to power water electrolysis that will be immediately oxydized is beyond me."
When you don't have an electric engine available, this is a less efficient alternative I guess...
@@billkichman7770 i guess the hindenburg never existed then
Though, the electrolysis separation of water into 2 parts Hydrogen and 1 part Oxygen has been known for many years, if not isolating the anode and cathode chambers, you are producing HHO gas, or Browns Gas, not just Hydrogen. Then the 'gurgle' tank prior to engine start only bubbled 3 or 4 bubbles, and the engine took off quickly like it was already primed.
Another commenter properly indicated that the stock carburetor is designed for a liquid fuel to 'draw up' the fuel jet. There would need to be a modified intake to allow the HHO to flow into the Air-Fuel chamber, and hopefully under some level of pressure or it would be insufficient to give a rich enough atmosphere to ignite the engine.
Good video, but need to validate there is not another fuel source on the generator, hidden behind the power plate. Camera angles prevent the specific view to witness carburetor setup.
Also HH+ powder. More detail on they 'mystery' chemical. I doubt this is made by SikaFix and their HH+ product.
The HH+ was given to us by an anonymous subscriber. He claims to be patenting it after knowing about it. Don't know the backstory of it. We are just cautious to release too much information because so many people disappeared in the past.
where can a person get this HH+
@@HiddentechnologyYT
"Many people disapeared..." just because of this we must give it to people. Secret is when "know it" less than two people. All other is "i just want money" or "i just make videos to earn money blah blah..."
Big DISSLIKE for your video and channel. I go unsubscribe. Bye.
I guess for some generators there are LPG carburetors (not really carburetors anymore, more like there to regulate inflow) out there which should be possible to be used. What I am wondering about is more like: Under load the generator would take more Hydrogen than under little load:
If always operated at high load, the engine would die eventually, not getting enough fuel (or getting lower Hz on the power output or "brown out" which could damage some electrical devices) or you would have too much fuel, pressure in the tank getting above safe levels and I do not want to be around when the brown gas accidentally ignites (I guess a safety valve which leads to a pipe immediate flaming off the excess fuel might actually work.But you really would need to make sure it is not back flaming)
Bruce HH O offers all that is needed for combustion, without aid of gasoline, engine vacuum is all that is needed along with spark to fire the HH O mixture, the throttle plate of the carburetor regulates the amount of mixture allowed in the generator, However the governor will not function; I have built HH O systems using solar panels and led acid batteries, modified DC current and electrolyte to aid voltage production at the plates of HH O generator, check valves to prevent backflow and explosion; Bottom line, The carburetor is basically bypassed and jets are no longer needed because HH O is already atomized and moved by engine vacuum.
Asking the same as a lot of other people. How long will the core last, and how long will it run on a single fill of water? I'd love to put this on a boat for overnighting and house power.
An fire arrestor is needed because hydrogen is highly explosive, increasing the chances of an explosion.
Better off using a battery
Kudos on the effort put into manufacturing this thing. I could never entertain spending this much time and money for a bit of theater.
its not just a bit of theater, his videos gets pushed up the ladder and he get monotised
or likes. or subscriptions. or the money that comes from that.
so you're saying it's not real? Why don't you build one and prove it?
@@gohighhustle It doesnt work on the bases of physics alone. The energy required to for electrolysis is less than you would get from the hydrogen made, its a system that is always losing energy, and since the only energy input is the battery, its basically a joke of a video
He is actually earning money with this theater lol.
Aww snaps.... Daily Dose hooked me up with a amazing video. Thanks for sharing your work man.
same
Me too, I knew this was a thing already i cars.
Amazing how the engine keeps running even when the bubbles stop.
;-) That's true.
Yup, that bubbler was producing about a bubble a second.
What are these bubbles?
Voce queria ver o atomo? Que visão heim
If you lose the bubbles you greatly increase efficiency.
Habe das schon vor 1 Jahren getestet, funktioniert einwandfrei. Getestet bei einem Westfalia Benzingenerator.
Ça fonctionne combien de semaines ?🎉
next stop waterpowered lawn mowers cars and power to run refrigerators freezers home heaters. Bring it all on. Awesome video. Keep up the good work
Years ago, I added a similar generator to my van to allow the hydrogen to mix with gasoline. I did get a bit better mileage but the computer in the van read too rich mixture and sometimes I got way worse mileage. Then there was a problem with the oxygen sensors. Bottom line was I spent a lot of money on devices to override the computer. Should have bought an older carburetor type vehicle, but I'm just a simple guy testing things of interest. No money bags. Living in CA, you are required to get smog tested every two years. I was excited to show most exhaust was water vapor. Smog guy was going to have me sent to jail for modifying my exhaust system when he saw all the relays and other handy work I had done. He gave me a week to put everything back to factory specs or he was turning me in. Dollars down the drain. This stuff works but the oil police aren't going to allow it. Find an old copy of Nexus magazine 1990s that shows how a rich band person ran his older model Cadillac on just water. Never had enough money to duplicate. Men in Black (oil) men found out and threatened him and family if he went public, but he was able to show schematic of how to build and hook up. Move away from CA with their smog police. Fukushima happened when car manufacturer was going to produce water fueled cars and the meb caused under ocean explosion to wipe out facility and as threat to anyone else who might step on profits. Do it for yourself or go open source but if you try to go big........
the engine has to be designed from the crank up for hydrogen and it has to have some specialized kit to keep the oil from sludging out and killing the engine because the product of burning h2 is hi temp steam which happily infuses with oil under the operating temps and pressures but separates out in the oil pan as the engine cools that is the ultimate failure point for h2 engines not the fuel or less than ideal combustion process. that said there are far better engines to use for h2 as fuel people just assume that ice is the way to go and it is not
The last part Fukushima gave away your entire story what did you really smoke before writing BS.
Or just leave California lol
@@mouserr yet there are hundreds of vehicles running around with plug and play hho kits. Sure a motor built for hydrogen is best but if you have the proper kits you can get great results. Just do a simple search and look for vehicles with high mileage use. You will find them.
Wouldn't the power be reduced if you used tap water?
I never use tap water on my garden. It stunts the growth quite noticeably.
impressive video, professional machinery building, i have tried a HHO generator using koh and baking soda as catalysts that weren't efficient enough to run an engine solely but I had so much fun melting multiple materials such as glass metals etc.. by turning the generator into a torch, now as per the HH+ secret component that will make this happen (a catalyst that will increase the efficiency of the electrolysis that can be a game-changer) I would please ask for a sample to try it myself if possible or a video showing the generator running for a more extended period of time to prove that the energy is not withdrawn from the battery to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen (and indeed the water level should decrease since we are splitting it into HHO gas I suggest building a reservoir to maintain a steady stream of distilled water to refill the electrolysis tank is required unless you unscrew the filter container and refill it with water regularly)
Yes it could be running off the batery
Where can i get HH+? 😅😅
@@nasriamzar3083 i wish i knew
The battery is providing the energy. It is not self sustaining. There is a huge energy loss in electrolysis, then also in the engine. So the energy source is the battery, not the water. It only gets a little energy back from the alternator. You're making a gas that is cheaper than gasoline vapour over maybe 10 years. But charging a battery from the wall and using an inverter is cheaper and more efficient and doesn't need a machine shop. So, really, after a certain amount of time, the battery would drain down to a point it is completely damaged, then the electrolysis would stop, then the engine would stop. But you showed you can run an engine off Brown's gas. The air intake is being used to reduce the concentration of the gas. At full load, this battery might last 10 minutes. Maybe an hour if you drain it down to 1V and don't mind buying batteries often. You could achieve the same by just taking off the spark plug and using the alternator as an inverter if you have an old or free generator laying around. Inverters are cheap. Very cheap. You could build one of those.
I would like to see you build a water system for a vehicle that actually works that anyone can build.
Working on cars isn't easy but do able. It'd definitely be a lengthy one. Considering your completely changing your combustion system from fossil to hydro wich both have different combustion systems internally in a vehicle. Idk enough to say what to change but you could keep your gas tank and just change the rest that lead up to the Injectors from what he's done. Complex but do-able
It's amazing how someone with zero grasp of physics has access to such an awesome machine shop.
That's not a machine shop. He has hand tools and a simple $100 drill press.
Crazy how a commenter on RUclips can know who a person is despite not knowing jack about them! You must have a superpower!
you are rude and you should do some experiments with HHO yourself
RIP to this guy
What happened to him?
@@iwannabeawitch LMAO he hasnt died it was a reference to stanley meyer
@@santiklingo oh fuck 💀💀💀💀 ig we just wait and see what happens to him
Seems like it could work but I see a few problems. How do you regulate the flow of hydrogen? Usually, gasoline will raise the carburetor float to stop fuel flow but with no gasoline flow, how does this happen?
How do you keep the hydrogen from building too much pressure? what happens if the motor should backfire? a check valve may fix that problem but then hydrogen pressure will build. If you could install a pressure gauge with a sensor with a relay to shut off power to the hydrogen stimulator when the pressure hits a certain pressure and turn it back on when the pressure drops. How long would that little bit of water provide hydrogen? What about water vapor in the motor? would all the inner steel parts rust? seems like it would work if these problems were addressed
Always watch your back. Big oil companies don't like when people do stuff like this
That's great. Years ago I made a hydrogen generator similarly which was to boost combustion of a gas or diesel engine. You have shown the water and electrolyte is enough to do the tick without gs or diesel. Fantastic work. Thank you from all of us inventive types.
@Herbert Fuchs I would like to talk to you more about that your experiment
So you built a generator that runs on a battery. Good job. This is like shining a spotlight on a solar panel and claiming you have free electricity.
Yeah then it's night time.
Your device is splendid. In a Japanese company, I thought that it was Toushiba, but I distributed oxygen and hydrogen at the time of hydrogen generating and thought about a method to leave oxygen unattended in the air.
Very safe.
I am older age of Japan, but I make a team with the elderly person of the cause engineer and want to produce it for the world. I want to learn a detailed thing.
I do not understand an electrolyte well, but the eldest son leaves the chemical course at a university.
Also, my car uses gasoline to generate electricity, which is then used in the motor to run. Comfortable.
study proton water exchange membrane water electrolysis process you will know more about what he did
The problem with this demo is that current best processes for water electrolysis (PEM or alkaline electrolysis) has an effective electrical efficiency of about 60%. Looked at another way to produce 1 kg of hydrogen (which has a specific energy of 143 MJ/kg) requires 50-55 kWh (180-200 MJ) of electricity. Its true that 120 MJ/kg of 1 Kg of hydrogen is almost three times more energy dense than petrol. However, such a process uses 55 kWh to get an energy equivalent of just 33.6 kWh of energy. Then you take that hydrogen and use a conventional IC engine to generate power, which has a max efficiency of just 25%. So you start with say 55 kWh which then becomes 33.6 kWh and the ICE generator can only produce about 8 kWh of power at the end of the process. Not a great idea when the original 55 kWh of power which began the process was generated by the coal or natural gas powered grid which itself is only about 30% efficient. So the real "fuel to work" efficiency is about 6%. In other words you just wasted 94% of the energy in the original fuel. This clearly is not some super technology to get excited about?
I didn't realize hydrogen is that energy dense, what about using it with an electric motor? That's way higher efficiency than an internal combustion engine right?
@@n8rson765 You would just add another conversion which means even more losses add lower total efficiency.
@@hs3881
So, generate power - electrolysis to make hydrogen - reverse the process to release power - drive electric motor, is how that would work? If the power was all green, like from solar, arguably the efficiency of that step isn't what's important per se, but how clean/renewable it is. The idea would be hydrogen instead of a large battery pack. I've heard handling anoring hydrogen is challenging becaused st it leaks so easily, do you know if there's any truth to that?
"100% agree with you" said Stanley Meyer. Then he started his water-powered car and went to tour Angloamerica again. while seriously thinking about your words.
@@n8rson765It depends on how you define energy density. By mass energy density (J/kg) it is but not for volume energy density(J/gal) in room temperature.
Impressive.
Next test is to load the generator with area heaters one at a time to determine the output power.
Load testing the generator has no bearing on the functionality of the gas motor driving it. The question is “How long with that container of water continue to produce hydrogen?”
@@01saved load testing the generator absolutely has everything to do with this. The generator started as a 3kw generator on fossil fuels, wonder what it is able to produce on hydrogen?
I have one problem, the amount of energy required to produce hydrogen via electrolysis is more then the energy you get back from combusting the hydrogen. Is there some secret additive that I am missing to make the hydrogen production efficient?
Adam, what you said about the efficiency of the process is absolutely true! That is why this is NOT a Perpetual Motion Machine. Energy from OUTSIDE the generating system is constantly needed.....The Battery. Disconnect it and the system stops. Now if he charged the Battery from the generator........🤣😱🤣
@@winbobmarks8236 On point explanation. Of course solar energy can be used, but then the problem of solar dependency also comes to play, as well as low effieciency.
Another thing that almost no one mentions, tho, is the fact that storing hydrogen is a problem in itself. High flamable/explosive, can escape cointainer due to metal absorbing/bubble forming, needs to be stored in high pressure due to it's low density. The risk are too high, and the fact that there are better options, like natural gas that can be made from organic matter. Of course, gas fuel in itself is more complicated than dealing with liquids.
@@captainpjarker what are you talking about? No reaction know or observed thus far in human history produces more energy than the initial input. That is how entropy and the flow of time works. We don't use wind turbines or coal energy because they reaction is efficient or geneates energy from nowhere, but because they are widely available and the extraction of said energy is simple. Which is not true to hydrogen: it don't exist in high quantities and at an affordable price, the storage process is difficult and it is highly flammable/explosive. Not to mention there are better gas options than hydrogen, like i said earlier, natural gas from organic matter or biodiesel, although they can't compete with petroleum due to cost and inefficiency.
@@TheCuteZombie Hydrogen is actually a lot cheaper, only problem is greed. No one has put money into a hydrogen system. hydrogen could be much more efficient and safer then any other fuel type. The only problem is that they would lose control over their money source. Once something big to refine hydrogen is made, it will try to be turned smaller due to hydrogen being one of the most abundant gases.
Theres articles and studies done that proves hydrogen could be the future if we actually tried.
@@TheCuteZombie exactly. So why are you saying this is useless? Of COURSE there’s going to be energy loss. That’s not the point. You’re focusing on the negatives instead of the actual theory. Half the people in these comments don’t know what they’re talking about and the half that do want to act like a new fuel system is a negative? How?
Also, did you really just say hydrogen isn’t readily abundant? You’re joking, right? It’s LITERALLY the most abundant element in the universe, so if THATS not abundant enough, neither is coal or oil or gas.
It can’t compete with petroleum?? Bro please for both our sakes stop talking out of your ass 😂 have you seen gas prices lately? 7$ for a gallon of the stuff. 5$ for a pack of 24 water bottles is a pretty high estimate. Not to mention hydrogen burns more than 50% slower than gasoline (that means it’s more than double as efficient) so don’t tell me it “can’t compete”. You have no idea what you’re talking about lmfao. Probably the only reaosn hydrogen cars aren’t more popular is because base hydrogen gas is 4x as expensive as gasoline, but that’s buying the gas straight. If you buy purified water? Not even close to the same cost for 2x as much efficiency
With this built out at scale so much could be saved in the hands of consumers! Houston could be helped in such a huge way!
Excellent, that's just what I need to keep my pet unicorn warm in winter. Will be a struggle to pay for gas this winter, at a time when there are no people venturing out to catch a glimpse of him.
You are not running HHO Gas only. In one of your liquids, you are running a carbon fuel with a little bit of oxyhydrogen mixture. The bubbles are very slow coming out of the bubbler. Prove me wrong I have 13 years of experience using oxyhydrogen. Open up each Container Unedited and take a match to the liquid before you run the machine. Nice trick. You are running carbon fuel vapors with a little bit of oxyhydrogen. You are either running sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide for your electrolyte in the water for electrolysis.
Wow. Is that what you are really concerned with, what the actual chemistry is? He is showing us that it is possible that we dont need gasoline for fuel.
@@johnnygonzalez9721 You need to ask him before turning on the machine to dip a piece of wood in the liquid and light it with a lighter before starting the engine. Once he can show there is no fuel in those cylinders then he is running 100% oxyhydrogen. The question is he said he did something to the engine. Why did he not explain what he did to the engine that he did not say in the video? Have you ever run an engine off of oxyhydrogen gas? I have run engines 100% off of oxyhydrogen stock engines with no changing of the timing. Visit my RUclips site and see what I have done with large Oxyhydrogen machines. Why does he not tell us what his electrolyte mixture is? I have a machine that makes 175 Liters per minute. What you see in his video is a small amount of Oxyhydrogen. How can he start up a machine right away before any amount of gas has accumulated to start from the beginning? Carbon fuel starts immediately oxyhydrogen has to make a certain amount before you have the engine respond to it.
Mechanic/technician with sense of humour 😊
Your kind of video editing is funny, creative n entertaint without lost technical detail of information, I like it 👍
Try to apply it for welding machine also, please
I have to say I am incredibly impressed by this video. The ability to hide the fuel line is very well done. Should really consider a career in movie special effects
Would be awesome to see a comparison of one of these running on gas only vs your hydrogen version (which is awesome btw)
Questions that come to my mind: how long can each one run before refueling? assuming unlimited fuel, how long can each one run for before breaking? what kind of internal differences occur with the combustion components, any damage or internal / blowby issues? same oil cycle or any noticed differences there? running temp on the motor i would think would be less if anything, can definitely see a lot of positives with this solution beyond the obvious not burning fossil fuels. also is water produced and collected as a byproduct?
It's a fuel cell. I don't think the alternator is running to keep the battery charged. I don't think it could. Energy in has to equal energy out. The battery is draining while electrolysis is occurring. That's why there are two switches.
@@williamcouts7357 I have it in my mind if it can run a 3k W motor it can probably recharge the battery or atleast put some of it back into it so it doesn't discharge as quickly but maybe your right. In my mind it wouldn't break laws of physics since the engine brings in additional air into the combustion chamber (not burning all gases produced from electrolysis alone)
Ok, and when the water will vanish from the Earth, what you gona do...move on Mars?
@@ioann235 Lol this has gotta be a troll. Seawater is among one of the most abundant resources we have and the water doesn't vanish from electrolysis, it is recombined through the combustion process
@@philuent Recombine from what if you burn the hydrogen using the oxygen...This is the reason hydrogen engines never got approval for use...not because of the oil companies😎
The longer that _outdoor test_ went on, the less gas that was being produced and this miraculous engine still continued to run at the same rpm!
The gas level from the hydrogen tank did not decrease.
Also, if oxygen is not separated, the resulting gas is dangerous in itself.
And the whole system doesn't need a carburetor in this case.
@@janyjozsef I could see that the bubbles in the second water tank were often getting smaller and less frequent. That is proof of the reduction in gas production.
The whole thing is pure hogwash!
Yeah I noticed the same thing
Definitely look like there was not enough hydrogen produced to have that engine running
But if it’s not smoke and mirrors well done
Fenomenale , complimenti. Merita di essere sviluppato e applicato in tutta la sua potenzialità risolvendo moltissimi problemi di oggi. Andati avanti.
This water based portable generator set deserves to be commercialized ASAP in order to retire the carbon emmitting old gasoline based generators from the consumer electronics market.
Great minds think alike. I am presently working on a similar project. My generator doesn't have electric start so it will work somewhat differently. With measurements. Pressure, and volume of gas produced, amps and volts of electrolysis, and other details.
You are running a motor using OH which is produced by the energy of the same motor and also running other devices with it??!! well, you are creating energy my friend, congratulations!! Nobel Prize for you!
con artist prize for him.
Oh yes i was looking for such comments only cause i was wondering the same, and how does a gasoline engine run on HHO even
@@aryan1211_ yes, and how does a gasoline engine work with using only one small HHO bubble per second...... But I have to say that it was a nice mechanic job though
From what I saw you connected the hho output to the fuel line to carburetor. That CAN'T work. You would have to supply the hho directly into the air intake. Then you would have to add a way to regulate it. From the amount of bubbles it isn't producing enough to run engine either. Then if these things were corrected, it still will only run until the battery is depleted.
Ha ha ha - well done for spotting that. Plus the fact there was nearly no gas produced near the end and the motor obviously running at around 300 revs.
Another click bait spam video exposed!
Things I would like to know:
* Torque of the motor running on petrol vs hydrogen.
* Amperage required for the electrolysis to create the hydrogen
* Would a petrol/hydrogen hybrid work? (petrol with hydrogen boosted)
* Type of water (distilled, sea water, drinking water etc)
Great experiment :)
Your questions are not relevant since a combustion engine can't be run by water. This video is BS.
@@heinzpg It's not run by water. It's using electrolysis to seperate H2 and O. Then burning hydrogen. Rockets boosters are hydrogen. Have you tried reading? It's how you can get information.
@@Hunty49 I am quite aware that hydrogen obtained by electrolysis is seen here as possible fuel! But it is still outright impossible to run a car this way! Sorry, I feel it is you who needs additional informations and I can give them. Why can't you run a car this way? First of all, the production of hydrogen by electrolysis consumes more energy than the produced hydrogen can deliver. Second, the electrical energy for the electrolysis is supposed to be produced by a generator, driven by the hydrogen combustion motor. Both of them are not 100% efficient, this can't work out.
In numbers: For one unit of electrical power you get perhaps 0.7 units of hydrogen power. The mechanical output of a hydrogen combustion engine with this hydrogen input power will be around 0.3 units. If you use this mechanical power to drive the generator you will get 0.25 units of electrical power, which can not substitute the 1.0 which are needed for the hydrogen production. And your car hasn't even moved, it only turned the generator ...
They claim here they found "secret additives" to make electrolysis more efficient. I don't believe that crap, and efficiency can never be over 100% anyway. This video is a click bait, and it is not the first one of this sort.
I can't help but be doubtful. I've been following doomsday people and preppers and DIY project types for years (with a focus on people doing stuff cheaply and creatively because that's all that will be in my wheelhouse) and a semi-quick DIY build that basically replaces your gas bill with the price of water... This would be absolutely everywhere I've been looking for the past decade. It's too simple to do if people know it works so it would be in every other conversation in my group. Hell, nothing here is science that didn't exist during the great depression. Do you think those people wouldn't have figured out a way to diy a system like that to have f'ken power? Save money they needed to feed themselves and their children? Better their lives?
And I don't believe for a second the answer to everything I'm saying is the "secret additive". A there's other stuff you can use to run that reaction and B even if you're using something subpar the answer to that is just building a bigger system. You don't think people would build a large ugly system if it meant using water to run their generators? If this genuinely worked the over a million community of people that love this stuff would've figured it out and blasted it to all their friends. It would be a staple of the community. The gas companies could keep it out of the news or off youtube or facebook, but this isn't a group of people that barely go outside and interact with other people. It's just not possible to hide that kind of secret imo. We're too connected and we're a demographic that likes to meet up in real life (Comparatively. I'm just trying to make the point this community doesn't live a hundred percent online where this kind of "news" could be suppressed)
I hope this is useful to somebody out there who might be excited enough to drop a couple hundred dollars making their own. Wait on it and see if anybody credible comments on the video or if there's a wave of people making them successfully. Perpetual energy machines get millions of views and those are all shams. Like those, this doesn't pass the most basic common sense test.
Hope so as well
I think the same
🤣😆
Aye, think you might be right there.
Technology hides, forbids... Do you think that rockets into earth's orbit run on coal? How would the oil lobby make money if this were developed and put into wider use? Why didn't Tesla allow the development of free electricity?
With small additions this works more efficiently with a high frequency generator.
Quick someone download this before YT takes it down
Lol 😆
Why would anyone need a video with a bunch of useless lies and misinformation in it? That's just not how our world works, nor from the physical perspective, neither from the common sense one. Perpetual motion engines are not only physically impossible, but also if there was any invention close to this, whole world would be already using them. Oil companies are not the ultimate power, like many conspirologists believe and car manufacturers would already be competing with each other for the most effective water engine.
Have it on my privat Cloud ;-)
This is what I saw. The volume of gas being produced steadily decreased from the first turn on indoors to end of the outdoor test. You did not mention what the state of charge was on the battery at the start and at the end therefore it is probable that the extra energy to produce the gas AND operate the power tools came from the starting battery thus decreasing the voltage which is why the gas production slowly went down. I'm not saying its impossible to do what you claimed, I'm saying I don't think YOU actually did it though. What is the electrolyte? How does it work to produce more gas energy than the amount of energy coming in from the generator. If you are claiming more than 100% efficiency then NO proof was offered. You would need to monitor the volume of gas production and its energy content and compare that to how much electrical energy was consumed by the electrolyzer and the tools. You need to account for all the energy coming and going, You did not do that.
What people don't get, is that most of the energy is coming from the hydrogen in the water. Yes it is!
Hydrogen has a kwh rating of 3 kwh per cubic meter, so about 0.003 kwh/liter, at ambient pressure, 1 litre of water will produce roughly 1240 litres of hydrogen. So for it to power that hand tool which is probably a couple hundred watts for a few seconds, then you likely aren't going to see much of a change.
Саме це відео обман! газ майже не виділявся у колбі. Газу дуже мало для роботи генератора!
@@AlphA-175 You don't need much. Hydrogen is very efficient unlike carbon-based fossil fuel.
@@PaulFrankAdams Aside from the fact that this youtuber is a deceiver already known for his videos capturing views to monetize, there is no engine with a gain equal to 1 of the kind. Also, anyone who were to invent a similar project, do you think they would reveal it to the whole world for free? He'd make a lot of money, wake up people!
The fact that this technology lives as an obscure video on the Internet while an engineered energy crisis is being carried out all the world tells you everything about the state of humanity.
Was nice knowing you!
Thank you for sharing this amazing video, hope other people watching this wonderful video will understand the knowledge this person is giving away for free.,...
Yes, i love the knowledge he is presenting. He is showing how to trick people in the "good old snake oil salesmen" style.
@@ogi22 And nobody in their right mind doesn't realize the mass and generational child abuses damaging the majority. Let's talk about what's really going wrong and why before another innocent and helpless child's life is ruined, eh?
@@01mustang05 Ah yes the old "Think of the children!!!" argument, works every time!
Amazed completely. Thank you for sharing this for us! Professional work.
😂😂
Remember the golden saying ( You are either part of the solution or part of the problem) . God has blessed you that you are an extraordinary person. And a blessing to humanity. I installed the same system on my vehicle and Chanelled the hydrogen gas into my intake manifold, and my gas mileage improved tremendously. This is the way of future. We pray soon .
Now I want to see one of the better known workshop RUclipsrs have a go at this, since the fab seems well documented enough. See what their findings are in comparison.
> well documented enough
"Secret" ingredient.
> See what their findings are in comparison.
There's the rub. Would not withstand scientific scrutiny, i.e. repeatable and reproducible results.
Was really hoping to see it hooked up to the carb and how metering to the carb was done. Leaving out some of that makes me a bit doubtful even if I do believe in the possibility of the technology.
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
Being that H is a gas, much like propane, it is probably injected from a plate just behind the carb much like a propane conversion kit. Not much science behind it, hydrogen like propane is highly flammable and auto ignites fast hence the quick starts.
the basics were used in a toy .. back in the 70s .. its just been suppressed to the utmost by the power hungry elite .. why are we letting kids make rocket fuel? cant have that .. they might get too smart ... definitely a SHTF tech.. at this point.. i am only wondering the degradation of hydrolysis without HH+ which could be difficult to acquire .. unless one stocked up then i would like to know utilization rates etc..
Anyone who's built an HHO maker/ HHO torch, like this. Knows it takes a lot of power to produce the HHO gas.....I built a small HHO torch a few years back that ran wired directly to a 100W solar panel. I used an air pump needle used to fill up basketballs for the torch tip & the 100W solar panel was enough to give me a little pen flame. An engine will run off HHO but it takes a lot of electricity to create the HHO. It's more efficient just to use an electric motor/electric vehicle. The little 12V generator starting battery might have enough power to run the generator for a few seconds before it goes dead. But he didn't just build a "free power" runs on water device. If someone can figure out how to produce HHO gas from water by using a lot less electricity/power. That's actually what the "big breakthrough" be. Using electricity to break water down into hydrogen & oxygen gas has been known since the late 1800's.
To save gasoline/get better MPGs, you could however. #1 build a solar battery bank (or buy a solar generator) #2 Build an HHO generator & run the HHO generator off the battery pack, that's recharged by solar or wall plug-in. Then use a combination of gasoline & HHO to power a vehicle. Say 60% gasoline mixed with 40% HHO gas. In an older lower compression engine & you might have to retard the engine timing & bit.
Only a little doubtful ? I would have to see a full technical spec and calculations to believe it. This is yet another version of a perpetual motion machine. Impossible.
It was my father who invented the engine in the 60s but certainly before. He sent his plans, I think, to the authorities at the time in France. After receiving a glowing response, he never heard from his discovery again!
Greetings, can you explain how he did it ?
Lol, my great grandpa, before he passed away says energy is actually free but is suppressed. He told us how to do it and had schematics as he was rocket engineer. He had a working hydrogen engine as well but a visit from the government stopped him in mass producing it. He was warned that if he continued, it would be his end. Maybe your grandpa and my great grandpa worked together lol
@@mirdraco guys you need to introduce us to your grandpas.
@@lolguy-x9n Oh he's dead sadly. But we still make and ride wood gas cars for the family.
An car engine is basically just mini controlled explosions, you can make a simple engine if you know the basics and principle.
Each such demonstration its initial cost of production for the set up and its unit of production cost for certain type of application should be also given at least .
This is a great project. One thing to consider. I have a 10 year old TroyBilt 7kw electric start generator. It does NOT have on board charging of it's starter battery. It came with a 1.5 amp wall wart type charger that plugs into the end panel. I could use this project but I would have to wire in a higher current charger to drive the HHO unit and also keep the battery charged. This is not a problem and is cheap and simple to do. I might also have to scale up your plans as my generator / engine is more than twice as big as yours. Just a couple things for your viewers to think about with their units.
Is this application is approved by govt.? Is there a generator of this type available in market or anyone make one on order, if so at what cost?
@@cdixitulu8751 My TroyBilt cost $700.00 U.S. 10 years ago. They may have been replaced by an "improved" model since then. If not, the price has surely gone up by now.
An HHO fuel setup like the one in the video wouldn't be approved by U.S fire code without a proper regulator. In properly built natural gas / propane systems, there is a regulator that senses if the engine stalls. If this happens, the regulator shuts off the flow of gas so it doesn't build up into an explosion hazard.
This couldn't be done in an HHO system because when the engine stalls, instead of the gas flow stopping, the HHO gas pressure would keep building until the pressure vessel either popped or the pressure got high enough to stop electrolysis.
Rather than the safety regulator, one could connect a 120 / 240 volt relay coil to the AC output and the contacts connected to switch the DC current off when the AC voltage cuts out. To get the reaction started, one could connect a momentary push button switch across the relay contacts. To start for the first time, hold down the push button switch to get gas production started. after 30 seconds or so, crank the engine. Once running, the relay will close connecting the current to the HHO unit and sustain gas production. This will also serve to protect the battery from over discharge should an
unattended generator quit running,
I think the "secret ingredient" - hh+ could be substituted by snake oil.
@@pedanticsmith5613 They already have internal combustion engines in cars that run well on hydrogen. The reason there aren't more of them is the problem of onboard storage for enough range and the lack of infrastructure to fuel them.
This project and one other one that I saw working in a pickup truck are basically the same as commercially produced cars except instead of storing hydrogen, they produce it for use on the spot.
It also has the added feature of producing the exact amount of oxygen for efficient combustion.
If there was some way of recovering and reusing the water vapor from the exhaust, this would be the closest thing to perpetual motion as you could get.
I'm NOT a believer in perpetual motion machines but hydrogen and oxygen, when burned together, are not destroyed. They are bonded together to form water. When you separate water into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis, you break that bond between the two gases. When you burn them together, you reestablish that bond and being that the 2 gases are the only constituents of the fuel, you can break and re--bond them to infinity where as with gasoline, it is a complex mix of chemicals that can't be reassembled once it is burned.
The only thing that keeps this from being perpetual motion is the constant input of energy from the battery.
@@jeffmccrea9347 I concur Jeff, hydogen is a fuel that can be used in engines. But this youtuber has a "secret ingredient" I want more real science!
Thank you for your demonstration. However, you need to Load the Generator for longer periods of time to prove your having an ' Energy-efficient, or Net Gain ' from Hydrolysis. Not just depleted battery current.
Si el Generador eléctrico genera suficiente energía como para accionar la taladradora y la amoladora, también genera suficiente energía como para cargar la batería
Hola podrías decirme que material usaste para la fabricación de las celdas?
Not only that he should used a dry cell instead. Wet cell are dangerous.... One little spark in that wet cell and BANG! SO YOU PEOPLE BE CAREFUL TRYING TO BUILD THIS. .
@@omarrodriguez3662 acciaio inox
@@ComplexOne thats why he put in the flash chamber. It prevents back fire all the way back to the source and he filled it as high as possible to keep as little hydrogen stored in it.
What is even shown here? Even believing that a gasoline generator can run on hydrogen without further modification, you have to put in more energy for the electrolysis of water than you can get out by running the generator. Why use the generator at all?
Hey so I'm curious, How long do you think this Generator will run on the water you give it and how long would you say you can use it before you have to de-rust or replace the electrolysis core?
I would love to Build one of these for long-term use, but would like to know what your opinion is on that and if you have any other suggestions or concerns for using it as a pretty continuous power source.
I saw a place recently that converted a 650cc motorcycle to one of these, i would love to make a small car or something like a motorcycle at the least run like this.
He hasn't removed the possibility of this system running from battery power in such short tests. I'm not saying it is or isn't, just would be nice to see and know 7AF
Never de rust it. The corrosion layer protects metal underneath! That goes for EVERYTHING!
@@tarheelcountry1868 Well i would love to try this and see how much power ya get for what it puts out with fuel, if i find a generator to use, i might run some long power tests and see what i get
Это прекрасно и гениально! Но пока есть нефть и газ и магнаты имеют прибыль, такие технологии могут быть только в гараже. Браво!
You cannot ever get more power from converting hydrogen to water (burning it) than you can from turning water to hydrogen (in fact, you will generate significant loss). This video, however, is capable of generating money based on nothing but misdirection, so it’s a success in my book! I did notice that he removed the fuel tank so it’s not some kind of gas/hydrogen mix which-I dunno, could help a little I guess.
Love this videos, they tend to comeback when gas price are higher. This is on high resolution yeey
These!
I don't know what adjustments you might make on a carburetor that shouldn't have any adjustments if it were strictly HHO. Also, there appears to only be a fraction of the gas going through your flash-back to run an engine of that size. Since we can't see the carburetor, and entire setup, I doubt it's legit.
Hydrogen is a better fuel. You don't need as much.
Good Job! How long would the water last and how often would the electrodes need to be rebuilt? And, we we ever learn what HH+ is?
You did a good job. But since the hydrogen molecule structure is very small, it will enter the aluminum inside the engine, and the engine will break down after a short time.
fo sure it wont last long the running
Needs a better metal and anti oxiding agent.
HEAD'S UP! GREAT WORK, HOWEVER.. output cannot be greater than input. You're getting a boost from a) a charged battery and maybe b) whatever secret formula in the hh mixture (?). I have made several hho generators and tested them for cutting torches and on vehicles to increase mpg. I found that it's definitely possible to make an engine run more efficiently. But output cannot be greater than input. Listen to what I'm saying. Yes it's possible to make a gasoline engine more efficient. But a HHO generator by itself cannot put out more than input. I can best explain that by comparing to a turbocharger on an engine. You can install a turbocharger on an engine and get more power but only because you're adding more AIR AND FUEL. So you're only able to get more power by increasing the amount of air and fuel. However, it is possible to increase the efficiency of an engine with a turbocharger. I believe this is because you're using waste energy (heat out of exhaust) to power turbine. In return you get better atomization of air going back to engine (through compressor). Regardless of increased efficiency, output will not be greater than input.
In your example I believe your fully charged battery is working hard in the electrolysis process and cannot keep up. I don't know what other tricks are involved but that's my first guess
Yes it can if you now how
It creates a combustible fuel from the water, so output is greater than input. An engine I.C.E. uses no input energy, but it creates power internally that's what defines an engine compared to a Motor which uses external energy source as power input to create mechanical energy in power output, or pto.
Bro, they are not claiming this to be perpetual motion machine.. It's like saying that output can't be higher than input for gasoline. But yet you can light a single match and burn whole town with enough gasoline. It's the same with any other fuel. Here, fuel is Hydrogen. Only difference is that this engine works both as "generator-refinery" (wrong word, english is not my first language) where it's creating the fuel from water, and then using collected gas (H) to power the engine
You fail to grasp the concept of fuel combustion dynamics, combustible fuel contains the potential energy which has a range limit that exceeds any practical use to be a factor, hydrogen Hydrogen and oxygen have a higher volatility and produce more energy by volume than a 17-1 air fuel ratio of gasoline, at half of the air intake, the engine produces more power output, while water and oxygen are the emissions from combustion*
(*as far as I'm aware)
You may be thinking of a hydrolytic power generator which does produce more output than input, one powers the entire grid in Homosassa State Park in Homosassa, FL. Don't take my word for it, Google that shit...
I don't think we should underestimate the practical things of invention,all it takes is to go one step further and you will have it.
The power is coming from the battery. On starting the system you can see the gas bubbling up. This feeds the engine, but since the water to gas to water cycle isn't sustainable, it is just smoke and mirrors powered by the energy stored in the battery. Remember the electric start.
Calcium carbide desolved in water will produce acetylene which can run the engine.
I have a BS in Math/Physics so I agree that this perpetual motion concept is BS.
It takes more energy to separate water than you get from burning it's gasses.
Yes, engines can run on hydrogen. Yes, you can split hydrogen out of water using electricity. Yes, you can run an electric generator(alternator) with an engine. All those do is CONVERT energy from one form to another. With losses each time it is converted, and as it is conveyed from one point to the next. None of this is new knowledge. None of this is considered "impossible" in modern times by anyone with any knowledge of science.
Why are we not running cars off water wasted water that we can filter back to clean water. They do it in space where they can clean their urine and drink , yes..so why doesn't someone make a idea and give the information out for free so that we people can do it to are cars world wide. People need to help each other out. Fuck corporate greed or wanting to make tons of money , let's brake these corporations down and bring them to their knees. We need to work together to make it better. If I was smart enough and new how to do it. I would make a device to sale at cost nothing more. But if I could make it in a video showing how to do it , then there has to be away for someone else to help somebody else out and make that one. Why don't we all invest are money into making somthing to work. I just know if I had an idea like that I would do it just to put them all out of business, that's worth more then money to me. That's a smile and laughter and it would bring joy to me that would love to watch these corporations fall to there knees flate on there face. If that got me killed so be it. At least I gave everyone the information for free and I got it out there.
> None of this is considered "impossible" in modern times by anyone with any knowledge of science.
Except to those with the knowledge of conservation of energy, or the first law of thermodynamics ..
@@vtferrand4534 Nothing he is doing in this video is impossible. But none of it violates the laws of physics, none of it will ever result in net energy production, only the illusion of doing so to the naive
@@r6u356une56ney Bottom line: he's shilling an over unity device using a "secret ingredient". That, my friend, is indeed impossible. While the premise and individual components and methods may be plausible, the end result is not. I defy him to publish his findings and have them peer reviewed, and his findings duplicated. That is the heart of the scientific method, and only then will I be convinced.
Does anyone remember the David Mamet play, The Water Engine? (I think it was made into a TV episode in the '80's) In which a lone inventor successfully makes an engine that ran solely on water and attempts to get it patented but is intercepted by (as it turns out) Big Oil and he is quietly "disappeared" and the plans destroyed...
Cautionary tale...
Happened 3 weeks ago in New York agin
saw it myself and it was incredible.Of course the government killed it for al lof us.
I know that guys as well as Stanley Meyer , I have worked on it but now full stopped
Why are you wasting your time with water powered cars? Just go to Hogwarts and build yourself a magic powered car!
That's only partially true. It didn't run in water it ran on hydrogen. However, it did split water at the time of use. the system is a net loss and cannot run indefinitely on "water" as it takes more energy to split water than you get from burning it. I know this as I built one and installed it on my 2003 chevy trailblazer. I still had to use gasoline because the engine would use more hydrogen than the electrolyzer was able to make. no that's not because it was too small.
I have a question. From where the energy comes? Because you need electricity to make electrolysis. And the reaction hydrogen/oxygen gives you electricity. Less because there are losses. It seems to violate the 1st principle of thermodynamics. What I missed?
Very interesting.
The hydrogen yield rate in the output filter is stronger on page 18:00 compare to page 23:00 seems not affecting engine power and rpm.
The engine should stall or stop running by the lack of hydrogen by page 26:00.
Yes I noticed that, well commented. This needs done again in a much more scientifically monitored way. Even so, frankly I am sceptical nice try though. However, if genuine it would simply NOT be released by RUclips or any one else for that matter. Given past history would you??
Same what i thought and when there is put a load on it zero change in rpm"s ???? yeah no way
Another negative comment
@@AbuBakr1 well, what do you think?
Did you remove the Carburator? How long does it last before running out of battery power? What is the current draw on the electrodes?
I actually would love to know if the carb was removed as it starts for 1 second and shuts off again
@@ruriijassem7252 dico ma lo capite che senza carburatore non può funzionare deve dare la giusta miscela aria carburante in questo caso idrogeno ... Ma proprio non avete idea di quello che avete visto ...e inoltre continuo ad essere molto scettico!!!
Видел похожее много лет назад, только там ток подавался на электроды с модернизированного генератора на 30000V. И процесс разложения там был электрический и колба с водой светилась, очень ярко. Лучше водяного двигателя Виктора Шаубергера (из известных) пока ни кто ни чего не предложил. Там другой принцип, а из вращающихся материаллов только сама вода.
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each container. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
@@josidasilva5515 cavitation is used in another industrial secret to heat water at very low cost a device the size of a thermos flask could provide all the hot water you need for pennies a day
Awesome invention never seen before ❤❤❤
Keep doing bro
May Allah bless you 💖❤
I really like the detail you put into building this however in order to completely convince me that this actually works I’m gonna need you to make another video running the hydrogen on the generator and then turning off the fuel supply first and not killing the power on the generator let it starve itself to a dead stop.
Why do we have to convince you of anything. Who died and made you God?
Who died and made you God
@@Thendwill what? He has a good point though I too wanna see it run till it does
Right now the battery is fully charged when it dies how much hydrogen will it make? Is the generator over charging the battery? Do this with the battery unplugged.
@@byronaddison8184 On generators that can start with a electric starter the only purpose the battery serves is to engage the starter to start the generator. After that nothing happens with the battery it just sits there. The generator does NOT charge it use it or anything. This is why generator manufactures supply cheap battery "maintainers" aka low amp battery chargers with their product.
I don't know about the younger folks here, but in my 8th grade science class I learned how to separate hydrogen out of water with 2 'D' cell batteries. It didn't produce a lot of hydrogen but the hydrogen it did produce was ignited in the parking lot because it releases an incredible amount of energy when it burns - highly explosive. Hydrogen has it's own potential energy (.9 kilo-Joules per Mol). *The process of hydrolysis is NOT charging the hydrogen with energy,* it's just putting the hydrogen into a condition where it can release it's own energy.
same here just drop a 9 volt battery into some water and flame the bubbles for nice snap sound
Water has tighter molecule spacing than hydrogen, so you can store a lot of hydrogen in a smaller space using water. Water is much safer to store than liquid hydrogen, so the only reason we dont have this technology is because BIG OIL is shelving it. People have been murdered to keep electrolysis out of cars.
@@NegotiatingReality true!
Amazing generator that no matter what powers it the fact it doesn't seem to react to a load at all is frankly amazing
I noticed it too, especially at the beginning when angle grinder is several times turned on. start of motor can suck more than 50times of nominal current and voltage meter is calm.
Hydrogen can be produced from gasoline or diesel. Good idea. The efficiency is guaranteed not to exceed 10 percent. Magnificent energy slinger. 😢This means that you need 10 generators to run a single engine. If you produce hydrogen at this level of efficiency to power the engine, what is left? .....and then you still need energy for your flex machine? Keep dreaming... 😅I feel sorry for the people who recreate this and waste money and time. On the other hand, if they had paid attention in school...
What is HH+ and where would you get it? Nobody in South Africa has heard of it. Your contraption is amazing and I'm sure many would like to try it
Same question, where can i get it? 😅😅
Essentially, it is just ionised. you can get the same effect with just normal table salt. you just need something to get the electricity to flow through the water as water itself is a bad conductor.
Very cool. I'm sure in a SHTF situation that you could say, charge a device or power some lights etc. I'd rather have it for limited use than not have it at all. Nice job sir 👍
It has been proven numerous times, that it takes more energy to produce the hydrogen, than what the hydrogen can produce in return.
The genset's cylinder will need nanocoating to avoid cavitation. Use two pressure sensors in series to shut down electricity automatically, one on each cylinder. To improve efficiency use pulse with modulation (PWM) You will have to test for best frequency x Voltage combo. The chemical in the water is just to improve conductivity, it would be an interesting study to find one that can protect against corrosion as well. On Mars, just loop the exhaust to the first cylinder and you can circumnavegate the planet on one liter of water.
Oh really so you've tried it? Yeah I've heard all that propaganda; who do you think started it shell or Exxon? Open your mind, I was building these things 30 years ago. Don't listen to what I say don't listen to what other people say the only person you can trust is yourself and if you don't build one or attempt to build one you will never know for sure........ OK maybe if your neighbor has one that works and you don't have to build it and you will then know for sure.
You can’t break physics. It uses more energy than it produces. Another “perpetual motion machine.”
@@CFRoach : can you power car wit this engine?
@@dodidee7727 all I can tell you for sure is what I know: The ones I messed with were used to power small engines that had governors that would keep them running at a constant speed by varying the throttle. In these cases the gas was fed through a tube into a hole that was drilled into the airbox with nothing regulating the gas flow, exactly the same as a do-it-yourself Mickey mouse Small engine propane conversion, but with the propane conversion you use a needle valve to adjust the gas flow and there is still a governor that keeps the engine at a certain RPM. Have I seen actual news reports on TV of cars running using a hydrogen generator: yes a scant few of them over the last 5 decades; but I never saw one on the road or in person. If you could work out how to make the thing not turn into the Hindenburg, be able to compress the gas and store it in a container that could withstand a crash and then be able to feed it into the intake manifold at a regulated rate such as with a propane vehicle to allow for smooth operation I could see it working. But any answer I gave you would just be a guess because I've never seen one work in person. I'm happy to see such an interest in this technology!
They started looking for this years ago I'm glad to see the progress
I'm wondering as to weather or not anybody else has thought about the possibility of fuel still being in the fuel bowl of the carburator? I would be much more into believing this worked if he had taken off the carburator and found a simple way to meter the hydrogen/oxygen gas.
Whether not Weather learn the difference. Weather ==> It is raining today. Whether or not I go to hell as a spelling Nazi, because of idiots like you.
Yes I also wonder about gas flow into the carb through neadle valve.
Sounds like moter only runs at one speed so not need to worry about having a change of gas flow. Carb might have a hole vented to air from float.
Might make it dangerous if not vented to carb side of aircleaner filter.
The carb float and needle valve might as well be taken out. As will not work anymore. I would put a wire mesh inside the carb too to stop a flame or outside spark from ignite the gas in the carb. Like they did with the old miners hats.
@@gtir300hp Well I'm contemplating actual gasoline still being in the carburator bowl to run the engine, idle might just be set high, but if the engine is being ran by the HHO gas it's most likely less power out than in or that is already there. A lead acid appearing battery is visible on the generator for electric start. (I imagine the engineer charges it while running) IF it's running on that little amount of HHO gas.
@@gtir300hp No the gas isn't flowing through the needle valves but is instead flowing through the butterfly valve into the cylinders. The needle valves are redundant in the design ... .. ..
He is using small loads, if he would load it to 80% then that would be a test plug in a refrigerator and lights for one load than a resistance infrared heater and you will see how efficient, and if he had gas in the bowl it would last about 2-1/2 minutes and stalled.
This is awesome, please make it commercially available, in a ready to use version. Already have power generators.
best way is to open source the tech, elites and oil companies, have killed people where it would hurt their finances. the more people have this tech the better it gets, just like Linux.
No you'd be losing money on this compared to a regular petrol or diesel engine
@@asandax6 Even though this is crude and basic, there is still a saving especially with the fuel prices today. Of course you'll have to put into account things like amount of time usage, as that battery will eventually run out at the draw required to run the system. You'll probably find that the battery won't last as long as the water. So to run it longer, more/bigger batteries.
Thanks for showing us. Now we can become truly free independent people. We make our own electricity for light and heat and fuel and can also grow our own food, including green fodder, fish and rabbits. We can create our private workshop and iron foundry, etc., etc.
wow... amazing 😝😝😝 engine is stable and runs well on gas ⛽...