Judge Literally LAUGHS In Sovereign Citizen's Face IN COURT... PRO SE FAIL!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 сен 2024
- Hey guys, today we have a new video for your enjoyment. Today, we have a judge who has a genuine laugh at a sovereign citizen's paperwork in court. This is just another example of Karens being Karens in court and getting owned on camera.
To Support The Channel :
Europe Trip Fund : paypal.me/Team...
Become A Channel Member : / @teamskeptic
Join Our Patreon : / teamskeptic
TeeSpring - teespring.com/...
#Court #CourtCam #TeamSkeptic
I love how we want to be a Sovereign Nation yet we make fun of those who want to be a sovereign citizen. This judge is kinda rude IMHO, you have the right to defend yourself, yet chastise this guy. Criminal or not.
Supreme Court says you have the right to travel and traveling and driving are two different things, car is included in traveling. This judge is conflating insurance and traveling 🤦. WTF apples and oranges good grief....Just like they say cops don't have to actually protect you.
Where is this judges robe?
Where in the 2A is a but
Have your ducks in a row if this is the path you chose but this judge is wrong a car is included in traveling. I know a guy that is successfully traveling without anything this judge claims he knows as a privilege which is an actual right. Once again have your ducks in a row.
A Sovereign Nation cannot exist with Sovereign Citizens. Do you not see the irony of your statement? And yes, you can travel anywhere you want(almost) and you can do so in a car, all you want... but you cannot do so behind the wheel of a car any more than you can do so behind the controls of an airplane without proper licensing. If you can find the Supreme Court case(state or federal) that specifically states that drivers licenses are unconstitutional, I'll admit I am wrong... I'll wait. Until then, take advice from the rest of the audience as you get the pin of shame.
🤣🤣
@@TeamSkeptic thank you for that, I appreciate it.
YOU are the FOOL the Lincoln described.
@@TeamSkeptic The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." - Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.20 784.
“I like to be nice to people but I’m not taking you to school.” Now that’s not true judge, you are most definitely schooling this man.
he tried but it fell on deaf ears,, or was simply ignored.
It's not his job to be nice, his job is to make sure he gets a fair trial, unfortunately for him he takes that as weakness that will bite him in the ass
I think His Honor meant that he wasn't going to coach him during the trial.
@@FreyaTaitditto
It just occurred to me that this is the Faretta hearing.
And it's not just walking: a PASSENGER does not need a license to travel by car, bus, etc. But if you're behind the wheel, if you're operating the motor vehicle, then you need a DL.
It's the thumb finger law. Not all traveling(fingers) is driving(thumbs), but all driving is travelling
Basically, operating any mode of travel over 1.5hp needs a license.
Also, if a State put some unjustifiably restrictive requirements to a driving license, you could have a case that they are violating your right to travel. But you would have to show that those specific requirements are not justified and that they are too restrictive, simply having requirements is totally legal.
@@david-kc5hr Not necessarily 1.5mph. I walk about 2mph.
@@david-kc5hrBS. You can get a DUI in a car that isn't moving, it just has to be turned on
I've never seen a judge so happy to have a SovCit in their court.
Must have been his first lol
It has now arrived in his courtroom.
He should give lessons to other judges.
this defendant is somewhat well educated and articulate,, but at minute 45, which is where i'm at now, i get the sense that he wasn't listening or understanding anything the judge was saying. or more likely is that he did but is just stuck in that sovcit mode. what always cracks me up is that they never have a problem "travelling" public roads paid for with tax-payers' money,, tax payers who understand the reason for and the value of a driver license, insurance, and registration. i'm pretty sure the judge went above and beyond of what's required of him to try and help this knucklehead.
But it's the ultimate challenge. Teaching a Sovcit they actually don't know anything about the law is like teaching a cat to play the piano. It's not going to happen, but imagine if you did.
Let's Dr. Seuss this thing. You have the right to travel. You can travel on your feet. You can travel on a horse. You can travel in a boat. You can travel, yes of course. You can travel in a car, as long as you are not the one driving. You can travel underwater, that's called diving.
Boats may require licenses too.
@@jeremywalters8506 Not to mention it would then be covered by maritime law /s :)
It’s amazing that on September 11 2024 someone can make an ass of themselves in court and by September 12 it’s posted online for the world to see. What a time to be alive.
Yes that was surely quick!
Indeed.
Narcissistic Christians came a long way. It used to be when the Christians forced the religion on people only a few people heard it.
I was shocked, idiot didn’t even get home before this was on YT!.
We live in the future. It’s wild. 😂
Love technology and all its advancements!!
this judge really has a heart of gold. he says he doesn't have the time to send this person to law school, then takes every effort to school him on the law.
@@jphzzzz why should this guy have to go to law school, what's so hard about learning the Constitution and you're rights under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, The Constitution isn't a mystery that has to be interpreted to understand it, as the old saying goes it's as plain and the nose on your face, if the judge is claiming that no one without a law degree could possibly apply the law and assert their rights under the law then wouldn't it be true that you could claim ignorance of the law and basically walk out Scott free, but if you claim ignorance of the law the judge will simply tell you that you can't claim ignorance of the law, so which is it, is the law so complicated that a mear citizen couldn't apply or understand the law or is it true that the laws are simple enough for the common citizen to understand and apply the laws to protect their rights and accert their rights and be able to defend themselves and win their case, but wouldn't that stand the ones who started all this bull of being a lawyer to defend yourself, i bet that would put a lot of lawyers out of work, not to mention the notion that one has to acquire a license to apply ones trade/work ?
@@kavinbell4621 do you know where the punctuation keys are on your keyboard?
@@kavinbell4621
You said a lot without saying anything. Do you know the difference between the U.S. Constitution & all of the laws & processes involved enough to not only represent yourself, but to do it effectively enough to win? Risking representing oneself in a criminal proceeding is asking for failure.
@@GingerNinja1 so what your saying is that you have to hire a lawyer because your ignorant of the law, I've always heard ingnorance of the law is no excuse, so which is it it ? I believe that the founding fathers as they are referred to when it comes to the Constitution considered that not all individuals would be technically minded when it comes to defending one's self in a court preceding that's exactly why they made the Constitution so the common citizen could understand it and defend their rights, if that wasn't the case then if the laws and Constitution is so complicated and complex then it would be understandable that a person could claim ignorance of the law, but I'd be willing to say a judge would disagree with me on that point alone, as far as me babbling hey if you don't want to hear or read what I got to say well then you don't have to respond to my rambling, as for law's and processes I don't have much respect as I was in court for a friend of mine, he was a bit older than me and i was a teenager in highschool, he came over to talk and see what was going on because the police was at our house because we were having problems out of a nabor down the street, my friend simply ask me what was going on and of course i told him and that was the end of it, and we begin talking about something else and i said something to him that was funny and so he started laughing then all of a sudden the cop started saying you think its funny you think its funny, we tried to explain that what we were talking about had nothing to do with what was going on with the situation with the neighbors but he wasn't going to accept that for an ancer and arrested my friend for no reason but for laughing and during court preceding I was called as a witness but the judge wasn't going to hear what I had to say so my friend got convicted on a bogus charge so forgive me if I don't think much of our judicial system and the ones that are supposed to protect our rights but instead violate them because they claim that they know what the law is and yet they do everything in their power to use our laws against us, as i have stated that the right to travel encompasses the means of conveyance which in the past was horse or horse and buggy and today it's the automobile there's no difference in mode of travel with the exception of the automobile which is a modern form of conveyance but still a form of traveling in which is a right not a privilege.
@@GingerNinja1 if I said a lot and was saying nothing then why did you respond to what I said evidently you understood something about what I was saying or you wouldn't have responded lol
When a judge says “I’ve been watering for something like this for so long, this is so much fun,” you’re fucked.
Lmao right??? Like if the judge even hints that they are torch you you stfu
Watering eh? Forget "waiting" it seems..
Hahahahahahaha!
This young man has been let down badly. He has been given a box of chipmunks by his friends and told that he has the keys to the magic kingdom.
He is facing a charge of possession of a gun illegally and so far he's just rambling about not needing a license and insurance to drive and how his weed was bought legally
Imagine having to deal with this nonsense on the regular
That poor man needs to find him different people to associate with.... They have fed his mind with all sorts of shit
100% chance he will lose.
This judge is firm but fair.
In another video, he warned a 2 time DUI defendant on what would happen on the 3rd offence. Being passed around in prison was one of the warnings.
Yes! That was epic indeed.
And His Honor cried when he read about the things that happen in prison.
@@FreyaTait Anal therapy
This jugde is just nicer than the rest, but far from fair.
I love how this Judge shows you don't have to be mean to be firm. He's so kind, and yet immovable. He would be an amazing dad/teacher
@@fiveminutestolive He has four children, and I'm sure he is an amazing dad.
He is, and the trolls are attacking him and kids on his Facebook 😢
@@FreyaTait You can drink the milk or you can choose not to drink the milk. Just know if you don't drink the milk, there is no cookie later.
@@Asmith444well I’m sure this judge has a lot more respect and money than the trolls do lol.
@@Asmith444 Ya if I was a judge my kids wouldn't have social media but trolls atttack me on the internet and I literally do not care.
If the court doesn’t have jurisdiction, where are you going to sue the officers?
Good one
Exactly!!!
You’re being to smart
😂😂😂 why do you gotta be so reasonable? Stop making sense; they don’t get that! lol😂
But that’s not fair❣️🤣😂🤦♀️
Update* This driver was arrested leaving the court house. He decided to drive away. You can't make this stuff up! SMH
Really!? Omg what a maroooon
No way.
“You can take your two feet and walk your happy ass from point A to B.” Love it!! ❤
He even has the right to travel in a car. He just can't be the one moving the steering wheel and the pedals.
Using his happy-go-lucky feet.
@@BobBlumenfeld lol...exactly.
I bet he “traveled” to court, and is gonna violate in about 30 seconds
Or take the Dodge Patas!😆😆
“Abraham Lincoln?”
“I never met him”
Did you ?
@teresavogt5977 are you really this dense?
I havent either but i know what made him a great president.
😂
This judge is respectful to the defendant and also doesn't take any of his BS at the same time. That is how it should be done.
❤
You call that behavior respectful? He comes across as a goofy, pompous idiot.
I agree with you
Complete learning disability
@@drexrew he's a clown and should be removed from the bench.
This is how every judge should be dealing with sovereign citizens. He is the first one that actually said you have a right to travel by foot but you cannot get behind the wheel of an automobile. Thank you, Judge finally, you have explained the way i’ve always wanted judges to do. I love it. Also if you think we don’t have jurisdiction then go ahead and leave see what happens. Lol. He’s my new favorite Judge.
Okay Hitler
"I'll make your bond so high your head will spontaneously combust" - Thanks judge, I'll mop the coffee off the keyboard as soon as I finish this comment!
😂😅😂😅
Same 😂😂😂
@@Sgt_Bill_T_Co (6) Motor vehicle.-
The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
And they don’t care to ruin peoples lives further? Shows WHAT judges really are.
@@generalleigh7387 as long a judge is comfy and secure he could care less about human rights.
Judge was actually really nice and explanatory. He displayed more than a normal amount of patience with this suspect.
Seriously, some people saying he was mocking him for representing himself when he was actually trying to save him from digging a bigger hole.
This defendant is barely vocal.
Perp
Judge Fleischer is trying so hard to save the,so citizen from his own hubris and ignorance!
His oath and education imply 'nice'. All others is misusage of the power position.
This is the first Judge that actually explained to the Sovereign citizen how the Law works, and is Governing state to state, and that right to travel means walking on your own two feet, not driving a Vehicle. Love it. 👍👌💯
Forest sitting in the passenger seat
True. But it’s like showing a cocker spaniel a magic trick. You can explain it all you want but they’re still not going to get it.
I think the right to travel just meant no one can stop you from going from state to state. Not how you got there. Train, car etc.
@@kirielbranson4843 you are wrong.
@jbarnes705 what do you think it means?
I LOVE THIS JUDGE! He cuts through all the cr*p and holds people accountable!
Not to mention, if the right to travel includes by means of any vehicle, then, no pilot's licence, no rotary wing licence, no hot air balloon licence, no train driving licence. No need to get a special licence for an HGV.
And, of course, it's only the US that has the US constitution, and yet, every other country issues licences, coincidence? Or are they all in on it? The level of moronitude with these skeevs is flambouyant and outlandish.
No need for legal age or competency either :D
A child could drive a sports car to buy sweets.
ok ok, but have you considered: maybe there’s a magic set of words that nobody knows about, but it automagically gets you out of trouble??
haha jk
And how about those idiots in other countries like Canada or Australia who quote the U.S. Constitution when arguing their BS to the police. As dumb as they come.
What about a captain's license, ya know, for cruise, cargo, and tanker ships...?!?
We will be taking off shortly. Your pilot has found the correct chapter in "flying for dummies" and we thank you for flying SovCit Airlines.
My favorite part: "I'm only asking you to follow the law. I'm not asking you to split the atom."
I love Judge Fleischer for soooo many reasons
@@lishal1625 the law.
(6) Motor vehicle.-
The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
@@Dallasl_andscaping_. That's Texas I presume? I know some states specifically exclude electric motors under a certain size or incapable of propelling a vehicle over a certain speed. Some states do not though, and I do recall seeing at least one video where a young lady was arrested for DWI while riding one of those electric scooters you can buy for less than $300 at Walmart.
@Dallasl_andscaping_.
Let me guess, using the Blacks Law book? The judge already addressed this earlier at the beginning of the video.
@@Dallasl_andscaping_.you’re just so wrong. No matter how you present it.
@@Doggonewood that’s fine. Show how I’m wrong. If you can’t that’s fine also. Not many people know their rights and follow rather than lead.
I love this judge. He gives “slightly nerdy, trying-to-be-cool dad who just wants you to LISTEN, ffs” energy.
I miss his bowtie...! Where's the bow tie...?!?
Excellent description!
He is the Ultimate Cool!
Yes.
True true but he does lay it out pretty daaaamn unequivocally clearly....doofus KNOWS what he's been told.
I love this judge. He's a good guy. He tried to help this man as much as he could.
When the judge laughs and say he’s been waiting for one of these cases you know you are in trouble and better lawyer up. But then again these Sov-Cits just can’t understand and lose every time!
Yeah that should have been a big clue this was going to go very poorly lol.
The judge is being unprofessional honestly. I'd have higher expectations. I'd like to see this guy stow the snarky remarks for his golf course chitchat and focus on the process on the clock.
@@CorporateG0thplease, tell us more about how you're a criminal and now you're salty at the law system
The only problem when the judge listed all the things he could lose if he killed someone without insurance, is that this dude will never have any of those things TO lose, and prison jobs pay less than 50 cents an hour.
@@CorporateG0th🙄 Heaven forbid a government official not be a soulless, miserable carbon copy.
This video is the perfect example of what the saying "you can bring a horse to water, but you can't force it to drink" means
He drove to court and hes going to drive home and will continue to drive.
Maybe we will see his bond revocation hearing. 😉😜
No no, he doesn't drive... he travels 😂
@@skinsey85 Travels straight into a Jail cell...
One can only hope. Lol
Little do you know that he hast inflated His tires Not with Air but water. Therefore he ist operating His vesesl one water which means he ist No longer to be refered to as a Driver but as Captain.
I was kinda hoping we would see the judge tell an officer to follow him out and see if he got into the driver’s seat…
"Travelling" is moving from one place to another. "Driving" is operating a motorized vehicle, regardless if it is moving or not. You have the right to travel without paperwork. You do NOT have the right to drive without license, registration, and insurance.
He was not driving. He merely occupied the front left seat of a motor vehicle that was in motion. He is a traveling front left seat passenger not a driver.
@@ReeseL4D in a British or Japanese car that would be valid, but as soon as he is the interface between the seat and the controls of the car he is driving.
That may be one of the finest examples of a judge that I have ever seen. His disposition, his professionalism and his overall control and compassion. Amazing judge who takes pride in his work.
I have never seen a person who wants people to succeed as much as this judge.
She was going to let her slide just by what the defendant said.
Concurred fully.
@@terriedotson7323seems like the judge is a defense attorney who walked into the court and decided to take the seat for himself but forgot to change his clothes. He’s snarky, one sided, bias, mockery making laughing judge. He might as well stop the bias and say “ boy you’re guilty just shut up”.
Heavy bias from this judge.
@blackleague212
Naw, man. You're looking at it from a victims point of view rather than from an objective point of view. The judge gave the defendant more opportunities than I've ever seen any judge give. The defendant thought he knew better. The judge tried breaking things down barney style, and the defendant responded with inaccurate information. So, the judge broke it down even further to help the defendant understand, and you think *that* shows his bias? If he was mocking the defendant, he would've used normal legal jargon. But it's clear the defendant doesn't understand legal jargon. If he was showing his bias, he wouldn't have spent so long, not only ensuring the defendant was of sound mind, but repeatedly trying to convince him that going pro se means he's going to be held to the same standards as every other attorney. If he was going to make racial remarks, like you've insinuated, do you really think he'd waste the amount of time it took to try and help the defendant? No, he would've endured he's capable, explained the provisions of his bond, denied his requests, and moved on. The fact that you can't see how far this judge bent over backwards shows there's a problem with you perception rather than the judges behavior.
By first glance this judge seems nerdy and awkward…but he is the coolest, smartest, sharpest dude. His nerdy-ness is what makes him so savage. Love this judge
i am trying to figure out his age, other than the balding i'd think 35 but some of the cadence in his speech screams silent generation, but this guy is roasting the defendant with some pretty sharp points. It's like an AND1 mixtape of court
@@ErikWidmann big facts. You describe him perfectly. It is perplexing as he looks young but man he comes through with that old man “I’ve seen some ish” vibe. I really like him.
For the record: It is not the United States of Texas, it is the State of Texas. The Tenth Amendment allows the state to regulate intrastate motor vehicle usage.
I find it a touch frustrating that so many judges and cops never bother to explain that to sovcits. Sure, odds are they won't listen but it's worth it if you can sway one back to normalcy.
@@Blasted2Oblivion It is not their job to educate people.
@@Sadiregu1619 It may not be their job but, if I see someone about to make a life altering mistake, I am going to try to warn them.
@@Blasted2Oblivion Okay, that's you. Become a cop or judge, then.
@@Blasted2Oblivionin order to be swayed BACK to normalcy, one must first BE normal.
I've never seen a public servant with this much patience and kindness. I wish more Americans were like him.
Sovs don't want to Win. They want to Delay and Delay more.
Exactly they feel like if they delay cases will be dismissed.
They see trump getting away with it sooo . These sov cits are trumps base.
And all they do is tie up the court system.
He will do jail time
You boys need to study more ....
Colonial Law trumps Maritime law ...
That where he's going..
Did you not he's Black ..
That means he's a registered Moorish citizen ..
Which is recognized under
Federal law..
This get tricky
Colin did an interview with Judge Fleischer and he said he hasn't had many sov cits so u can see why he was so excited to play with this fool!!!
He had that "treason" guy that Mike of Law Talk with Mike like to clip out a lot.
@@UnchainedAmerica oh yeah!! I forgot about that!!
He also did the best job of it, short of just ignoring the sov-cit's garbage and barrelling ahead with the procedure as some judges do.
When I visited the Judge's court, it was mostly people who weren't citizens at all both days, or hardcore banger types that are too caught up in street stuff to throw out the sovcit vibes.
He is a fool no doubt but so was this judge he was acting out of his realm he lied to the kid even if caught driving it’s only so much he could do he can’t give the kid an astronomical amount of bail that’s against the law so in essence he LIED plain and simple
“‘Alleged’ is not even spelled correctly.”
Judge Fleischer, I love you.
He's a great man, a great example. They say never meet your heroes, but I met this Judge in his court and it was nothing short of, to overuse the term, great.
You can see the people in the back holding back laughter when he says that lmao
I burst out laughing when he said that.
Considering the sovcit ate all the crayons, I'm not surprised in the least
@@LaRossaSelvaggia (6) Motor vehicle.-
The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
This guy received more education in 30 minutes from that judge than he ever had in his life. Public school absolutely failed this young man, if he even went.
It's not the schools fault. Stupid is as Stupid does.
"What bonds are you talking about, James Bonds?" LMAO 😂
Covalent and Ionic bonds, of course.
@@justinclloyd
Surely, what other bonds could he mean?
Double-naught spy
Bail bond is more like it!😅
that was freaking awesome...😂
When he says he has represented himself MANY TIMES! That is nothing to brag about!🙄
it was funny too that his many times was = once and it was something the court passed on because there wasn't enough evidence. so his many times was actually zero
truly an alarming statement
In reality, this guy's a career criminal & using the sov cit bs to legitimize his criminal behavior & continue walking around free. Creep!!
This is the kind of judge we need all over the United States. I get so frustrating watching these weak judges let sovereign citizens and other miscreants get away with crap.
Weve got one , his name is Judge Oakley
Yeah we desperately need judges like him everywhere. Unfortunately a lot of judges get the position because they specifically advertise themselves as judges who will do everything in their power to keep criminals out of incarceration. You got a son or brother or uncle or whoever that's incarcerated? If I'm judge or DA or whatever elected judicial position, I'll do everything I can to set them free.
I wish there were something that could be done about this, but as long as there is a demand for elected officials to be as morally corrupt as possible, that's what we'll get. Voters have to start requiring moral and ethical sanity from elected officials
The issue is that central to sov cit practices is a rhetorical technique called “Gish galloping” whereby they attempt to overwhelm their opponent with an excessive number of arguments with no regard for their accuracy or strength.
It’s a tactic that is very deliberately designed to be disorienting and overwhelm the Court such that the Court is unable to address all of their nonsense arguments in the alloted time.
I think any judge unfamiliar with sov cit arguments would be reasonably frustrated or overwhelmed with the legal doo doo getting thrown around the room.
Judge Fleischer is just prepared. He clearly did his research on these people are knows which of their arguments to ignore and which to focus on to avoid derailing the hearing. (Notice how he chuckled at the Dun & Bradstreet blurb but otherwise just ignored it. He knows that is based on some spurious conspiracy theory that the United States is using its citizens as collateral against loans to shadowy foreign investors… there’s no need to address any of that malarkey for a case concerning misdemeanor driving and firearms infractions)
Probably Judge Judy can shake this sovcit up as well. She is probably a good parent as well.
@@finchvalor I really do have to ask... do you actually believe "as morally corrupt as possible" is what the voters demand? Have you never considered you just don't understand their morality, instead?
i can’t get over the fact that the guy can’t name a single president. but he insists on defending himself in a case where he can go to jail. amazing ignorance, just amazing
Expecting a career criminal to understand liability for the consequences of a car accident is wonderfully optimistic.
He didn't sign the document, and should have been sent straight to jail with an added charge of contempt of court.
Yeah, but he is on the record stating that is his signature.
I could write down the first line of "The saga begins" by Weird Al on that line, but if a judge asks on the record if that is my signature and I ignorantly say yes, well the judge just hung me up by my boot straps.
As far as I understand, if you sign something, it doesn’t matter what your signature looks like or says, it becomes a legal signature that they can hold you to. So I can’t go back later and argue that the squiggle I scribbled down looks nothing like my name. (I’ve been told it’s the same even for people who sign their name as “Daffy Duck” or what have you).
He's not a criminal if he doesn't recognize any authority, I guess?
@@chinkasuyaro8983 He recognized enough of the court’s authority not to try to leave when the judge challenged him on that though 🤭
The signature is entirely irrelevant.
Hes out on bond. The terms of that bond have been set by the court. Violation of that bond means you go back to jail. Having him sign a piece of paper that lists the terms of the bond isn't really necessary, just standard practice.
So yes, the judge can "hold him to the agreement," no matter what he scrawls across that line, but only because he already has the power to do whatever he wants to do anyway.
“If you don’t believe we have jurisdiction over you then leave”.
Meanwhile Steve casually shifts over to block the exit.
That made me laugh 😂
Lol. 90% of me was pulling for him to turn and go to see the ensuing result. 10% was my realization this fool knows what's up and didn't have the balls to test it.
@@toxman69 Well, no. He's an idiot bamboozled by Internet grifters. They never win. Because their legal theories are false.
I saw that. That was funny af
Since Nov 2015, I have learned a lot of citizens are beyond idiots.
Judge: ‘then lave!’ Steve: ‘Go ahead punk, make my day!’ 😂
Legal experience? Yeah I have legal experience- “I’ve been a defendant many,many times”
LOL
@@smsshadoan he watched a bunch of RUclips videos so now he can be his own lawyer no. Wait he is the authorized representative and trustee to the defendant. But he only did that after everything else failed
Yeah, that’s not the flex he thinks it is.
He watched 2 episodes of Ironsides and now he’s a Lawyer!🤡
Yeah, I'm a professional criminal. No college required!! 😅😂
This guy is a criminal, lock him up. Then give him an education.
I am waiting for a judge to point out that the right to travel was granted before automobiles were invented.
Same here. At least this one suggested the use of feet as a means to travel. I've been waiting a long time to hear that!
@@anthonyperham1417 Or ask them if they are allowed to just fly a plane or helo anywhere and everywhere they want without consequence because of their right to travel.
So… there’s this thing called precedent
Oh thank God for people who are intelligent enough to actually go and read shit and find it out for themselves reading through this thread their makes you lose hope in our damn country and makes you realize just how bad our education system really is
When Fleischer laughed and said he'd been waiting for a case like this, I burst out laughing and had to pause the video for a minute. I love that Fleisher told the guy that if he didn't think the court had jurisdiction over him, he should just leave. Of course he didn't leave. Fleischer is so great.
And revealed in the process is propensity for nudity at home
This SovCit was more respectful than many SovCits are. He didn’t interrupt and talk over the Judge. However, you know just by nature of how he signed the agreement not to drive and claimed doing so, “reserves all his rights,” that he’s going to walk right out of that courtroom and drive off in a car. He thinks by signing that paper with gibberish he maintains what he thinks is his “right” to travel, despite the Judge having very clearly defined the difference between the right to travel and the privilege of operating a motor vehicle. The Judge should’ve quietly had an officer follow him out to the parking lot and, if he got into the driver’s seat of a car, yank him right back into court before the judge.
Another thing I like about how Judge Fleischer handled this particular case, was that he explained the Tenth Amendment and how the States, Texas, and he, has jurisdiction even before the session got too far underway. And then to reiterate the point by telling him that he wouldn’t be there if he knew, or truly believed, the Court has no jurisdiction over him. This was just an excellent example of how the SovCit idiots should be handled and how to shut them down before they can even get to their usual contemptible behavior.
i am hoping he does travel and his next judge is Judge Oakley..he has experience with SovCits lol
Your probably right. And he’ll end up in jail a crewing days that can be used to reduce the time he’s sentenced to in the case he’s about to lose
He dealt with an obnoxious one, and promptly sent him to jail.
@@MickeyMouseParkHe eats them for breakfast.
I don't think, I could b wrong, but I don't believe they know, this law is on the books, BUT the fed govt ruled that it would b relegated to the individual states & they all adhere to their respective driving laws. Lic, ins. registration, ect ect. If they did this sov cit bs would not exist.
This is the MOST practical and reasonable a judge I have ever seen. The Judge took the time to evaluate this dude's ability to represent himself and it turned into proof he cannot, AND he incriminated himself.
I love hearing the judge say "I don't care if I offend you or make you mad"
This judge is a good person. He tries so hard to educate the defended… but one can’t fix a narcissistic stupid person.
Nobody can!
he's the only reason I feel safe traveling to Houston and spending my money on the local economy there. I feel like even if I were to be caught up as a crime victim (God forbid), folks who care would have my back afterward.
I love this judge, but after saying he would provide no instruction he did nothing but, and wasted A LOT of time!
@@mja91352 I found it fascinating and quite engaging...not 'a waste of time'....
@@mja91352 he said he tries to be nice but this isn't a school so yes he WILL help but hes only gonna go so far. He does overdo it at one point and the one guy calls him out on it.
Lmfao. I’m disappointed he’s wearing a full tie today. I much prefer the bow ties. At any rate, I died when he chuckled and said “I’ve been waiting for this for so long” lmao as soon as he heard common law he smiled. That’s golden
He looks like a gameshow host , but Judges like a badass
His suit is sharp as hell
Back in the 70s I was a filthy hippie. Arrested for Minor in the presence of Alcoholic beverages. Figured I'd represent myself as I felt just being in a building where someone else who I didn't even know had beer would be easy to get thrown out. In walks the Judge, crew cut, scowl and he only had 1 arm. I immediately told the court I needed a lawyer.
Years ago, I was a correctional officer in a federal prison. About 10% drink the kool-aide and listen to their friends 'other inmates'. They try the sovCit route. It doesn't end well. It gives us a reason to laugh.
I am actually impressed with how professional everybody is being in the face of this ridiculousness
It broke up the monotony.
Everyone is calmly sitting back waiting to enjoy the numerous punchlines
I appreciate that this honorable judge protects the community. Great judge!
Intelligence and confidence doesn’t usually replace education and experience. Seek legal advice on legal issues.
The only issue with this whole thing is that Judge DIDN’T ask how he was getting home.
Or how he got to court.
By the Tardis.
Haha did you hear that judge talking to him. The judge knows, what the judge is trying to see is if he actually has the balls to do it haha. Actually about to go search to see if he already got picked up.
Well? LoL @@user-yb5dg8vq6r
Middleton looks at the video
They should of followed him out to the parking lot and arrested him for driving as soon as he got in his car. You know he did.
"Should HAVE not should of".
@@laurastuart3814 You have no jurisdiction over my tenuous grasp of the English language.
If you look closely a cop did fallowing him out of the court room at the least.
You know he def got behind the wheel of his conveyance 😅😂
Yeah, he is selling clothes and other things he was able to steal.
You got that right!!!
Indeed
He's selling the weed and not doing it well.
That was my first thought
Yes, that's what I'm thinking, too.
He just filed a bunch of BS to try and have a judge who don’t want deal with all that just drop the charges. That’s funny
I always told my kids that they could be the best driver on the planet, but you have no control over the other drivers around you.
My mom use to say it's not your driving that you have to worry about. It's the other idiots you have to worry about. And I still say that
My advice to my son was always assume the other drivers are idiots. It's sad how often they prove you right.
@@rssphllps That mindset has saved me from several accidents
I mean, defensive driving is all about being so much better than the idiots that they don't affect you, even if they do be idiots.
Take defensive driving school classes. You and the driving schools teach you how to drive and watch what others are doing around you.
I bet he's driving, oops, traveling right now.
He's a front left seat passenger. Why is that so hard to understand?
The judge pointed out that liability insurance protects anyone he might injure; his reply was that he knew he could get sued. He said nothing about how any victim would be protected.
Bc he doesn't give a damn about others.
Sov cit's are a more extreme version of the callousness that seems baked into American discourse... Now suddenly asking people to realise they affect others, but all they can see is the impact on themselves
That’s sovcit thinking. They don’t care about the common good. They’re only concerned with what benefits them.
How about all the policyholders that have to pay extra premiums because of people like HIM who don't have coverage.
“I have a right to travel!”
So, what’s stopping me from “traveling” my truck through your living room wall? 14th amendment says I have a right to travel and it doesn’t specify I can’t drive through your house!
Damn you discovered a glitch in the system!
There are laws against the destruction of property. Give it a try and let us know how it goes.
@@kathymc234 no ur wrong... it's a glitch
So, how did the SovShit get home from the hearing? Bet he walked right out to the parking lot, got into his car, and drove off.
I saw another video recently, not sure how old, where the defendent had a suspended license and was in his court appearance via Zoom *while driving to the courthouse*.
@@justinclloyd If that's Judge Simpson, it turned out the guy didn't even have a suspended license. He had never, ever applied for one his whole life. 😛
@@conscientiousobserver8772 Yep, just found it and I had the detail wrong, he was arriving at his doctor's office. It's Corey Harris.
@@justinclloyd you had the detail right, as reported at the time of the video. But then the defendant went on a tv news report and made statements about being a victim because his licence had been reinstated and Judge simpson made it a mission to find out all the details. The next time the defendant was infront of the judge, the judge took the time to lay out all the details of how his diving "priviledges" had been revoked for i believe unpaid child support. meaning the ability to have a license was revoked but the law changed and his priviledge was reinstated. Not his license reinstated just his ability to get a license. and the judge went on to say in the state of michigan you can either have a michigan I.D. or you have a michigan drivers license. and the week he claimed he could not be in court to face charges due to a car accident. the judge found out he was at the state office getting his Michigan I.D. Renewed and had a Michigan I.D. every year since he turn 18. so Judge made it clear this man who was driving during a zoom court date was illegally driving and had never had a license.
To this guy's credit, he was at least more civil with the judge than a lot of the others we've seen on this channel. He wasn't constantly interrupting the judge and he was never really in danager of being held in contempt of court. Sure, the guy isn't exactly intelligent. But he at least was reasonably well behaved in court.
"I re-sell clothing" = "I steal stuff from legitimate stores and sell it to the place in town that sells stolen property."
This judge gave him every opportunity and explained everything very well!
MANY times, yet he still didn't get it or believe the Judge meant what he said, ALL OF IT!! 😊
The way the judge kept his composure and maintained his professionalism is beyond me.
Not only did he have a ball, he made a sovcidiot sign a contract. ❤
A contract that he will promptly break because he feels that it is made under duress.
He is wrong however.
@@ken481959 your statement is an example of the failure of the American school systems go pick up a legal book read about the right to travel and the fact that it actually was given to the people before cars were even made and that driving is actually an illegal book If you ever read it actually is a commercial act that's the definition you should probably go look it up before you ever open your mouth
I’m a retired Palm Beach County Prosecutor and Judge and I can tell you I really did not like to deal with these so-called sovereign citizens because all they do is to clog up the works wasting everybody’s time. But this Judge acts unprofessionally and somewhat idiotically. He is being recorded prejudging this Defendant. This type of behavior gets cases overturned on appeal which wastes the time and resources of all involved.
These kinds of hearings give the Texas judges the right to refuse to let a defendant represent himself. Cuts down on the "I don't understand" crap.
Court should be in plain English and not legalese.
@@noble_norse7786that's why you need a lawyer! And legal terminology is needed because there has to be a standard across the board to avoid misunderstandings
@@katl6426 Do words not mean things? What's to misunderstand? And you're talking to a 30 year Constitutional law Scholar!
@@katl6426 legalese is only used to "interpret" law, so the state can get the ruling that they want and there is no justice in that method, as the "laws left open for interpretation" benefits the state and the state only.
@@noble_norse7786 my sweet summer child, you clearly need to grow up 😂
I lead a team of professional hackers.
I graduated as a biotechnologist.
Both disciplines use the word "encode" but the word has different meanings in each context.
That's just one example.
This is why whenever humans do something specialised, they use discipline-specific definitions for words.
You can have a tantrum about iT's sO uNfAiR: no-one can stop you - but all functioning adults will laugh at you, and probably dismiss everything you say thereafter.
Judge Fliescher is usually over the top in his behavior but i appreciate the way he handled this. Especially when the guy asked if he needed to take it to a higher court for review and Judge said "you certainly can...you can do whatever you want in life until someone tells no Appellatecourts need jobs too"😂
That was such a classic answer too
I saw a case where the defendant asked the appellate court if the CP he was convicted of met the definition of "erotic". In a deposition, he said that he had them for erotic purposes. They denied the appeal.
Appeals courts need jobs, like saying that the thing you eroticize is in fact erotic.
The reason you need a license to drive a car is the same for needing a license to fly an airplane. You need to show you know how to do it safely and correctly or someone is going to get killed.
This judge is severely bias and behaves as a juvenile; openly mocking a defendent is the best way to provide ammo for an appeal.
Get rid of these advocate "judges" 🧐 🧐
He's so amazing isn't he?
When he giggles and said he’s been waiting for a sovereign for so long you knew the dude was smoked 😂😂😂 7:29
Love this judge! Reasonable and fair almost to a fault. Regardless what we think about this case, our freedom is in good hands with him.
He was big-mad and I can tell because if he thought he got over he’d have STROLLED out, but since he lost (and couldn’t figure an excuse to not sign AND stay free, regardless of “how smart” he believes himself to be lol), and rushed out before he lost control of his anger; it’s the exact same way pre-pubescent children do.
😂😂😂😂😂
He is correct and wrong, you do not need a drivers license or insurance if you drive on nothing but private roads. However once you drive on public roads you are required to obey the rules of whomever owns that road. Usually city or state but the city uses the states rules.
Right to travel only applies to walking and sometimes(situations vary) horse travel. Once you r in a form of conveyance u obey the laws of the roads owner.
😂 "... if you don't think we have jurisdiction over you, then leave". This video should be shown in Judge's School on how to immediately shut down these clowns 🤡
You’re the clown who sings the anthem thinking he is free…these guys are at least trying, instead of being in denial.
I can see why you like this judge. Honest, open and direct.
Honest??
The judge is the epitome of a corrupt judiciary.
@@raworthyel3786dude looks like he takes off his Kippah before he sits on the judge seat. He reminds me of a shrewd dude from
The diamond district here in New York. When the judge said “James bonds” I almost slapped my phone screen. He’s trashy but entertaining.
The judge was being condescending the entire time instead of understanding his situation while the guy was being polite the entire time. Trashy judge.
@@blackleague212 Soooo, you don't believe in the First Amendment? The Very first thing that the 1st Amendment PROTECTS is freedom of Religion!
This judge needs to start giving classes to other judges on how to deal with sovereign citizens. This is genius. He’s not arguing with him, he’s not demeaning him, he’s just telling it how it is. Brilliant
If you are present in the United States, and are on US soil, you are subject to the laws of the land. Sovereign citizen or not.
You can walk your happy ass anywhere you want 🤣🤣🤣
His apparent legal strategy is to frustrate the court so much that they just tell him to go away and never come back. It's not working this time.
😂😂😂
When a court tells people to go away and never come back, people usually go to prison after that.
I think that’s giving him far too much credit. He believes in SovCit.
If people like this guy that gives anyone that actually reads a law book A Bad Name honestly because a lot of the stuff is actually in there but you are not going to be given any of this information you have to go and learn on your own and if you're one of those people who for some reason can't go and learn things to yourself and then actually put them into practice then like the law says it is entirely your fault because on the books ignorance of the law is no excuse just because it you decided not to go and learn how to read legalese does it mean what's in those books is wrong it just means you don't know
this judge is great... respectful yet strict...
great balance
They walk among us. They've caught one on camera. SMH.
If the judge spends that much time telling you that you need a lawyer, YOU NEED A LAWYER!!
He gave him a million opportunities to make the right decision. The boy ain't right.
@@ericmikutamaybe he wants to go to the jail… it’s mad cute bros in there and some men feel free there. It’s beautiful, sweaty and rather delicious. 😋
@@blackleague212 🤢
Hes going to jail, sooner, being stopped again DRIVING or later, after his trial!! 😊
Love this judge!! He is firm but making his point kindly. The judicial system needs more judges like him.
Yeah I like him but whats up with the suit? In American culture a judge wears a robe. Idk whats up with that.
@GuyFromTheSouth when you have a wardrobe like this judge why wear a robe? 😅 Every jurisdiction is different and allows judges to wear different colored robes also...
Ha. When he said "I've been waiting for this for so long", I grabbed my popcorn 🙂
Judge David needs a reality check. Thank god his license is in question.
As an elementary teacher, I lovvvve the way Judge is able to simplify concepts to explain them. Many super smart people are unable to simplify complex concepts to that level.
The judge’s demeanor went from friendly neighborhood defense attorney to godfather really fucking quick at the end and I’m all for it.
The most frustrating thing for me with people like this, is their total disregard for other people. The only part of the Judge's speech about the problems caused by not being insured he focused on was the part about him going to jail. He couldn't care less about not being able to help someone in the case he caused an accident.
Judge said it: you’re watching out for YOU! I’m watching out for all of Harris County!
That’s how sovcits operate. They only care about themselves.
Good observation!
Excuse me, didn’t you hear him when he talked about a hypothetical scenario of a car accident that this defendant caused and what that means ?? What happens because of no insurance ? Wanting to protect everyone in Harris county. The Judge went over it twice.
@@OldWomanfromtheMountains Maybe you misunderstood, but I was talking about the DEFENDANT not caring about injuring others. The judge said it perfectly. This defendant doesn't care about getting sued because he owns nothing so anybody he injures will be out of luck and he does not care.
This guy is a hell of a Judge. He is firm yet understanding and compassionate. 99% of judges wouldn't have took the time to be that thorough with anybody.
If a judge grins at you like that, you might as well say I change my plea to guilty.
here is a easy way for them to know the difference between driving and traveling 1. driving is when YOU have control 2. travelling is when OTHERS have control.
That’s a good way to explain it!
It's like explaining nuclear physics to a 3rd grader.
Unless that 3rd grader is Sheldon Cooper. Then, he will explain it to you!
@@msaret4384 That's the least intelligent thing I've heard all day.
@@craigsarles8077 Who shit in your cereal this morning?
This guy tried the Darrell Brooks approach. “I don’t understand the nature of the charge”. These idiots never fail to entertain.
Grounds
@@stevehilliard1495 🤣🤣🤣 Somebody made a video of Brooks in court and every time he said grounds a picture of coffee grounds flashed across the screen. It was so funny.