Видео

Also how do I establish how much delay is necessary to apply to the vacuum circuit? thx

@@LYDN26 tighten in 3 equal stages up to a maximum torque of 129nm, it's the only info I have had access too and that's from 202 store so I do trust what they say

@@byronbaird7395 does yours have A/c or not? It's a little easier as you can get it from the top in no A/c versions, however I just used a spanner on mine it is very tight to get from the underside, but the biggest challenge will be the nut on the back side of the alternator it's a challenge to get back in place

@@MulishaTank it's just a eBay 2.5 inch round muffler with a twin square exit tip and standard tubular headers

@@tm5346 just like any car you get good ones and bad ones, this has been a good little car for the past 7 years, they're just not the easiest to work on, but there's not many cars you can pull the front off in like 15 mins. Just like smart cars they had limited space to work with, but the Peugeot prince engine is a flawed engine unfortunately prone to oil starvation issues and leaks, what fault codes do you have? If there is oil in either of the sensor plugs the sensor needs replacing nice easy job, most common oil leaks on these are vacuum pump, valve cover gasket, oil filter housing gasket (that's not a fun job) and the camshaft solenoid on the belt side of the engine. The water pumps are apparently difficult to do on these and I did it on this one in an hour and a half, I think the biggest thing is understanding how BMW designed these to be worked on but they are fun little cars.

Thank For responding! Excellent video thanks again!

Igg I've had mini for years I did buy used 2013 just the PCV belt and that's not the problem it was perfect! Idk I did oil change I did buy ox sensor I've watched videos code cleared I just freaked out when I got one I didn't order 2 oxygen sensors! Ugg I didn't see video until of course tooO late I I'm wondering if the it either this or a ring I'm hoping it's one of. Them oxygen sensor catalytic was the code thank you for your video! My Son's Mercedes caught on fire! I can't believe it lol 2017 smh so it could be worse we laughed thank goodness for insurance! Or it would be SAD!

@@angelaldacoaa from what I've seen you can fit these panels and lights the earlier model and the actual underbody stayed the same and quarters, there's a guy in Germany that did it I believe. But they are a great little cars 👍

@M-oneeleven-M111 yeah that was my theory now the only hard part is getting those panels and all that over here

@@angelaldacoaa True as I think the w204 has a different front end structure so it's not got the same bolt patterns, but there maybe away it's worth researching, I would quite like to do the conversion as I prefer the M111 engine to the M271.

@@M-oneeleven-M111I know i seen a video of one that says it was converted to the clc body uploaded by hristo kirov but not a video on how it was done. But it probly wont be possible for me since i cant even get my hands on body panels and all that

@@jamesallner1638 I did get it working almost exactly as the stock bypass Valve worked, it takes some setting up but by using the check valves to create one way flow and the boost controller to slow the flow of vacuum, the allows the bypass Valve to close slowly I think it was. Obviously with this being so long ago it's hard to remember exactly what I did, but this was a 51mm exhaust bypass valve, I did do a few videos on this project. Basically it offers no performance gain but I shared it more so for your exact situation, basically the bypass valve needs to operate smoothly and, I think it was open fast and close slowly, it it shuts too fast the ECU trips over itself. NDRmini got a BOV to work but I have never had such success with the standard management, however with a vacuum delay circuit one may work. I hope this helps 👍

@@M-oneeleven-M111 Thanks for your quick reply. It does help a lot. It's the same problem I am having with the BOV. Too much draw when you open the throttle causing the BOV to open when you want it to close, then suddenly closing when the compressor catches up giving the engine too much boost suddenly. I will see what I can do with the check valves and controller, but I think I will probably end up doing it your way. The BOV sounds horrible and low revs. 😆 And you fit the controller on the negative pressure side of the system? That's what I was thinking, full pressure on the positive side to keep the BOV closed and the controller on the negative to moderate the opening on part throttle.

@@neilcarroll4579 more often than not replacement is the only option unfortunately, to be fair this one's was a cheap enough fix. Granted it's not OE quality it was a good fit for the price.

@@caseyround I finally got a new oil filter cap for it after months of it not having one on it 🤣 now the AGM battery is dead and that ain't cheap 🤦😂

Don't I know it, and I have two to keep fixing....

personally it's quite hard to say I would sway towards the TCU tune, it's not that Ofgear isn't worth it, actually it's well worth it and awesome to have so much control, however it's very difficult to get set up right without knowing exactly what your doing and if you get it wrong it's your transmission that pays the price. with a TCU tune there's less likelihood of damage to the transmission but I have heard negative comments about harsh shifts from TCU tunes but either of these options will make the shifts feel harsher. but like I say ide lean towards a tune on a sort of stock configuration car.

@@BoostWorx you bored of seeing this yet 🤣, the algorithm does not yet favour it 🤦😆

@@BoostWorx I believe it's Peugeot's patented anti corrosion design 👍🤣

@@M-oneeleven-M111 "Spit and Kleenex" as Jeremy Clarkson says lol

@@BoostWorx 🤣😂🤣

Thank you 👍

@@BoostWorx it's a hard life bro 🤣

@@arrondedkaufman2260 2.8 M104s are more readily available, OM606 stroke is 84mm, this crankshaft is actually stamped 104 meaning it's a M104 3.2 crankshaft it was just fitted in a om606. From this time frame many of their engines shared components. The M102 rods are 145mm these are the same as what you would find in a standard m104 3.2 and m103, the standard M104 2.8 rods are actually M111 rods that measure 149mm, so to be able to swap the crankshaft shorter rods are required so that the piston doesn't hit the head. So basically it will just become a standard M104 3.2. The M104 3.0 is the ideal engine to start with though is slightly more difficult to work with electronically as it's basically a M103 bottom end with a updated head. The M104 3.0 has the strongest internals best pistons and also an ideal compression ratio for a turbo conversion compared to all other M104s, however they cost more to buy as they're more sought after than any other M104 excluding the AMG, brabus, and Carlsson variants. I hope that helps 👍