Видео

ОШИБКА в измерении Вселенной, чёрных дыр, темной энергии, .. Позвольте господа физики судить о всём этом по результату прямого на 84% опыту: В автобусе, в самолёте выполним опыт Майкельсона-Морли и определяя им прямолинейную скорость. - О таком опыте мечтал ещё Эйнштейн. Но мы возможно будем наблюдать постулаты "Свет это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов. Доминантные гравитационные поля управляют скоростью света в вакууме". Есть предложение на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной с фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 16000 метров при этом, не превышает параметры 0,4/0,4/0,4 метра и вес - 4кг.

Is the highest probability in a field the same as highest energy in a field (probability)?

Isnt me walking backwards still just accelerating forward from position? We never go backward or reverse.

Great video. This is a fascinating topic. I've watch a few videos exploring it and your explanation does a great job of making it feel intuitive.

Thank you. I've heard the biggest names in physics question whether or not we experience "now" in the quantum now or in the past. I think it is so self-evident that our meat bodies can only experience a now after whatever wave form collapse. The velocity of light brings reality to our sensory inputs but after that point, sound speeds carry the signals in our nerve fibers to the brain. And only in the brain (perhaps) is the fullest perception or experiencing of that original "now." So we can only experience that past, I would think. Hey Priyansh, succeed! Make sure to get a Patreon, maybe sell shirts or something. Succeed at this. We need your voice. (Maybe do some on JWST or UFO propulsion to get your numbers up).

This is such a great video. It always seemed to me that the reality of the uncertainty of properties at the quantum level, could undermine the eternalist block universe and its static theory when it comes to temporal passage. I am though interested in what your thoughts are on a radical theory of time (one which no one seems to literally defend). This model of time can be described as the “shrinking block theory.” This view would claim that both future and present moments/events, exist and are real, while the past does not exist and is unreal (it is similar to an inversion of the growing block theory). The block shrinks as each present moment disappears into the past.

Let's travel in time and going back to July 20 1,945 and located and bring to the present 2024 may 10.. the Mr A Hitler.. according to scrodinger equations he's dead already but before his death we capture the lieder and bring it back by.. if we return several times in time and bring it several Mr A Hitler's person's.. we are creating different UNIVERSES.. that's the reason why the UK monarchy and the Jewish Israeli GENOCIDAL NAZIS WORLDWIDE are against TIME travel... We can bring it anyone from the PAST and nobody else can do anything else about it..😮

Great work here this presentation is pretty damn impressive. Thanks!

what Malcolm said, this shit is well put together

Whatever you do, don’t stop doing this videos. You have untapped potential. Your video production and quality will only get better and better. Keep it up. See you in the future.

Thanks for making this video, ive tried to explain the block universe many times to people, this is a correct way to view the universe in my opinion at least, it also highlights our special place as beings that can so effectively affect change, its difficult for us to comprehend because we are outliers, we are macroscopic bodies that are created from tissues connected to the quantum realm, this has the effect of bringing the uncertainty of the very small to the large, especially prescient in our most important organ the brain, we even have the same questions about the quantum world and our thoughts without realizing it, do your thoughts exist if you never act on them? What if you dont remember them? Where are they? Why is that question so similar to finding the location of an electron? Anyway i subscribed these are my favorite topics to think about

If true we would exist eternally. We exist in the past present and future and when we die we just become an infant again and live the same life over and over. Eternal return.

Quantum mechanics simply expands a block of spacetime into a hilbert space collections of spacetime blocks. I think of it as a collection of DVDs each one represents a linesr spacetime observation

It has not many sense. Because this conception of reality derives from a "movement". If all reality is a ball moving, than you're right. But there are minds moving that ball and changing such "block of reality".

Thanks for the video, The Akashic Record is now being taken as plausible by quantum cosmologists, ie, infornation is never lost from the Universe,, and, in theory,it could be read eternally. Hawking black hole radiation tells us that even black holes keep the information they have swallowed and eventually dissipate it back into infinite space, as everything with a temperature, however close to absolute zero radiates.

Gravity is the result of space being both curved and also moving towards a mass.

👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🤯🤯🤯😮

Hello, I would suggest that there exists a much simpler explanation for gravity. Gravity has nothing to do with curvature of space, it is a a combination of two forces, Attraction and repulsion, and begins with the atom. There has just been published an alternative hypothesis to the standard model, called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ', by Tony Norman Marsh, which explains this and very much more. If you type Tony Norman Marsh into Google, details will be shown. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

Здравствуйте. Вопросы. Что скорость света вакууме константа - нужно подтвердить прямым опытом? Или кто-то пример, таких опытов может привести (опыт Майкельсона 1882/2024 г в этом плане выполнен всего на 50%). Почему легче современным физикам ещё написать новых 1000 теории как ОТО Эйнштейна, чем проделать один прямой опыт за два столетия?

When i first started learning about quantum mechanics, I had this intuitive thought that was basically the conclusion that gravity is just an emergent property of amalgamations of matter and their interactions with the underlying substrate of the quantum fields.

I've never really heard a good explanation of why mass curves spacetime...

Brilliant! You should have 100k subscribers!

Great one!

Of course gravity is emergent. It is a perpendicular dimension to mass and time is a hypersphere not a column.

Got it! Draw a circle and calculate the volume of the corresponding sphere! Love Geometry!!

Well said. Is not consciousness itself emergent?

We have never experienced in reality a 3d geometric object constantly accelerating in all directions without expansion. This is in the realm of pseudoscience, since man cannot investigate its origins, and we have no tangible evidence of it in reality. We know it not to be a force due to density and buoyancy ceasing to exist in freefall. We also know the Earth's reference frame of motion is a vector of constant upward velocity perpendicular to level by the simple fact that buoyancy always moves in the direction of motion. While still attached to the Earth's reference frame all buoyant materials rise straight up with the motion of the Earth. The geometric shape of Earth is now up for debate or we only live on one side of a sphere shooting straight down a worm hole.

Good summary

great videos !

So, what we still don't know about gravity?

Not necessarily has to be. Also you can think a universe as a system and spatial extrapolation or expansion can be just our perception of the system size increase. But then you have to turn to computer science, and ask the question such as how can you maintain a growth of a system without hitting a bound or limit? So now your problem becomes managing available space to compote while producing information consistently. So why would you consider finite limit instead of infinite? Well, since light can not reach certain areas anymore, you have casually disconnected regions therefore you indeed have certain bound or limit based on the speed of light. Everything else is just an assumption.

Does light hovering at the event horizon of a black hole, still travel at the speed of light?

I have just subscribed to your channel, excellant video, but how come the Inflaton field "vanishes into nothingnes?, If matter/energy can never be created or destroyed, does the energy that created it remain, somehow in a separate Universe?

Although I'm familiar with everything covered here, I couldn't quite make out exactly what you were saying a lot of the time and had to enable subtitles. It's not your accent as such but simply a lack of clear enunciation. Mainly in the elision of consonant sounds and in some cases complete syllables. Something that many otherwise well educated young people are prone to these days. If you want to make English language videos I think you need to take some elocution lessons and learn how to use your lips and tongue in a more controlled way.

Fantastic theory. I have been thinking this for a long time

Amazing video, very well explained. Are you sure that time is absolute in QM? It is my understanding that Dirac integrated special relativity into QM, which means that time is not treated as absolute. Fantastic overview of the holes of modern physics. Congratulations. Amazing for a high school student.

Well explained , thank you

Samsara

The Life-Desire is the Force/Motor of Life, in direct extension We have the Will, (Life-Side) and Gravity, (Stuff-side) -By our Will, We do Balance Gravity of Earth, with our own, when We lift the cup.- So, Will is Life-power, and Gravity is Stuff-ower. The Eternal Perspective.

See the thing is, everything we predict with General relativity is dead on yet QM is all statistics and inherently imprecise so the fact people believe we need to make gravity Quantum instead of making the Quantum classical is mindboggling to me.

We can ignore string theory forever 😂

It could be as simple as the electron clouds are distorted by the presence of other particles making them slightly more likely to be measured in the direction of other masses. Essentially by going from a wave state to a particle state would happen more often in the direction of particles that "measure" or "observe" it leading to both masses moving towards it other probabilistically in direct proportion to their masses.

Very nice well explained, concise vid. I think there may be another possible mechanism from a realist perspective, in the form of physical connections and an 'instant off' mechanism. It's out there in a semi-classical way... Imagine a field of +ve field cells (base quanta) close-packed and balanced by a free-flowing, compressible, displace-able -ve electro-gas. The field wants to be a ball of equidistant cells, but kick a cell (or cells) free with 'full escape energy' and it and the excess -ve gas left behind are repelled into balls by the far more balanced surrounding field trying to stay that way while the imbalance tries to expel its excess charge. -- There is also a thin connection between the positron_electron pair consisting of cells and -ve gas vibrating in sync on their spot from side to side, being accelerating towards each other, overshooting, then being pulled back. These connections can cross / pass through each other and straighten, shrink and grow as the particle moves. Cells may even move at C on average, though how this would work with the accelerating and decelerating I don't know. The point is, when one cell in the connections stops vibrating (in sync enough) the connection is instantly broken (wave collapse). The entangled particles are temporally linked but this can in turn entangle physical properties. -- I'm not sure how this could work with light but it makes some sense for +ve and -ve particles in this model from which spin, magnetism, gravity, mass the strong force all emerge in interesting, realist, semi-classical ways... Magnetically linked particles can also be entangled in this manner.

You and everyone were "taught" this concept. Falling is absolute, accelerating, AND ALL OBSERVERS AGREE on exactly what is happening, which is GREATLY different than a velocity in space where each velocity has INFINITE definitions. This is EXACTLY like saying NO DEFINITION. That velocity means nothing to nature until it hits something. THEN, it becomes absolute. Stop practicing what you were taught, and try to make better sense of it, because following a crowd is always irresponsible.

Good job. Good humor as well. I liked it. 👍🏻

Gravitational waves have been detected to travel through space at the speed of light and electromagnetic frequencies; an indication that it is generated at the quantum level of the universe by the unification of two of the other three known fundamental forces, one of which is electromagnetism, both positive, provided by the electrons of the atom, and negative, provided by its protons. The other is therefore either the weak nuclear force or the strong nuclear force: Figure out which one, and you have gravity. Seen in this light, it can be said that gravity is an emergent property of the atom. And in fact, all forms of energy is generated by the combination of two or more of the four known fundamental forces.

Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the totality of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.* It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people. [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force. 2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.

If variables are hidden due an apparent vacancy where was source; there is no choice is there? It cannot be predeterministic for us due to the vacancy holding what we perceive as inderterminant potentiality due to the vacancy having no quality to which to percieve? But would this make the idea of god hollow? AnywYs that's besides my point being that due to that aspect of nature entangled with the determinate, we yet remain tge ultimate collapsers of what we have no choice but to percieve as indeterminate, save for our perception being willfully in control of potentiality in constant flux from indeterminate and determinate via our power of perception? The theory I have been proposing for a few years now is based on consensus. And consensus is malleable. There are tricks to the trade I learned from reading Theories of Mass communication. Thanks for sharing. Peace~.. . ..

Einstein was right yet again, there -are- hidden variables. Non-locality is a garbage nonsense concept. Their entire argument rests upon their Bell inequality violations, however, they're a result of faulty experiments and mathematics. There are plenty of papers that demonstrate so: "Violation of Bell Inequalities as a Violation of Fair Sampling in Threshold Detectors" "Is the moon there when nobody looks?" "Test of the no-signaling principle in the Hensen loophole-free CHSH experiment" Non-locality is nonsense. Super-positions are nonsense. Particle entanglement is nonsense. Quantum computers are a con. They're not even "the same thing" either, they're particles of opposite spin that are very closely correlated, but not perfectly correlated. It's akin to spinning two spinning tops on a table, one clockwise, the other counterclockwise, and saying they're "entangled" because their spin is correlated as opposites. Absolute nonsense.

Great video.