The true nature of Quantum Entanglement
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2023
- Quantum entanglement is absurd. How do particles that are millions of light years apart can still affect each other and that too instantaneously , seemingly breaking the light speed barrier.
This video will try to provide a fresh perspective of looking at it and we will also present you an entirely different solution to the entanglement problem.
This video explores the enigma of quantum entanglement, where particles separated by vast distances seem to instantaneously influence each other, challenging our understanding of the speed of light. It delves into the history of quantum mechanics and Einstein's skepticism, highlighting the EPR Paradox, which led to the proposal of hidden variables as a solution. However, Bell's experiments revealed that quantum mechanics prevailed, demonstrating a probabilistic, non-local world. The video offers a fresh perspective, suggesting that entanglement isn't about faster-than-light influences but rather that entangled particles are, in a sense, one and the same. It raises the possibility of superdeterminism but leaves us with the choice between a non-local, uncertain world or one where hidden variables hold the key to understanding the mysteries of quantum entanglement.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Blog : priyanshnamdeo.wordpress.com/
My Blog : thespace-timestuff.blogspot.com/
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Thanks For watching.
Written , Presented and Edited by :
PRIYANSH
The many worlds interpretation, simply the idea that there is no wave function collapse, provides a local solution.
Very nice well explained, concise vid. I think there may be another possible mechanism from a realist perspective, in the form of physical connections and an 'instant off' mechanism. It's out there in a semi-classical way... Imagine a field of +ve field cells (base quanta) close-packed and balanced by a free-flowing, compressible, displace-able -ve electro-gas. The field wants to be a ball of equidistant cells, but kick a cell (or cells) free with 'full escape energy' and it and the excess -ve gas left behind are repelled into balls by the far more balanced surrounding field trying to stay that way while the imbalance tries to expel its excess charge.
--
There is also a thin connection between the positron_electron pair consisting of cells and -ve gas vibrating in sync on their spot from side to side, being accelerating towards each other, overshooting, then being pulled back. These connections can cross / pass through each other and straighten, shrink and grow as the particle moves. Cells may even move at C on average, though how this would work with the accelerating and decelerating I don't know. The point is, when one cell in the connections stops vibrating (in sync enough) the connection is instantly broken (wave collapse). The entangled particles are temporally linked but this can in turn entangle physical properties.
--
I'm not sure how this could work with light but it makes some sense for +ve and -ve particles in this model from which spin, magnetism, gravity, mass the strong force all emerge in interesting, realist, semi-classical ways... Magnetically linked particles can also be entangled in this manner.
Great video.
If variables are hidden due an apparent vacancy where was source; there is no choice is there? It cannot be predeterministic for us due to the vacancy holding what we perceive as inderterminant potentiality due to the vacancy having no quality to which to percieve? But would this make the idea of god hollow? AnywYs that's besides my point being that due to that aspect of nature entangled with the determinate, we yet remain tge ultimate collapsers of what we have no choice but to percieve as indeterminate, save for our perception being willfully in control of potentiality in constant flux from indeterminate and determinate via our power of perception? The theory I have been proposing for a few years now is based on consensus. And consensus is malleable. There are tricks to the trade I learned from reading Theories of Mass communication.
Thanks for sharing.
Peace~.. . ..
How can you determine that the particle is is superposition when you're not measuring it......... when you're not measuring it?
Veritasium has a good video about this, it works this way: you CAN’T say they are in superposition, but you NEED to acknowledge that the particles spins are UNDETERMINED on the moment of measurement, because if they weren’t then you could measure opposite spins 50% of the time if you measured the particles along a vertical axis for one of the particles and a horizontal axis for the other, and it NEVER happens, angular momentum is always conserved. Then the math behind QM tells you that this particles are in superposition (but it’s just the math). That and the fact that electrons MUST have a spin, so it makes more sense to think that they have both spins than none at all (and that’s what the math says) but you could just say the spins are “undefined”, for theres only propf of it.
Somebody correct me please if I didn’t get this right.
You can't.
Great video!!!
Thank you!!