Is the Universe Biased! Matter Antimatter Asymmetry

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 июн 2024
  • This video is about matter antimatter asymmetry.
    Antimatter is arguably one of the most fascinating things we have in the universe.
    Or we don’t have in the universe. See anywhere we look there is matter , antimatter is almost nowhere to be found.
    Antimatter is some sense is very similar to normal matter. We call it antimatter because it has the opposite charge of the usual set of matter particles. And whenever matter and antimatter touch they annihilate each other. So just after the big bang all of the matter and antimatter in the universe should have annihilated each other leaving behind nothing but photons. So why do we have matter but no antimatter.
    We really don't know the answer to this question , however we know about some conditions that must be true in the universe for this matter antimatter imbalance in the universe. Known as Sakharov Conditions these are :-
    1) Interactions in the universe must be out of thermal equilibrium , which our universe fulfills so no problem there
    2) Baryon number violation , Baryons are particles made up of three quarks. For example both proton and neutron are baryons as both of these are composed of three quarks.
    3) C and CP symmetry violation.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    My Blog : thespace-timestuff.blogspot.com/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thanks For watching.
    Written , Presented and Edited by :
    PRIYANSH

Комментарии • 16

  • @ohhitsaryan
    @ohhitsaryan 2 года назад

    good job !!

  • @KaliFissure
    @KaliFissure Год назад

    Time is a compact dimension one single Planck second in size. This is why we are trapped in a very brief present, which flows because of rotation of this compact dimension, but we can never move around in time. We are always NOW.
    Given this we can , using Kuramoto synchrony , evolve a hyperplane of the present. This later of now we exist on. Matter is on one side of this hyperplane and antimatter is on the other. An inflow here is an outflow from there. Clockwise here is counterclockwise there. This is why chirality and charge symmetry.
    Electron half spin is an artifact of this topology. Electron has one orbit, expressed, on this side but another second orbit as positron on the other side of temporal membrane. This preserves conservation at all points at all times.

  • @entertainmentupdates5730
    @entertainmentupdates5730 2 года назад

    awesome bro just keep it up

  • @thenameyouwant.1966
    @thenameyouwant.1966 Год назад

    U got another level potential

  • @davidrandell2224
    @davidrandell2224 Год назад

    QM classicalized in 2010: Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the ‘hidden variables ‘ and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck,Bohr etc. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for better physics.

  • @thinkingabouttomorrow1318
    @thinkingabouttomorrow1318 Год назад

    Slightly more antimatter went into primordial black holes. No assymmetry occurred.

  • @snarzetax
    @snarzetax 2 года назад

    You can find antimatter(a positron) when a banana decays. Every forty minutes or so, the decay of potassium creates a free positron. Also, we can find antimatter in the isotope injections required for specific medical scans, such as a PET scan (positron emission tomography).
    Antimatter is actually quite common, in real life. You just have to know where to look. :)
    Why more matter than antimatter? Perhaps positive duration (time) influences the positive matter ratio.

    • @priyanshnamdeo
      @priyanshnamdeo  2 года назад

      okay , to start, I think i said "almost" no antimatter in the universe. Yes technically there is antimatter in the universe. Like it has to be in the universe for us to observe it , we have made it , studied it. And yes there are processes that create antimatter. But what I meant was that even if you include all of it its not nearly as much in the universe as matter is.

    • @snarzetax
      @snarzetax 2 года назад

      Please don't be angry. Sometimes, I make comments for other people(not you) to read, and understand more. You seem to have a pretty good grasp of the content so, I don't know how much more I could add to it, other than differing perspectives.
      I like your content. Discussion creates greater understanding.

    • @priyanshnamdeo
      @priyanshnamdeo  2 года назад +1

      @@snarzetax no , I was not being angry. I just thought i should clarify if someone has misunderstood what I meant to say. But yes , you are doing good , clarifying things that should be clarified. I appreciate that. Plus in reality i don't really know much. Most of the time I have to rely upon what I have read in good sources to make the point. But I am trying to be better.

    • @snarzetax
      @snarzetax 2 года назад

      @@priyanshnamdeo Yeah, there is a lot of bad information out there and as it turns out, all of us are still learning. Perspective and relativity are tricky things, they hide much of the universe from us, without us actually realizing it.
      However, we can unlock a whole sudoku with one number, if we're given enough rules to follow.
      Maybe, the mark of true intellect is sifting through all available data and making sense of it enough for predictable application. Good on you.
      Cheers!

  • @rekmeerdink5735
    @rekmeerdink5735 Год назад

    It is not true that anti-matter is missing from our Universe, because what one calls "matter" is itself a mixture of matter and anti-matter when understood from 1) the Unified Field Theory and 2) from the fact that our Universe is part of a Giant Globular Resonance of multiple Universes, which includes a Universe with the reverse symmetry of matter and anti-matter. The reason for the confusion over this issue is the denial of a deep physical reality in terms of the fabric of spacetime. The metaphysical supernatural nothingness vacuum theory conjecture is wrong. The Vacuum theory is based on the rejection of the Stationary Aether Theory, but the Substance Monism principle and the corresponding Ceaselessly Moving Aether Theory was never seriously explored. This is due to the prejudice of the Ruling class to favor Heraclitus (who defends a Cosmic mind creating The Laws of Nature as "Reason") and the mechanical ideas of Democritus of Abdera (atoms in a void). The Ionian Materialistic Monists (Thales and Anaximander), Parmenides, and Spinoza all agreed that "space" is a material body that is infinitely dense, infinitely extended, eternal, and almighty in the dark energy of its Radiant Quantum Materialistic Monism. The supersymmetry theory of matter and anti-matter and smatter and anti-smatter (based on the DHQM revolutionary physics of particle and sparticle supersymmetry) holds that what is called the "positron" is actually an oscillation of a dialectical material charge modified from the Basic Materialistic Radiation (George W. Hill, the founder of the fractal ceaselessly moving materialistic radiation physics). All dialectical materialistic charges go from positive to negative in their absorption and emission of sub-quantum electrical corpuscular bodies. The full spectrum of materialistic corpuscular bodies are in a spectrum that goes to smaller and smaller bodies as particles and larger and larger bodies as sparticles. At the mean of this full spectrum of quantum corpuscular bodies, which are nearly all "hidden variables", are the observable variables that are known by the Standard Model (Hadrons consisting of Baryons and Mesons, as in quarks, and Leptons. as in electrons and neutrinos). The Periodic Table of the Quantum Corpuscular Bodies, developed by myself independently and partially by Haim Harari (The Structure of Quarks and Leptons, Scientific American, April 1983), demonstrates that quantum corpuscular bodies are, as established by George W. Hill, completely corpuscular in nature and that the probability waves are actually deterministic particles-in-bulk (sparticles-in-bulk in supersymmetry DHQM physics). This means that, for example, all quantum corpuscular bodies are in a giant globular resonance linked contiguously to itself as an invariance, obeying the physics established by James Clerk Maxwell and the invariance in Einstein's STR and GTR physics (considered under the ontological outlook of Spinoza's DHQM philosophy). The DHQM geodesic algorithm describes the separation of the oscillating charges into opposites. This means that, following the Rishon Model (with some changes made), the positron cycles into an electron in simultaneous activity with the electron cycling into a positron. The quark quantum corpuscular bodies do the same, simultaneously. The whole of Nature is directly linked to itself in the contiguous touching of the infinitely dense and infinitely extended cosmological constant Basic Materialistic Radiation (the RQMM) and the direct linking of every plenum to every other plenum at the same time. The modular modification within this infinite materialistic spacetime continuum, which is in complete agreement with Einstein's STR and GTR physics, is nothing more than the transformations of quantities into qualities and vice versa. The power of the new revolutionary physics far exceeds the power of the mystical-mechanical quantum mechanical interpretation. The DHQM physics also unifies the four forces of Nature into a single elctrocolour thermal dynamic force and explains gravity through the supersymmetry theoretical physics of the transformation of deep cosmic materialistic spacetime field physics. Thus the question of the asymmetry of matter and anti-matter is solved by negating the asymmetry itself, by proving the absolute cause and effect materialistic interpretation of spacetime under the aspect of the electrocolour thermal dynamic force.

  • @nilanjankmukherjee234
    @nilanjankmukherjee234 2 года назад

    Please Try to make your voice as clear as possible

    • @priyanshnamdeo
      @priyanshnamdeo  2 года назад

      Definitely I will try to improve. For now you can use subtitles/closed captions.