Видео

Hi, can you help me? I would like to know if you know where I can get the file to print the frame of the Browning Hi Power 9mm

Q: What's the easiest way to learn about the AR-15? A: Say something technically wrong about it. Hundreds of autists will come to correct you within minutes and will still somehow not be entirely correct, sparking an endless chain reaction.

Bạn có thể chia xẻ cho tôi file in 3d của khẩu súng này không tôi rất thích nó

What type of filament is this?

Nope ur wrong about the Garand. Best battle implement ever devised.. not like that mattel made junk.. never had any problems Honestly surprising how people will still say ar15s are unreliable, even after what 60 years after their teething issues? No mention of Garand development, because thats the boomer's holy grail.

As a fellow autistic gun nut, who knows and loves the history of the M-16 / AR15 platform (have trained heavily, mostly all my basic combat training, with the M16A2, first military rifle I qualified with and never shot below expert ;) , and deployed and carried the M16A4 with ACOG for one deployment in Afghanistan... which I liked much better than the M4, at least, it fit the terrain I was in VERY WELL) I appreciate the almost anal attention to detail, both in your explained history, and as well as pointing out all the small details on how the weapon series evolved and PERFECTED.

can I buy it from you?

@forgottenweapons

If you slog your way thru the congressional investigation you will see the Ord. Dept. And Olin were totally at fault for this rifle failure.

“Sabotage is intentionally making it fail…” So that’s the Elbonian Powder Theory then.

Your voice sound like Karl from inrangeTV

Forgotten Weapons and Small Arms Solutions could not be reached for comment.

I wonder what opinions Chris Bartocci would have on this

I love this tech so much and am a proponent of liberal gun laws, but you guys need to stop making them look like fucking toys

I like Wendigoon but he's far too willing to believe negative things about people in authority without the evidence to back it up.

awesome... a question only please, the impression has metal parts, like nerves that improve the support of the efforts? ... thanks for sharing, greetings from Ecuador !!

I have 2 mod. 11s. Love them. I personally really like the old safety. My father was a lefty so he didn't have to reach around the trigger guerd to take off safety.,and can ride the safety until thump it off. He was a quail hunter

Never knew the bolt rebounded thank you ! Always wondered why the buffer tube?

Very nice and well done!

Caaaaaaaacete😮😊

Someboy could please share me the files? I would make money selling this in my 3rd world country

I heard the powder change from a recording of Eugene Stoner, that's enough for me.

Bad and wrong,it is badong! 😂😂

Fantastic M16-quad laser with what appears to be an impeccable decimal design! Happy 2025🎉 to you. May it be a memorable year for you at the lab.

Bump

Theres this dude name scootet hes a legend at it

have you tried the Hoffman super safety? On these since they use the same ar lpk lmk if it would work im try it

What lower is that

what was the original length of the barrel in the early model?

First I've ever heard of imr 4475. Learn something new everyday. Lot like 3031 I read.

WOW...." 223 " WAS CREATED FOR THE DESIGN OF THE RIFLE. MILITARY POWDER AT THAT TIME WAS DIRTY. I WISH I HELD ON TO THE ARTICLE ABOUT THE MAKING OF THE AMMUNITION. ONE NCO, THE PAPERWORK OF WHAT POWDER TO USE FOR THE 5.56 ROUND. THE SPECIFIED POWDER BURNED CLEANER. THAT POWDER WAS NOT...NOT IN THE MILITARY LIST OF WEAPON POWDER. THE NCO " CHECKED " WHICH POWDER WOULD BE USED. THE SPECIFIED POWDER WOULD HAVE T9 BE BOUGHT, MANUFACTURED....TALKING ABOUT QUITE ALOT OF RIFLES BEING USED BY THE MILITARY. THE " COSTS " WAS THE REASON. THE POWDER USED " GUMMED" UP THE GAS SYSTEM. THE BOLT WOULD GET VERY DIRTY. GO FIND GUYS WHO HELD THR EARLY M16s IN COMBAT. HEAR THE PROBLEMS ENCOUNTED. PONDER....WWII....GARAND, CARBINE...GAS OPERATED....BUT NO TUBE DELIVERY TO THE BOLT. NO ISSUE WITH POWDER. THE TUBE....GAS REACHED THE BOLT VIA THE TUBE. GAS PRESSURE ENTERS THE CARRIER AGAINST THE TAIL OF THE BOLT . THE PRESSURE CAUSES THE CARRIER TO THE REAR. THE CAM, AS THE CARRIER MOVES REARWARD CAMS THE BOLT TO UNLOCK. THE WRONG POWDER WAD NOT A MYTH. ALL OF THE " BS" CHANGES WERE TO COVER SOME BEHINDS. MILITARY POWDET AND THE RIFLE DESIGN TURNED OUT TO BE A FIASCO. GO FIND THE " COMIC" BOOK THAT CAME WITH THE M16s. Given to troops about the issues of the rifle. Final ljne?....Clean the rifle as often as possible. The WRONG POWDER

should the timing notches be aligned? After disassembling my model 11 today they were loose and misaligned?

Kalashnikov was an AK guy. He seemed to like the gun.

PLEASE make more of these.

my whole unit deployed to the DMZ in July '66 from Carson. I heard hey all got brandy new 16s. Never heard from them again. Here's to my 80th and 84th. of the 5th Mech wading across Nam to get a road built to the Ho Chi Minh trail

Holy CRAP 😮 I thought I had the "tism" when it came to the AR-15, dude your a friggin encyclopedia of all thing AR! Awesome upload! 🤙🏻

I mean I’m sure it’s a lot easier with the hammer already back. How would you do that on a striker fired gun like a Glock?

At the front , where it counts. Older dude. The m16 was issued to me in Vietnam. Trained with a M14 in the States. Got One morning of range time in Nam with the 16 before we got on the trucks and off to the bunnies. ( Indian Country) The 16 did jam, quit a bit. Traded it for a14 in a few days to a Remington Raider. No.jams. Not a myth , they did jam. Thinking on it, my 16 did not have a forward assist.

Really really good video. Thank you for making it.

Awesome video man, thanks. I thought I knew almost everything about the early AR15 days but this was all new to me.

This is so fucking cool

Wait, I can't just trust Fudd Lore on gun forum posts?!... NO WAY! 🤭

What i really want to see is the AR-15 in its original configuration (edgewater buffer and all) vs the M16A1 (if that is the allegedly worse version by the Stoner belivers vice the M16 prime) also vs the M16A2 in every test imagineable on film as an ongoing series. Use the 4475 as well as the more modern powders in all of them. This is one thing that infuriates me about academics is the reluctance to practically test the hypothesis beyond digging through research. It needs to be falsifiable to be a true theory or argument. Don't just trust all of the data as given, but attempt to duplicate the results.

What lower is on that rifle? A prototype?

If you can, do a mythbuster on M855A1! For years I thought it was going to blow up my gun, but turns out it's basically harder M855 now

I learn more fron your AR-15 gun videos than any other youtuber. I was a believer in several of tgose myths, so thank you for correcting the record.

The first lots of ammo shipped to Vietnam had a lot of calcium in the powder. This caused the gas tube to clog up -along with the lack of cleaning caused a lot of rifles to jamb. This was quickly corrected. It’s been a while I don’t recall my source on this.

Originally Remington named the 223 cartridge the 222 magnum and it didn't sell very well commercially then tweaked it a little bit called it the 223 and it sold well then the army accepted it as there new cartridge called it 5.56x45 , the 222 magnum cartridge was about 100 thousands longer had more case capacity and shot around 100 fps faster than the slightly shorter 223 not a lot of people have even heard of the 222 magnum cartridge i have a older Sierra loading manual that has hand loading listings for it , a older friend of mine has a old rifle chambered in it don't know if you can get ammo for it anymore

I watched a video of a interview with Eugene Stoner talking about these issues with the M16 early failures and i remember him stating the army not using his recommended powder caused some of the failures the rifle had also he stated he recommended crome lined chamber barrel and the inside of the bolt carrier that wasn't adopted in early production , so what Stoner stated in that interview both the army and colt dropped the ball in my opinion

The 223 cartridge was developed by Remington not Winchester or Eugene Stoner