Hey guys, wanna help us with some feedback again? We know, we asked this already in another video, but it is worth repeating periodically. Reply to this comment with your opinion on any of the following: 1. How interesting are topics of our videos? 2. What other topic (or type of topics) would you have preferred at this point in time? 3. Is choice of topic the biggest problem our channel has? 4. What other issues do you think our channel has?
1 kind of mediocre sometimes 2 Speculating a ww3 conventional war between Philippines China, NATO and Russia, others. Trump vs Kamala situation must be taken into account 3 it could be the case , yes 4 people don't like war much, not necessarily the problem of the channel. Maybe you could discuss tech and economy every new and then?
Very interesting and professionally done, didn't know about nectavim being so big, fun fact the US embassy in Lebanon sits on 40 acres and has nearly 15,000 staff yet couldn't catch two wanted islamists with 12 million dollar rewards. Israel seems to be proving the paper tiger Factor that the US and Iran manifested for decades
I think this topic was pretty interesting. As for what might be interesting... have you heard of the operations room channel? They animate battles and go very in depth. I think it might be interesting to do something similar but to add your classic macro level analysis. Basically to add commentary on specific and detailed battles.
@@inspectorclouseau6859 all of these jets where in the air during the attack. And there are no secrets in Israel everything is getting out because people speak
@@triplem5770 doesn’t necessarily mean jets were destroyed it means there is probably some sort of damage as to be expected when a missile hits but we can’t know if jets or simply just the runway were damaged
Потери авиатехники очень трудно скрыть. До сих пор никому не удалось показать пораженную авиатехнику и серьезные разрушения на израильских авиабазах. Даже качественных фальшивок я не видел.
I can remember in the opening phases of the six day war, Egypt and Syria claimed they had shot down most of Israels air force. When it was shown not to be the case. They made lame excuses. I guess wild exaggerations are normal in these cases.
@nancypelosi480 According to a book I read on the sixday war. Israel had approximately 260 combat aircraft. Most French Mirage and British Hawker Hunter . The lost 15 during the war. The Egyptians had 431 mostly Soviet MIGs and Sokhui models. SYRIA had 90 Soviet MIGS and Sukhois. The Egyptian losses were 264 with most destroyed on the Ground. The rest were moved out of range and took no further part in operations. Syria lost 58 aircraft and the rest moved to hiding to avoid further loss. Jordan had 22 combat aircraft and lost 18. They were effectively eliminated as an Air force. Your false claims are not supported by the facts. So stop talking about something you know nothing about.
@@nancypelosi480 the british remember the a10 that deliberately attacked and murdered their troops to pressure the UK goverment, they will never forget. the iranins will never forget how a US destroyer shoot down a passenger airline in order to start a war. you see, i can also lie and invent conspiracy theories on the basis of tragedies, but at least my nonsense is more believable then your nonsense.
@@Gstyle1 this is entirely a guess, but it appears to be the usual serb/iranian/indian nationalist/vatnik crowd that parrot obvious lies and dont like having them called out.
Being that the US alerted everyone to the attack hours before hand, it would be crazy for Israel to leave their best planes on the ground. Especially when they can also help to take down many of the missiles if they are in the air.
Lots of Israel's hangars are either dug underground or inside of hills and reinforced hangars. Yeah it was always fishy plus they're not like russia and don't leave their planes on the tarmac 24/7
Iran didn't claim Nevatim Airbase was destroyed. The claim was, it was hit multiple times(no doubt) and also 20 F-35s was destroyed. I don't believe 20 F-35 was destroyed myself due to lack of evidence. However, you miss the point of the missile attack. The first attack back in april showed that drones and missiles were intercepted apart from the few hypersonic missiles. This second ballistic missile attack, which comprised of purely hypersonic missiles, showed that Israel can be hit and the air defence can't intercept the majority of them. Nevatim airbase can be struck again with either more missiles or higher yield warhead for stronger explosive damage. I see the two attack events as a test for Iranian ballistic missiles, and it undoubtedly showed it works and can hit Israel anywhere.
Yes, to a degree, you are correct in the sense that they showed that they are able to reach out and touch Israel, however, with the idea that they can now continue to follow up with larger attacks to oversaturate them or with larger, warhead, etc., while they may be able to to attempt that that does not taken into consideration, the retaliatory measures that will be taken against them, which would no doubt affect the capabilities and caused them to potentially think twice
Air defense is more complicated than "did any missiles land and was there damage anything". I too would prefer to let a percentage of the missiles land on a evacuated air base and keep missiles in reserve. There isn't a reason to prevent damage to dirt and to a runway that can be repaired quickly at the expense of readiness. If it appeared that the attacks were going to be bigger than the recent attacks it will take time to launch them all. Hours. In the time it takes to launch enough missiles to saturate the air defense Israel can launch fighters and attack launchers. There is no such thing as such a simple "they launched 180 missiles and a bunch landed". Targets matter, the potential for damage matters, etc. Iran simply doesn't appear to have a reasonable arsenal for doing anything other than random terroristic damage to civilians. Who knows how many missiles would've need to have been launched to actually take out nevatim.
@@LizardFrostyIran has several hundreds of thousands of missiles in Iranian arsenal and are all underground prepared against US and not even Israel who Hezbollah can handle 1 vs 1 on the ground. No matter how israhell hit iran, the devastating effect of what will visit Tel aviv and other cities in israhell can't be comprehend.. This is not Iran of 70s or 80s with no SAM, missiles, drones, satellite images and glide bombs. And don't forget, Russia is behind them militarily too.
Proof of the evacuated airbase is not available, unfortunately, and even that of an undamaged base, too is non-existent, leaving speculation of hidden information.
@@FlinnGaidin No, he's more or less right. Countries like Russia and China always brag about their hypersonic missles but hypersonic literally just means that it's traveling faster than mach 5. That means that even the V2/A4 from WW2 was a hypersonic missle
@@galactic-guy seems like you don't know the reference, so I'll help you out. check out Habitual Line Crosser, he's the missile guru. and I recommend going through some of his voiceover news updates, easily the best ones on youtube
Info wars are a very real thing in this day and age. It's infuriating to see the blatant lies and misinformation, but at the end of the day it's just another battlefield.
@@kalya3ed8761 Israel didn't retaliate yet, or their capacity if finished, as in defense they are now faulty to stop the Regular Rockets from Hizbullah also, as we can see Haifa is hit by 135 Rockets today, Why?,.
It is not convincing based on fact of limitation imposed onto commercial satellite imagery to have 30 centimeters as highest definition resolution allowed while for example American military satellites have 10cm to 15cm. This is what Binkov did not consider hence flawed analysis and even then a 30cm crater/damages on commercial imagery will be a single dot that may not discolor from surrounding for it to be noticeable. Below 30cm diameter such will not be highlighted/captured on commercial imagery, anything smaller than 10 to 15 cm on military satellites will also not be present even as a dot/pixel.
@@agramarten He doesnt even have good images. Ive seen plenty of images, and the ones he has are like... days late, and also not even the most detailed... Its like he took days later photos, that are lower resolution, and said "see they only hit here and here" Dude..... Im not saying they hit 20 35s or whatever, but IF what your saying is true, why are you showing the least detailed images, and ones that are from days after cleanup?
This airbase costs billions and it is an Engineering Marble. It cannot be destroyed by conventional strike like that. There were no reported or observable fires or secondary explosions, indicating burning airplanes, blown munition dumps and fuel storage facilities. And holes in runways and taxi ways were patched within a couple of hours. They are equipped and trained exactly for such eventualities
@@adesholamolaimi8418 Are you joking?? Where is the damage? You are the one who is deceiving yourself. Hypersonic missile is fast but speed alone does not cause severe damage especially if it hits nothing but dirt or concrete. Look at the satellite images. Like what he said, when an aircraft or fuel depot or ammunition storage is destroyed, you will see fires, smokes, debris from the destroyed aircraft, and exploded ammunition. But in this case, there is NONE. You are just fooling yourself. 🤣
Any suggestion that the airbase is destroyed, or suggestions of multiple F-35s are destroyed are definitely propaganda. But i dont think the point of the attack was to level Nevatim. The point was to demonstrate capabilities, and remind israel that their ballistic missile defenses are not stopping a massed barrage
I agree. I think that's why we haven't seen a response from Israel yet. I think Bibi is probably pissed, but he also saw that at least 25% or more of the missiles came through, despite attempts to stop them. What if Iran increased it from 180 to 360 missiles? Or 1000 missiles? And what if they learn how to target better next time? Not only will more missiles make it through just because of the numbers, but interception rate will likely decrease as they run out of interceptors and/or they can't launch fast enough.
@@leaveme3559 as many times needed to change some people's mind in that country ! the people there (at least some more fanatic ones) were thinking they could get away with a war with Iran . now that people know they can't there is heavy public pressure on the leaders not start a war !
200 missiles launched. ~40 missiles hit Nevatim. Of those, 1 hit an empty hanger for a GulfStream, another damaged a building, and one more damaged an (empty) F-35 shelter. The only thing strike has shown is that Iran's missiles have abhorrent accuracy and are nigh useless.
@@ImBigFloppa "...~40 missiles hit Nevatim. Of those, 1 hit an empty hanger for a GulfStream, another damaged a building, and one more damaged an (empty) F-35 shelter...." your source be : trust me bro... "The only thing strike has shown is that Iran's missiles have abhorrent accuracy and are nigh useless." nice copium ...
Remember guys, this is the same channel that predicted that the Armenian-Azerbajan war would even out like Ukraine, And then in reality the Armenian army was completely destroyed in very little time
@@eugeneshis 😂😂bot Azerbajans most effective weapon in that war was the turkish🇹🇷 bayraktar tb2 drone that obliterated the armenian artillery and most vehicles
My friend lives near that base, he said 30mins before the dome start firing there were countless jets flew earlier. Israel always fly their jets when there are salvo incoming.
Israel has 66 various F-15s and 175 F-16s (in addition to their F-35 fleet), all of which are extremely capable ground strike platforms. The proposition that the destruction of 20 F-35s would have any degrading impact on Israel's ability to perform ground strikes in the region isn't supported by the data. Furthermore, Hezbollah has neither the air defense technology nor the air superiority assets to make employment of stealth technology a necessity.
@@seitengewehr98 that’s interesting I suppose. I feel like the loss of so many of your best fighters would naturally inhibit any air operations you would launch or continue in the weeks going forward. To have so many planes destroyed I feel like the base would have to take a lot of damage and I just don’t know how you could reconcile such a thoroughly damaged base with such an intense air campaign with no let up from that bombing from before to after, with no real cease in operations. IDF brought 60 minutes to the base soon after the attack the damage was not very severe. Couple craters
@@carveraugustus3840 Lol, I'm going to have to ask your forgiveness here: Given the overwhelming number of comments promoting the Iran/Russian narrative without question, it apparently went right over my head that you may have been employing sarcasm... You are right, of course. If you're interested for some crazy reason, I did just comment a ridiculously long analysis of what I consider the likely intent behind Iran's most recent strike like 15 mins ago on this video. I do have a military background, so I'm not completely talking out of my ass. Essentially, I believe Iran chose targets that represent the best of western tech, but whose destruction cannot be publicly verified to allow them plausible deniability if they miss. In this way they are seen responding to Israel's repeated strikes on the leadership and forces of Iranian proxies with what appears a more successful operation than their first and can claim success, but it also allows Israel to deny success and possibly reduce the likelihood of a large complex, western-backed Israeli response. Eastern powers, such as Russia or Iran, seem to care much more about some antiquated concept of "saving face" when it comes to the application of military power, to such an extent that they would rather lie and call a failure a success than admit the failure, study it, and adjust posture and policy accordingly. This is often the case in oppressive regimes where dictators need to appear tough and require the support of their military to remain in power, and their people have become accustomed to telling the leadership what they want to hear as opposed to a truth that threatens the leaders power. They talk a big game, whereas we talk softly, but carry a big stick. They consistently overstate the performance of their munitions and equipment, while we do the exact opposite. We then design our equipment to outmatch the performance they don't even have, and the result is something like Desert Storm or the 6 day war.
I live close to Nevatim air base and there hasn't been any noticeable decrease in air traffic. Not sure if that means anything or not, but it just seems normal here.
@@Iove75 Sure, the aim wasn't to neutralise the base. That would force Israel into serious eskalation. But the claim that they destroyed f-35 reveals what was likely the objective.
Iran never claimed that they destroyed the Nevatime base or any other base. They just announced that 80 to 90 percent of the missiles hit their targets. If the targets mainly were air bases, then just hitting the airbase validates Iran's claim. However, if you count the missiles landing on one base, I could count 32 hits visible by video. The main point here is that Israel's missile defense system is not effective against some missiles or a swarm of rockets or missiles. The most sophisticated and accurate missiles have a success rate of 75% or lower. This means 4 missiles shall be fired toward the target, hoping that 3 are on the target. 70 or 75 percent is an average number. Sometimes the success rate is 100 percent, and other times could be 20%. There are many parameters influencing the success target hit or miss or just plain missile failure.
Ted Postol says the interception rate was closer to 0%. I'm inclined to believe him. I saw just a couple of interceptions on the videos and quite a lot of interceptor missiles exploding and failing to hit anything.
you failed to take into account some important facts. Israel choose to not intercept missiles that were not going to hit anything important. the vest majority of missile landing were allowed to land. also, much easier reply concrete runways then spending a million buck arrow-3 interceptors that also take time to make, and probably going to be needed in the near future in large quantities.
@@Shelorygod it was effective enough if the goal was to show the fragility of the dome. Which i think was the end goal. This was basically a flex, proving they can more than likely attack with the intention to destroy something if there's escalation in the future. Which makes sense, their trust in the iron dome has been broken
@@yairklein-mp8vo The Iron Dome is the only layer of missile defence that can employ predicted-path to conserve missiles, and Iron Dome was never intended to deal with this class of ballistic missile. BTW, if the radar track shows that the incoming missile is going to hit inside the perimeter of the air base then it has to attempt an intercept, since the Iron Dome battery isn't going to know where all the planes are located at any given time.
Iran is under no obligation to publish such images. Nor are they required to. Hell, Israel didn't publish any either. It's war. This is how the fog of war works.
Israel didnt even want the sat footage out lmao they claimed no damage to the base and most missiles intercepted. wasnt until videos and sat pics came out confirming damage.
Also, Israel systems make a preliminary assessment of the ballistic missile trajectory. If the trajectory indicates an impact outside of a protected area, they do not bother wasting a missile for an intercept.
@@poopilypoo4964Israel is a terrorist country, they are assisting many leaders and doing genocide in Gaza don't you know? Or you also brain washed by western media?
In 1990 Saddam Husein, fired 39 Missile on Israel, back then Israel said that no one was injured.. After 30 years they revealed that 120 person were killed.. Just idiots believe them!
4:18 Notice there is no charring evident in the crater or on the vehicles surrounding it. Iran may have left out some of the warheads (weight) to increase the range and relied just on the kinetic impact at hypersonic re-entry speed
doubt that, the explosions were all recorded in multiple videos, and the booms were loud. but it is possible that some of the damage was caused by debris nstead of actually hits.
High explosives warheads don't burn things, unless they ignite some fuel source. There's a quick detonation, a fireball for about a quarter of a second, and then it fades away. There isn't nearly enough time for the temperature to burn anything, and it isn't nearly hot enough for the short time frame to burn anything
The thing is Iran don't too much care about what was damaged from what wasn't damaged. The fact is it worked to some degree as they showed that they can beat the defense system of any nation by swarming it. So trying to downplay the hits impacts etc isn't cutting it. As they could hv targeted civilian areas. Showing they are only about military to military contact Israel saw this. That's why unlike the first attack they took 3 days to respond now that they wake up they are taking forever to respond
What are you talking about? They mostly hit civilian areas. There was one hit on a school that fortunately was evacuated two hours earlier, and numerous other videos of strikes on residential areas in tel aviv.
@@stefanwarmuth5251 How you idiots keep eating up Iranian state media propaganda, while the videos and images images that directly contradict you are available to everyone is beyond me. What's worse is that you that you also have the gall to call the information released by the IDF unreliable!
Most aircraft were probably airborne at time of attack. Majority of missiles hitting ground were not targeted, deemed not a threat. Iran got some through, but minor ( from a military point) damage. Real question, what happens if Israel uses it missiles, and does Iran have any actual ability to stop them?
They may not have hit exactly 20 f35s but they obviously hit the airbase with accurate hits and Israeli air defences could obviously not stop all or even most of them. Thats what really matters here
yes Israel always tell the truth , sure! During the 67 and 73 wars with egypt and syria IDF/AF claimed that they lost no Fighter to enemy MiGs in air combat ,they said all Fighters losses are caused by Flak and SAMs. i wounder how some arab MiG pilots got ACE Status during that wars and Guncamera footage of IDF/AF planes fell victim to arab MiG was also showed in some Publications. Read " Osprey combat aircraft 44" Arab MiG-19 and MiG-21 Units in Combat
Okhy... You are jist one of the western puppet who just know the things that are being feed to you. May b Arabs couldn't manage to destroy any israeli fighters jets. But heyy!! Pakistani pilots were also there deployed in syria. We shot down 3-5 israeli jets in air combat. Go and check the fact. Israel is established on lies and she will continue to lies and fool the world especially folks like you
Fun fact is that many bots and delusional idiots in the comments were claiming that they unsubscribed, but the amount of your subscribes only grew up after this video.
Israel had years of combat experience and is not that stupid to expose their prized F-35 or any fighter jet for that matter and put it at risk to be sitting ducks!😂😂😂
If I wanted to protect 40 planes on an airbase. I would build 150 shelters with only 50 of them made from hardened concrete and compacted earth. But they would look the same from the sky
this comment section cant seem to understand that israel is not a weak or unexperienced millitary, if you look at the military succeses of the country in the last 70 years. like or hate israel but you cant change history, and history shows the israeli military is quite good
Where even are those people 😂, he thinks just because he showed evidence that’s not appearing to be true doesn’t mean he did something because isnotreal didn’t confirm a jet to be destroyed yet
most if not all missiles that Israel did not intercept were missiles that Israel calculated were going to land in an unimportant place and therefore were not worth wasting an interceptor.
Blinkov this is exactly the type of analysis I subscribe for, to see right now video content that is related to narration and discussions using readily available data about plausible claims. I also like that you dont trust what either says as propaganda is simply commonplace. 10/10
@@ofrikalif4938 I understand how the Iron Dome works, by selecting certain targets to be allowed to get hit because of low probability of casualties but it's an air base for crying out loud. Scary shit either way in my opinion.
@@MohamedAhmed-i1t1n 'Humanity"? like when it killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Syria? Iran didn't aim for urban centers because it has no military value and would certainly provoke a full-scale war, not because of "humanity".
@@sunshine6522 Did I attack a belief of yours that you kept on a cognitive dissonance fashion? Iran certainly had the capabilities in doing so, remember on 2019 when they intercepted a drone and ensured it became obsolete? Because it entered into their territory? At the same time there was a plane there that was inside their airspace and had they wanted they could have easily done so? And yet they restrained themselves? Unlike the occupation that took down the same plane in the exact position,Air Libya flight 114
Regardless of whether any damage was caused or not. They demonstrated with certainty that they have hypersonic missiles that are capable of reaching Israel and hitting targets with impressive accuracy.
On military stand point, stopping incoming missiles on military bases and civilian assets is counted for successful interception. With the radars, they can ignore near misses to save missiles and report higher interception rate. Civilians media report how many are intercepted, not realizing the near misses are not really count by the military minded. As such, report lower interception rate. It just a different point of view, neither report is wrong.
@@islamicsensei You must be blind, all those near miss explosions that fell on empty fields. Like the orks, you make your own reality that no one with a few brain cells would believe.
Dude, great video, factual and logical. P.s seems like your comment section is under Iranian/pali bot attack with some russians sharts sprinkled on top, dont mind them. Keep up the good content.
I agree, I cant believe the number of anti Binkov commenters on here. This guy has been around for years and I have never seen any biasness towards Israel. So you saying these are bots not some long lost Iranian supporters...
Let me start by saying I am neither for or against either Israel or Palestine. But... People are complaining about this video being biased. It's literally a military analysis. I didn't see any bias. Most of those complaining are those who clicked on the video wanting to see what damage was done to Israel. Preconceived bias led to their disappointment. Let Binkov go.
Thank you, Binkov. I wanted to know a truthful view of this attack. I found your video very informative. Let us hope cooler heads prevail and peace can be achieved.
The dome doesn't fire on targets that go outside of its area of protection. An no, an empty airbase in the middle of a field does not make it an objective worth protecting.
The video of the Dad walking around with his kids while missiles land a few hundred metres away is insane. I think instead of amusement my reaction would be along the lines of "Get in the car... NOW"
Iran never claimed the Nevatim airbase was destroyed. The Israelis claimed that the damage to the airbase was minimal or negligible. The truth obviously lies between no damage and maximal damage if you view the videos posted on RUclips.
Interesting fact: We can see satelite imagery of any Russian target within a few minutes, but we cannot see the same imagery for any targets hit in Israel.
@@طارق-ث4غ8ث Nevatim is the air base that got hit the hardest, by far. Looks like 32 hits inside the base. But the satellite imagery, even the pics from Iran, don't look bad.
High Tech Sector. In every Smartphone there is a MADE IN ISRAEL somwhere...that is also the reason why the grim beeped Hezbollah with the pagers...they just produced the pagers themselves and sold it to the shiite arabs. The expensive aircraft were probably co designed with Israel, so they got it very cheaply.
@@Leosteel. not so true, US did finance some huge amount but IL pays $2.75 billion for 20 F35, Lockheed Martin said it would buy parts and systems for the F-35 from Israeli companies at a cost of $4 billion. Its a market, not everything is BLACK AND WHITE.
You must be on the right side of history Binkov since all the evil in the world is sending their bots to invade your comments :D Good work! And very nice video!
The fact is the airbase was hit and it took serious damage. They have released high resolution satellite images and you can clearly see damage done to hangars and parking bays. You see undamaged aircraft on some of these bays, but they have clearly been placed there after the wreckage of damaged aircraft has been removed.
In 1990 Saddam Husein, fired 39 Missile on Israel, back then Israel said that no one was injured.. After 30 years they revealed that 120 person were killed.. Just idiots believe them!
"I'm gonna play the devil's advocate" when referring to one side of the conflict, this alone makes the video a piece of propaganda rather than an objective analysis and the credibility of the entire channel now is questionable.
Iran has stated they don't have the intention to engage in an all out war unlike Israel that has been acting with complete impunity wreaking havoc everywhere. This Iranian attack was a statement similar to the one in April where they provided 72 hours notice. Although with this one they sought to make a stronger point.
@@maximr6576 history will judge you, go read the lancet about the civilian death toll, Israel killed more then the nazi killed jew after 1 year of war... This is what you are standing for. Nothing justify rape in detention center, nothing jutify regular amputation of prisonner secondary to misstreatment, nothing justifie sniper killing children, healthcare worker, nothing justify 100 000 thousand kid slaugtered (againt, go read the lancet about the casuality)
Huh… so when this guy was talking about Ukraine everyone was hanging onto every word.. now that it’s about this people question it. 😂😂 people need to stop being such sheep.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey guys, wanna help us with some feedback again? We know, we asked this already in another video, but it is worth repeating periodically. Reply to this comment with your opinion on any of the following:
1. How interesting are topics of our videos?
2. What other topic (or type of topics) would you have preferred at this point in time?
3. Is choice of topic the biggest problem our channel has?
4. What other issues do you think our channel has?
We need more videos on topics like these
1 kind of mediocre sometimes
2 Speculating a ww3 conventional war between Philippines China, NATO and Russia, others. Trump vs Kamala situation must be taken into account
3 it could be the case , yes
4 people don't like war much, not necessarily the problem of the channel. Maybe you could discuss tech and economy every new and then?
Very interesting and professionally done, didn't know about nectavim being so big, fun fact the US embassy in Lebanon sits on 40 acres and has nearly 15,000 staff yet couldn't catch two wanted islamists with 12 million dollar rewards.
Israel seems to be proving the paper tiger Factor that the US and Iran manifested for decades
I think your video topics are very interesting i watch every video
I think your channel just gets caught out by keywords RUclips is scared of
I think this topic was pretty interesting.
As for what might be interesting... have you heard of the operations room channel? They animate battles and go very in depth. I think it might be interesting to do something similar but to add your classic macro level analysis. Basically to add commentary on specific and detailed battles.
Airbases are hard to destroy. They are to big and even if a jet is destroyed, Israel will never let us know
@@inspectorclouseau6859 all of these jets where in the air during the attack.
And there are no secrets in Israel everything is getting out because people speak
@@inspectorclouseau6859 blinkov channel created to lic blls of usa and israel
I just know one thing: they had to cover the whole hit sites with fake clouds on google maps
that tells you exactly what happened
@@triplem5770 doesn’t necessarily mean jets were destroyed it means there is probably some sort of damage as to be expected when a missile hits but we can’t know if jets or simply just the runway were damaged
Потери авиатехники очень трудно скрыть. До сих пор никому не удалось показать пораженную авиатехнику и серьезные разрушения на израильских авиабазах. Даже качественных фальшивок я не видел.
I can remember in the opening phases of the six day war, Egypt and Syria claimed they had shot down most of Israels air force. When it was shown not to be the case. They made lame excuses. I guess wild exaggerations are normal in these cases.
@nancypelosi480 According to a book I read on the sixday war. Israel had approximately 260 combat aircraft. Most French Mirage and British Hawker Hunter . The lost 15 during the war. The Egyptians had 431 mostly Soviet MIGs and Sokhui models. SYRIA had 90 Soviet MIGS and Sukhois. The Egyptian losses were 264 with most destroyed on the Ground. The rest were moved out of range and took no further part in operations. Syria lost 58 aircraft and the rest moved to hiding to avoid further loss. Jordan had 22 combat aircraft and lost 18. They were effectively eliminated as an Air force. Your false claims are not supported by the facts. So stop talking about something you know nothing about.
@@nancypelosi480 the british remember the a10 that deliberately attacked and murdered their troops to pressure the UK goverment, they will never forget.
the iranins will never forget how a US destroyer shoot down a passenger airline in order to start a war.
you see, i can also lie and invent conspiracy theories on the basis of tragedies, but at least my nonsense is more believable then your nonsense.
@@nancypelosi480 Don't let facts get in the way of your agitprop there comrade. lmao
@@nancypelosi480 lmao bringing up Liberty just shows your true hand.
@@nancypelosi480 lmao bot as fuuuuuck
Someone triggered the bot farms
@@Typexviiib non goy bot farms and media outlets are in great despear while hiding the actual fact 🙄
In which countries?
@@Gstyle1 this is entirely a guess, but it appears to be the usual serb/iranian/indian nationalist/vatnik crowd that parrot obvious lies and dont like having them called out.
@@Gstyle1 Seems like it's the Iranian and Russian bots again... That's all I've seen so far
@@Gstyle1 muslim bot farms
Being that the US alerted everyone to the attack hours before hand, it would be crazy for Israel to leave their best planes on the ground. Especially when they can also help to take down many of the missiles if they are in the air.
Exactly. Israeli Airforce wont be stupid to leave such prized assets in the open where it will be a sitting duck during an attack
Damn, we can make a salt mine from the comment section, lol
Silence westoid.
Make me lmao
@@snikrepak Worrhless CIA bot.
LOL
i've seen lot more people calling out more bot
Binkov, can we get a video on the massive upswing in the population of Iranian bots in your comment section? Thanks!
censor news as much as you can
Anyone I disagree with is a “bot” 🤡👍
Bro really call us bot 🤣
Just look at the age of the account, anything under 3 years is automatically a bot.
@@snikrepak mad?
Yup. I never believe the "20 Israeli F-35 was destroyed" either. Too fantastical. Great video, Binkov! Keep it up!
Is that a plane? Is that a bird? No that’s Islamists’ lies crashing back to earth. 😂😂😂
The iranian regime made the claim of the F-35 destroyed so soon after the attack that you knew something had to be wrong.
Lots of Israel's hangars are either dug underground or inside of hills and reinforced hangars. Yeah it was always fishy plus they're not like russia and don't leave their planes on the tarmac 24/7
@@randomguy-z2l Plus they had hours of warning due to shared American intelligence indicating Iran was preparing to launch an attack.
Hey Binkov, please stop working in imperial units. The world is metric by a large margin.
@@emilen2 That's why he's confused...
It's a propaganda channel for 'muricans, they won't stop using the imperial system.
He is most likely getting the units from the sources like that.
@@emilen2 he does that because he's paid to propagandize an American audience
Imagine not using the metric system. Why would anyone make their life more difficult, for no good reason?
Iran didn't claim Nevatim Airbase was destroyed. The claim was, it was hit multiple times(no doubt) and also 20 F-35s was destroyed. I don't believe 20 F-35 was destroyed myself due to lack of evidence.
However, you miss the point of the missile attack. The first attack back in april showed that drones and missiles were intercepted apart from the few hypersonic missiles.
This second ballistic missile attack, which comprised of purely hypersonic missiles, showed that Israel can be hit and the air defence can't intercept the majority of them. Nevatim airbase can be struck again with either more missiles or higher yield warhead for stronger explosive damage.
I see the two attack events as a test for Iranian ballistic missiles, and it undoubtedly showed it works and can hit Israel anywhere.
Yes, to a degree, you are correct in the sense that they showed that they are able to reach out and touch Israel, however, with the idea that they can now continue to follow up with larger attacks to oversaturate them or with larger, warhead, etc., while they may be able to to attempt that that does not taken into consideration, the retaliatory measures that will be taken against them, which would no doubt affect the capabilities and caused them to potentially think twice
Well stated response.
Air defense is more complicated than "did any missiles land and was there damage anything". I too would prefer to let a percentage of the missiles land on a evacuated air base and keep missiles in reserve. There isn't a reason to prevent damage to dirt and to a runway that can be repaired quickly at the expense of readiness.
If it appeared that the attacks were going to be bigger than the recent attacks it will take time to launch them all. Hours.
In the time it takes to launch enough missiles to saturate the air defense Israel can launch fighters and attack launchers.
There is no such thing as such a simple "they launched 180 missiles and a bunch landed". Targets matter, the potential for damage matters, etc.
Iran simply doesn't appear to have a reasonable arsenal for doing anything other than random terroristic damage to civilians. Who knows how many missiles would've need to have been launched to actually take out nevatim.
@@LizardFrostyIran has several hundreds of thousands of missiles in Iranian arsenal and are all underground prepared against US and not even Israel who Hezbollah can handle 1 vs 1 on the ground. No matter how israhell hit iran, the devastating effect of what will visit Tel aviv and other cities in israhell can't be comprehend.. This is not Iran of 70s or 80s with no SAM, missiles, drones, satellite images and glide bombs. And don't forget, Russia is behind them militarily too.
Proof of the evacuated airbase is not available, unfortunately, and even that of an undamaged base, too is non-existent, leaving speculation of hidden information.
A "hyper-sonic" ballistic missile isn't remarkable. All ballistic missiles that leave the atmosphere as part of their trajectory are hyper-sonic.
You been watching HLC? 😜
@@FlinnGaidin No, he's more or less right. Countries like Russia and China always brag about their hypersonic missles but hypersonic literally just means that it's traveling faster than mach 5. That means that even the V2/A4 from WW2 was a hypersonic missle
@@galactic-guy I know. Something HLC will go out of his way to tell people who say "hypersonic" about missiles as if that makes them special.
@@galactic-guy seems like you don't know the reference, so I'll help you out. check out Habitual Line Crosser, he's the missile guru.
and I recommend going through some of his voiceover news updates, easily the best ones on youtube
Same ring as a bullet being called a “super sonic” arrow
people can't process facts without emotions,.... this analysis was fair and unbiased but majority are crying in the comment section
Info wars are a very real thing in this day and age. It's infuriating to see the blatant lies and misinformation, but at the end of the day it's just another battlefield.
Its not emotions its indoctrination
those who disagree, present your evidence , the man presented his and its convincing
You're one of those who watch cnn and believe 😂😂
@@pjm760 facts
@@kalya3ed8761 Israel didn't retaliate yet, or their capacity if finished, as in defense they are now faulty to stop the Regular Rockets from Hizbullah also, as we can see Haifa is hit by 135 Rockets today,
Why?,.
It is not convincing based on fact of limitation imposed onto commercial satellite imagery to have 30 centimeters as highest definition resolution allowed while for example American military satellites have 10cm to 15cm.
This is what Binkov did not consider hence flawed analysis and even then a 30cm crater/damages on commercial imagery will be a single dot that may not discolor from surrounding for it to be noticeable.
Below 30cm diameter such will not be highlighted/captured on commercial imagery, anything smaller than 10 to 15 cm on military satellites will also not be present even as a dot/pixel.
@@agramarten He doesnt even have good images. Ive seen plenty of images, and the ones he has are like... days late, and also not even the most detailed...
Its like he took days later photos, that are lower resolution, and said "see they only hit here and here"
Dude..... Im not saying they hit 20 35s or whatever, but IF what your saying is true, why are you showing the least detailed images, and ones that are from days after cleanup?
This is great analysis and right on time. It is beyond me how the algorythm is not favouring you.
@@Groovy-d7v Hit =/= having looses.
This was EXACTLY on!
Really enjoy your analyses
Thank you
This airbase costs billions and it is an Engineering Marble. It cannot be destroyed by conventional strike like that. There were no reported or observable fires or secondary explosions, indicating burning airplanes, blown munition dumps and fuel storage facilities. And holes in runways and taxi ways were patched within a couple of hours. They are equipped and trained exactly for such eventualities
U better not deceive ur self it was hypersonic missiles that were used not just the ordinary rockets or drones. Google what hypersonic missiles means
@@adesholamolaimi8418 Are you joking?? Where is the damage? You are the one who is deceiving yourself. Hypersonic missile is fast but speed alone does not cause severe damage especially if it hits nothing but dirt or concrete. Look at the satellite images. Like what he said, when an aircraft or fuel depot or ammunition storage is destroyed, you will see fires, smokes, debris from the destroyed aircraft, and exploded ammunition. But in this case, there is NONE. You are just fooling yourself. 🤣
Good observation. You are right.
@@gerrycrisostomo6571I'd it's equipped with war head then you would see what is damage
@@themulticourse2460 Your English is very bad. I cannot understand you. Go back to school and study harder before talking to me, OK?
Any suggestion that the airbase is destroyed, or suggestions of multiple F-35s are destroyed are definitely propaganda. But i dont think the point of the attack was to level Nevatim.
The point was to demonstrate capabilities, and remind israel that their ballistic missile defenses are not stopping a massed barrage
How many times are they gonna do these demonstration ?
I agree. I think that's why we haven't seen a response from Israel yet. I think Bibi is probably pissed, but he also saw that at least 25% or more of the missiles came through, despite attempts to stop them. What if Iran increased it from 180 to 360 missiles? Or 1000 missiles? And what if they learn how to target better next time? Not only will more missiles make it through just because of the numbers, but interception rate will likely decrease as they run out of interceptors and/or they can't launch fast enough.
@@leaveme3559 as many times needed to change some people's mind in that country ! the people there (at least some more fanatic ones) were thinking they could get away with a war with Iran . now that people know they can't there is heavy public pressure on the leaders not start a war !
200 missiles launched.
~40 missiles hit Nevatim.
Of those, 1 hit an empty hanger for a GulfStream, another damaged a building, and one more damaged an (empty) F-35 shelter.
The only thing strike has shown is that Iran's missiles have abhorrent accuracy and are nigh useless.
@@ImBigFloppa "...~40 missiles hit Nevatim.
Of those, 1 hit an empty hanger for a GulfStream, another damaged a building, and one more damaged an (empty) F-35 shelter...."
your source be : trust me bro...
"The only thing strike has shown is that Iran's missiles have abhorrent accuracy and are nigh useless."
nice copium ...
Remember guys, this is the same channel that predicted that the Armenian-Azerbajan war would even out like Ukraine,
And then in reality the Armenian army was completely destroyed in very little time
yes! because Azerbaijan used israeli weapons
@@eugeneshis 😂😂bot
Azerbajans most effective weapon in that war was the turkish🇹🇷 bayraktar tb2 drone that obliterated the armenian artillery and most vehicles
Huh that war ended by peace treaty. What are you even talking about?
I miss the times when Binkov talked about hypothetical war scenarios...
My friend lives near that base, he said 30mins before the dome start firing there were countless jets flew earlier.
Israel always fly their jets when there are salvo incoming.
Sure
lol yes air base destroyed. That’s why Lebanon is free from a intense air campaign currently
Israel has 66 various F-15s and 175 F-16s (in addition to their F-35 fleet), all of which are extremely capable ground strike platforms. The proposition that the destruction of 20 F-35s would have any degrading impact on Israel's ability to perform ground strikes in the region isn't supported by the data. Furthermore, Hezbollah has neither the air defense technology nor the air superiority assets to make employment of stealth technology a necessity.
@@seitengewehr98 that’s interesting I suppose. I feel like the loss of so many of your best fighters would naturally inhibit any air operations you would launch or continue in the weeks going forward. To have so many planes destroyed I feel like the base would have to take a lot of damage and I just don’t know how you could reconcile such a thoroughly damaged base with such an intense air campaign with no let up from that bombing from before to after, with no real cease in operations. IDF brought 60 minutes to the base soon after the attack the damage was not very severe. Couple craters
@@carveraugustus3840 Lol, I'm going to have to ask your forgiveness here: Given the overwhelming number of comments promoting the Iran/Russian narrative without question, it apparently went right over my head that you may have been employing sarcasm... You are right, of course. If you're interested for some crazy reason, I did just comment a ridiculously long analysis of what I consider the likely intent behind Iran's most recent strike like 15 mins ago on this video. I do have a military background, so I'm not completely talking out of my ass. Essentially, I believe Iran chose targets that represent the best of western tech, but whose destruction cannot be publicly verified to allow them plausible deniability if they miss. In this way they are seen responding to Israel's repeated strikes on the leadership and forces of Iranian proxies with what appears a more successful operation than their first and can claim success, but it also allows Israel to deny success and possibly reduce the likelihood of a large complex, western-backed Israeli response. Eastern powers, such as Russia or Iran, seem to care much more about some antiquated concept of "saving face" when it comes to the application of military power, to such an extent that they would rather lie and call a failure a success than admit the failure, study it, and adjust posture and policy accordingly. This is often the case in oppressive regimes where dictators need to appear tough and require the support of their military to remain in power, and their people have become accustomed to telling the leadership what they want to hear as opposed to a truth that threatens the leaders power. They talk a big game, whereas we talk softly, but carry a big stick. They consistently overstate the performance of their munitions and equipment, while we do the exact opposite. We then design our equipment to outmatch the performance they don't even have, and the result is something like Desert Storm or the 6 day war.
I live close to Nevatim air base and there hasn't been any noticeable decrease in air traffic. Not sure if that means anything or not, but it just seems normal here.
You live in india like all other pro Israel bots.
Американские налогоплательщики быстро построят разрушенные объекты что бы СМИ не видели ущерб
@@Iove75 Sure, the aim wasn't to neutralise the base. That would force Israel into serious eskalation. But the claim that they destroyed f-35 reveals what was likely the objective.
You live in india like all other pro Israel bots.
Iranian regime lives in a totally imaginary world.
I return to this video daily to laugh at all the angry abdullah bots.
You're still losing, Schlomo.
@@l34n87 yeah haniyh is alive and nasrallh is alive
I'm sure anyone who was critical of Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction were labeled as "Iraqi bots" too...
@@l34n87how heniya? Nasrallah? Sinwar 😂?
It should be noted that Israel wasn't the only one shooting down missiles. The US has claimed multiple missile interceptions.
Yeah, they destroyed 190 out of the 180.
Last I checked, the us was still not saying if they actually hit anything. Just that they responded
Did you watch the video? Binkov states the USA and Jordan intercepted some missiles.
Iran never claimed that they destroyed the Nevatime base or any other base. They just announced that 80 to 90 percent of the missiles hit their targets. If the targets mainly were air bases, then just hitting the airbase validates Iran's claim. However, if you count the missiles landing on one base, I could count 32 hits visible by video. The main point here is that Israel's missile defense system is not effective against some missiles or a swarm of rockets or missiles. The most sophisticated and accurate missiles have a success rate of 75% or lower. This means 4 missiles shall be fired toward the target, hoping that 3 are on the target. 70 or 75 percent is an average number. Sometimes the success rate is 100 percent, and other times could be 20%. There are many parameters influencing the success target hit or miss or just plain missile failure.
Ted Postol says the interception rate was closer to 0%. I'm inclined to believe him. I saw just a couple of interceptions on the videos and quite a lot of interceptor missiles exploding and failing to hit anything.
Their attack even if it was successful at hitting their targets want that effective...
you failed to take into account some important facts. Israel choose to not intercept missiles that were not going to hit anything important. the vest majority of missile landing were allowed to land. also, much easier reply concrete runways then spending a million buck arrow-3 interceptors that also take time to make, and probably going to be needed in the near future in large quantities.
@@Shelorygod it was effective enough if the goal was to show the fragility of the dome. Which i think was the end goal. This was basically a flex, proving they can more than likely attack with the intention to destroy something if there's escalation in the future. Which makes sense, their trust in the iron dome has been broken
@@yairklein-mp8vo The Iron Dome is the only layer of missile defence that can employ predicted-path to conserve missiles, and Iron Dome was never intended to deal with this class of ballistic missile.
BTW, if the radar track shows that the incoming missile is going to hit inside the perimeter of the air base then it has to attempt an intercept, since the Iron Dome battery isn't going to know where all the planes are located at any given time.
Don’t think Iran said it was destroyed they just said it was hit
They never claimed it. This is just more pro-Zionist propaganda
@Joey_Avocado tell that to the thousands of morons reposting that exact quote lmao, can't can you? Truth hurts man
Iran: Our missiles are not effective. Unleash the internet trolls!
@@ycplum7062 Nice joke
@@ycplum7062 Israel: our media ban is ineffective, release Hasbara trolls!!! 🙄
@@El_Rudothere no media bans💀
@@IceFortress9676 lol, ok Benji 🤡
@@IceFortress9676 thanks for making my point has-benji-ara 👍
All the people in the comments that say that he is lying, ask yourself why iran didn't publish pictures to prove their claim?
Iran is under no obligation to publish such images. Nor are they required to. Hell, Israel didn't publish any either. It's war. This is how the fog of war works.
I don't see the little hat people publishing a damn thing. Going as far as to beg their population not to take pictures and videos.
Israel didnt even want the sat footage out lmao they claimed no damage to the base and most missiles intercepted. wasnt until videos and sat pics came out confirming damage.
@@chillout1109maybe you should chillout
LOL the irony! Why isn’t Israeli government allowing to show the damages? 😂
Also, Israel systems make a preliminary assessment of the ballistic missile trajectory. If the trajectory indicates an impact outside of a protected area, they do not bother wasting a missile for an intercept.
Iran better not play victim when Israel gives payback
Iran is the victim, that's why they respond this way.
@@manteca2132 how exactly is iran a victim?
@@poopilypoo4964
你的意思是。美国和以色列。才是受害者？🤣
你的世界观。对黑与白的判断。是不是出现了什么颠倒？
@@poopilypoo4964Israel is a terrorist country, they are assisting many leaders and doing genocide in Gaza don't you know? Or you also brain washed by western media?
In 1990 Saddam Husein, fired 39 Missile on Israel, back then Israel said that no one was injured.. After 30 years they revealed that 120 person were killed.. Just idiots believe them!
If Iran says something we should guess it's the other way around
just like your mother did
The opposite of whatever the IRGC claims is most likely the truth...
@@lashlarue7924 Too bad, the Shah can't help you anymore!
@@moujalbahr7688 I'm very sorry for what has become of Persia, it must be terrible living there and I'm so sorry for your loss, friend.
@@lashlarue7924 I meant it as schadenfreude!
4:18 Notice there is no charring evident in the crater or on the vehicles surrounding it. Iran may have left out some of the warheads (weight) to increase the range and relied just on the kinetic impact at hypersonic re-entry speed
doubt that, the explosions were all recorded in multiple videos, and the booms were loud. but it is possible that some of the damage was caused by debris nstead of actually hits.
High explosives warheads don't burn things, unless they ignite some fuel source. There's a quick detonation, a fireball for about a quarter of a second, and then it fades away. There isn't nearly enough time for the temperature to burn anything, and it isn't nearly hot enough for the short time frame to burn anything
Thanks!
To everyone wanting to know the real truth:
we don’t know jackshit
yes we do
when one side covers the bloody map with clouds to hide the damage, that tells you a lot more than any official claim
"can't really be geolocated"
Rainbolt within 3 seconds: "look at that sand it's clearly in..."
The thing is Iran don't too much care about what was damaged from what wasn't damaged. The fact is it worked to some degree as they showed that they can beat the defense system of any nation by swarming it. So trying to downplay the hits impacts etc isn't cutting it. As they could hv targeted civilian areas. Showing they are only about military to military contact Israel saw this. That's why unlike the first attack they took 3 days to respond now that they wake up they are taking forever to respond
What are you talking about? They mostly hit civilian areas. There was one hit on a school that fortunately was evacuated two hours earlier, and numerous other videos of strikes on residential areas in tel aviv.
@@spiritcrusha lol you are head deep in the coolaid. They were pretty clear in their targeting....
@@stefanwarmuth5251 How you idiots keep eating up Iranian state media propaganda, while the videos and images images that directly contradict you are available to everyone is beyond me. What's worse is that you that you also have the gall to call the information released by the IDF unreliable!
You guys think 20 f35 being destroyed wouldn't be known for a certain?
These are 80 mil a plane that is 1.6 billions.
Nice analysis!
Thank you for an amazing video binkov!
Most aircraft were probably airborne at time of attack.
Majority of missiles hitting ground were not targeted, deemed not a threat.
Iran got some through, but minor ( from a military point) damage.
Real question, what happens if Israel uses it missiles, and does Iran have any actual ability to stop them?
source pissraelilie
Well, last time Israel fired just a few missiles (from planes) and took out an S-400 battery, so no, Iran has very little ability to stop Israel.
They may not have hit exactly 20 f35s but they obviously hit the airbase with accurate hits and Israeli air defences could obviously not stop all or even most of them. Thats what really matters here
The residents of Lebanon now feel how much the planes were not damaged
The initial wave of bots is always a fun circus to witness
Jeremy loffredo wants to know where you are.
Who knew Iranian internet trolls are more effective than their ballistic missiles.
most of their rockets hit izrael. iron dome cant shoot down ballistic missles. 3-5 f35 destroyed so....
@@markgonczy8293What about Arrow 2 and 3? David sling?
@@markgonczy8293 who told you? IRNA?
@mauritianpsycho neither did the ballistic missiles
yes Israel always tell the truth , sure!
During the 67 and 73 wars with egypt and syria IDF/AF claimed that they lost no Fighter to enemy MiGs in air combat ,they said all Fighters losses are caused by Flak and SAMs.
i wounder how some arab MiG pilots got ACE Status during that wars and Guncamera footage of IDF/AF planes fell victim to arab MiG was also showed in some Publications.
Read " Osprey combat aircraft 44" Arab MiG-19 and MiG-21 Units in Combat
Okhy... You are jist one of the western puppet who just know the things that are being feed to you. May b Arabs couldn't manage to destroy any israeli fighters jets. But heyy!! Pakistani pilots were also there deployed in syria. We shot down 3-5 israeli jets in air combat. Go and check the fact. Israel is established on lies and she will continue to lies and fool the world especially folks like you
Fun fact is that many bots and delusional idiots in the comments were claiming that they unsubscribed, but the amount of your subscribes only grew up after this video.
The number of moronic and idiots are increasing in his channels😂
u are just too dumb
Great video Binkov. You've annoyed all the right people by dryly presenting the facts :)
Israel had years of combat experience and is not that stupid to expose their prized F-35 or any fighter jet for that matter and put it at risk to be sitting ducks!😂😂😂
Genius
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿⠋⠀⠿⠇⠉⠻⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⣶⣶⣾⡿⠟⢿⣷⣶⣶⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡏⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢀⡇⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠘⡆⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⢣⠀⠀⠀⢯⡀⣿⡗⢏⠀⠀⢠⠒
⠒⠒⡕⠄⡀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⣸⣿⠀⠀⠐⠆⣿⡇⠀⠓⡤⠈⡆
⠀⡸⠀⡄⠈⠁⣿⡇⢀⣴⣿⠇⠀⠴⠀⠀⣿⡇⠉⠁⢀⢠⠃
⠀⠉⠁⢀⣠⣴⣿⣷⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣧⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⢀⣴⡿⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠄⠀⢀⠈⠉⠙⢿⣷⣄⠀
⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⠄⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣆
⣿⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠐⠀⠀⢹⣿
⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠄⠀⠀⢸⣿⡆⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⠀⠂⠀⢸⣿
⢹⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠂⠀⢿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡿
⠀⠻⣿⣦⣀⠁⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣷⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣾⡟⠁
⠀⠀⠈⠛⠿⣿⣷⣶⣾⡿⠿⠛⠻⢿⣿⣶⣾⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀
If I wanted to protect 40 planes on an airbase. I would build 150 shelters with only 50 of them made from hardened concrete and compacted earth. But they would look the same from the sky
this comment section cant seem to understand that israel is not a weak or unexperienced millitary, if you look at the military succeses of the country in the last 70 years. like or hate israel but you cant change history, and history shows the israeli military is quite good
Iranian 50 cent army attacking in the comments, I see
Chill pes kii!
Where even are those people 😂, he thinks just because he showed evidence that’s not appearing to be true doesn’t mean he did something because isnotreal didn’t confirm a jet to be destroyed yet
The cope is hard
Butthurt that much huh?
@@mikejohnson976nah, watch the video, it isnt propaganda
most if not all missiles that Israel did not intercept were missiles that Israel calculated were going to land in an unimportant place and therefore were not worth wasting an interceptor.
yeah people dont get that - why waste an interceptor on something that wont do damage.
The bots on this comment section are crazy
Blinkov this is exactly the type of analysis I subscribe for, to see right now video content that is related to narration and discussions using readily available data about plausible claims. I also like that you dont trust what either says as propaganda is simply commonplace. 10/10
Iran has never ever told the truth.
Israel*
Israel destroyed more American battle fleet ships than Iran
You misspelled Israel.
I mean they said they killed nasrahalla and it was true so at least is not always 0@@DanRyzESPUK
@playerxz6485 they claim they didn't kill 40.000 civilians and we know they do on a daily basis.
A snake is more trustworthy than them.
Precise or not, the sheer number of missiles that made it past the air defense would have been devastating if aimed at an urban center.
Good thing Iran has humanity
Were they passing the AD because they managed to or because Israel "allowed" them to, as they would inflict barely to no damage?
@@ofrikalif4938
I understand how the Iron Dome works, by selecting certain targets to be allowed to get hit because of low probability of casualties but it's an air base for crying out loud. Scary shit either way in my opinion.
@@MohamedAhmed-i1t1n 'Humanity"? like when it killed hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Syria? Iran didn't aim for urban centers because it has no military value and would certainly provoke a full-scale war, not because of "humanity".
@@sunshine6522 Did I attack a belief of yours that you kept on a cognitive dissonance fashion?
Iran certainly had the capabilities in doing so, remember on 2019 when they intercepted a drone and ensured it became obsolete? Because it entered into their territory?
At the same time there was a plane there that was inside their airspace and had they wanted they could have easily done so?
And yet they restrained themselves?
Unlike the occupation that took down the same plane in the exact position,Air Libya flight 114
Desert got attack by missile 😅
Those Israeli jets are so advanced they are invisible . And the airbase is as well! 🤣
Regardless of whether any damage was caused or not. They demonstrated with certainty that they have hypersonic missiles that are capable of reaching Israel and hitting targets with impressive accuracy.
So?
@@j.p.ijsblok5304 they have the capability to turn your gas into crypto
Just agree with the Iranian claims. Let them believe the air force has been greatly weakened.
On military stand point, stopping incoming missiles on military bases and civilian assets is counted for successful interception. With the radars, they can ignore near misses to save missiles and report higher interception rate. Civilians media report how many are intercepted, not realizing the near misses are not really count by the military minded. As such, report lower interception rate. It just a different point of view, neither report is wrong.
"Near misses" the only reason there were any "misses" was because there were no warheads this time😂next time will probably be different
@@islamicsensei You must be blind, all those near miss explosions that fell on empty fields. Like the orks, you make your own reality that no one with a few brain cells would believe.
Dude, great video, factual and logical.
P.s seems like your comment section is under Iranian/pali bot attack with some russians sharts sprinkled on top, dont mind them. Keep up the good content.
100%
I agree, I cant believe the number of anti Binkov commenters on here. This guy has been around for years and I have never seen any biasness towards Israel. So you saying these are bots not some long lost Iranian supporters...
Let me start by saying I am neither for or against either Israel or Palestine. But...
People are complaining about this video being biased. It's literally a military analysis. I didn't see any bias. Most of those complaining are those who clicked on the video wanting to see what damage was done to Israel. Preconceived bias led to their disappointment. Let Binkov go.
Yeah same, i see no bias, these people are brainwashed at this point
Thank you, Binkov. I wanted to know a truthful view of this attack. I found your video very informative. Let us hope cooler heads prevail and peace can be achieved.
🤣🤣🤣
I heard A LOT of maybes…
>Saying the F-35 is fine
>Applying nationwide censorship
lmao pick one bro
We’ve seen the videos Binkov. The iron Dome is anti-Semitic it’s now called Iran Doom
🤣🤣🤣
The dome doesn't fire on targets that go outside of its area of protection. An no, an empty airbase in the middle of a field does not make it an objective worth protecting.
You failed to mention that oran another base south of Israel
Dosent have F35s
@@isrolit Also the video is about Neveatim airbase
The video of the Dad walking around with his kids while missiles land a few hundred metres away is insane. I think instead of amusement my reaction would be along the lines of "Get in the car... NOW"
No one says it was destroyed, but it was hit with a repeatable action which will yield repeatable result in a formal war.
meaning the result that Iran will suffer and Israel will remain unscathed?
@@d.k.1545 unscathed? Was it?,😂
Why pig shafting IDF have made it illegal for Israeli to post videos/ photos of missile attack? Just a question.
Leaking and spreading sensitive information is not very smart.
Iran never claimed the Nevatim airbase was destroyed. The Israelis claimed that the damage to the airbase was minimal or negligible. The truth obviously lies between no damage and maximal damage if you view the videos posted on RUclips.
Blinkov never claimed that Iran claimed the Nevatim airbase, listen to the video dufus
Interesting fact: We can see satelite imagery of any Russian target within a few minutes, but we cannot see the same imagery for any targets hit in Israel.
Idk for how much Israel is saying we didn't get hit they didn't even do anything, I think they did something
they said it did minor damage as proven in satellite images
@@orchid6699 no wonder why they aren't letting anyone publish the satellite images of tel nof and hatzerim air bases
@@orchid6699 Israel says a lot of shit. Remember the terror calendar? It's full on fsb levels of arrogant incompetence
@@طارق-ث4غ8ث Nevatim is the air base that got hit the hardest, by far. Looks like 32 hits inside the base. But the satellite imagery, even the pics from Iran, don't look bad.
@@طارق-ث4غ8ث how they can prevent the publishing of the pics?
How does such a small country like Israel obtain so many expensive aircraft? How can they afford to build such a large airbase?
🇺🇸
High Tech Sector. In every Smartphone there is a MADE IN ISRAEL somwhere...that is also the reason why the grim beeped Hezbollah with the pagers...they just produced the pagers themselves and sold it to the shiite arabs. The expensive aircraft were probably co designed with Israel, so they got it very cheaply.
Thank the American tax payers
@@Leosteel. not so true, US did finance some huge amount but IL pays $2.75 billion for 20 F35, Lockheed Martin said it would buy parts and systems for the F-35 from Israeli companies at a cost of $4 billion. Its a market, not everything is BLACK AND WHITE.
Little island run by epstein
bots battlegrounds
the Iranian bots are more impressive than their missiles and air force, that's for sure.
You must be on the right side of history Binkov since all the evil in the world is sending their bots to invade your comments :D
Good work! And very nice video!
ye keep support satanahyu😂😂😂
Lol, Iran ideologues in full cope mode
The fact is the airbase was hit and it took serious damage. They have released high resolution satellite images and you can clearly see damage done to hangars and parking bays. You see undamaged aircraft on some of these bays, but they have clearly been placed there after the wreckage of damaged aircraft has been removed.
@@SL92018 These people are clinically insane, so no arguments or proofs will work with them.
And f15,f35 still flying above Lebanon right now....🤭
Its not confirmed until they officially denied it
In 1990 Saddam Husein, fired 39 Missile on Israel, back then Israel said that no one was injured.. After 30 years they revealed that 120 person were killed.. Just idiots believe them!
The cinematics are amazing.
Comrade Binkov ❌
Mister Bi(n)den ✅✅✅
Those Israeli jets they destroyed are so advanced they are invisible! 🤣
Do you not know what “stealth” means bro?
that crater's depth was much more than 6 feet.
as per american reporter 30 deep obviously bias
Its actually good that they think they did something when they barely did anything😂now they’ll do more rash decisions and walk deeper into shit
"I'm gonna play the devil's advocate" when referring to one side of the conflict, this alone makes the video a piece of propaganda rather than an objective analysis and the credibility of the entire channel now is questionable.
Binkov is an important analyst and has credibility that matches his caricature.
his credibility is his paycheck he recieves by bootlicking the ZIos.
Can you make up a story about why Devilnyahu's promise to attack Iran within 48 hours has not been carried out until now?
No one claimed believes it was a complete destruction.
Iran never intended to do major damage.
It was to send a message: We CAN touch you.
Your phone is ringing.
@@flipper184 your prime minister is running 🏃♂️
@@flipper184 terrorist detected
@flipper184 ah we have a terrorist supporting terrorist tactics here.
Iran has stated they don't have the intention to engage in an all out war unlike Israel that has been acting with complete impunity wreaking havoc everywhere. This Iranian attack was a statement similar to the one in April where they provided 72 hours notice. Although with this one they sought to make a stronger point.
In any way, when you fight against a genocide, you are never wrong
Their proxy soldiers are fighting Israel... They have all intention is fighting Israel but by hiding behind their proxies.
@@EmpereurFrancoisexcept when you fight against fake genocide
@@maximr6576 history will judge you, go read the lancet about the civilian death toll, Israel killed more then the nazi killed jew after 1 year of war...
This is what you are standing for. Nothing justify rape in detention center, nothing jutify regular amputation of prisonner secondary to misstreatment, nothing justifie sniper killing children, healthcare worker, nothing justify 100 000 thousand kid slaugtered (againt, go read the lancet about the casuality)
So many Hamas and Iran supporters crying in the comment section 😂😂😂
cope harder 🤣🤣🤣
The level of cope is unreal 💀
launch 181 missiles and not hit the wing of a fighter plane and dozens of missiles that exploded in the launchers
Wtf are you talking about
It shows that guidance is the most important part of the ballistic missle.
Huh… so when this guy was talking about Ukraine everyone was hanging onto every word.. now that it’s about this people question it. 😂😂 people need to stop being such sheep.
These people complaining are here for the first time.
Iran thinks it can destroy an airbase with 2km CEP missiles.... lol
‘Some of those missiles failed to meet their objective’
500 years from now an archeologist will find one in the sands of western Iraq
You are delusional.
@@moujalbahr7688jokeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Ignore the antisemitism binkov, great video as always!
Iran targeted 3 airbases and only show one on the map.
There is satellite imagery of all 3, with all 3 suffering just minor damage.
All 3 Suffured damages. There are satellite images
@@leoschmain9730 there was also NASA FIRMS data showing minimal heat activity
@AbdulAleem-i3s I won't consider a hit on a hangar major damage, it can be considered moderate, but not major.