@@NUKCYNDv ??? He is the most privileged spiderman ever he had everything handed to his ass on a silver platter and even then before his life with aunt may was financially stable
@@trinity9708 Ehh, nope; you are right on the financial thing, but he had a lot of struggles(He is not privileged at all); the death of Iron Man, he literally died, he doesn't know how to be responsible, he doesn't know how to deal with a double life, he doesn't how to be a hero, he doesn't know how to live with all that pressure, etc
@@NUKCYNDv he doesn’t need to know how to live a double life because everyone he loves knows and supports his double life, tony handed him stark industries on a silver platter
Spiderman DOES now how to be responsible it’s kind of his thing and this peter is just a happy go lucky kid who gave the glasses his mentor gave him to a guy he knew for 2 days everything peter does goes good for him, he gets the hot chicks without struggle he goes to a super genius school where everyone loves him and even his bully gets bullied for being a loser everything is handed to this kid, he is not spiderman
I agree. I got so much shit about thinking he was better than maguire and holland. It’s nice to see that I wasn’t the only one. No offense to holland,but I don’t care for his Spider-Man at all.
he is a very (accurate) spider-man, thats why i love it and tobey amazing too, just everything but toms spiderman! funfact: Andrews Spider-man was actually based of the 00s Ultimate Spider-man..
I remember watching The Amazing Spiderman and liking Garfield's version of him. I always thought of Spiderman as a wisecracking jerk that grows into the hero role. But apparently he's the one alot of people don't like. But it's whatever, different for everyone.
Spider-Man not only wisecrack and annoys his enemies but he'll straight up roast them just to throw them off their game which is why I like Andrew's Spider-Man too. I can let his hipster Peter Parker slide because he does show knowledge in science and tech but it's still more accurate than Tom's iron boy jr who only wants to impress Mr. Stark, gets everything handed to him and suffers little consequences for his actions.
For me. Andrew garfield is the most accurate. The suits, the jokes, the struggles, nerd, realistic, but a little bit cool Peter. But still the most accurate for me. Though bad story because of weird/akward electro and green goblin with the death of gwen stacy. The healthy relationship between Peter and gwen is a great twist. Mj is the best for me but if they didn't kill gwen, I'd stick with her. Tobey is the same also. But he's more nerdy and less jokes. And has really toxic relationship with mj. But still a accurate and great spiderman. Tom Holland is a great actor. But the accuracy is just meh. I was really excited about his movie when it first came out. But after watching it and the sequels. It's boring. I don't know men, it doesn't feel like spiderman. He's more like a "what if". What if spider man became Tony stark's sidekick. Overall. The best spiderman is still the one from the Ps4 and the spider verse.
Idk if you ever read the comics but peter had a toxic relationship with MJ before the got married in '75 (? Can't remember correctly). Tbh the best Spiderman title belongs to 2 versions: Spectacular spiderman and Miles Morales from Into the spider verse Really there's no "most accurate" version of spiderman in movies bc they all had parts of the character just wrong lemme run down the flaws in each version of spiderman: Tobey is too much of a loser as spiderman. Peter Parker is supposed to be a loser even after becoming spiderman but Tobey idk had no confidence. Also everybody forgets Tobey punched flash. thats inexcusable. Major flaw right there. Less jokes no quips. Great peter Parker, even tho he took it to the extreme he's still prolly the best? Not a good spiderman tho Garfield had the best quips hands down. But his spiderman is really stupid, ESPECIALLY in the origin. He becomes Spiderman for revenge and let's criminals go bc they aren't his uncle's killer. It takes him over half of the movie to save someone and realize "oh i should save people". Comic book Spiderman always had in him to save people. He went after Ben's killer yeah but not as a vigilante like Garfield's spiderman did. The most comic book accurate "revenge seeking" peter Parker was Tobey's. Also in that first scene of Amazing spiderman he makes jokes and lets rhino plow through the city which let's be honest prolly killed people. Like he had a whole knock knock joke. Horrible character writing. Peter showing off his powers in HS was stupid. In the comics he thought Abt it but never did anything. garfield is the best actor out of everyone tho! Just ruined by stupid writing Lastly Holland The video explained everything basically he gets everything handed to him. even his own suit is handed to him. Actually that goes against peter Parker from comics that eventually gave up the iron spider bc it was to us not his
@@carrot7215 Tobey is more accurate then your suggesting also Tom getting giving everything... I swear to god people never watched those movies and make up stuff
@@raidoukuzonoha883 no. Tobey had the most dialed down version of Spiderman, and the most extreme version of peter Parker. Garfield had the most dialed down version of peter Parker but the most extreme spiderman. Holland met in the middle but had the worst spiderman world and supporting cast ever. Like come on they kinda went opposite of what peter is. All three Spidermen have issues that balance themselves out. You can't say Tobey's better because his spiderman is the worst of the three. You can't say Garfield's spidey is better bc his peter is the worst. You can't say Holland is the best bc he has the worst writing and motivation of the three. As well as the worst world/supporting cast Tobey had many issues just remove your nostalgia goggles and see for yourself. He took the awkward part to the extreme. Comics peter was never THAT awkward. He is so awkward that his spiderman lacks any confidence and quips that MAKES SPIDERMAN. He was a good peter Parker that did what other iterations didn't do and showed his desire to help others and that peter Parker was always a good hearted person. That doesn't excuse all his flaws tho. Doesn't excuse the fact that this spiderman has near zero quips, doesn't excuse the power inconsistency from this spiderman, doesn't excuse bad acting either. Doesn't excuse the fact that he fought flash. He punched flash. We got great memes tho! Also i grew up on the trilogy and watch spiderman 2 almost every other week. I can recite dialogue from the first 5 minutes of the first movie perfectly from how much i watched it. Again I'm just not biased.
@@angels8920 sony payed for the production of the film and partnered with mcu. They had access to every Spider-Man character, but they chose not to use them.
Tom is essentially a White Miles Morales. They literally rewrote Ned to be the spitting image of Ganke. Tobey and Andrew are way more comic accurate Peter Parkers than Tom will ever be. I just hope Marvel can see this through and finally let Peter eventually become his own hero in the MCU. I never thought I’d say this, but he’s better off with Sony.
Agreed. It always annoys me when people claim that Tom is the most comic accurate Spider-Man just because he interacts with the Avengers, looks like a high schooler, and makes jokes...Spider-Man isn't tied down by the Avengers and there's a lot more to his character then just being a high schooler and cracking a few Jokes.
@@gamingstuff9396 yup agreed spiderman has now appeared in 5 mcu films still doesn't know how to fight and needs stark tech to get an advantage and in no way home a suit made by strange with magic Hollands spiderman needs help every film it's downright now and criminal the MCU in Disney has a bad habit of nerfing they are heroes hulk was completely nerfed into the laughing stock and game they made Thor fat and was playing fortnite in my opinion Andrew is the most comic accurate then Toby
Watching this after No Way Home, it’s like Marvel knew that MCU Spider-Man wasn’t the real Spider-Man, so they set out to fix him in the most perfect way possible
That why they had to fan change some things to MCU spiderman like a comic accurate suit, no one knows who Peter parker is as spiderman and now he's alone
It was planned. If you watch interviews with Jon Watts and even their recent video, it proves that this was all planned. Jon Watts even said back in 2017 that he lowered the stakes and consequences in the first films because he wanted them to be fun at first, therefore meaning he was saving this for Spider-Man 3..all of this was planned.
The version with Tobey is the most accurate, it isn't even a competition, Tobey has blue eyes and the appearance of the comic character. MJ being a redhead played by Dunst is accurate to the real comic character, even Jameson looks ridiculously like the real comic character. The first spiderman movie with Tobey Maguire probably will never be beaten in how realistic it is towards the lore and even appearance of the comics. MCU itself isn't really accurate with anything, plus it's owned by Disney, it's mostly just about cracking culture related jokes and trying to be inclusive to various peoples to attempt to expand it's market reach. MCU is essentially like a business model, where as Tobey Maguire's spiderman was a true movie trying to make a live action version of Marvel's spiderman.
@@icarus_walkthroughs you got it backwards, and i dont know how because youre in the comment section of a video that points out how that statement would be backwards
Peter “Benjamin” Parker. Uncle Ben is literally in his name. Benjamin being his middle name isn’t just because it’s a middle name. It’s because he’s the whole reason Peter is who he is. Ben is the centre of his universe, the sun he revolves around. The person that keeps him going.
@@thedamndoor45 facts, tom holland spiderman is just a side kick of ironman, it's even an insult to spiderman to call him spiderman, ironboy is better 🤣
Honestly, Garfield's version is the most comic accurate. Peter is a jackass when he first started out as spiderman in the comics. He literally said "The world can hang for all I care." So Garfield is a great Peter Parker and a great Spiderman
I agree. From the last 3 spiderman reboots Garfield is the most accurate, also director Mark Webb did an excellent job and the writers, for the quality jokes and story.
i agree garfield's spiderman is a accurate in terms of development. where as tobey is the most accurate peter parker with all of his struggle with life and taking on his responsibility on being spiderman even though tobey's spiderman can be a asshole as well remember when he let the robber get away with the money and is one of the reasons why uncle ben died by the hands of sandman by accident.
Both are astonishing wrong. BvS is still debated, as in Zack Snyder's Justice League hype, or by it's fans/haters, and Joker continues to be very relevant today (Number 1 movie on HBO Max), both are incredible movies, which Holland's Spider Man movies are not.
Nah man the 3 spiderman are good but the one who deserved better was Andrew G, when you look at behind the scenes ,interviews you can really see that he wanted to make a good spiderman but the thing that sucks the most is that this movie had potential with great dialogue and great scenes but the company took over and ruined what could of been an equal to the other adaptations even though there some things that people hated which was the attitude of him but i understood why ,every teenager has different attitudes but in real life we all get this at some point in our life’s and peter skating like cmon a nerd can also skate but not in the comics of course .When they fired Andrew he was fucking sad but most of the fans didn’t care an example would be when they post a video or a photo of the 3 Spiderman everyone cheers for Tom and Tobey but Andrew is just left in the corner and to that i say #releasethewebbcut if the Snyder cut happened this can too.
Mysterio and Vulture are great, but they'd be much greater, on Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin and Alfred Molina's Doc Ock's level, if they weren't Iron Man haters.
@@bodd-energon5502 yup I feel like Tobey and Andrew will show Tom the way in the 3rd movie. I feel like Tom Holland's Spiderman will have some good character development
I like him for that reason he needs the tech because he's inexperienced which i like he's still growing people hate him for the wrong reasons also people dont like him because he can't fight alone even though Toby couldn't fight venom or sand man but I like him for that reason he can't fight alone like people they can't just do everything by them self they need help thats why I like him
@@eberhanicio7062 people don’t like him because he is inconsistent. In Civil War he showed he can fight and have a level of independence/motivations. In Hoco they killed my boy and turn him into iron man’s lil bitch smh.
Nope. No way home proved that Uncle Ben never even existed in Holland's universe. Not to mention Holland needed Tobey to stop him from becoming a murderer to avenge his aunt.
One of the most iconic aspects of Spider-man, and the reason why the 90's cartoon and Spectacular are my favorite versions, is that he's very well-spoken. Of course voice actors have the advantage there, given that they have to rely entirely on their voice and articulation, but still. Spider-man doesn't just "talk a lot". He's witty, and intelligent. He has a way with words. When he battles supervillains, he always has the upper hand verbally, and that's why the villain always gets pissed off. Not only because Spidey mocks them, but because he does it so well. It makes the villain feel smaller. Just like when a stand-up comedian schools a heckler, and the heckler feels embarrassed. The MCU Spider-man's dialogue is kinda dull. "Hey, suit-lady". "That's awesome". And bunch more "that's awesome". The few actual quips he says are pretty weak. "Hey, Big Bird", etc
Judging from No Way Home's conclusion. This aged like milk. Ya'll comic stans always crying that every effing movie adaptations has to be comic accurate are just whiney. MCU did great while having their own take and not 100% just be book accurate.
Your OPINION could be considered very valid. But I think now with the last movie in Tom's trilogy, it's more clearer how they were putting in place how they were going to bring their version of Peter Parker/Spiderman closer to the original origins in him being on his own and I for one think it's clever and original.
100% I absolutely LOVED Garfield as Spidey....I think he's the closest thing to comic book Spidey coming to life....its just that the writing for the actual movie plot and what not wasn't great...but Garfield's performance was great.
@@williambonilla3538 Less the writing, more studio interference. Marc Webb had a clear vision, and even in the first movie, that was altered by the studio. In the second, it just became too many plot points in too short a timeframe. And while there were some things I didn’t agree with (Peter buying his webbing off of Oscorp, telling Gwen his secret immediately, the way Uncle Ben’s death played out and how a deleted scene was better than the final cut)
I think one of the major reasons they didn't do the uncle ben moment is bc we got it like twice already in the previous movies. But I would like to see a flashback in no way home
I honestly hate when fans say. "We don't need Uncle Ben to die everytime we reboot the series." The death of Spider-Man & Batman's parental figures are integral to the characters philosophy and it undercuts the emotions of the audience when they are absent. These deaths are the moments that these characters realize that they can't be children no more and that they must protect the things they love. Including this makes for a better pay off when they actually do succeed and fail in the story, because we as the audience actually saw the moment they decided to "accept the power & responsibility"
@jaykinholmes7961 No Way Home is one of the worst films I've ever seen in my life. It's an awful movie that hinges on nostalgia. The only positives of it are from past films. It's just a bunch of cgi and nostalgia covering up shallow characters and a contrived plot.
When Tom was introduced in Civil War, I was super excited for his version of Spidey. That was a great representation of the character on screen in my opinion, and it was exactly what I wanted out of a performance of Spider-Man. But then in every subsequent movie, he’s just gotten less and less interesting as a character, and if anything more frustrating to watch as he strays further away from the character of Spidey. Even in Infinity War he was handled a lot better than in his solo films, but I’d put that down to the Russo brothers having a better understanding of the character and wanting to make a traditional version of him, hence their great set up of him in civil war which was shortly ruined by Homecoming. Far From Home was the closest we got, but that was still so far out (no pun intended). Hopefully in the new film he’ll be more on his way to becoming a more accurate depiction of the character. I’m hoping him meeting Tobey and Andrew’s spider-men will help him to understand what it takes to be a real one, and then hopefully for his next trilogy he’ll be a lot more of what we want from Spider-Man!
But let’s all be honest Spider-Man was better off with the Russo Brothers, for example in Civil War that was probably the best representation of Spiderman in the MCU than in his own movies
Andrew Garfield was my favorite spiderman. He captured the sarcastic and stand alone side of spiderman. Andrew Garfield was the Deadpool of the spiderman universe.
@@lockettmaverick different times different personalities. Andrew wouldn't act the same if he was spider when Tobey was in the time period he was in. Andrew was like he was Because of the time period he was in
Here after NWH and couldn’t be happier with the ending. They had to make a lot of changes to the character to fit him into the established universe that was building towards endgame and they did a great job with it. Now hopefully this fresh start can lead to a more accurate portrayal of Spider-Man that is fresh out of high school trying to make it on his own.
Fun fact: Uncle Ben doesn't play the Spider God figure in the comics he just dies. It's the raimi movies and the 90s show that did this. Harry and Gwen don't even appear until Peter is in COLLEGE
@@ADSNavarro because they both fill the roll of teenage superhero who makes jokes all the time I personally don't have a problem with it but some people do
@@VanillaTried 1st of all the Iron Man from the comics is an as****** 2nd if Peter actually lived in Iron Man's shadow, then he would've listened to every single thing Tony said to him, he risked everything to go after the Vulture, he never gave up until Tony ruined everything on him, and still went after the Vulture, 3rd the MCU Spider-Man is just a kid so if Tony gave him anything at all of course he will say yes, I mean, who on earth would reject something from Tony Stark 4th:fun fact :Peter and Tony had a pretty good relationship until civil war, he never despised Tony at all he just hated what he was doing and even after civil war, they worked it out eventually and another fun fact: who was the guy who carried Peter's dead body after his battle with morlun? That's right it was Iron Man
It really bothers me🙄😒 when people said they want a live action version of Miles even though he's already perfect in Spider-Verse but they don't count that about that just because it's an animated movie .
@@midnightstories6619 well IMO his acting his realistic since in 2, he feels worthless and his powers are failing, MJ doesnt love and neither does Harry, and his crying seems real too Tobey is best because his character feels real, and he has struggles and loses and he also heard some people died in the fire house scene at the top floor or something, and thats what made his motivation make sense, because he doesn't want anymore people to die
@@wayneshobbygallery john bubniak is the best spider-man, but hey tobey and andrew was better, and for tom it's just ok still wasn't good spider-man movie
That shit kinda pisses me off too. The statement “Tobey Maguire = Best Peter Parker, Andrew Garfield = Best Spider-Man, Tom Holland = Best at both.” It’s a lazy argument that most people use without even really explaining why they think so, and it’s a huge oversimplification. Peter Parker and Spider-Man aren’t separate personas like Bruce Wayne and Batman. Peter Parker and Spider-Man are nearly one and the same, so just please for crying out loud just choose who you think the best Spider-Man is and why you think so instead of saying all the other nonsense.
Civil War got it mostly right: Peter's talk with Tony really shows what Spiderman should be: one who is guilt ridden by his failings, but still tries to use his powers for good and fight for the little guy. He wasn't afraid to take on Falcon and Winter Soldier all while making witty wise cracks. But then in Homecoming he got scared of some random robber when he slammed car trunk shut? He desperately tries to prove himself to Tony and go on some major mission, when it was ESTABLISHED he wants to fight for random joe and keep the streets safe. Russo's had better grasp on what Spiderman should be.
That car trunk moment really was weird. The guy outright says Spider-Man isn’t scary, but Peter Parker can be very aggressive and at times scary. I mean even if you take his personality out of it he is literally based on one of the most common phobias.
@@wetdon591 Yet he fights a giant Vulture, Falcon and the Winter Soldier and Thanos. But a random joe shutting the boot of his car fast shocks him? come on
Me too Andrew Garfield's Spider-man was meant to be the normal Spider-man and Tom's Spider-man was meant to be from the Spider Verse it looks like The Amazing Spider-man and the Spectacular Spider-man were switched from their Universe.
Maybe he's a less accurate comic version, but honestly I found his movies the most entertaining, and that for me is alright, even if he ain't exactly the comic book accurate version....just my view.
What most people forget is that Peter Parker wasn't even in high-school for most of his original run in the comics (I think he graduated at around issue 28 or something).
Actually he graduated sooner. If I remember right. Cause the first big Goblin arc ends at issue 17, and Peter is a freshman in College there in that issue.
Why don't we just stop doing comparisons and just sit and enjoy the different take on the character. No matter how they started it destiny of every Spider-Man is same.
Anyone remembers Holland's quips? I barely remember since its quantity over quality unlike Garfield (i remember) and even the rare ones of Tobey's Spidey.
@Tobey is the best 2000 Okay I'm not gonna argue against you or change your opinion about Tom being iron boy jr but not all good things come in three like how rami's spiderman should've ended at the second movie but then we got third movie which was fucking terrible
@@crimsonspyder2388 How was the third movie terrible exactly? These are the things i heard whenever someone asks this question 1. "3 villains? Omg wtf??!? Thats too much they didnt build up the villains at all! Its a mess and a shit show" Okay, 3 villains is a lot, dont get me wrong, but they DID build up those characters and made them good villains. Harry got 2 movies prior to 3 where he got his character development and how he started becoming a villain, they just ended his arc in season 3. They also did build up eddie brock, he was jealous of peter and was suspicious of him cause he got all the best pics of spiderman, and then when the symbiote fell on him he became even more corrupted cause of the symbiote and decided to kill peter using his newfound powers. Sandman was also a great villain, we were shown his backstory and motives and how he got his powers. He did all he did for his daughter (this doesnt justify his actions tho), and regarding his powers, a lot of people said how stupid the scientists were for not checking first, and to that i say well imagine working overtime very late into the night you too couldnt be bothered to check, plus this was how he got his powers in the comics aswell so.. Every villains arc was started and ended perfectly, and it honestly didnt feel rushed. (If you'd like to argue otherwise, by all means go ahead im interested in what u think) 2. "Ew wtf why is peter acting all annoying, they didnt explain that at all! They failed to show us how the symbiote corrupted his mind, and made us feel like he became a jerk cause he likes his new suit and thinks its cool" They didnt fail to do that tho, it was all very obvious, peter is a nice dude and always was nice until he started wearing the symbiote suit, where he started acting more like a villain than a hero, and only when he took it off after realizing what its doing to him, he became normal again and when the symbiotes fell on eddie man became full on evil, if that doesnt explain it enough for you than idk what will. 3. "Organic webbing is just a stupid idea" Lets put aside that there was a version of spiderman in the comics with organic webbing, i think its a really cool idea to show us how the spider really affected peter, artifical webbing is cool and all but it just makes u think anyone can be spiderman if they stole those web devices. Like take captain america for example hes agile and pretty strong, give him web shooters (and if youre one of the people that believe peter puts a sticky substance on his suit so he can stick to walls after wearing it) and a spiderman suit and thats it he's spiderman. I think sam raimeis spiderman trilogy really shows us the negatives of being spiderman aswell as the positives. Neither of the other reboots showed us the actual hardships, other than 'oh i cant go to prom cause im spiderman :((('. Anyways im open for debating if youd like
I just want to put this right here, a lot of people say Tobey was a good Peter Parker, well, as someone who's read the comics, and watched the cartoons (90's animated series and The Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon) | have to say that Maguire was not a good Peter Parker at all. In fact, he was terrible. In the comics, Peter wasn't some spineless pushover who was afraid to talk to women. In the comics, Peter is charasmatic, has a spine, will confidently talk to women. When he met Mary Jane for the first time he was confidently flirting with her, and he has a sense of humor in and out of costume. There was a reason why he attracted Liz Allen, Betty Brant, Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane. Maguire's Peter was too afraid to talk to the girl that was living next door to him for years. In Amazing Fantasy #15 (Spider-Man's very first apperance) The comic shows him asking a girl out. Yes he gets rejected, but at least he had the confidence to go up and ask her. And this was before he got his powers and gained more confidence in himself. Pre-Spider powers comic Peter had more confidence than post power Maguire Spider.
@@jayngb no one's riding tobey , its just that where all confused on what the fuk this guy's point was for saying tom can do backflips too. Like Ok and the other guys do the same!!
Jeez i don't understand people this days. When mcu recreates uncle ben and Everything all over again its just exhausting.. honestly we don't need the most "accurate spiderman".. i mean "organic web" is accurate?? And going to be "comic accurate" will be just predictable as gwen dying in tasm2.
Agreed i mean everything doesn't need to be comic accurate i mean look what they did with thor! Everyone loved it when they changed it. Changing isn't always bad and ORIGINAL ISN'T always THE BEST!
I agree with your statement that it doesn't need to be comic accurate but I still can't help but feel like MCU's spiderman feels. off it doesn't feel. like. spiderman at all spiderman ps4 did way better potrayal of peter and spiderman I think it's because I always view spiderman as a independent and struggling hero who's doing what he's doing because of regret and a promise to his late uncle ben and seeing it being changed like how he's now a kid who looks up to Ironman and wants to be Spiderman to be just like him.. Change is good and all but that took away spiderman's charm because right now mcu spiderman feels like any normal teenager when they have a spiderman's power it lacks the peter parker's with great power comes great responsibility thinking that keeps him going as spiderman.
@@dij-rin4499 Yeah I was kinda hoping that realization peter will feel that with great power comes great responsibility I mean tom. holland really nailed the teen spiderman but the script tho..smh Take away the following on ironman's footsteps and focus more on his responsibility and bam the perfect potryal of spiderman they got the right actor,im fine with the non comic book accurate characters+ if they just got the whole purpose of why peter is spiderman that way this will feel more like spiderman and not iron man jr I just wish they went this route
He might not be accurate, but he’s still my favorite cause he just feels like spider man, he’s a teenager that does random and small acts of kindness and then he goes fighting with villains. And again who would like another uncle Ben DYING FOR THE THIRD TIME, so iron man is kind of better cause it makes spider man more important in the MCU. Basically what I’m saying is that, you don’t always gotta make movies very accurate to the comics, it’s just gets more boring and boring, try something new!
People need to stop saying Tom holland is the best Spider-Man as you stated he’s not a Spider-Man from the comics he’s just a awkward dude with powers his movies are good and to me he’s just a Spider-Man that tripped and fall into the portal which is mcu his movies are more on the side of what was Spider-Man doing when the avengers were kicking and taking names how are you going to have a Spider-Man movie without the Osborn’s Peter Parker best friend was always Harry and Mary Jane was always at the same school as Peter or lived in the same neighborhood flash Thompson was on the basketball team and now he’s a nerd that’s on the debate team
Personally, I always hated how Tom's Spider-Man fought. Quite the reason I can't get into it. It gets better with Garfield then Far from home fights was so much better. Am I the only one who felt that? But in drama, it gets worst. I do agree that MCU is Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker.
Everyone talking about how Gwen is Peter's first girlfriend while gigachads who read from the very start of the original Spider-man comics know that Betty Brant is his first GF.
fr gwen was his first true love, not gf. they were literally gonna get married right after the night gwen died (if she survived) sorry it's been over a year that I'm replying to this
For me, i feel in like MCU Spider-Man is the popular Iron-Bor Jr., looks like he never struggles, he never learn his mistakes, he's being too dependent on the others, he never learn something on his own and he doesn't have the great power comes great responsibility motivation for himself. I hope in No Way Home they shows some kind of a redemption arc for him and i just hate to say this but I really want to see him doing on his own and doing what's right necessary whenever it's personal or desperate in any situation. I just want see Peter Parker being relatable to his struggles in life and had a bad luck. That's how Stan Lee made the character for us to relate him.
Just because tobey doesn’t crack that many quips doesn’t mean he is not spider man. Do u really expect him to joke with such high stakes. All 3 actors got the basic traits of Peter Parker right, that being socially arwkward and nerdy but what really makes peter Parker is being an outsider and I can’t really say that about Tom when EVERYONE in his class is smart and nerdy, whereas with Toby he felt like a nerd and an outsider, which was literally established in the FIRST SCENE. And what really makeS Spider-Man is his duality and doing the right thing even though it means Peter Parker loses so spiderman and New York wins which happens in every rami movie. Tom Holland Spider-Man doesn’t feel like there is a duality and some of his reasons for being spider man aren’t about responsibility but becoming an avenger or living up to iron man which aren’t Spider-Mans morals. That’s why if u ask most people they will say Tobey is the best and most accurate Spider-Man, because when spiderman wins Peter loses and his problems are way more relatable. I like Tom as the mcu Spider-Man but I wouldn’t call him comic book accurate. He is a good spiderman for the mcu because all of the mcu movies are for UNIVERSE BUILDING but not an accurate Spider-Man coz Spider-Man doesn’t need other marvel characters to drive the story.
By the way ask your self this, spiderman is supposed to be the greatest hero in marvel, but if you only consider the mcu, would you really say that. Spider-Man is suppose to feel like someone who every one depends on, but he gets overshadowed and sometimes acts like a twelve year old. Spider-Man PS4 I a PERFECT example of how Spider-Man should be, and obviously spectacular spider man. Just compare them to MCU Spider-Man?
@@AM-bq4ki Ok so you are one of the people who don't get it, ok. You want Spider-Man to come into an already established universe and basically steal the build up of Iron Man's arc, because at the time, Iron Man was filling that spot for the whole significance of his character and RDJ's charisma. He was the center of that universe. You want Spider-Man to be that without him earning it, so basically you wanted Captain Marvel. It's the first time that any franchise takes every aspect of the character into account instead of giving you everything at once. He's supposed to earn everything that makes him great. and right now he's earned his place as the Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, he's earned his place as the one man Avengers army he's always been. He is supposed to feel overshadowed, cause he is. He's always been overshadowed, he's supposed to earn his place. You know why Spider-Man PS4 works so well despite living in a similar universe to Tom's? Because he had 8 years to earn his place as a superhero. You know why Spectacular Spider-Man works? Because he's the only superhero in that universe. The whole universe is obviously gonna fall into his shoulders. Tom is surrounded by superheroes that were there before him, just like Peter Parker in the Ultimate comics (and yes I can defend that). People in those comics say the same thing about Spider-Man that you're saying right now about Tom Holland Spider-Man. All of the things you mention make Spider-Man great do happen, but people omit these things in order to serve their narrative. I won't say that people are blinded by nostalgia to judge the Raimi movies as great, because they are. But they are blinded when it comes to analyzing these movies, because the things that they want are there they just don't want to see it, A LOT of other people do, I don't get why you don't. I really want people to see what I see
@@ADSNavarro Tobey a spider man saving the world some the best movie in marvel history Andrew a great peter parker he fits so well the amazing spider man forever they both fight for the people they both work solo toby just as to fix irons mans problem since when was vulture a iron man villain ??if you read the comics vulture dont even know who iron man is and they story of mistoryo I dont know who to spell his name is shit mistoryo never worked for iron man he was more of a spider person what's next Sony and marvel you gonna ruined dr Octopus next or green goblin
It’s the other way around, the avengers have asked spidey to join their team multiple times and he’s turned them down bc he likes working alone and just isn’t that big of a fan of them, (other then when Bendis had him join which wasn’t the best move but still) he doesn’t wanna be on a team, he wants to keep to himself, he’s the Everyman hero
He doesn't even need to be in the MCU anyway. The MCU is just overrated they ruined spiderman I just want to see spiderman out of the MCU and doing his own movies.
Oh yeah you are those one of those strict "I dont like change" type of people. I'm sure your opinion hasn't changed after a year. but it's like you hang your opinion over every other person's opinion.
It’s obvious your one of the people who grew up with old Spider-Man and your crying because they did something new. It’s way better then the old plain and boring performances and out-dated animation. Spider-Man makes jokes all the times in the comics, he’s serious when he needs to be. Tom Holland is the best Spider-Man.
@Standard Yip So I take it your biased about Toby/Andrew/ultimate boring performance ok well ultimate boring performance sequels is coming ou-Oh wait...
I’m sick of people complaining about Tom Holland Spider-Man not being comic accurate what you don’t realise is they tried a different approach on the character
@@ATalesTruth- I've always felt that the new spider man was bad. That he was a kid, didn't really act like a hero etc. . now I think that's exactly what they were going for. We got to watch a kid develop over the span of like 4 movies. Rather than rushing it with a single movie. Like I said I didn't like Tom hallnd, but after no way home that changed. I realized in each movie it was a recurring theme of "your just a kid". This movie gave him his uncle Ben moment and finally gave him responsibility. He even lets go of his friends because he now understand the weight of that responsibility. Anyways that's my rant for nwh.
@@sceplecture2382 the problem is if they said the origin already happen before civil war as we all know it to be They wouldn’t need to dumb down his character to build him back up again In other words we could have gotten the new trilogy as the first trilogy from the get go Plus it’s stupid for them to dumb down his character to begin with, essentially we got a 3 film origin story when people didn’t want to see the origin We could ahve gotten a offscreen origin not even 3 minutes worth telling us he gets the responsibility lesson in civil war Essentially 3 minutes offscreen origin vs a 3 film origin If they had any brains and creativity they would have made stories where peter actually acted like Spider-Man and not this dumbed down version
People don't give Andrew Garfield enough credit... He was amazing...
(No pun intended)
I grew up with Tobey's Spiderman but God damn, I love Andrew's Spiderman
Had they started the Amazing Spider-Man films with Him in College it would've solved a lot of issues.
Hell nah he was a cocky jock version of spiderman
@@jynxyouowemeasoda5066 well he was cocky in the ultimate spider man comics 🤨
@@VanillaTried as Spider-Man he was a joker and as Peter he wasn't cocky
Taking Peter Parke's struggles is like taking away Steve Rogers moral dilemmas
But they didn't take them away lol, it's the opposite
@@NUKCYNDv ??? He is the most privileged spiderman ever he had everything handed to his ass on a silver platter and even then before his life with aunt may was financially stable
@@trinity9708 Ehh, nope; you are right on the financial thing, but he had a lot of struggles(He is not privileged at all); the death of Iron Man, he literally died, he doesn't know how to be responsible, he doesn't know how to deal with a double life, he doesn't how to be a hero, he doesn't know how to live with all that pressure, etc
@@NUKCYNDv he doesn’t need to know how to live a double life because everyone he loves knows and supports his double life, tony handed him stark industries on a silver platter
Spiderman DOES now how to be responsible it’s kind of his thing and this peter is just a happy go lucky kid who gave the glasses his mentor gave him to a guy he knew for 2 days everything peter does goes good for him, he gets the hot chicks without struggle he goes to a super genius school where everyone loves him and even his bully gets bullied for being a loser everything is handed to this kid, he is not spiderman
I'm so glad people are finally accepting andrew garfield as a good spiderman. Hes always been my favorite, tobey is a close second though
He is a good spiderman but he's very underrated
I agree. I got so much shit about thinking he was better than maguire and holland. It’s nice to see that I wasn’t the only one. No offense to holland,but I don’t care for his Spider-Man at all.
he is a very (accurate) spider-man, thats why i love it and tobey amazing too, just everything but toms spiderman!
funfact: Andrews Spider-man was actually based of the 00s Ultimate Spider-man..
@@SPXJUICE75facts
I remember watching The Amazing Spiderman and liking Garfield's version of him. I always thought of Spiderman as a wisecracking jerk that grows into the hero role. But apparently he's the one alot of people don't like. But it's whatever, different for everyone.
Spider-Man not only wisecrack and annoys his enemies but he'll straight up roast them just to throw them off their game which is why I like Andrew's Spider-Man too. I can let his hipster Peter Parker slide because he does show knowledge in science and tech but it's still more accurate than Tom's iron boy jr who only wants to impress Mr. Stark, gets everything handed to him and suffers little consequences for his actions.
Toby Maguires version has better MEMES than any other spiderman.
Facts
Uh, Peter B. Parker from Spider Verse, anyone?
@invincible. oh we're specifically talking live action. Got it, and sorry.
Yeah xd
Your speaking the facts
The fact that iron man gave him the og suit was kinda depressing
Ikr
@@PeterParker-iy4vs hey Peter, how's your day?
@@peddy911Still haven't paid rent
@@peddy911 Merry Christmas!!❤
@@PeterParker-iy4vs merry Christmas too Peter!.
For me.
Andrew garfield is the most accurate. The suits, the jokes, the struggles, nerd, realistic, but a little bit cool Peter. But still the most accurate for me. Though bad story because of weird/akward electro and green goblin with the death of gwen stacy. The healthy relationship between Peter and gwen is a great twist. Mj is the best for me but if they didn't kill gwen, I'd stick with her.
Tobey is the same also. But he's more nerdy and less jokes. And has really toxic relationship with mj. But still a accurate and great spiderman.
Tom Holland is a great actor. But the accuracy is just meh. I was really excited about his movie when it first came out. But after watching it and the sequels. It's boring. I don't know men, it doesn't feel like spiderman. He's more like a "what if". What if spider man became Tony stark's sidekick.
Overall. The best spiderman is still the one from the Ps4 and the spider verse.
Ahh yes the jokes when in TASM2 it's resulting in people dying WHAT A HERO
Idk if you ever read the comics but peter had a toxic relationship with MJ before the got married in '75 (? Can't remember correctly). Tbh the best Spiderman title belongs to 2 versions: Spectacular spiderman and Miles Morales from Into the spider verse
Really there's no "most accurate" version of spiderman in movies bc they all had parts of the character just wrong lemme run down the flaws in each version of spiderman:
Tobey is too much of a loser as spiderman. Peter Parker is supposed to be a loser even after becoming spiderman but Tobey idk had no confidence. Also everybody forgets Tobey punched flash. thats inexcusable. Major flaw right there. Less jokes no quips. Great peter Parker, even tho he took it to the extreme he's still prolly the best? Not a good spiderman tho
Garfield had the best quips hands down. But his spiderman is really stupid, ESPECIALLY in the origin. He becomes Spiderman for revenge and let's criminals go bc they aren't his uncle's killer. It takes him over half of the movie to save someone and realize "oh i should save people". Comic book Spiderman always had in him to save people. He went after Ben's killer yeah but not as a vigilante like Garfield's spiderman did. The most comic book accurate "revenge seeking" peter Parker was Tobey's. Also in that first scene of Amazing spiderman he makes jokes and lets rhino plow through the city which let's be honest prolly killed people. Like he had a whole knock knock joke. Horrible character writing. Peter showing off his powers in HS was stupid. In the comics he thought Abt it but never did anything. garfield is the best actor out of everyone tho! Just ruined by stupid writing
Lastly Holland
The video explained everything basically he gets everything handed to him. even his own suit is handed to him. Actually that goes against peter Parker from comics that eventually gave up the iron spider bc it was to us not his
@@carrot7215 Tobey is more accurate then your suggesting also Tom getting giving everything... I swear to god people never watched those movies and make up stuff
@@raidoukuzonoha883 no. Tobey had the most dialed down version of Spiderman, and the most extreme version of peter Parker. Garfield had the most dialed down version of peter Parker but the most extreme spiderman. Holland met in the middle but had the worst spiderman world and supporting cast ever. Like come on they kinda went opposite of what peter is. All three Spidermen have issues that balance themselves out. You can't say Tobey's better because his spiderman is the worst of the three. You can't say Garfield's spidey is better bc his peter is the worst. You can't say Holland is the best bc he has the worst writing and motivation of the three. As well as the worst world/supporting cast
Tobey had many issues just remove your nostalgia goggles and see for yourself. He took the awkward part to the extreme. Comics peter was never THAT awkward. He is so awkward that his spiderman lacks any confidence and quips that MAKES SPIDERMAN. He was a good peter Parker that did what other iterations didn't do and showed his desire to help others and that peter Parker was always a good hearted person. That doesn't excuse all his flaws tho. Doesn't excuse the fact that this spiderman has near zero quips, doesn't excuse the power inconsistency from this spiderman, doesn't excuse bad acting either. Doesn't excuse the fact that he fought flash. He punched flash. We got great memes tho!
Also i grew up on the trilogy and watch spiderman 2 almost every other week. I can recite dialogue from the first 5 minutes of the first movie perfectly from how much i watched it. Again I'm just not biased.
@@carrot7215 Miles in spiderverse is just better than the comic version
You could say Tom hollands Spider-Man is far from accurate.
Lol
Spider-Man: Far From Accurate
@@SuperRamtin it needs HOME
Nah most accurate second from tobey
He's the goat
@@ncs-nightcore3729
Im guessing your a person who doesn't
read marvel comics and knows nothing about spidermans charcter
MCU just tried waaay to hard to be different. No uncle Ben, MJ isn’t MJ, Ned isn’t Ned, Aunt May is younger and loved by every man.
They Replace Harry With Ned.
I think they had to because Sony owns it not MCU so they can't bring comic characters like the comics
@@angels8920 sony payed for the production of the film and partnered with mcu. They had access to every Spider-Man character, but they chose not to use them.
they tryed to sell mcu universe trough spider-man fuck off i want spider-man not publicity to mcu
Peter isn’t peter
Tom is essentially a White Miles Morales. They literally rewrote Ned to be the spitting image of Ganke. Tobey and Andrew are way more comic accurate Peter Parkers than Tom will ever be. I just hope Marvel can see this through and finally let Peter eventually become his own hero in the MCU. I never thought I’d say this, but he’s better off with Sony.
Agreed. It always annoys me when people claim that Tom is the most comic accurate Spider-Man just because he interacts with the Avengers, looks like a high schooler, and makes jokes...Spider-Man isn't tied down by the Avengers and there's a lot more to his character then just being a high schooler and cracking a few Jokes.
Yeah, i'd rather Spiderman go back to sony and just do his own movies without the MCU I hate what they did to the character.
@#MyGacha_ _Universe Congratulations! you completely misunderstood the point.
@@gamingstuff9396 yup agreed spiderman has now appeared in 5 mcu films still doesn't know how to fight and needs stark tech to get an advantage and in no way home a suit made by strange with magic Hollands spiderman needs help every film it's downright now and criminal the MCU in Disney has a bad habit of nerfing they are heroes hulk was completely nerfed into the laughing stock and game they made Thor fat and was playing fortnite in my opinion Andrew is the most comic accurate then Toby
You shouldn't actually say 'ever be' it's more like 'has ever been'
Watching this after No Way Home, it’s like Marvel knew that MCU Spider-Man wasn’t the real Spider-Man, so they set out to fix him in the most perfect way possible
That why they had to fan change some things to MCU spiderman like a comic accurate suit, no one knows who Peter parker is as spiderman and now he's alone
It was planned. If you watch interviews with Jon Watts and even their recent video, it proves that this was all planned. Jon Watts even said back in 2017 that he lowered the stakes and consequences in the first films because he wanted them to be fun at first, therefore meaning he was saving this for Spider-Man 3..all of this was planned.
not really.
The version with Tobey is the most accurate, it isn't even a competition, Tobey has blue eyes and the appearance of the comic character. MJ being a redhead played by Dunst is accurate to the real comic character, even Jameson looks ridiculously like the real comic character. The first spiderman movie with Tobey Maguire probably will never be beaten in how realistic it is towards the lore and even appearance of the comics. MCU itself isn't really accurate with anything, plus it's owned by Disney, it's mostly just about cracking culture related jokes and trying to be inclusive to various peoples to attempt to expand it's market reach. MCU is essentially like a business model, where as Tobey Maguire's spiderman was a true movie trying to make a live action version of Marvel's spiderman.
Yeah, can’t argue with this.
Agreed
Tobey is kinda like the Earth 616 version of Spiderman and Andrew is the Ultimate comics spiderman version
@@icarus_walkthroughs you got it backwards, and i dont know how because youre in the comment section of a video that points out how that statement would be backwards
@@MUIDYLANICE bruh andrew was inspired by the Ultimate Comics spiderman 💀
Peter “Benjamin” Parker. Uncle Ben is literally in his name. Benjamin being his middle name isn’t just because it’s a middle name. It’s because he’s the whole reason Peter is who he is. Ben is the centre of his universe, the sun he revolves around. The person that keeps him going.
MCU has not a Spiderman,it has a Iron Boy who even hit by shocker.
@@thedamndoor45 facts, tom holland spiderman is just a side kick of ironman, it's even an insult to spiderman to call him spiderman, ironboy is better 🤣
You don't have a SHRED of evidence to point to Ben's existence in the MCU.
nah aunt may keeps him going but uncle ben is his rock but u could argue that aunt may is his rock
it's just Tom Holland's Spider-Man doesn't feel like Spidey.. would be more better if Andrew Garfield was in the MCU
Honestly, Garfield's version is the most comic accurate. Peter is a jackass when he first started out as spiderman in the comics. He literally said "The world can hang for all I care." So Garfield is a great Peter Parker and a great Spiderman
I agree. From the last 3 spiderman reboots Garfield is the most accurate, also director Mark Webb did an excellent job and the writers, for the quality jokes and story.
@Clown_prince_of_Carnage Hudson I really hope actors do not get too old for spider-verse movie which
would be great
i agree garfield's spiderman is a accurate in terms of development.
where as tobey is the most accurate peter parker with all of his struggle with life and taking on his responsibility on being spiderman even though tobey's spiderman can be a asshole as well remember when he let the robber get away with the money and is one of the reasons why uncle ben died by the hands of sandman by accident.
@Clown_prince_of_Carnage Hudson i see but overall.
andrew - spiderman
tobey - peter parker
tom - iron boy jr
@Clown_prince_of_Carnage Hudson very well said mate.
so THAT is why tom holland still feels like spider-man despite not being a very accurate Peter at all. he's like miles' spider-man.
Tobey: most comic accurate
Andrew: most realistic
Tom: the only one who looks and sounds like a teenager
Cuz he is in his early 20s lmao at the time of Homecoming.
Rn after NWH, he is 25 and the most comic accurate Spidey.
Even in the Joker they still did the Bruce Wayne parents getting killed.
yeah but nobody cares about that, it's fun to bash on bvs. That movie is still relevant 4 years later, nobody is talking about Joker anymore
@@kobe8915 i dont see anyone talking about BvS anymore, Joker related videos (recreations, etc) are still being made to this day.
@Amedeo Isoldi when has Joker not been relevant anymore?
@@rnspurgn3015 exactly, never
Both are astonishing wrong. BvS is still debated, as in Zack Snyder's Justice League hype, or by it's fans/haters, and Joker continues to be very relevant today (Number 1 movie on HBO Max), both are incredible movies, which Holland's Spider Man movies are not.
This actor deserves better. He should fight spiderman villains, not "I hate Tony Stark so I'll take it out on you".
Nah man the 3 spiderman are good but the one who deserved better was Andrew G, when you look at behind the scenes ,interviews you can really see that he wanted to make a good spiderman but the thing that sucks the most is that this movie had potential with great dialogue and great scenes but the company took over and ruined what could of been an equal to the other adaptations even though there some things that people hated which was the attitude of him but i understood why ,every teenager has different attitudes but in real life we all get this at some point in our life’s and peter skating like cmon a nerd can also skate but not in the comics of course .When they fired Andrew he was fucking sad but most of the fans didn’t care an example would be when they post a video or a photo of the 3 Spiderman everyone cheers for Tom and Tobey but Andrew is just left in the corner and to that i say #releasethewebbcut if the Snyder cut happened this can too.
@@swlol I need your comment at a Million Likes because Andrew Loves Spider-Man And They really Did him Wrong.
@@blairomani yea its sad, Andrew deserved more he is so underrated
Mysterio and Vulture are great, but they'd be much greater, on Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin and Alfred Molina's Doc Ock's level, if they weren't Iron Man haters.
@@bodd-energon5502 yup I feel like Tobey and Andrew will show Tom the way in the 3rd movie. I feel like Tom Holland's Spiderman will have some good character development
Tobey is my favourite Spider-Man and Peter Parker especially
Pizza Time
Tobey Maguire’s Spiderman: very iconic
Andrew Garfield’s Spiderman: kinda cool
Tom Holland’s Spiderman: Soldier + Iron man
I love Tom Holland’s spider man but they made so techyish peter is supposed to be making his own suit not some suit made by stark
i mean he did technically make his own suit in far from home
@@sproutbeans4410 still from stark's tech..
@@sproutbeans4410 he just customized it lol, like he was just selecting the toppings of an ice cream
I like him for that reason he needs the tech because he's inexperienced which i like he's still growing people hate him for the wrong reasons also people dont like him because he can't fight alone even though Toby couldn't fight venom or sand man but I like him for that reason he can't fight alone like people they can't just do everything by them self they need help thats why I like him
@@eberhanicio7062 people don’t like him because he is inconsistent. In Civil War he showed he can fight and have a level of independence/motivations. In Hoco they killed my boy and turn him into iron man’s lil bitch smh.
I speak for all the real fans when I say "The comic books do matter"
Thank god u exist (no seriously u saved me)😁
Of course, it's the source material...Or it used to be! 😒😒
@@dorjiwang9467 Tom isn't like Spider-Man.
@@dorjiwang9467 No, it's not.
@@dorjiwang9467 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
After watching no way home Tom holand is just as spider man as the other two if not more
Nope. No way home proved that Uncle Ben never even existed in Holland's universe. Not to mention Holland needed Tobey to stop him from becoming a murderer to avenge his aunt.
@@thestrong2401 ok? He’s still just like Andrew and tobey now. His journey was just different 🤷♂️
@@thestrong2401 ....and tobey literally killed the guy who killed uncle ben.
@@nanand.rhe never killed him he fell by himself
One of the most iconic aspects of Spider-man, and the reason why the 90's cartoon and Spectacular are my favorite versions, is that he's very well-spoken. Of course voice actors have the advantage there, given that they have to rely entirely on their voice and articulation, but still. Spider-man doesn't just "talk a lot". He's witty, and intelligent. He has a way with words. When he battles supervillains, he always has the upper hand verbally, and that's why the villain always gets pissed off. Not only because Spidey mocks them, but because he does it so well. It makes the villain feel smaller. Just like when a stand-up comedian schools a heckler, and the heckler feels embarrassed.
The MCU Spider-man's dialogue is kinda dull. "Hey, suit-lady". "That's awesome". And bunch more "that's awesome". The few actual quips he says are pretty weak. "Hey, Big Bird", etc
I agree
That's an awesome comment.
Also... This is a really good point.
@@Danhec95 what about the spiderman ps4 peter parker and the spiderverse peter parker??
Tobey is more like 616 verison, Andrew is more like Ultimate verison of Peter Parker and Tom is Miles Morales with Ned Leeds looking like Ganke Lee.
Nah miles Morales better fit than tom
@@JayDen-ok2qv That's what I say...I feel like we have no need for Peter or his friends to be in high school anymore now that we have Miles Morales.
Fr that's what I'm saying
Nailed it
Why… is this kinda true..
andrew is also very ultimate spider-man peter when it comes to comics
Facts especially ultimate Rhino
True hes a big douche in the begining just like the comics
We would love to see Andrew in the ps4 suit And tobey In the Spiderman last suit. Agree?
Judging from No Way Home's conclusion. This aged like milk. Ya'll comic stans always crying that every effing movie adaptations has to be comic accurate are just whiney. MCU did great while having their own take and not 100% just be book accurate.
Your statement is factual
Your OPINION could be considered very valid.
But I think now with the last movie in Tom's trilogy, it's more clearer how they were putting in place how they were going to bring their version of Peter Parker/Spiderman closer to the original origins in him being on his own and I for one think it's clever and original.
Why are people using this video's comment section to blindly hate on MCU Spiderman?
Andrew garfield's portrayal is my fav imo, the swinging the acting the quips etc, they just botched the story in other parts
100% I absolutely LOVED Garfield as Spidey....I think he's the closest thing to comic book Spidey coming to life....its just that the writing for the actual movie plot and what not wasn't great...but Garfield's performance was great.
My favorite is Andrew
@@williambonilla3538 Less the writing, more studio interference. Marc Webb had a clear vision, and even in the first movie, that was altered by the studio. In the second, it just became too many plot points in too short a timeframe. And while there were some things I didn’t agree with (Peter buying his webbing off of Oscorp, telling Gwen his secret immediately, the way Uncle Ben’s death played out and how a deleted scene was better than the final cut)
@@moviehermit5631 Oh, he used the wires from Oscorp to make the webbing, but your point still sgands
Nah he sucks
Andrew's spidey AND Peter was the most comic accurate. As a comic reader I can vouch for this.
Lol
I agree with you
you're 100 percent correct.
YES
100%
I think one of the major reasons they didn't do the uncle ben moment is bc we got it like twice already in the previous movies. But I would like to see a flashback in no way home
But now without it there would be no emotion connection to that character.
So what we got it twice? The death of uncle ben is important to Spider-Man's characters and philosophy
He is now after NWH
Wow, green goblin wasn’t lying. A good few maguire fans did turn on him
It's good to have nostalgia but for now Tom is the spiderman
@@midnightstories6619 Hopefully he learns how to be spider-man instead of iron man. Maybe Maguire can show him the ropes
@@ultimateslinger9857 Let's hope that happens in the next movie. Also, there are rumours that Tobey and Andrew will also be in it...
@@midnightstories6619 I’d love it if both were in it
@@ultimateslinger9857 Yes let's hope that'll happen in No Way Home
I honestly hate when fans say.
"We don't need Uncle Ben to die everytime we reboot the series."
The death of Spider-Man & Batman's parental figures are integral to the characters philosophy and it undercuts the emotions of the audience when they are absent. These deaths are the moments that these characters realize that they can't be children no more and that they must protect the things they love. Including this makes for a better pay off when they actually do succeed and fail in the story, because we as the audience actually saw the moment they decided to "accept the power & responsibility"
Now this didn’t age well after no way home did it
@James Sturm yeah a lot of these comments didn’t age too well
@jaykinholmes7961 No Way Home is one of the worst films I've ever seen in my life.
It's an awful movie that hinges on nostalgia. The only positives of it are from past films. It's just a bunch of cgi and nostalgia covering up shallow characters and a contrived plot.
@@improbablyyourdad8458Agree, that film saved by tobey and andrew lmao
When Tom was introduced in Civil War, I was super excited for his version of Spidey. That was a great representation of the character on screen in my opinion, and it was exactly what I wanted out of a performance of Spider-Man.
But then in every subsequent movie, he’s just gotten less and less interesting as a character, and if anything more frustrating to watch as he strays further away from the character of Spidey. Even in Infinity War he was handled a lot better than in his solo films, but I’d put that down to the Russo brothers having a better understanding of the character and wanting to make a traditional version of him, hence their great set up of him in civil war which was shortly ruined by Homecoming. Far From Home was the closest we got, but that was still so far out (no pun intended).
Hopefully in the new film he’ll be more on his way to becoming a more accurate depiction of the character. I’m hoping him meeting Tobey and Andrew’s spider-men will help him to understand what it takes to be a real one, and then hopefully for his next trilogy he’ll be a lot more of what we want from Spider-Man!
Difference between Russo brothers and Jon Watts
Andrew Garfield is probably the best Spider-Man
But let’s all be honest Spider-Man was better off with the Russo Brothers, for example in Civil War that was probably the best representation of Spiderman in the MCU than in his own movies
yeah the russo brothers did better with spiderman than jon watts did
Preach it!!
I’m telling you we need the russo brothers to direct spider-man 4
@@bmitch1834 bruh im honestly scared whats john watss gonna do with fantastic 4
@@21duncanhoops85 he’s prob gonna turn it into a big joke😬
Andrew Garfield was my favorite spiderman. He captured the sarcastic and stand alone side of spiderman. Andrew Garfield was the Deadpool of the spiderman universe.
As Spider-man should be.
i always see spiderman as the family-friendly version of deadpool & this new spiderman is just messed up
@@lockettmaverick different times different personalities. Andrew wouldn't act the same if he was spider when Tobey was in the time period he was in.
Andrew was like he was Because of the time period he was in
Here after NWH and couldn’t be happier with the ending. They had to make a lot of changes to the character to fit him into the established universe that was building towards endgame and they did a great job with it. Now hopefully this fresh start can lead to a more accurate portrayal of Spider-Man that is fresh out of high school trying to make it on his own.
Fun fact: Uncle Ben doesn't play the Spider God figure in the comics he just dies. It's the raimi movies and the 90s show that did this.
Harry and Gwen don't even appear until Peter is in COLLEGE
ive been saying for years mcu spider-man is just a rip off Miles Morales
Exactly
They were trying to have him appeal to a younger audience
Omg yess!!
Please explain why, because I think it's not true
@@ADSNavarro because they both fill the roll of teenage superhero who makes jokes all the time I personally don't have a problem with it but some people do
I hate how they made him a Iron man sidekick. I forgot about that scene in TASM
A sidekick? He was never a sidekick he was always his own hero
@@swordchannelfires his own hero in the shadow of iron man.
And fun fact: spider man despised tony as a human being in the comics.
@@VanillaTried 1st of all the Iron Man from the comics is an as******
2nd if Peter actually lived in Iron Man's shadow, then he would've listened to every single thing Tony said to him, he risked everything to go after the Vulture, he never gave up until Tony ruined everything on him, and still went after the Vulture,
3rd the MCU Spider-Man is just a kid so if Tony gave him anything at all of course he will say yes, I mean, who on earth would reject something from Tony Stark
4th:fun fact :Peter and Tony had a pretty good relationship until civil war, he never despised Tony at all he just hated what he was doing and even after civil war, they worked it out eventually and another fun fact: who was the guy who carried Peter's dead body after his battle with morlun? That's right it was Iron Man
@@swordchannelfires ong
@@VanillaTriedin ultimate didn’t he work alongside him
*manical laughter in the future*
OH BOY DO I HAVE A SURPRISE FOR YOU
*sobbing*
It really bothers me🙄😒 when people said they want a live action version of Miles even though he's already perfect in Spider-Verse but they don't count that about that just because it's an animated movie .
I love Tobey Maguire’s spidey. He’s just the best.
The only time he was the best was when he became Bully Maguire. Rest of the time his acting was pretty subtle and plain...
@@midnightstories6619 The acting maybe, but there is more to the character than the way he's acted.
@@martinchuma True, I loved the way he portrayed the character of spiderman
@@midnightstories6619 well IMO his acting his realistic since in 2, he feels worthless and his powers are failing, MJ doesnt love and neither does Harry, and his crying seems real too
Tobey is best because his character feels real, and he has struggles and loses and he also heard some people died in the fire house scene at the top floor or something, and thats what made his motivation make sense, because he doesn't want anymore people to die
@@Axtreq Yes, I never said I hate him. Excited for him to come back in no way home along with andrew and tom...
Tobey to me was the best Spider-Man. Andrew was one of mine when I was really young. Tom, I love him I just wish it was more accurate to the comics.
wth we have both the same opinions.
I have the same opinion too
Couldn't agree more. I wish everyone will say the same like u. Instead, they're completely biased & unable to feel optimistic & reasonable.
@@wayneshobbygallery john bubniak is the best spider-man, but hey tobey and andrew was better, and for tom it's just ok still wasn't good spider-man movie
@@DanteAlighieri612 Same goes to me, but I didn't grow up watching John Bubniak's version 😅
Tom holland destroyed spiderman
Toby was the best
That shit kinda pisses me off too. The statement “Tobey Maguire = Best Peter Parker, Andrew Garfield = Best Spider-Man, Tom Holland = Best at both.” It’s a lazy argument that most people use without even really explaining why they think so, and it’s a huge oversimplification. Peter Parker and Spider-Man aren’t separate personas like Bruce Wayne and Batman. Peter Parker and Spider-Man are nearly one and the same, so just please for crying out loud just choose who you think the best Spider-Man is and why you think so instead of saying all the other nonsense.
@BroFist you call that a long essay??
Civil War got it mostly right: Peter's talk with Tony really shows what Spiderman should be: one who is guilt ridden by his failings, but still tries to use his powers for good and fight for the little guy. He wasn't afraid to take on Falcon and Winter Soldier all while making witty wise cracks.
But then in Homecoming he got scared of some random robber when he slammed car trunk shut? He desperately tries to prove himself to Tony and go on some major mission, when it was ESTABLISHED he wants to fight for random joe and keep the streets safe.
Russo's had better grasp on what Spiderman should be.
That car trunk moment really was weird. The guy outright says Spider-Man isn’t scary, but Peter Parker can be very aggressive and at times scary. I mean even if you take his personality out of it he is literally based on one of the most common phobias.
@@danielwood6833 what? you realise hes still peter parker, a 16 year old right?
@@wetdon591 Yet he fights a giant Vulture, Falcon and the Winter Soldier and Thanos. But a random joe shutting the boot of his car fast shocks him? come on
@@danielwood6833 wow he flinched sooooo bad
@@wetdon591 I said it was weird not bad. And I wasn't even the one who originally made the point.
I always said that Tom Holland’s spider-man should be a spider-man from an alternate universe. Thats how i look at it
It is already though
But do you want this to be main stream no then that’s the point in criticism
Me too Andrew Garfield's Spider-man was meant to be the normal Spider-man and Tom's Spider-man was meant to be from the Spider Verse it looks like The Amazing Spider-man and the Spectacular Spider-man were switched from their Universe.
After no way home, I think we are heading in a good direction
Maybe he's a less accurate comic version, but honestly I found his movies the most entertaining, and that for me is alright, even if he ain't exactly the comic book accurate version....just my view.
See every time I comment something like that people like attack me for not caring if it’s not that comic book accurate
You know who's the best Spider-Man?
Nicholas Cage
agreed
Hell yeah brother
agreed
Y O U H A R D B O I L E D T U R T L E S L A P P E R
He's also the best batman
What most people forget is that Peter Parker wasn't even in high-school for most of his original run in the comics (I think he graduated at around issue 28 or something).
People just see what's said on the internet and run with it.
Actually he graduated sooner. If I remember right. Cause the first big Goblin arc ends at issue 17, and Peter is a freshman in College there in that issue.
Yeah, I read those a while back, he wasn’t a high schooler for long, thats why I like Tobey’s Spider-Man 1
Why don't we just stop doing comparisons and just sit and enjoy the different take on the character. No matter how they started it destiny of every Spider-Man is same.
Tom hollands spidi is jsut milee morales
Spoilers: after no way home this is no longer the case
Tasm car thief scene always makes me laugh I was shocked when you put this in the video
@Charles Parrino the sequel had it's moments but the sequel should have had fixed its pacing
Anyone remembers Holland's quips? I barely remember since its quantity over quality unlike Garfield (i remember) and even the rare ones of Tobey's Spidey.
He's trash, Andrew did way better. The acting alone by Andrew eclipses that of Tom's
Facts!! 💯
True
Hey hey Tobey, Andrew, Tom are great actors... They put their 100% into their roles
@@LokeshKumar-zc8mv Tom is a great actor true but it's just his Spider-Man character that is completely TRASH
@@Mozfu yes.... You are goddamn right! (heisenberg)
Not only is the ultimate story closer to tobey the raimi movies are canon in the ultimate universe
Before watching No Way Home:
I definitely agree
After watching No Way Home:
*I humbly disagree*
Toby Maguire is the only spidy I need
Then your only gonna have three live action Spider-man movies that's all
@@crimsonspyder2388 ?
@@corue Well I meant that if Tobey was the only Spider-man he needs, then he only needs three movies because that's all Tobey has as Spider-man
@Tobey is the best 2000 Okay I'm not gonna argue against you or change your opinion about Tom being iron boy jr but not all good things come in three like how rami's spiderman should've ended at the second movie but then we got third movie which was fucking terrible
@@crimsonspyder2388 How was the third movie terrible exactly?
These are the things i heard whenever someone asks this question
1. "3 villains? Omg wtf??!? Thats too much they didnt build up the villains at all! Its a mess and a shit show"
Okay, 3 villains is a lot, dont get me wrong, but they DID build up those characters and made them good villains.
Harry got 2 movies prior to 3 where he got his character development and how he started becoming a villain, they just ended his arc in season 3.
They also did build up eddie brock, he was jealous of peter and was suspicious of him cause he got all the best pics of spiderman, and then when the symbiote fell on him he became even more corrupted cause of the symbiote and decided to kill peter using his newfound powers.
Sandman was also a great villain, we were shown his backstory and motives and how he got his powers. He did all he did for his daughter (this doesnt justify his actions tho), and regarding his powers, a lot of people said how stupid the scientists were for not checking first, and to that i say well imagine working overtime very late into the night you too couldnt be bothered to check, plus this was how he got his powers in the comics aswell so..
Every villains arc was started and ended perfectly, and it honestly didnt feel rushed. (If you'd like to argue otherwise, by all means go ahead im interested in what u think)
2. "Ew wtf why is peter acting all annoying, they didnt explain that at all! They failed to show us how the symbiote corrupted his mind, and made us feel like he became a jerk cause he likes his new suit and thinks its cool"
They didnt fail to do that tho, it was all very obvious, peter is a nice dude and always was nice until he started wearing the symbiote suit, where he started acting more like a villain than a hero, and only when he took it off after realizing what its doing to him, he became normal again and when the symbiotes fell on eddie man became full on evil, if that doesnt explain it enough for you than idk what will.
3. "Organic webbing is just a stupid idea"
Lets put aside that there was a version of spiderman in the comics with organic webbing, i think its a really cool idea to show us how the spider really affected peter, artifical webbing is cool and all but it just makes u think anyone can be spiderman if they stole those web devices. Like take captain america for example hes agile and pretty strong, give him web shooters (and if youre one of the people that believe peter puts a sticky substance on his suit so he can stick to walls after wearing it) and a spiderman suit and thats it he's spiderman.
I think sam raimeis spiderman trilogy really shows us the negatives of being spiderman aswell as the positives. Neither of the other reboots showed us the actual hardships, other than 'oh i cant go to prom cause im spiderman :((('.
Anyways im open for debating if youd like
Peter B Parker : What makes you different is what makes you Spiderman
MCU : We don't do that here.
But the whole time, he was explaining why MCU spider is different
@@raichu753siordia2 exactly xD
Well after no way home he's definitely comic accurate now. Glad they fixed it.
Sony fixed him. Not MCU
Homecoming was worse then spider-man 3
The amazing Spiderman is my favorite Spider-Man
Jayce Cornell I agree with that comment 100 percent
Yee i love amazing spiderman.
Same here brother! To me Andrew was the perfect representation of the character. exactly how I wanted him to be in live action
Last part destroyed Tom Holland in seconds
Toms Spider-Man doesn’t feel like Spider-Man at all….
I just want to put this right here, a lot of people say Tobey was a good Peter Parker, well, as someone who's read the comics, and watched the cartoons (90's animated series and The Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon) | have to say that Maguire was not a good Peter Parker at all. In fact, he was terrible. In the comics, Peter wasn't some spineless pushover who was afraid to talk to women. In the comics, Peter is charasmatic, has a spine, will confidently talk to women. When he met Mary Jane for the first time he was confidently flirting with her, and he has a sense of humor in and out of costume. There was a reason why he attracted Liz Allen, Betty Brant, Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane. Maguire's Peter was too afraid to talk to the girl that was living next door to him for years. In Amazing Fantasy #15 (Spider-Man's very first apperance) The comic shows him asking a girl out. Yes he gets rejected, but at least he had the confidence to go up and ask her. And this was before he got his powers and gained more confidence in himself. Pre-Spider powers comic Peter had more confidence than post power Maguire Spider.
Finally someone who actually reads the comics and know what they’re talking about
and yet people say that Tobey is super accurate 💀
BuT hE's In HiGh ScHoOl In ThE mOvIeS aNd CaN dO a BaCkFlIp In ReAl LiFe
what’s funny is Andrew could do backflips as well I’m pretty sure
@@impulse5674 Tobey could do backflips too, just because Andrew is more lean doesn’t mean a pudgy Tobey couldn’t
@@Bruhface0019 when did he ever say Tobey couldn’t? Y’all ride him so much lmao.
@@jayngb no one's riding tobey , its just that where all confused on what the fuk this guy's point was for saying tom can do backflips too. Like Ok and the other guys do the same!!
Comic book Peter Parker: isn't in high school for the vast majority of his history, not even in most of the original Stan Lee run.
Jeez i don't understand people this days.
When mcu recreates uncle ben and Everything all over again its just exhausting.. honestly we don't need the most "accurate spiderman".. i mean "organic web" is accurate?? And going to be "comic accurate" will be just predictable as gwen dying in tasm2.
Agreed i mean everything doesn't need to be comic accurate i mean look what they did with thor! Everyone loved it when they changed it.
Changing isn't always bad and ORIGINAL ISN'T always THE BEST!
I agree with your statement that it doesn't need to be comic accurate but I still can't help but feel like MCU's spiderman feels. off it doesn't feel. like. spiderman at all spiderman ps4 did way better potrayal of peter and spiderman
I think it's because I always view spiderman as a independent and struggling hero who's doing what he's doing because of regret and a promise to his late uncle ben
and seeing it being changed like how he's now a kid who looks up to Ironman and wants to be Spiderman to be just like him..
Change is good and all but that took away spiderman's charm
because right now mcu spiderman feels like any normal teenager when they have a spiderman's power it lacks the peter parker's with great power comes great responsibility thinking that keeps him going as spiderman.
@@mikureyes7179 i kinda feel that too in the first movie. But it kinda fades in for me in ffh..maybe they can fix this in the 3rd film?
@@dij-rin4499 Yeah I was kinda hoping that realization peter will feel that with great power comes great responsibility I mean tom. holland really nailed the teen spiderman but the script tho..smh Take away the following on ironman's footsteps and focus more on his responsibility and bam the perfect potryal of spiderman
they got the right actor,im fine with the non comic book accurate characters+ if they just got the whole purpose of why peter is spiderman that way this will feel more like spiderman and not iron man jr I just wish they went this route
@@mikureyes7179 i really hope mcu makes spider verse then tom sees Andrew and tobey being independent realising he needs to step up and be like them
I’m so over the TASM hate in general. Just admit the first movie bangs and Andrew Garfield is TRANSCENDENT and move on.
He might not be accurate, but he’s still my favorite cause he just feels like spider man, he’s a teenager that does random and small acts of kindness and then he goes fighting with villains. And again who would like another uncle Ben DYING FOR THE THIRD TIME, so iron man is kind of better cause it makes spider man more important in the MCU.
Basically what I’m saying is that, you don’t always gotta make movies very accurate to the comics, it’s just gets more boring and boring, try something new!
@James Sturm I kinda agree with you but I think far from home was also pretty good and kinda felt like spider-man
Andrew Garfield was the best most accurate Peter Parker and best Spider-Man. The movies just did him no justice. Blame the Directors not the Actor.
Blame the studio not directors and writers..
@@jesseomollo9405 exactly.
Not the director’s fault lmao
Imagine saying something is comic accurate when you don’t even read the comics.
This video did not age well.
I think its kinda racist that they couldn't make miles morales the MCU spiderman despite literally giving the MCU peter all miles character
People need to stop saying Tom holland is the best Spider-Man as you stated he’s not a Spider-Man from the comics he’s just a awkward dude with powers his movies are good and to me he’s just a Spider-Man that tripped and fall into the portal which is mcu his movies are more on the side of what was Spider-Man doing when the avengers were kicking and taking names how are you going to have a Spider-Man movie without the Osborn’s Peter Parker best friend was always Harry and Mary Jane was always at the same school as Peter or lived in the same neighborhood flash Thompson was on the basketball team and now he’s a nerd that’s on the debate team
or just say what you want, people dont need to stop saying nothing just because you dont like it.
No one is saying he's the best spiderman, look at the every comments here
Is it the comics or mcu? Like bro what are u even talking about? Tom holland is a live action Spider-Man not a comic Spider-Man.
Personally, I always hated how Tom's Spider-Man fought. Quite the reason I can't get into it. It gets better with Garfield then Far from home fights was so much better. Am I the only one who felt that?
But in drama, it gets worst. I do agree that MCU is Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker.
I'd like to hear your thoughts a year later since NWH got released.
Everyone talking about how Gwen is Peter's first girlfriend while gigachads who read from the very start of the original Spider-man comics know that Betty Brant is his first GF.
fr gwen was his first true love, not gf.
they were literally gonna get married right after the night gwen died (if she survived) sorry it's been over a year that I'm replying to this
@@spooderblue you have a valid point.
Man wouldn't it just be better if they added Andrew Garfields spiderman in the mcu instead of this iron boy junior version
Iron Man's Robin! 😂😂😂😂 Nailed it!
For me, i feel in like MCU Spider-Man is the popular Iron-Bor Jr., looks like he never struggles, he never learn his mistakes, he's being too dependent on the others, he never learn something on his own and he doesn't have the great power comes great responsibility motivation for himself.
I hope in No Way Home they shows some kind of a redemption arc for him and i just hate to say this but I really want to see him doing on his own and doing what's right necessary whenever it's personal or desperate in any situation. I just want see Peter Parker being relatable to his struggles in life and had a bad luck. That's how Stan Lee made the character for us to relate him.
This aged well 😂
man said " zendaya can do no wrong in my eyes" XD
Just because tobey doesn’t crack that many quips doesn’t mean he is not spider man. Do u really expect him to joke with such high stakes. All 3 actors got the basic traits of Peter Parker right, that being socially arwkward and nerdy but what really makes peter Parker is being an outsider and I can’t really say that about Tom when EVERYONE in his class is smart and nerdy, whereas with Toby he felt like a nerd and an outsider, which was literally established in the FIRST SCENE. And what really makeS Spider-Man is his duality and doing the right thing even though it means Peter Parker loses so spiderman and New York wins which happens in every rami movie. Tom Holland Spider-Man doesn’t feel like there is a duality and some of his reasons for being spider man aren’t about responsibility but becoming an avenger or living up to iron man which aren’t Spider-Mans morals. That’s why if u ask most people they will say Tobey is the best and most accurate Spider-Man, because when spiderman wins Peter loses and his problems are way more relatable. I like Tom as the mcu Spider-Man but I wouldn’t call him comic book accurate. He is a good spiderman for the mcu because all of the mcu movies are for UNIVERSE BUILDING but not an accurate Spider-Man coz Spider-Man doesn’t need other marvel characters to drive the story.
By the way ask your self this, spiderman is supposed to be the greatest hero in marvel, but if you only consider the mcu, would you really say that. Spider-Man is suppose to feel like someone who every one depends on, but he gets overshadowed and sometimes acts like a twelve year old. Spider-Man PS4 I a PERFECT example of how Spider-Man should be, and obviously spectacular spider man. Just compare them to MCU Spider-Man?
@@AM-bq4ki Ok so you are one of the people who don't get it, ok. You want Spider-Man to come into an already established universe and basically steal the build up of Iron Man's arc, because at the time, Iron Man was filling that spot for the whole significance of his character and RDJ's charisma. He was the center of that universe. You want Spider-Man to be that without him earning it, so basically you wanted Captain Marvel. It's the first time that any franchise takes every aspect of the character into account instead of giving you everything at once. He's supposed to earn everything that makes him great. and right now he's earned his place as the Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man, he's earned his place as the one man Avengers army he's always been. He is supposed to feel overshadowed, cause he is. He's always been overshadowed, he's supposed to earn his place. You know why Spider-Man PS4 works so well despite living in a similar universe to Tom's? Because he had 8 years to earn his place as a superhero. You know why Spectacular Spider-Man works? Because he's the only superhero in that universe. The whole universe is obviously gonna fall into his shoulders. Tom is surrounded by superheroes that were there before him, just like Peter Parker in the Ultimate comics (and yes I can defend that). People in those comics say the same thing about Spider-Man that you're saying right now about Tom Holland Spider-Man. All of the things you mention make Spider-Man great do happen, but people omit these things in order to serve their narrative. I won't say that people are blinded by nostalgia to judge the Raimi movies as great, because they are. But they are blinded when it comes to analyzing these movies, because the things that they want are there they just don't want to see it, A LOT of other people do, I don't get why you don't. I really want people to see what I see
@@AM-bq4ki toby and Andrew the best
@@ADSNavarro Tobey a spider man saving the world some the best movie in marvel history Andrew a great peter parker he fits so well the amazing spider man forever they both fight for the people they both work solo toby just as to fix irons mans problem since when was vulture a iron man villain ??if you read the comics vulture dont even know who iron man is and they story of mistoryo I dont know who to spell his name is shit mistoryo never worked for iron man he was more of a spider person what's next Sony and marvel you gonna ruined dr Octopus next or green goblin
@@whoknows6955 i know man just ignore the ad snavarro he is an mcu fan boy who knows nothing about the comics
Tobey McGuire set the bar so high for spider man I don’t think it can be touched.
If Far From Home is your favourite movie you really don't understand what makes Spider-Man such a spectacular superhero
It’s the other way around, the avengers have asked spidey to join their team multiple times and he’s turned them down bc he likes working alone and just isn’t that big of a fan of them, (other then when Bendis had him join which wasn’t the best move but still) he doesn’t wanna be on a team, he wants to keep to himself, he’s the Everyman hero
Oh yeah he did turn them down 🤔
He did but Tony made him an avenger
To be honest, I want peter parker in the MCU, not miles morales with the name and looks of peter.
He doesn't even need to be in the MCU anyway. The MCU is just overrated they ruined spiderman I just want to see spiderman out of the MCU and doing his own movies.
@ZAP GAMERZ what
there will never be an even close to 100% accurate spider man, they will always have more faults than not, (in my opinion)
Oh yeah you are those one of those strict "I dont like change" type of people. I'm sure your opinion hasn't changed after a year. but it's like you hang your opinion over every other person's opinion.
Was I the only one who liked Andrew and Tobey's Spider-Man?
No. Toby is the best and I’m not the only one
Me too,like Toby and Andrew. Tom is cringe
@@pentagon141 agree 100%
I like all 3 of them
nope Andrews the goat
Sony : we want our hero back
MCU: take this money and shut up your mouth
Fans : we want our Tobey Maguire back 🙄😒😥
It’s obvious your one of the people who grew up with old Spider-Man and your crying because they did something new. It’s way better then the old plain and boring performances and out-dated animation. Spider-Man makes jokes all the times in the comics, he’s serious when he needs to be. Tom Holland is the best Spider-Man.
TheBeaverInHD so I take it you’re biased about Tom/miles Morales ok well uh miles morales 3 is coming out soon
@Standard Yip I mean not really. I still like Toby Spider-Man, I grew up with it too. I just like an energetic performance over a boring one.
@Standard Yip So I take it your biased about Toby/Andrew/ultimate boring performance ok well ultimate boring performance sequels is coming ou-Oh wait...
TheBeaverInHD dang what you so pressed about I’m actually happy to enjoy 3 amazing movies of Tobey but like go off I guess
This aged very bad😂
MCU spiderman haters are all blinded by nostalgia
@@stephtastic4515 or you could enjoy something and critique it at the same time. He said he liked the mcu movies in the beginning of the video.
I’m sick of people complaining about Tom Holland Spider-Man not being comic accurate what you don’t realise is they tried a different approach on the character
I mean I guess so but he has no uncle ben which is the main reason as to why peter is spiderman
@@user9013 Yes he does. Watch no way home.
@@sceplecture2382 and guess what it only proves we have been watching a dumbed down Spider-Man all this tim e
@@ATalesTruth- I've always felt that the new spider man was bad. That he was a kid, didn't really act like a hero etc. . now I think that's exactly what they were going for. We got to watch a kid develop over the span of like 4 movies. Rather than rushing it with a single movie. Like I said I didn't like Tom hallnd, but after no way home that changed. I realized in each movie it was a recurring theme of "your just a kid". This movie gave him his uncle Ben moment and finally gave him responsibility. He even lets go of his friends because he now understand the weight of that responsibility. Anyways that's my rant for nwh.
@@sceplecture2382 the problem is if they said the origin already happen before civil war as we all know it to be
They wouldn’t need to dumb down his character to build him back up again
In other words we could have gotten the new trilogy as the first trilogy from the get go
Plus it’s stupid for them to dumb down his character to begin with, essentially we got a 3 film origin story when people didn’t want to see the origin
We could ahve gotten a offscreen origin not even 3 minutes worth telling us he gets the responsibility lesson in civil war
Essentially 3 minutes offscreen origin vs a 3 film origin
If they had any brains and creativity they would have made stories where peter actually acted like Spider-Man and not this dumbed down version
Toby McGuire spiderman had the best character development
I always thought Tom Holland is like Miles Morales from the comics and not the Spider-verse.
2:10 I thought I was going crazy for a second