@@tuckerfyffe4999 going from "thirteen" we can break this down into "thir(d) teen" as in first second third. So then in conclusion it would actually be Firteen and Secteen. QED
I love how Charlie puts no effort into his intro and outro. And how he doesn’t use a dumbass clickbait, unless he’s joking around. He’s just straight to the point and I love it.
I appreciate Charlie being so responsible about this, going as far as researching how valid the source is and presenting the inconsistencies he noticed in it. Not enough people do that.
@@gabrielschneider7087 yea in the discord chat she says shes from Maryland and shes 17 almost 18. Also the age of consent can be confirmed by simply doing a google search
@@boppinggamer8571 Yeah but having the cobsent age doesn't mean you're automatically consent. In this discord chat the woman seems to not wanting pictures like this
This dude really said "Charlie is my homie, he'll have my back." after witnessing him destroy predators such as Max and EDP. Edit: MaximilianMus is who I'm referring to.
You mean.... 2021? If i hear someone else correcting me that it is the fucking decade! Not the year! I swear to god im gonna make both world wars look like a kids birthday party (Nice likes)
@@henkdachief That’s one way to think about it, but also could just be a “just incase” video so he doesn’t get harassed by Twitter kids who thinks it’s true if this blew up
Its funny how, if you pause Charlie mid sentence, and go pee, and come back and resume, you have no idea what he was talking about, you have to go back like 60sec to know what the context was
The last time I used Twitch whispers was someone asking me for sex advice. I helped him a little bit but I was uncomfortable with it overall, so I said so and stopped replying. He got very upset and started just straight up attacking me until I blocked him. And that’s the last time I’ll ever use twitch whispers.
@@Arn._. last, and only time when i used it was when a small streamer from my country sent me a message to answer a question i asked that he didn't see during the stream lmao
The fact that the guy mentioned Charlie kinda plays in the direction that he made this thing up for some weird publicity stunt. Like why else would a guy want more attention if he is accused for something like that? I kinda hope that this is just a publicity stunt because it would be the least harmful scenario.
there isn't one charlie in the world. It might be some other random fucking guy named charlie. If he did actually attempt to calll for Critikal then yes it's as you said.
I remember there was this guy that was like the Chris Hansen of Discord. He would go around and pretend to be a 14-13y/o girl to catch nasty ass predators, but Discord kept fucking banning him. Like, dude. C'mon, Discord, you're focusing on the wrong guy here.
Because it actually makes predators harder to catch lol, his evidence means little to nothing, the predator will never get arrested for a discord chat that can easily be fake or manipulated, it just makes predators more self aware and weary of potential baits. The court doesn't even acknowledge the majority of "To catch a predator" cases because they're "less than professionals" and that show actually makes the predators come in person.
@@garou9914 So true they even make it worse for the police if they were following or tracking the person they were baiting in to as a lot of the time because it was not a child but a adult pretending to be one is some cases they lose as not broken no law because it was not a child messaging them but some man that gets off on it pretending to be a child to catch people makes it easy for them to win court case and makes it harder in the future to charge them as they can use this as a defence. So all the predator catchers are making it worse only thing they do is put the persons life in danger when they spread the info online so people what to get them so police have to spend time resources and tax payers money relocating them that why people hate them so much on what they are doing.
@@giggity4670 yeah totally, besides they do it for attention mainly let's be honest, either by getting views or just getting treated as heroes. Like 2-3 years ago I used to do the same thing on discord, and a lot of pedos were falling for it, I thought I was doing something good, but to be honest I mainly just wanted the attention and getting treated like some kind of vigilante, but shortly after I realized that I was just making things worse without any real benefits, so I stopped.
@@jacobmontemayor6685 "It looks like there's hard evidence, not just twitter bullshit". Believing in innocent until proven guilty isnt defending someone, it's common sense. He's not getting in on mindless cancel culture, and I respect that.
@@LordZanas If the dude's intentions was trolling and getting clicks, no matter whether he's guilty or not, Charlie definitely helped him. Even me who hangs on LSF never even heard of the situation before watching this video.
Consider that all media always brands anyone accused of pedofila or rape instantly without evidence it would be pretty hard to get their side of the story, charlie on the other hand waits for evidence
@@CatRockk don't go disliking the videos though, just report the comment. It might not be there videos could just as easily be someone trying to get a bunch of dislikes on someone's video.
I’m pretty sure he’s a troll, he probably mentioned Charlie hoping he’d make a video about the drama to attract more attention. He’s still live on twitch right now so he’s farming viewers.
@@ronpaulssecretary well, technically, if you're not honry and are pretending to be horny, youre playing the role of being the horny one where there was never a horny one. Horny.
Standing in court: "Your honor, hopefully Charlie can do a video about me and help prove my innocence." Judge: "What's his relation to you?" Me: "He's a homie."
So weird. This dudes mindset was, "maybe i'll get someone to "expose" me as a preditor/pedo. Then i'll put out evidence that im innocent and bam everyone will follow and love me."
@Beast the Grim executioner thats not stupid bro, thats pure fucking evil. child predators are disgusting things. not even people. hes not stupid. he knows what he did. he did it anyway knowing what could happen.
I mean it's 90% chance it's fake, it's literally like when story writers want it to end so they just do it with no logic. Y would he immediately want to dm her and ask for sex while streaming and who has a video of them jerking it saved and how did he send it while streaming and constantly message her and no one noticed anything
@WindTheBrave There are a lot of problems with what you're saying. First, yeah, the main part of society does like to jump the gun on accusations (although 90+% of the time the accusations are real), but there's an anti-society that overcorrects those missteps. There's a large audience that will support anyone accused of wrongdoing because they want to believe the accusations are false. Sometimes it ends with the accused being proven innocent, sometimes nothing is proven, but either way this audience will back the accused with blind faith, assuming it's faked. You're also assuming the accused is acting with logic. This is a sex scandal, sex brain can destroy every logical thought that may come to you. You say the responses sound robotic, but if you're imagining an attractive woman on the other side with the same emotions as you, it doesn't matter what's being said to you if it's not directly negative (and even sometimes when it is). You presume the poster has left out information, that they are acting in bad faith, but have no reason to believe this. The accused is just as capable of acting in bad faith, even if we assume that he's not genuinely trying to receive sexual attention. "Real evidence" doesn't mean undeniably true. It means that it would be damning if it were true; evidence that, if proven to be genuine, would indisputably prove the allegations to be true.
Discord screenshots are EXTREMELY easy to fake, and I would assume twitch whispers are easy as hell too. All you have to do is use the inspect tool, just highlight the text and then just right click and then left click on the option. BOOM, you can fake almost anyone saying anything (as long as you have dms with them) Edit: Nevermind, you don't even need DMs with them.
I used to fake discord screenshots for fun, once you have the font and the color codes, you can do that shit in MS paint easy. Hell, you don't even need the font, just letters and words. (which i did use along with MS paint)
AIM was easily faked back in the day, just had to copy username use the return key and start a new line. You could make anyone say anything and it was so simple but flew over alot of people's heads.
right, but if there is a video? thats sort of hard to fake. Idk what the video had, but if it was obviously him, then even if the person was baiting him, there was still intent. I'm not sure tho, things can be faked. thankfully there really isnt a victim here.
Is no one going to talk about how in the Reddit post, he says “I guess my name sounds like a girls name” implying that the streamer texted him out of nowhere and there was no anticipating this, but he just randomly pretends to be a girl anyway and goes full Chris Hansen on him at the end of the chat? I mean, I feel like if a popular streamer asked me in my DMs if I was a girl the last thing I’d do is just go along with it. Seems a bit fishy.
I agree, but I've totally had a male streamer up in my dms EVERYDAY saying he misses me etc wants to get to know me better, saying I could move to Arizona where he lives etc AND I NEVER LED HIM ON AT ALL. the guy legit sits in storm wind allll day long targeting players who have female names. He did this to me at level fucking 30 before I was even max level just cuz I was inspecting his gear. I had to block him in order to be left alone. BUT that's not to say that's what's happening her. I'm also 24 so nothing bad actually went down
Honestly if it’s made for publicity, it’ll make sense that he mentioned u even tho u have no relation to him. It’s a very easy way to get his name out there.
Makes sense it’ll get his name out and people would watch him to keep updated or criticize him and know his side or whatever. But then his following would drop within a week and have less then he started with. Idk people are odd
I mean if this was some orchestrated attempt to gain attention it's working well. Mentioning you literally got you to make a vid on it and without this I would have known nothing about them....but now I'm curious.
agreed, people are more likely to avoid that channel, or if they do visit- spam fbi memes, spam hate posts, or rip on him for pulling scamshiz tactics.
Why is it that it seems like every week there is a new predator coming to light? I wish there could be more positive news out there, because these situations really make me lose faith in humanity.
i don't know how this story ended, or if it has, but discord is the worst thing to use for evidence. as if it wasn't easy enough to fake screenshots, you could just go into the browser version and use inspect element to edit things further, and it's so easy to fake an account to look like someone else's since usernames don't have to be unique. i'd always be suspicious of discord proof just to be safe.
I've seen this before in practically every community. something that baffles me is when people try to fake screenshots, instead of just inspecting element and changing text and media, they edit it together from bits and screenshots in a photo editor. usually very poorly with no understanding of UI, and yet they still think it's gonna work. if you're gonna fake a discord convo, which are already so easy to fake, at least try a little. it's just embarrassing. I'm realizing now this is very off topic but i needed to get my feelings out about this... LIE BETTER, PEOPLE... or don't...
@@ChadButt discord always has some of the dumbest and worst scammers and cons. It honestly feels like some of these people have below room temperature IQ with the stuff they try to pull. Marmite on toast would have a better scam pitch than some of them I've seen. A child telling their parents they didn't eat all the cake in the fridge while covered in chocolate is more convincing than them. It's bizarre to me that people fall for it.
Charlie:"today we are gonna be talking about a serious topic" Also Charlie not even a minute later:"at the vending machine soda poppin was grabbin on my nutsack and it was getting weird when he was pullin the hairs" 😂
Discord msg screenshots are useless, you can literally use discord's built in Inspect Element tool to edit a message to say anything you want and use any pfp or username you want.
That is why discord support doesn't accept screenshots of any kind. They only accept the message link. And if the person has deleted the messages then you can't report them xd
Any and all screenshots are like that. You can open up the developer console in any given web browser and just change what's on the screen and take a screenshot
this is a thing that's very easy to do, once in my school some guy made a snapchat account, named it some kid he didn't like then sent some very bad words and screenshotted it then sent it to the school and he got expelled. This is is a very different case but it's an example of how texts are so easy to fake
@@thekingkaiju9385 Still. By him stating Charlie will defend me it is assuming that both him and the person reading can understand who Charlie is. So it goes to reason that it would be a household name
@@spaghettboy2173 The two that were talking clearly have some form of familiarity. They possibly know some of the same people. They could possibly both know someone named Charlie.
@@spaghettboy2173 Now, maybe he is referring to Critical, but, seeing as that hasn't been 100% confirmed, it is still likely that dumbass was just talking about another Charlie.
5:55 I cannot stand how much of a buzzword “groom” has become where it’s used so liberally by people that obviously don’t have a fucking clue what it means. Grooming is a very long, pretty much years long process normalizing decrepit behavior, ultimately tricking the victim into accepting it and loving them no matter how horrible the things they do to them. This right here isn’t that at all. This is sending sexually explicit material to a minor that entirely took place in the span of less than an hour. Both examples are bad. Both are pedophilic in nature. But they aren’t the same thing and I hate it when these buzzwords just become another all encompassing word for anyone you don’t like. (This isn’t about Charlie btw; I’m aware he didn’t call this grooming in his own words so he’s fine)
I had a relative that was groomed. It's terrifying seeing the effects it can have on someone, that they really don't understand and defend the behaviour of someone preying on a weakness. It's sickening. There's another term for something like what happened here, isn't there?
@@jameslowe4031 Depends how you compare it. You could say victims in both cases are forming positive bonds with bad people. A captive person forming an emotional bond with their captor is irrational, but a child doesn't have the ability to rationalize the situation because they're too immature to know what's right or wrong. So I wouldn't compare them like they're the same thing, but they are fairly similar on the surface. I also wouldn't listen to strangers on the internet. Draw one of those crossy-circle things in and do some credible research. Post it on Reddit for that sweet gold and karma lol
@@jameslowe4031 I would say more so, as someone who had experienced such, actual grooming may lead to the development of Stockholm Syndrome, but the two directly invite no comparison between. 'One thing leads to another'
It's talent, mixed with hard work and genuineness, though never thought of it as a talent "for the use of English". However, that's exactly what it is.
I get the vibe that he orchestrated this whole thing, called for you to make a video exonerating him knowing shit wasn't true, so you'd get to the bottom of it, and he'd get all of the publicity. Tl;dr he made all this up, wants you to clear him, and he gets publicity and be viewed sympathetically as a victim.
For every inch of hair length determines Charlie's personal net worth. Each inch equals $1 million of net worth. The hair tells me Charlie is around $14,000,000... Me, I'm bald, so yes it's a very accurate measurement.
@WindTheBrave ...can ya put this into shorter words? I'm genuinely curious to your point here, but i have pretty bad adhd, so its hard for me to keep track and read long paragraphs without getting lost and confused.
Conversation between Abe and the 50% who went to war over it. "Why should WEEEEEEEEE get rid of OUUUURRRRR slaves, we are responsible slave owners! Just because HEEEEEE mistreats HISSSSS slaves, doesnt mean WEEEE do. I only use MYYY slaves to protect my family. I keep my slaves, locked in a safe." Jim Jeffries
@@FauxGemini My teen-self assumed I was listening to the disembodied voice of a fully grown man and only years later find out we’re the same age. Wouldn’t be surprised to learn he just spawned into existence as is.
@@ouija__bored he's kind of timeless sounding I agree, he has simultaneously amazing insights and the stupidity/naivety of somebody fresh out of their twenties, and I appreciate him for it
I programmed Siri to called me “Grandmaster Titties” in 2011 because Charlie referred to a pirate pig in a Dora video game as that and I just haven’t changed it. Sometimes I forget and when I send emails from my iPhone it signs it with that monicker. It’s an L I’m willing to take
because he is a twitch streamer and youtuber with a big audience who goes by Charlie. All of which is implied in the statement he made. There is most likely a handful or less of possible people.
@@cheminem That's just wrong. We don't know the alleged's life, and so family or friends or people by association any of them can be named Charlie. Just because Mr. Cr1tikal is the most well-known does not mean by default every Charlie means him.
@@mexamrc But if you remember in the video title he said that “Charlie would make a video and defend him” so I don’t think it’s any of his family or friends
Plot twist: The guy who put Charlie's name in the title of his video claiming he would help created this for the purpose of drawing attention to his channel used Charlie as a boost by manufacturing this series of events himself
I don't think that they person was referring to this charlie, it could be a friend so it's weird to assume they meant Critikal. For the allegation, i have some doubts, mainly because of how the person responded (telling the person that they were specifically making a reddit thread instead of going to the police), how 0-100 the streamer got with first getting info to immediately sending pics, and how the streamer talked.
I disagree and believe he intentionally drug Charlie into this. Everything I've seen in this video has a consistent logic like it was planned in advance. The ridiculous "evidence" that seems like a parody of itself sets up the "he was framed" narrative in a believable way; preying on people who relate to false accusations. Especially when he asks Charlie for help. He's forcing Charlie to make a response video addressing the situation using Twitter mobs harassing Charlie for answers, meanwhile the Twitter mob does all the work for him and further supporting his narrative he was framed. That all being said, I'm exclusively going off this video and haven't watched the guys streams. You don't know someone until you see them live, and my opinion may change, but "edgy cringelord hatches brilliant plan to garner sympathy" seems most likely.
There was nothing illegal about that interaction. Even if the victim was 17-18yo girl it wouldn't be illegal as the predator didn't solicit pics. He was just a creepy racist asshole. I think getting him deplatformed is really the only action that would lead to anything happening, at best you get a police report, but I highly doubt you'd even get that.
This probably isn't real as I wouldn't trust anything you find on twitter or reddit or wherever this was located, but people sending nudes to people with no idea who they are is definitely a thing.
It does seem fishy, but the sending a video after like 4 messages is not odd to me. I've had dudes add me on snapchat or whatever and the VERY FIRST message they send is a D pic or video. So that part is believable... but uh... it does seem fake in other ways. Congrats to him if it is fake, I guess, since anyone who may have cared about him now thinks he's the worst kind of person, so... yay...
Trying to have a serious conversation with my fiancé and we put on a random video for privacy. Not long after hitting play on the video, the conversation came to an immediate halt and we both erupted with laughter when we heard the words “queef queen” leave charlies mouth.
@@themyofmy im autistic and i don't give a shit roast that anti degenerate Anti Degenerate Edit: the second anti degenerate is me saying the name of the anti degenerate
The thing that’s so worrying is that twitch people have such a reputation of abusing status to groom young girls that it would be incredibly easy to frame someone with minimal effort. I went through the same thing when I was young, a stupid little girl on discord who thought that the men were trustworthy because they were older. It’s horrible, so I can’t imagine how horrible it is to be accused of doing something so rancid. Regardless, I really don’t know what’s gonna go down.
And then there’s the inverse, where people become so wary of false accusations that they accuse everyone who doesn’t have hard evidence of lying. It’s awful all around
It won't do much, people are so quick on the draw that as soon as they hear the word Allegation they get straight to cancelling whoever is accused rather than wait until there is undisputable evidence that they are either guilty/not guilty. Happened with Pyrocynical not too long ago.
@@acidous1276 yeah it might not do much but it’s still just a good thing to do. Especially for the future. If this guy turns out innocent, and in some 5-10 years if this video randomly starts getting a lot of views again, it’ll be a lot harder for people to dig up the full story and then harass the guy about it. And if it turns out he’s guilty, well, he’ll probably be in jail anyways LMAO
Appreciate how fair you are about these things. Like you obviously care if this dude is actually a predator, but having the healthy skepticism is needed in these situations because, very unfortunately, people love to fake these kind of things. And if the streamer is the one orchestrating it that's dumb and fucked up.
Using twitter as an example, I definitely felt like people on there ran with things without taking a step back to consider what actually happened. Like they don't even seem to care about victims, they just like to dogpile on people. I wish more people could be considerate to those who make these allegations while also not jumping in straight away.
This doesn’t seem legit to me. He “finds” girls by randomly dming girlish sounding names and also used the n word too? I mean, it kinda seems suspect that the accuser would claim he’s going to post it to reddit and then the streamer would start using the n-word. Really too stupid a move to make, I think. Everything looks a little suspect about this.
If most of the people he’s done it to before are actually teens, they typically don’t report. They feel special when older guys hit on them. I’ve never met a teenager who doesn’t think they’re more grown than they are, and they realize when they’re older what happened was wrong
Charlie is the most mature person on RUclips. The first video of his I saw was him playing a shitty Smurfs game where he had problems jumping over a fence the second screen in. I love our timeline sometimes
The way the "screenshots" make him immediately be creepy asf then go to immediate racial slurs make me think they're fake lol, like it just seems like making the dude say anything cancellable, I have no clue who he is so not defending him in any way lol
I respect Charlie's belief of innocent until proven guilty so much. I don't know the guy, or anything else about the situation. So it's not ok to judge until it's proven. If it is then fuck that guy If it's false, then I hope this doesn't affect him to much.
fr fr, I'm also glad there's influencers who're supporting that type of mindset. The internet loves to get mad and bandwagon, so it's nice to see someone who's teaching people to think critically and come to their own conclusions
@@spanigh9735 Well it's like charlie said though. The evidence provided does seem damning, until you look a bit closer and see how weird it is. Like for example, how aggressive our supposed predator is, and how there is no other reported cases. It's a weird situation.
Every part of this screams "I want attention, and I don't care how I get it." Him mentioning you without even knowing you is a very obvious nudge to try and get you to speak about it in order to accelerate the rate at which people talk about this. Plus, nobody is stupid enough to be like "Oh no! I committed a crime! Time to ask every person around me how to wipe my hard drive as suspiciously as possible!" Everything he did was an intentional act to try and make it blow up-- the complete opposite thing a real predator would do.
I think leaving the streamer's name off this was a good idea. I just want to say, for anyone concerned that this is bait/a hoax/a false accusation: right now, you're right, we can't prove it's true. I personally am not looking for this person to have their career ruined or be deplatformed (at least not without harder evidence). However, people's personal safety > Twitch streamers' careers in terms of relative importance (especially minors' personal safety). Speaking openly about allegations like this and investigating them while giving the survivor/victim the benefit of the doubt, is the safest way to do this. I don't think just trying to find the truth, or even one person warning another "hey just be careful getting too close/parasocial with this person, because there do exist these allegations," is equivalent to finding someone criminally guilty without due process (which is the kind of logic that people always end up bringing out when allegations like this come up). If the allegations turn out to be false, yes, this person's career on Twitch may take a hit, which isn't fair since they didn't do anything. However, people can repair their careers (and also you can just get a different, non-internet job), and tbh from what I've seen in the past in similar cases, even actual predators are able to still have careers in the public eye. So I think this person will probably survive. If the allegations turn out to be true, but we do nothing, it could actually endanger some people. Again, I think their personal safety is a bigger gamble to take than someone's career, although obviously I'd rather not gamble with either. I think it can be easy to see some headlines where someone's allegations were proven false (or even just proven to have some holes in them without being fully debunked), or to watch/read stories about people lying about these kinds of crimes, and to get the idea that false allegations are really common and normal. It's called confimation bias; we remember a given situation more easily, because it was memorable/sensational, and so we get the impression that it happens more often, even if it doesn't. This doesn't mean someone is less intelligent or gullible for having confirmation bias; it's a thing our brain often automatically does as a survival method. Statistically, allegations of sexual misconduct tend not to be false. It's much more likely for allegations like these to be corroborated and for other evidence to be found, than it is for someone to be shown to be lying about what happened to them (and most often, even when these allegations are proven false, it later turns out that the accuser was actually still the victim of this type of crime, they just lied about who committed it to protect the real culprit for various reasons; usually the real culprit was a family member or authority figure). *Statistically, you are at a much greater risk of experiencing sexual assault/abuse yourself, than you are of being falsely accused of sexual assault/abuse.* These statistics don't necessarily mean that things like false allegations can never happen to anyone, but they mean that if you needed to pick one scenario to go with on limited information, in terms of what actions you might take for your own or someone else's safety, there's one scenario that is much more likely to be true than the other, and so is a "safer" bet. That said, that scenario only applies to things like "should I be alone/let my younger siblings be alone with this person," not "should this person have a platform." I guess I'm just trying to head off a lot of the discourse we normally see on the internet every time some allegations get made, even before people necessarily know who the allegations are against, because unfortunately, a lot of the time, we get taught to mistrust people making these types of accusations. This narrative we get taught may or may not have something to do with the incredibly large amount of sexual predators that seem to be infesting our cultural, political, and social institutions, and manage to rise to positions of power in them. (and it's another essay-comment; sorry everyone)
@@Ohmyadeline more than likely. I used to he prescribed it, and basically what would happen is i would blink and suddenly be 45 min deep in a comment section argument. Not really, i would have one of these essays posted in what seemed like 18 seconds tho. Adderall really fucks a kid up if they dont need it, which almost everyone.
Alleged Predator: “Help me prove my innocence!”
Charlie: “I’ve never met this man in my life.”
Alleged Predator: "He's my brother!"
Charlie: "Adopted"
"I don't even know who you are"
@@IvoryMane bro😂😂😂😂
Plot twist charlies the fake 17 year old girl
@@goosefaba9000 x'D
Ah yes, eleventeen and twelveteen.
The good old teenage years
Oneteen and twoteen
@@tuckerfyffe4999 going from "thirteen" we can break this down into "thir(d) teen" as in first second third. So then in conclusion it would actually be Firteen and Secteen. QED
@@dijkstra4678 You adding QED to the end should not have been as funny to me as it was, thank you
tenteen
@@jonathanathor117 yourmomteen
I swear charlie is just a depressed Chris Hansen at this point
Somebody needs to tell Cr1tikal that we will only watch him if he uploads Fortnite. This is why I have more popularity.
Somebody needs to tell Cr1tikal that we will only watch him if he uploads Fortnite. This is why I have more popularity.
Shut up
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 no. The RUclips drama is better...
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 shut up
I love how Charlie puts no effort into his intro and outro. And how he doesn’t use a dumbass clickbait, unless he’s joking around. He’s just straight to the point and I love it.
Agreed, best RUclipsr ever, also no gaming footage gameplay.
Then why a minute in I hear tugging on my nit hairs
YES LMAO
@AutismoGamer so pissed looool. Oh just saw the name 0/8
It fucking works
"valedictorian of vaginal expulsion" is not a phrase I was prepared to hear today. thank you.
It’s so fucked up😂😂😂
Half the reason to watch Charlies videos are the phrases he comes up with.
🤐
Bruh
@MANOLE ALEXANDRU-MIHAI like 20 seconds into the video ducking watch it
I appreciate Charlie being so responsible about this, going as far as researching how valid the source is and presenting the inconsistencies he noticed in it. Not enough people do that.
Yea but I don't know why he didn't point out that the age of consent in Maryland is 16 while she's 17...
@@boppinggamer8571 is it for real? Damn, i didn't even know
@@gabrielschneider7087 yea in the discord chat she says shes from Maryland and shes 17 almost 18. Also the age of consent can be confirmed by simply doing a google search
@@boppinggamer8571 good to know. Then this situation really isn't what it seems
@@boppinggamer8571 Yeah but having the cobsent age doesn't mean you're automatically consent. In this discord chat the woman seems to not wanting pictures like this
“He’s a homie”
Charlie: I don’t even know who you are
It’s like that Matt Gaetz interview with Tucker Carlson.
He want to be defended meanwhile Charlie isn't type of person who will defend you without evidence or if you are wrong.
@Wally Wally wtf was that
@@liriani it's a spammer, they go around putting RUclips links to random videos in comments
@@antarctican_immagrants6849 please elaborate
To catch a twitch predator
With Moist Critical (Chris Hansen)
I think they're just called "Twitchers", named for the obvious nervous habit irl
Oi not many ppl will get this but take twitch out of that sentence and you gotta a good yet fucked up song
@@themanbehindthecurtain7766 crit handsome
To watch a predator
This dude really said "Charlie is my homie, he'll have my back." after witnessing him destroy predators such as Max and EDP.
Edit: MaximilianMus is who I'm referring to.
Somebody needs to tell Charlie that we will only watch him if he uploads Fortnite. This is why I have more popularity.
Downloaded Fortnite or I’m coming for you.
If Charlie doesn’t start playing Fortnite I’m coming after him. This is why I have more popularity because I play Fortnite.
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 nice bait
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 bro Charlie we’ll never acknowledge you
Another gem to add to the 2020s distaster infinity gauntlet.
Not really. This is absolutely fake. Can’t believe people are going this far for attention.
I don’t know, it seems fake to me, but sure the disaster infinity gauntlet.
Y u lonely? You are sandwich u good
You mean.... 2021?
If i hear someone else correcting me that it is the fucking decade! Not the year! I swear to god im gonna make both world wars look like a kids birthday party
(Nice likes)
@@atoxicperson6794 2020’s as in the decade
If this is publicity stunt, I’m glad he left out the guy’s name.
Ohh yeah 5head
Lmao epic publicity stunt, ruin career to promote career
"BaD pUbLiCiTy Is StIlL pUbLiCiTy"
yeah the dude knew charlie is so desperate for views and video ideas that he would jump on this rather unexciting story.. well played
@@henkdachief That’s one way to think about it, but also could just be a “just incase” video so he doesn’t get harassed by Twitter kids who thinks it’s true if this blew up
Its funny how, if you pause Charlie mid sentence, and go pee, and come back and resume, you have no idea what he was talking about, you have to go back like 60sec to know what the context was
this is very specific
i wont say it’s not true though
Very specific
If u went to pee and someone changed the video to another one of charlie's you'd be continuing that vid like u have been watching it..
"JUST FUCKIN TUGGING ON HIS MEAT REAL HARD"
No, because it doesn't happen
"Valedictorian of vaginal air expulsion"
Not even Shakespeare could write such poetry
God I hate these bots, but true
@WANT S[Е]Х - check my vidео ! lol i cant tell if ur a bot also
There ya go, 1K
@@SlightlyInactive they are
The fact he can say that without laughing
“More people use carrier pigeons than twitch whispers” LMAO
The last time I used Twitch whispers was someone asking me for sex advice. I helped him a little bit but I was uncomfortable with it overall, so I said so and stopped replying. He got very upset and started just straight up attacking me until I blocked him. And that’s the last time I’ll ever use twitch whispers.
@@Arn._. last, and only time when i used it was when a small streamer from my country sent me a message to answer a question i asked that he didn't see during the stream lmao
@@cristifilip1626 Lmao when you have severe social anxiety but accidentally make it weirder
well he aint wrong.
its fascinating that pidgeons can bring mail to other people.
if im not mistaken Mike Tyson does it as well from time to time.
I only use Twitch whispers to Bully salty Americans when they lose against eu teams
The fact that the guy mentioned Charlie kinda plays in the direction that he made this thing up for some weird publicity stunt. Like why else would a guy want more attention if he is accused for something like that? I kinda hope that this is just a publicity stunt because it would be the least harmful scenario.
there isn't one charlie in the world. It might be some other random fucking guy named charlie.
If he did actually attempt to calll for Critikal then yes it's as you said.
Dude, you made the exact same comment as Rita - Only Fans - Free.
@@lazybum5392 except he didnt the dude who commented is the original commenter that rita person is a bot
@@lazybum5392 if you commented on it i would suggest instantly deleting your comment
@@lazybum5392 Tf? Can you tag me?
I remember there was this guy that was like the Chris Hansen of Discord. He would go around and pretend to be a 14-13y/o girl to catch nasty ass predators, but Discord kept fucking banning him. Like, dude. C'mon, Discord, you're focusing on the wrong guy here.
I pretended to be a predator and was baited to this 17 year old.=
Because it actually makes predators harder to catch lol, his evidence means little to nothing, the predator will never get arrested for a discord chat that can easily be fake or manipulated, it just makes predators more self aware and weary of potential baits. The court doesn't even acknowledge the majority of "To catch a predator" cases because they're "less than professionals" and that show actually makes the predators come in person.
@@garou9914 So true they even make it worse for the police if they were following or tracking the person they were baiting in to as a lot of the time because it was not a child but a adult pretending to be one is some cases they lose as not broken no law because it was not a child messaging them but some man that gets off on it pretending to be a child to catch people makes it easy for them to win court case and makes it harder in the future to charge them as they can use this as a defence. So all the predator catchers are making it worse only thing they do is put the persons life in danger when they spread the info online so people what to get them so police have to spend time resources and tax payers money relocating them that why people hate them so much on what they are doing.
@@giggity4670 yeah totally, besides they do it for attention mainly let's be honest, either by getting views or just getting treated as heroes. Like 2-3 years ago I used to do the same thing on discord, and a lot of pedos were falling for it, I thought I was doing something good, but to be honest I mainly just wanted the attention and getting treated like some kind of vigilante, but shortly after I realized that I was just making things worse without any real benefits, so I stopped.
@@KeysConFuoco Pretending to be a predator isn’t funny, though-
Man really tried summoning Charlie as if he was gonna be some support lmao
He basically kind of did
@@jacobmontemayor6685 "It looks like there's hard evidence, not just twitter bullshit".
Believing in innocent until proven guilty isnt defending someone, it's common sense. He's not getting in on mindless cancel culture, and I respect that.
@@LordZanas If the dude's intentions was trolling and getting clicks, no matter whether he's guilty or not, Charlie definitely helped him. Even me who hangs on LSF never even heard of the situation before watching this video.
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
Looks like EDP is a part owner of Twitch
Somebody needs to tell Cr1tikal that we will only watch him if he uploads Fortnite. This is why I have more popularity.
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 Who asked
@@vishg5148 Your Dad Asked
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 can confirm you're more popular than Cr1tikal.
unfunny
Imagine how awkward it would be if a stranger tries to get you to defend them out of no where for something you never heard of
Please report these ppl sending ytb links. Bunch of bottom feeders wtf comments are for talking about the vid.
@@Kitbats Seriously, in every comment there's like 10 of these guys spamming links. No one wants to watch their low grade videos.
Consider that all media always brands anyone accused of pedofila or rape instantly without evidence it would be pretty hard to get their side of the story, charlie on the other hand waits for evidence
It's probably a different Charlie
@@CatRockk don't go disliking the videos though, just report the comment. It might not be there videos could just as easily be someone trying to get a bunch of dislikes on someone's video.
You know it's bad when calling someone a teenie isn't the weird part.
i thought the term was tween
‘He’s a homie’
Charlie: who dat boy, who him is
Stand up guy him dont need no chair
Well where the fuck him at? cause, im right here
Gold
@@themanmyth The boy dripped swag like a broken faucet
@@kxnghypnos With his fuckin face blown off,
Thats how they found him
alleged predator: hes a homie
charlie: i dont know this guy
Bruh
*Alleged predator* was never my friend - D̶a̶n̶a̶ Charlie White
He meant a different charllie
@@Yos115 what the fuck does this mean Tony?
Are you two friends?
Predator: yes
Jesus: no
I was only half paying attention and heard "sodapoppin is a predator" and didn't realise it was a joke...that was a wild ride
I partially shat myself when I heard that
Same 😂
Same
Honestly chance is in my top 5 streamers where I’d be least surprised if they were
You just made me realize that he wasn't talking about sodapoppin
wait a second, his goal was to get cr1tikal's attention and make a video about it
YOU FEEL ON HIS TRAP!!!
If true, that’s 1000 IQ
@@mr.midnight23 Jump to 2000 iq
I want to feel your trap
“I'm gonna do what's called a Pro gamer move.”
@@PROD1_2 AYOOO
clout corrupts, there’s way too many famous people who are weirdos
yeah unfortunately
Somebody needs to tell Charlie that we will only watch him if he uploads Fortnite. This is why I have more popularity.
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 why is your name "men loving men" 😳
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 shut up
For real They weirdos most of them A lot of them are pedos I swear down.
I like how he tried to bring Charlie into it.
Me: gets caught for armed robbery
“Ah my good friend Charles White Jr can prove my innocence.”
@Arian Asistin Spammer get reported
it's not pedophilia if I tag a famous person!!!
Ah, I murdered a family of 7, but Penguinz0/MoistCr1tical/Chalie White shall prove that I'm not guilty
I'm your 700th like
I'm pretty sure there is more than one person named Charlie
I’m pretty sure he’s a troll, he probably mentioned Charlie hoping he’d make a video about the drama to attract more attention. He’s still live on twitch right now so he’s farming viewers.
Is this a big brain play
@@Toe_Pota Charlie outplayed him by covering his name then because I've never heard of this dude and have no desire to find him.
whos the streamer
@@number1plyr741 no one tell him
@@number1plyr741 his name is boku no pico
I'm so sorry to hear about what Sodapoppin' did to you but you're so brave for coming forward
Rip to the streamer that might actually have that name
@@FTWworlddomination sodapoppin is a pretty famous streamer lmao.
Are you talking to Charlie directly? I think he isn't the one being assaulted here
he wasnt banned for being a twitch predator, he was banned for being terrible at e-rp
Lmao for real
I dont think you grasp what the word roleplay means. "I'm horny" is not roleplay.
@@ronpaulssecretary well, technically, if you're not honry and are pretending to be horny, youre playing the role of being the horny one where there was never a horny one.
Horny.
lmfaooo
@@ronpaulssecretary anything can be rp lol
Imagine if he was talking about another Charlie lol, that would be funny
I was thinking this
It could be possible tho
@@deadman8006 yeah ik
Only other Charlie I know is my partner lmao
Yeah, like, this Charlie isn't the only Charlie in the world lol
Twitch mods slowly starting to turn into discord mods
They're about the same
@Evan Wibbenmeyer nah not rly
@@bladeoftheruinedking2543 yes really
Turning into Reddit admins.
@@bladeoftheruinedking2543 found the reddit mod
Standing in court:
"Your honor, hopefully Charlie can do a video about me and help prove my innocence."
Judge:
"What's his relation to you?"
Me:
"He's a homie."
Charlie: I’ve never met this man in my life!
“Uh, he’s my brother”
Charlie: adopted
"why don't you have a seat?"
*reveals dxracer gaming chair*
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
electric chair*
So weird. This dudes mindset was, "maybe i'll get someone to "expose" me as a preditor/pedo. Then i'll put out evidence that im innocent and bam everyone will follow and love me."
Or he did this to show his ugly wrinkly thing but yeah
That's quite smart, but the execution was terrible. Just wait 1 or 2 more years and there will be someone who does that on a whole another level
James Charles be like (except James is actually a p*do):
@Beast the Grim executioner thats not stupid bro, thats pure fucking evil. child predators are disgusting things. not even people. hes not stupid. he knows what he did. he did it anyway knowing what could happen.
Theory: he fakes being a pred, to then be proved innocent and get sympathy and charity and get attention.
Now he got negative attention thanks to his stupidity
That would be some serious galaxy brain shit. I dunno how likely that is
that would be a 300iq move he wasnt an idiot.
I mean it's 90% chance it's fake, it's literally like when story writers want it to end so they just do it with no logic. Y would he immediately want to dm her and ask for sex while streaming and who has a video of them jerking it saved and how did he send it while streaming and constantly message her and no one noticed anything
@WindTheBrave There are a lot of problems with what you're saying. First, yeah, the main part of society does like to jump the gun on accusations (although 90+% of the time the accusations are real), but there's an anti-society that overcorrects those missteps. There's a large audience that will support anyone accused of wrongdoing because they want to believe the accusations are false. Sometimes it ends with the accused being proven innocent, sometimes nothing is proven, but either way this audience will back the accused with blind faith, assuming it's faked.
You're also assuming the accused is acting with logic. This is a sex scandal, sex brain can destroy every logical thought that may come to you. You say the responses sound robotic, but if you're imagining an attractive woman on the other side with the same emotions as you, it doesn't matter what's being said to you if it's not directly negative (and even sometimes when it is).
You presume the poster has left out information, that they are acting in bad faith, but have no reason to believe this. The accused is just as capable of acting in bad faith, even if we assume that he's not genuinely trying to receive sexual attention.
"Real evidence" doesn't mean undeniably true. It means that it would be damning if it were true; evidence that, if proven to be genuine, would indisputably prove the allegations to be true.
Charlie:Nobody uses twitch
Wispers
Dr disrespect:😏
Remember kids: Not all publicity is good publicity.
Where do you get that art style thing from. So many people have it, wondering if there’s a website to create your own.
@@craigtucker309 it's called a picrew, theres a website where you can do a bunch of styles. I don't have a link to this one though sorry
@@TaliyahP it’s ok, thanks!
False
Good advice!
Discord screenshots are EXTREMELY easy to fake, and I would assume twitch whispers are easy as hell too. All you have to do is use the inspect tool, just highlight the text and then just right click and then left click on the option. BOOM, you can fake almost anyone saying anything (as long as you have dms with them) Edit: Nevermind, you don't even need DMs with them.
I used to fake discord screenshots for fun, once you have the font and the color codes, you can do that shit in MS paint easy. Hell, you don't even need the font, just letters and words. (which i did use along with MS paint)
AIM was easily faked back in the day, just had to copy username use the return key and start a new line. You could make anyone say anything and it was so simple but flew over alot of people's heads.
right, but if there is a video? thats sort of hard to fake. Idk what the video had, but if it was obviously him, then even if the person was baiting him, there was still intent. I'm not sure tho, things can be faked. thankfully there really isnt a victim here.
@@kitchipitchi but no one has proved the video is him, if i sent u a random video from pornhub it doesn't make me a predator.
You can also make new discord accs and let them chat with eachother with those names and pfps.
Is no one going to talk about how in the Reddit post, he says “I guess my name sounds like a girls name” implying that the streamer texted him out of nowhere and there was no anticipating this, but he just randomly pretends to be a girl anyway and goes full Chris Hansen on him at the end of the chat? I mean, I feel like if a popular streamer asked me in my DMs if I was a girl the last thing I’d do is just go along with it. Seems a bit fishy.
I always ask to myself how much free time have people like this guy who pretend to be an underage girl just to bait a streamer
I agree, but I've totally had a male streamer up in my dms EVERYDAY saying he misses me etc wants to get to know me better, saying I could move to Arizona where he lives etc AND I NEVER LED HIM ON AT ALL. the guy legit sits in storm wind allll day long targeting players who have female names. He did this to me at level fucking 30 before I was even max level just cuz I was inspecting his gear. I had to block him in order to be left alone. BUT that's not to say that's what's happening her. I'm also 24 so nothing bad actually went down
@@jasminemason1174 it's probably because u smell like chinese laundry
@@BOOG-2 What?
@@thekoi6096 why u liking ur own comment? do u smell like chinese laundry as well?
I've met people who are this straight forward online, it doesn't mean it's fake 100% of the time.
I love that the first action this dude takes is, "I'm making an LSF thread". This guy cares more about reddit silver than actually doing something.
Spidey loving that sandwich God damn
You go Peter
Ngl it’s probably the best way to get information about a streamer out to the world
@@billsmith4339 no, the first action should be to take it to the police not make an ‘exposed’ thread
@@Fredfazbear1983 kinda convinced that it's a fake for attention :/
more evidence is still needed
@@shoobzy3431 Vigilante's apparently interfere with investigations
Honestly if it’s made for publicity, it’ll make sense that he mentioned u even tho u have no relation to him. It’s a very easy way to get his name out there.
Makes sense it’ll get his name out and people would watch him to keep updated or criticize him and know his side or whatever. But then his following would drop within a week and have less then he started with. Idk people are odd
Ayo nice name bro 😳
@Anti Degenerate Ayo can we not self promote and if you do put it as a it’s own comment chain not in one? Thanks man.
Makes sense cuz he would get so many people to dislike him and not even earn shit, of course not
@Anti Degenerate easy disliked video
I mean if this was some orchestrated attempt to gain attention it's working well. Mentioning you literally got you to make a vid on it and without this I would have known nothing about them....but now I'm curious.
In both scenerios the guy is fucked. So he gets a awful reputation and loses everything. I dont think anyone would want that kinda clout
A bit far fetched but totally possible
@@fd7reel103 I 100% agree I'm not saying it was a good move at all but if somehow attention is what they wanted attention is what they got that's all.
Lmao 😂
agreed, people are more likely to avoid that channel, or if they do visit- spam fbi memes, spam hate posts, or rip on him for pulling scamshiz tactics.
I’m sorry but the way Charlie said “Playing the skin flute” in the most monotone way ever, made me cry laugh.
i like your profile pictureeere
I was dead when I heard him say that 😂😂
Breaking news, Charlie is now the only Charlie in the internet
I thought this was written in the Ten Commandments
Who is the other charlie?
@@oliviatobin3892 gotem
@Dhar Mann Enthusiast dont judge a charlie by its cover
@@oliviatobin3892 I heard that MoistCritical guy is named Charlie but I’m not sure on the accuracy of this
These dms are straight out of the EDP situation
@Arian Asistin American truck simulator
There's a massive difference between going after someone who is 13 and someone who is 17.
But after reading those tweets... maybe not in this case.
this could be fake
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
Why is it that it seems like every week there is a new predator coming to light? I wish there could be more positive news out there, because these situations really make me lose faith in humanity.
I've already lost faith in humanity
bold of you to still have any faith in humanity
@@chloefrazier6487 same. I lost mine so fucking long ago because of these degenerates on the internet
good news doesn't sell
it's your developing brain recognizing patterns
i don't know how this story ended, or if it has, but discord is the worst thing to use for evidence. as if it wasn't easy enough to fake screenshots, you could just go into the browser version and use inspect element to edit things further, and it's so easy to fake an account to look like someone else's since usernames don't have to be unique. i'd always be suspicious of discord proof just to be safe.
I've seen this before in practically every community. something that baffles me is when people try to fake screenshots, instead of just inspecting element and changing text and media, they edit it together from bits and screenshots in a photo editor. usually very poorly with no understanding of UI, and yet they still think it's gonna work. if you're gonna fake a discord convo, which are already so easy to fake, at least try a little. it's just embarrassing.
I'm realizing now this is very off topic but i needed to get my feelings out about this... LIE BETTER, PEOPLE... or don't...
@@ChadButt discord always has some of the dumbest and worst scammers and cons. It honestly feels like some of these people have below room temperature IQ with the stuff they try to pull. Marmite on toast would have a better scam pitch than some of them I've seen. A child telling their parents they didn't eat all the cake in the fridge while covered in chocolate is more convincing than them. It's bizarre to me that people fall for it.
Charlie:"today we are gonna be talking about a serious topic"
Also Charlie not even a minute later:"at the vending machine soda poppin was grabbin on my nutsack and it was getting weird when he was pullin the hairs"
😂
when
1:51
Also he said washing machine so i said the wrong thing lol
@@GamerScottYT thanks
@Anti Degenerate f u
@Anti Degenerate contradictory username
Wait, his fans call him "m'lord"? That... actually sounds like it might be a (terrible, dogshit) satire or a troll thing.
@Arian Asistin Does it look like we care?
@@philipscheidegger8054 silly goose! We can’t see each other’s faces!
What streamer is he talking about?
who is it
Report for spam
Discord msg screenshots are useless, you can literally use discord's built in Inspect Element tool to edit a message to say anything you want and use any pfp or username you want.
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
That is why discord support doesn't accept screenshots of any kind. They only accept the message link. And if the person has deleted the messages then you can't report them xd
Any and all screenshots are like that. You can open up the developer console in any given web browser and just change what's on the screen and take a screenshot
this is a thing that's very easy to do, once in my school some guy made a snapchat account, named it some kid he didn't like then sent some very bad words and screenshotted it then sent it to the school and he got expelled. This is is a very different case but it's an example of how texts are so easy to fake
@@IsaacEyes
Goddamn.
Seems people have forgotten that "Charlie" is a name, and, many people just so happen to have the name "Charlie."
How many famous youtubers that can also be referred to as Charlie exist?
@@spaghettboy2173 Taking the videos context, it only says "Charlie will defend me." You're setting the bar low by assuming I meant famous RUclipsrs.
@@thekingkaiju9385 Still. By him stating Charlie will defend me it is assuming that both him and the person reading can understand who Charlie is. So it goes to reason that it would be a household name
@@spaghettboy2173 The two that were talking clearly have some form of familiarity. They possibly know some of the same people. They could possibly both know someone named Charlie.
@@spaghettboy2173 Now, maybe he is referring to Critical, but, seeing as that hasn't been 100% confirmed, it is still likely that dumbass was just talking about another Charlie.
This streamer: “You will save everything for me!”
Charlie: “I don’t even know who you are”
ruclips.net/video/K3cmr_paJNk/видео.html
www.youtube.com
www.google.com
That comment makes no sense
@Captain Zorc i’m confused what are these links people are spreading?
charlie: no one uses twitch whispers
his mods: ….
@WANT S[Е]Х - check my vidео ! wtf are these comments y doesnt utube delete this shit
@@cpt.lando333 lol RUclips is horny
@@killerdoc1077 very funny 5 year old child.
@@Ilivepuppys I am not even under 17 XD
@@killerdoc1077 Yes child whatever you say.
“Satchmo” is a real guy who used to play trumpet and actually did what a wonderful world
I bet his Arm was Strong
Jokes are really funny when you explain them.
ur wrong it's a big hairy ape man
Louis Armstrong
@@GurKinGler funnies are really jokes when you don't think about it.
Using twitch whispers to sext a minor is very DISTRESPECT-ful 💀
5:55 I cannot stand how much of a buzzword “groom” has become where it’s used so liberally by people that obviously don’t have a fucking clue what it means. Grooming is a very long, pretty much years long process normalizing decrepit behavior, ultimately tricking the victim into accepting it and loving them no matter how horrible the things they do to them.
This right here isn’t that at all. This is sending sexually explicit material to a minor that entirely took place in the span of less than an hour. Both examples are bad. Both are pedophilic in nature. But they aren’t the same thing and I hate it when these buzzwords just become another all encompassing word for anyone you don’t like.
(This isn’t about Charlie btw; I’m aware he didn’t call this grooming in his own words so he’s fine)
I had a relative that was groomed. It's terrifying seeing the effects it can have on someone, that they really don't understand and defend the behaviour of someone preying on a weakness. It's sickening.
There's another term for something like what happened here, isn't there?
@@tk0192 yeah. It’s pretty much attempted child sexual exploitation/attempted engagement of digital sexual interaction with a minor more specifically.
Is it accurate to compare it to Stockholm syndrome grooming that is
@@jameslowe4031 Depends how you compare it. You could say victims in both cases are forming positive bonds with bad people.
A captive person forming an emotional bond with their captor is irrational, but a child doesn't have the ability to rationalize the situation because they're too immature to know what's right or wrong.
So I wouldn't compare them like they're the same thing, but they are fairly similar on the surface.
I also wouldn't listen to strangers on the internet. Draw one of those crossy-circle things in and do some credible research. Post it on Reddit for that sweet gold and karma lol
@@jameslowe4031 I would say more so, as someone who had experienced such, actual grooming may lead to the development of Stockholm Syndrome, but the two directly invite no comparison between. 'One thing leads to another'
Charlie's use of english is literally Godlike, its the equivalent of "if Im buying the speedometer, Im using the whole speedometer".
It's talent, mixed with hard work and genuineness, though never thought of it as a talent "for the use of English". However, that's exactly what it is.
I get the vibe that he orchestrated this whole thing, called for you to make a video exonerating him knowing shit wasn't true, so you'd get to the bottom of it, and he'd get all of the publicity. Tl;dr he made all this up, wants you to clear him, and he gets publicity and be viewed sympathetically as a victim.
A rather bold move for some fame if that ends up being the case.
did this need a tldr? No it didn't
Homie really added a tl;dr that was basically the same length
Tl;dr he scheming for clout
I love how your tl;dr is just as long as what you first typed
For every inch of hair length determines Charlie's personal net worth. Each inch equals $1 million of net worth. The hair tells me Charlie is around $14,000,000... Me, I'm bald, so yes it's a very accurate measurement.
This is a big "you took everything from me"
"I don't even know who you are"
Moment
You will.
Him mentioning Charlie was just a way to get Charlie to make a video about him. Seems like a really shitty publicity stunt
Didn't even fully work If that's the case, Charlie didn't mention whoever this guy's name is.
@@TheSweetSpirit I mean I guess it’s not too hard to find his name
It could be a different charlie who knows
@@TheSweetSpirit people could easily do a bit of googling and figure it out.
@WindTheBrave ...can ya put this into shorter words? I'm genuinely curious to your point here, but i have pretty bad adhd, so its hard for me to keep track and read long paragraphs without getting lost and confused.
“I actually haven’t heard the word teenie, since I was a teenie.”
@Anti Degenerate
>"Joined 5 months ago."
>"559 comments."
@@mareksicinski3726 Just pointing out how pathetic the bot is.
@@ar.6968 yeah with the name 'Anti Degenerate' and an anti-lgbtq pfp 😐
@@ar.6968 ew I didn’t even notice their pfp till you said something about them
@@yoink297 It’s probably some closeted guy who doesn’t want anyone to suspect him of being gay
"the tesla of farting"
there were are, the phrase of the century has been found
i miss the time the word 'grooming, was only used in the context of cutting bodyhair and beard
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
Its too kind a word
Twitch is just being Twitch... nothing new ever comes out (except for charlie’s amazing streams)
All bots lol
It's full of streamers in their mid 30s who have barely 18 year old gfs moving out to their houses one after another.
Charlie doesn't even need to self promote, his fans do it for him.
@@Mariet31 what kind of twitch have you been using? All I see is dudes in their 20s juiced up on gamer gunk or women exploiting themselves for money
Emphasis on "Alleged" but also, knowing this society, emphasis on "Twitch."
If Charlie doesn’t start playing Fortnite I’m coming after him. This is why I have more popularity because I play Fortnite.
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 sureeeeeee, btw im reporting every comment of yours I find
@@teare8972 Your work is appreciated soldier
@@mlmamazingqualityvldeos6079 you have 2 subs mate
@@teare8972 hell yeah lets go
I was going to defend him because their ages are so close but after hearing what was in those chats I'm gonna just keep my mouth shut.
yeah
how old is he
@@Gwazi 18
@@wystrix439 He was 18 and the girl he thought he was talking to said she was 17? I don’t get it. That’s not bad
@@Gwazi I lied, I don’t know how old he is
“Stop talking to kids” -Abraham Lincoln
"Stop talking to kids" -Sun Tzu
Conversation between Abe and the 50% who went to war over it. "Why should WEEEEEEEEE get rid of OUUUURRRRR slaves, we are responsible slave owners! Just because HEEEEEE mistreats HISSSSS slaves, doesnt mean WEEEE do. I only use MYYY slaves to protect my family. I keep my slaves, locked in a safe." Jim Jeffries
@@paddington1670 calm the fuck down bro
@@paddington1670 5/10 made me reply
@@paddington1670 waht da fuk brah
"There's no such thing as bad publicity." -message taken to the heart.
wut
The Wolf of Wallstreet reference?
@@Karim-rf5go pretty sure it isn't vut whay so ia know my rdog is biimtignng my hand im fuckubg dyinv
Who was the streamer tho
I’ve been following Charlie since 2010 and he‘s still the most authentic person I’ve encountered on YT
Damn, I sometimes forget he's been around that long. I didn't find him until 2014
@@FauxGemini My teen-self assumed I was listening to the disembodied voice of a fully grown man and only years later find out we’re the same age. Wouldn’t be surprised to learn he just spawned into existence as is.
@@ouija__bored he's kind of timeless sounding I agree, he has simultaneously amazing insights and the stupidity/naivety of somebody fresh out of their twenties, and I appreciate him for it
I programmed Siri to called me “Grandmaster Titties” in 2011 because Charlie referred to a pirate pig in a Dora video game as that and I just haven’t changed it. Sometimes I forget and when I send emails from my iPhone it signs it with that monicker. It’s an L I’m willing to take
Well well well....I guess twitch whisper scored another strike
Streamer: Charlie will back Me up
Charlie: "I am not your friend"
Is this a Ludwig reference?
I never was
Ludwin
NOT YOUR PERSONAL ARMY
@@VerreCroix next we need to change qtcinderella clips to qtwinderella
Why does almost everyone think he is talking about this Charlie? As if there's only one person in the world named Charlie.
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
Yeah probably Charlie Chase
because he is a twitch streamer and youtuber with a big audience who goes by Charlie. All of which is implied in the statement he made. There is most likely a handful or less of possible people.
@@cheminem That's just wrong. We don't know the alleged's life, and so family or friends or people by association any of them can be named Charlie. Just because Mr. Cr1tikal is the most well-known does not mean by default every Charlie means him.
@@mexamrc But if you remember in the video title he said that “Charlie would make a video and defend him” so I don’t think it’s any of his family or friends
Plot twist: The guy who put Charlie's name in the title of his video claiming he would help created this for the purpose of drawing attention to his channel used Charlie as a boost by manufacturing this series of events himself
@Anti Degenerate your sad bro
The guys twitch is gone.
@@DuckitTTV who was it
@@name8826 WithAWonder I believe.
@@DuckitTTV thanks
I've been going thru old vids and it's fun watching Charlie's hair grow over time
I swear there's no single person on earth that doesn't look cringy using "hehe" Holy shit.
Hehe... agreed
I hear the hehe from some music I forget and it annoys me because it's bad so I understand you
@@StainsStainsStains hehe
@Its hip to timetravel no wonder you are lonely
id say its better with more e's
"heehee"
I don't think that they person was referring to this charlie, it could be a friend so it's weird to assume they meant Critikal.
For the allegation, i have some doubts, mainly because of how the person responded (telling the person that they were specifically making a reddit thread instead of going to the police), how 0-100 the streamer got with first getting info to immediately sending pics, and how the streamer talked.
That what I was thinking
I disagree and believe he intentionally drug Charlie into this. Everything I've seen in this video has a consistent logic like it was planned in advance. The ridiculous "evidence" that seems like a parody of itself sets up the "he was framed" narrative in a believable way; preying on people who relate to false accusations. Especially when he asks Charlie for help. He's forcing Charlie to make a response video addressing the situation using Twitter mobs harassing Charlie for answers, meanwhile the Twitter mob does all the work for him and further supporting his narrative he was framed.
That all being said, I'm exclusively going off this video and haven't watched the guys streams. You don't know someone until you see them live, and my opinion may change, but "edgy cringelord hatches brilliant plan to garner sympathy" seems most likely.
There was nothing illegal about that interaction. Even if the victim was 17-18yo girl it wouldn't be illegal as the predator didn't solicit pics. He was just a creepy racist asshole. I think getting him deplatformed is really the only action that would lead to anything happening, at best you get a police report, but I highly doubt you'd even get that.
@@shaftslammer dragged, not drug
drug is heroine
@@libidinalmaterialist9470 Except he sent them inappropriate messages and videos without their consent, which is sexual harassment of a minor lol
Dude doesn't even know how this person looks, never asked for a pic and instantly sent nudes of himself.
How can this possibly be real?
I think you doubt the lengths horny people go to
@Ivan G Oh, so you do that stuff then?
Yes, it’s happened to me many times. They really don’t care.
guys send random pics of themselves nude without any prompting all the time
This probably isn't real as I wouldn't trust anything you find on twitter or reddit or wherever this was located, but people sending nudes to people with no idea who they are is definitely a thing.
well well welll it seems like dr disrespect had a precursor
People: Are you guys friends?
This guy: yes
Charlie: No
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
I believe he's talking about someone else, named "charlie". Idk why people on twitter not thinking and just pinging Critikal.
@@klondor7432 it could possibly be that, but i'm just making the joke just to make it
@@WishyWashyMF Ik, I'm talking about those on twitter, they be doing too much.
This comment : a waste of bandwidth.
It does seem fishy, but the sending a video after like 4 messages is not odd to me. I've had dudes add me on snapchat or whatever and the VERY FIRST message they send is a D pic or video. So that part is believable... but uh... it does seem fake in other ways. Congrats to him if it is fake, I guess, since anyone who may have cared about him now thinks he's the worst kind of person, so... yay...
Don't worry, i'd say most guys think it's weird too, like buy a girl dinner before you slap dick on the table atleast, geez.
Those are likely bots btw
@@kingvadanite1816 man if only. You get your personalized “useless whore” replies after rejection
@@omega1231 happens far too many times sadly
@@cats1970 Hahaha fair enough then
Trying to have a serious conversation with my fiancé and we put on a random video for privacy. Not long after hitting play on the video, the conversation came to an immediate halt and we both erupted with laughter when we heard the words “queef queen” leave charlies mouth.
Or “ valedictorian of vaginal explosion”
queef queen? GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
2 years later anyone know what happened?
Charlie: Satchmo isn't real
Louie Armstrong: *sad trumpet noise*
On point hahahahaha
@Anti Degenerate We get it, you go to special ed classes. You don't need to keep telling us.
@@conman1111 i don't agree with making fun of the disabled
HOWEVER
@@themyofmy im autistic and i don't give a shit roast that anti degenerate Anti Degenerate
Edit: the second anti degenerate is me saying the name of the anti degenerate
The thing that’s so worrying is that twitch people have such a reputation of abusing status to groom young girls that it would be incredibly easy to frame someone with minimal effort. I went through the same thing when I was young, a stupid little girl on discord who thought that the men were trustworthy because they were older. It’s horrible, so I can’t imagine how horrible it is to be accused of doing something so rancid. Regardless, I really don’t know what’s gonna go down.
Totally agree
It’s not really discriminate with just girls
@@____o____279 of course it doesnt happen to just girls, I was stating my experience and how the majority *are* girls haha
And then there’s the inverse, where people become so wary of false accusations that they accuse everyone who doesn’t have hard evidence of lying. It’s awful all around
@@SuperSimputer very true.
I highly respect not showing the guy’s name just in case it’s fake.
Who is the dude though?
It won't do much, people are so quick on the draw that as soon as they hear the word Allegation they get straight to cancelling whoever is accused rather than wait until there is undisputable evidence that they are either guilty/not guilty.
Happened with Pyrocynical not too long ago.
@@acidous1276 yeah it might not do much but it’s still just a good thing to do. Especially for the future. If this guy turns out innocent, and in some 5-10 years if this video randomly starts getting a lot of views again, it’ll be a lot harder for people to dig up the full story and then harass the guy about it.
And if it turns out he’s guilty, well, he’ll probably be in jail anyways LMAO
@@MarioLuigi0404 I wouldn't say he's completely innocent if it turns out to be fake. Either way, this is a fucked situation.
@@TibsSR yeah that depends too. If this was a publicity stunt or something he’s definitely not totally innocent.
This guy is how the internet tends to portray the average Reddit user.
you
you
You
you
you
Appreciate how fair you are about these things. Like you obviously care if this dude is actually a predator, but having the healthy skepticism is needed in these situations because, very unfortunately, people love to fake these kind of things. And if the streamer is the one orchestrating it that's dumb and fucked up.
Using twitter as an example, I definitely felt like people on there ran with things without taking a step back to consider what actually happened. Like they don't even seem to care about victims, they just like to dogpile on people. I wish more people could be considerate to those who make these allegations while also not jumping in straight away.
This doesn’t seem legit to me. He “finds” girls by randomly dming girlish sounding names and also used the n word too? I mean, it kinda seems suspect that the accuser would claim he’s going to post it to reddit and then the streamer would start using the n-word. Really too stupid a move to make, I think. Everything looks a little suspect about this.
Was it hard r
@@Poliswag7 doesnt really matter does it mate, this is most likley fake asf
Feel bad for any guy named stuff like Sam or Kelly lmao
sus
Oh no scary n word ;(((((
"valedictorian of vaginal air expulsion" Charlie has peaked
@@creatorzp ouch
If most of the people he’s done it to before are actually teens, they typically don’t report. They feel special when older guys hit on them. I’ve never met a teenager who doesn’t think they’re more grown than they are, and they realize when they’re older what happened was wrong
I don't understand why people were tagging you in this situation when he could have been talking about anyone Charlie is a common name
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
No. Charlie is the only REAL CHARLIE! What do you mean?! Please try to prove me wrong, as you clearly cant :kek:
Nonsense. Charlie has consumed all other Charlies for their power. He is The One.
Charlie is the most mature person on RUclips. The first video of his I saw was him playing a shitty Smurfs game where he had problems jumping over a fence the second screen in. I love our timeline sometimes
The way the "screenshots" make him immediately be creepy asf then go to immediate racial slurs make me think they're fake lol, like it just seems like making the dude say anything cancellable, I have no clue who he is so not defending him in any way lol
that and use of twitch whispers
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
@@markwage2209 Stop spamming links
And even the twitter replay being only 1 minute old, seems everything pointing at some lame clout chasing attempt? At least i'm really hoping it is!
Apparently that is not so uncommon. People are stupid and horny. Btw can I show you something?
(it's a joke)
'The valedictorian of vaginal air expulsion' is not a sentence I thought would make me expulse air through my nose.
I respect Charlie's belief of innocent until proven guilty so much. I don't know the guy, or anything else about the situation. So it's not ok to judge until it's proven.
If it is then fuck that guy
If it's false, then I hope this doesn't affect him to much.
Whaaat someone level headed on the internet and not willing to jump to conclusions without evidence? That’s impossible.
Seems pretty substantial right now
fr fr, I'm also glad there's influencers who're supporting that type of mindset. The internet loves to get mad and bandwagon, so it's nice to see someone who's teaching people to think critically and come to their own conclusions
@@spanigh9735 Well it's like charlie said though. The evidence provided does seem damning, until you look a bit closer and see how weird it is. Like for example, how aggressive our supposed predator is, and how there is no other reported cases. It's a weird situation.
@@--Cat-- that’s a good point, guess we’ll have to wait and see considering these allegations are still pretty new
"He's a homie"
Charlie "Chris Hansen, aim to maim, then to kill"
@@mareksicinski3726 Why don't you have a seat right there.
@@justinward3679 LMAO WHATD THEY SAY
Every part of this screams "I want attention, and I don't care how I get it." Him mentioning you without even knowing you is a very obvious nudge to try and get you to speak about it in order to accelerate the rate at which people talk about this. Plus, nobody is stupid enough to be like "Oh no! I committed a crime! Time to ask every person around me how to wipe my hard drive as suspiciously as possible!" Everything he did was an intentional act to try and make it blow up-- the complete opposite thing a real predator would do.
ruclips.net/video/y-4peypLlKA/видео.html
He's still a creep tho, a pretty gay creep
Dude just mentioned a Charlie, not our Charlie.
Furrys get the °°°°
Fur 🤮
I think leaving the streamer's name off this was a good idea. I just want to say, for anyone concerned that this is bait/a hoax/a false accusation: right now, you're right, we can't prove it's true. I personally am not looking for this person to have their career ruined or be deplatformed (at least not without harder evidence). However, people's personal safety > Twitch streamers' careers in terms of relative importance (especially minors' personal safety). Speaking openly about allegations like this and investigating them while giving the survivor/victim the benefit of the doubt, is the safest way to do this. I don't think just trying to find the truth, or even one person warning another "hey just be careful getting too close/parasocial with this person, because there do exist these allegations," is equivalent to finding someone criminally guilty without due process (which is the kind of logic that people always end up bringing out when allegations like this come up).
If the allegations turn out to be false, yes, this person's career on Twitch may take a hit, which isn't fair since they didn't do anything. However, people can repair their careers (and also you can just get a different, non-internet job), and tbh from what I've seen in the past in similar cases, even actual predators are able to still have careers in the public eye. So I think this person will probably survive.
If the allegations turn out to be true, but we do nothing, it could actually endanger some people. Again, I think their personal safety is a bigger gamble to take than someone's career, although obviously I'd rather not gamble with either.
I think it can be easy to see some headlines where someone's allegations were proven false (or even just proven to have some holes in them without being fully debunked), or to watch/read stories about people lying about these kinds of crimes, and to get the idea that false allegations are really common and normal. It's called confimation bias; we remember a given situation more easily, because it was memorable/sensational, and so we get the impression that it happens more often, even if it doesn't. This doesn't mean someone is less intelligent or gullible for having confirmation bias; it's a thing our brain often automatically does as a survival method.
Statistically, allegations of sexual misconduct tend not to be false. It's much more likely for allegations like these to be corroborated and for other evidence to be found, than it is for someone to be shown to be lying about what happened to them (and most often, even when these allegations are proven false, it later turns out that the accuser was actually still the victim of this type of crime, they just lied about who committed it to protect the real culprit for various reasons; usually the real culprit was a family member or authority figure). *Statistically, you are at a much greater risk of experiencing sexual assault/abuse yourself, than you are of being falsely accused of sexual assault/abuse.* These statistics don't necessarily mean that things like false allegations can never happen to anyone, but they mean that if you needed to pick one scenario to go with on limited information, in terms of what actions you might take for your own or someone else's safety, there's one scenario that is much more likely to be true than the other, and so is a "safer" bet.
That said, that scenario only applies to things like "should I be alone/let my younger siblings be alone with this person," not "should this person have a platform." I guess I'm just trying to head off a lot of the discourse we normally see on the internet every time some allegations get made, even before people necessarily know who the allegations are against, because unfortunately, a lot of the time, we get taught to mistrust people making these types of accusations. This narrative we get taught may or may not have something to do with the incredibly large amount of sexual predators that seem to be infesting our cultural, political, and social institutions, and manage to rise to positions of power in them.
(and it's another essay-comment; sorry everyone)
... are you on adderall
@@Ohmyadeline more than likely. I used to he prescribed it, and basically what would happen is i would blink and suddenly be 45 min deep in a comment section argument. Not really, i would have one of these essays posted in what seemed like 18 seconds tho. Adderall really fucks a kid up if they dont need it, which almost everyone.
@@Ohmyadeline hahaha
don't cry