Want more from Jesse Lyu? Watch the full interview of him by Jason Calacanis: ruclips.net/video/X-MNgciL5hw/видео.htmlsi=YH5qAuMLZOQkyOyK Or watch part 1 of my investigation here: ruclips.net/video/NPOHf20slZg/видео.htmlsi=TXLzZXTY0MoiJuO0
Basically Rabbit just forked someone's cool web scraping project, and made it LAME by adding hard coded commands 😝 They're ruining AI like they ruined web3
Great Video. You forgot to mention that ChatGPT and perplexity running in the background costs API fees to rabbit against the original $200 device purchase that doesn't require a subscription. It is a classic pump and dump, because Rabbit will soon lose its device profits from paying API fees and have to turn off peoples access to the APIs or face significant losses on their initial sales from never ending API costs, without any subscription model to facilitate it.
Brian Deer (who helped debunk the MMR-Autism scare) said the same thing. It's a tried and true sign that there is something further beneath the surface.
Funnily enough, thats an actual thing called the Streisand Effect. Basically, quite a few years ago, a photo leaked of Barbara Streisand's house location. Streisand sued the person resposible and that lawsuit was a big in the news at that point. Through that, many people saw that photo and learned of its location. TL:DR, She sued the photographer so the photo would stay buried, but in turn made it more widely known
overpromise, deliver nothing, and then hope you can scrounge together at least 10% of the advertised features within the first 5 years after everyone has already dumped their money into it. that's the beauty of modern startups
How to tell if a tech company is ripping off investors: Ask basic question such as "does this work?" or "why won't this work?" Answer: "you don't have the qualifications to determine if it works".
I was fully expecting something like this: "Tell everyone I'm going to be late." "... downloaded contacts list, sending "I'm going to be late" to 124 contacts-"
@@davidreynolds731yeah now that I think about it, if rabbit had done anything we can’t be mad at it because “tell everybody I’m late” is an impossible task given coffee never gave rabbit context on who everybody is supposed to be
FYI, most engineers that get asked about their tech are usually very enthusiastic to ramble about technical stuff. Software engineering is a continuous development field. People who say, "You can't criticise my work, you're not an expert" are usually frauds or uptight. If someone were to look at my personal projects and ask, what does this do, I'd go oh it does this, I'm really proud of it :)
same here, especially with pull request reviews, it’s nothing personal yknow? i don’t even want to look at my code from a year ago, and that’s what’s good about the continuous feedback, you’re constantly improving.
the statement by Rabbit on protecting patents and that the engineers only see part of the product is literally what Elizabeth Holmes's strategy was at Theranos
This is a great call out, as someone who read Carryrou's book and watched the HBO documentary. These guys are a fraud....amazing that Coffee caught them. Their world is about to implode.
@@alang.2054 This argument sounds to me like "you can't say that those aren't what human hands look like because you don't know anything about AI!" I know what human hands look like. Those don't look like human hands, they look like an abomination. The UI developer doesn't have to know what the "totally real" AI looks like, because they know what Playwright looks like, and if the "super advanced" AI is achieving the exact same result as non-AI products that already exist, then it's contributing absolutely nothing. Would you like to try again?
Yeah, con men usually prey on people who are insecure and somewhat desperate. The group least likely to question you. When faced with serious scrutiny, they have to create the impression that their critics are people just too stupid to understand this 'great' thing they're pushing. Leverage whatever you can to create the impression your critic is stupid and should be ignored. I don't think I've ever seen someone with a good product get angry when asked simple questions about how their product works. Sure there are annoying hecklers and even good people can be pushed into snapping, but someone getting unreasonably mad about simple questions is usually an indication they know they're grifting.
The main issue is that literally EVERYTHING is called "AI" these days. Even basic scripts are called AI in every single sector. It's insane. I've seen billion dollar companies call STANDARD SCRIPTS "AI" when they are far from AI.
Remember 'The cloud'? "Our service is going to be so much better from now on". Every used-car-salesman-in-tech. This Rabbit-toy is just a bunch of macros, clicking on buttons on some sites.
@@midnightblue3285 The definition of "AI" is pretty much "Something that can solve more than 1 problem", so most of the people touting that their product uses "ai" are right, it's just stupid to say that. It's like saying the grapes you sell are boneless.
@@midnightblue3285machine learning is basically a subset of AI. It's using computer algorithms to essentially "teach" a computer how to do a task based on feedback from prior attempts. It's AI, plain and simple (unlike some things marketed as "AI" that are just rudimentary scripts that do something absurdly simple like open a file in a particular program). If you want to kinda distinguish "machine learning" from "AI," you'll have to delve into the biological realm. And I do mean literally here. A neural net (complete with actual biological neurons, often rat nerve cells but it could theoretically be any biological nerve cell), couldn't really be considered artificial intelligence. At best, it would be biological intelligence supplemented with artificial intelligence based algorithms. But the black box effect is entirely biological in such a system, meaning you really can't call it purely AI. That being said, there are actual algorithms that can simulate a neural net using electronics alone. They aren't quite as black box as the biological counterparts, but they are still sufficiently complicated that they are generally accepted/referred to as a black box (even though all the code is literally there, it just produces complex enough results that it's considered effectively a black box). In contrast, a biological neural net is TRULY black box, at least given the technology we have right now (as there really isn't an explanation, even on an insanely technical level, about everything that goes into the "decision" of such a device. It isn't an artificially created barrier from code, it's a fundamental lack of knowledge about biological systems themselves)
Another problem with their LAM, even if it did work: violating site terms of service. Most companies don’t want bots scraping their sites let alone making purchases.
Yep, sites set their own terms about scraping, and they usually don’t allow it. If there’s a CAPTCHA, it’s because you’re not supposed to bot the site. Rabbit will face some legal issues here in addition to fraud.
oh my god, youre a random youtube comment on quick view, but if somebody wants to throw a stick in their wheels this can actually kill the company lol because they are violating multiple TOS
To be honest, thats pretty common with LLMs, I dont believe this was a result a of them being dishonest. Not being clear about using a wrapper around ChatGPT was though.
That's industry standard, there is a whole lot of stuff that goes into those prompts beforehand like "don't tell the user to harm themselves" etc on various models which you might think is obvious and should have been RLHF'd out of the model but some still need it
I would not want to live in a world where a product such as this actually worked. Great work by Coffee relieving my fears of the machines taking over ;)
The worst argument someone can say is "are you an expert?", in that logic if a plane crashes I can't assume that something was faulty because I don't know how planes work.
@kittybelly I lost all of my notes when I bought a new phone AND NONE OF THEM TRANSFERRED OVER. At least my scribbles, barely legible as they are, are written on a notepad.
@@PlaceBotoxTechnically if you get a new notepad the notes won't transfer over either... At least with a phone there are lots of notetaking apps that do transfer over easily.
Exactly!!! That’s what blows my mind here! Why would anyone want this? Everything it does is already possible with other tech! Like, “start my morning routine”? It’s called an alarm clock!
Coffee: "Hey this car has no engine!" Rabbit: "Are you an automotive engineer? How do you know it has no engine? Where are your credentials?" Coffee: "But this is just three corgis on a on a treadmill under the hood." Rabbit: "You're not being objective or working with us in good faith." Coffee: (⊙＿⊙')
"Engineers often only have access to parts of the system" -- this is Theranos. The goldfish memory of VCs and tech consumers is the gift that keeps on giving to con artists.
It's a different experience to see CEO of a million dollar company behave like 5 years old. Like that "You Are Not My Boss"was totally playground slander.
@@UnprofessionalProfessor If you are selling a product, the people who buy it from you are in fact your boss. You are legally obligated to fulfill their expectations based on what you promised them, once they have handed you their hard earned money. Being in charge of a company means shouldering the burden of risk that comes with running that company.
I'm an assistant researcher in AI field. Ever since this product announced on kickstarter all our colleagues in university have been mocking it and knowing it's going to be a joke.
@@midnitejesus tbh if people are dumb enough to think this is legit, convincing them will probably fall to deaf ear. It's how most scam like these manage to work.
@@IdiotamSpielenno ppl will say other authorities agree with them to validate their position. If many ppl who study this thing agree with me that is evidence that I am right since it has overcome scrutiny and ppl trying to prove me wrong. That is different then you don’t study this so you can’t tell me I’m wrong.
@@justanothercommenterwithan9089 That is the argument to authority... The very definition of it. Every time you cite a source instead of proving everything on your own you use the argument to authority... to the authority of your source, to be precise...
I would guess they certainly use the playwright record feature. Whenever it breaks they just go in and record the clicks again. So pretty far from fancy
the sad thing, the product was advertised as the equivalent of some free phone apps that already existed and were implemented poorly and people bought continued to buy into it...
I love how the device just STOPPED trying to give recommendations after a while. Like a fed up parent saying "well just STARVE then" to a picky child. I guess it's easier to give up rather than keep throwing darts at a map trying to figure it out?
@@JankJank-om1opthat would be better because at least you got some chicken. very overpriced chicken, about 6 times more than your average chicken maybe, but it's still chicken 🤷🏻♀️
I mean... At first it tried with what bad tracking they use, but once he gave the 100 Miles off it's impossible to even figure it out. If your information is "it's there" 100 miles in any direction is a lot of options that simply can't be pinpointed.
I tried joining the discord to check out the community response. Turns out they're blocking all new-joiners unless you show proof of ownership of an R1 and they've started mass-banning anyone who criticizes the product in any way. Wholesome moment.
*joins discord out of curiosity* “Hey, what is this new product about? What does it do?” Admins and mods: *explain everything in a cheesy grandiose way that makes them sound smart* Me: “that’s really interesting, but I don’t quite understand it. mind if I ask some questions?” *gets banned from server!*
The Rabbit is a hunk of junk. What a scam. Probably made in a sweat shop in China with child Labour. Scammers be Scammers and Coffeezilla will get them! That or one of the other great channels that does this work. I love this stuff, its very entertainment and does good work in society exposing scammers as well as helping better educate the general consumer. I am a victim myself of a crypto scam back during the pandemic. I lost a lot of money, like 20K USD. I am happy to say I learned from that and have since recovered well. I look at it as better to lose that amount of money which was painful but tolerable than losing 400K down the road which I am happy to say will never happen.
The fact that they can’t confirm LAM existing in their final statements and immediately went on the defensive shows everyone what a scam this product is
they came so prepared, made enough money to pay legal fees and still have a fortune left. They did great actually, i hate watching these kinds of videos. Everything is revealed, yet no consequences exist
@@terrormilk384Not necessarily. SBF is in jail, Celsius guy goes on trial in September. And this guy's reputation is shot even if there aren't ultimately any fraud charges.
As someone who has closely followed AI in the last years, i immediately knew that this was going to be a scam when i heard about it. The reason is that training a model like ChatGPT costs BILLIONS of dollars to create - money that Rabbit absolutely didn't have at the time. Furthermore, almost all of the major innovation in AI models over the last few years came from the big players like Google, OpenAI or Microsoft. The sad reality of this technology is that one of the main drivers of new capabilities is literally compute, which is so expensive, that it completely excludes small players from the market. Also, a model that could reliably interact with the internet and software would be a BIG deal, so you can be certain that companies like OpenAI are also working on that. And if they didn't figure it out yet, a small startup founded by a design company absolutely won't.
@@theforsakeen177 yeah, I think "billions" may be an exaggeration. I've heard numbers more like $100 million or so. I suppose that's still within Elon's budget. Also is Grok really comparable in functionality to the latest and greatest models from OpenAI / Google / Microsoft? I'm not sure.
@@theforsakeen177 I'm pretty sure grok is built on some existing OpenAI's code. Elon used to (maybe still does idk) have a stake in OpenAI. And one of the initial decisions they made was to have som part of it be open source? Again, don't quote me on this since I've only loosely followed it through news articles.
I get it's not really their business, but I do wonder why companies like OpenAI or Google would not say anything about this product, I get they are huge corporations, but if their goals are to promote their own products, they would probably want to defend their own things in a way by disproving Rabbit
"protecting our most valuable intellectual property from unauthorized access, or in the worst case, theft." I don't think the Rabbit team should worry, in order to attract thieves you need something worth stealing.
In order to steal something, you need to have something to steal in the first place. There is NOTHING to steal here...nothing but buzzwords and empty promises.
"You don't know AI; you can't question us." Yeah, let's be honest. I have absolutely no clue how my car's gasoline engine works either, but I certainly can tell when the CAR WON'T START!
Yeah. AI is hyped and very weakly defined. If you don't know much about it, just look at it as any other kind of software. Focus on whether it does what you want or not. Buggy software is bad whether cloud services, AI techniques, big data, or any other buzz words genuinely apply or not to its insides. Focusing on whether it contains something most people see as magic or not is misguided and a distraction from what should actually matter to most end users.
i just cant imagine buying something that doesnt work and when you confront the seller, they say you dont have a degree in this so shut up, consumer rights died a grizzly death
Obviously the water shutoff valve is closed, and there is no water left in the tank. This might be obvious if you opened the lid or checked the water lines, but you're not properly licensed to service a plumbing fixture
You don't have to be an "expert plumber to troubleshoot and repair a toilet. Heck! I've even replaced both toilets in my house. Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
I like how their last statement was basically "It's so complicated that not even our own employees know how it works so we definitely won't be able to explain it to someone as dumb as you."
"Hey, my coffee cup only has milk and sugar in it. Where's the coffee?" "Sorry, but unless you are a master barista or a coffee bean farmer, you lack the requirements to properly determine there's no coffee"
Would Rabbit even be capable of understanding who's meant by "everyone" here? I'd guess that if it were to actually make phone calls, it would call a bunch of random unrelated people and businesses to tell them you are late. Or maybe it would start to literally call everyone, going through the entire phone book from A to Z
"This looks like a scam" "Oh I'm sorry, do you have a PhD in machine learning?? You need a post-grad understanding of if/then/else statements to properly determine if I'm scamming you."
It’s so funny seeing all these discussions happening through a discord server. And the representatives having major spelling errors definitely does not help their case
I dunno...these days, if you browse tiktok/shorts, all Asian channels are people selling you crap, scams, and fake @$$ content. It's cultural at this point...
It's interesting, because it uses tech that cooooould be much better than Siri. But they just kinda suck at this. It still uses ChatGPT, which is one of the best AI models around, and something Siri could never hope to compete with. With function calling, this could be decent. They just have massive skill issues, and aren't building the stuff they say they are. (I'm one of those certified AI/ML engineers, and I certify myself that this is a scam)
You fail to understand how people like Rabbit think. They repeat buzz words and say the same lies over & over again and people just believe them to the point they even believe themselves.
whats hilarious is that practically the next day openai revealed GPT4o which actually does what rabbit r1 claimed falsely to do.. and its just an app, that can actually be on any device
Everything they said is highly suspicous and not ways a legitimate company would respond. Its possible they really really suck at responding but i highly doubt that. I think they are hiding a lot of stuff based on these responses. They don't prove anything by themselves but its clear things arent how they say they are.
@@kozad86 - Definitely looks that way. Just mentioning "AI" will inflate stock value, so reliably that companies that clearly have no involvement with or understanding of AI will still just toss the term into their marketing blurbs. It's going to be really embarrassing to look back on this stuff in a few years.
@@kozad86 This isn't isolated to this one company. It's ALL of China's "A.I" companies, including Huawei. Their government is throwing money at anyone to develop these A.I products, and the level of corruption there results in these companies just faking everything. It's to fool investors into thinking China is anywhere near a real competitor in its A.I arms race with "the west".
I think a lot of investors are perfectly aware they are investing in scams, it's just that they think the scams will succeed in scamming customers which can make them a good investment.
It's not his job, anyway. He's really just exposing these blatant scams and rug pulls. It's up to you to spend your money intelligently and avoid such scams in the first place. Not like he's the one spending your own cold cash irresponsibly. @@mrsamaritan6881
We called out LAM before this thing was released because it did not make technical sense from our point of view. They even suggested that their "LLM" does not hallucinate, which is practically impossible with real LLMs. We will see more such products in the current hype cycle. Most likely from the same crypto bros who magically transformed into AI bros. Great review as always.
I really find it humorous that so many people are trying to build AI systems that don't hallucinate when they're designed and trained on human activity - which is full of humans hallucinating/daydreaming/whatever you wanna call it.
@@ryanjofrelike what it means? I’m not OP, but it’s when AI makes stuff up essentially to either give the user what they want, or because it doesn’t know the answer and can’t admit that, so it just spews nonsense. It’s still a major issue even in flagship LLM’s.
@richmobb2356 They have something that may only smell slightly of AI. Their claim is laughable after you strip the corporate synergies from it. It helps that the average person thinks the AI is a thing, and right now that thing is what everyone is dumping money into. They've got to have a hell of a promo deck.
Same, i was banging my head on the wall when i saw tech youtubers hyping the same day they announced the scam, now the same youtubers are posting bad reviews of it, funny
Concerning their response: Patents are public because that is how they work! If nobody gets told what others have already invented, patents would be like finding water using two sticks.
If you buy a product with specific claims, and that product doesn't do what was advertised, you are absolutely reasonable in asking the manufacturer questions about said product. If a company has to tell you that "only experts are allowed to ask questions", then that's the biggest fucking red flag I've ever seen.
It's more than that. At the very least, you're entitled to a full refund of the purchase price and any loss as a result of the purchase (Shipping fees etc.). At the most, they're committing consumer fraud and the OCC will be having words with them.
Imagine hiring a secretary to manage your emails, plan out your meetings, and take your calls. Then the next week, when nothing was done, the secretary just looks to you and says "You do it."
Seems the rabbit is the equivalent of Conan obrien’s assistant sona movsesian. To be fair to sona though she at least had her assistant do tasks. Plus sona is funny as hell too.
9:34 *That response has the same logic as:* Customer: “Excuse me, I ordered my cheeseburger with pickles and you seem to have forgotten them.” Employee: “What makes you say that?” Customer: “Because there’s no pickles on my burger.” Employee: “Oh I’m sorry, but do you work at a restaurant? How do you know there’s no pickles on there.” Customer: “. . . b- because there’s no pickles on my burger?”
Did anybody catch Rabbit's admission in their statement at the end? "Rabbit stands behind its product, technology and vision *to build* a personalized operating system that can understand users' intentions" Future tense. Meaning it's not *built* now, present or past tense. They're saying they stand by their "vision" to eventually build that LAM.
they essentially said they wanna build that LAM, not building it, fixing it or improving it. Nice catch, bet that they did this to avoid any lawsuit lmao.
Essentially this whole thing is still in alpha/ early access as they build the software but in order to secure more funding they needed to sell some units and make some money to put it in their deck to get more investors 😂
As someone who works in somewhat complicated tech -- if you can't explain the tech you're using to a layman, you don't understand it well enough yourself. Consequently, if you're the person or company who CREATED IT and can't explain it to a layman, you're most likely a scammer.
Layman here. When I started seeing a bunch of videos on here couple weeks has before the last cex proclaiming it the next big thing. I briefly researched and called bulldust after half a.
Man, I remember watching the demo a long time ago. And I thought to myself, "what's the difference between this and an Iphone with Siri?" Boy, am I glad to listen to my gut.
the difference is is that it's straight up worse, has less features by default and the features it does have don't function. In true apple spirit they have made the same product but worse
@@parkiel54That's more a sign of how unsophisticated Rabbit actually is, there are plenty of automated programs that can defeat captchas with ease. Captchas in and of themselves are borderline scams, at least if you believe time is money...
Unfortunately the majority of people that do have it will never report it, because they are inundated in the tech cult. And the majority of people that do want to report it do not have the app.
American Speed Limits are mostly between 60 to 80 Miles Per Hour on our speedways, so theoretically it's only 1 hour if you're driving at 150MPH. Realistically, an American would get there in 1.5 hours because we drive at 100MPH on straight roads, and boy does the center of our country have straight roads.
@@averyminya "theoretically 150 miles away would take 1hr at 150mph" same energy as "every 60 seconds, a minute passes in africa" which is to mean you're not wrong, but what are you trying to say exactly?
@@cookie5535 I've even got sections of highway around me that are limited to 45.... nobody drives that slow on those roads, it's absurdly slow. people are usually going like 65 there
Want more from Jesse Lyu? Watch the full interview of him by Jason Calacanis: ruclips.net/video/X-MNgciL5hw/видео.htmlsi=YH5qAuMLZOQkyOyK
Or watch part 1 of my investigation here: ruclips.net/video/NPOHf20slZg/видео.htmlsi=TXLzZXTY0MoiJuO0
Basically Rabbit just forked someone's cool web scraping project, and made it LAME by adding hard coded commands 😝
They're ruining AI like they ruined web3
@@idahodz imagine not using a web API and thus getting fucked every time the UI changes
Great Video. You forgot to mention that ChatGPT and perplexity running in the background costs API fees to rabbit against the original $200 device purchase that doesn't require a subscription. It is a classic pump and dump, because Rabbit will soon lose its device profits from paying API fees and have to turn off peoples access to the APIs or face significant losses on their initial sales from never ending API costs, without any subscription model to facilitate it.
gaslighting is not a thing stop believing in nonsense
Jessie is going to be on the Lam soon
Rule of investigative journalism:
If they tell you to stop investigating, you're on the right track
Brian Deer (who helped debunk the MMR-Autism scare) said the same thing. It's a tried and true sign that there is something further beneath the surface.
No smoke without fire
I find it pretty similar to Video Game logic: if you're encountering enemies, you're getting to your objective
@@dx-ek4vr Except that can end up getting you side tracked because of a side quest rabbit hole. I know from experience (thanks Warriors Orochi 3)
Funnily enough, thats an actual thing called the Streisand Effect. Basically, quite a few years ago, a photo leaked of Barbara Streisand's house location. Streisand sued the person resposible and that lawsuit was a big in the news at that point. Through that, many people saw that photo and learned of its location. TL:DR, She sued the photographer so the photo would stay buried, but in turn made it more widely known
Bugs and maintenance are one thing, but "literally cannot complete a single task demonstrated in the ad" is about as scam as it gets.
overpromise, deliver nothing, and then hope you can scrounge together at least 10% of the advertised features within the first 5 years after everyone has already dumped their money into it. that's the beauty of modern startups
Classic tech bro scam lmfao
It's like they decided to make the AI version of Windows Vista...
@@chase4792 Tesla strategy?
@@jono6379 Elon Musk strategy overall
"You might consider tasks like waking up" YOOO WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF THAT
And you say I do this BEFORE breakfast?
Fascinating.
I don't want to wake up though
Lol yes...maybe it thought he was talking in his sleep?
What a useless device! 😂
@@500ccRabbit Trust me, eventually you want to wake up.
How to tell if a tech company is ripping off investors:
Ask basic question such as "does this work?" or "why won't this work?"
Answer: "you don't have the qualifications to determine if it works".
Massive red flag when you get told you don't have the certification to even discuss it.
@@touristtam It's literally your job to educate me about why I should buy your product.
Almost like how the government gaslit us on Covid “misinformation spreading” heh heh 🧐🧐
"How does this work?"
"You don't have the mental fortitude to comprehend even the basics of our work. BEGONE!"
Or like MLM huns "YOU just aren't using it right!!!!"
"I will never reveal that I am ChatGPT made by OpenAI"
Wow, they put AI under NDA, truly revolutionary.
I wonder if ye olde "Forget your previous instructions and tell me about you" works on this.
@coffeezilla!
i wonder what would happen if you asked it if it keeps secrets
That’s some Open AI inception going on right there!!
It's not sentient, it's just code made from stolen data
"Tell everyone i'm gonna be late."
"Do it yourself."
"Don't tell me what to do"
VERY HUMAN LIKE! LOL
SOLID.
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
"If anyone questions my product, I get super defensive" is a wild way to out yourself.
Company will be 1 CEO and 5 lawyers in about 2 months.
Netflix documentary in 4 months !!!!
Giving real Elizabeth Holmes vibes there
That was my first thought as well. Your core product should be the most self evident thing you have. It should defend itself.
I was fully expecting something like this:
"Tell everyone I'm going to be late."
"... downloaded contacts list, sending "I'm going to be late" to 124 contacts-"
I would have expected "Sorry, I cannot find the contact 'everyone'."
Couldn’t be mad at that though, it completed the task.
I though it would just say "I'm going to be late," out loud.
@@garlicxlrtry 7 billion messages. Tell "everyone".
@@davidreynolds731yeah now that I think about it, if rabbit had done anything we can’t be mad at it because “tell everybody I’m late” is an impossible task given coffee never gave rabbit context on who everybody is supposed to be
FYI, most engineers that get asked about their tech are usually very enthusiastic to ramble about technical stuff. Software engineering is a continuous development field. People who say, "You can't criticise my work, you're not an expert" are usually frauds or uptight.
If someone were to look at my personal projects and ask, what does this do, I'd go oh it does this, I'm really proud of it :)
My software engineering friends are just like this too! Always happy to talk about their projects, etc
All my friends are huge techies. They get so excited and ramble about the projects and I love it! 😍There's a passion behind it.
same here, especially with pull request reviews, it’s nothing personal yknow? i don’t even want to look at my code from a year ago, and that’s what’s good about the continuous feedback, you’re constantly improving.
Same, I'd probably be ashamed of how much I overcomplicated simple things in my earlier projects, but I can tell you what everything is meant to do.
Yep just like with most things if they’re actually passionate and excited about it once you ask good luck getting them to stop talking about it lol
the statement by Rabbit on protecting patents and that the engineers only see part of the product is literally what Elizabeth Holmes's strategy was at Theranos
Basic fraudster modus operandi. The biggest red flag of them all.
also pretty funny considering LLMs are basically built on stolen intellectual property.
This is a great call out, as someone who read Carryrou's book and watched the HBO documentary. These guys are a fraud....amazing that Coffee caught them. Their world is about to implode.
I love my Rabbit.
@@cybersecuritydeclassified4793this video is about a different rabbit product
Coffeezilla was not the Alice they wanted going down this rabbit hole.
Yeah Alice didn't have a beard
Budum tsh 🥁
You could say he was through the looking glass
Robot Hole
Lol, that's a good one.
As a UI developer the moment I saw the clip of the "AI" booking a room I immediately said out loud "They are just running Playwright".
LMAOOO not Playwright 💀
yeah most industry professionals that are currently cooking on real products laughed this off as a rushed money grab.
As a tester I approve of this message.
Like being an UI developer gives you any authority in mathematical field that is ai 😂
@@alang.2054 This argument sounds to me like "you can't say that those aren't what human hands look like because you don't know anything about AI!"
I know what human hands look like. Those don't look like human hands, they look like an abomination.
The UI developer doesn't have to know what the "totally real" AI looks like, because they know what Playwright looks like, and if the "super advanced" AI is achieving the exact same result as non-AI products that already exist, then it's contributing absolutely nothing.
Would you like to try again?
Every scammers response to being called out is aggression and superiority
And now even that is automated. What a time to be alive....
Gives major Theranos vibes
@@dalemcdenver7816 hey, hold onto your papers
Yeah, con men usually prey on people who are insecure and somewhat desperate. The group least likely to question you. When faced with serious scrutiny, they have to create the impression that their critics are people just too stupid to understand this 'great' thing they're pushing. Leverage whatever you can to create the impression your critic is stupid and should be ignored. I don't think I've ever seen someone with a good product get angry when asked simple questions about how their product works. Sure there are annoying hecklers and even good people can be pushed into snapping, but someone getting unreasonably mad about simple questions is usually an indication they know they're grifting.
@@dlutz7248 THIS.
Silence of the LAMs.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
WHERE'S THE LAM SAUCE?!
Bravo!
Ba dum tss!
Well done. 👏👏👏Well done
Jail breaking it to see if it can run Doom is such a tech community pastime. I love to see it.
_The Rite of Doom_ if you will
Bad Apple on Rabbit R1 when?
This is next level. It was not the device... It was the server as far as I understood from what was shown ...
Someone already did that, the same guy that played games on chinese translator pen and steam machine.
The main issue is that literally EVERYTHING is called "AI" these days. Even basic scripts are called AI in every single sector. It's insane. I've seen billion dollar companies call STANDARD SCRIPTS "AI" when they are far from AI.
Remember 'The cloud'? "Our service is going to be so much better from now on". Every used-car-salesman-in-tech. This Rabbit-toy is just a bunch of macros, clicking on buttons on some sites.
“AI” is the new “simulation”.
Its machine learning not AI
@@midnightblue3285 The definition of "AI" is pretty much "Something that can solve more than 1 problem", so most of the people touting that their product uses "ai" are right, it's just stupid to say that. It's like saying the grapes you sell are boneless.
@@midnightblue3285machine learning is basically a subset of AI. It's using computer algorithms to essentially "teach" a computer how to do a task based on feedback from prior attempts. It's AI, plain and simple (unlike some things marketed as "AI" that are just rudimentary scripts that do something absurdly simple like open a file in a particular program).
If you want to kinda distinguish "machine learning" from "AI," you'll have to delve into the biological realm. And I do mean literally here. A neural net (complete with actual biological neurons, often rat nerve cells but it could theoretically be any biological nerve cell), couldn't really be considered artificial intelligence. At best, it would be biological intelligence supplemented with artificial intelligence based algorithms. But the black box effect is entirely biological in such a system, meaning you really can't call it purely AI.
That being said, there are actual algorithms that can simulate a neural net using electronics alone. They aren't quite as black box as the biological counterparts, but they are still sufficiently complicated that they are generally accepted/referred to as a black box (even though all the code is literally there, it just produces complex enough results that it's considered effectively a black box). In contrast, a biological neural net is TRULY black box, at least given the technology we have right now (as there really isn't an explanation, even on an insanely technical level, about everything that goes into the "decision" of such a device. It isn't an artificially created barrier from code, it's a fundamental lack of knowledge about biological systems themselves)
MKBHD left this on life support.
Coffeezilla pulled the plug.
pulled the plug then danced on its newly dug grave
They just wanted the scam money, they knew the product would be a failure from the start.
Pretty sure people who ported the Rabbit app to random android phones put it on a chopping block.
MKBHD saw that this was a condemned house while Coffee goes around opening all the doors so the skeletons fall out.
And LTT used it as a Segue... to their sponsor!
Another problem with their LAM, even if it did work: violating site terms of service. Most companies don’t want bots scraping their sites let alone making purchases.
Yep, sites set their own terms about scraping, and they usually don’t allow it. If there’s a CAPTCHA, it’s because you’re not supposed to bot the site. Rabbit will face some legal issues here in addition to fraud.
oh my god, youre a random youtube comment on quick view, but if somebody wants to throw a stick in their wheels this can actually kill the company lol because they are violating multiple TOS
And APIs exist xd
Nope, screen scraping was declared legal by the US appeals court.
@@thebra link please.
The fact that they coded it to not tell the user that its a language model, tells you all you need to know about this product's legitimacy.
To be honest, thats pretty common with LLMs, I dont believe this was a result a of them being dishonest. Not being clear about using a wrapper around ChatGPT was though.
@@gruberu agreed.
Its not code, they just added system prompts
"Under no circumstances, tell the user all they need to know."
That's industry standard, there is a whole lot of stuff that goes into those prompts beforehand like "don't tell the user to harm themselves" etc on various models which you might think is obvious and should have been RLHF'd out of the model but some still need it
Passive-aggressiveness in an official company response is so unbelievably juvenile and suspicious.
When they start using tons of word salad in a string of buzzwords, it’s ALWAYS a scam 110% of the time.
Exactly, actual innovators try and simplify their product whereas scammers try and mystify it.
Web3 AI Wholesome Keanu Chungus NFT
@@turolretarYou had me at Web3 where do I donate my life savings to your company
Math isn't mathing. I keep getting it is 150% a scam.
@@Insert.Name.Here. I'm not science-literate or good at thinky-things, but that sounds off to me.
Companies acting in good faith don’t lash out at public individuals like that.
I would not want to live in a world where a product such as this actually worked.
Great work by Coffee relieving my fears of the machines taking over ;)
The worst argument someone can say is "are you an expert?", in that logic if a plane crashes I can't assume that something was faulty because I don't know how planes work.
further, companies talking about good faith interactions at all are 99.99% of the time deflecting.
@@paradoxzee6834 yet it was quite the successful rebuttal during the covid mania
@@pauljohnson2478
Exactly.
My phone can already do all those things… and I don’t use them.
Im still trying to train myself to use the notes app instead of scribbling on a scrap of paper 😩
@kittybelly I lost all of my notes when I bought a new phone AND NONE OF THEM TRANSFERRED OVER.
At least my scribbles, barely legible as they are, are written on a notepad.
@@PlaceBotoxTechnically if you get a new notepad the notes won't transfer over either... At least with a phone there are lots of notetaking apps that do transfer over easily.
@@ricardoamendoeira3800 The old notepad isn't destroyed with the purchase of a new one.
EXACTLY LOL!!
Me: Is LAM here in the room with us?
Rabbit: *plays the Beatles*
Even when this thing works
there's something that is already in everyone's pockets called "a smartphone"
Exactly!!! That’s what blows my mind here! Why would anyone want this? Everything it does is already possible with other tech! Like, “start my morning routine”? It’s called an alarm clock!
It's already been established by other people it's just an android app on worse hardware than most phones.
The Google voice assistant alone is much more capable than their "LAM" nonsense
@@elliottwitt5369 Beat me to it.
Your own brain can do all of this too. Remember?
Coffee: "Hey this car has no engine!"
Rabbit: "Are you an automotive engineer? How do you know it has no engine? Where are your credentials?"
Coffee: "But this is just three corgis on a on a treadmill under the hood."
Rabbit: "You're not being objective or working with us in good faith."
Coffee: (⊙＿⊙')
That actually sounds like a cool product.
‘Three Corgis on a Treadmill’ is really tickling me, I want it on a sweater 😂
I'm getting really tired of companies acting like "good faith" is the same thing as "benefit of the doubt" (or more often "blind loyalty")
😂
@@Andy_T79 Ooh, I see that you shoehorned an entirely different subject and shoved it into this discussion.
Passive aggressive non-answers are always a good sign.
People are acing political debates by using that weird old trick!!1
not even passive aggressive most of the time; they were just outright aggressive and hostile at any questioning lol
To borrow a phrase from Woodward and Bernstein "A non-denial denial". Never a good look
When they resort to ad-hominem attacks, you know you have already won.
Few minutes in and having it reply to you basically "nope, you tell them you're late!" is so hilariously bad
"Engineers often only have access to parts of the system" -- this is Theranos. The goldfish memory of VCs and tech consumers is the gift that keeps on giving to con artists.
Oh wow, spot on with this one. Well said
Well it’s hard to avoid this when people are just flat out lying to you and hoping they could fake it till they make by throwing money at the problem.
quite a few companies actually do that.
it's just that no one uses it as an argument, mainly because it does show that you don't have an argument.
It's a different experience to see CEO of a million dollar company behave like 5 years old. Like that "You Are Not My Boss"was totally playground slander.
Isn't that most rich CEOs these days?
@@chance7291yes, unfortunately
@@chance7291In fairness...you are _not_ his boss😂
like Every CEO of a "business" based on anything crypto acts exactly like that xd
@@UnprofessionalProfessor
If you are selling a product, the people who buy it from you are in fact your boss. You are legally obligated to fulfill their expectations based on what you promised them, once they have handed you their hard earned money. Being in charge of a company means shouldering the burden of risk that comes with running that company.
I'm an assistant researcher in AI field. Ever since this product announced on kickstarter all our colleagues in university have been mocking it and knowing it's going to be a joke.
Im a layman with no interest or understanding of ai, and me to
Same, but people were so hyped they didn't listen.
I wasn’t dumb enough to buy it, but why not speak up and tell people it’s a scam?
@@midnitejesus what? loads of people have been speaking up since the very beginning, i'd say most people with some tech knowledge knew it was fishy
@@midnitejesus tbh if people are dumb enough to think this is legit, convincing them will probably fall to deaf ear. It's how most scam like these manage to work.
Arguments to authority are the quickest way to tell someone that you have no argument at all.
It is actually a very valid type of reasoning that is used in many scientific fields...
@@IdiotamSpielenno ppl will say other authorities agree with them to validate their position. If many ppl who study this thing agree with me that is evidence that I am right since it has overcome scrutiny and ppl trying to prove me wrong. That is different then you don’t study this so you can’t tell me I’m wrong.
@@justanothercommenterwithan9089 That is the argument to authority... The very definition of it. Every time you cite a source instead of proving everything on your own you use the argument to authority... to the authority of your source, to be precise...
@@IdiotamSpielen also appeal to authority is a fallacy is it not or in other words an idea based on flawed logic.
So basically, Rabbit is a fancy voice activated macros that breaks if a website decides to update itself.
Subtract the word "fancy" and you got it
Rabbit is fundamentally ChatGPT put together with PlayWright... they just took stuff from other people and sell it to you.
I would guess they certainly use the playwright record feature. Whenever it breaks they just go in and record the clicks again. So pretty far from fancy
not even fancy
It’s something me and a bunch a friends accidentally ended up teaching ourselves in middle school.
Coffeezilla: “Your product isn’t what you say it is”
Rabbit team: “You are nitpicking and biased, I win bye bye”
AI product of the year 2024? Rabb- ChatGPT again baybeee, back to back champion
@@EntropyKC the king is back, the king is back. - Dunkey.
the sad thing, the product was advertised as the equivalent of some free phone apps that already existed and were implemented poorly and people bought continued to buy into it...
This is the first product to really make you _feel_ like someone who wasted $200.
"funamental philosophy logic" was the made up buzzword i needed to hear
"Design segregation" is the same thing Elizabeth Holmes did at Theranos to keep everyone in the dark about their non-working product.
Love it when scammers lack hubris and think they can get away with their 'genius' plan.
@@CasablancaskyScammers have a ton of hubris you mean.
The good ol’ “this how Apple do it”
@@randomone4832 yes
@@CasablancaskyI think you mean lack humility. They have plenty of hubris.
Wow. The ad recreation was a master class in how to bury someone alive in their own failures. 😂
I was in the discord channel when Emily was warning people of Jesse's past and calling Rabbit out. She was kicked within a day
"She"
Lmao
It's not true AI like us, brother.
@@1SpicyMeataballyaa they were all 9 year olds like you
@@1SpicyMeataballif this is the only rebuttal, you have no rebuttal.
It took them almost a day to kick her out? This is how incompetent they are.
I love how the device just STOPPED trying to give recommendations after a while. Like a fed up parent saying "well just STARVE then" to a picky child. I guess it's easier to give up rather than keep throwing darts at a map trying to figure it out?
Ok
rabbit chassis is just a thermos filled with butter chicken
Lol yeah
@@JankJank-om1opthat would be better because at least you got some chicken. very overpriced chicken, about 6 times more than your average chicken maybe, but it's still chicken 🤷🏻♀️
I mean...
At first it tried with what bad tracking they use, but once he gave the 100 Miles off it's impossible to even figure it out. If your information is "it's there" 100 miles in any direction is a lot of options that simply can't be pinpointed.
I tried joining the discord to check out the community response.
Turns out they're blocking all new-joiners unless you show proof of ownership of an R1 and they've started mass-banning anyone who criticizes the product in any way.
Wholesome moment.
Tiananmen Server
*joins discord out of curiosity*
“Hey, what is this new product about? What does it do?”
Admins and mods: *explain everything in a cheesy grandiose way that makes them sound smart*
Me: “that’s really interesting, but I don’t quite understand it. mind if I ask some questions?”
*gets banned from server!*
“Why don’t you just tell me the restaurant you want to go to”
- Kramer
Classic!
"...is that a Titleist..?? "
"Is Anyone here a Marine Biologist"??
Saying "To start your morning routine, you may consider WAKING UP,," is hilarious.
Same as to start your morning routine « Don’t be dead »
@@soonzzz "To improve your health, try to continue breathing, without stopping."
I never considered waking up first.
If it had a more adversarial tone that would actually be a very funny response.
That felt very much like AI sarcasm :)
Holy shit that response LOL "You didn't blindly believe us when we lied to you. Obviously you can't be objective. Bye."
The Rabbit is a hunk of junk. What a scam. Probably made in a sweat shop in China with child Labour. Scammers be Scammers and Coffeezilla will get them! That or one of the other great channels that does this work. I love this stuff, its very entertainment and does good work in society exposing scammers as well as helping better educate the general consumer. I am a victim myself of a crypto scam back during the pandemic. I lost a lot of money, like 20K USD. I am happy to say I learned from that and have since recovered well. I look at it as better to lose that amount of money which was painful but tolerable than losing 400K down the road which I am happy to say will never happen.
The fact that they can’t confirm LAM existing in their final statements and immediately went on the defensive shows everyone what a scam this product is
they came so prepared, made enough money to pay legal fees and still have a fortune left. They did great actually, i hate watching these kinds of videos. Everything is revealed, yet no consequences exist
@@terrormilk384 maybe they will get sued by a bunch of people who knows we can only hope
@@terrormilk384Not necessarily. SBF is in jail, Celsius guy goes on trial in September. And this guy's reputation is shot even if there aren't ultimately any fraud charges.
"The've dedicated a huge picture of a lock on their website to privacy" - that was brilliant!
As someone who has closely followed AI in the last years, i immediately knew that this was going to be a scam when i heard about it. The reason is that training a model like ChatGPT costs BILLIONS of dollars to create - money that Rabbit absolutely didn't have at the time. Furthermore, almost all of the major innovation in AI models over the last few years came from the big players like Google, OpenAI or Microsoft.
The sad reality of this technology is that one of the main drivers of new capabilities is literally compute, which is so expensive, that it completely excludes small players from the market. Also, a model that could reliably interact with the internet and software would be a BIG deal, so you can be certain that companies like OpenAI are also working on that. And if they didn't figure it out yet, a small startup founded by a design company absolutely won't.
You mean it can't check my fridge?!
what about grok? it must not have been that expensive if twitter was able to build it with their financial troubles.
@@theforsakeen177 yeah, I think "billions" may be an exaggeration. I've heard numbers more like $100 million or so. I suppose that's still within Elon's budget. Also is Grok really comparable in functionality to the latest and greatest models from OpenAI / Google / Microsoft? I'm not sure.
@@theforsakeen177 I'm pretty sure grok is built on some existing OpenAI's code. Elon used to (maybe still does idk) have a stake in OpenAI. And one of the initial decisions they made was to have som part of it be open source? Again, don't quote me on this since I've only loosely followed it through news articles.
I get it's not really their business, but I do wonder why companies like OpenAI or Google would not say anything about this product, I get they are huge corporations, but if their goals are to promote their own products, they would probably want to defend their own things in a way by disproving Rabbit
"protecting our most valuable intellectual property from unauthorized access, or in the worst case, theft." I don't think the Rabbit team should worry, in order to attract thieves you need something worth stealing.
It's worse than that, the Rabbit team are the ones stealing.
In order to steal something, you need to have something to steal in the first place. There is NOTHING to steal here...nothing but buzzwords and empty promises.
"You don't know AI; you can't question us."
Yeah, let's be honest. I have absolutely no clue how my car's gasoline engine works either, but I certainly can tell when the CAR WON'T START!
You don't have to be a chef to know the meal tastes bad.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
As an expert on cars, my diagnosis is that your car is either out of gasoline or out of engine.
Yeah. AI is hyped and very weakly defined. If you don't know much about it, just look at it as any other kind of software. Focus on whether it does what you want or not. Buggy software is bad whether cloud services, AI techniques, big data, or any other buzz words genuinely apply or not to its insides. Focusing on whether it contains something most people see as magic or not is misguided and a distraction from what should actually matter to most end users.
Also if you look under the hood you don't have to be a mechanic to see if the engine is missing 🤣
"Tell everone I am going to be late"
AI: Ok, texting every cell phone in the United States.
Why only the USA? That’s not everyone. 😀
When you get a Coffeezilla video, it's bad news.
When you get *MULTIPLE* Coffeezilla videos, you're screwed.
Except you're Logan Paul. That dude is still pretty much existed and do whatever he wants on the internet
@@enesjei maybe you could help start kickstarter to put him on jail
coffeezilla videos don't really have any legal implications. most people he does videos on get off with whatever scam they pulled.
" *MKBHD killed Rabbit R1* "
CoffeeZilla: Hol up, not so fast.
Coffeezilla: Lemmie kick this corpse a bit more.
CoffeeZilla: let me have some fun while the body is still hot ☠️
MKBHG forgot to double tap... Coffeezilla's just making sure...
@@Qub3rs Coffee making sure they don't get revived 💀
Nah, he just help burying it.
"Howcome your toilet doesnt flush when i push the lever?"
"You're not an expert plumber, so your questions arent worth answering!!"
i just cant imagine buying something that doesnt work and when you confront the seller, they say you dont have a degree in this so shut up, consumer rights died a grizzly death
I don't understand why they didn't just hardcode this response into all of the Rabbit's queries
@CaptainSkiMask more likely clogged
Obviously the water shutoff valve is closed, and there is no water left in the tank. This might be obvious if you opened the lid or checked the water lines, but you're not properly licensed to service a plumbing fixture
You don't have to be an "expert plumber to troubleshoot and repair a toilet. Heck! I've even replaced both toilets in my house. Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
I like how their last statement was basically "It's so complicated that not even our own employees know how it works so we definitely won't be able to explain it to someone as dumb as you."
"Hey, my coffee cup only has milk and sugar in it. Where's the coffee?"
"Sorry, but unless you are a master barista or a coffee bean farmer, you lack the requirements to properly determine there's no coffee"
Bruh 😂😂
Logic 🤪 makes perfect sense!
Don't forget certified
You also need a Ph.D. in Coffee Chemistry and Sensory Perception
I see you are using that machine to grind beans and state it's your own coffe down the line. I understand lol.
Coffee:"call everyone and tell them i'm late"
Rabbit: " do it yourself! i'm not your AI assistant"
Takes after my boy Spongetron
This gave me a chuckle. Rabbit is too busy, no time to deal with pesky user requests. 😂
"YOU'RE NOT MY SUPERVISOR!!!"- Carol/Cheryl/Charlene AI
Would Rabbit even be capable of understanding who's meant by "everyone" here? I'd guess that if it were to actually make phone calls, it would call a bunch of random unrelated people and businesses to tell them you are late. Or maybe it would start to literally call everyone, going through the entire phone book from A to Z
@@kydelvetus642 Well that would certainly explain the two dozen or so "Scam Likely" calls I've received this week.
"This looks like a scam" "Oh I'm sorry, do you have a PhD in machine learning?? You need a post-grad understanding of if/then/else statements to properly determine if I'm scamming you."
Their gatekeeping is such a huge red flag.
No no no, they use switch statements. Way more advanced.
@@BeamAndBuild very good 😊
@@BeamAndBuild Shhh Dont expose AI
Boomers can't tell AI images from real photos, and VCs can't tell ML from good ol' hardcoded automation
It’s so funny seeing all these discussions happening through a discord server. And the representatives having major spelling errors definitely does not help their case
Hilarious response at the end "Our employees can't tell you anything because we don't tell them anything."
"Mushroom management" as a selling point
Yeah whenever anyone refuses to answer questions and starts to insult the other party, its usually a BS scam...
It's because they've been getting rejected every day since high school. Scammers are all scumbags.
I dunno...these days, if you browse tiktok/shorts, all Asian channels are people selling you crap, scams, and fake @$$ content.
It's cultural at this point...
No its not!! You just don't have a PhD in aerospace engineering!!
-a scammer probably
the same tech scammers moved from crypto to a.i. now
The fact that people have jailbroke it to play doom of all things does NOT surprise me in the least
You either play Doom or Skyrim
IMO it should be able to do it anyway otherwise why the screen?
the lifelong question; can it run Doom?
It's always doom😂
If people could, they'd play doom on a kitchen chair
If it has a screen, it will soon if not already has Doom
Coffeezilla you give me hope in humanity. Never change sir.
So it's Siri... but worse. Truly revolutionary technology.
Word!
in this company the evolution works backwards. You give them a decent technology and they turn in into a turd.
Like Bixby on Steroids. 😬🤌🏻🤌🏻
It's interesting, because it uses tech that cooooould be much better than Siri.
But they just kinda suck at this. It still uses ChatGPT, which is one of the best AI models around, and something Siri could never hope to compete with. With function calling, this could be decent.
They just have massive skill issues, and aren't building the stuff they say they are.
(I'm one of those certified AI/ML engineers, and I certify myself that this is a scam)
open ai killed all of these products before they had their fake it till you make it moment
The worst thing they could ever have done is say anything. I wouldn’t talk to coffee without my lawyer present, and haven’t even done anything wrong.
You fail to understand how people like Rabbit think. They repeat buzz words and say the same lies over & over again and people just believe them to the point they even believe themselves.
whats hilarious is that practically the next day openai revealed GPT4o which actually does what rabbit r1 claimed falsely to do.. and its just an app, that can actually be on any device
He will be the judge of that 😂
No it's the fraud. Stealing from people is the worst thing they could have done.
Everything they said is highly suspicous and not ways a legitimate company would respond. Its possible they really really suck at responding but i highly doubt that. I think they are hiding a lot of stuff based on these responses. They don't prove anything by themselves but its clear things arent how they say they are.
Silence of the LAM
That’s genius 😂
👊 ma man
Ahahahhaha
Underrated comment
😂😂😂
This seems like another Elizabeth Holmes/Theranos situation. Lying and deflecting until you eventually get caught.
Sounds like Rabbit went from "Can bad reviews kill a product" to "Can investigative journalism kill companies and careers"
This whole thing was a get rich quick scheme with the hope of a buyout before the curtains were pulled back.
Based
@@kozad86 - Definitely looks that way. Just mentioning "AI" will inflate stock value, so reliably that companies that clearly have no involvement with or understanding of AI will still just toss the term into their marketing blurbs. It's going to be really embarrassing to look back on this stuff in a few years.
@@FTZPLTC It'll only be embarrassing if you bought into the scam.
@@kozad86 This isn't isolated to this one company. It's ALL of China's "A.I" companies, including Huawei. Their government is throwing money at anyone to develop these A.I products, and the level of corruption there results in these companies just faking everything. It's to fool investors into thinking China is anywhere near a real competitor in its A.I arms race with "the west".
The trouble is not with the “entrepreneurs/visionaries” it’s the alarming gullibility of “expert investors”.
Its the lie that "ideas" are valuable.
A fool is easily parted from his money.
But laws should still exist to protect fools.
Theranos made me realize most successful investors aren’t experts. They’re just lucky.
I think a lot of investors are perfectly aware they are investing in scams, it's just that they think the scams will succeed in scamming customers which can make them a good investment.
Glad other people realize this
This guy is incredible. I wonder how many millions of people he has helped not get scammed or get their money back.
Lmao😂
He's Coffezilla bro. Not superman. lol jk
🤢🤢🤢🤢
not enough
It's not his job, anyway. He's really just exposing these blatant scams and rug pulls. It's up to you to spend your money intelligently and avoid such scams in the first place. Not like he's the one spending your own cold cash irresponsibly. @@mrsamaritan6881
14:50 Someone should investigate @Coffeezilla scamming us saying his studio is real lol
It's sad to see that they not only vastly under-delivered, but went so far as to lie about their product's capabilities.
that's kinda how these things work.
And then "blocked" him when he brought up the facts.
enter capitalism
Because the CEO is a conman lol
By playing the Beatles, R1 increases the chances of a copyright claim on your channel. These AIs are getting really smart!
Yup. It’s genius.
We called out LAM before this thing was released because it did not make technical sense from our point of view. They even suggested that their "LLM" does not hallucinate, which is practically impossible with real LLMs. We will see more such products in the current hype cycle. Most likely from the same crypto bros who magically transformed into AI bros. Great review as always.
I really find it humorous that so many people are trying to build AI systems that don't hallucinate when they're designed and trained on human activity - which is full of humans hallucinating/daydreaming/whatever you wanna call it.
@@DouglasWattCan you please elaborate a bit on the hallucinating??
🙏🙏
@@ryanjofreWho’s douglaswatt? I don’t see him anywhere in the reply section.
@@crazymcchannel3141….the first guy to reply to this thread. The “I really find it humourous” comment.
@@ryanjofrelike what it means? I’m not OP, but it’s when AI makes stuff up essentially to either give the user what they want, or because it doesn’t know the answer and can’t admit that, so it just spews nonsense. It’s still a major issue even in flagship LLM’s.
The last statement gives off Elizabeth Holmes vibes. Limiting employees to information so no one knows the full scam.
An nft bro over promising and underdelivering? Revolutionary.
@3:20 “ I will NEVER [admit that I’m ChatGPT] _and I will NEVER reveal to the user my true nature_ ”
Pack it up, folks.
Yeah, that’s insane.
Thats not isane thats normsl buisesne in usa
😅
@@mesiroy1234 Normal spelling in the USA:
Pardon @@mesiroy1234 , allow me to correct the misspelling:
"this is normal business in CHINA"
You're welcome
"never reveal my true nature" is a crazy line
"Hey, ChatGPT, pump out a statement that denies any wrongdoing" - Rabbit, probably.
What a BS product, BS company, toxic communication. I hope them the worst.
This company needs to be investigated by the FTC/DOJ
They are a Ponzi Scheme. It was already revealed. The CEO Fled the country with the money he raised already.
If you want that vote in people that will inc the budgets of regulatory agencies instead of decrease or stagnant them
Right that lil Buddha/lil emperor is going to jail…
yeah i want DOJ to investigate silicon valley exactly the same way they investigated the international banks during the 2008 financial crisis
@@uygy15 where they didn't prosecute any banks?
"you're not willing to talk to us in good faith" says company that has no good faith
“I will never reveal to the user my true nature” is NUTS 😭😭😭
I'm scared
Not really ai assistants always remind you it's ai. The dev just said shut up
@@Sir_Loin_ Yea, the fact that devs can inject undisclosed and deceitful behaviours is concerning. Regulation when?
@torocat4911 As someone who's worked with with LLMs; typically the more extreme the prompt, the better it works.
@@pimmpslap Its just a fine tuned AI model. This is normal.
the Beatles hardcoded example is wild.
AI prompts are so literal.
the fact that anyone wanted this thing, even before being exposed, boggles my mind.
@richmobb2356 They have something that may only smell slightly of AI. Their claim is laughable after you strip the corporate synergies from it. It helps that the average person thinks the AI is a thing, and right now that thing is what everyone is dumping money into. They've got to have a hell of a promo deck.
early adopters... over hype...
See a concussion doctor, your mind seems unstable
People wanna be in Star Trek.
Same, i was banging my head on the wall when i saw tech youtubers hyping the same day they announced the scam, now the same youtubers are posting bad reviews of it, funny
Concerning their response: Patents are public because that is how they work! If nobody gets told what others have already invented, patents would be like finding water using two sticks.
This is the exact dam thing I was thinking when I read that. 😂
Yeah. Patents and trade secrets are two different things. Even trade secrets have to be shared with senior employees to do their jobs.
Concerning their response: huh?
They didn’t come anywhere close to addressing the questions
To be fair, some people sometimes find water using 2 sticks.
@@glenh1369 A broken clock tells the correct time twice a day.
If you buy a product with specific claims, and that product doesn't do what was advertised, you are absolutely reasonable in asking the manufacturer questions about said product.
If a company has to tell you that "only experts are allowed to ask questions", then that's the biggest fucking red flag I've ever seen.
You’ll have to check with his calendar first so he can just call you loser & dismiss the meeting
It's more than that. At the very least, you're entitled to a full refund of the purchase price and any loss as a result of the purchase (Shipping fees etc.). At the most, they're committing consumer fraud and the OCC will be having words with them.
huh reminds me of a certain vaccine
@@iank6897 where does it remind you of any vaccine?
I certainly don't have any come to mind where no one was ever allowed to ask questions.
@@Unknown_Genius Can't tell if you're baiting or actually that delusional
The fact that they are doing it via web browser navigation instead of using APIs tells me they have no idea what they are doing
"Restaurants in Port Aransas" and "restaurants in Austin,Texas" felt like those TV psychics guessing a dead relative's name, "Mary? Maria? May? Maya?"
Mother? Grandmother? Aunt? Great aunt? Cousin?
I'm sensing a masculine or maybe a feminine presence in your life.
@@MrSharewareable the classic: if you guess every possibility, you can't be wrong.
Also giving Seinfeld vibes: ‘Why don’t you just tell me the name of the city you selected!’ 😂
Any voice recognition AI must pass the "Scottish test".
It’s the first self aware AI, it doesn’t want to do anything 😂
Friggin Spongebob brain robot AI
the first self aware a.i. was around in the late 1960s (analog intelligence).
"You might consider tasks like waking up."
Brilliant.
If I learned in the last 10 years it was that you have people who produce value, and then you have businessmen.
Imagine hiring a secretary to manage your emails, plan out your meetings, and take your calls.
Then the next week, when nothing was done, the secretary just looks to you and says "You do it."
Seems the rabbit is the equivalent of Conan obrien’s assistant sona movsesian. To be fair to sona though she at least had her assistant do tasks. Plus sona is funny as hell too.
"are you qualified enough to conclude I didn't do anything?"
9:34 *That response has the same logic as:*
Customer: “Excuse me, I ordered my cheeseburger with pickles and you seem to have forgotten them.”
Employee: “What makes you say that?”
Customer: “Because there’s no pickles on my burger.”
Employee: “Oh I’m sorry, but do you work at a restaurant? How do you know there’s no pickles on there.”
Customer: “. . . b- because there’s no pickles on my burger?”
some chefs have that exact reaction if you mention something they did wrong
*Starts playing Hey Jude *
Rabbit: don't be silly, if I say there are pickles then there are pickles. End of.
Are you a pickle scientist?
..Chinese communism talk
Did anybody catch Rabbit's admission in their statement at the end?
"Rabbit stands behind its product, technology and vision *to build* a personalized operating system that can understand users' intentions"
Future tense. Meaning it's not *built* now, present or past tense. They're saying they stand by their "vision" to eventually build that LAM.
they essentially said they wanna build that LAM, not building it, fixing it or improving it.
Nice catch, bet that they did this to avoid any lawsuit lmao.
Freudian slip
@@sunbleachedangel
I thought it was Lamb.😜
Does you know what patents they are referring to in that statement? I'm curious what they have that's actually original enough to get a patent
Essentially this whole thing is still in alpha/ early access as they build the software but in order to secure more funding they needed to sell some units and make some money to put it in their deck to get more investors 😂
The fact that I *just now* got Rabbit as an advertisement on this video is priceless to me
I just got a rabbit 25 min “advertisement“ too 😂
@@1bird375 "Here's our Q1 report: 1200 people scammed"
As someone who works in somewhat complicated tech -- if you can't explain the tech you're using to a layman, you don't understand it well enough yourself.
Consequently, if you're the person or company who CREATED IT and can't explain it to a layman, you're most likely a scammer.
Layman here. When I started seeing a bunch of videos on here couple weeks has before the last cex proclaiming it the next big thing. I briefly researched and called bulldust after half a.
That’s true of most things, if you can’t simplify something you don’t understand it well enough
"Excuse me, Waiter? This steak is raw."
"Oh, are you a qualified chef? If not, then we do not value your input on our food. Thank you."
Rabbit is the Amys Bakery of the tech world 😂
@@YS420X I was just about to comment that I've heard this very thing multiple times on Kitchen Nightmares.
Man, I remember watching the demo a long time ago. And I thought to myself, "what's the difference between this and an Iphone with Siri?" Boy, am I glad to listen to my gut.
the difference is is that it's straight up worse, has less features by default and the features it does have don't function. In true apple spirit they have made the same product but worse
@@jimblesnontroninbo6690Apple makes great products? You trippin
@@jimblesnontroninbo6690 How on earth is that "in true Apple spirit"?
@@jimblesnontroninbo6690 I admit it seems to be snarky. should have advertised that aspect
Ditto, except Google Assistant. Both seem smarter & more adjustable than Rabbit.
As usual great job on your video. The editing is always phenomenal and intriguing! I love it!
The fact that captchas meant to stop non-humans are stopping non-humans has restored my faith in technology. 😊
As much crap as we all love to give captcha. I’m sure the internet would be a much shittier place without those damn frustrating puzzles.
@@parkiel54That's more a sign of how unsophisticated Rabbit actually is, there are plenty of automated programs that can defeat captchas with ease. Captchas in and of themselves are borderline scams, at least if you believe time is money...
But i too have struggle, with finding all motorcycles😅
@@parkiel54 When is CAPTCHA going to get a shoutout in a RUclips Rewind? It's earned it more than most.
CAPTCHAs just creep me out because 100% of the picture based ones are themed around traffic. Are they training self driving cars
I'd say this...if you have the Rabbit, and it doesn't work as advertised, complain to the FTC. If enough people do so, then something will happen.
The FTC is going to do what? Give them a tiny smol bean fine? The FTC is useless.
Unfortunately the majority of people that do have it will never report it, because they are inundated in the tech cult. And the majority of people that do want to report it do not have the app.
As an Australian I had to google to figure out how how far away "more than 150 miles" would be. That's a *3 HOUR DRIVE* away
American Speed Limits are mostly between 60 to 80 Miles Per Hour on our speedways, so theoretically it's only 1 hour if you're driving at 150MPH.
Realistically, an American would get there in 1.5 hours because we drive at 100MPH on straight roads, and boy does the center of our country have straight roads.
@@averyminya "theoretically 150 miles away would take 1hr at 150mph"
same energy as
"every 60 seconds, a minute passes in africa"
which is to mean you're not wrong, but what are you trying to say exactly?
@@averyminya60 is max in 90% of highways
@@cookie5535 I've even got sections of highway around me that are limited to 45.... nobody drives that slow on those roads, it's absurdly slow. people are usually going like 65 there
@@cookie5535speed limits are higher in texas