ECG Rhythms for self-assessment: Test ECG Interpretation Skills

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2018
  • An excellent video to test your ECG Rhythm interpretation skills. This video gives you a collection of about 20 back-to-back ECG Rhythms. In each ECG strip, you are given 15 seconds for interpretation. Test yourself and your colleagues. You may give your score in the comments section.
    18 and above correct answers: You are a STAR
    14 - 17 correct answers: You are GOOD
    13 and less correct answers: You need to come again for re-test after refreshing your ECG knowledge.
    P.S: This video only includes ECG Rhythms and not Ischemia-related ECGs.
    Credits: ECG Strips downloaded from
    www.skillstat.com/
    ________________________________________________________
    For useful medical posts, exam tips, and other medical pearls, visit our site:
    medigemz.com/
    Are you looking for exam orientation tips, mock tests, or other exam related tips? Please visit:
    medexamin.com/
    Please visit and subscribe to our RUclips channel for the latest videos:
    www.youtube.com/ @Last Second Medicine
    Explore our other medical RUclips channel as well:
    / @medexamin
    Visit us on Facebook: / lastsecondmedicine
    Disclaimer:
    Medical videos on our channel are intended for educational purposes. These are published exclusively for medical students. Students are encouraged to verify information through the reading of standard textbooks.
    🤝 Please comment below, about any new information on this topic.🤝
    ______________________________________________________________________
    #ECG_Test #ECG_Interpretation

Комментарии • 122

  • @tracelawson1367
    @tracelawson1367 9 месяцев назад +13

    0:18 sinus Bradycardia
    0:39 junctional rhythm
    1:00 sinus rhythm
    1:20 sinus arrhythmia
    1:42 wandering pacemaker
    2:02 sinus tachycardia
    2:24 atrial flutter
    2:44 accelerated junctional rhythm
    3:05 junctional tachycardia
    3:25 atrial fibrillation
    3:48 idioventricular rhythm
    4:08 accelerated idioventricular rhythm
    4:31 second degree AV block Mobitz type 1 / wenckebach
    4:52 SVT
    5:11 first degree AV block
    5:32 second degree AV block mobitz type 2
    5:53 PVC
    6:14 Third degree AV block
    6:35 Ventricular Tachycardia
    6:57 PAC
    7:17 Atrial pacing
    7:40 PJC
    7:59 paced ventricles
    8:20 VFIB

    • @PracticalMedicine
      @PracticalMedicine  9 месяцев назад +2

      Thanks

    • @tracelawson1367
      @tracelawson1367 9 месяцев назад

      @@PracticalMedicineNp, Did it to cheat on a test. Didn’t really work out 💀

  • @lkw5699
    @lkw5699 2 года назад +34

    That wandering pacemaker gets me everytime

  • @valentinocaine2294
    @valentinocaine2294 2 года назад +70

    The rhythm at 6:31 shows Normal Sinus Rhythm, not a PAC as listed. It would be an irregular rhythm.

  • @kalenclayton
    @kalenclayton 2 года назад +27

    ECG test in a few days. This just helped me identify a few rhythms that I need a little more work on. Thank you!

  • @perveennoor372
    @perveennoor372 3 года назад +6

    Saw this right before exams! Thanks a ton!

  • @chelsea9588
    @chelsea9588 2 года назад +34

    This is literally the perfect review before ACLS or a rhythm exam for work! Thanks!

  • @karentomas9442
    @karentomas9442 3 года назад +4

    super helpful practice video! thanks!

  • @annaciesielska4463
    @annaciesielska4463 Год назад +1

    that's great reviewing, thank you so much ❤

  • @shaneb.3982
    @shaneb.3982 3 года назад +2

    Thanks for the quick refresher.

  • @eljosepr10
    @eljosepr10 8 месяцев назад +1

    This beat is fire !!! Helped with my studying !!

  • @Freshknight7
    @Freshknight7 2 года назад +1

    These were great thanks!

  • @PoopScooper10000
    @PoopScooper10000 3 года назад +2

    Agreed! Thought I was crazy for a second

  • @AlexD-wi8lo
    @AlexD-wi8lo Год назад +1

    Thank you for this!

  • @jenniferjojotms3821
    @jenniferjojotms3821 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much!!!

  • @drgadham
    @drgadham 3 года назад +3

    Very good practice presentation 👌

  • @dr.deekshamedlife7488
    @dr.deekshamedlife7488 5 лет назад +3

    Excellent !!

  • @jab376
    @jab376 2 года назад +2

    Million thanks..

  • @annural_whitner
    @annural_whitner 2 года назад +2

    thank you!!

  • @premarawat7919
    @premarawat7919 Год назад +1

    I cnat believe that koi aise bhi padha skta hai ❤️

  • @gborowme
    @gborowme 2 года назад +1

    Thank you ☺️

  • @drgadham
    @drgadham 2 года назад +2

    Good presentation 👍

  • @saranyabathey4851
    @saranyabathey4851 3 года назад +1

    Video was very helpful

  • @sebastienkutusova9824
    @sebastienkutusova9824 4 года назад +1

    great it help me very much

  • @iy2608
    @iy2608 2 года назад +1

    Thanks you so much

  • @mr.x1363
    @mr.x1363 2 года назад +1

    Thanks 🙏

  • @drgadham
    @drgadham 5 лет назад +2

    VERY GOOD

  • @dandreaevanswarner4845
    @dandreaevanswarner4845 2 года назад +1

    Thankkk youuuu 🥰

  • @francesg3926
    @francesg3926 Год назад +1

    thank you

  • @joat9278
    @joat9278 Год назад +3

    This was excellent ! I passed my test with it❤ thank you!!

  • @5avilajohn
    @5avilajohn 5 месяцев назад +3

    Atrial Flutter actually has a fast HR typically around 300

    • @brandionatuesday9411
      @brandionatuesday9411 Месяц назад

      No…at that point 300 bpm it would be SVT. You can have a rate of less than 100 with a rhythm of a flutter.

  • @lebparr6139
    @lebparr6139 3 года назад +9

    That was fun!

    • @Papinca
      @Papinca 2 года назад +1

      Hello, We are working hard to develop competitive materials. I hope this is of use. TeachMeAandP. We would appreciate your support either on youtube or Patreon.
      www.patreon.com/TeachMeAandP
      ruclips.net/channel/UCZYQgK2AKo9dwIE7xDe0p8A

  • @dr.omarrashwan
    @dr.omarrashwan Месяц назад +1

    In 3:00 , it's VT not junctional tachycardia....junctional tachycardia is the same as SVT.....compare between both at 3:00 & 4:50 ...they are different

  • @farzane2606
    @farzane2606 Год назад +1

    Thank you so much. It was very helpful

  • @rajanjacob2577
    @rajanjacob2577 10 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent

  • @vahidmohamadi5884
    @vahidmohamadi5884 2 года назад +1

    amazing

  • @melvinleong3731
    @melvinleong3731 Год назад +1

    can anyone tell me which one is the most common for people

  • @dokotolobingoma7953
    @dokotolobingoma7953 4 года назад +2

    Beautiful video

  • @Cacio99
    @Cacio99 5 лет назад +24

    I think that PAC rhythms (at 6:55) isn't correct but i'm probably wrong

  • @ashwinkalaiselvan6358
    @ashwinkalaiselvan6358 Год назад +2

    Hats off to you, who made this video

  • @misbahkachchi2236
    @misbahkachchi2236 4 года назад +13

    I love how they ended the video with Ventricular Fibrillation 😄

    • @taliarose3166
      @taliarose3166 2 года назад +11

      Should’ve ended with asystole 😂

  • @dylanfitch2997
    @dylanfitch2997 3 года назад

    I have to remember wide qrs with no p wave or atrial origin is idoventricular

  • @blooddrunk4957
    @blooddrunk4957 Год назад +1

    Can someone explain to me how 6:57 is PAC? I'm not taking a class or anything, this is just a reoccurring hyperfixation of mine. But the only thing I can see is the different morphology of some p waves. I thought PAC's usually led to an irregular rate? Thanks in advance!

  • @jadensilva2227
    @jadensilva2227 Год назад +1

    Where is the PAC at 7:02?

  • @jocelynjohnson5065
    @jocelynjohnson5065 9 месяцев назад

    Have exam in a few days feeling overwhelmed trying to remember these strips for my exam any hints?

  • @kyleleggat175
    @kyleleggat175 2 года назад

    New to this

  • @helenyourlo581
    @helenyourlo581 4 года назад +11

    For the ECG labelled sinus arrhythmia, I think it may be wandering atrial pacemaker instead given that the p waves have different morphologies.

    • @bettysmith4527
      @bettysmith4527 2 года назад +1

      That is due to artifact, and is not a change in morphology. Change in morphology would include inverted, or lacking all together, as well as a change in shape. In order to have a wondering atrial pacemaker you need at least three different morphologies.

    • @tornikekharbedia8650
      @tornikekharbedia8650 2 года назад +1

      @@bettysmith4527 There are 3 different morphologies..

    • @valentinocaine2294
      @valentinocaine2294 2 года назад

      Look at the irregularity though. Sinus arrhythmia changes on breathing. A WAP will have different P wave morphologies, however, the overall rhythm should be regular if not nearly regular.

  • @hapax87
    @hapax87 3 года назад +17

    It would be nice if there were a brief intro to explain how to use this test practice.

  • @iganpparamarta8813
    @iganpparamarta8813 Год назад

    3:00 I immediately guessed VTach lol, when I saw the answer there is actually tiny non sinus Ps very close to QRS.

  • @candyxoxo506
    @candyxoxo506 4 года назад +3

    I got 2 wrong. Junctional tach and pjc . I know better now thanks to this vid!🙂

    • @PracticalMedicine
      @PracticalMedicine  4 года назад +1

      Thank you for appreciation

    • @ebuseman6
      @ebuseman6 2 года назад +1

      Junctional tach seemed more like svt to me due to the heart rate

  • @tahmeedahnaf5065
    @tahmeedahnaf5065 3 года назад +5

    that background music!

  • @X1OAFREED0M
    @X1OAFREED0M Год назад

    3:05 don't junctional rhythms have narrow QRS complexes? This looks more like vtach since the QRS is wide

    • @iganpparamarta8813
      @iganpparamarta8813 Год назад

      Possibly from an aberrant conduction, my guess was VTach too = regular wide QRS tachy + taller left ear. If you look closely there are small P waves very close to QRS complex, as explained by dr.Ken Grauer those Ps can't be sinus.

  • @Anne-kg7ee
    @Anne-kg7ee Год назад +2

    😍😍😍😍😍🔥🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏👏

  • @user-hv3pn7dj6g
    @user-hv3pn7dj6g 11 месяцев назад

    Sinus with PAC is tough

  • @Zizuthecreatorlamarwest
    @Zizuthecreatorlamarwest Год назад +1

    Plz add what leads these are, bc i dont know if it's lead avf ,II, or avr

  • @samuel.tatchim
    @samuel.tatchim 2 года назад

    Having issues with jonctional rhythms 😭

  • @doris7653
    @doris7653 7 месяцев назад

    Me too

  • @Flumazenil
    @Flumazenil Год назад +1

    Nice video. Get rid of the creepy music and put the sound of the monitor on instead.

  • @4emperor4
    @4emperor4 Год назад

    6:50 is SR not PAC
    been knocking me head out , rest was very usefull

  • @merboyontiveros5297
    @merboyontiveros5297 7 месяцев назад +1

    Any tips on retaining all this info

    • @PracticalMedicine
      @PracticalMedicine  7 месяцев назад +1

      Strengthen the basics of ECG interpretation.

  • @strawberrylala5529
    @strawberrylala5529 5 лет назад +2

    ♥️

  • @breadfan9
    @breadfan9 2 года назад +1

    The atrial contraction was wrong. That was just a sinus rh

  • @NJFireBuff
    @NJFireBuff 3 года назад +4

    6:50 where the hell do you see a pac

    • @PracticalMedicine
      @PracticalMedicine  3 года назад

      Lol. You're Right. It is difficult to see.

    • @Untamed_ayla
      @Untamed_ayla 3 года назад

      LOL I was just saying this outloud myself . I BARELY see it. I thought it was NSR.

  • @lkw5699
    @lkw5699 2 года назад

    No Torsades

  • @delilah8482
    @delilah8482 2 года назад +1

    i'm a first year medical student and this does not look like the ones in the book.... welp

  • @cliftonsuber
    @cliftonsuber 7 месяцев назад

    Am i the only one who didnt see any PAC's

  • @alice010185
    @alice010185 4 года назад +22

    I appreciate you all providing educational content however whoever made this video has no business making an EKG video, there are mistakes and incorrect terminology throughout.
    At 6:55 it says "Premature atrial rhythm" which they then abbreviated "PAC" which actually stand for premature atrial contraction. Also that PR does not look short but it's also hard to tell because it's not on an EKG background (like with squares). Even if the PR is normal the p wave morphology is normal except in one spot.
    Also at 3:05 that's too wide to be junctional.
    AT 5:56 that's SR with PVC's NOT "premature ventricular rhythm" which isn't even really a correct term. And again it has PVC next to it which stand for premature ventricular contraction NOT what they specified.
    7:03 looks like there's a pacer spike in front of the QRS, obviously there isn't because the complex isn't wide however whoever drew that picture misrepresents it a little.

    • @anandrahangdale5214
      @anandrahangdale5214 3 года назад +2

      Alice, yo must have read How to win friends and influence people!

    • @shaneb.3982
      @shaneb.3982 3 года назад +1

      Make you should make a better video know it all. People like you really irritate me.

    • @eb5671
      @eb5671 3 года назад +1

      @@anandrahangdale5214 irrelevant

    • @eb5671
      @eb5671 3 года назад +1

      @@shaneb.3982 Have fun learning the wrong material and thinking you're smart!

    • @bettysmith4527
      @bettysmith4527 2 года назад +6

      Alice looks like YOU have more studying to do dear! Junctional rhythms can in fact be wide if you have aberrant conduction either because the patient has an underlying bundle branch block, or because of slower conduction secondary to a faster rate. In 7:03 that is an ATRIAL PACEMAKER (hence the pacer spike you see before the P wave), as identified in the video, which WOULD NOT cause widening of the QRS since the impulse would be traveling down the atria and into the AV junction normally. READ UP BEFORE YOU INSULT THE WORK OF OTHERS, it is you who needs to study!! I will give you your first complaint about the PAC, there was no PAC in that running strip, so yes they screwed up that one.