I believe there is. Social media and the ease of access to thousands of people have basically created a large group of people that would fall under the banner of Psychopath. This is because the social media is all about gaining a collection of short term gains/gratification (Likes, comments, subscribers and thumbs up from a multitude of people) from a large group of the population thus people engage in this behavior thus more Psychopaths. Sad enough you see this in dating Jordan openly states in one of his talks that the men who have the best success on dating apps are psychopaths. So if you wanna get better at dating you need to develop and cultivate psychopathic behaviour. By extension this means the uptick in Psychopaths is because of women because women continue to choose to sleep with and date Psychopaths. Men in order to stay competitive in the dating market have to become Psychopaths.
id argue weve always had the same amount of psychopaths, i think the way the world is today so transparent with evil, that its easy to find more psychopaths. you see the black girl who killed the white girl in missouri? looks like it to me. I think psychopaths dont build vendettas against people, so when they mention it at 4:47 i think psychopaths are more impersonal and are actually screwing people over for their own gain, because psychopaths lack so much empathy and typical emotions, that there is an element of neurotypical emotional pain from building a vendetta, that psychopaths don't really hold. if a psychopath is betrayed, he'll be pissed off, but he doesnt do things out of anger, he does things out of self interest. now granted, who is to say that psychopaths don't ever act neurotypical? we all have mixes of black and white in us. the psychopath consciously screws over other people, knowing full well of the consequences and the ramifications of their choices. the psychopath doesnt care. thats the endline goal. if a child steals an orange, its out of ignorance, a psychopath isnt ignorant. the real question is, do we want a psychopath to be defined as evil, or simply mentally ill and challenged?
I have the feeling Destiny is not really listening. He just wants to disprove JP on every level. Edit: i meant in this part of the video. In total I do think it was a very nice debate.
JP is a PhD. Psychologist who has taught at Harvard. He gives "Destiny", a college dropout, a definition of psychopathy. Destiny replies, "maybe that might be true".
@@socksrocksdocks - the "argument from authority" fallacy would be appropriate if they were arguing a proposition ("if ... then"). This was just a query about the meaning of professional terminology. JP is a respected professional in the field and destiny is an ignoramus
Perhaps, because his "definition" is just wrong. And by the way Peterson got fired from Harvard by the same guy who hired him, after evaluating Petersons "teaching methods".
@@karlnonnenfutter7726 interested in where you found this info. It seems he left Harvard and went back to Canada. All along publishing and being cited regularly. Peterson has his shortcomings but not as a distinguished academic.
public opinion can hardly ever hold a candle to truth and reality @@karlnonnenfutter7726 just because he disagrees with the majority of doctors on specific things does not mean he is wrong it could just mean he is ahead of his time like Edgar alen poe or Darwin or Nikola tesla
Yah destiny was majorly outted in this interview. Destiny acts as if Jordan peterson is blatantly wrong about everything he says. He debates literally every single point jordan peterson makes 😂
But what definition is that, though? It varies a lot, depending on which person or professional you're asking. I imagine many of them would flat out reject the term, as it isn't part of the diagnostic manuals and no longer defined within a scientific framework. It went out of such use decades ago. Now it's just a layman's term or a short-hand, making your entire point moot.
The last DSM has re-structured the hierarchy of psychological conditions/disorders lately by a lot. E.g. there's no Asperger's anymore, now it's a form of autism. Psychopathy being put under ASPD is another change. It's a valid inquiry as to why JP seemingly uses dated terminology
I wouldn't use labels to discredit someone. Sometimes someone that isn't a major for instance can still be correct. Not that I believe this is the case here I do stand by the idea that Jordan is right, but I see it more as one did more research and spent more time on practicing the field than the other. Destiny cannot fact check that at the moment so he chose to believe it because he has no reference to go back on.
And he is also very manipulative at times. His “arsenal” is confused for competence every time he opens his mouth, which is deceitful. There were major falsehoods with points he made in this clip, but he speaks so convincingly- people assume he is correct and being factual. He is legit, at times. But also very sneaky and has become a total narcissist over the last few years. A shame.
Jordan likes those ppl to show off how his public hero persona is built. Most of his memorable interviews that get him high price tickets for his talks, tend to have this planned dramatic energy.
He’s doesn’t realise that Koran is telling him that he has all the personality traits to become a psychopath and he’s just trying to prove his own dumb ideology
But he, my man Destiny, talks fast and moves his arms around a lot along with his fingers making funny shapes and he has weird off topic responses like a boss.
Imagine telling a psychologist he might be right about psychological nomenclature. This Destiny kid needs to switch to decaf and understand who he is talking to.
Destiny thinking in his head 100% - if i remotly agreed with jordan even though i know he is speaking better then me and speaking facts after facts so clearly, but if i agreed with him and admitted submission, I'LL LOOSE MY PERCEIVED REPUTATION. 😂. Somebody needs to tell this blue haired wannabe you are already lost. Nobody ever comes out alive fighting TRUTH with lies. Honest JP followers knows that too well. Destiny is the definition of my generation that wants to seed chaos, you know, very relatable to the joker from batman mentality, some people wants to watch the world burn just for drama. They don't care about money, destiny a year ago said it clearly he already has few millions in bank now he just wants to enjoy drama cause he is safe from being cancelled anyway. Disgusting losser
Jordan proved to be mostly all insecurity and narcissism in this. He can't engage with destiny in any honest manner. he is in total "I'M THE SMART MONKEY TEACHER I KNOW MORE YOU DON'T SCARE ME". Peterson was like that the entire time. Dude is a total fucking clown who got the intellectual fucking crap beat out of him by Matt Dillahunty.
@@lifeofliam2164 Destiny takes notes hoping for "gotcha" moments as well I suspect. His primary motivation isn't towards truth, but to be right/prove the opposition wrong.
And also it was Destiny who was asking here. "What Is your view on xyz" What do you believe here What is this... He was trying to ask questions to understand his position. Where did you get the vibe he was showing off?
god i understand why people hate Peterson so much now. This interpretation is so ridiculously funny. A lot of parallels to the "XYZ OWNED/DESTROYED THIS PERSON" right wing crowd. Lost in Narratives you are making up in your head.
Destiny neurotically asks a leading question, Jordan expertly breaks it down while Destiny ( not listening and fidgeting constantly) then tries to disengage with a follow up question about a completely different scenario.. and repeat
Do all these people in the comments have Traumatic Brain Injury or is this some massive PSYOP? Like did we even watch the same video? All I see is Destiny asking questions and constantly conceding
I don’t know about that. Psychopathy is to crave (or merely acquiesce) to be part of a social hierarchy (ANY social structure, on any rung of the ladder, for that matter) that is, in itself, an embodiment of criminal insanity. This world is a cosmic prison for criminally insane. It has to be, there’s no other way of explaining it.
@@claudiamanta1943 This is unintelligible. You are saying psychopathy is to desire to be a part of a criminally insane social hierarchy? Meaning psychopathy means to want to be a part of a preconceived group comprised of psychopaths, this is self referential and meaningless. You need to ground yourself man, drink some tea look at nature for a while.
If i look up the definition its a bit more complex than what JP said here. Honestly his definition is so vague anyone and my dog qualifies as a psychopath....
@@Chaelsonen Destiny talking about climate change using wlklpedla knowledge is not intelligent 😂😂 destiny has no clue what the actual data shows. JP called him out on this
@@brockcharz2104 you heard people bringing up how JP is a professor of psychology, and the questioning of psychology terms and thought "they must be talking about climate change" ?
Not to brag...but I figured out destiny in the 1st 4 minutes of seeing him a few years ago.... I don't need a psychology degree to determine arrogant, narcissism and drug induced delusions..... Destiny is the same as one of my siblings....he believes that speaking loud, fast, and aggressively makes whatever he says correct whether it's correct or not. Brutal. I loathe this guy to the same degree that I loathe Hitler.
Destiny trying to outsmart a clinical psychologist, with more clinical experience than Destiny has been alive. Tells you essentially what you need to know.
@@reasonabledictator8993 This isn’t the full debate I was commenting on, I thought that was obvious. Maybe you need information handed to you in excess to understand someone else’s point. It’s also not the only debate I’ve watched of either of these folks. And you should already know insulting others isn’t going to win you any points.
I didn’t really get the feeling he was trying to outsmart him though. He was just pointing at possible holes in Peterson’s logic. That’s like the point of a debate. And it made for a super interesting conversation. I don’t really know why your making it sound like destiny was being an ass
@@isaacmurphy6703 Yes it was interesting. But clearly it was more than just pointing out holes in his logic. It becomes even more pronounced when you look at his other debates.
@@claudiamanta1943 This is just stupid. Disagreeable is in common parlance. It isn't a show of dominance to use your expertise in conversations, especially when you were the one to stumble into their ring. Do you get angry at an electrician for explaining what your breaker box does? You look at life through painted glasses.
This feels like when i was 8 and i am asking my dad about the world and he says all the things that are true objectively that i don't like to hear and then i get grumpy at him.
Another comparison is when you talk to a child who thinks she's the smartest person in the room, but she's really only just a precocious child. Sure, she's smart & clever for her age, and she's ambitious, and maybe she'll actually become someone who has non-childish ideas, but her confidence and ego actually stop her from learning.
@@AD-wg8ik Are we supposed to feel guilty for having a dad? What a jackass as comment. I had a Dad. He died at 46 when I was 17. Your comment screams poor me, and you should feel bad because you had a Dad and I didn't. Sounds like something someone highly manipulative would say. Must be nice lol, anyone who starts with that is showing resentment
It's not extrodinary, cause he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you want to actually learn about psychopaths read The Psychopath by Mary Turner Thompson and/or The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson.
@@herrbonk3635 Destiny (aka Steven) is a political streamer. He’s moderate left. He’s very intelligent but he’s used to debating pseudo-intellectuals who he can out talk. He has a machine gun style of debate where he bombards the other side with bullets until they can’t take it anymore. Jordan Peterson is an actual intellectual so that style of debate was ineffective. JP can take it and throw it back to him easily. He took control of the debate methodically and clearly had better strategy. He also used all of Steven’s flaws against him. He consistently cornered him and let him talk his way off the ledge. Steven was out of his depth on this one.
@V3ryW3LL lmao that's rich coming from some dork who can't spell very well. The 90's called, they wanted you to know that L33t was in fact always stupid.
It seems Destiny needed to talk to a counselor for quite a long time, thank you Dr. Jordan Peterson, I think Destiny grew with this interaction. Peace.🤞🙏🏻🖖
I see this criticism too much. He uses open language all the time, like how he says "I feel like" rather than "this is this way I know it" type language.
@@GalaxyGeassS2 It's an apt criticism. It's bad to overuse hedging, and Destiny does it way too much. Especially for how arrogantly he stands by his opinions. If all you use is fuzzy words you yourself become fuzzy. This is useful to obfuscate yourself from potential attackers, which is a cowardly tactic for someone as aggressive as Destiny. This is fundamentally because Destiny values optics over integrity, in my opinion. ⬅(reasonable hedging in practice) Im going to rewrite my comment while overusing hedging, so you can see what it looks like. I think that it's a somewhat reasonable criticism. It probably isn't good to overuse hedging, and Destiny possibly does it a bit too much. Especially for how arrogantly I feel that he stands by his opinions. If all you use is fuzzy words you could feasibly become fuzzy yourself. This might be useful to obfuscate yourself from potential attackers, which could be a cowardly tactic for someone who seems aggressive as Destiny. This is assumedly because Destiny probably values optics over integrity, in my opinion. ⬅(way too much hedging) You can see how the second example is much weaker.
@@Tryin2Bnice45 Health professionals don't tend to use the diagnostic terminology in their every day talks with people outside of the profession. And Jordan isn't wrong for using it, quite frankly it's more helpful to have a low resolution model for most people who don't read up on medical journals. But if you have watched any current practicing therapist and psychologist who talk about their profession and they have gone over psychopathy in the last 5 years. They still use it, but I can't remember the last time I saw someone mention the word and not come with the disclaimer that psychopathy is technically still no longer being used as a diagnosis, and is now put under the ASPD umbrella when they retired DSM-5. Having followed Destiny for a bit, I'm sure that is how he has heard it described before he then read up on what they were citing or when he can he'll just ask people he knows who's job it is to know these things. But he's was obviously not going to waste time trying to get into the weeds of arguing about it the way Jordan and Sam got stuck on what the word truth meant. Something Destiny knew could be a possibility going in and wanted to avoid it at all cost, so the OG post is actually silly. The mistake I see so many people here make is that they treat this clip and their interaction as if it's a zero sum game. Like Jordan's recent conversation with Alex if you had actually seen them talk about it before hand you would know they went on his show. Because there are things that he's said they genuinely wanted some clarifications on but haven't actually gotten to that point. Since so many people who have tried to talk to him about it would do one of two things. Either be hostile because they are so stupid they can't tell the difference between Jordan and Tate. Or they don't really challenge him on when he goes around the question. The talks and their goals were different but I think Alex did a better job than Destiny. Jordan still danced around certain subjects for reasons I don't understand, but for once Jordan would actually steelman the person asking the question and give additonal clarifying examples where I for the first time finally got the sense that Jordan doesn't dance around it because he wants to be able to flirt and dogwhistle to certain subsections of the audience to use his answers as scapegoats. For instance when they went into the example about how if Jordan was a witness to a crime, he wouldn't afterwards tell the cops interviewing him who asked him what he saw "what do you mean by see exactly?"
@@redrumax I used to play rust onthe same server as destiny and from the interactions I had with him in that game there is something seriously wrong with him. He is like some type of energy vampire that feeds off groups of insecure idiots.
Sometimes we do it to vent. We have a man at the office who talks over people and is sometimes a bit touchy to women. When we go out for drinks after work, he occasionally comes up in conversation where people will talk about what he did. It is gossip and joking but its for them to vent their frustration (100 percent no evil intent)
@@leigh7507 Yeah I would argue that it is a short term Band-Aid. You still have to deal with him tomorrow and the next day. I would think someone talking over people to the point where no one can get a word in and are afraid to even stand up for their case, their truth would make the environment worse. I had that at my old job with the manager. Guy thinks his anger and strictness is power but it really is his weakness. It was one reason I left that company. You eventually start to lose the ones who bring real value because they can be somewhere else. I do think if you have to deal with that for a time to get something better in the end, it would be a small sacrifice. I guess what I am saying is, that can be a problem in the long term but whether you have to worry or not about it I would think depends on your own goals. I chose not to deal with it because long term, it fucked my mental health up bad where I was more happy jobless than working there full time. With annoying customers however, it was more dealing with that for a small amount of time so it really wasn't anything to care about since it will happen once in a while and most likely they won't last as employees or business owners if they are too into their toxic ways.
@@leigh7507 yeah that's not the same thing. You're rationalizing bad behaviour or severely misinformed. Gossip is intended to be disparge someone's reputation for no real gain. Venting is intended to help with emotional dysregulation or trauma. Most people aren't venting when gossiping, they are spreading rumours, half truths and do so intentionally to spite another human. Narcissistic as hell and liable to leave you alone near the end of your life and just as spiteful with no respite
Even if JP thought he was, he would never call it out. Anyone that has studied and truly understands psychopaths and narcissists knows that the one thing you never do under any circumstances is call them out.
@@Jwareness wrong,you carefully call them out and draw a line they don’t cross and if they do cross it they know the outcome exposes them.They soon scoot off to find another victim.
@@KingFinkyStingers That could only work with one which is self-aware, which is rare, and even then it will still often end up backfiring on you. It's simply never advisable to call them out. All the top psychologists who specialize in these personality traits will tell you the same thing.
If you know mbti jordan is ENTJ and destiny seems Entp they’re twinflame opposite they conflict over morality ( jordan ) / ideology ( destiny) Ideological people are idealistic and naive and think in black and white and they are goofy and trollish they are okay with the far left ideologies ( communism) they seek a government to completely take control over their lives and feed them so they could live whimsically like children because they lack accountability and responsibility in their minds they think once another ideological leader be in command he will “ save them “ because he will promise them total utopia or fairness or spare them the strain of work which is never the case its always about shifting power in his/her hand and a total grip on the state also to force people to view reality in the tunnel vision that psychopath leader wish to enforce it on them , these people are psychologically immature in all of their decisions they usually will pick people that are close to their nature
I like how a person who is literally an expert in the field that has both cited papers and has not only taught undergraduates but people working ion their own masters and phd theists has this guy trying to correct him or saying I agree as though he was in any position to validate what is being told to him.
Peterson is a psychopath. He has lost his mind and they are going to take his license away. He is a failure and a disgrace and he wears ugly clothes too what a strange person.
He is perfectly within his rights to agree or disagree. Never accept an argument from authority. Even very accomplished people can be wrong, especially in the heat of a discussion.
😂😂😂Peterson a renowned psychologist?! Don't confuse actual academic work with writing some half-baked pseudoscientific literature. This guy is a (pretty bad) joke.
The last DSM has re-structured the hierarchy of psychological conditions/disorders lately by a lot. E.g. there's no Asperger's anymore, now it's a form of autism. Psychopathy being put under ASPD is another change. It's a valid inquiry as to why JP seemingly uses dated terminology
Thats a symptom. Root causation for NPD is a completely ignored child who realizes that they are only going to be valid if they make everything about themself and minimize anything and everything about everyone else.
Fun fact: this desire is from a false self the Narcissist created to cope with the external world because when comes the phase the child separates from the external object, specially his mother, he experiences trauma, usually from parents or family but could be anyone so they don’t even have a true self, therefore they don’t have ego nor superego.
@@ThiagoSFFranco ? youre spewing bs, narcissists absolutely have an ego, the ego is just how we see ourselves, that would essentially mean you don't think they are sentient...
@@Aryzo you can call it bs, it is not up to me to debate with you the meaning of the word "ego" but it seems you only know one but there you go... e·go /ˈēɡō/ noun a person's sense of self-esteem or self-importance. "a boost to my ego" PHILOSOPHY (in metaphysics) a conscious thinking subject. ***PSYCHOANALYSIS*** the part of the mind that mediates *between the conscious and the unconscious* and is *responsible for reality testing* and a *sense* of *personal identity*. I am obviously referring to the Psychoanalysis meaning and that dictionary definitions explains what my comment ment. If you like to research and to learn more about these topics, specially Narcissism, please, I suggest you learn first hand from a diagnosed one who is hugely acknowledged worldwide and works at educating people to *deal* with Narcissists, Psychos, Borderlines and many other Personality Disorders (specially, Cluster B though), *Professor Sam Vaknin*. He is at the forefront for raising awareness and knowledge over Narcissistic Abuse and how to prevent it or to cope for those who were unfortunate to being through it already. So, you can either spend hours studying Vaknin's material like video channels, articles, books, crosscheck with other references (many he refers to himself either when he agrees or disagrees but always explains minutely why) and either learn something that changes your perspective or, you could continue to call it bs as well, whatever but, what you cannot or should not do is to call bs on matters you don't know enough about, even the meaning of the word you got wrong, but you know what? That is ok! There is always room for improvement if we make it. Remember that there is always something you don't know yet and keep your "ego" (now as the self-importance sense) in check.
The subject of psychology is THE subject for Jordan Peterson. I think he has a very deep understanding of human behavior and archetype, and I wish he engaged more in these types of conversations.
This was a really interesting conversation to listen to.he fact that some people can't view it without saying "Wow, Jordan DESTROYED Destiny" or "Destiny DEBUNKED this loon!" is disheartening.
Jordan Peterson literally gave you the definition of a Psychopath and you got it wrong lol. If you blindly accept anyone's opinion, you're an idiot, not a psychopath because you aren't doing it for your own benefit at the expense of others
This interview was one of the most amazing things I have witnessed, Destiny laid out his motivations, and almost told us that he could no longer be taken as someone who is misguided and still seeks truth, he just fell off the paid shill cliff. It was a masterful performance by Jordan Peterson, I’ve never seen anything like it.
Destiny seems to want to find a line between psychopathy and non-psychopathy, and between force and not-force. In reality, people won't agree on where that line is. We *might* be able to agree to the extremes.
I think this is true of many (most?) things that aren't an atomic construction of parts, but a pattern that is recognized. I.e. where do you draw the line between a chair and a non-chair? That kind of thing...
Jordan Peterson is such an incredibly intelligent man. I enjoy hearing him talk, I feel like I learn how to be a better & more understanding person each time.
JP has been studying, writing, and teaching about Anti Social behavior at the absolute highest level for decades. Imagine trying to correct him on that topic.
There's a recent study I heard about recently that said that 10 male psychopaths to 1 female psychopath is not accurate, that it's actually 1.2 male psychopaths to 1 female psychopaths. Which would probably nearly double the amount of psychopaths in the world. Considering the number of psychopaths in society was pegged at between 4 to 6 percent... probably mean psychopaths are around 10 percent!
The amount of psychopaths changes depending on wether or not there is social unrest. They increase when society allows them to exist, basically. So the amount of psychopaths increasing among women should tell you something
Jordan peterson has said that social media has acted as a catalyst and enablement of online forms of psychopath. With the majority of it's users being female if I'm not mistaken, then naturally female psychopathology would rise as a consequence
Here is the value I extracted from the interaction: There's a tetrad of traits: Narcissism - Desire for unearned social status Machiavellianism - Propensity to manipulate, degree of manipulativeness Psychopathy - Parasitism that is predatory in nature Sadism - The result of obtaining gratification employing the methods derived from the prior three traits. "If the aftermath of disagreement can be tilted in the direction of those traits, that's when the intention becomes malevolent and the problem of force becomes paramount". This perspective elucidates the underlying complexities resulting from disagreements with intrinsically malevolent motivations present. I see the interaction as a logical mechanism for identifying malevolent intent within a high emotion disagreement. ....Knibb High Football RULES!!!
Exactly, it's called having a discussion and being open minded. Not being a absolutely sure zealot. Is that what you want in the world? for everyone to be convinced of any thing they have come to conclusion of first, without question?
@@GalaxyGeassS2 No, those are different things. What he is doing is called hedging which is just a method of saving face if you are proven wrong. It can be useful if your ego wouldn't normally allow you to change opinions. You instead never make concrete statements of opinion so you never need to own up to the fact that you can in fact be wrong and so never confront your ego.
In the security business we were taught that the first level of force was verbal persuasion. I disagreed. I believe the first level of force is nonverbal persuasion. In any case I find it interesting that force does not always have to be physical.
Its really a matter of what the (en)forcer thinks will be the most effective route initially, within the bounds of the circumstance. Its not necessarily/definitively either. Dependent on the person and the circumstance.
In normative, legal and active use of force the verbal level is the first one because you need to protect yourself about litigious individuals and institutions.
Just because someone says they are an expert in something doesn’t mean everything they say is correct. He could’ve disagreed with something JP said and JP could’ve interjected with statements of clarity for the sake of clearing up misunderstandings. I can disagree with a doctors assessment or diagnosis and go to a second opinion. Experts aren’t always right. Look at the beginning of the pandemic and how Experts were trying to figure it out. It wasn’t until later that we got the real answers.
Disagreeableness Is just one of the traits in the big 5 personality model. It's only related to psychopathy in so far that being a man is related to psychopathy.
@@andreiadetavora8471 I'm not sure what you are saying? I'm saying that being disagreeable does not make you a psychopath. I'm not disagreeing that the disagreeable trait is necessary for psychopathy. Like how putting wheels on grandma doesn't make her a car.
Peterson is just so clear and strong and mature, and a deep intellect. The guy on the right side of the screen comes off like kind of an irritating. inexperienced high school kid. This was a dramatic mismatch. Can't give it a thumbs up...sorry.
I have listen to Destiny speaking for less than 5 minutes total and I can clearly tell he has no idea at all the difference between right and wrong. he thinks that gossiping about someone is not necessarily so bad if he simply doesn't care about the person he's gossiping about. in a way I'd actually say that makes it worse..
Holy cow. Destiny needs to shut up and listen. Like the Woke generally he knows a little about many things (enough to be absolutely wrong, for the most part) and generally unwilling to move beyond his ignorance.
Yeah... we haven't watched the same debate buddy. Both of these guys were respectful trough the conversation. And destiny even though he disagreed took the time to understand jordans arguments before saying what he thinks. To be fair he was right when he said that people care less about the debate itself then making their side seem educated and calm and opponents unhinged and insane. The more I watch destiny ben Shapiro and Jordan the more I hate extremes like hasan, matt walsh and other divisive extremist psychos.
Lol. Ok. I think I won't engage in discussion with someone that calls himself "@@demolisher-ng1dh ." But thanks for coming out to play. Still open to comments from any non-Trolls or non-Perverts, folks.
As someone who usually can't stand listening to Mr. Peterson talk about subjects like philosophy and religion. I always find it a great pleasure to hear him talk about psychology, he's really a great deal more concise, articulate, knowledgeable and engaging as a speaker on the subject. When you hear him talk about religion one is often left with the impression he doesn't know where it's going, that he has finished formulating the thought yet.
I feel like you must either have a distain of religion or a lack of interest for theology to have this opinion. His theological content is some of the most insightful content I have ever consumed.
I'm a JP fan but you're making an argument from authority. That's like saying "Why didn't everyone get the vacs? Do they think they know more than actual doctors??"
@@littlewigglemonster7691 Who are you even talking about? Me? So are the words "licensed" and "therapist" supposed to be words that are too big to understand now? What are you, five years old? Even if you were talking about the other comment using the word "psychoanalyzed", that's a common word used in college. I swear we need an age limit for some types of videos since kids like you can barely even read.
Ive a doctorate in psychopathy. The only thing that links obesity to psychopathy would be poor impulse control. However thats not enough to claim someone meets the criteria. The mistake many make is to infer that someone haivng a few traits means a person meets the criteria for the disorder. Thats because most dont know the items that make up the disorder can exist on their own. Whats interesting about this conversation is Joran is basically pointing out to him that he may have some of the traits. What is weird however is him writing some of what Jordan says down as if he is wanting to use this info in a debate.
There is misconception that psychopathy involves impulse. There are very few real world examples that form good case studies that can accurately be used as reference. One trait that does tend to be central to psychopathy is deceit. The term also gets improperly used to describe people that do have impulse control issues that descend into violent rage. Crimes of passion also get lumped into psychopathy.
@@Art-is-craftnone of that is true. Impulsivity is right there in the PCL-R. Deceit isnt. Crimes of passion also is nonsense. Clinical Psychopathy is assessed using the PCL-R, it appears you are unfamiliar with it.
@@harryhill8543 You do not think psychopathy has deceit? So you think at the worst manifestation’s there is no guarding behaviours. The vast majority of people that are psychopaths all practice deceit at a central level. It is part of their very being and it is very thing that allows them to operate. Other behaviours include lack of empathy.
@@Art-is-craftpsychopathy is what is measured by the PCL-R. That is the accepted clinical model. You are simply using words that you think fits with the description of what you think a psychopath is. It never fails when a psychopathy video appears on youtube that people claiming expertise on the matter pipe up with nonsense opinions which simply flags up to people who actually do the research that they know nothing and are generally informed by crappy fiction. Also "lack of empathy" isnt even a behaviour lol. "The vast majority of people that are psychopaths all practice deceit at a central level", is this copied directly from a bad true crime novel or is it a B movie?
@@shelleycline3542 Destiny projects his behavior so when he said people will drop principles for short term gratification at the drop of a hat, he was talking for himself. Destiny has no principles. He constantly contradicts himself in order to win an arguement, so Jordan saying that behavior is psychopathic, he was talking about Destiny even if he didn't know it.
@abbemartensson3850 Anime??? This is just a drawing of a lady astronaut 😭 Nerdy ass name Pseudo intellectual Victim complex Yup it's a conservative 😭🤣😭😅🤣🤣❣️🍆💦💦💦
Jordan is speaking in the terms of Forest Before the Tree's and when applicable Tree's before the Forest. Destiny is still trying to figure out what the tree and what the forest is.
I really dislike Destiny's passive-aggressiveness and the way he talks over Peterson. This is not an honest interview or even a discussion, he just wants to be right and likes his own voice. It's weird how some people who do this (talking to people) for a living are incredibly unsuited for it. All I hear is Destiny's annoyance that he has to do this and the hatred for the person he is interviewing. He feels incredibly biased and threatened that he doesn't have the room all for himself.
Destiny said he was skeptical of everything regarding the vaccines, climate change, etc. in this debate. He is the least skeptical person of anybody I can think of. Total conformist to everything except for wokeness.
This guy wants to be right at all costs, it’s counterproductive, there is no deep thinking from his side, just noises to dominate the space, painful to watch. 😢
@@Gettothegone exactly. I mean come on,are there actually people taking him seriously ? “having my son” sounds like the sap had “sympathy pains” 🫰🏼fools and their money are soon parted. What baffles me is what is the appeal of him or his ilk ? 💁🏼♂️
Jordan isn't very smart, he takes most of his ideas from other people and have almost no ideas from their own personal vision, on top of that he is easily offended, he can't handle notifications on X platform of people who don't agree with him, which is ridiculous given his old age and him supposedly been a grown man, an adult, he only got famous out of disagreeing with woke people, nothing special.
There were a couple of exchanges where Peterson calls Destiny out for quoting "studies" as proof of his position, and then proceeds to cite his own "peer-reviewed studies" as his evidence. Imagine being this young dude, going up against this incredibly smart and articulate man. He may be wrong (a lot), but much respect for his ability to interact with Peterson
Destiny does not seem genuinely interested in the questions he's asking--it's extremely funny and ironic that JP pointed out Destiny's disagreeableness, and how meta the conversation is, being that at the start it's mentioned that conversations between men are often, if not always, combative in a certain sense. Really, Destiny is always trying to 'win' the conversation, and this is why nothing that comes out of his mouth can be taken at face value. I'm not sure if he qualifies as a psychopath or not, and I don't think the 'truth' of such categorization matters, but man do I not like the dude.
Are There More Psychopaths Now Then Ever?
Consider giving a like if you enjoyed the video.
More people on the planet than there ever has been, so perhaps there are
@@Caprese1.0 Fair Enough.
I believe there is. Social media and the ease of access to thousands of people have basically created a large group of people that would fall under the banner of Psychopath. This is because the social media is all about gaining a collection of short term gains/gratification (Likes, comments, subscribers and thumbs up from a multitude of people) from a large group of the population thus people engage in this behavior thus more Psychopaths.
Sad enough you see this in dating Jordan openly states in one of his talks that the men who have the best success on dating apps are psychopaths. So if you wanna get better at dating you need to develop and cultivate psychopathic behaviour. By extension this means the uptick in Psychopaths is because of women because women continue to choose to sleep with and date Psychopaths. Men in order to stay competitive in the dating market have to become Psychopaths.
id argue weve always had the same amount of psychopaths, i think the way the world is today so transparent with evil, that its easy to find more psychopaths. you see the black girl who killed the white girl in missouri? looks like it to me.
I think psychopaths dont build vendettas against people, so when they mention it at 4:47 i think psychopaths are more impersonal and are actually screwing people over for their own gain, because psychopaths lack so much empathy and typical emotions, that there is an element of neurotypical emotional pain from building a vendetta, that psychopaths don't really hold.
if a psychopath is betrayed, he'll be pissed off, but he doesnt do things out of anger, he does things out of self interest. now granted, who is to say that psychopaths don't ever act neurotypical? we all have mixes of black and white in us. the psychopath consciously screws over other people, knowing full well of the consequences and the ramifications of their choices. the psychopath doesnt care. thats the endline goal. if a child steals an orange, its out of ignorance, a psychopath isnt ignorant.
the real question is, do we want a psychopath to be defined as evil, or simply mentally ill and challenged?
Yes they're called women
I have the feeling Destiny is not really listening. He just wants to disprove JP on every level. Edit: i meant in this part of the video. In total I do think it was a very nice debate.
He just wants to talk (making sense is something else).
the amout of grown men crying because peterson came out of this looking like a loon is incredible and halarious all at the same time 😂😂😂😂
@@alexmartinez-og8guYou must have watched a different video than the rest of us.
Not a whole lot going on up stairs hu?@@alexmartinez-og8gu
That’s his entire brand
JP is a PhD. Psychologist who has taught at Harvard. He gives "Destiny", a college dropout, a definition of psychopathy. Destiny replies, "maybe that might be true".
i agree with the fact destiny is debate bro contrarian
but the argument from authority plenty of idiot doctors who would get crushed by JP
@@socksrocksdocks - the "argument from authority" fallacy would be appropriate if they were arguing a proposition ("if ... then"). This was just a query about the meaning of professional terminology. JP is a respected professional in the field and destiny is an ignoramus
Perhaps, because his "definition" is just wrong. And by the way Peterson got fired from Harvard by the same guy who hired him, after evaluating Petersons "teaching methods".
@@karlnonnenfutter7726 interested in where you found this info. It seems he left Harvard and went back to Canada. All along publishing and being cited regularly.
Peterson has his shortcomings but not as a distinguished academic.
public opinion can hardly ever hold a candle to truth and reality @@karlnonnenfutter7726
just because he disagrees with the majority of doctors on specific things does not mean he is wrong it could just mean he is ahead of his time like Edgar alen poe or Darwin or Nikola tesla
"If you're disagreeable. Like you are by the way!"
I think that was one of my favorite moments of someone saying, STFU and quit interrupting me.
😂 I was hunting for just this comment. I knew someone had to have made it long before I saw this video.
😂😂😂😂
You're reading entirely too much into this.
@@Aryzo no, you are.
With a smile
Destiny trying to prove Jordan wrong at every moment is just so laughable.
Yah destiny was majorly outted in this interview. Destiny acts as if Jordan peterson is blatantly wrong about everything he says. He debates literally every single point jordan peterson makes 😂
@@veely5363 debates is a very generous word ✌🏼😂
He's just being a contrarian for the heck of it. He's not asking questions to arrive at* truths anymore.
That man is beyond his depth so far, it's like being dropped in the Pacific Ocean
He's wrong about everything except maybe psychology. @@veely5363
Destiny saying to Psychologist "Ok, that might be the truth." about something he has zero knowledge about himself is so pure ^^
And he continuously tries to talk over JP. Oof. Lol
I laughed. Like Dr. P needs reassurance from Destiny. He is delusional if the thinks he is even close...🤣
Psychologies is a science that is ever changing.
psychology is a field filled with people who have no clue what they're talking about, so take what he says with a grain of salt.
@@Iceican destiny constantly talks about things he has no clue about so take things he says with a pinch of salt
“Ok yeah that might be True” said the video gamer to the psychologist after being explained the definition of psychopathy
But what definition is that, though? It varies a lot, depending on which person or professional you're asking. I imagine many of them would flat out reject the term, as it isn't part of the diagnostic manuals and no longer defined within a scientific framework. It went out of such use decades ago. Now it's just a layman's term or a short-hand, making your entire point moot.
@@alf-erikritsland1051 You are confusing Psychopathy with Sociopathy. Most do, don't feel bad.
The last DSM has re-structured the hierarchy of psychological conditions/disorders lately by a lot. E.g. there's no Asperger's anymore, now it's a form of autism. Psychopathy being put under ASPD is another change. It's a valid inquiry as to why JP seemingly uses dated terminology
I wouldn't use labels to discredit someone. Sometimes someone that isn't a major for instance can still be correct. Not that I believe this is the case here I do stand by the idea that Jordan is right, but I see it more as one did more research and spent more time on practicing the field than the other. Destiny cannot fact check that at the moment so he chose to believe it because he has no reference to go back on.
@@alf-erikritsland1051🤦♂️
JP's verbal arsenal never ceases to amaze me. The man wields words like both an artist and a surgically precise professional.
If only Hitchen’s were still alive, and available to debate Peterson. It would be an ear orgasm.
You mean verbal diarrhoea.
@@timmothyjenningsrip Hitchens though.
And he is also very manipulative at times. His “arsenal” is confused for competence every time he opens his mouth, which is deceitful.
There were major falsehoods with points he made in this clip, but he speaks so convincingly- people assume he is correct and being factual. He is legit, at times. But also very sneaky and has become a total narcissist over the last few years. A shame.
I disagree, he has evolved into a more secure speaker, and someone who has faced endless nonsense.@@BB-fo5mr
Imagine arguing with a metallurgist about the properties of Iron when your experience is playing with crayons.
That’s Destiny in this clip.
That's Destiny all the time.
LOL... Perfect analogy
Thats destiny period
@@Jimminityjabooboo Yes, he's an insufferable twat.
He’s not behaving normally Insecure
It's so annoying that this guy is interrupting Jordan every 2 seconds
Jordan likes those ppl to show off how his public hero persona is built. Most of his memorable interviews that get him high price tickets for his talks, tend to have this planned dramatic energy.
I imagine this is what it's like talking to any internet armchair savante who thinks they know what they're talking about.
Exactly!
I'm 90 seconds in and there's so much contention that it's hard to watch. Yep, he just called him disagreeable as I type, which I was just thinking.
@@TrueWalker88he's just logical and calls people out.
I’ve seen a total of maybe 3 mins of destiny talking so far in my entire life. And that’s more than enough for me.
Watch more
@@randomhuman2595only if it’s JP lecturing the shit out of him again
I've watched him with several interviewers. Destiny crawls under my skin in every single one. Bad vibes.
@@patrickbarrett1220 It was a great discussion two smart minds
Good go back to your echo chamber.
Destiny is so overwhelmingly
out of his depth it’s embarrassing.
He’s doesn’t realise that Koran is telling him that he has all the personality traits to become a psychopath and he’s just trying to prove his own dumb ideology
But he, my man Destiny, talks fast and moves his arms around a lot along with his fingers making funny shapes and he has weird off topic responses like a boss.
Well that’s most people.
LOL, do you have anything to say ?
On what point?
Imagine telling a psychologist he might be right about psychological nomenclature. This Destiny kid needs to switch to decaf and understand who he is talking to.
Destiny thinking in his head 100% - if i remotly agreed with jordan even though i know he is speaking better then me and speaking facts after facts so clearly, but if i agreed with him and admitted submission, I'LL LOOSE MY PERCEIVED REPUTATION. 😂. Somebody needs to tell this blue haired wannabe you are already lost. Nobody ever comes out alive fighting TRUTH with lies. Honest JP followers knows that too well. Destiny is the definition of my generation that wants to seed chaos, you know, very relatable to the joker from batman mentality, some people wants to watch the world burn just for drama. They don't care about money, destiny a year ago said it clearly he already has few millions in bank now he just wants to enjoy drama cause he is safe from being cancelled anyway. Disgusting losser
When people insult me online, I imagine someone a lot like Destiny sitting there behind the screen.
😅 yes. And they rock back and forth when they hear "Trump".
The actual reason I try to avoid insulting people online.
Absolutely 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@TonicofSonic ... breathing through their mouths, slightly drooling from one corner... 🤣🍻
Less of a debate, more of a lesson
?!?!?!?! its both you clown
thats why Destiny is taking notes
Jordan proved to be mostly all insecurity and narcissism in this. He can't engage with destiny in any honest manner. he is in total "I'M THE SMART MONKEY TEACHER I KNOW MORE YOU DON'T SCARE ME". Peterson was like that the entire time. Dude is a total fucking clown who got the intellectual fucking crap beat out of him by Matt Dillahunty.
@@lifeofliam2164 Destiny takes notes hoping for "gotcha" moments as well I suspect. His primary motivation isn't towards truth, but to be right/prove the opposition wrong.
@@RansomMemoryAccessthat's actually the same thing 😂 read what you're saying
Don't you just love it when an interviewer attempts to show off in front of Peterson and gets schooled.
He is not an interviewer, both of them had a debate.
And also it was Destiny who was asking here.
"What Is your view on xyz"
What do you believe here
What is this...
He was trying to ask questions to understand his position. Where did you get the vibe he was showing off?
god i understand why people hate Peterson so much now. This interpretation is so ridiculously funny. A lot of parallels to the "XYZ OWNED/DESTROYED THIS PERSON" right wing crowd. Lost in Narratives you are making up in your head.
Destiny neurotically asks a leading question, Jordan expertly breaks it down while Destiny ( not listening and fidgeting constantly) then tries to disengage with a follow up question about a completely different scenario.. and repeat
No, he re-engage with the topic prior that led them to this topic. This is why clips suck.
Do all these people in the comments have Traumatic Brain Injury or is this some massive PSYOP? Like did we even watch the same video? All I see is Destiny asking questions and constantly conceding
@@unh0lys0da16 They're having a civilized conversation but somehow JP fans are fuming at the comments at how JP DESTROYED him. Kinda weird.
@@MrFinnishbasterd Because Destiny tried very hard to make it uncivil JP just never fell into the traps.
@@GodwynDi What when? what the fuck are you talking about? Is the JP fanbase autistic or something?
Adderall will be the downfall of Destiny.
Couldn't agree more. At least you could spot it.
Is that what I've been seeing with his jaw and tiks?
He looks like a junkie
I think farming out his wife to other men was probably a bigger issue.
Is not Adderall is meth
7:31 "Narcissism is the desire for unearned social status."
Beautifully and succinctly stated.
I don’t know about that.
Psychopathy is to crave (or merely acquiesce) to be part of a social hierarchy (ANY social structure, on any rung of the ladder, for that matter) that is, in itself, an embodiment of criminal insanity. This world is a cosmic prison for criminally insane. It has to be, there’s no other way of explaining it.
@@claudiamanta1943 This is unintelligible.
You are saying psychopathy is to desire to be a part of a criminally insane social hierarchy? Meaning psychopathy means to want to be a part of a preconceived group comprised of psychopaths, this is self referential and meaningless. You need to ground yourself man, drink some tea look at nature for a while.
@claudiamanta1943 what?? That is.....uh....some wild thinking
Enjoyed this exchange between JP and Adderall + wikipedia
BAHAHAHA seriously!
I can easily imagine this Destiny guy in shabby clothing talking animatedly to himself on a streetcorner somewhere
@@claraallen12ok that makes sense why his jaw always looks like hes geeking/clenching his teeth
also reddit
If you enjoyed it why shit on it?
Would you rather watch them scream at each other?
I think this young man should book a few more sessions with doctor Peterson .
😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Destiny is ✡️✡️ i think he is even ahead of jp in terms of… the game”
😆 🎯
Brilliant!!😅
Destiny is not qualified for a debate with Peterson.
He's not qualified to debate anyone.
Far more qualified than you think, half of JP responses was him pivoting or dodging the question with some philosophical statement hahaha
Anybody is qualified to have a debate with anybody, the point of a debate is to expand your horizon on certain subjects.
Imagine trying to tell an accomplished professor of psychology what basic psychology terms mean and getting it wrong.
As if psychologists could agree what their terms mean...
Hes not a professor anymore, he got radiated and hes now a conspiracy lunatic.
If i look up the definition its a bit more complex than what JP said here. Honestly his definition is so vague anyone and my dog qualifies as a psychopath....
@@Chaelsonen Destiny talking about climate change using wlklpedla knowledge is not intelligent 😂😂 destiny has no clue what the actual data shows. JP called him out on this
@@brockcharz2104 you heard people bringing up how JP is a professor of psychology, and the questioning of psychology terms and thought "they must be talking about climate change" ?
Crazy how fast Peterson figured out Destiny...
Not to brag...but I figured out destiny in the 1st 4 minutes of seeing him a few years ago....
I don't need a psychology degree to determine arrogant, narcissism and drug induced delusions.....
Destiny is the same as one of my siblings....he believes that speaking loud, fast, and aggressively makes whatever he says correct whether it's correct or not.
Brutal. I loathe this guy to the same degree that I loathe Hitler.
and Destiny's fanbase is still defending him in the comments at every chance on the video, it must have really hit home to them
@@Brainjoy01that's because thr left is a cult.
@@Brainjoy01 Fools following the fool.
Not so crazy. JP has been a working psychotherapist long enough to figure these sorts of people out pretty quickly.
It was nice of Jordan to film this psychopath's therapy session for all of us to watch.
Dr. Peterson is not only extremely intelligent but has a genuinely good heart.
Yeah, I think he means well. So I can't fully blame him since his past interactions with far lefties.
Do you know him personally?
And so very patient/tolerant…
He would have to have a good heart just to refrain from puncturing Destiny's fragile bubble of drug-induced omnipotence.
Very good heart -- calls to give hell people that half are children. He is smart, but not good
Destiny trying to outsmart a clinical
psychologist, with more clinical experience than Destiny has been alive. Tells you essentially what you need to know.
The full debate was great. Don't be a psyoped idiot. They both conceded on multiple points in this full discussion. We should champion these debates.
@@reasonabledictator8993 This isn’t the full debate I was commenting on, I thought that was obvious. Maybe you need information handed to you in excess to understand someone else’s point. It’s also not the only debate I’ve watched of either of these folks. And you should already know insulting others isn’t going to win you any points.
I didn’t really get the feeling he was trying to outsmart him though. He was just pointing at possible holes in Peterson’s logic. That’s like the point of a debate. And it made for a super interesting conversation. I don’t really know why your making it sound like destiny was being an ass
@@isaacmurphy6703 Yes it was interesting. But clearly it was more than just pointing out holes in his logic. It becomes even more pronounced when you look at his other debates.
What made you think that he's trying to outsmart JP?
Jordan has gotten savage, the "quite disagreeable, like you for instance" comment killed me hahaha
Like any male, Peterson is trying to establish his dominance by framing the discussion in terms of psychology because he is the expert.
@@claudiamanta1943 This is just stupid. Disagreeable is in common parlance. It isn't a show of dominance to use your expertise in conversations, especially when you were the one to stumble into their ring. Do you get angry at an electrician for explaining what your breaker box does? You look at life through painted glasses.
@@claudiamanta1943The topic is about psychopathy. Seems reasonable to frame it in psychology. But I don’t want to mansplain.
@@TDashem As a male I love mansplaining. Hell, I'll settle for any explainings.
…..and shortly after Jordan explains, Destiny says yes, I agree with that. As if to say, see, I am not disagreeable. 🙄
This feels like when i was 8 and i am asking my dad about the world and he says all the things that are true objectively that i don't like to hear and then i get grumpy at him.
😂😂😂😂😂😂. Right on lol
Another comparison is when you talk to a child who thinks she's the smartest person in the room, but she's really only just a precocious child.
Sure, she's smart & clever for her age, and she's ambitious, and maybe she'll actually become someone who has non-childish ideas, but her confidence and ego actually stop her from learning.
Must be nice to have a dad
@@AD-wg8ik Are we supposed to feel guilty for having a dad? What a jackass as comment. I had a Dad. He died at 46 when I was 17. Your comment screams poor me, and you should feel bad because you had a Dad and I didn't. Sounds like something someone highly manipulative would say. Must be nice lol, anyone who starts with that is showing resentment
Destiny along with the rest of his soya boy generation,they're all a bunch of narcissists self-absorbed brats! May Jesus have mercy on Judgment Day🙏
Jordan Peterson's ability to explain these topics to laypeople is extraordinary.
It's not extrodinary, cause he doesn't know what he's talking about. If you want to actually learn about psychopaths read The Psychopath by Mary Turner Thompson and/or The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson.
@@eddardstark5034lmao okay game of thrones geek
But why is everybody hating the other guy? Who is he?
He seems pretty intelligent to me, although I know nothing about his personality.
@@herrbonk3635 Destiny (aka Steven) is a political streamer. He’s moderate left. He’s very intelligent but he’s used to debating pseudo-intellectuals who he can out talk. He has a machine gun style of debate where he bombards the other side with bullets until they can’t take it anymore. Jordan Peterson is an actual intellectual so that style of debate was ineffective. JP can take it and throw it back to him easily. He took control of the debate methodically and clearly had better strategy. He also used all of Steven’s flaws against him. He consistently cornered him and let him talk his way off the ledge. Steven was out of his depth on this one.
@V3ryW3LL lmao that's rich coming from some dork who can't spell very well. The 90's called, they wanted you to know that L33t was in fact always stupid.
It seems Destiny needed to talk to a counselor for quite a long time, thank you Dr. Jordan Peterson, I think Destiny grew with this interaction. Peace.🤞🙏🏻🖖
The guy is literally asking for definitions from a psychologist, and when he hears them he says "maybe that might be true".
Right !!
I see this criticism too much. He uses open language all the time, like how he says "I feel like" rather than "this is this way I know it" type language.
@@GalaxyGeassS2 It's an apt criticism. It's bad to overuse hedging, and Destiny does it way too much. Especially for how arrogantly he stands by his opinions. If all you use is fuzzy words you yourself become fuzzy. This is useful to obfuscate yourself from potential attackers, which is a cowardly tactic for someone as aggressive as Destiny. This is fundamentally because Destiny values optics over integrity, in my opinion. ⬅(reasonable hedging in practice)
Im going to rewrite my comment while overusing hedging, so you can see what it looks like.
I think that it's a somewhat reasonable criticism. It probably isn't good to overuse hedging, and Destiny possibly does it a bit too much. Especially for how arrogantly I feel that he stands by his opinions. If all you use is fuzzy words you could feasibly become fuzzy yourself. This might be useful to obfuscate yourself from potential attackers, which could be a cowardly tactic for someone who seems aggressive as Destiny. This is assumedly because Destiny probably values optics over integrity, in my opinion. ⬅(way too much hedging)
You can see how the second example is much weaker.
@@Tryin2Bnice45 Health professionals don't tend to use the diagnostic terminology in their every day talks with people outside of the profession. And Jordan isn't wrong for using it, quite frankly it's more helpful to have a low resolution model for most people who don't read up on medical journals.
But if you have watched any current practicing therapist and psychologist who talk about their profession and they have gone over psychopathy in the last 5 years. They still use it, but I can't remember the last time I saw someone mention the word and not come with the disclaimer that psychopathy is technically still no longer being used as a diagnosis, and is now put under the ASPD umbrella when they retired DSM-5. Having followed Destiny for a bit, I'm sure that is how he has heard it described before he then read up on what they were citing or when he can he'll just ask people he knows who's job it is to know these things. But he's was obviously not going to waste time trying to get into the weeds of arguing about it the way Jordan and Sam got stuck on what the word truth meant. Something Destiny knew could be a possibility going in and wanted to avoid it at all cost, so the OG post is actually silly.
The mistake I see so many people here make is that they treat this clip and their interaction as if it's a zero sum game. Like Jordan's recent conversation with Alex if you had actually seen them talk about it before hand you would know they went on his show. Because there are things that he's said they genuinely wanted some clarifications on but haven't actually gotten to that point. Since so many people who have tried to talk to him about it would do one of two things. Either be hostile because they are so stupid they can't tell the difference between Jordan and Tate. Or they don't really challenge him on when he goes around the question. The talks and their goals were different but I think Alex did a better job than Destiny. Jordan still danced around certain subjects for reasons I don't understand, but for once Jordan would actually steelman the person asking the question and give additonal clarifying examples where I for the first time finally got the sense that Jordan doesn't dance around it because he wants to be able to flirt and dogwhistle to certain subsections of the audience to use his answers as scapegoats.
For instance when they went into the example about how if Jordan was a witness to a crime, he wouldn't afterwards tell the cops interviewing him who asked him what he saw "what do you mean by see exactly?"
@@dcworld4349he gave a subjective answer. Diagnostic criteria are very easy to understand.
Destiny should do a two hour podcast with Dr.Peterson once a week for a few years, and have his meds reassessed.
Why do you think he should stop with his meds? It seems like it has helped him since he began
@@Watedude is tweaking big time
@@crazychase98 nah, he's always had these mannerisms
@@Wateyeah because of the meds
Psychologists to prescribe medicine though so that would be wholly inappropriate for him to do.
JP handles himself so well. When the interviewer interjects, it feels insecure. In my humble opinion. Great conversation. Thank you !
I feel like destiny is low-key asking if he is a psychopath and Jordan Peterson is low-key saying… Maybe…
😂💀
He sed - You going in that way. Gona end up there :) Like in the line already crossed, but whit one foot.
@alexadao8852 you think Destiny is part of the tribal left? I very much doubt that.
@@alf-erikritsland1051 he obviously is....
LOL!!!!!
I knew this was gonna turn into a therapy session real quick for Destiny. That "withholding s*x" question didn't come out of nowhere.
Definitely a projection
Right ??? It was like he was looking for free advice...LOL
Jp seem like the one that need therapy lol
Lol why @@OdinWannaBe
@@redrumax I used to play rust onthe same server as destiny and from the interactions I had with him in that game there is something seriously wrong with him. He is like some type of energy vampire that feeds off groups of insecure idiots.
Why does he keep interrupting his guest? It's great that JP dissected him right then and there.
Gossip for your gain is exactly what he described. Short term gratification at the expense of relationship
Sometimes we do it to vent. We have a man at the office who talks over people and is sometimes a bit touchy to women.
When we go out for drinks after work, he occasionally comes up in conversation where people will talk about what he did.
It is gossip and joking but its for them to vent their frustration (100 percent no evil intent)
@@leigh7507 Yeah I would argue that it is a short term Band-Aid. You still have to deal with him tomorrow and the next day. I would think someone talking over people to the point where no one can get a word in and are afraid to even stand up for their case, their truth would make the environment worse. I had that at my old job with the manager. Guy thinks his anger and strictness is power but it really is his weakness. It was one reason I left that company. You eventually start to lose the ones who bring real value because they can be somewhere else. I do think if you have to deal with that for a time to get something better in the end, it would be a small sacrifice.
I guess what I am saying is, that can be a problem in the long term but whether you have to worry or not about it I would think depends on your own goals. I chose not to deal with it because long term, it fucked my mental health up bad where I was more happy jobless than working there full time. With annoying customers however, it was more dealing with that for a small amount of time so it really wasn't anything to care about since it will happen once in a while and most likely they won't last as employees or business owners if they are too into their toxic ways.
@@leigh7507 yeah that's not the same thing.
You're rationalizing bad behaviour or severely misinformed.
Gossip is intended to be disparge someone's reputation for no real gain.
Venting is intended to help with emotional dysregulation or trauma.
Most people aren't venting when gossiping, they are spreading rumours, half truths and do so intentionally to spite another human. Narcissistic as hell and liable to leave you alone near the end of your life and just as spiteful with no respite
Destiny be like, hey im not a psycopath right!? Jordan be like um, if you say so Bucko
Even if JP thought he was, he would never call it out. Anyone that has studied and truly understands psychopaths and narcissists knows that the one thing you never do under any circumstances is call them out.
@@Jwareness wrong,you carefully call them out and draw a line they don’t cross and if they do cross it they know the outcome exposes them.They soon scoot off to find another victim.
@@KingFinkyStingers That could only work with one which is self-aware, which is rare, and even then it will still often end up backfiring on you. It's simply never advisable to call them out. All the top psychologists who specialize in these personality traits will tell you the same thing.
Nah it be destiny trying to prove he is not a cuck.
If you had a longer attention capable of watching the full conversation, you'd probably agree with Destiny on the full argument.
Destiny trying to go toe to toe with Peterson is actually HILARIOUS. The best part is he has no idea how much of an ass he made of himself
Jordan Peterson decides to wear his Joker suit when talking to Destiny. Entirely appropriate.
I wonder if either of them realize the irony of Destiny talking about psychopaths. The guy gives me the fucking creeps.
He's a cheerful, positive-seeming sophist to some extent. I've tangled with worse. When it comes to love and marriage? I don't know, he's crazy.
I thought he was a normie
I agree with your assessment. Something about him is off.
@@TeaRikerWrong. Destiny is weird as hell.
If you know mbti jordan is ENTJ and destiny seems Entp they’re twinflame opposite they conflict over morality ( jordan ) / ideology ( destiny)
Ideological people are idealistic and naive and think in black and white and they are goofy and trollish they are okay with the far left ideologies ( communism) they seek a government to completely take control over their lives and feed them so they could live whimsically like children because they lack accountability and responsibility in their minds they think once another ideological leader be in command he will “ save them “ because he will promise them total utopia or fairness or spare them the strain of work which is never the case its always about shifting power in his/her hand and a total grip on the state also to force people to view reality in the tunnel vision that psychopath leader wish to enforce it on them , these people are psychologically immature in all of their decisions they usually will pick people that are close to their nature
I like how he said "hey bud you're knocking on the door of being a piece of shit" really delicately
Why in the world did destiny even think he was smart enough to pontificate on youtube in the first place lol
I like how a person who is literally an expert in the field that has both cited papers and has not only taught undergraduates but people working ion their own masters and phd theists has this guy trying to correct him or saying I agree as though he was in any position to validate what is being told to him.
Peterson is a psychopath. He has lost his mind and they are going to take his license away. He is a failure and a disgrace and he wears ugly clothes too what a strange person.
He is perfectly within his rights to agree or disagree. Never accept an argument from authority. Even very accomplished people can be wrong, especially in the heat of a discussion.
@@HolyMithvery true
@@HolyMiththey did say in 2020 to trust the science
@@HolyMithhe'd be within his rights if he had actual data to back his arguments. He doesn't. He's just saying his feelings or misunderstandings.
JP is a very patient man 😂
Clinical psychologists are very patient ... it's their profession.
lol
Wisdom earned
perhaps he's just used to talking with verbally-reactive children??
Jordan Peterson is at his best debating people who challenge him.
Thank God for people like that.
It’s amazing that a gamer/influencer is attempting to argue psychopathy with one of the most renowned psychologists today.
😂😂😂Peterson a renowned psychologist?! Don't confuse actual academic work with writing some half-baked pseudoscientific literature. This guy is a (pretty bad) joke.
@@karlnonnenfutter7726you realize you are talking about a former professor of Harvard’s school of psychology? 🤦🏾♂️
@@karlnonnenfutter7726and just out of curiosity, which of his actual academic work do you know or have you read?
The last DSM has re-structured the hierarchy of psychological conditions/disorders lately by a lot. E.g. there's no Asperger's anymore, now it's a form of autism. Psychopathy being put under ASPD is another change. It's a valid inquiry as to why JP seemingly uses dated terminology
@@rokoi3 why not use your curiosity for something better maybe let’s hope you become a Harvard professor some day
Narcissism is the desire for unearned social status.....
Fascinating 🖖🏼
Thats a symptom. Root causation for NPD is a completely ignored child who realizes that they are only going to be valid if they make everything about themself and minimize anything and everything about everyone else.
And I stole my reply from somewhere in my reserch on NPD. I wasn’t attempting to make it ALL ABOUT ME. 😎
Fun fact: this desire is from a false self the Narcissist created to cope with the external world because when comes the phase the child separates from the external object, specially his mother, he experiences trauma, usually from parents or family but could be anyone so they don’t even have a true self, therefore they don’t have ego nor superego.
@@ThiagoSFFranco ? youre spewing bs, narcissists absolutely have an ego, the ego is just how we see ourselves, that would essentially mean you don't think they are sentient...
@@Aryzo you can call it bs, it is not up to me to debate with you the meaning of the word "ego" but it seems you only know one but there you go...
e·go
/ˈēɡō/
noun
a person's sense of self-esteem or self-importance.
"a boost to my ego"
PHILOSOPHY
(in metaphysics) a conscious thinking subject.
***PSYCHOANALYSIS***
the part of the mind that mediates *between the conscious and the unconscious* and is *responsible for reality testing* and a *sense* of *personal identity*.
I am obviously referring to the Psychoanalysis meaning and that dictionary definitions explains what my comment ment.
If you like to research and to learn more about these topics, specially Narcissism, please, I suggest you learn first hand from a diagnosed one who is hugely acknowledged worldwide and works at educating people to *deal* with Narcissists, Psychos, Borderlines and many other Personality Disorders (specially, Cluster B though), *Professor Sam Vaknin*.
He is at the forefront for raising awareness and knowledge over Narcissistic Abuse and how to prevent it or to cope for those who were unfortunate to being through it already.
So, you can either spend hours studying Vaknin's material like video channels, articles, books, crosscheck with other references (many he refers to himself either when he agrees or disagrees but always explains minutely why) and either learn something that changes your perspective or, you could continue to call it bs as well, whatever but, what you cannot or should not do is to call bs on matters you don't know enough about, even the meaning of the word you got wrong, but you know what? That is ok! There is always room for improvement if we make it. Remember that there is always something you don't know yet and keep your "ego" (now as the self-importance sense) in check.
Destiny realizing he’s a psychopath. Thank you Dr. Peterson.
The subject of psychology is THE subject for Jordan Peterson. I think he has a very deep understanding of human behavior and archetype, and I wish he engaged more in these types of conversations.
That was beautiful to watch, Jordan's patience and intelligence is incredible
This was a really interesting conversation to listen to.he fact that some people can't view it without saying "Wow, Jordan DESTROYED Destiny" or "Destiny DEBUNKED this loon!" is disheartening.
This is the Jordan Peterson of old. Fantastic seeing him again
it would be great if he went back to the game that made him famous.
And basically anyone who blindly excepts destiny’s psychology is a psychopath
Doesn’t that go for anything in this world?
accepts*
@@KaraokeNigFeel better?
@@racegrubb2152I do🙃
But a psychopath wouldn't.
Jordan Peterson literally gave you the definition of a Psychopath and you got it wrong lol. If you blindly accept anyone's opinion, you're an idiot, not a psychopath because you aren't doing it for your own benefit at the expense of others
How much Adderol did Destiny slam before entering into this discussion? Holy Lord!
Meth will do that to ya
8ball
@@crazychase98it’s not meth my doctor gave it to me it’s different stop ur hurting my feelings 😂😂😂
@@jooosAREevilyeah cause someone in a white jacket wrote it down on a piece of paper it’s somehow medicine now and not meth🤪
@@carramrod8232 my doctor said to boof my addys .. is boof a medical term I didn’t understand
I'm glad for this because all of people who follow Destiny will have all this new information to process. It's a win for everyone here.
Absolutely the most humorous "debate" I've ever watched in my life
This interview was one of the most amazing things I have witnessed, Destiny laid out his motivations, and almost told us that he could no longer be taken as someone who is misguided and still seeks truth, he just fell off the paid shill cliff. It was a masterful performance by Jordan Peterson, I’ve never seen anything like it.
Please elaborate
Destiny seems to want to find a line between psychopathy and non-psychopathy, and between force and not-force. In reality, people won't agree on where that line is. We *might* be able to agree to the extremes.
I think this is true of many (most?) things that aren't an atomic construction of parts, but a pattern that is recognized. I.e. where do you draw the line between a chair and a non-chair? That kind of thing...
Jordan Peterson is such an incredibly intelligent man. I enjoy hearing him talk, I feel like I learn how to be a better & more understanding person each time.
JP has been studying, writing, and teaching about Anti Social behavior at the absolute highest level for decades. Imagine trying to correct him on that topic.
Now that's a good one! "Highest level"? "For decades?" Omg, please get educated.
What a male simp
There's a recent study I heard about recently that said that 10 male psychopaths to 1 female psychopath is not accurate, that it's actually 1.2 male psychopaths to 1 female psychopaths. Which would probably nearly double the amount of psychopaths in the world. Considering the number of psychopaths in society was pegged at between 4 to 6 percent... probably mean psychopaths are around 10 percent!
The amount of psychopaths changes depending on wether or not there is social unrest.
They increase when society allows them to exist, basically. So the amount of psychopaths increasing among women should tell you something
Even within psychopaths most prolly dont act out in a way that will shed themselves in the light. Like murder
Less so in women
Jordan peterson has said that social media has acted as a catalyst and enablement of online forms of psychopath. With the majority of it's users being female if I'm not mistaken, then naturally female psychopathology would rise as a consequence
Is that study made with biological females ? or includes trans ones?
@@S_Nicky lol.... seems like a dumb question, but nowadays you never really know do you 😁
Here is the value I extracted from the interaction:
There's a tetrad of traits:
Narcissism - Desire for unearned social status
Machiavellianism - Propensity to manipulate, degree of manipulativeness
Psychopathy - Parasitism that is predatory in nature
Sadism - The result of obtaining gratification employing the methods derived from the prior three traits.
"If the aftermath of disagreement can be tilted in the direction of those traits, that's when the intention becomes malevolent and the problem of force becomes paramount".
This perspective elucidates the underlying complexities resulting from disagreements with intrinsically malevolent motivations present.
I see the interaction as a logical mechanism for identifying malevolent intent within a high emotion disagreement.
....Knibb High Football RULES!!!
When you start your sentence with "I feel like..." that tells me you are absolutely unconvinced about what you think.
Exactly, it's called having a discussion and being open minded. Not being a absolutely sure zealot. Is that what you want in the world? for everyone to be convinced of any thing they have come to conclusion of first, without question?
@@GalaxyGeassS2 No, those are different things. What he is doing is called hedging which is just a method of saving face if you are proven wrong. It can be useful if your ego wouldn't normally allow you to change opinions. You instead never make concrete statements of opinion so you never need to own up to the fact that you can in fact be wrong and so never confront your ego.
In the security business we were taught that the first level of force was verbal persuasion. I disagreed. I believe the first level of force is nonverbal persuasion. In any case I find it interesting that force does not always have to be physical.
It doesn’t have to be physical. It can be a threat of inducing physical force.
Its really a matter of what the (en)forcer thinks will be the most effective route initially, within the bounds of the circumstance.
Its not necessarily/definitively either. Dependent on the person and the circumstance.
In normative, legal and active use of force the verbal level is the first one because you need to protect yourself about litigious individuals and institutions.
But if it's not physical, it becomes highly subjective and the term loses meaning. How about we just use a different word?
The first defense of an animal is its roar, it escalates from there.
The interviewer is an ADHD freak. JP handles himself with poise. He is a master of control. A master of human psychology.
Adderall addict or meth
The first thing Destiny said after hearing that being unagreable was related to psychopathy was "I agree."
Just because someone says they are an expert in something doesn’t mean everything they say is correct. He could’ve disagreed with something JP said and JP could’ve interjected with statements of clarity for the sake of clearing up misunderstandings. I can disagree with a doctors assessment or diagnosis and go to a second opinion. Experts aren’t always right. Look at the beginning of the pandemic and how Experts were trying to figure it out. It wasn’t until later that we got the real answers.
🤣
Disagreeableness Is just one of the traits in the big 5 personality model. It's only related to psychopathy in so far that being a man is related to psychopathy.
@@ShmoeBoe Its in the disagreeable qualities and traits that links it to psychopathy. I'm a clinical psychologist.
@@andreiadetavora8471 I'm not sure what you are saying? I'm saying that being disagreeable does not make you a psychopath. I'm not disagreeing that the disagreeable trait is necessary for psychopathy. Like how putting wheels on grandma doesn't make her a car.
Peterson is just so clear and strong and mature, and a deep intellect. The guy on the right side of the screen comes off like kind of an irritating. inexperienced high school kid. This was a dramatic mismatch. Can't give it a thumbs up...sorry.
Yea hes sitting with a man child
This
You watch the whole conversation?
@@hal_0017 dgg much?
@@Macheako say what?
I have listen to Destiny speaking for less than 5 minutes total and I can clearly tell he has no idea at all the difference between right and wrong. he thinks that gossiping about someone is not necessarily so bad if he simply doesn't care about the person he's gossiping about. in a way I'd actually say that makes it worse..
Holy cow. Destiny needs to shut up and listen. Like the Woke generally he knows a little about many things (enough to be absolutely wrong, for the most part) and generally unwilling to move beyond his ignorance.
Yeah... we haven't watched the same debate buddy. Both of these guys were respectful trough the conversation. And destiny even though he disagreed took the time to understand jordans arguments before saying what he thinks. To be fair he was right when he said that people care less about the debate itself then making their side seem educated and calm and opponents unhinged and insane. The more I watch destiny ben Shapiro and Jordan the more I hate extremes like hasan, matt walsh and other divisive extremist psychos.
Lol. Ok. I think I won't engage in discussion with someone that calls himself "@@demolisher-ng1dh ." But thanks for coming out to play.
Still open to comments from any non-Trolls or non-Perverts, folks.
i agree pussydemolisher
As someone who usually can't stand listening to Mr. Peterson talk about subjects like philosophy and religion. I always find it a great pleasure to hear him talk about psychology, he's really a great deal more concise, articulate, knowledgeable and engaging as a speaker on the subject.
When you hear him talk about religion one is often left with the impression he doesn't know where it's going, that he has finished formulating the thought yet.
I feel like you must either have a distain of religion or a lack of interest for theology to have this opinion. His theological content is some of the most insightful content I have ever consumed.
This wasn't an interview it was a remedial education for the interviewer .
Love Peterson because he will engage a clown like this guy - and still teach things with elegance
1:19 ‘maybe that may be true’ the streamer said to the psychologist while discussing mental illness
"I'm right, I'm right, I'm right, right right right right right right .. 😡
Destiny acting like he knows more than the licensed therapist is the funniest thing
Funny how Destiny brought a notepad like a prop to make him feel like he wasn’t the one being psychoanalyzed
I'm a JP fan but you're making an argument from authority. That's like saying "Why didn't everyone get the vacs? Do they think they know more than actual doctors??"
All of JP's fan boys using big words they don't understand is even more hilarious
Fanboys on both sides
@@littlewigglemonster7691 Who are you even talking about? Me? So are the words "licensed" and "therapist" supposed to be words that are too big to understand now? What are you, five years old? Even if you were talking about the other comment using the word "psychoanalyzed", that's a common word used in college. I swear we need an age limit for some types of videos since kids like you can barely even read.
Ive a doctorate in psychopathy. The only thing that links obesity to psychopathy would be poor impulse control. However thats not enough to claim someone meets the criteria. The mistake many make is to infer that someone haivng a few traits means a person meets the criteria for the disorder. Thats because most dont know the items that make up the disorder can exist on their own. Whats interesting about this conversation is Joran is basically pointing out to him that he may have some of the traits. What is weird however is him writing some of what Jordan says down as if he is wanting to use this info in a debate.
There is misconception that psychopathy involves impulse. There are very few real world examples that form good case studies that can accurately be used as reference. One trait that does tend to be central to psychopathy is deceit. The term also gets improperly used to describe people that do have impulse control issues that descend into violent rage. Crimes of passion also get lumped into psychopathy.
@@Art-is-craftnone of that is true. Impulsivity is right there in the PCL-R. Deceit isnt. Crimes of passion also is nonsense. Clinical Psychopathy is assessed using the PCL-R, it appears you are unfamiliar with it.
@@harryhill8543
You do not think psychopathy has deceit?
So you think at the worst manifestation’s there is no guarding behaviours. The vast majority of people that are psychopaths all practice deceit at a central level. It is part of their very being and it is very thing that allows them to operate. Other behaviours include lack of empathy.
@@Art-is-craftpsychopathy is what is measured by the PCL-R. That is the accepted clinical model. You are simply using words that you think fits with the description of what you think a psychopath is. It never fails when a psychopathy video appears on youtube that people claiming expertise on the matter pipe up with nonsense opinions which simply flags up to people who actually do the research that they know nothing and are generally informed by crappy fiction. Also "lack of empathy" isnt even a behaviour lol. "The vast majority of people that are psychopaths all practice deceit at a central level", is this copied directly from a bad true crime novel or is it a B movie?
Must be a rare doctorate.
I’ve heard of doctorates in psychopathology.
Destiny "maybe that might be true" says the gamer to a psychologist...hilarious.
Peterson is absolutely amazing
Lol Destiny projects and lowkey gets called a Psychopath. Beautiful.
Where did he get called a psychopath even low key? Being disagreeable does not make one a psychopath cornball.
No psychopaths in the video but plenty in the comments.
@@sroth2021I bet you have one of those smug faces people want to punch.
@@shelleycline3542 Destiny projects his behavior so when he said people will drop principles for short term gratification at the drop of a hat, he was talking for himself. Destiny has no principles. He constantly contradicts himself in order to win an arguement, so Jordan saying that behavior is psychopathic, he was talking about Destiny even if he didn't know it.
@@Kyle-2020can you give an example of a contradiction he's made recently?
Peterson is totally RIGHTS in What he said!
JP is just explaining definitions in what he has worked with in his field for decades and Destiny is trying to win some sort of imagined argument.
Or maybe his less specialized study is leading him to push for clarity. You probably don't get a lot of participation points in class huh
@@fsh_outta_wtr im a engineer but whatever
go away loser
@@fsh_outta_wtrsnarky
stupid
anime picture
yep it is a liberal😂
@abbemartensson3850 Anime??? This is just a drawing of a lady astronaut 😭
Nerdy ass name
Pseudo intellectual
Victim complex
Yup it's a conservative 😭🤣😭😅🤣🤣❣️🍆💦💦💦
Jordan is speaking in the terms of Forest Before the Tree's and when applicable Tree's before the Forest. Destiny is still trying to figure out what the tree and what the forest is.
I really dislike Destiny's passive-aggressiveness and the way he talks over Peterson. This is not an honest interview or even a discussion, he just wants to be right and likes his own voice. It's weird how some people who do this (talking to people) for a living are incredibly unsuited for it. All I hear is Destiny's annoyance that he has to do this and the hatred for the person he is interviewing. He feels incredibly biased and threatened that he doesn't have the room all for himself.
Destiny said he was skeptical of everything regarding the vaccines, climate change, etc. in this debate. He is the least skeptical person of anybody I can think of. Total conformist to everything except for wokeness.
To answer the question he wanted to ask: yes Destiny, yes you are a psychopath.
This guy wants to be right at all costs, it’s counterproductive, there is no deep thinking from his side, just noises to dominate the space, painful to watch. 😢
Any ‘man’ who dyes his hair blue is automatically barred from entering adult discussion in my book.
And calls themselves Destiny
@@Gettothegone exactly. I mean come on,are there actually people taking him seriously ?
“having my son” sounds like the sap had “sympathy pains” 🫰🏼fools and their money are soon parted.
What baffles me is what is the appeal of him or his ilk ? 💁🏼♂️
Skill issue
Change book
Mine too. In my experience in most cases they turn out to be uneducated, emotional, attention whores.
This is like watching a katana fight a wooden kitchen butterknife
Never have I heard anyone define psychopathy this way, I actually thought it didn’t make sense but thinking about it it holds up pretty well.
Thanks for informing this interviewer about his personality. Instantly he stopped being disagreeable. 😂
Being disagreeable doesn't mean that you disagree just for the sake of it.
What is hilarious is that P. was the interviewer. Guy looooves to hear the sound of his own voice.
It's like everyone forgets he's actually a psychologist
I wonder why that is
I like that Jordan brings up that this conversation is bringing forth negative emotions
Every time I hear Jordan Peterson I learn something. Before two weeks ago I didn’t know who Destiny was… now I feel dumber having heard him speak.
Dude, JP is a billionX smarter than you. Shut up and let him talk.
Thank you!!
- Godspeed
Jordan isn't very smart, he takes most of his ideas from other people and have almost no ideas from their own personal vision, on top of that he is easily offended, he can't handle notifications on X platform of people who don't agree with him, which is ridiculous given his old age and him supposedly been a grown man, an adult, he only got famous out of disagreeing with woke people, nothing special.
There were a couple of exchanges where Peterson calls Destiny out for quoting "studies" as proof of his position, and then proceeds to cite his own "peer-reviewed studies" as his evidence. Imagine being this young dude, going up against this incredibly smart and articulate man. He may be wrong (a lot), but much respect for his ability to interact with Peterson
The interviewer is so obviously uncomfortable with his constant foot tapping and fidgeting as if its impossible for him to sit still.
The beta got schooled
Destiny doesn't seem well.
They both seem unwell
Adderall destiny
@@adrianlekay7715💀
King NPC. He almost has the correct programming.
His name is Steven
Destiny does not seem genuinely interested in the questions he's asking--it's extremely funny and ironic that JP pointed out Destiny's disagreeableness, and how meta the conversation is, being that at the start it's mentioned that conversations between men are often, if not always, combative in a certain sense. Really, Destiny is always trying to 'win' the conversation, and this is why nothing that comes out of his mouth can be taken at face value. I'm not sure if he qualifies as a psychopath or not, and I don't think the 'truth' of such categorization matters, but man do I not like the dude.
Disagreeable nailed it.
Yea.. but he agreed to his girlfriend 'having fun' with someone else... loool