Omega Speedmaster 57 vs IWC Pilot vs Jaeger-LeCoultre Polaris

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024

Комментарии • 76

  • @AleksWatches
    @AleksWatches  Год назад +3

    Which one would you pick?

    • @SwissWatchGang
      @SwissWatchGang Год назад +5

      JLC dial texture, Omega's caseback and IWC's manly appeal :D

    • @MsFleshgear
      @MsFleshgear Год назад +3

      Jlc.

    • @KC-bv9kf
      @KC-bv9kf Год назад +2

      Lightly used Omega:)
      The JLC is creeping into Octo’s territory.

    • @FABM27
      @FABM27 2 месяца назад +1

      I tried this JLC today. Its a winner.

  • @DavidHammer83
    @DavidHammer83 Год назад +28

    Omega Speedy 57 is my favorite

  • @davidofglenbrook4487
    @davidofglenbrook4487 Год назад +15

    The JLC Polaris is my choice. A spectacular watch.

  • @gfxdaddy
    @gfxdaddy Год назад +14

    One thing the 57 has that the others don’t: the 3 O’clock register also functions as a dual time for travel; so you’re getting a traditional chrono AND a dual-time GMT.

    • @shunaalparwanda1567
      @shunaalparwanda1567 Год назад +1

      The 3 PM register is not a GMT function, its the minutes and hours times on a single register...

    • @gfxdaddy
      @gfxdaddy Год назад +2

      @@shunaalparwanda1567 Didn’t say it’s a GMT function, I said it can also function as dual time. Think about it: it’s a 12-hour and 60 minute register that functions independently. If you time it correctly, it can be used to track a second time zone. Time and Tide has a video with Omega where they discuss this.

    • @mikep197
      @mikep197 Год назад

      @@gfxdaddy and the jumping hour hand makes it even easier to use as a second time zone

  • @morgan97475
    @morgan97475 Год назад +13

    I'd have to go with the Omega.

  • @MsFleshgear
    @MsFleshgear Год назад +11

    The chronograph is significantly better with the JLC.

  • @waterfordrs22
    @waterfordrs22 Год назад +8

    I’d go with the Polaris any day if cost was no issue. Lots of depth to that dial, under 12mm if I heard correctly. I’ve grown bored with large watches, at 42mm, I’d typically look elsewhere. This and the Speedmaster Pro are exceptions. It’s simply stunning. JLC aren’t going to appeal to everyone, but their history is something anyone into watches would find interesting. The Polaris no date is something I’d very much like to try on, I see that as a very good alternative to an Explorer. There’s a Master Control Memovox that’s caught my eye.
    I own a Railmaster which I love. As a fan of Omega, the updated ‘57, for me that was the most improved watch of ‘22. The ‘57 is now the perfect compliment to all the Professionals Omega offers. The movement is stunning as well and completely it’s own thing too.
    The IWC, I’m not a fan of a 12,6&9 register layout. They integrated it well enough, but the dial simply comes off too busy. If I was more interested in that format, I’d probably love it.
    I don’t think the JLC is over priced, I believe the Omega is a good value, but I wouldn’t pay MSRP for either. I’d need to find’em pre owned at a solid value. Those kinds of dollars are outside my comfort zone.

    • @georgeii2629
      @georgeii2629 10 месяцев назад +1

      Exactly, the Polaris no date would also be my choice. Unfortunately I can't decide between the built and the black dial. What do you think?

    • @waterfordrs22
      @waterfordrs22 10 месяцев назад

      @@georgeii2629 JLC offers a great blue for that Polaris, that’s for sure. I know I could use of blue dial, however I seem to favor black, brown and gray dials. I wouldn’t overthink it. Going to see the watches and follow your instincts I think is what works for me.

    • @georgeii2629
      @georgeii2629 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@waterfordrs22 Thank you, my instinct says black. Have a nice Christmas Time!

    • @waterfordrs22
      @waterfordrs22 10 месяцев назад

      @@georgeii2629 no wrong choice there that’s for sure. Enjoy!

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад +11

    JLC FOR SURE!

  • @BenNS1971
    @BenNS1971 10 месяцев назад +2

    Omega, no doubt. That movement is phenomenal.

  • @juanperez5079
    @juanperez5079 Год назад +6

    The Omega 57 is the purest of these chronos. The others feel like they are wanting to be too much. The Polaris, for example ,is a grossly underrated world class diver. JLC, Is there really a need to make it a Chrono? Sometimes less really is more. As for value….all three miss the mark for my money.

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад

      Good insights! Thanks for sharing.

    • @waterfordrs22
      @waterfordrs22 Год назад

      It’s not as if the other Polaris offerings were taken away. At the end of the day, the Polaris is not their hardcore diver’s watch, it’s more of a utility player. The no date Polaris would be a great alternative to an Explorer for example.

  • @ilmostro16
    @ilmostro16 Год назад +5

    Not having a running seconds is a deal breaker for me on the JLC. The watch will always look dead.

  • @martinz5851
    @martinz5851 5 месяцев назад

    Which chronograph would you buy if all 3 are too expensive?

  • @leung9401
    @leung9401 3 месяца назад +2

    Omega, hands down.

  • @phughes4224
    @phughes4224 Год назад +2

    The JLC for me but in black which is more of a classic (less fashionable) colour, and because it's more rare.

  • @JimiTime1
    @JimiTime1 Год назад

    Great video! Good quality shots and I love the wrist shot angles.
    A few corrections, the JLC Polaris doesn’t have a screw down crown, my only complaint. I’ve owned it for almost 5 years, and it’s the best blue dial on the market IMHO.
    The IWC use 21MM lugs like the Polaris. I actually sold my pilot Chronograph due to the longer lug to lug

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +1

      Thanks for watching and the input! 🙏🏼

  • @Roy-vh9rp
    @Roy-vh9rp Год назад +1

    The Omega has the best shade of blue, in mine opinion. But why make manual wind movements with date?

  • @georgeii2629
    @georgeii2629 Год назад +1

    Really curious, I also had all 3 watches on the radar. And for me, too, they all fail because of the price. I'm leaning more towards the Zenith Pilot Chrono now, or even an even cheaper pilot's chrono from Longines or Hanhart.

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +1

      And they all get more and more expensive each year 🫣

  • @coffeeboyclips1973
    @coffeeboyclips1973 Год назад +5

    Iwc looks the best by a mile, then omega, JLC doesnt look good imo. Iwc will be my pick

    • @TwentyOne_Five
      @TwentyOne_Five Год назад +2

      The JLC looks ugly. Not a Polaris fan.

  • @_sr
    @_sr Год назад +1

    Thanks for this video. My favorite is omega. And with the inflation I think it is only natural that the prices go up. Unfortunately we are going to have to adjust as consumers

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +1

      Omega prices have been increased multiple times yearly before the inflation as well 😜

    • @DA-ju3iv
      @DA-ju3iv Год назад +1

      Nice video, I would have included Zenith but it’s not the point. Not only all brands are increasing prices ridiculously, they also pretend to be surprised when customers ask for discounts. “Oh we don’t offer discounts”. “Oh keep your watches then” is my answer. I’m listening to the most stupid things at ADs. No discounts on Omega, Zenith, IWC, Bulgari???? Really?? No discounts even on old pieces like Bulgari serpenti in steel and quarz movement! 😂 And this is because between 2020 and 2022 people kept on thinking watches are great investments and it’s worth to pay full price. No, they’re not. All brands are now trying to copy Rolex and AP practices. 3 years waiting lists on women’s models. Waiting lists on Zenith’s and Omega’s!!! 😂😂
      Truth is watches are liabilities with ever increasing maintenance costs and brands are disconnected with reality and what is just going to happen with the economy.

  • @davidowen2859
    @davidowen2859 Год назад +1

    Fortunate enough that money doesn't come into it. Pure looks has to be the Omega but like the heritage and your comments about how the JLC wears. Looking for next watch so will have to try both.

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад

      Hope the video was helpful!

    • @davidowen2859
      @davidowen2859 Год назад +1

      @@AleksWatches Yes very helpful and measured, thanks.

  • @vincentschneuwly9783
    @vincentschneuwly9783 Год назад +1

    Awesome matchup 👍to me the JLC had the potential to be among the best contenders on the whole matket but has two flaws: case size since on the caseback you can see the movement is too small and yes 42mm works well but 41 would be even better IMO, then no running second doesn't work for me neither. Too bad cause movement and design are awesome. I do love the IWC aestethic but lug to lug is big and at this price point it should be 1mm thinner and flyback IMO. So the Omega is the clear winner here but I would pick the black dial to get the sandwich dial

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +1

      Thank you! Well yes, but usually it is common nowadays with all the oversized watches, too small movements for the cases. I would love to see it sub 40mm tbh.

  • @jerry101927
    @jerry101927 Год назад +1

    Exceptional video. I agree they are all too expensive for what they offer.

  • @michaeljordan6008
    @michaeljordan6008 Год назад +3

    JLC edges the IWC because of the movement.
    The Omega, while nice, isn’t on the same level.

    • @lorghi
      @lorghi 9 месяцев назад

      Anti-magnetic up to 15K gauss silcon spring drive and co-axial, the only one METAS certified and is not on the same level?

  • @jackprick9797
    @jackprick9797 Год назад

    Great video, thank you. My favorite is the speedy. Unfortunately for the price, i believe you should get some decent water resistance. The watch is so beautiful, i would want to wear it every day.

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +1

      Thanks for watching! You’ll be fine with that for everyday use :)

  • @kimpop6701
    @kimpop6701 Год назад +1

    JLC for sure

  • @agill2103
    @agill2103 Год назад +2

    IWC all day

    • @TwentyOne_Five
      @TwentyOne_Five Год назад

      I bought the IWC 6 weeks ago. Impulse buy. Don’t like large watches. But it’s so fun!.
      He didn’t cover the IWC bracelet but it annihilates the other two bracelets.

  • @snikt2121
    @snikt2121 Год назад +2

    JLC all the way

  • @sodiri81
    @sodiri81 3 месяца назад

    Iwc but on the steel bracelet. Whole different look

  • @yashara1e
    @yashara1e Год назад +2

    IWC is the value playe

  • @vintagedigital108
    @vintagedigital108 Год назад +1

    Iwc is beautiful but it’s so damn thick.

  • @mjvjr4139
    @mjvjr4139 Год назад +1

    Polaris all the way

  • @Aoelx
    @Aoelx Год назад

    Did NK also have the green 57 😊 ?

  • @talatalshaban3184
    @talatalshaban3184 Год назад +2

    JLC Polaris chronograph does not have a screw-down crown!

  • @Vess_Iossifov
    @Vess_Iossifov 10 месяцев назад

    Bulgari octo roma chronograph is the winner 🙂

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад

    JLC 100%

  • @Anonymouslyme1
    @Anonymouslyme1 2 месяца назад

    Omega, easy win

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад +3

    5 Bar on the Omega is just a loss for me...

  • @levedia
    @levedia 7 месяцев назад

    Jlc and then iwc. Both are better than the omega.

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад +1

    All of these are much cheaper online...

  • @levedia
    @levedia 7 месяцев назад

    JLC is a much better watch.

  • @paulcu130
    @paulcu130 2 месяца назад

    omega

  • @sac_fijian6314
    @sac_fijian6314 Год назад

    One of the reasons why rolex got so popular is cos almost every model has double gasket with screw down crown and real 100m WR. Even their dress watches are fully capable of a free 10m lagoon dive. Omega needs to up their game on the speedy line up and at least put a screw down crown and caseback so the average buyer who wants a daily wear would consider it. The speedy line is definitely not a one watch collection cos of the non existence water proofing. That single gasket seal on the crown doesn't do anything as the chrono pushers have zero gasket.

    • @AleksWatches
      @AleksWatches  Год назад +5

      50m is totally fine for daily wear. Don’t see the WR as the issue.

    • @ilmostro16
      @ilmostro16 Год назад +5

      The Omega is manual wind so you absolutely do not want a screw down crown. It’s not a diver, what pool are you swimming in where 50 meters of rating won’t be enough? Let’s be honest, we aren’t taking any of these very expensive watches deeper than a hot tub.

  • @drtiagofernandez
    @drtiagofernandez 3 месяца назад

    Jlc

  • @ES-tr5no
    @ES-tr5no Год назад

    Egads! Not a tolex to compare them to! Gadzooks!
    Great to see 3 watch makers not compared to a watch seller.