@@Cemilaws No the problem is low yield. Basically amoled manufacturing gets more volatile the larger the screen size making it unviable commercially in comparison to WOLED or QD-OLED
dream scenario for me would be 45'' ultrawide oled with those options 32'' 4k is too small for me personally now after playing on odyssey neo g9 57 and lg 45'' ultrawide oled 7680x2160 oled @ 240hz or 5120x2160 @ 240hz oled I will take whichever one or hell even option for 7680x4320 @ 120hz oled
They need to get some good glossy 4k monitors I can replace my LG C1 Oled with and get it at costco canada for me to buy. I got my money back with extended warranty for my lg c1 due to burn in, I want to make sure to get the costco warranty since it covers that.
Surprisingly good news on tandem oleds. It’s the logical next step with pholed. I’ll be using oled tvs until oled monitors are ripe for the picking. Can even set up a controller pc set up for tv/pc and enjoy proper 4k until it’s in monitor form.
@@Xeonzsdepends on what games you play, even with a GPU like a 3080 you can get well above 360fps in games like rocket league even at 4k. It obviously won't work for more intensive games but that's why we have dlss and fsr
LG will release Tandem OLED monitors and TVs in 2026 they will be the real upgrade over current OLEDs because Tandem OLED has 2 times and higher Fullscreen brightness than current OLEDs not only that they have way higher lifespan than current OLEDs.
The first one sounds like a dream to me, if it also has the best Display Port, Nvidia GSync, a glossy screen and a nice stand, which doesn't take too much space on the desk
The 7680x2160 QD Oled would be the best thing ever IF AND ONLY IF it has configurable picture by picture. I want a single monitor with a 4K 16-9 gaming area in the middle and two 8 by 9 screens on the sides. Now QD Oled needs to get even better against burn in or an updated miniLED variant would probably do.
4:30 That RGB LG OLED would finally be a true end-game OLED monitor, unlike the first generation of 4K 32" OLEDs with middling 10% brightness. Let's just hope LG improves/ditches their grainy coating by then!
I would be pleasantly surprised if those 5120 x 2160 monitors go for any less $2000 out of the gate. As incredible as it is, my 6800XT would cry and die if it tried to runs most games at that resolution.
I heard they are making one late 25 early 26 that will be 38-40 inches with those specs. A 40 1000R-1200R would be perfect IMO. PPI would be awesome on that screen.
@@juanblanco7898 more resolution than 2k due to smaller size the res is closer to 4k than 2k with optimum screen Width for competitive peripheral vision. I do own 24" 2k non oled monitor and when im gamin on it it feels amazin even on shitty 165hz, that size with new tech would be NUTS
Lol I just got the 32" Alienware 4K 240 QD-OLED earlier this year. But if they offer a 5120x2160 glossy QD-OLED at 39'+ with better brightness, i'll upgrade again lol.
Same, absolutely stunning display. I'd ditch it for 8K 240HZ in a heart beat with a 5090 /Titan and Ryzen 9000x3D CPU. Display Port 2.1 minimum, but 4K 480hz / 8K 240HZ Dream OLED is the end game until 16K
@@androidx998k just doesn't make a lot of sense tbh. With 20/20 vision and a 32" 4k monitor you have to get closer than 60cm to make out individual pixels. If you're gaming like a normal human being 8k will just slow you down (unless you're playing in VR) and eat up resources better spend on other aspects in games instead of resolution.
@@malogor2127 I have 20/15 Vision currently. When viewing the monitor as a whole there are perceptibilty visual information being added going from 4K to 8K, just because the typical layman will consider 1440p to be fine, but they cared at all and had the hardware to push it 4K is significantly sharper and more detailed. 4K has 2.25x the amount of visual information to process. For those wired and capable of seeing it consistently it a meaningful and impact difference in immersion and increases the appreciation for the art that video games and other media are. 8K is FOUR TIMES the amount of Visual Information compared to 4K. Once the point is reach that ANY consumer grade hardware can push it and we are able to enjoy it on a high refresh rate 8K 32" Monitor, it'll make 4K look like 1080p, by comparatively rational numbers
@@androidx99why the fuck you would you need 8k on a monitor that would be legit pointless. 32” at 1440p already looks outstanding. Doing 4k I cant even imagine how good that looks. 8k would be unplayable
First time your channel has shown up in my recommended feed. Fantastic video. Instant thumbs and subs. I was going to pick up the Asus 32" OLED for Christmas, but now I think I'll wait to see what happens after the first of the year.
Can't justify OLED monitor dying from burn-in after a few years of use. Still using my old LCD monitor as a second screen with a new IPS now. Looking forward to MINI LED and MICRO LED displays
@VaskoGame great for you! I would imagine most of the monitors work for decade or longer, including the OLEDs. There's plenty of prevention methods nowadays. So you don't have to buy new monitor every three years even if you go for modern OLED, have no fear 😁
@lepari9986 no anger intended 😁 I've just watched hardware unboxed burn in vid. He is already seeing burn in. Just seems not worth for spending thousands of dollars right?
800R is crazy I dont want to sit so close I can feel the heat off the monitor. I'll just use my VR headset at that point. It'll probably be cheaper anyway.
Problem is that there's no way tech will catch up to this just yet, no body will be running anything at 8k 120hz not to mention the lack of 8 k content out there.
Dlss and fsr will allow games to be run upscaled to 8k and I'm pretty sure a 4090/next gen GPUs will be able to run games like rocket league natively at 8k 120
That will look insane! Unfortunately it will take a while before that resolution becomes more ubiquitous with a higher refresh rate. We will definitely be into 2035 for that
Have to say I have totally changed my tune on the monitor I bought originally coming from my brighter ROG Swift PG27UQ monitor to this Oled 4k PG32UCDM HDR originally I thought it was too dark. but since I have the monitor for 6 weeks now and set it up properly it has been great and plenty bright enough and actually it makes sense now proper 400 dark values makes sense, in fact I use either the hdr10 or dolby vision true dark and its both excellent but its the whites that show up more too ironically or not. personally i would never buy a monitor thats not a proper shape like 3840x2160 iwould do 5k but it wouldnt be widescreen
I just wanna have a 27" 1440p 240-250hz tandem WOLED w/ glossy coating and uhbr10 + full speed hdmi 2.1 ports (so no dsc). I guess I'll have to wait an eternity for a display with those specs to materialize.
I’ll tell you what, they better all come with DP 2.1 and have Dolby Vision. We know Samsung won’t have Dolby Vision and currently the only monitor currently with dp2.1 is the Aorus FO32U2P. Need this for future proofing as the 5090 will have dp2.1.
What do you want Dolby vision for? Are you using your monitor as a home theater? Neither ps5 or pc can use it properly, you'd have to get a deadbox or a streaming stick and figure out audio.
@kaiichinose9590 gotcha, yeah, it'd be nice to have dp 2.1 on all future oled monitors, although I don't mind compression at all, so I picked the msi mpg 4k over the gigabyte one that's 350 extra for that feature.
Waiting for that LG WOLED with an RGB Tandem pixel layout for the obvious benefits over the competition, aswell as previous OLED technology we've seen thus far throughout the years Simply require a full DP 2.1 port supporting UHBR 20 bandwidth for that sweet, sweet 240Hz refresh rate @ 4K with Chroma 4.4.4 10Bit color. And a glossy coating, of course. Gonna look SOOO fucking smooth n crisp, baby! I can't wait :D It'll last a good decade or so, which ought to be enough time for MicroLED to not only improve even further somehow, but also become the new consumer standard in the industry; just like OLED has been for the past 4 years now It'll truly be end-game display tech until we somehow figure out how to make cost-effective, sci-fi like ultra high-res 3D hologram displays or virtual displays through advanced implanted brain chips or something lmao in retrospect: thank fuck we EVER managed to escape the several decades long asphyxiating death grip of shitty IPS/VA LCD display technology, so that we could finally have (vastly) better products and make significant, rapid advancements in R&D for the future of display technology
5k curved 39inch? That's a yes from me! Not sure if I want it glossy or matt though. I have a 34 ultrawide in matt right now and i am pretty happy. Reflections are really annoying. I am not a Teenager sitting in a dark room all day.
Waited for this. Still using a 16:9 QHD Display with Nano IPS and with continusly rising UW Support im thinking about buying a 21:9 curved monitor. Mini or Micro LED would be great, i cant and dont want to afford a new oled every few years. But if it comes that there will be only flat Panels with mini LED, the best pick would be the 39" 5k QD Oled i think.
My dream monitor would be the same pixel pitch as current 42" OLED TVs, but slightly wider for true cinema 4k res, 4096x2160. QD-OLED, glossy, 2000+nit peaks and 200+ full screen sustained with no ABL in SDR and no dimming over time on static images. 100% DCI-P3 coverage with enough accuracy to calibrate for VFX work as well as gaming.
I really hope next year will be the year that I can finally pull the trigger on a new monitor. Been waiting for years but so many monitors don’t seem to hit my requirements
Bro, it's a shame that Gigabyte, Xiaomi or TCL don't come out with a 42-inch screen. It's difficult to get something that size and that's QLED. In the end, they keep insisting on woled, which doesn't shine at all and the colors are inferior. Let's hope that this tandem improves things and that, as a tech tuber, the brands will give you more information. Regards, my friend.
I would like to see more esports grade tandem OLED, especially need 1080p 24 inch size at native 540-600Hz refresh rate and VRR range of 1-600Hz. Focusing on sustained 24/7 full screen brightness of 600 nits at both SDR and HDR. Also for all WOLED it would be nice to have Dolby Vision for cinematic experience. The last thing is why not cover ones seen in gaming laptops? Gaming laptops need LTPO tandem OLED as well at 1080p/WUXGA and 1600p, and need up to 480Hz and focus on lifespan and sustained full screen brightness as above. All need to be HDR10+ certified as well.
That Unknown Mini Led 32" already exist, they used in the close to release AOC U32G4ZMN, and IDK why to call it Unknow mini led... all of those panel are made by TCL CSOT with their HVA tecnology.... AND BTW, the panels are not miniled out of the fabric, TCL sell its panels without a retroilumination...
2 dream monitors I want to see the 27 inch 4k WOLED from LG end of next year. (please be glossy and atleast 1000 Nits) 24 inch 1440p MiniLED with 2000+ Zones I love 24 inch monitors specifically for games like League of Legends/Starcraft where you can hyper focus on the game itself without much eye movement, everything stays in the peripheral vision. 27 inch 4k WOLED would be crispy, beautiful, and would be a joy for content consumption and creation.
Just want a glossy (not semi-gloss, but tv glossy) mini-led with full array local dimming (I will use it for gaming, watching and productivity) DP2.1, KVM and usb c with DP alt mode and power enough for my laptop. 4k either 27 inchs or 32. Dolby visison for said watching.
@@rowanyuh6326 the thing is, I’d much prefer a matte coating in a laptop, where I won’t be able to control the lighting while on the move. I’d much prefer a glossy coating on a home monitor, where I can control the lighting and positioning better.
I tried some of the newer gens panels before returning them as I wasn't impressed enough to warrant their 1200-1400 euro pricetag. Meanwhile the grab at 0:15 shows gen 1 QD-OLED now being EOL and so far that has been my most enjoyed gen, I still have the AW3423DWF, which is typically 800 euros and now on sale for 750 euro. I'm seriously considering just getting another AW3423DWF now while it's on sale, so I'll have one as backup and considering no new ones are being made it's basically now or never. Considering on heavy games (so not mobas or light games like valorant) on 4k you're already having a hard time staying above 100fps even with a 4090 I don't really see the point of anything 144hz or higher refresh rate, just kinda a marketing gimmick imho. I do admit the newer generation panels are a tiny bit crispier, and I realize I could just play on 1440p on a 4k panel, but then why am I buying a 4k panel and it's associated pricetag. Nah, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF still seems to be the sweetspot imho, it's like the 1080ti, GOAT of OLED (ultrawide) monitors imho, the MSI MAG 341CQP is same gen, but some newer firmware, ports, kvm etc for only 50 more so it's a good alternative. If I'm not getting one of those 2 though it's going to be the super ultrawide Samsung Odyssey G93SC 49" OLED, it seems the best for the price out of the super ultrawides. These newer monitors are going to need 5090s or even 6090s (super ultrawide 4k is crazy) so the GPU upgrade will be expensive and these panels are going to be even more expensive than the top-tiers we have now at 1200-1400, combined with the aggresive 800R curve on many of them? Seems a like a good generation to skip.
Asus needs to fix their current 4k 240hz qd oled. A lot of people are experiencing black screen issues while randomly watching a video or playing games. This has been happening for months and they have no answer for the issue.
39" resolution this year was a very bad decision/design. Good to see they are shifting towards higher resolutions. I just hope those new resolutions can work out with the current gpu abilities
0:17 YES! GIVE ME! GIVE ME NOW! 8K120hz is my end game (at least until we get quantum entanglement display cables to transmit 10bit 8K240hz uncompressed).
After buying the 27" INNOCN 27M2V this summer I love the pixel density, and I have several 14" 4K monitors as well and again the extra pixel density is amazing, I want 27" at 300PPI.
For starters the 5090 will actually run anything at 8K120. Right now I'm running Flight Sim 2020 supersampled to 5K on the 7900XTX, average framerate is around 90fps but it goes up and down mostly dependent on the CPU bottleneck, which means I almost always have GPU headroom and 5K is more balanced than trying to hold 4K120, and if I'm running native 5K right now that would only look even better upscaled to 8K.
@@cenciende9401 Tomb Raider 2013 runs a solid 6K120 on the 7900XTX, which you'd be right to point out isn't 8K, but 6K will look a heck of a lot better on an 8K monitor than it does on a 4K monitor. Any time I want to go back and re-play a 10 year old game most of my GPU power is wasted trying to hold to just 4K resolution.
I know u guys gonna stone me but i love my 32gs95UE and its speakers. I tried the aw3225qf but it was not for me unfortunately but i loved the integrated powerbrick wish more monitors would come with that feature.
I have an Asus pg248qp 540hz TN monitor it's too small even for competitive games because in valorant long range targets are looking too tiny compared to 27 inch 1440p
@@Decki777 my desk is Abit small. A 27inch will basically fill up the entire width of the table. A 24 inch is just nice for me given the short viewing distance
@@peterwong9061 it's much better to get bigger desk then playing on a 24inch monitor I bought the 24inch 540hz for competitive fps games but the heads are appearing too tiny and The only limitations of Current OLED monitors is full screen brightness .
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Best Monitor Settings Here (Guides & Discord): patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
what's the best 32-38 inch Ultrawide MiniLed gaming monitor out there you would recommend?
I just want a high end quality monitor that doesn't have big ugly logos on it or looks like a transformer.
msi
I just hope and pray that with all the upcoming monitors the industry afapts the DP 2.1a standard.
Im asking for the opposite. To keep atleast one HDMI port for those who dont have DP on our GPUs or play on consoles.
They can have dp and HDMI at the same time you know (like 99% of current monitors)@@Scythical
500/1000/1600 on an OLED, 4K, 32” panel, would be a dream scenario.
I hope samsung does a x2 amoled display, its far better than qdoled and woled, i love my galaxy book edge♡
@@Cemilawsamoled can't be scaled to monitor sizes though
@@hopoff9968 why, is the problem factory machine limits?
@@Cemilaws No the problem is low yield. Basically amoled manufacturing gets more volatile the larger the screen size making it unviable commercially in comparison to WOLED or QD-OLED
dream scenario for me would be 45'' ultrawide oled with those options 32'' 4k is too small for me personally now after playing on odyssey neo g9 57 and lg 45'' ultrawide oled 7680x2160 oled @ 240hz or 5120x2160 @ 240hz oled I will take whichever one or hell even option for 7680x4320 @ 120hz oled
LG is ruining their ultrawide panels by making them so aggressively curved. That 34" 5k2k panel would be sweet at 1800R.
LG needs to chill, the coatings and curves are overly done.
34 and 49 uktrawides are always looking long but not high enough picture looks stretched.
Curved make sick to see it being sold.
They need to get some good glossy 4k monitors I can replace my LG C1 Oled with and get it at costco canada for me to buy. I got my money back with extended warranty for my lg c1 due to burn in, I want to make sure to get the costco warranty since it covers that.
800R is perfect on ultrawide for me. I just need bigger resolution and glossy finish.
All I want from current OLEDs is higher brightness.
Higher risk of burn in, lmao
@@freo2997not with proper usages of heatsinks.
@@freo2997 I’m not concerned at all with that. It’s worth the risk. I also only play games on my monitor and lucky to get 10 hours a week.
They can go extremely bright, they are nerfed because of burn in 😂
+ No VRR flickering!
I want a 27" 4K OLED! If they can make one that handles 360Hz I want two! Thumbs up.
Surprisingly good news on tandem oleds. It’s the logical next step with pholed.
I’ll be using oled tvs until oled monitors are ripe for the picking.
Can even set up a controller pc set up for tv/pc and enjoy proper 4k until it’s in monitor form.
28" 4K 360Hz DP 2.1 full bandwidth would be a dream come true.
qdoled too 👌 that would be insane
Oh my god I would coom at the sight of it
You'd need a 6090 to even make use of that refresh rate lol at that resolution XD
@@Xeonzsdepends on what games you play, even with a GPU like a 3080 you can get well above 360fps in games like rocket league even at 4k. It obviously won't work for more intensive games but that's why we have dlss and fsr
@@Xeonzs Not at all
LG will release Tandem OLED monitors and TVs in 2026 they will be the real upgrade over current OLEDs because Tandem OLED has 2 times and higher Fullscreen brightness than current OLEDs not only that they have way higher lifespan than current OLEDs.
QDEL is the future, not OLED
@@NeedlessEscape doe's qdell has instant response time and higher brightness?
@@Decki777 "brighter, less prone to burn-in, and cheaper to manufacture" -Techspot
Excited for the 4K 27" models, whenever they come.
Eww 4k on 27, no.
@@freo2997 pixel density is a powerful thing
@@freo2997 pixel density is a powerful thing
@@freo2997here we go..
@@freo2997 I'm blind so i need it closer, so 27 it is.
The first one sounds like a dream to me, if it also has the best Display Port, Nvidia GSync, a glossy screen and a nice stand, which doesn't take too much space on the desk
The 7680x2160 QD Oled would be the best thing ever IF AND ONLY IF it has configurable picture by picture. I want a single monitor with a 4K 16-9 gaming area in the middle and two 8 by 9 screens on the sides.
Now QD Oled needs to get even better against burn in or an updated miniLED variant would probably do.
4:30 That RGB LG OLED would finally be a true end-game OLED monitor, unlike the first generation of 4K 32" OLEDs with middling 10% brightness. Let's just hope LG improves/ditches their grainy coating by then!
RGB is a waste of money it’s a cheap excuse to make things more expensive. Makes gaming rooms look like a brothel.
@@alexsp7086Hey! At least no more edge/text fringing!!
That TCL Dome OLED has my full attention!!!!
All I need is a premium 32”OLED >200 ppi display with >120 Hz refresh rate and a glass cover panel.
Exactly. I mean... exactly. That's gotta be the sweet spot for the market; we can't be alone in wanting those specs.
HDR400 120hz and MOAR.
You misspelled 27" but yeah fully agree
45" 5120x2160 Glossy DP 2.1 please LG please
I would be pleasantly surprised if those 5120 x 2160 monitors go for any less $2000 out of the gate. As incredible as it is, my 6800XT would cry and die if it tried to runs most games at that resolution.
Really want that 4k OLED 45" from LG 🙏
27 inches 4K OLED 240 Hz sweet spot as I have a 13.3 inch 1080p portable monitor as the secondary one. Awesome PPI in view
Will never go 27 again after having a 32 inch, seems tiny.
@@alexsp7086 32 seems huuge to me, im on 21,5.....
QD-OLED gen3 at 5120x2160 in 45" or 49" curved in 240hz (DP 2.1 full bandwidth) plz. Glossy.
I heard they are making one late 25 early 26 that will be 38-40 inches with those specs. A 40 1000R-1200R would be perfect IMO. PPI would be awesome on that screen.
45-49 feel too big. Def taking a 34
To bad qd-oleds burn in and lose brightness so fast. I think people are going to start noticing pretty soon.
Pin this request pls
all i need is a glossy 1440p 25" QD-OLED 300hz. 123ppi will be super close to the old 32" 4k OLEDs 138ppi
true just give us 25inch 1440p +360hz monitor just wanna play my tac-shooter games
Is the difference vs the current 27" versions that significant?
@@juanblanco7898 more resolution than 2k due to smaller size the res is closer to 4k than 2k with optimum screen Width for competitive peripheral vision. I do own 24" 2k non oled monitor and when im gamin on it it feels amazin even on shitty 165hz, that size with new tech would be NUTS
@@juanblanco7898yes nobody like tvs
I need 31 inch wqhd oled monitor)
Surprised they didn't push the 8K on to 32. Retina calculator shows the perfect view distance is 11" at 27" that is really close.
That's just the minimum. High resolution is never a bad thing when you're further.
Lol I just got the 32" Alienware 4K 240 QD-OLED earlier this year. But if they offer a 5120x2160 glossy QD-OLED at 39'+ with better brightness, i'll upgrade again lol.
Same, absolutely stunning display. I'd ditch it for 8K 240HZ in a heart beat with a 5090 /Titan and Ryzen 9000x3D CPU. Display Port 2.1 minimum, but 4K 480hz / 8K 240HZ Dream OLED is the end game until 16K
@@androidx99 ur gonna get 2 fps at 8k even with a 5090 lol. 8k gaming at 120hz is still atleast 3-4 generations away in terms of GPU power
@@androidx998k just doesn't make a lot of sense tbh. With 20/20 vision and a 32" 4k monitor you have to get closer than 60cm to make out individual pixels. If you're gaming like a normal human being 8k will just slow you down (unless you're playing in VR) and eat up resources better spend on other aspects in games instead of resolution.
@@malogor2127 I have 20/15 Vision currently. When viewing the monitor as a whole there are perceptibilty visual information being added going from 4K to 8K, just because the typical layman will consider 1440p to be fine, but they cared at all and had the hardware to push it 4K is significantly sharper and more detailed. 4K has 2.25x the amount of visual information to process. For those wired and capable of seeing it consistently it a meaningful and impact difference in immersion and increases the appreciation for the art that video games and other media are. 8K is FOUR TIMES the amount of Visual Information compared to 4K. Once the point is reach that ANY consumer grade hardware can push it and we are able to enjoy it on a high refresh rate 8K 32" Monitor, it'll make 4K look like 1080p, by comparatively rational numbers
@@androidx99why the fuck you would you need 8k on a monitor that would be legit pointless. 32” at 1440p already looks outstanding. Doing 4k I cant even imagine how good that looks. 8k would be unplayable
First time your channel has shown up in my recommended feed. Fantastic video. Instant thumbs and subs.
I was going to pick up the Asus 32" OLED for Christmas, but now I think I'll wait to see what happens after the first of the year.
Can't justify OLED monitor dying from burn-in after a few years of use.
Still using my old LCD monitor as a second screen with a new IPS now. Looking forward to MINI LED and MICRO LED displays
Why would it die after few years of use? Are you living in 2008? There's literally 3 year warranty even against that.
@lepari9986 and my old led has been working for 10 years plus.
I'm not going to be buying a new monitor every 3 years.
@VaskoGame great for you! I would imagine most of the monitors work for decade or longer, including the OLEDs. There's plenty of prevention methods nowadays. So you don't have to buy new monitor every three years even if you go for modern OLED, have no fear 😁
@lepari9986 no anger intended 😁
I've just watched hardware unboxed burn in vid. He is already seeing burn in. Just seems not worth for spending thousands of dollars right?
@@lepari9986 3 years is nothing on a product that costs $800-1200
800R is crazy I dont want to sit so close I can feel the heat off the monitor. I'll just use my VR headset at that point. It'll probably be cheaper anyway.
10:44 I would love to see an OLED G9, 7680x2160 240hz pairs perfectly with driving games but it needs to be OLED.
Problem is that there's no way tech will catch up to this just yet, no body will be running anything at 8k 120hz not to mention the lack of 8 k content out there.
Dlss and fsr will allow games to be run upscaled to 8k and I'm pretty sure a 4090/next gen GPUs will be able to run games like rocket league natively at 8k 120
What I want to see, is DP 2.1a on the monitors, so you don't have to use DSC.
I really want that 27" 8k monitor 😍
That will look insane! Unfortunately it will take a while before that resolution becomes more ubiquitous with a higher refresh rate. We will definitely be into 2035 for that
@@emiel255 I am already waiting 8 years bro . The dell 8k monitor is almost ancient now xD
Have to say I have totally changed my tune on the monitor I bought originally coming from my brighter ROG Swift PG27UQ monitor to this Oled 4k PG32UCDM HDR originally I thought it was too dark. but since I have the monitor for 6 weeks now and set it up properly it has been great and plenty bright enough and actually it makes sense now proper 400 dark values makes sense, in fact I use either the hdr10 or dolby vision true dark and its both excellent but its the whites that show up more too ironically or not. personally i would never buy a monitor thats not a proper shape like 3840x2160 iwould do 5k but it wouldnt be widescreen
8k makes more sense at 32. You’d basically scale to 200% and have room + sharpness. I couldn’t imagine scaling lower.
Glossy 45inch dual 4k is what I been waiting for
Will need 5090 for that
Am affraide of the price if IS 1500+
Not for me
@@Retilecagonna be like 1700-2000k
The height will be too narrow, the 57-inch dual monitors have the perfect height
@@Gorkyplays which one will be narrow 45 r 57 in videos 45 looks tall 57 looks narrow
I just wanna have a 27" 1440p 240-250hz tandem WOLED w/ glossy coating and uhbr10 + full speed hdmi 2.1 ports (so no dsc). I guess I'll have to wait an eternity for a display with those specs to materialize.
great vid from a great channel 👍👍
How expensive are we expecting tandem OLED to be? I assume at least 2x a current (QD)OLED panel, so starting at 2000$ ?
39" is sweet spot
I’ll tell you what, they better all come with DP 2.1 and have Dolby Vision. We know Samsung won’t have Dolby Vision and currently the only monitor currently with dp2.1 is the Aorus FO32U2P. Need this for future proofing as the 5090 will have dp2.1.
HDR is trash tech, disable it...
@@drunkhusband6257 Explain. Trash how?
What do you want Dolby vision for? Are you using your monitor as a home theater? Neither ps5 or pc can use it properly, you'd have to get a deadbox or a streaming stick and figure out audio.
@@TheRanscat Dolby vision not really a need but a nice have. But DP 2.1 is a must for me esp with the new cards coming with it.
@kaiichinose9590 gotcha, yeah, it'd be nice to have dp 2.1 on all future oled monitors, although I don't mind compression at all, so I picked the msi mpg 4k over the gigabyte one that's 350 extra for that feature.
Waiting for that LG WOLED with an RGB Tandem pixel layout for the obvious benefits over the competition, aswell as previous OLED technology we've seen thus far throughout the years
Simply require a full DP 2.1 port supporting UHBR 20 bandwidth for that sweet, sweet 240Hz refresh rate @ 4K with Chroma 4.4.4 10Bit color. And a glossy coating, of course. Gonna look SOOO fucking smooth n crisp, baby! I can't wait :D
It'll last a good decade or so, which ought to be enough time for MicroLED to not only improve even further somehow, but also become the new consumer standard in the industry; just like OLED has been for the past 4 years now
It'll truly be end-game display tech until we somehow figure out how to make cost-effective, sci-fi like ultra high-res 3D hologram displays or virtual displays through advanced implanted brain chips or something lmao
in retrospect: thank fuck we EVER managed to escape the several decades long asphyxiating death grip of shitty IPS/VA LCD display technology, so that we could finally have (vastly) better products and make significant, rapid advancements in R&D for the future of display technology
That 45 better be glossy.
WIth an 800R curve, I would be interested to see how they would overcome the self reflections that would occur if they were to use a glossy screen.
I'm rocking my 4k 144hrz ips panel monitor on the meantime 😊
5k curved 39inch? That's a yes from me! Not sure if I want it glossy or matt though. I have a 34 ultrawide in matt right now and i am pretty happy. Reflections are really annoying. I am not a Teenager sitting in a dark room all day.
Waiting for that tandem OLED! It’s so nice on my iPad can’t wait to have that real and usefull HDR in games.
Mini led with 5k+ dimming zones sound like the makings of OLED like screen quality with better brightness
Waited for this. Still using a 16:9 QHD Display with Nano IPS and with continusly rising UW Support im thinking about buying a 21:9 curved monitor.
Mini or Micro LED would be great, i cant and dont want to afford a new oled every few years.
But if it comes that there will be only flat Panels with mini LED, the best pick would be the 39" 5k QD Oled i think.
The LG 27 4k RGB is end game for me, ofc if it's glossy.
My dream monitor would be the same pixel pitch as current 42" OLED TVs, but slightly wider for true cinema 4k res, 4096x2160. QD-OLED, glossy, 2000+nit peaks and 200+ full screen sustained with no ABL in SDR and no dimming over time on static images. 100% DCI-P3 coverage with enough accuracy to calibrate for VFX work as well as gaming.
I already got the 321UPX, so I wonder what displays we gonna get sometime 2027 :)
Yea I’m waiting for the 45” 5k2k ultrawide
I really hope next year will be the year that I can finally pull the trigger on a new monitor. Been waiting for years but so many monitors don’t seem to hit my requirements
Lg 45” with 5120 by 2160 looks solid. Hoping this works for productivity use case
please stop it with the ridiculous curves. 800R is way too much.
Literally under 1000r is too much
I love the 800 r curve the most
with the 45" its absolutely incredible. For the small ones like 34", it doesnt really make much sense, thats true
@@smey02 okay thats true
i love the 800r curve, and have had alot of people tell me the same that have sat down infront of the monitor :)
Bro, it's a shame that Gigabyte, Xiaomi or TCL don't come out with a 42-inch screen. It's difficult to get something that size and that's QLED. In the end, they keep insisting on woled, which doesn't shine at all and the colors are inferior. Let's hope that this tandem improves things and that, as a tech tuber, the brands will give you more information. Regards, my friend.
I would like to see more esports grade tandem OLED, especially need 1080p 24 inch size at native 540-600Hz refresh rate and VRR range of 1-600Hz. Focusing on sustained 24/7 full screen brightness of 600 nits at both SDR and HDR. Also for all WOLED it would be nice to have Dolby Vision for cinematic experience. The last thing is why not cover ones seen in gaming laptops? Gaming laptops need LTPO tandem OLED as well at 1080p/WUXGA and 1600p, and need up to 480Hz and focus on lifespan and sustained full screen brightness as above. All need to be HDR10+ certified as well.
I would love a 27 inch, 4k 240hz that can turn into 1440p 480hz (Probably not possible eh?)
Pretty sure 4k and 1440p don't scale well but 1080p is doable, maybe in the future we'll get like 1080p 720hz or something lol
@@Lylcaruis 1080p 720hz ULMB2 and 4k 360hz dual mode monitor
That Unknown Mini Led 32" already exist, they used in the close to release AOC U32G4ZMN, and IDK why to call it Unknow mini led... all of those panel are made by TCL CSOT with their HVA tecnology.... AND BTW, the panels are not miniled out of the fabric, TCL sell its panels without a retroilumination...
My god tier monitor is 8k, 480hz, 32-42 inch, microled, full gorilla glass coating, even so that monitor is going to be released in 12 years xd.
1440 27 oled is already god tier. anything else is enthusiast level
@@d0giem need 8k 27 inch 1000 hz
Probably never though
I’ve been waiting for those LG 5120x2160 for so long now. Considering 39” but not sure if it will fit, currently have a 34” at 3440x1440
2 dream monitors I want to see
the 27 inch 4k WOLED from LG end of next year. (please be glossy and atleast 1000 Nits)
24 inch 1440p MiniLED with 2000+ Zones
I love 24 inch monitors specifically for games like League of Legends/Starcraft where you can hyper focus on the game itself without much eye movement, everything stays in the peripheral vision.
27 inch 4k WOLED would be crispy, beautiful, and would be a joy for content consumption and creation.
Just glad I bought a LG G4 55" as my main. Don't see anything significantly better now or next year which fits _my_ use case.
gloss is boss. i'd be interested in the 5120x2160 panel but it has to be glossy. been using gloss since 2020 and don't wanna go back to matt.
Does a 32" 4K Glossy W OLED exist yet?
U found any?
@@tushartomar9252 Nope
No dual mode 360hz/720hz ?
720hz 😂 wow
@@Retilecagive it a year or two just you wait
i have the 45" if it get 5k 240 glossy that is def endgame for me and will def get it sometime in 2025 hopefully when it goes on sale
Hope they fix the VRR flicker issues
Not gonna happen with FreeSync, it has existed since the beginning.
I just hope they make Oleds with more than 300nits at 100%. They couldn't compare to LG C2 or other WOled Tvs
Dude that is all I want. I want a higher brightness oled with black frame insertion so I can run at 240hz and still get great brightness.
handheld pcs and monitors for 2025 is gonna be WILD
Just want a glossy (not semi-gloss, but tv glossy) mini-led with full array local dimming (I will use it for gaming, watching and productivity) DP2.1, KVM and usb c with DP alt mode and power enough for my laptop. 4k either 27 inchs or 32. Dolby visison for said watching.
Should I wait off to buy the aw2725df???
These days, every laptop display has a glossy screen and most desktop OLED monitors have matte coatings🤦♂️. Who is making these decisions?
The OLED mattes are not as bad as IPS mattes imo (semi gloss)
@@rowanyuh6326 the thing is, I’d much prefer a matte coating in a laptop, where I won’t be able to control the lighting while on the move. I’d much prefer a glossy coating on a home monitor, where I can control the lighting and positioning better.
Really looking forward to 5K OLED options!
I might be in the minority here, but I'd like to see support for eARC on more monitors.
I need 38" 5K QD-MiniLed
8K 180hz would be massive.
I tried some of the newer gens panels before returning them as I wasn't impressed enough to warrant their 1200-1400 euro pricetag.
Meanwhile the grab at 0:15 shows gen 1 QD-OLED now being EOL and so far that has been my most enjoyed gen, I still have the AW3423DWF, which is typically 800 euros and now on sale for 750 euro.
I'm seriously considering just getting another AW3423DWF now while it's on sale, so I'll have one as backup and considering no new ones are being made it's basically now or never.
Considering on heavy games (so not mobas or light games like valorant) on 4k you're already having a hard time staying above 100fps even with a 4090 I don't really see the point of anything 144hz or higher refresh rate, just kinda a marketing gimmick imho.
I do admit the newer generation panels are a tiny bit crispier, and I realize I could just play on 1440p on a 4k panel, but then why am I buying a 4k panel and it's associated pricetag.
Nah, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF still seems to be the sweetspot imho, it's like the 1080ti, GOAT of OLED (ultrawide) monitors imho, the MSI MAG 341CQP is same gen, but some newer firmware, ports, kvm etc for only 50 more so it's a good alternative.
If I'm not getting one of those 2 though it's going to be the super ultrawide Samsung Odyssey G93SC 49" OLED, it seems the best for the price out of the super ultrawides.
These newer monitors are going to need 5090s or even 6090s (super ultrawide 4k is crazy) so the GPU upgrade will be expensive and these panels are going to be even more expensive than the top-tiers we have now at 1200-1400, combined with the aggresive 800R curve on many of them? Seems a like a good generation to skip.
Asus needs to fix their current 4k 240hz qd oled. A lot of people are experiencing black screen issues while randomly watching a video or playing games. This has been happening for months and they have no answer for the issue.
When 27 OLED 4K release ?
39" resolution this year was a very bad decision/design. Good to see they are shifting towards higher resolutions. I just hope those new resolutions can work out with the current gpu abilities
Cool video, thx
1440p, 480 Hz, OLED, that has 480 Hz backlight strobing mode, which doesn't reduce the brightness too much is what I need.
I have an older g9 which has been great and am looking forward to much higher resolution ultrawides
LG needs to stop that 800R crap.
Seriously!
For sims it’s really good though.
Is 800r too much of a curve?
@ no it’s good everyone has different perspectives. Some like it some don’t
I agree at least throw in some 1800r
0:17 YES! GIVE ME! GIVE ME NOW!
8K120hz is my end game (at least until we get quantum entanglement display cables to transmit 10bit 8K240hz uncompressed).
After buying the 27" INNOCN 27M2V this summer I love the pixel density, and I have several 14" 4K monitors as well and again the extra pixel density is amazing, I want 27" at 300PPI.
Show me a GPU which can run that, and not using a time machine from 2034 either!
@@cenciende9401 ruclips.net/video/oQ9YpJsIELg/видео.html It'll only take until 2033
For starters the 5090 will actually run anything at 8K120.
Right now I'm running Flight Sim 2020 supersampled to 5K on the 7900XTX, average framerate is around 90fps but it goes up and down mostly dependent on the CPU bottleneck, which means I almost always have GPU headroom and 5K is more balanced than trying to hold 4K120, and if I'm running native 5K right now that would only look even better upscaled to 8K.
@@cenciende9401 Tomb Raider 2013 runs a solid 6K120 on the 7900XTX, which you'd be right to point out isn't 8K, but 6K will look a heck of a lot better on an 8K monitor than it does on a 4K monitor.
Any time I want to go back and re-play a 10 year old game most of my GPU power is wasted trying to hold to just 4K resolution.
Still need the hardware to get the fps
It seems like if I want a 34" ultrawide OLED I should just go for one now instead of waiting.
PPI?
i wait for 34 inch 4K 480Hz Oled Glossy
More 42 inch gaming monitors please
If there are fewer matte monitors in 2025 then it’ll be a W in my opinion.
Literally all I want is 38 in ultra wide mini led.
Now we’re talking!
I know u guys gonna stone me but i love my 32gs95UE and its speakers. I tried the aw3225qf but it was not for me unfortunately but i loved the integrated powerbrick wish more monitors would come with that feature.
hear the speakers are amazing on it, how does it compare to standard pc speakers like you would get off amazon for £20
@@MSayeed in have not tested Amazon speakers but I can say they are better than my Mac speakers.
All i want is a 4k144+hz miniLED at 32" that doesnt suck, how hard can it be
I really want at a 38" 3840 x 1600 widescreen oled with a high refresh rate. I have not heard of one in the works.
mini led is the best !!!!
All I want is for the refresh wars to stop and companies make an affordable 4K 32-34 inch monitor with 180-240mhz refresh
No love for 24 inch 😢
I have an Asus pg248qp 540hz TN monitor it's too small even for competitive games because in valorant long range targets are looking too tiny compared to 27 inch 1440p
@@Decki777 my desk is Abit small. A 27inch will basically fill up the entire width of the table. A 24 inch is just nice for me given the short viewing distance
@@peterwong9061 it's much better to get bigger desk then playing on a 24inch monitor I bought the 24inch 540hz for competitive fps games but the heads are appearing too tiny and The only limitations of Current OLED monitors is full screen brightness .
@@peterwong9061 At this point I'd strongly suggest you upgrade your desk, if at all possible.
@@juanblanco7898 nope no space 😥
What is even the point of improving text clarity on an OLED. Is OLED actually capable to cater to this feature now?