Dreamliner 787 could 'break apart' mid-flight due to safety flaws, Boeing whistleblower alleges
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 июн 2024
- A Senate subcommittee has summoned Boeing CEO David Calhoun to testify about the company's jetliners in an inquiry prompted by new safety-related charges from a whistleblower.
The panel said it will hold a hearing next week featuring a Boeing quality engineer, Sam Salehpour, who is expected to detail safety concerns involving the manufacture and assembly of the 787 Dreamliner. The subcommittee said in a letter that those problems could create “potentially catastrophic safety risks.”
bit.ly/Local5RUclips_subscribe
/ weareiowa
/ weareiowa5news
/ weareiowa
💻 Stream Local 5 on WeAreIowa+: www.weareiowa.com/watch
📱 Download the We Are Iowa app: weareiowa.com/app
📩 Get Local 5’s "5 Things to Know" email newsletter in your inbox: weareiowa.com/email
![TRASH or PASS! Eminem ( Houdini ) [REACTION!!!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cB1WrZcMwMc/mqdefault.jpg)
He should declare he’s not suicidal NOW
lol just like andrew tate. haha.
Too late.. He unfortunately passed away. RIP
@@shayalynn yea I heard the news
I hope the whistleblower has 24/7 bodyguards. Brave man.
His cameras will "malfunction" and guards will "fall asleep."
He’d better be under a witness protection program and declare he’s not suicidal.
They wouldn't dare kill him
@@isay207that’s what they did to the last one a couple weeks ago
@@isay207 Well now he turned out dead. How about that?
Under FAA oversight ???? There was no oversight.
It’s called regulatory capture. Welcome to capitalism
If the statements that the whistleblower made are " inaccurate", then why have Boeing employees gone on the record saying that they would not fly on the 787 under any circumstances ?
Exactly! The Al Jazeera report shows this!
Perhaps there could be some other explanation for that. Plenty of employees of boeing would fly and do fly. This also includes pilots and flight crew. They really wanna work exactly on this plane. And so far its been one of the safest aircrafts out there
The FAA signed off? I think you mean the Boeing man paid to do the FAA's job. The dingo is babysitting at Boeing.
And the dingo ate my baby
he needs 24x7 security...
I have friends at Mossad.
The FAA needs to do the right thing and ground all 787 right now in order to protect the safety of the flying public. All eyes on the FAA now.
It's an incredibly safe plane, one of the safest ones out there. Should they only take this person's word for it in your opinion? Or perhaps there is a reason to not believe in everything that he says?
FAA is joke for now
EASA for life 🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
FAA when an airline has a slightly different design for a light: 😡
FAA when Boeing planes has multiple design flaws: 😴
FAA is like the FDA all corrupt
It’s called regulatory capture. Welcome to capitalism.
Welp, we know who's gonna feel suicidal in a few months.
The odds in vegas is that he has a 10% chance he'll make it
FAA oversight means noting, 0 credibility! The FAA itself needs investigation and complete restructuring!
Eeeeks. That guy has a huge set. Imagine he’s wearing an armored suit so he don’t end up like the other guy that was assassinated. Horrible position to be in.
You can probably insert "737-Max" everywhere "787" was used in this piece, and leave the rest of the wording the same, and this would be pretty close to what Boeing's claims were regarding the Max aircraft.
I am always amazed at how the spin on these stories gets started right away. There is no name associated with the talking head in this video at about 1:50, but he states "Boeing says these issues were taken care of years ago". What is the first thing you think of when someone uses that phrase, "years ago"? Well, this was in 2021 that the 787 deliveries were stopped for at least a year because of Quality Control issues that needed to be addressed. Not some ancient history, as they try to spin this as.
If the 787 is grounded, imagine how many airlines that use it will be impacted.
Going...Boeing ...gone...
I just flew on a 737-max8 that was put into service one year ago, the plane looked like it had been in services for 10 years.
You must be flying on an airline that doesn't. clean their planes.
@@GH-oi2jfdefending the big companies when you KNOW they dont care about safety
@@HonestMan112or perhaps you are forcing your opinion on that person's experience. Yes, perhaps ended up in a plane not so well kept. Plenty of people have had very good experiences on dreamliners. In addition you and we don't know that they don't care about safety. Again you are trying to push something there onto others
So planning a bit more to ensure I only fly on board Airbus airplanes may just have been a good idea.
The dreamliner has been in service since 2009 if Any have fallen apart it should have already been reported.
In normal times I would have said that this was all conspiracy BS. Now I really think twice before booking a flight in a 787.
It'd sensational news stories. Is this is what informs your decisions? Why don't you listen to pilots and other experts and look at data? Dreamliners are some of the safest aircraft out there with zero crashes and it's a dream for Many pilots and flight crew to fly on one
The fAA is not doing their job
how inaccurate is 787 issues in just a month.
Yeah right. Not happened so far so unlikely.
Im not flying.
I aint flying no more!
The Boeing Company should not cease producing anymore Boeing 787s. Instead, the company must look back in its assembly line for any flaws that could jeopardize the safety of this beautifully modern airplane.
After all, there is no such thing as a perfect aircraft.
I am worried this whistleblower will not make it to the senate hearing
The most damaging thing that can happen to a good corporation is a short sighted executive focused on sacrificing brand loyalty and production quality in favor of cutting expenses for personally and shareholder short term profit.
It’s been a catastrophe in the making ever since the merger with McDonnell Douglas. Boeing historically prided itself on engineering practices. McDonnell Douglas prioritised revenue. Following the merger Boeing executives were replaced with those from McDonnell Douglas. The only time in Boeing’s history have the employees ever been on strike was in the years following the merger and management takeover. They turned good engineering practice culture into financial engineering culture. Profit over people.
Better put him under guard at the Army barracks until he can testify, like they did in The Godfather
Boeing's Firecracker project
787 has had no incidents. But I guess we have to wait decades to find out.
Yes thay had incidents. The batteries problem comes to my mind as well as the recent LATAM incident. It has not had fatal accidents though.
@@cabc74it has an incredible safety record just like the other boeing 777
Dude works at boeing, says nothing. now that boeing is in the news, he comes out.
Nevermind writing quality issues, ore actually fixing the issue for his last number of years working on it. He just signed it off and let it go, no big now. NOW he cares?
Boeing is gone
I think he is secretly being paid by a rival jet manufacturer. The 787's maiden flight was in 2009. Thats 15 years of safety record.