Adv. Qcaleka will be the next Public Protector after Adv. Mkhwebane leaves office formally. This report has just secured her employment for the next seven years. The suspension of Mkhwebane was very strategic and now the dividents are starting to pay off for the President.
Hopefully, the courts do not take the same steps they took on the CR17 files. The citizens deserve to know the truth about the president of the Republic of South Africa.
People, the adhoc commitee in parliament has opened up the nominations for recruiting a new PP. Please let us have our say in this matter. We need a senior council for this position, this time. I was thinking about Adv Ngalwana SC. The man is a respected lawyer and, he enjoys a wealth of legal knowledge and experience. We need some one who is going to clean up that office. A person whom SOME of those stooges in that office will not undermine. A man that even judges and politicians will not intimidate. Adv. Ngalwana SC for me is that person whom our country needs so desperately to occupy that office.
The President sold one female Ankole cow for R2. 1 million - bought by his brother-in-law Patrice Motsepe. Motsepe spent a total of R4. 7 million on four Ankole female cows at the auction on Saturday.07 Mar 2022 ??????
Now we all understand why Zuma wanted to stay on the top and why Sello Juju Malema is pushing to get to the top .... If criminals are on ur team then your a criminal ...
96(2) Members of the Cabinet and Deputy Ministers may not- (b) act in any way that is inconsistent with their office, or expose themselves to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between their official responsibilities and private interests; The President also exposed himself to risk of conflict, he exercised his powers as president by suspending Adv Mkhwebane whereas the PP was investigating a matter in which the conduct of the president is subject for investigation. His official responsibility clearly conflicted with his private interests whichever way one looks at it.
This country and the powers be need to understand the principles of "liquidation of constitutional "meaning ,first.Then argue .The problem is the "pedestrian " attitude and approach in this government ......yo ,😜😜😜
Then just send the bill back to parliament for re-phrasing. As it stands paid work means paid work. Many ppl are scrambling re-cast the cold iron. Just send the bill back for re-phrasing. Do we need a non-human to run presidency? Any human being posted in that position will have some sort of assets. If scrutinize enough, as is in this case, arguments can be made that the said asset is interfering with executive work. Is there a clause which prohibits a president to have an asset? I have had a shareholding before in a cc and did not get paid as I was not an employee. A cc is an entity on its own whether owned singularly or pluraly
There is no need, there is already precedence on the matter. The PP protector knows it. She just deliberately derails bringing this matter to finality.
@@user-tc5ys6xn4b LIsten to all comments and read the report by the independent pannel on conflict of interests and financial benefits. You should not allow yourself to be spoonfed all the time. Learn to seek answers before asking.
@@musajohannessithole8970 I think U should learn to separate emotions, politics and legal matters. I was hoping U were going to point a case ref. From legal pt. as lot of emotional ppl hav said so, review the findings, and whichever party is not satisfied, the case can be appealed. I dont hav legal background but I can see even the so called legal guru's allow themselves to be overtaken by emotions or have pre-conceived wish of which the finding should be
@@user-tc5ys6xn4b OR taught us not to get emotional on political matters but to engage robustly. Learn to distinguish emotions to robust engagement. It's a fact that the answer you need is on the very same platform (RUclips) you are using now. There is no need for me to reinvent the wheel. You are not a Grade 3 pupil who is supposed to be spoonfed. Adult don'task questions for the sake of doing so. I gave you the sources for a mini research on the question you asked. .
She is so selective in her interpretation and ignored a lot of aspects from independent panel report. It's funny coz if this report loses on review, she won't get the position she is gunning for.
Adv. Qcaleka will be the next Public Protector after Adv. Mkhwebane leaves office formally. This report has just secured her employment for the next seven years. The suspension of Mkhwebane was very strategic and now the dividents are starting to pay off for the President.
The acting PP scored an own goal on this one😅
Perfect analysis. I never thought Phiri will speak this way.
PP(Presidents Protector),let's say CR is not guilty in sum instance but he failed to declare the money - is that not tax evasion..
Totally agree with this guy
Hopefully, the courts do not take the same steps they took on the CR17 files. The citizens deserve to know the truth about the president of the Republic of South Africa.
Da must seek personal cost order.
People, the adhoc commitee in parliament has opened up the nominations for recruiting a new PP. Please let us have our say in this matter.
We need a senior council for this position, this time. I was thinking about Adv Ngalwana SC. The man is a respected lawyer and, he enjoys a wealth of legal knowledge and experience. We need some one who is going to clean up that office. A person whom SOME of those stooges in that office will not undermine. A man that even judges and politicians will not intimidate.
Adv. Ngalwana SC for me is that person whom our country needs so desperately to occupy that office.
Xoleka has just committed career suicide
The President sold one female Ankole cow for R2. 1 million - bought by his brother-in-law Patrice Motsepe. Motsepe spent a total of R4. 7 million on four Ankole female cows at the auction on Saturday.07 Mar 2022 ??????
UDM has become young court babies
Now we all understand why Zuma wanted to stay on the top and why Sello Juju Malema is pushing to get to the top .... If criminals are on ur team then your a criminal ...
Your passionate hatred of CIC Malema turns into a stupid.
Ngcaleka is a shame
Where is Corruption Watch?
Asleep or hibernating 😂
Dololo
This lady is on SABC news now. Well congregation just hope the news jukeboxing you've learnt @ your previous employer is not done here.
People hands off Phala phala vhathu wee!
Issue tribalist
This is SA. Phalaphala shall not end with the President being innocent. We cannot be led by thugs.
96(2) Members of the Cabinet and Deputy Ministers may not-
(b) act in any way that is inconsistent with their office, or expose themselves to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between their official responsibilities and private interests;
The President also exposed himself to risk of conflict, he exercised his powers as president by suspending Adv Mkhwebane whereas the PP was investigating a matter in which the conduct of the president is subject for investigation. His official responsibility clearly conflicted with his private interests whichever way one looks at it.
It means public servants can own businesses
This guy is articulate & precise
This country and the powers be need to understand the principles of "liquidation of constitutional "meaning ,first.Then argue .The problem is the "pedestrian " attitude and approach in this government ......yo ,😜😜😜
She is incompetent 😂
The law is clear until it is broken by Ramaphosa 😂😂😂
The BUSSNES is for The Presendent # vho RAMAPHOSA #
Then just send the bill back to parliament for re-phrasing. As it stands paid work means paid work. Many ppl are scrambling re-cast the cold iron. Just send the bill back for re-phrasing. Do we need a non-human to run presidency? Any human being posted in that position will have some sort of assets. If scrutinize enough, as is in this case, arguments can be made that the said asset is interfering with executive work. Is there a clause which prohibits a president to have an asset? I have had a shareholding before in a cc and did not get paid as I was not an employee. A cc is an entity on its own whether owned singularly or pluraly
There is no need, there is already precedence on the matter. The PP protector knows it. She just deliberately derails bringing this matter to finality.
@@musajohannessithole8970 precedence being which?
@@user-tc5ys6xn4b LIsten to all comments and read the report by the independent pannel on conflict of interests and financial benefits. You should not allow yourself to be spoonfed all the time. Learn to seek answers before asking.
@@musajohannessithole8970 I think U should learn to separate emotions, politics and legal matters. I was hoping U were going to point a case ref. From legal pt. as lot of emotional ppl hav said so, review the findings, and whichever party is not satisfied, the case can be appealed. I dont hav legal background but I can see even the so called legal guru's allow themselves to be overtaken by emotions or have pre-conceived wish of which the finding should be
@@user-tc5ys6xn4b OR taught us not to get emotional on political matters but to engage robustly. Learn to distinguish emotions to robust engagement. It's a fact that the answer you need is on the very same platform (RUclips) you are using now. There is no need for me to reinvent the wheel. You are not a Grade 3 pupil who is supposed to be spoonfed. Adult don'task questions for the sake of doing so. I gave you the sources for a mini research on the question you asked. .
Qcaleka is afraid of personal costs 😂
The technicalities
My tax returns going forward:
#Iamafama
#Mymoneyisprivate
#Thismatressthatmatress
#PhalaPhala
She is so selective in her interpretation and ignored a lot of aspects from independent panel report. It's funny coz if this report loses on review, she won't get the position she is gunning for.