The issue is that we have an acting pp who is campaigning for the position. She has turned a blind eye on obvious evidence and executive code violation
We know very well that chief justice R Zondo is employed through favourtism, same as acting PP so Ramaphosa played his game well,lets see if he will prove to the citizen that he is above the law.
How can she throw her carrier under the bus like this, for an individual, history & future will hit her very harshly. She doesn't deserve that office at all, because she turned her self to be a public sellouts.
Important point made: "who to believe"... 1. A panel of retired judges including the former Chief Justice, those who have no interest in pleasing anyone... Or 2. A young legal mind, brilliant I am sure, otherwise she would not have made it to this level, who seems to have ignored the obvious... the constitutional court rulings... the admissions by the president himself in parliament... etc... SA, judge for yourself...
When a decorated political pundit is besieged by flamboyant constitutional and legal ignorance, he is left with no option but resort to intellectual dishonesty. I blame it on the anchor, why not invite a legal expert
Prof. Seeipe has never been the independent thinker that public intellectualism requires. This unbalanced "analysis" is expected from him. Im also critical of the PP's findings on phalaphala but would have loved a more qualitative analysis, these news channels need to bring us more competent analysts and we have more than enough of these in the country.
@@lindokuhlekhumalo1683 exactly my point, he must say he is wrong in this and that! The problem with chest pains is, you want to defend, but the truth is obvious, then you end up deviating!
As sick as you're, I think you're the one who has sickness problems, and I think you're also the one who should withdraw from this issue, not unless your sickness has something to do with your brain!
Gcaleka avoided personal costs. Ramaphosa's judges are very quick when it comes to personal costs October Ramaphosa is going to appoint a new PP, Gcaleka applied for that position
I never heard the likes of sipho seepe commenting like he is suddenly doing about phalaphala when zuma was exonerated from the waterkloof gupta landing.
We don't care about that, we care about the undoubted facts that he's raise, not unless you're opposing anything he has said. Well you can state it here, we will engage you on it!
The issue is not about the guy, it is about what he says! What you say would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Rmaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself?
Let's say you're correct: give me not more than 5 things he said that were incorrectly! You will be dumb till you die if you reject the truth for the sake factionalism/subjectivity!
@@picassocube3521 Good question, i hope 5 answers will come. When i am biased i am likely to think that anyone speaking outside my biasedness is subjective. I agree with Prof's contentions on this one
That would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Ramaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself? Reject with argument not by labeling.
This man sounds like he made a bet that Ramaphosa will be found guilty, he sounds as if he is mad that he lost his money Paid analyst rubbishing the report but watch how it stands in court
That would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Rmaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself?
The issue is that we have an acting pp who is campaigning for the position. She has turned a blind eye on obvious evidence and executive code violation
That was predictably gonna happen 🤣🤣this case isn’t for actings
It's true money buys the whiskey this case the judge 2😂🎉
We know very well that chief justice R Zondo is employed through favourtism, same as acting PP so Ramaphosa played his game well,lets see if he will prove to the citizen that he is above the law.
How can she throw her carrier under the bus like this, for an individual, history & future will hit her very harshly. She doesn't deserve that office at all, because she turned her self to be a public sellouts.
Stop using a compromised analyst. He always doesn't make any sense.
Chapter9 institutions should be appointed by the judiciary committe n things like this will be avoided.
Anc knows how's to choose the pp hey😂😂😂😂useless corrupt anc
Important point made: "who to believe"...
1. A panel of retired judges including the former Chief Justice, those who have no interest in pleasing anyone...
Or
2. A young legal mind, brilliant I am sure, otherwise she would not have made it to this level, who seems to have ignored the obvious... the constitutional court rulings... the admissions by the president himself in parliament... etc...
SA, judge for yourself...
Pirates of Polokwane or class of 1992 is a problem in South Africa,please please please let us know that
Eish. 😢
May,may,may..... evidence please
Ramaphosa is not different form Zuma. He appoint people who would favour and defend him during his time as president. Same as what Zuma did.
When a decorated political pundit is besieged by flamboyant constitutional and legal ignorance, he is left with no option but resort to intellectual dishonesty. I blame it on the anchor, why not invite a legal expert
Prof. Seeipe has never been the independent thinker that public intellectualism requires. This unbalanced "analysis" is expected from him. Im also critical of the PP's findings on phalaphala but would have loved a more qualitative analysis, these news channels need to bring us more competent analysts and we have more than enough of these in the country.
Why don't you convincingly refute what Seepe's saying instead of attacking him as an individual?
@@lindokuhlekhumalo1683 exactly my point, he must say he is wrong in this and that! The problem with chest pains is, you want to defend, but the truth is obvious, then you end up deviating!
Sick of hearing bout phala phala gud grieve man get on wit ur lives
As sick as you're, I think you're the one who has sickness problems, and I think you're also the one who should withdraw from this issue, not unless your sickness has something to do with your brain!
Gcaleka avoided personal costs. Ramaphosa's judges are very quick when it comes to personal costs
October Ramaphosa is going to appoint a new PP, Gcaleka applied for that position
Yip
I never heard the likes of sipho seepe commenting like he is suddenly doing about phalaphala when zuma was exonerated from the waterkloof gupta landing.
We don't care about that, we care about the undoubted facts that he's raise, not unless you're opposing anything he has said. Well you can state it here, we will engage you on it!
This guy never said anything good about ramaphosa
You want him to lie
This guy is not happy with the results at all. He wanted Ramaphosa to be find guilty.
The issue is not about the guy, it is about what he says! What you say would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Rmaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself?
Lol 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😮
Oh my God
Proof Seepe is a known biased person who is embedded in ANC fractional battles
Let's say you're correct: give me not more than 5 things he said that were incorrectly! You will be dumb till you die if you reject the truth for the sake factionalism/subjectivity!
@@picassocube3521 Good question, i hope 5 answers will come. When i am biased i am likely to think that anyone speaking outside my biasedness is subjective. I agree with Prof's contentions on this one
This Zupta is so predictable
That would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Ramaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself? Reject with argument not by labeling.
This man sounds like he made a bet that Ramaphosa will be found guilty, he sounds as if he is mad that he lost his money
Paid analyst rubbishing the report but watch how it stands in court
That would be true, if you were neutral yourself, but to someone who has been following the Phala Phala saga objectively, will know that Rmaphosa did said in Limpopo conference that he's engaged in the business of buying and selling life stock, he even went to an extent of saying, "some of you are my clients"! Then who's a fool here? If Arthur Fraser didn't come up with the saga, do you think we would know about it, which means this matter was hidden on purpose! out of all of these, do you refer to yourself as intelligent, and do you think Ramaphosa himself sees someone like yourself as intelligent, how about your kid, do they have a smart parent in yourself?
Lol Gupta analyst
Stop using a compromised analyst. He always doesn't make any sense.
Stop using a compromised analyst. He always doesn't make any sense.