Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Remington 783 vs Remington 700
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2018
- A used Remington Model 700 or a new Remington Model 783? You can make the final decision but join me first for a good look as I share some thoughts and ideas. I hope you learn something about the Remington 783 and the Remington 700, and write me a comment if you know something I don't. I'm always happy to learn something new.
/ usog
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Love this guy and his dry sense of humor. “I think they just want to get a rifle onto the shelf in the store that makes a noise when you pull the trigger and is accurate”. Priceless and perhaps the best quote ever on RUclips. This man is not a shill for Remington for sure. Keep the entertaining videos coming! Be well.
Thanks Steve!
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns
I'm all for cheap (!), noisy and accurate. the 700 is nice but I'd rather spend my money on ammunition.
I have a 783 in .223 and a 770 in 308... I had to free float both rifles.
With generic ammo, the 783 will shoot sub MOA and the 770 will shoot in one hole at 100 yds... they both shoot better than I do.
Love your completely unbiased reviews... keep it up.
Dont know if anyone cares but if you guys are stoned like me during the covid times you can watch pretty much all the new series on InstaFlixxer. Been watching with my gf during the lockdown =)
@Korbyn Kolton Yup, have been watching on Instaflixxer for months myself =)
When he said that I laughed pretty hard. Great sense of humor
I own a 783 in 30-06. I sighted it in at 💯 yards 2" high after changing out the scope to a Nikon Prostaff with a 4" sunshade. I then shot steel targets at 220, 330, 440, and 600 yards. I shot a coyote at 5 yards, and a whitetail buck at 262 yards this fall. I am pumped about this rifle and look forward to shooting a truck load of big game with it in years to come.
@Matt Ellis I just bought a used 783 in .223, I put a new 3-9 Bushnell scope on it and shot three groups you could cover with a coin at 100 yards.
I own the 783 in 243 and 270, I really like them both and are very accurate with a nice smooth bolt and nice crisp triggers.
USOG is the definition of a gun connoisseur. He knows more than he lets on and he is reasonably unbiased. Very modest and a man you could trust. Guaranteed. Love this channel.
Thank you Mark - your good words are so meaningful to me.
The 710 and the 770 they were so poorly made, they are valued like Vegas. Such appropriate and dry humor. Love your style. Great video as always. Thank you sir!
: ) the thanks are all mine.
Awesome review. I own the 783. It was my very first high power rifle and I got it specifically due to the price point. I'm going to upgrade the stock to one of those Boyd's laminate stocks to add value to it. Thanks for sharing. I was educated on the older rifles due to your video. Awesome!
Thank you - glad the video was useful. I like the laminate stock idea - that will lift the 783 even higher.
I have great appreciation for your in depth reviews that aren't just statistics but also the real life aspects of the firearms.
Thanks RO
I bought a 783 the year they came out as a backup/extra rifle in .270. It shot 3/8” out of the box and still does today, 14-15 deer later. It takes quite a beating and requires a minimum of maintenance. I’ve yet to find a hunting version of the 700 that is as accurate or as durable. And I’ve owned many 700s.
Several commenting here state that it’s a tool that it’s utilitarian. That is exactly right. If you were a true outdoorsman these are the type of things you appreciate in a fire arm not something that looks pretty hanging over the mantle. That’s a different type of firearm all together. If you want an accurate and reliable rifle to take to the field that won’t make you shed tears if you drop it this is the best choice out there.
If you are the type that starts to cry when your bluing shows a wear mark......then not for you
Very good comments David. Based on apparent sales of the 783 there are thousands who share your view. Thanks for writing.
I love my 783 in 30-06. You are exactly right David, a firearm is a tool used to put meat on the table or protecting yourself or loved ones. All I need is a durable, accurate, dependable rifle. The Remington 783 is exactly that.
My 783 in .270 hasn't missed anything I've pointed it at or failed to put the projectile exactly where I wanted it to go. I honestly can't find any fault in it especially for a $300 gun. I loved mine so much, I ended up taking it from Tacticool Black to full Mossy Oak (new OEM stock, Browning camo sling, wrapped the barrel and re-skinned the action & scope) and speaking of scopes, I slapped a well priced Leupold VX2 on it.
Honestly, I bought it as a starter gun until I could get a "real" gun like a 700 CDL, but it's kind of hard to justify not using it. I love that even as modified as it is today, it's still nowhere near as much as a new CDL. Not that money matters because a CDL is going to be an heirloom piece, but I love "not" worrying about it when I'm out with it.
It's a tool. That's all it is. It's not a wall hanger. And that's exactly how Remington marketed it; a workingman's working gun and that's what I needed. She's a freezer filler for sure. Because I keep it clean & lubed and store well, it should last me for many years (who knows...decades even) for the few weeks that I take it hunting in the Northeaster woodlands in all conditions.
My 783 was great until I slipped climbing over an icy log and fell on my back with my rifle on. It bent the barrel. Lame. I have a 1934 Remington .22 that has been used hard without bending. I think they used soft Chinese steel for the 783.
I liked your review David. Watched it over too.
Excellent video, and very good concept. You address many if not all, of the questions a buyer would have in deciding between a Model 700 vs. Model 783.
Your camera crew did a terrific job and I wish you and them a Happy Thanksgiving!
When a person asks me for my thoughts on buying a budget hunting rifle my first piece of advice to them is to look for a quality (model 700, model 70, etc.) hunting rifle on the used shelves of the gun and pawn shops in the area. The second piece of advice I give is to look for a sporterized military rifle as their actions are generally superior than the one in an econoline big box gun. The third piece of advice is to generally avoid gun and scope combos because a person gives up control over the quality of scope being put on the rifle. Beyond that I generally encourage people to go with walnut over synthetic stocks in most applications because synthetic stocks always look like synthetic stocks.
What these econoline guns excel at is to be in an abusive environment (like a truck gun) where a person would prefer not to risk a better quality firearm. Also, I think they are the latest evolution of what began when the majority of the American gun buying public ultimately rejected the semi-custom pre-64 Winchester Model 70 in favor of cheaper and cheaper and cheaper firearms. When people lament the loss of great guns such as the Winchester Model 12, Winchester Model 9422, Savage Model 99, and numerous others it is because they know what was lost and that is quality. Sadly, the guns that are in ever greater demand are, in many ways, a disposable firearm reflective of the disposable society we live in.
Thanks for the great reviews.
Perfect review. Thank you
The 700 is a classic and I'll take walnut over plastic (they can call it whatever they want) any day. Interesting to get a look at the 783 though, thanks!
Glad the video was useful - I learned from making it too.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns how about possibly your favorite rifle, the Remington 798? That'd be great too see
WestCoaster ..My 25 year old 700 has the original plastic stock, and shoots .37 inch groups at 100 yards. Plastic is not necessarily bad
Trying to figure out this is a early Model 700 grandfather passed down to
USOG thank you for this very informative video, I’ve owned a 770 (243) for about 15 years now. My 770 has never showed any problems in function, the bolt moves very smooth, the magazine locks in place securely and exit’s quickly. But my next 243 will a 700 with a 26 in barrel.
I had a 770 worst gun on planet earth for me
I grew up around Weatherby Mark V rifles. My Dad had many of them so it's very hard for me to embrace the cheap versions of any particular brand. I'll always prefer precise smooth actions, beautiful wood and blued rifles over the new discount versions. This was a very well done review of the different Remington models and I appreciate your honest evaluation. The review has left me well informed when considering a Remington model.
Definitely agree with you on the 788, all these new budget rifles look the same to me. My favorite sporting bolt action rifle I owned was an old Ruger 77, with the red butt pad that I like a dumbell, sold. Loved the look of that rifle.
That Ruger you had was truly great. The good news is they are still around on the used racks - with the tang safety; great looking rifle.
783 is a reused Marlin! I got one with out a scope for $220.00 a few years ago. Great gun. Great video.
Had a 783 about a decade ago, miss that rifle, invested around 750 bucks on it and the rifle did real good. I replaced the stock with an MTD stock with a few 5 rounds magazines, put a cheap Prostaff scope, a custom barrel tip to keep recoil down, a scope level and re-loaded some nice 308s different weights. I tell you what, I sold it for around 1500 bucks to one of my friends who liked to hunt, he came back from Montana after a weeks hunt and brought me some real good Deer meat and some pictures, of the hunt, he said that rifle was shooting straight like an arrow! I was looking at the 700s but they were a little out of my range. The 783 had some issues though, the stock was flexing when shooting the rifle and the barrel was not seated properly from the factory, also the trigger housing cracked because is not metal, is some kind of plastic, the factory mags did not seat properly causing feeding issues, after I changed everything I wanted, the rifle shot straight. I called Remington in reference to this issues, hopefully they fixed them. The best 259 bucks I ever spent on a rifle! 👍
I have four 700s. The last one I bought was a brand new .300 WinMag SPSS, factory-ugly in stainless with polymer stock and built-in recoil pad. I found I was not enjoying my hunting trips because I worried too much about scuffing my beautiful wood stocks. Well, the .300 WinMag SPSS recoil pad is actuallyREALLY effective, and it doesn't beat me up as much as the 700 BDL in .270 with an early 1980s recoil pad (the .270 was the only one I bought used, others were new.) I love my 700s, they all shoot very well. The later (2012) SPSS needed warranty work because the bolt cam timing was off so it wouldn't extract even unfired cartridges, but that got fixed. Love 'em. Only the Mauser 98 actions appeal to me more, with that controlled-feed claw extractor. Great video!
I really enjoy your informational rifle videos. You have vast knowledge on all kinds of rifles and it is most entertaining as well as educational. You mention in your comparison of the 783 to a Vega and most likely not many people picked up on that as the Chevy Vega was one of the first four cylinder cars with an aluminum block that came out in the if I am not mistaken the early 70’s. I am 65 years old now and I love Remington 700 BDL’s. My Father has a 1968 Remington 700 BDL and it is in immaculate condition has only had 40 rounds fired from its barrel. The bolt action is just smooth as butter. The ejector works flawlessly and is very strong. I really had a good time shooting this rifle. It has a mild recoil and the iron sights are a delight. At around 50 feet dead center is a bullseye. Just a wonderfully made rifle. The stock has a beautiful shine like a fine satin gloss. The trigger is also a delight to experience. Just a tad of take up and she fires. Very light trigger pull. This is one reason I love this video of your because I have a great interest in Remington 700’s.
Thanks Kevin! I'm glad my videos are okay. As for your 700 - a timeless value - especially the older models; although even the new ones are excellent. All the best to you and thanks for being on the channel.
I have two 783's with 16.5 " Heavy Threaded Barrels, in .308 & .223 they both shoot sub MOA groups out of the box, I upgraded the stock to the Boyds AT-ONE and they both are keepers.I also have 2 Remington 700 SPS rifles in .308 & .223 with 20" Threaded Bull barrels Houge Over-Molded stocks, My 783's & 700's all shoot sub-MOA Groups.I also own a Mossberg Patriot in .308 and I am getting sub moa groups straight out of the box.
Always a decent review. Going to go to your Patreon site and sign up as well. I've been toying with the idea of a 783 lately. It goes counter to my natural love of walnut and fine blued steel but I have to wonder if in my dad's and granddad's day if they were offered a cheaper rifle like this if they wouldn't have jumped on it as well. Seems like so many of the older generation (and current) view the firearm as a hunting tool and not the end all in itself.
Thank you! The 783 is better than I thought. You're right about our ancestors. On the other hand - they were lucky - the cheap, every day rifles were Winchester 94s and Remington 30s and such - absolute gems compared to our "cheap" rifles. I don't think ours will be worth $1000. in 80 years. Ours will likely be recycled long before.
My first rifle was a 788 in 243. I still have it. I also have the 710 in 270. It works well for a budget rifle. The bolt was a bit sticky when I first got it but over time it has smoothed up some. 4 of my daughters have taken bull elk here in AZ with it. I also just bought my first 700. I chose a CDL in 30-06. Really like it. It isn't quite as nice as my Winchester model 70 also in 30-06. Great video. Thanks for the information. I would consider buying a 783.
Thanks for your note robfromaz1977 - For sure the Model 70 is to the highest standard - and the 783 is very popular among the less expensive rifles. Your daughters sure are accomplished hunters! Stay safe and good shooting.
I own a Remington 22-250 in 700 bdl vtr. The triangle barrel. It’s close to a 1000 dollar rifle here in Canada. My new 22-250 783 touches bullets to at 100 with my reloads. Way to go Remington. I’m sticking with Remington forever.
Great rifle - I've seen them at the range and the accuracy is something to see; the barrel configuration is striking for sure. Thanks for the note.
For such a collector you really are honest with the reviews without being a snob.
Thank you Etienne.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns I love to learn about the different designs for their engineering not the brand stamp.
I was thinking about the heavy barrel short version since we can only shoot 200 yards in my province.
The bolt knob is upgraded but the front of the stock is as flimsy , little detail but a good action .
Thanks a lot , your experience made me buy reliable designs that we enjoy .
I have the heavy barrel 783 version in 6.5mm, the bolt is smoother than a rifle worth several times over, the bolt knob is round, detachable (upgradable), and I was able to get my trigger down to 1.75lbs. Speaking on the trigger it is VERY crisp. My example has absolutely no creep. The barrel is threaded too. The stock is not good but it is easily replaced with anything from factory wood to high end chassis, I do like the recoil pad but it is a bit slippery, I added some black camoform wrap. My example was not freefloated but it was easy to resolve with a dremel in a few high spots. The receiver is definitely more rigid (more material). The heavy version doesn’t include the scope but I wouldn’t want it anyways. It does have a full rail however. The reason you have a problem with distance is that the parallax is probably set at 50 yards. I’m happy with mine. Especially since it was practically free as I traded it for an unused rifle in our collection, cheers.
That is a really nice looking rifle! I'll try the scope again - couldn't find a way to adjust parallax - I'm sure it is just me. All the best.
USOG from what I see it is not adjustable. Most scopes without parallax adjust are set to 50 or 100 yards. Happy holidays!
I have three 700 ADLs that were purchased over the years as a combo that included a scope. I do own other rifles with much nicer scopes, but the supplied Remington scopes are fine for my needs. I may or may not upgrade the scopes. Recently, all three ADLs were upgraded with two walnut and one laminate CDL stocks, purely for cosmetic purposes. I did consider a 783 in walnut, but ended up with my third 700. No knocks against the 783, I just went with something I knew.
I like your stock ideas - a new stock reminds me of new tires; makes it seem as if I have a new car : )
Just bought a 700 bdl in 7mm mag. Used but new to me. Love it 🥰
Hi Shawn - That's the classic cal. for the 700 - perfect!
Such a well thought out review! That is something to think about, how much is your new gun worth? Does it drop in value when you drive it off the lot like a cheap car or hold value? You’ve definitely helped me understand firearms better!
I would like to request that you review the Winchester XPR. It is a budget priced gun, but perhaps it deserves to be in the next class up! They even offer it in walnut 😲
I wonder how it compares to the Remington 700 and the Tikka? Thank you for all your wonderful videos 👍🏻👍🏻
Hi Joe's - thank you and I'm just waiting for an XPR to come my way and I'll review for sure. From handling a few they seem to be a cut above.
Love this guy
I won a 783 .223 without scope on egunner and can’t wait to sight it in and start shooting it! It’s a 16” heavy barrel
BTW, I would love a Remington 745/7400 - 760/7600 and perhaps rarer 4/6 models shown off.
Keep reading about the great 35 Whelen models and the after-market changes to calibers like 9.3x62. What's not to love about a platform that has stock commonality with the 20ga Remington 870 and can be a magazine fed hunter. Lumley Arms of Australia even sells a forearm adaptor so you can use 870 parts and Mesa Tactical makes a 20ga-12ga adapter so you can use all the 12ga receiver related stocks. That means an even great selection of pump and stock combination for that classic rifle.
Amazing - those creative Aussies! Thank you for sharing - and you're right - great flexibility. I'll keep an eye out for those fine models for another review. Best to you.
Would you be willing to review the browning x bolt white gold medallion, also, you should do some videos on cartridges, like the 7mm rem mag or .270 win. Just a few suggestions! Thanks for the time you put into the videos and the replies!
I have a 788 243 with a custom stock bought it for 300 and it shoots .5 in groups with factory ammo and .4 with handloads I don’t really care for the 783 great vid.
Edit: Also I get all Leupold 50 percent off because my brother is a hunting guide.
Hi TN - the 788 is the greatest value for the lowest price that I know of. Incredible rifles!
Thank you for the content very informative you’ve earned a sub.
I own a 783 and know others that have them. They just plain get it done. $350 gem. Thanks for your great videos.
Hi Dave - Yes - excellent rifles - amazing value.
Do any of the parts off any 700 swap over to the 783? Example: trigger guard, stock, scope rails, butt pad?
Nice review. My 783 30.06 was terrible out of the box. I swapped the scope for a Vortex Viper 3x9x50 and it still was bad. The stock was touching the barrel in 3 places. I ground it out a bit and epoxy bedded the recoil lug. 1 inch groups at 100 yds now.
Hi Jason - I hope they can make a better rifle soon - although they seem to be quite accurate.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns I'm happy with the accuracy now. I need to do something with the bolt handle though. I have a regular size 3x9x50 scope on it and if I'm not careful I scrape my thumb on it when cycling the bolt. Might try higher mounts and a cheek riser.
I had to chuckle when you sai “ and maybe a better shooter “ because that’s my excuse too. Good job on the video.
Thanks again Shawn!
Well here is my opinion on the subject of budget rifles. Prices of everything keep going up while the wages tend to go up at a slower pace. Taxes have gone outrageously high, water bills for those who live in the city have gotten way out of controll, and my father told me you now have to pay to have a permit to build a shed in your own back yard and a permit to build a privacy fence! It is getting harder and harder for a lot of people to afford a decent rifle like a 700. I love a good walnut stock but man, i just cant afford it! Cars and trucks are becoming a major maintenance nightmare compared to the ones made in the 90s and the list goes on and on. All I can afford is the 783 and it does what i need it to do. I do wish i could buy a used 700 at a pawn shop but if i can achieve the same goal with a 783 at a lower price then i have no choice. My only sweet sweet gun is my jm true Marlin 45-70 govt! Which i bought before i got married and had kids. Man those were the days! Lol. Point is the value of a dollar has dropped significantly and most people aren't making enough for what they really want so you have to pick the lesser of 2 evils. And maby over the next few years ill be able to afford a good wooden stock for it.
Hello Google User - you speak for countless millions of people. I often wonder why these things are so. Everyone is so busy. Bills are so high. So much action everywhere; but it is easy to mistake action for progress. Your thinking is so clear and your writing as well - maybe start a channel or a web site - people want to know what is going on - how is this all happening. I know they do because they ask me.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns A 788 REM AND 780 22CAL WITH WALNUT SELL HIGH HERE SOUTH WEST. VA
A NICE ADL 90 TO 95 % 375 TO 450
I bought my 783 in 300 Win Mag. for $300 out the door. ( At Fred Meyers.) Scope included. Tossed the free scope & mounts. Replaced them with a Bushnell Elite, 4-16X40. Weaver rings. Nice shooter for the money. I agree. Don't think it will be a collectors item...ever! Thanks for the share!!
Hi Steven - I seem to hear this from many people. The 783 is a solid performer. Remington has a winner.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns, you were very gentle in your review. Top marks, as always!
I enjoy your videos....THANK YOU ..!!
I just got one of these at a pawnshop for under 300 (the 783) and was wanting to get a good comparison between it and the 700. this video is great for that. The scope IMO is pretty garbage right out of the box. The scope shadow is so narrow you almost have to be right up to it (so don't even try it with the 300 mag) And the bolt isnt the smoothest operation for sure.
Still a great buy - and they tend to be very accurate.
Great video.
To mew the scratches and marks on a used rifle are reminders of hunts past. My 43 year old ruger blackhawwk has scratches over 80% of it and the blue is faded and a drop or two of rust sll are marks of honor.
I agree.
I bough a 783 walnut stock in 270 with a vortex crossfire 2 as combo for 700$ cad, I’m just learning to shoot and finding things out but with reloads my best grouping was 3 rounds touching at 100 yards so far it does the job but I’m shopping for a older 700 in 270 just to compare and keep both lol
That 783 you have is about as accurate as it gets. Sounds like a keeper to me.
Never was and never will be a fan of the black plastic stocks. Nice wood and blue steel fits me perfectly well.
Same page as me
So. I bought a 783 in 300 win mag. It was on a whim at a gun show. Wanted something hard hitting that I could shoot whenever, without throwing wads of cash around. What a great workhorse of a rifle. I could not have cared less about looks but wanted something inexpensive, relatively light weight in that calibre and tough. The sight, as you rightly state, is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. I threw on a decent Bushnell and did a basic bedding job (probably a bit pointless in retrospect but all it cost me was some time and globs of resin) now fully loaded with 3 rounds at 9 pounds, I have a basic but very serviceable 'mountain' rifle that I didn't need to mortgage the house for and which can control all the larger 'pests' I want it to. I also own a Weatherby Mk V in 300 win mag so it isn't like I don't appreciate decent rifles, but there is also something to be said for a tool that gets the job done cheap and for a minimum of fuss.
Solid thinking Freddy. The 783 is very popular and gives thousands access to a shooting iron at a decent price. As you know, your Weatherby is vastly superior but not every coin is gold.
So, a point on the 783 ejection port. It's smaller and although the point on it being more rigid doesn't matter to most shooters, it's more related to the fact that the 783 has a detachable 4,5,or 6 round removable box magazine.
As for the claw extractor, I think that the millions of AR pattern rifles tell us that if it works for a semi auto, it could be considered overkill for a bolt gun. I prefer it because it's tried and true in up to .300 BLK, .308 and .458 SOCom rounds.
One final advantage that the 783 has is the interchangeable barrels and bolt faces for short action rounds or long action rounds.
It's a simple bolt gun. It shoots better than most people and doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
As for accurizing, I'm sure that with blueprinting, match ammo and quality glass, the 783 will shoot nearly identical groups to a 700.
I agree. Much can be done and I didn't think of the mag. aspect. Very useful comments. Thank you!
The 783 is an accurate rifle but it's more a tool than anything else. It has it's place I guess but it's not for me or any true rifleman I know. Pretty ugly and utilitarian to me, but so are a lot of these new plastic stocked flat black rifle's that are so popular today. I'll take the old walnut and polished blue rifle's any day. But that's just my opinion.
My opinion as well.
Yes, such rifles are very utilitarian. All computer designed and robotic machine made. So extremely consistent and so very accurate. In fact, once placed into a chassis, these make for easy precision rifle builds.
But the stocks are "minimum viable" designs and not pretty. And nobody likes the bolt handle with logo, needs to be cut and threaded for an alternative.
I for one still have great memories of the Remington 788. I purchased it as kid, sold it to my dad and he hunted over a decade successfully with it. Still in the family.
Sadly, the 700 has had many build issues in consistency over the years. If someone wants a new one, keep to the Sendero or 5R models, and likely replace the trigger with Timney.
I avoided buying a 783, but was tempted for 400$ Can for 300 Win Mag, but instead found a Black Friday deal for a 500$ Zastava in the same caliber. Just shipped, so another Mauser added to the collection.
I think gun manufacturers purposely make their entry-level rifles as unattractive as possible to encourage the customer to buy their higher-grade products. For another hundred bucks, they can get a metal trigger guard that doesn't look like thermos handle.
I like walnut and traditional bluing, but I have seen some of these ugly ducklings shoot real well and bring home the game!
@@stephenschwake524 Not true. Wish it was. But the cheap line is what sells. Look how Ruger has scaled back production of their Model 77. It's these cheap guns that are selling.
You call a spade a spade..I like that great channel..
Thank you for saying so : )
You didn’t go over the 783 having a fully adjustable trigger. It’s 2.5 to 5 pounds fully adjustable. The jam nut and Allen screw on the front of the trigger is how you adjust it.
Thanks Erik - I forgot - sorry.
The 783 is a "me too" gun but it does show great promise. The reciever reminds me of the 788. Great video Long Live Remington!
I bought a 783 for my son chambered in 243 . No regrets. My advice is buy the rifle without the scope and mount whatever scope you prefer on it. The rifle is a take driver and you can generally buy them for under $300. In my experience with the rifle it has been a good working and super accurate rifle.
Thanks Jonathan - I agree - a lot of gun and accuracy for the money. Thanks for the note!
Since I rarely drive 16 penny nails with the trigger guard, the construction doesn't bother me much. The 783 guard is big enough to get a glove in (not a mitt) so winter isn't a problem.
Will the 783 and 700 stocks interchange?
I have owned two Remington 788 rifles both were 308 but I sold them both they were solid built rifles I bought a slightly used Remington 700 adl 308 at a good price I replaced the scope that they put on it from the factory this one has the new trigger on it 2017 model.
I have 2 700s both police models one in 308 and the other in 338 Lapua, being police models they both have H-S Precision stocks and they are by far the finest rifles ever.
Hallo from Namibia.. I bought a 783 1n 2015..in 270 Win.. I used this rifle to cull game as meat supply for a charcoal team of 140 ax men.... Only 3 complaints.. 1 That black rifle gets uncomfortably hot very quickly in the sun.. I always looked for a shady spot to put it into. 2 no spare magazine.. Eventually a friend of mine brought me one from USA. 3 and it really has pathetic swivel attachments.. Other than these 3 issues no complaints whatsoever.. And it hits what you aim at.. Brilliant rifle regardless of the cheap looking Tupperware.. It works!
Hello Hennie - Thanks for the note. Experience speaks best - for sure black is not a sun friendly color; I like the lighter stock of the Ruger American - but you're right - they "all" shoot well and for the price - are amazing. Here is a funny one Hennie - I took my Henry break open single shot in .243 into the mountains - first time out with it - shot a few rounds at 100 yards : all good - small group. For funsies set up a blue shotgun shell empty at maybe 75 yards - you can't really see the shell at that distance - so you're shooting on the "idea" of where it is on a tree stump. Hit it dead center! Wish we had been filming - but so it goes. All the best to you in Namibia - fantastic hunting country! My friend hunted I think Oryx there - in the desert - he said the people are incredible and the experience even more so. All the best to you!
Thank you very much for your kind response.. Yes.. That 783 was utilzed on all our available antelope species.. It is my no 1 goto when I need venison.. Kindest regards and love your inputs..
Not a big Remington fan but I'd take a used 700 over a new 783 any day of the week.
A well-loved classic rifle, like a BDL, might cost a bit more but if you ever decide to sell your BDL, you'll get more of your investment back than trying to recoup money from a cheap plastic econo model. Heck, you might even turn a profit if you got into the BDL at a good price. Cheaply assembled, plastic feeling rifles will never become classics!
Besides, next year all the manufacturers will come out with something even cheaper...
Perfect words Paul. Evidently the plastic bolt bodies are coming. A sheet metal shell bolt body filled with plastic turning a steel bolt head and lugs by way of a massive pin. It will work and it will be light....but my goodness...an industry derailed.
I hope you are wrong but suspect you are right on. And the worst part of it is they will sell all they can make. And all the gun magazine "reviews" will praise them for their innovation.
Nice video!
Thanks Andrew
The problem is, a brand new 783 can be bought for $300 on sale at Academy while a used Remington sits on a pawn rack at $500+ For the money, the 783 offers a adjustable trigger down to 3.5 lbs and the barrel floats freely. No doubt the Remington 700 is an amazing rifle but for the money the 783 put the axis and ruger to shame
Fair enough CF - the 783 is a lot of rifle. I have an Axis in for review and the American as well - let's take a closer look.
Academy was selling the remington 700ADL for $399 awhile back.
whats your favorite center fire magazine fed bolt action rifle? Just curious.
Tikka 595
I too have a 783 and you are correct in that the plastic/polymer stock that is used is nothing at all, to write home about, is it? Mine is in .223 cal.
I have been thinking of ordering a wood stock from Boyds, of course here in Canada, ordering a stock from anywhere in the U.S will be a lengthy wait and the price they show will most assuredly be double by the time I have it in my hands. ( what with customs, shipping, dollar values etc.) But will, no doubt, be better than what I have now.
I liked the 783 and mine came with what appears to be a 'scope',..but for the life of me, I can't seem to be able to see through it clearly at all. ( It's now on my junk shelf )
The other thing I am I am looking at is to replace that bolt knob; whoever thought that this is a good design must have square finger tips .
Thanks for another ( timely, in my case ) video, it is nice to see the comparisons.
They look a lot better with the Boyd's laminated stock. I think Remington makes a walnut stocked version now that also look's a lot nicer. Maybe you would be better off calling Remington and ordering a walnut stock from them if you would like a wood stock.
Hi Reg, I went through similar thinking with various guns. After all the "improvements" I still had a basically cheap gun. I just started buying quality used - but that is just me.
Good idea Jason - I'll look.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns You are correct, of course. I will be doing this on future purchases.
Excellent comparison young man. I would like for you to consider comparing the Remington 783 and the Marlin X7. I’m interested to know what Rem did with the 783 that makes it different/better/worse than the Marlin X7.
Best Regards
Hello Javier - that is a great idea - will do. All the best.
My hypothesis is: The cylindrical receiver, the magnum contour button rifled barrel, and the pillar bedded action.
Thank you for this great video!
Please do a review of the SIG SHR. In my opinion the best modern bolt design
Hi David - I have a fresh sample on the way to me for review. I've heard so many superlatives about the SIG - can't wait to have it in hand again.
Have you heard if the 783s are still doing good?...thinkin bout gettin one...or ruger american..ive read the barrel is more heavy duty on the 783,and thats the reason the 783 is heavier than the ruger...recommendation?
I got a 770 in 30.03 at a pawn shop for 150 and it shoots good l. The one thing i hate about it is the stock. I painted it black cause it was grey. But i was wondering if you had any idea if any other remington stock would fit?
Hi Seth - good buy and they are accurate; I don't think any other Remington stock will be a "drop in" fit. The 770 action is unique.
I recently sold my 783 in 308.
It was shooting fine but a bit boring. The bolthandle was not great. And it has some feeding issues when the magazine was new. But a good starter or beater rifle. They offer it with a walnut stock now.
The walnut is better for sure!
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns Thank you for an interesting channel.
In Sweden a typical hunting licens permits 6 rifels. (More is possible but harder to get).
With one 22 and one shotgun the remaining 4 slots get pretty important. So knowledge from People like you is vital.
I have to sell 1 rifle to buy another.
So i sold the 783 for a sako 85.
But i would still recomend the 783
I bought a used rem 700 adl 243 calibur 90%ish, wood stock, aluminum trigger guard not sure of the year. with a cheap simmons optic and some random ammo for $300. Good deal? And Actual value? Thanks!
Outstanding deal! For some reason .243 is hard to find in the 700. Awesome!
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns Talked a good friend into buying a new 700 BDL in 243 Win. back in 1990...He still has that beauty!
Can you put the 783 action into the 700 stock, or the 700 action into the 783 stock?
I was curious because I have a Magpul Hunter 700 stock in 7-08. I was wondering if I could buy a 783 in .223 and put it in my Magpul stock to shoot less expensive ammo at the range.
Hi Jeff - they won't interchange. The 783 action is quite different from the 700.
As old as I am, I just can't get completely used to synthetic stocks. Even beechwood with a good finish is far more appealing. I guess it's the way of the world.
It’s just cheaper to produce and may last longer but lacks style and character. I’m in my early 30s and I’m more into the tactical space but there’s nothing cooler than ringing long range steel with a 308 and a walnut stock then cycling that action. Levers are cool too but nothing beats a classic looking bolt gun
I worked at Cabelas in the gun vault for awhile.... We got multiple returns on broken Savage Axis and Rem 783. Want a great (not just good) cheap rifle? Get a T/C Compass or Venture. The Ruger American is OK, but the mag drops with a stiff wind. T/Cs are better and more accurate.
Super advice for channel readers - thank you. I'm seeing some pretty amazing fails on the same rifles. I need to learn more about the Compass and Venture.
By the way, I m buying a 788 in 222 thanks to you. They are a bargain.
Great buy! They are usually one hole at 100 yards - hope yours is that way too. Cheers.
Where'd u find it? How is it?
2023 Update. Hi Mike. It's funny I needed at rough bush gun for some thicket areas that require a rifle I can beat up. Canadian tire had a few of these in 243 Winchester (what I wanted for whitetails) on clearance in October 2022 for $289.00. I laughed and said to the fellow. What's the catch? He said no warranty, As-is, and don't call us if you have problems. It's a bolt action what can't I fix? Anyway I bought it. The scope bases were wrong from the factory. It required an elevated weaver on the back and they had two fronts. I couldn't zero a scope I put on. LOL. Anyway, I bought a 20MOA pic rail and put on a 50 buck scope I had lying around. Bought 4 different brands and weights of ammo. 3 brands and weights were 3MOA +. Anyway it loves Federal Fusion 95gr. I had 5 shot group at .75MOA.
I took it out last fall and it worked very well. My longest shot in that cover is 50yds.
SO I think I can say - these are just fine if spend a little money and want a rough house gun for tough areas. So for $330.00 bucks it's a dandy rifle. For folks without alot of money these may work just fine. If you buy one - get several ammo types. They seem fussy.
Great post.
I ordered the 783 in Walnut stock, shipping to me next week, any opinion on Remington's 783 Walnut stock?
The walnut stock lifts the 783 dramatically - an excellent move by Remington and you're making a fine buy.
Kevin Mullins please let me know your thoughts on your rifle. I'm looking at buying one with the walnut stock.
I remember when synthetic stocks were the rage and beautiful walnut was being thrown to the side of the road. My local favourite gun shop has bins full of beautiful old walnut stocks. The pendulum is now swinging back towards wooden stocks and they are priced higher now than synthetic stocked rifle lol🇨🇦🤠
I scored a 783 Walnut in 7mm Rem Mag...Very nice rifle!
Will a 783 action and barrel fit in a model 700 stock
No.
Are you sure
What's your opinion on the Sauer 100 classic with the wood stock?
Nice rifle and owners that I know report excellent accuracy. I'll buy one if I come across a reasonable used price.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns
Thanks I appreciate it
Does the 783 use the same action length for standard and magnum calibers?
I think the long action accommodates the magnums as well.
What I can say about purchasing new 783 magazines for the 3006, I needed to shorten,, ( file down ) the feeder lips. The bolt would stop dead right on the lips! So now everything is functionable. It's nice to have an extra mag while out in the field.
IMO the 783 is OK for deer hunting, especially in the eastern woodlands where a long shot is 200 yards. My son got one for Christmas from his father in law in 30-06. However, the trigger needs to be adjusted to be lighter IMO and once it's turned down it feels OK to me. AND the scope is a disaster. The eye relief is awful and the glass isn't clear. But for $130 you can put a Vortex Crossfire II on there and then it's a whole different thing. Those of us who find our hunting rifles tend to get banged up a little appreciate a cheap rifle with a synthetic stock with reasonable accuracy. Every time I take my browning A bolt medallion out and it gets a dent in it's mirror stock finish I cringe. Realistically, the 783 getting bumped isn't going to make anyone cringe. Also, it rains here all the time during hunting season and I appreciate that if this gun was disassembled and wiped down after rain, it should be none the worse for wear. But the scope especially is just not OK in my book even for 100 yards. What's the old saying, if you don't have a lot of money buy a better scope and a cheaper rifle vs. a cheaper scope and a more expensive rifle.
Saw a used 783 for sale that had a Boyd's stock. It looked better in appearance at least.
Hi Joe S - that would do it! The Glad stocks are not signs of progress and a bright future.
I never had a problem with the triggers on the 700. I think the problem was the people trying to lighten the trigger up and not know what they were doing. My opinion there is nothing like a older Remington 700 BDL. Sorry for my English is not the best.
Your English is great! And I agree - a vintage 700 is as good as it gets and I also agree that it is best to leave triggers as they are.
Any reported issues with the 783 trigger firing negligent rounds, that has been noted/ reported with the 700?
Edit: I just heard the answer in the video.
Hi Jason - seems to be okay : )
USOG Thanks man! Definitely subbed and looking forward to more videos!
I've ordered the 783 16.5" heavy barrel in 308, I like short rifles with fat barrels so I have high hopes for it
That'll be a dream to own and shoot
Does a 783 action fit in a 700 stock?
Hi David - Sorry - I tried - they don't fit.
I'll keep my early 70s 700 , 270 . I've made some looooooooong shots with that dude !!
Hi Jim - I remember Jack O'Conner writing about long shots with that exact combination - of course - you must be a very fine shot.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns haha I used to be . Now I need my gun in a vice to hold steady !! Very fine rifle imo.
Very happy with my 783 in 308
You're right Mark
Hi there I was watching your episode about Remington 700, including 783
I totally agree with you that the scope is not good for that rifle and the stock is light. I did not know it is flimsy the fore end I mean by flimsy the way it twist
Anyway I changed the scope on the rifle and I tried it with the 308 Winchester on 100 yard and I put groups of inch to inch and a half. I love this rifle I prefer. To have it with the Woodstock Ron Palmer
In your episode, you mentioned that the parts are Interchangeable , I have a question for you Would the 783 Fit on a wood stock 700
Thank you very much and God bless you
Good afternoon Sir and viewers. There is a temptation to condemn the budget rifle and perhaps they provide an entry point to shooting sports for the person that is uncomfortable with purchasing a used rifle? I enjoy the older rifles. May I ask this question: I found 3 old .22’s. Savage Model 3B, Cooey Model 60 both with old and interesting scopes (long with a vintage appearance) and a CIL model 171 with peep sights. Also some other older vintage rifles. Interested in opinions and would love to hear from subscribers seeking a particular rifle. I really enjoy the videos and reading the comments. Regards, Charles
Hi Charles - I had to look those up! I like them all. The 3B was 30 to 47 - and looks especially fine. I've never regretted buying the .22s - they sell so cheap and shoot so well (usually) and with a cleanup - I don't think I ever lost money on one.
Good evening. I found a most interesting source of Nordic rifles in Canada. Tradeexcanada.com. Very interesting site. Any bargains there? My gosh they have 19 pages of old rifles!!
Maybe you can answer this. I've always wondered why so many gun makers use the number Seven in the designation of their bolt guns; Winchester model 70, Remington Model 7 and 700, Ruger M77, etc. Is this just a coincidence? Does it refer to something about the Mauser action? It seems like manufacturers would want to use less-similar designations for their products to set them apart from their competition.
Winchester started it Remington was next and then the ruger its marketing people get confused that's how cartridges got their names whatever sounded good or bigger. if you wanna sell give it a bigger number that number makes it more powerful to cletus.
A lot of them(budget rifles) are Savage copied. Even the Ruger American. The way they do the barrel nut and they do their version of accutriger, Savage cloned ideas.
Very true - and Savage used designs from decades ago - nothing new under the sun - as the saying goes.
Please review the 710 Remington.
Will do!
I've had my 243 win bdl custom delux Remington 700 for 14 yrs , but it's going next week for a new steyr CL 11 wooden half stock in 243 win , but I may have the 700 rebarreled in 7mm08 , my friend is a RFD so he put to one side for me until I decide what I'm doing , the 700 it's been a accurate rifle , but the steyr was to much of a bargain to pass up best regards steve
Hi Steve, The Steyr is a beauty - and at a great price - irresistible. I'd keep the Rem. though. Some people think it is bad karma to get rid of a fine rifle that has served well. I'm not sure if that is true. Just saying... and 7mm08 is a great cartridge. And maybe the Steyr will disappoint....decisions...decisions... : )
USOG lol yes I know , maybe a rebarrel on the 700 then , I’m also selling my Sako 85 Bavarian carbine in 30-06 6 shots only from new beautiful rifle , l have a custom 1903 in 30-06 well the only part of the 1903 is the action absolutely outstanding rifle I also have custom Mauser 98 again the only part of the 98 is the action it’s in 264 win mag, the bluing is outstanding not like you get today ,it was built by venom arms in midlands uk I will have to get some pictures up
What would you price a used REM 700 ADL 90% Made in the 1960?
In decent shape $650.
Yup
Could you do a video on the Steyr sbs rifles?
Hi David - as soon as I find one - will do.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns Great. I've always been curious about them. They seem different from other rifles in many ways.
WHAT?! Eleven crooked thumbs? Perhaps people who suffer from terrible, finger-bending arthritis? What’s with 'The Eleven'? Nutz!
Depends on what part of the country you live in if you're going to have a hundred yard shot or not
Fair enough Joe. I guess I've seen a lot of messy shots over the years. As it is, many young hunters believe the long shot is the great achievement - yet, as with many things in life - it is actually the other way around. The achievement is getting within a hundred yards or maybe 2 - and not having to take that long shot. I read you though - in the high country and in the open flatlands - sometimes there is no way to stalk - the long shot is the only way.
@@UnitedStatesOfGuns Completely agree. When younger, I stalked, uphill, downhill, mud, rock, snow, didn't matter but still walked away from bad shots - too far, bad weather, foliage interference. Under a hundred yards was a merit badge in woodscraft for me, under 50 a gold medal. Humane hunting is good hunting.
Compared with the Ruger 77 and pre 64 Winchester, the model 700 was a budget build in its own right as far as the action is concerned. It was not sold as a budget rifle though. There isn't much more simplification of the 700 action and perhaps the ugly bolt handle on the 783 will keep the market alive for the 700 and they wont be in too much competition with themselves. The barrel attachment of the 783 is preferable to me. I do not like the small ejection port on it however or the plastic stock. I had a cheaper 700 and replaced the plastic stock with a walnut stock and the accuracy just about doubled.
I agree with you Strutingeagle - the 700 accomplished a complete simplification of the Mauser 98. There are many variations and interpretations of the 700 concepts and methods - but they are based on the 700; just as the 700 is based on the Mauser. The 783 barrel attachment system and the whole rifle must be pretty good, just as you say - many people write me with their excellent experiences with the 783.
Excellent job man ,tell me moor
Will do Dale.
I wish Remington would come back out with the Model 788 they were some of the most accurate shooting guns made I had 2 of them a 243 and a 308 and like an dumb azz I sold them years ago
Those 788s - I agree - unlimited accuracy and value.
I have 783 in 6.5 creedmoor for a 329 dollar rifle with a scope it’s a dang good rifle. The trigger on mine is rather good and it’s accurate. Of course I like my my model 700 in 7mm mag much better
You're right - the 783 is a very fine rifle - such great value.